Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-56f9d74cfd-5k9ck Total loading time: 0.649 Render date: 2022-06-27T19:29:14.267Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

8 - Sperm donors limited

Psychosocial aspects of genetic connections and the regulation of offspring numbers

from Part II - How many children per donor?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2016

Susan Golombok
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Rosamund Scott
Affiliation:
King's College London
John B. Appleby
Affiliation:
King's College London
Martin Richards
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Stephen Wilkinson
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmad, A. (2012). ‘Danish sperm donation law tightened after donor passes on rare genetic disease’. BioNews, 675.Google Scholar
Beeson, D.R., Jennings, P.K. and Kramer, W. (2011). ‘Offspring searching for their sperm donors: how family type shapes the process’. Human Reproduction, 26, 2415–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blyth, E. and Frith, L. (2009). ‘Donor-conceived people's access to genetic and biographical history: an analysis of provisions in different jurisdictions permitting disclosure of donor identity’. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 23, 174–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsten, J. (2004). After Kinship. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Curie-Cohen, M. (1980). ‘The frequency of consanguineous matings due to multiple use of donors in artificial insemination’. American Journal of Human Genetics, 32, 589600.Google ScholarPubMed
Donovan, C., Heaphy, B. and Weeks, J. (2001). Same Sex Intimacies: Families of Choice and Other Life Experiments. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Feversham (1960). Home Office and Scottish Home Department. Report of the Departmental Committee on Human Artificial Insemination. Cmnd 1105. London: HMSO.
Freeman, T. (2003). ‘Loving fathers or deadbeat dads? The crisis of fatherhood in popular culture’, in Earle, S. and Letherby, G. (eds.), Gender, Identity and Reproduction: Social Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 3349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, T., Jadva, V., Kramer, W. and Golombok, S. (2009). ‘Gamete donation: parents’ experiences of searching for their child's donor siblings and donor’. Human Reproduction, 24, 505–16.Google ScholarPubMed
Freeman, T., Appleby, J.B. and Jadva, V. (2012). ‘Identifiable donors and siblings: implications for the future’, in Richards, M., Pennings, G. and Appleby, J.B. (eds.), Reproductive Donation: Practice, Policy and Bioethics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, T., Bourne, K., Jadva, V. and Smith, V. (2014). ‘Making connections: contact between sperm donor relations’, in Freeman, T., Graham, S., Ebtehaj, F. and Richards, M. (eds.), Relatedness in Assisted Reproduction: Families, Origins and Identities. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, T. (2015). ‘Gamete donation, information sharing and the best interests of the child: an overview of the psychosocial evidence’. Monash Bioethics Review, 33, 4563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, S. (1986 [1905]). ‘Three essays on the theory of sexuality’, in Freud, A. (ed.), Sigmund Freud: The Essentials of Psychoanalysis. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Greenberg, M. and Littlewood, R. (1995). ‘Post-adoption incest and phenotypic matching: experience, personal meetings and biosocial implications’. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 68, 2944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haimes, E. (1993). ‘Issues of gender in gamete donation’. Social Science and Medicine, 36, 8593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hajnal, J. (1960). ‘Artificial insemination and the frequency of incestuous marriages’. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 182–94.
Hertz, R. and Mattes, J. (2011). ‘Donor-shared siblings or genetic strangers: new families, clans, and the internet’. Journal of Family Issues, 32, 1129–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgekiss, A. (2014). ‘Britain's top 500 UK sperm donors have “fathered” more than 6000 children between them – and some have TWENTY children each’. Daily Mail, 20th August.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA). (2011). ‘Donation review – family limit’, Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority Paper, HFEA (13/07/2011) 604.
Jadva, V., Freeman, T., Kramer, W. and Golombok, S. (2010). ‘Experiences of offspring searching for and contacting their donor siblings and donor’. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 20, 523–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jadva, V., Freeman, T., Kramer, W. and Golombok, S. (2011). ‘Sperm and oocyte donors’ experiences of anonymous donation and subsequent contact with their donor offspring’. Human Reproduction, 26, 638–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janssens, P., Nap, A. and Bancsi, L. (2011). ‘Reconsidering the number of offspring per gamete donor in the Dutch open-identity system’. Human Fertility, 14, 104–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssens, P. (2003). ‘No reason for a reduction in the number of offspring per sperm donor because of possible transmission of autosomal dominant diseases’. Human Reproduction, 4, 669–71.Google Scholar
Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2013). Donor Conception: Ethical Aspects of Information Sharing. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.
Ravitsky, V. (2012). ‘Conceived and deceived: the medical interests of donor-conceived individuals’. The Hastings Center Report, 42, 1722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sawyer, N. and Macdonald, J. (2008). ‘A review of mathematical models used to determine sperm donor limits for infertility treatment’. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 14, 411–17.Google Scholar
Sawyer, N. (2009). ‘Who's keeping count? The need for regulation is a relative matter’. Fertility and Sterility, 92, 1811–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, N. (2010). ‘Sperm donor limits that control for the ‘relative’ risk associated with the use of open-identity donors’. Human Reproduction, 5, 1089–96.Google Scholar
Scheib, J.E. and Ruby, A. (2008a). ‘Contact among families who share the same sperm donor’. Fertility and Sterility, 90, 3343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheib, J. and Ruby, A. (2008b). ‘Beyond consanguinity risk: developing donor birth limits that consider psychosocial risk factors’. Fertility and Sterility, 91, 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warnock, M. (1984). Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology. Cmnd 9314. London: HMSO.
Weston, K. (1991). Families We Choose: Lesbians, Gays, Kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990, as amended 2008.
2
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×