Akrich, M. (1992). ‘The de-scription of technological objects’, in Bijker, W.E. and Law, J. (eds.), Shaping Technology / Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Almeling, R. (2011). Sex Cells: The Medical Market for Eggs and Sperm. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bay, B., Larsen, P., Kesmodel, U. and Ingerslev, H. (2014). ‘Danish sperm donors across three decades: motivations and attitudes’. Fertility and Sterility, 101, 252–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Daniels, K., Blyth, E., Crashaw, M. and Curson, R. (2005). ‘Previous semen donors and their views regarding the sharing of information with offspring’. Human Reproduction, 20, 1670–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ernst, E., Ingerslev, H., Schou, O. and Stolenber, M. (2007). ‘Attitudes among sperm donors in 1992 and 2002: A Danish questionnaire survey’. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 86, 327–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Godman, K., Sanders, K., Rosenberg, M. and Burton, P. (2006). ‘Potential sperm donors’, recipients’, and their partners’ opinions towards the release of identifying information in Western Australia’. Human Reproduction, 21, 3022–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gottlieb, C., Lalos, O. and Lindblad, F. (2000). ‘Disclosure of donor insemination to the child: the impact of Swedish legislation on couples’ attitudes’. Human Reproduction, 15, 2052–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graham, S. (2014). ‘Stories of an absent “father”: single women negotiating relatedness through donor profiles,’ in Freeman, T., Graham, S., Ebtehaj, F. and Richards, M. (eds.), Relatedness in Assisted Reproduction: Families, Origins and Identities. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hammarberg, K., Johnson, L., Bourne, K., Fisher, J. et al. (2014). ‘Proposed legislative change mandating retrospective release of identifying information: consultation with donors and Government response’. Human Reproduction. 29, 286–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

HFEA (2011). ‘The changing landscape of donation.’ Available at www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/Factsheet-Changing_landscape_2011_02_11.pdf. Accessed 13 August 2014.Google Scholar

HFEA (2014). ‘Number of new sperm donors registering in the UK’. FOI F-2014–00182, figures requested by S. Graham under the Freedom of Information Act on 30 June 2014.Google Scholar

Hoeyer, K. (2010). ‘An anthropological analysis of European Union (EU) health governance as biopolitics: The case of the EU Cells and Tissue Directive’. Social Science and Medicine, 70, 1867–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jadva, V., Freeman, T. Kramer, W., Golombok, S. (2009). ‘The experiences of adolescents and adults conceived by sperm donation: comparisons by age of disclosure and family type’. Human Reproduction, 24, 1909–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jadva, V., Freeman, T., Kramer, W. and Golombok, S. (2010). ‘Experiences of offspring searching for and contacting their donor siblings and donor’. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 20, 523–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jadva, V., Freeman, T., Kramer, W. and Golombok, S. (2011). ‘Sperm and oocyte donors’ experiences of anonymous donation and subsequent contact with donor offspring’. Human Reproduction, 26, 638–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Janssens, P., Simmons, A., van Kooij, R., Blockzijl, E. et al. (2006). ‘A new Dutch law regulating provision of identifying information of donors to offspring: background, consent and impact’. Human Reproduction, 21, 852–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

John, E. (2010). ‘Conceivable ideas: meet the modern sperm donor’. The Observer, 27th June 2010. Available at http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2010/jun/27/jennie-withers-co-parents-fertility. Accessed 20 January 2014.Google Scholar

Jones, C. (2005). ‘Looking like a family: negotiating bio-genetic continuity in British lesbian families using donor insemination’. Sexualities, 8, 221–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirkman, M., Bourne, K., Fisher, J., Johnson, L. et al. (2014). ‘Gamete donors expectations and experiences of contact with their donor offspring’. Human Reproduction, 29, 731–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kovacs, G., Morgan, G., Levine, M. and McCrann, J. (2003). ‘Community attitudes to assisted reproductive technology: a 20 year trend’. Medical Journal of Australia, 179, 536–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lebech, P.E. (1980). ‘Present status of AID and sperm banks in Denmark,’ in David, G. and Price, W.S. (eds.), Human Artificial Insemination and Semen Preservation. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Leeton, J. (2013). The Test Tube Revolution: The Early History of IVF. Clayton: Monash University Publishing.Google Scholar

Lütticke, M. (2013). ‘No anonymity for sperm donors, court rules’. Deutsche Welle, 7 February 2013. Available at www.dw.de/no-anonymity-for-sperm-donors-court-rules/a-16582786. Accessed 13 August 2014.Google Scholar

Mamo, L. (2005). ‘Biomedicalizing kinship: sperm banks and the creation of affinity ties’. Science as Culture, 14, 237–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Manzoor, S. (2012). ‘Come inside: the world's biggest sperm bank’. The Guardian, 2 November 2012. Available at www.theguardian.com/society/2012/nov/02/worlds-biggest-sperm-bank-denmark. Accessed 13 August 2014.Google Scholar

Mohr, S. (2010). ‘What does one wear to a sperm bank? Negotiations of sexuality in sperm donation’. kuckuck.notizen zur alltagskultur, 25, 36–42.Google Scholar

Mohr, S. (2011). ‘On becoming a sperm donor: the analysis of masculinities in sperm donation,’ in Biricik, A. and Hearn, J. (eds.), GEXcel Work in Progress Report Volume XV: Proceedings from GEXcel Theme 9: Gendered Sexualed Transnationalisations, Deconstructing the Dominant: Transforming men, “centres” and knowledge/policy/practice. Linköping: LiU-tryck.Google Scholar

Mohr, S. (2014a). ‘Beyond motivation: on what it means to be a sperm donor in Denmark’. Anthropology and Medicine, 21, 162–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mohr, S. (2014b). ‘Containing sperm – managing legitimacy. Lust, disgust, and hybridity at Danish sperm banks’. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, Online First Version, doi: 10.1177/0891241614558517CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mohr, S. (2015). ‘Living kinship trouble: Danish sperm donors’ narratives of relatedness’. Medical Anthropology, 34 (5), 470–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mohr, S. and Høyer, K. (2012). ‘Den gode sædcell…An antropologisk analyse af arbejdet med sædkvalitet’. Kultur & Klasse, 113, 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nordqvist, P. (2010). ‘Out of sight, out of mind: family resemblances in lesbian donor conception’. Sociology, 44, 1128–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2013). Donor Conception: Ethical Aspects of Information Sharing. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.Google Scholar

Pennings, G. (1995). ‘Should donors have the right to decide who receives their gametes?’ Human Reproduction, 10, 2736–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pinch, T.J. and Bijker, W.E. (1984). ‘The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other’. Social Studies of Science, 14, 399–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prideangel, (2014). ‘Search profiles’. Available at http://prideangel.com/searchprofiles.aspx?bsc=1&profId=0&ptId=3&fName=null&continentId=0&cntryId=2&cntyId=0. Accessed 20 January 2014.Google Scholar

Proff.dk (2014). ‘Regnskabstal 2013’. Available at www.proff.dk/. Accessed 2 July 2014.Google Scholar

Raes, I., Ravelingien, A. and Pennings, G. (2013). ‘The right of the donor to information about children conceived from his or her gametes’. Human Reproduction, 28, 560–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Riggs, D. (2008). ‘Lesbian mothers, gay sperm donors, and community: ensuring the well-being of children and families’. Health Sociology Review, 17, 226–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riggs, D. (2009). ‘The health and well-being implications of emotion work undertaken by gay sperm donors’. Feminism and Psychology, 19, 517–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riggs, D. and Russel, L. (2011). Characteristics of men willing to act as sperm donors in the context of identity-release legislation’. Human Reproduction, 26, 266–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rodino, I.S., Burton, P.J. and Sanders, K.A. (2011). ‘Mating by proxy: a novel perspective to donor conception’. Fertility and Sterility, 96, 998–1001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Scheib, J.E., Riordan, M. and Shaver, P. (2000). ‘Choosing between anonymous and identity-release sperm donors: recipient and donor characteristics’. Reproductive Technologies, 10, 50–8.Google Scholar

Scheib, J., Riordan, M., and Rubin, S. (2003). ‘Choosing identity-release sperm donors: the parents’ perspective 13–18 years later’. Human Reproduction, 18, 1115–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sundhedsstyrelsen (2014). Humane væv og celler– årsrapport 2012, Sundhedsstyrelsen, København.Google Scholar

Van den Broeck, U., Vandermeeren, M., Vanderschueren, D., Enzlin, P., Demyttenaere, K. and D'Hooghe, T. (2013). ‘A systematic review of sperm donors: demographic characteristics, attitudes, motives and experiences of the process of sperm donation’. Human Reproduction Update, 19, 37–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Victorian Assisted Reproductive Treatment Authority (VARTA) (2013). ‘Consultation with donors who donated gametes in Victoria, Australia before 1998: access by donor-conceived people to information about donors.’ Report to The Victorian Government, May 2013. Available at www.varta.org.au/sites/default/files/public/2013%20Aug%20-%20Donor%20consultation%20full%20report.pdf. Accessed 18 January 2016.Google Scholar

Victorian Assisted Reproductive Treatment Authority (VARTA) (2014). Annual Report 2014. Available at www.varta.org.au/sites/default/files/VARTA%20Annual%20Report%202014_0.pdf. Accessed 18 January 2016.Google Scholar

Assisted Reproductive Treatment Act 2008 5(a) Victoria.Google Scholar

Infertility (Medical Procedures) Act 1984 Victoria.Google Scholar

Infertility Treatment Act 1995 Victoria.Google Scholar

Status of Children (Amendment) Act 1984 Victoria.Google Scholar

Assisted Reproductive Treatment Act 2008 5(a) Victoria.Google Scholar

Infertility (Medical Procedures) Act 1984 Victoria.Google Scholar

Infertility Treatment Act 1995 Victoria.Google Scholar

Status of Children (Amendment) Act 1984 Victoria.Google Scholar

Assisted Reproductive Treatment Act 2008 5(a) Victoria.Google Scholar

Infertility (Medical Procedures) Act 1984 Victoria.Google Scholar

Infertility Treatment Act 1995 Victoria.Google Scholar

Status of Children (Amendment) Act 1984 Victoria.Google Scholar