Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- Conventions
- List of abbreviations
- 1 The framework
- 2 Prior and current work on semantic change
- 3 The development of modal verbs
- 4 The development of adverbials with discourse marker function
- 5 The development of performative verbs and constructions
- 6 The development of social deictics
- 7 Conclusion
- Primary references
- Secondary references
- Index of languages
- Index of names
- General index
Preface and Acknowledgments
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- Conventions
- List of abbreviations
- 1 The framework
- 2 Prior and current work on semantic change
- 3 The development of modal verbs
- 4 The development of adverbials with discourse marker function
- 5 The development of performative verbs and constructions
- 6 The development of social deictics
- 7 Conclusion
- Primary references
- Secondary references
- Index of languages
- Index of names
- General index
Summary
The focus of this work is recent developments in cross-linguistic research on historical semantics and pragmatics, with special reference to the histories of English and Japanese. The framework can be characterized as “integrative functionalist” (Croft 1995) in that we consider linguistic phenomena to be systematic and partly arbitrary, but so closely tied to cognitive and social factors as not to be self-contained; they are therefore in part nonarbitrary. One of the linguist's tasks is to determine what is arbitrary, what is not, and how to account for the differences.
We see semantic change (change in code) as arising out of the pragmatic uses to which speakers or writers and addressees or readers put language, and most especially out of the preferred strategies that speakers/writers use in communicating with addressees. The changes discussed in this book are tendencies that are remarkably widely attested, but that can be violated under particular, often social, circumstances ranging from shifts in ideological values to the development of various technologies. “Regularity” is to be understood as typical change, or frequent replication across time and across languages, not as analogous to the Neogrammarian idea of unexceptionless change in phonology.
Richard Dasher takes prime responsibility for the Japanese data, Elizabeth Traugott for the remainder, but both have discussed all the material presented here in countless meetings over nearly fifteen years. The ideas presented here have been explored in several venues.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Regularity in Semantic Change , pp. xi - xiiPublisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2001
- 1
- Cited by