Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-4k54s Total loading time: 0.997 Render date: 2021-11-29T09:34:59.287Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Part IV - Transforming contract

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2016

Bertram Lomfeld
Affiliation:
Freie Universität Berlin
Alessandro Somma
Affiliation:
University of Ferrar
Peer Zumbansen
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Reshaping Markets
Economic Governance, the Global Financial Crisis and Liberal Utopia
, pp. 255 - 316
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaken, A van 2006. ‘To Do Away with International Law? Some Limits to the ‘Limits of International Law’, European Journal of International Law 17: 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amnesty International (AI) 2010. Time to Invest in Human Rights: A Human Rights Due Diligence Framework for the International Finance Corporation. IOR 80/004/2010. Available under amnesty.org.
Amstutz, M 2013. ‘Contract Collisions: An Evolutionary Perspective on Contractual Networks’, Law & Contemporary Problems 76: 169.Google Scholar
Andersen, NA 2008. Partnerships: Machines of Possibility. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Ayres, R 1998. Turning Point: The End of the Growth Paradigm. London: Routledge (Earthscan).Google Scholar
Benhabib, S 1994. ‘Deliberative Rationality and Models of Democratic Legitimacy’, Constellations 1: 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohman, J & Rehg, W (eds.) 1997. Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bolton, P & Dewatripont, M 2005. Contract Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bruno, K & Karliner, J 2000. Tangled Up In Blue: Partnerships at the United Nations. Available under corpwatch.org.
Calliess, GP & Renner, M 2009. ‘Between Law and Social Norms: The Evolution of Global Governance’, Ratio Juris 22: 260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calliess, GP & Zumbansen, P 2010. Rough Consensus and Running Code: A Theory of Transnational Private Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Chayes, A & Chayes Handler, A 1995. The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Coase, R 1960. ‘The Problem of Social Cost’. Journal of Law & Economics 3: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooter, R & Ulen, T 2007. Law & Economics. 5th edition. Bosten: Pearson.Google Scholar
Costanza, R (ed.) 1991. Ecological Economics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Costanza, R/ Cumberland, J/ Daly, H/ Goodland, R & Norgaard, R 1997. An Introduction to Ecological Economics. Ebook 2007. Available under eoearth.org.
Daly, H 1996. Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Dawes, RM 1973. ‘The Commons Dilemma Game: An N-Person Mixed-Motive Game with a Dominating Strategy for Defection’, ORI Research Bulletin 13: 1.Google Scholar
Demsetz, H 1967. ‘Towards a Theory of Property Rights’, American Economic Review 62: 347.Google Scholar
Derrida, J 1990. ‘Force of Law: The Mystical Foundation of Authority’, Cardozo Law Review 11: 919.Google Scholar
Douthwaite, R 1992. The Growth Illusion. Totnes: Green Books.Google Scholar
Dunoff, J/ Wiener, A/ Kumm, M/ Lang, AF & Tully, J 2015. ‘Hard times: Progress Narratives, Historical Contingency and the Fate of Global Constitutionalism’, Global Constitutionalism 4: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkington, J 1997. Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Oxford: Capstone.Google Scholar
Elkington, J 2012. The Zeronauts: Breaking the Sustainability Barrier. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Equator Principles Financial Institutions (EPFI) 2013. The Equator Principles. Available under equator-principles.com.
Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative (EITI) 2013. The EITI Standard. Available under eiti.org.
Fairtrade 2011. Trade Standard. Version 01.05.2011_v1.3. Available under fairtrade.net.
Fischer-Lescano, A & Teubner, G 2004. ‘Regime Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law’, Michigan Journal of International Law 25: 999.Google Scholar
Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) 1996. Principles and Criteria for Forest Stewardship. Version 4-0 last amended 2002. Available under fsc.org.
Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) 2014. Principles and Criteria for Forest Stewardship. Version 5-1 Available under fsc.org.
Forst, R 2014. Justification and Critique. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Foucault, M 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Foucault, M 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M 2003. Society Must Be Defended. Lectures at the Collège de France 1975–1976. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
Franck, TM 1995. Fairness in International Law and Institutions. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Global Policy Forum Europe (ed.) 2007. Whose Partnership for Whose Development? Corporate Accountability in the UN System Beyond the Global Compact. Speaking notes of a hearing at the United Nations, Geneva, 4 July 2007. Available under cora-netz.de/cora/wp-content/uploads/global_compact_alternative_hearing_2007-speaking_notes.pdf
Goldsmith, J & Posner, E 2005. The Limits of International Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenpeace 2015. Greenwashing. Available under stopgreenwash.org.
Habermas, J 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Hardin, G 1968. ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’, Science 162: 1243.Google ScholarPubMed
Harten, G van 2007. Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F von 1945. The Use of Knowledge in Society’, American Economic Review 35: 519.Google Scholar
Heinberg, R 2011. The End of Growth: Adapting to Our New Economic Reality. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
Hiss, S 2006a. Warum übernehmen Unternehmen gesellschaftliche Verantwortung: Ein soziologischer Erklärungsversuch. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
Hiss, S 2006b. ‘Does Corporate Social Responsibility Need Social Capital?’, Journal of Corporate Citizenship 23: 81.Google Scholar
Hurwicz, L & Reiter, S 2006. Designing Economic Mechanisms. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Bar Association (IBA) 2011. Model Mine Development Agreement 2.0. Available under mmdaproject.org.
International Finance Corporation (IFC) 2012. Sustainability Framework. Available under ifc.org.
Jackson, T 2009. Prosperity without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet. London: Routledge Earthscan.Google Scholar
James, P 2015. Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge Earthscan.Google Scholar
Kaul, I/ Grunberg, I & Stern, A (eds.) 1999. Global Public Goods. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, N & Olmstead, S 2007. Markets and the Environment. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
Knight, G & Smith, J 2008. ‘The Global Compact and Its Critics: Activism, Power Relations, and Corporate Social Responsibility’, in Leatherman, J (ed.), Discipline and Punishment in Global Politics: Illusions of Control. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kolstad, C 2010. Environmental Economics. 2nd edition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krisch, N 2010. Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, A 2002. A New Approach To Sovereign Debt Restructuring. Washington: International Monetary Fund.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulick, A 2012. Global Public Interest in International Investment Law. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumm, M 2013. ‘The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: An Integrated Conception of Public Law’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20: 605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latouche, Serge 2009. Farewell to Growth. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C 1979. Myth and Meaning. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Lindahl, E 1919. Die Gerechtigkeit der Besteuerung. Lund: Gleerupska. (English translation: ‘Just taxation’, in Musgrave, RA & Peacock, AT (eds.) 1958. Classics in the Theory of Public Finance. New York: Macmillan.)Google Scholar
Lomfeld, B 2013. ‘Contract as Deliberation’, Law & Contemporary Problems 76: 1.Google Scholar
Lomfeld, B & Wielsch, D (eds.) 2013. The Public Dimension of Contract. Durham, NC: Duke University.Google Scholar
Luce, R & Raiffa, H 1957. Games and Decisions. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N 1995. Social Systems. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N 2004. Law as a Social System. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N 2012 & 2013. Theory of Society. Volumes I & II. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Maskin, E 2008. ‘Mechanism Design: How to Implement Social Goals’, American Economic Review 98: 567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, W & Braungart, M 2002. ‘Design for the Triple Top Line: New Tools for Sustainable Commerce’, Corporate Environmental Strategy 9: 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadows, D 2009. Thinking in Systems. London: Routledge Earthscan.Google Scholar
Meadows, D/ Meadows, D/ Randers, J & Behrens, W 1972. Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. Washington: Potomac Associates.Google Scholar
Meadows, D/ Randers, J & Meadows, D 2004. Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update. London: Routledge Earthscan.Google Scholar
Merton, RK 1948. ‘The Self-fulfilling Prophecy’, Antioch Review 8: 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myerson, R 2008. ‘Perspectives on Mechanism Design in Economic Theory’, American Economic Review 98: 586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neves, M 2014. Transconstitutionalism. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Olson, M 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ophuls, W 1973. ‘Leviathan or Oblivion’, in Daly, HE (ed.), Toward a Steady State Economy. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E 1990. Governing the Commons. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E 2009. ‘A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems’, Science 325: 419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peters, A 2015. ‘Global Constitutionalism’, in Gibbons, MT (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Political Thought. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Petersmann, EU 1991. Constitutional Functions and Constitutional Problems of International Economic Law. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Pigou, A 1920. The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Powell, WW & DiMaggio, PJ 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Randers, J 2012. 2052: A Global Forecast for the Next Forty Years. A Report to the Club of Rome. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
Rawls, J 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Schill, S 2009. The Multilateralization of International Investment Law. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott Cato, M 2009. Green Economics. London: Routledge Earthscan.Google Scholar
Sen, A 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Slaugther, A 2004. A New World Order. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Slob, B & Gregoratti, C (eds.) 2015. Rethinking the UN Global Compact: Alternative Voices. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Smith, RJ 1981. ‘Resolving the Tragedy of the Commons by Creating Private Property Rights in Wildlife’, CATO Journal 1: 439.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J 2006. Making Globalization Work. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J 2011. ‘Preface’, in Coats, D (ed.), Exiting From the Crisis: Towards a Model of More Equitable and Sustainable Growth. European Trade Union Institute (ETUI).Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J & UN Commission of Experts 2010. Reforming the International Monetary and Financial Systems in the Wake of the Global Crisis (Stiglitz Report’). New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Sustainable Development Commission (SDC) 2009. Prosperity Without Growth: The Transition to a Sustainable Economy. Report to the UK Government. Available under www.sd-commission.org.uk.
Teubner, G 2000. ‘Contracting Worlds: The Many Autonomies of Private Law’, Social and Legal Studies 9: 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, G 2012. Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, G (ed.) 1997. Global Law Without the State. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Thaler, RH & Sunstein, CR 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tietenberg, T & Lewis, L 2011. Environmental & Natural Resource Economics. 9th edition. Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
United Nations (UN), World Commission on Environment and Development 1987. Our Common Future (Brundtland Report’). Oxford University Press.
United Nations (UN), General Assembly 2000a. United Nations Millennium Declaration. Resolution A/RES/55/2 (18 September 2000).
United Nations (UN), Global Compact 2000b. Global Compact Principles. Available under unglobalcompact.org.
United Nations (UN), General Assembly 2005. World Summit Outcome. A/RES/60/1 (24 October 2005).
United Nations (UN), General Assembly, Human Rights Council 2011. Principles for Responsible Contracts. A/HRC/17/31/Add.3 (25 May 2011).
United Nations (UN), Forum of Sustainability Standards (UNFSS) 2013. Voluntary Sustainability Standards: Today’s Landscape of Issues & Initiatives to Achieve Public Policy Objectives. Draft Flagship Report (not yet registered as UN official document). Available under unfss.org.
United Nations (UN), General Assembly 2014a. Report of the Open Working Group of the General Assembly on Sustainable Development Goals. A/68/970 (12 August 2014).
United Nations (UN), General Assembly 2014b. The Road to Dignity by 2030. A/69/700 (04 December 2014).
United Nations (UN), Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) 2014c. Prototype Global Sustainability Development Report. Available under sustainabledevelopment.un.org/globalsdreport.
Valentin, A & Spangenberg, JH 2000. ‘A Guide to Community Sustainability Indicators’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20: 381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiesmeth, H 2012. Environmental Economics: Theory and Policy in Equilibrium. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (WB) 2014. Environmental and Social Framework. Draft for Consultation 30 July 2014. Available under worldbank.org.
Adomeit, Klaus 2006. ‘Political Correctness – Jetzt Rechtspflicht!’, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 59: 2169–70.Google Scholar
Barbera, Marzia 2002. ‘Not the Same? The Judicial Role in the New Community Antidiscrimination Law Context’, Industrial Law Journal 31: 8291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, Catherine 1996. ‘The Economic Objective of Article 119’, in Hervey, Tamara and O’Keeffe, David (eds.), Sex Equality Law in the European Union, Chichester, Wiley, pp. 321–34.Google Scholar
Barnard, Catherine 2011. ‘EU “Social Policy”: From Employment Law to Labour Market Reform’, in Craig, Paul and De Bùrca, Grainne (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law, Oxford University Press, pp. 641–86.Google Scholar
Bell, Mark 2000. ‘Equality and Diversity: Anti-Discrimination Law after Amsterdam’, in Shaw, Jo (ed.), Social Law and Policy in an Evolving European Union, Oxford, Hart Publishing, pp. 157170.Google Scholar
Bell, Mark 2002. Antidiscrimination Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Mark 2011. ‘The Principle of Equal Treatment: Widening and Deepening’, in Craig, Paul and De Bùrca, Grainne (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 611–39.Google Scholar
Bell, Mark and Waddington, Lisa 2003. ‘Reflecting on Inequalities in European Equality Law’, European Law Review 28: 349–69.Google Scholar
Böhm, Franz 1966. ‘Privatrechtsgesellschaft und Marktwirtschaft’, ORDO 17: 75151.Google Scholar
Coester, Michael 2011. ‘Diskriminierungsschutz im Privatrechtssystem’, in Heldrich, Andreas; Prölss, Jürgen; Koller, Ingo; Langenbucher, Katja; Grigoleit, Christoph; Hager, Johannes; Hey, Felix Christopher; Neuner, Jörg; Petersen, Jens and Singer, Reinhard, Festschrift für Claus-Wilhelm Canaris zum 70. Geburtstag, Munich, C.H. Beck, pp. 115–29.Google Scholar
Costa, Pietro 2009. ‘Cittadinanza sociale e diritto del lavoro nell’Italia repubblicana’, in Balandi, Gian Guido and Giovanni, Cazzetta (eds.), Diritti e lavoro nell’Italia repubblicana, Milan, Giuffrè, pp. 2183.Google Scholar
De Bùrca, Grainne 2006. ‘EU Race Discrimination Law: A Hybrid Model?’ in De Burca, Grainne and Scott, Joanne (eds.), Law and New Governance in the EU and the US, Oxford, Hart publishing, pp. 97120.Google Scholar
Duncan, Simon 1996. ‘Obstacles to a Successful Equal Opportunities Policy in the EU’, European Journal of Women’s Studies 3: 399422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Evelyn 1991. European Community Sex Equality Law, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Everson, Michelle 1995. ‘The Legacy of the Market Citizen’, in Shaw, Jo and More, Gillian (eds.), New Legal Dynamics of European Union, Oxford, Clarendon Press, pp. 7390.Google Scholar
Favilli, Chiara 2008. La non discriminazione nell’Unione Europea. Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Fenwick, Tamara and Hervey, Helen 1995. ‘Sex Equality in the Single Market’, Common Market Law Review 32: 443–70.Google Scholar
Fredman, Sandra 1992. ‘European Community Discrimination Law: A critique’, Industrial Law Journal 21: 119–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredman, Sandra 2011. Discrimination Law, 2nd edition, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haberl, Sonja 2011. Zivilrechtliche Diskriminierungsverbote in nationalen Privatrechtsgesellschaften. Eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung der deutschen und italienischen Schutzbestimmungen, Munich, Sellier European Law Publishers.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen 1998. ‘Die postnationale Konstellation und die Zukunft der Demokratie’, in Habermas, Jürgen, Die postnationale Konstellation: Politische Essays, Berlin, Suhrkamp, pp. 91169.Google Scholar
Höfler, Rosemarie 2002. ‘Europa auf dem Weg zu einer sozialen Union? Die EuGH-Rechtsprechung zu unionsrechtlichen Ansprüchen auf Sozialhilfe’, Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht 21: 12061208.Google Scholar
Isensee, Josef (ed.) 2007. Vertragsfreiheit und Diskriminierung. Berlin, Duncker und Humblot.Google Scholar
Jaqueson, Catherine 2002. ‘Union Citizenship and the Court of Justice: Something New under the Sun? Towards Social Citizenship’, European Law Review 3: 260–81.Google Scholar
Joerges, Christian and Rödl, Florian 2009. ‘Informal Politics, Formalised Law and the “Social Deficit” of European Integration: Reflections after the Judgements of the ECJ in Viking and Laval’, European Law Journal 15: 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraske, Marion 2012. ‘Diversity Management. Vielfalt in der Belegschaft zählt sich aus’. Zeit online, May 3, available at. http://www.zeit.de/karriere/beruf/2012-04/diversity-unternehmen.
La Rocca, Delia 2008. Eguaglianza e libertà contrattuale nel diritto europeo. Turin, Giappichelli.Google Scholar
Menéndez, Agustìn José, 2009. ‘European Citizenship after Sala and Baumbast, Has European Law become more human but less social?’, Arena Working Paper 11: 141, available at www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/publications/arena-publications/workingpapers/working-papers2009/WP11_09_Online.pdf.Google Scholar
Menéndez, Agustìn José 2014. ‘Which Citizenship? Whose Europe? – The Many Paradoxes of European Citizenship’, German Law Journal 14: 907934, available at www.germanlawjournal.com/index.php?pageID=11&artID=1648.Google Scholar
Micklitz, Hans-Wolfgang 2011. ‘Social Justice and Access Justice in Private Law’, European University Institute Working Papers, pp.132, available at http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/15706/LAW_2011_02.pdf.
Mor Barack, Michalle E. 2014. Managing Diversity: Toward a Globally Inclusive Workplace. 3rd ed., Thousand Oaks, SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
More, Gillian 1999. ‘The Principle of Equal Treatment: From Market Unifier to Fundamental Right?’, in Craig, Paul and De Bùrca, Grainne (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 517–53.Google Scholar
Morris, Anne E. and Nott, Susan M. 1991. Working Women and the Law: Equality and Discrimination in Theory and Practice, London, Routledge/Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
Ostner, Ilona and Lewis, Jane 1995. ‘Gender and the Evolution of European Social Policies’, in Leibfried, Stephan and Pierson, Paul (eds.), European Social Policy: Between Fragmentation and Integration, Washington, Brookings, pp. 159–93.Google Scholar
Peebles, Gustav 1997. ‘A Very Eden of Innate Rights of Men’? A Marxist Look at the European Union Treaties and Case Law, Law and Social Inquiry 22: 581618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picker, Eduard 2003. ‘Antidiskriminierung als Zivilrechtsprogramm?’, Juristenzeitung 58: 540–44.Google Scholar
Poiares Maduro, Miguel 2000. ‘Europe’s Social Self: “The Sickness Unto Death”’, in Shaw, Jo (ed.), Social Law and Policy in an Evolving European Union, Oxford, Hart Publishing, pp. 325–49.Google Scholar
Rogowski, Ralf 2007. ‘Governance of EU Social and Employment Policies as Reflexive Coordination’, Workshop on Multi-level Governance, Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, available at www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/events/conferences/gmorgan/papers/rogowski.pdf.
Säcker, Jürgen 2002. ‘Vernunft statt Freiheit! Die Tugendrepublik der neuen Jakobiner’. Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik 35: 286–89.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. 2008. ‘Individualrechte gegen nationale Solidarität’, in Martin, Höpner and Armin, Schäfer (eds.), Die politische Ökonomie der europäischen Integration, Frankfurt and New York, Campus Verlag, pp. 8999.Google Scholar
Schiek, Dagmar (ed.) 2007. Allgemeines Gleichbehandlungsgesetz. Ein Kommentar aus europäischer Perspektive, Munich, Sellier.Google Scholar
Somek, Alexander 2003. ‘Neoliberale Gerechtigkeit. Die Problematik des Antidiskriminierungsrechts’, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 52: 4559.Google Scholar
Somek, Alexander 2011. Engineering Equality: An Essay on European Anti-Discrimination Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somek, Aexander 2013. ‘Europe: From Emancipation to Empowerment’, LSE “Europe in Question” Discussion Paper series 60: 173, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2172478.
Somma, Alessandro 2008. ‘La cittadinanza nella società del diritto privato’, Politica del diritto 3: 507–30.Google Scholar
Somma, Alessandro 2009a. ‘Principio di non discriminazione e cittadinanza nel diritto privato europeo’, in Alpa, Guido; Giovanni, Iudica; Paolo, Zatti; Ubaldo, Perfetti, Il Draft Common Frame of Reference del diritto privato europeo, Padua, Cedam, pp. 259–80.Google Scholar
Somma, Alessandro 2009b. ‘Razzismo economico e società dei consumi’, Materiali per una storia della cultura giuridica 39: 447–80.Google Scholar
Somma, Alessandro 2013. ‘Biopolitics of Private Law: Ordoliberalism, Social Market Economy and the Public Dimension of Contract in a Social Market Economy’, Law & Contemporary Problems 76, 105–16.Google Scholar
Spelsberg, Karoline 2013. Diversität als Leitmotiv, Münster, Waxmann Verlag.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang 1999. ‘Competitive Solidarity – Rethinking the “European social model”, MPIfG Working Paper n. 99/8, available at www.mpifg.de/pu/workpap/wp99-8/wp99-8.html.
Van der Mei, Pieter 2003. Free Movement of Persons within the European Community, Oxford, Hart publishing.Google Scholar
Waddington, Lisa 2003/04. ‘The expanding role of the equality principle in European Union law’, European University Institute, RSC Policy Paper 4: 124.
Ackerman, B. 1971. ‘Regulating Slum Housing Markets on Behalf of the Poor’, Yale Law Journal 80: 1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackermann, T. 2013. ‘Introductory Note’, Common Market Law Review 50: 1.Google Scholar
Arnow-Richman, R. 2007. ‘Cubewrap Contracts: The Rise of Delayed Term, Standard Form Employment Agreements’, Arizona Law Review 49: 637.Google Scholar
Ayres, I., Vars, F.E. and Zakariya, N. 2005. ‘To Insure Prejudice: Racial Disparities in Taxicab Tipping’, Yale Law Journal 114: 1613.Google Scholar
Bar-Gill, O. 2012. ‘Competition and Consumer Protection: A Behavioral Economics Account’, in Swedish Competition Authority, The Pros and Cons of Consumer Protection 12.
Bar-Gill, O. and Ben-Shahar, O. 2013. ‘Regulatory Techniques in Consumer Protection: A Critique of European Consumer Contract Law’, Common Market Law Review 50: 109.Google Scholar
Bar-Gill, O. and Ferrari, F. 2010. ‘Informing Consumers about Themselves’, Erasmus Law Review 3: 93.Google Scholar
Bar-Gill, O. and Stone, R. 2012. ‘Pricing Misperceptions: Explaining Pricing Structure in the Cell Phone Service Market’, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 9: 430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar-Gill, O. and Warren, E. 2008. ‘Making Credit Safer’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review 157: 1.Google Scholar
Bartl, M. 2015The Way We Do Europe: Subsidiarity and the Substantive Democratic Deficit’, European Law Journal 21 (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Shahar, O. 2010. ‘One Way Contracts: Consumer Protection without Law’, European Review of Contract Law 6: 221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Shahar, O. 2013. ‘Introduction: A Law and Economics Approach to European Contract Law’, Common Market Law Review 50: 3.Google Scholar
Ben-Shahar, O. and Logue, K. D. 2012. ‘Outsourcing Regulation: How Insurance Reduces Moral Hazard’, Michigan Law Review 111: 197.Google Scholar
Ben-Shahar, O. and Schneider, C. 2011. ‘The Failure of Mandated Disclosure’, University of Pennsylvannia Law Review 159: 647.Google Scholar
Bernstein, L. 2013. ‘An (Un)Common Frame of Reference: An American Perspective on the Jurisprudence of the CESL’, Common Market Law Review 50: 169.Google Scholar
Bignami, F. 2011. ‘Cooperative Legalism and the Non-Americanization of European Regulatory Styles: The Case of Data Privacy’, American Journal of Comparative Law 59: 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, F. 2006. ‘Corporation with a Conscience?New Labor Forum 15(2): 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, A. 2012. ‘The Brussels Effect’, Northwestern University Law Review 107: 1.Google Scholar
Calabresi, G. 1970. The Cost of Accidents. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Calabresi, G. 2012. ‘In Tribute: Frank I. Michelman’, Harvard Law Review 125: 879.Google Scholar
Cane, P. and Kritzer, H. 2010. ‘Introduction’, in Cane, P. and Kritzer, H. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Oxford University Press, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, R. 1960. ‘The Problem of Social Cost’, Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, H. 2008. The European Civil Code: The Way Forward. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craswell, R. 1991. ‘Passing on the Cost of Legal Rules: Efficiency and Distribution in Buyer-Seller Relationships’, Stanford Law Review 43: 361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crespy, A. 2010. ‘When “Bolkestein” Is Trapped by the French Anti-liberal Discourse: A Discursive-Institutionalist Account of Preference Formation in the Realm of European Union Multi-Level Politics’, Journal of European Public Policy 17: 1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelbrekt, A. B. 2010. ‘The Impact of EU Enlargement on Private Law Governance in Central and Eastern Europe: The Case of Consumer Protection’, in Cafaggi, F. and Muir-Watt, H. (eds.), Making European Private Law. Northampton, Mass.: Edward Elgar Publishing, 98.Google Scholar
Epstein, R. 2006. ‘Behavioral Economics: Human Errors and Market Corrections’, University of Chicago Law Review 73: 111.Google Scholar
Epstein, R. 2013. ‘Harmonization, Heterogeneity and Regulation: CESL, The Lost Opportunity for Constructive Harmonization’, Common Market Law Review 50: 207.Google Scholar
European Commission, May 2012, ‘Health & Consumers: Consumer Conditions Scoreboard’, 7th Edition. Available at ec.europa.eu/consumers/consumer_research/editions/cms7_en.htm.
European Commission 2014a. ‘Behavioural Research’. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/consumer_evidence/behavioural_research/index_en.htm.
European Commission 2014b. ‘Market Studies’. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/consumer_evidence/market_studies/index_en.htm.
European Consumer Centres Network (ECC-Net) (2011), ‘Online Cross-Border Mystery Shopping – State of the e-Union’. Available at ec.europa.eu/consumers/ecc/docs/mystery_shopping_report_en.pdf.
Everson, M. 2005. ‘Legal Constructions of the Consumer’, in Haupt, G. and Trentmann, F. (eds.), Knowing Consumers: Actors, Images, Identities in Modern History. London: Berg Publishing, 99.Google Scholar
Everson, M. and Joerges, C. 2012. ‘Reconfiguring the Politics-Law Relationship in the Integration through Conflicts-Law Constitutionalism’, European Law Journal, 18: 644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falla, E. 2012. ‘Report to the European Consumer Organisation (BEUC): Powers of the Judge in Collective Redress Proceedings’, Université Libre de Bruxelles. Available at www.beuc.org/publications/2012-00227-01-e.pdf.
Genn, H., et. al. 2006. Law in the Real World: Improving our Understanding of How Law Works. London: Nuffield Foundation.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, D. H. and Wright, J. D. 2012. ‘Behavioral Law and Economics: Its Origins, Fatal Flaws, and Implications for Liberty’, Northwestern Law Review 106: 1033.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. A. Jr. and Twerski, A. D. 1999. ‘What Europe, Japan, and Other Countries Can Learn from the American Restatement of Products Liability’, Texas International Law Journal 34: 1.Google Scholar
Hojnik, J. 2012. ‘Free Movement of Goods in a Labyrinth: Can Buy Irish Survive the Crises?’, Common Market Law Review, 49: 291.Google Scholar
Jabko, N. 2006. Playing the Market: A Political Strategy for Uniting Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Joerges, C. and Schmid, C. 2010. ‘Towards Proceduralization of Private Law in the European Multi-Level System’, in Hartkamp, A. S. et al. (eds.), Towards a European Civil Code, 4th edition. Nijmegen: Kluwer Law International, 277.Google Scholar
Jolls, C. 1998. ‘Behavioral Economics Analysis of Redistributive Legal Rules’, Vanderbilt Law Review 51: 1653.Google Scholar
Jolls, C., Sunstein, C., and Thaler, R. 1998. ‘A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics’, Stanford Law Review 50: 1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalman, L. 1996. The Strange Career of Legal Liberalism. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kaplow, L. and Shavell, S. 1994. ‘Why the Legal System Is Less Efficient than the Income Tax in Redistributing Income’, Journal of Legal Studies 23: 667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelman, M. 1979. ‘Consumption Theory, Production Theory, and Ideology in the Coase Theorem’, Southern California Law Review 52: 669.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. 1981. ‘Cost-Benefit Analysis of Entitlement Problems: A Critique’, Stanford Law Review 33: 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, D. 1987. ‘The Effect of the Warranty of Habitability on Low Income Housing: “Milking” and Class Violence’, Florida State University Law Review 15: 485.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. 1997. A Critique of Adjudication [Fin de Siècle]. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. 2001, ‘The Political Stakes in “Merely Technical” Issues of Contract Law’, European Review of Private Law 1: 7.Google Scholar
Korobkin, R. B. 2003. ‘Bounded Rationality, Standard Form Contracts, and Unconscionability’, University of Chicago Law Review 70: 1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kukovec, D. 2011. ‘Whose Social Europe? The Laval/Viking Judgments and the Prosperity Gap’. Available at www.harvardiglp.org/wp-content/uploads/Writing%20Workshop%20Papers/Kukovec_WhoseSocialEurope.pdf.
Kukovec, D. 2012. ‘A Critique of the Rhetoric of Common Interest in the EU Legal Discourse’. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2178332.
Leff, A. A. 1974. ‘Economic Analysis of Law: Some Realism about Nominalism’, Virginia Law Review 60: 451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mak, C. 2010. ‘Constitutional Aspects of a European Civil Code’, in Hartkamp, A. S. et al. (eds.), Towards a European Civil Code, 4th edition. Nijmegen: Kluwer Law International, 333.Google Scholar
Mak, C. 2013. ‘Unweaving the CESL: Legal-Economic Reason and Institutional Imagination in European Contract Law’, Common Market Law Review 50: 286.Google Scholar
Markovits, R. S. 1976. ‘The Distributive Impact, Allocative Efficiency, and Overall Desirability of Ideal Housing Codes: Some Theoretical Clarifications’, Harvard Law Review 89: 1815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattei, U. 2003. A Theory of Imperial Law: A Study on U.S. Hegemony and the Latin Resistance’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 10: 383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meili, S. 2010. ‘Consumer Protection’, in Cane, P. and Kritzer, H. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Oxford University Press, 177.Google Scholar
Micklitz, H. 2011. ‘Introduction – Social Justice and Access Justice in Private Law’, in Micklitz, H. (ed.), The Many Concepts of Social Justice in European Private Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicola, F. 2008. ‘Transatlanticisms: Constitutional Asymmetry and Selective Reception of U.S. Law and Economics in the Formation of European Private Law’, Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law 16: 87.Google Scholar
Nicola, F. 2012. ‘Invisible Cities in Europe’, Fordham International Law Journal 35: 1282.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 1999. Sex and Social Justice. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. 1944. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Posner, R. 1972. ‘A Theory of Negligence’, Journal of Legal Studies 1: 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, R. 1998. ‘Rational Choice, Behavioral Economics, and the Law’, Stanford Law Review 50: 1552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabin, E. H. 1984. ‘Revolution in Residential Landlord-Tenant Law: Causes and Consequences’, Cornell Law Review 69: 517.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Salter, J. 19 June 2006. ‘From Karl Marx to Trademarks’, Brandchannel. Available at www.brandchannel.com/brand_speak.asp?bs_id=140.
Sen, A. 1992. Inequality Reexamined. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 26 March 2009. ‘Capitalism Beyond the Crisis’, New York Review of Books.
Shleifer, A. 2005. ‘Understanding Regulation’, European Financial Management 11: 439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somek, A. 2012. ‘From Workers to Migrants, From Distributive Justice to Inclusion: Exploring the Changing Social Democratic Imagination’, European Law Journal 18: 711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiglitz, J. 2012. ‘The Book of Jobs’, Vanity Fair 54: 34.Google Scholar
Study Group on Social Justice in European Private Law 2004. ‘Social Justice in European Contract Law: A Manifesto’, European Law Journal 10: 653.
Trebilcock, M. J., et al. 2013. The Regulation of International Trade, 4th edition. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Whittaker, S. 2011. ‘The Optional Instrument of European Contract Law and Freedom of Contract’, European Review of Contract Law 7: 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, S. 2013. ‘Identifying Legal Costs of Operation of the Common European Sales Law’, Common Market Law Review 50: 85.Google Scholar
Zywicky, T. 30 September 2010. ‘In Elizabeth Warren We Trust?’, Wall Street Journal.

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×