Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-z5d2w Total loading time: 1.642 Render date: 2021-12-01T23:13:35.790Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2018

Anja Mihr
Affiliation:
Center on Governance through Human Rights, Humboldt-Viadrina Governance Platform, Berlin
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Regime Consolidation and Transitional Justice
A Comparative Study of Germany, Spain and Turkey
, pp. 420 - 449
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abad Liceras, J.M., Ley de Memoria Histórica. La Problemática Jurídica de la Retirada o Mantenimiento de Símbolos y Monumentos Públicos (Madrid: Dykinson, 2009).Google Scholar
Abromeit, H. and Stoiber, M., Demokratien im Vergleich, Einführung in die vergleichende Analyse politischer Systeme (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 2006).Google Scholar
Abu-Nimer, M. (ed.), Reconciliation, Justice and Coexistence, Theory and Practice (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2001).Google Scholar
Agirre, J., ‘EUSKAL MEMORIA: Recovering the Memories of the Rejected People’, Politorbis, Zeitschrift für Aussenpolitik, Tenth Anniversary of the International Criminal Court: The Challenges of Complementarity (Bern: Federal Department of Foreign Affairs Switzerland, 2012).Google Scholar
Aguilar, P., ‘Transitional or Post-Transitional Justice? Recent Developments in the Spanish Case’, South European Society for Politics, 13 (2008), 417433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguilar, P., Memory and Amnesia. The Role of the Spanish Civil War in the Transition to Democracy (New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2002).Google Scholar
Aguilar, P., Balcells, L. and Cebolla-Boado, H., ‘Determinant of Attitudes Toward Transitional Justice: An Empirical Analysis of the Spanish Case’, Comparative Political Studies, 44 (2011), 13971430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmad, F., ‘Military and Politics in Turkey’ in Kerslake, C., Öktem, K. and Robins, P. (eds.), Turkey’s Engagement with Modernity. Conflict and Change in the Twentieth Century (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010), pp. 92–116.Google Scholar
Aiken, N.T., Identity, Reconciliation and Transitional Justice, Overcoming Intractability in Divided Societies, GlassHouse Book (London: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Akcam, T., Turkish National Identity and the Armenian Question (Istanbul: Iletisim Yayinlari, 1992).Google Scholar
Allen, T., ‘Restitution and Transitional Justice in the European Court of Human Rights’, Columbia Journal of European Law, 13 (2006), 146.Google Scholar
Almond, G.A. and Verba, S., The Civic Culture, Political Attitudes and Democracies in Five Nations (London/Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1989).Google Scholar
Alonso, G., ‘Children of a Lesser God: The Political and the Pastoral Action of the Spanish Catholic Church’ in Alonso, G. and Muro, D. (eds.), The Politics of Memory of Democratic Transition. The Spanish Model (New York: Routledge, 2011), pp. 113134.Google Scholar
Alonso, G. and Muro, D., The Politics and Memory of Democratic Transition. The Spanish Model (New York: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Amnesty International Spain, Briefing to Committee Against Torture (Madrid: Amnesty International Spain, 2009).
Amnesty International Spain, Amnesty International Spain, España: la obligación de investigar los crímenes del pasado y garantizar los derechos de las víctimas de desaparición forzada durante la Guerra Civil y el franquismo (Madrid: Amnesty International Spain, 2008).
Amnesty International Spain, Amnesty International Spain, España: poner fin al silencio y a la injusticia. La deuda pendiente con las victimas de la Guerra civil española y del régimen Francoista (Madrid: Amnesty International Spain, 2005).
Amnesty International Turkey, Listen to the Saturday Mothers (London: AI Index, EUR: 44/17/98, 1998).
Amnesty International Spain, Víctimas de la Guerra civil y el régimen Francoista: El desastre de los archivos, para privatización de la verdad (Madrid: Amnesty International Spain, 2006).
Andrews, M., ‘Grand National Narratives and the Project of Truth Commissions: A Comparative Analysis’, Media Culture & Society, 25 (2003), 4565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arat, Z. (ed.), Human Rights in Turkey (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arendt, H., Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (London: Penguin Books, 2006).Google Scholar
Armenian National Institute, The Applicability of the UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crimes of Genocide to Events which Occurred During the Early Twentieth Century (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, 2003).
Arnold, J., ‘Zweiter Teil. Ergebnisse im Einzelnen. 3.Bundesrepublik Deutschland/DDR’ in Esser, A., Sieber, U. and Arnold, J., Jörg, (eds.), Strafrecht in Reaktion auf Systemunrecht. Vergleichend Einblicke in Transitionsprozesse, Transitionsstrafrecht und Vergangenheitspolitik (Berlin: Max Planck Institute für ausländiches und internationales Straftrecht, 2012).Google Scholar
Assmann, J. and Czaplicka, J., ‘Collective Memory and Cultural Identity’, New German Critique, Cultural History and Studies, 65 (1995), 125133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avello, M., ‘European Efforts in Transitional Justice’, Working Paper No. 58, FRIDE, Madrid, June (2008), pp. 118.
Ayata, B., ‘Tolerance as a European Norm or an Ottoman Practice? An Analysis of Turkish Public Debates in the (Re) Opening of an Armenian Church in the Context of Turkey’s EU Candidacy and Neo-Ottoman Revival’, Working Papers – KFG, Transformation Power of Europe, 41 (2012).
Backer, D., ‘Civil Society and Transitional Justice: Possibilities, Patterns and Prospects’, Journal of Human Rights, 3 (2003), 297313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakiner, O., ‘Is Turkey Coming to Terms with Its Past? Politics of Memory and Majoritarian Conservatism’, Nationalities Papers: Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity (2013), 118.Google Scholar
De Brito, A. Barahona, Gonzaléz Enríquez, C. and Aguilar, P., The Politics of Memory: Transitional Justice in Democratizing Societies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Bar-Siman-Tov, Y. (ed.), From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar-Tal, D. and Bennink, G.H., ‘The Nature of Reconciliation as an Outcome and as a Process’ in Bar-Siman Tov, Y. (ed.), From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), pp. 1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkan, E., The Guilt of Nations, Restitution and Negotiating Historical Injustice (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Barrington, M., Jr, Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World (London: Beacon, 1993).Google Scholar
Barton, C.K.B., Restorative Justice, the Empowerment Model (Leichhardt: Hawkins Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Bauer, F., ‘Eine Grenze hat Tyrannenmacht’, Geist und Tat, 7 (1952), 194200.Google Scholar
Beetham, D., Democracy and Human Rights (Oxford: Polity Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Beetham, D., Carvalho, E., Landman, T. and Weir, S., Assessing the Quality of Democracy: A Practical Guide (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008).Google Scholar
Benson Brown, A. and Poremski, K.M. (eds.), Roads to Reconciliation, Conflict and Dia-logue in the Twenty-First Century (New York: M.E. Sharpe, 2005).Google Scholar
Bernecker, W.L., Anarchismus und Bürgerkrieg, Zur Geschichte der Sozialen Revolution in Spanien, 1936–39 (Nettersheim: Verlag Graswurzelrevolution, 2006).Google Scholar
Bernecker, W.L. and Brinkmann, S., Kampf der Erinnerungen, Der Spanische Bürgerkrieg in Politik und Gesellschaft, 1936–2008 (Nettersheim: Verlag Graswurzelrevolution, 2008).Google Scholar
Bloomfield, D., Barnes, T. and Huyse, L. (eds.), Reconciliation after Violent Conflict (Stockholm: IDEA Handbook, 2005).Google Scholar
Bloomfield, D., Fischer, M. and Schmelzle, B. (eds.), Social Change and Conflict Transformation (Berlin: Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management, 2010).Google Scholar
Bock, P., Vergangenheitspolitik im Systemwechesel. Die Politik der Aufklärung. Strafverfolgung, Disqualifizierung und Wiedergutmachung im letzten Jahren der DDR (Berlin: Logos Verlag, 2000).Google Scholar
Brady, H.E. and Collier, D. (eds.), Rethinking Social Inquiry, Diverse Tools, Shared Standards (Lanham, MD: Rowmann and Littlefield, 2004).Google Scholar
Brady, J.S., Crawford, B. and Wiliarty, S.E. (eds.), The Postwar Transformation of Germany, Democracy, Prosperity and Nationhood (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Brems, E., ‘Transitional Justice in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights’, International Journal of Transitional Justice, Oxford Journals, 5(2) (2011), 282303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brighouse, H. and Robeyns, I., Measuring Justice, Primary Goods and Capabilities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brounéus, K., Rethinking Reconciliation Concepts, Methods, and an Empirical Study of Truth Telling and Psychological Health in Rwanda (Uppsala: Uppsala University, 2008).Google Scholar
Brueckner, J., ‘Transitionasansaetze’ in Kollmorgen, R., Merkel, W. and Wagner, H.-J. (eds.), Handbuch Transformationsforschung (Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2014), pp. 8997.Google Scholar
Bühlmann, M., Merkel, W. and Wessels, B., ‘The Quality of Democracy, Democratic Barometer for Established Democracies’, National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR) Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century, Working Paper No. 10 (2008).Google Scholar
Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung (ed.), Auschwitz auf der Bühne. Peter Weiss: Die Ermittlung, in Ost und West (Bonn: Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung, 2008).
Burbidge, P., ‘Walking the Dead of the Spanish Civil War. Judge Baltasar Garzón and the Spanish Law of Historical Memory’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 9 (2011), 753–781.Google Scholar
Cairns, A., ‘Coming to Terms with the Past’ in Torpey, J. (ed.), Politics and the Past, On Repairing Historical Injustice (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2003), pp. 6390.Google Scholar
Cali, B., ‘Human Rights Discourse and Domestic Human Rights NGOs’ in Kabasakal Arat, Z. F. (ed.), Human Rights in Turkey (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007), chapter 14.Google Scholar
Campell, D.F., Barth, T.D., Plötzlbauer, P. and Plötzlbauer, G., The Quality of Democracy in the World (Vienna: Democracy Ranking; Books on Demand, 2012).Google Scholar
Campell, T., Justice (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caney, S., Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Carkoglu, A. and Kalaycioglu, E., Turkish Democracy Today: Elections, Protest and Stability in an Islamic Society (New York: International Library of Political Studies, 2007).Google Scholar
Clare, J., ‘Democratisation and International Conflict: The Impact of Institutional Legacies’, Journal of Peace Research, 44 (2007), 259276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, P. and Kaufman, Z. (eds.), After Genocide: Transitional Justice, Post-conflict Reconstruction and Reconciliation in Rwanda and Beyond (London: Hurst & Co Publisher, 2008).Google Scholar
Closa Montero, C. (ed.), Study on How the Memory of Crimes Committed by Totalitarian Regimes in Europe Is Dealt with in the Member States (Madrid: CSIC, 2010).Google Scholar
Cohen, D., ‘Transitional Justice in Divided Germany after 1945’ in Elster, J. (ed.), Retribution and Reparation in the Transition to Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 5988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, D., ‘Understanding Process Tracing’, Political Science and Politics 44, 4 (2011), 823830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, K.S., Hardin, R. and Levi, M., Cooperation Without Trust? (New York: Russell Sage Foundation Series on Trust, 2005).Google Scholar
Creswell, J.W. and Plano Clark, V.L., Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (London: Sage, 2011).Google Scholar
Croissant, A. and Merkel, W. (eds.), ‘Consolidated or Defective Democracy? Problems of Regime Change’, Democratisations, A Frank Cass Journal Special Issue, 11 (2004).Google Scholar
Dadrian, V.N. and Akçam, T., Judgement at Istanbul. The Armenian Genocide Trials (New York: Berghahn Books, 2011).Google Scholar
Dahl, R.A., On Democracy (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Dahl, R.A., Dahl, R.A., Democracy and Its Critics (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Dahl, R.A., Dahl, R.A., Polyarchy, Participation and Opposition (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Dahl, R.A., Dahl, R.A., Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, R., Gesellschaft und Demokratie in Deutschland (Munich: Piper Verlag, 1965).Google Scholar
Danyel, J. (ed.), Die geteilte Vergangenheit, Zum Umgang mit Nationalsozialismus und Widerstand in beiden deutschen Staaten (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1995).Google Scholar
Dauer, M. and Voigt, S., ‘Institutionen’ in Kollmorgen, R., Merkel, W. and Wagner, H.-J. (eds.), Handbuch Transformationsforschung (Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2014), pp. 4762.Google Scholar
Deitelhoff, N. and Wolff, K.D., ‘Business and Human Rights: How Corporate Norm Violators Become Norm Entreperneurs’ in Risse, T., Ropp, S. C. and Sikkink, K. (eds.), The Persisting Power of Human Rights. From Commitment to Compliance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 222238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demshuk, A., The Lost German East. Forced Migration and the Politics of Memory: 1945–1970 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University: www.pcr.uu.se/research/research.htm
Diamond, L., Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Diamond, L. and Morlino, L., Assessing the Quality of Democracy (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Dimitrova, A. and Pridham, G., ‘International Actors and Democracy Promotion in Central and Eastern Europe: The Integration Model and its Limits’ in Croissant, A. and Merkel, W. (eds.), Democratisations, A Frank Cass Journal, Consolidated or Defective Democracy? Problems of Regime Change, Special Issue (New York: Routledge, 2004), pp. 91132.Google Scholar
Dixon, J.M., ‘Defending the Nation? Maintaining Turkey’s Narrative of the Armenian Genocide’ in Costa Pino, A. and Morlino, L. (eds.), Dealing with the Legacy of Authoritarianism. The ‘Politics of the Past’ in Southern European Democracies (New York/London: Routledge, 2010), pp. 125143.Google Scholar
Dowe, D. (ed.), Kurt Schumacher und der ‘Neubau’ der deutschen Sozialdemokratie nach 1945, No. 13 (Bonn: Friedrich Ebert Foundation, 1996).Google Scholar
Drechsler, I. (ed.), Getrennte Vergangenheit, gemeinsame Zukunft (Munich: DTV, 1997).Google Scholar
Drumbl, M.A., Atrocity, Punishment, and International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dube, S.I., ‘Transitional Justice Beyond the Normative: Towards a Literary Theory of Political Transition’, International Journal of Transitional Justice, 5 (2011), 177197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubiel, H., Niemand ist frei von der Geschichte. Die nationalsozialistische Herrschaft in den Debatten des Deutschen Bundestages (Munich/Vienna: Hanser Verlag, 1999).Google Scholar
Dubinsky, Z., ‘The Lesson of Genocide’, Essex Human Rights Review, 2 (2005), 112117.Google Scholar
Dudouet, V. and Schmelzle, B. (eds.), Human Rights and Conflict Transformation: The Challenges of Just Peace, No. 9 (Berlin: Berghof Handbook Dialogue Series, 2010).Google Scholar
Dülffer, J., ‘Zeitgeschichte in Europa – oder europäische Zeitgeschichte’, APUZ, 1(2) (2005), 1826.Google Scholar
Easton, D., A Systems Analysis of Political Life (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1965).Google Scholar
Elster, J., Closing the Books: Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J., Offe, C. and Preuss, U.K. (eds.), Institutional Design in Post-Communist Societies, Rebuilding the Ship at Sea (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, M., ‘Has Turkey Fulfilled the Copenhagen Political Criteria?’ in Center for European Policy Studies (ed.), CEPS Policy Brief, No. 48 (2004).Google Scholar
Encarnacion, O.G., Democracy Without Justice in Spain. The Politics of Forgetting (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Errandonea, J., Estudio comparado de la anulación de sentencias injustas en España (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, 2008).Google Scholar
Escudero Alday, R., ‘El Desarrollo de la Ley de Memoria Histórica por Parte de los Poderes Públicos’ in CIRZA, Guerra Civil y Represión: Historia y Memoria (Zamora: Circulo Republicano Zamorano, 2010), pp. 105128.Google Scholar
Espindola, J., Transitional Justice after German Reunification, Exposing Unofficial Collaborators (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, R.J., Im Schatten Hitlers? Historikerstreit und Vergangenheitsbewältigung in der Bundesrepublik (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1991).Google Scholar
Falcon y Tella, M.J. and Falcon y Tella, F., Punishment and Culture, a Right to Punish? (Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feher, M., ‘Terms of Reconciliation’ in Hesse, C. and Post, R. (eds.), Human Rights in Political Transitions: Gettysburg to Bosnia (New York: Zone Books, 1999), pp. 325338.Google Scholar
Field, B.N., ‘Interparty Consensus and Intraparty Discipline in Spain’s Transition to Democracy’, in Alonso, G. and Muro, D. (eds.), The Politics of Memory of Democratic Transition. The Spanish Model (New York: Routledge, 2011), pp. 7193.Google Scholar
Fletcher, L.E. and Weinstein, H.M., ‘Violence and Social Repair: Rethinking the Contribution of Justice to Reconciliation’, Human Rights Quarterly, 24 (2002), 573639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, K.J., Schmitt, N., Schechtmann, S.L., Hults, B.M. and Dohrety, M.L., ‘Process Tracing Methods: Contributions, Problems and Neglected Research Questions’, Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Process, 43 (1989), 75–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forschungsverbund SED Staat, ‘Schüler halten Demokratien und Diktaturen für gleichwertig’ No.181/2012 (Berlin: Free University Berlin Press Realease, 2012).
Forsythe, D.P., Human Rights in International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, M., Truth Commissions and Procedural Fairness (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frei, N., Hitlers Eliten nach 1945 (Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuchverlag, 2003).Google Scholar
Frei, N. (ed.), ‘Transnationale Vergangenheitspolitik. Der Umgang mit deutschen Kriegsverbrechern’ in Europa nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg (Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag, 2002).Google Scholar
Frei, N., Brunner, J. and Goschler, C. (eds.), Die Praxis der Wiedergutmachung, Geschichte, Erfahrung und Wirkung in Deutschland und Israel (Göttingen: Wallenstein Verlag, 2009).Google Scholar
Fuchs, R. and Nolte, D., ‘Politikfeld Vergangenheitspolitik: Zur Analyse der Aufarbeitung von Menschenrechtsverletzungen in Lateinamerika’, Lateinamerika Analyse, 9 (2004), 5992.Google Scholar
Fulbrook, M., Dissonant Lives. Generations and Violence through the German Dictatorship (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulbrook, M. and Port, A. (eds.), Becoming East German, Socialist Structures and Sensibilities after Hitler, vol. 6 (Publications of the German Studies Association, 2013).
Gagel, W., Geschichte der politischen Bildung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1945–1989 (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwiessenschaften, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamio Gehri, G., ‘Reflexiones sobre el Tiempo y los Espacios de la Reconciliación’, Cua-dernos Idehpup, Instituto de Democracia y Derechos Humanos (Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2004), pp. 5266.Google Scholar
Gibney, M., Howard-Hassmann, R.E., Coicaud, J-M. and Steiner, N. (eds.), The Age of Apology, Facing Up to the Past (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Gibson, J.L., Overcoming Apartheid: Can Truth Reconcile a Divided Nation? (New York: HSPC Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Gibson, J.L., ‘The Contribution of Truth to Reconciliation, Lessons from South Africa’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50 (2006), 409432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gil Gil, A., La Justicia de Transición en España. De la Amnistía a la Memoria Histórica (Barcelona: Atelier, 2009).Google Scholar
Gilmour, D., The Transformation of Spain: From Franco to the Constitutional Monarchy (London: Quartet Books, 1985).Google Scholar
Glaser, H., 1945 Beginn einer Zukunft, Bericht und Dokumentation (Frankfurt: Fischer Verlag, 2005).Google Scholar
Glatte, S., ‘Judging the (East) German Past. A Critical Review of Transitional Justice in Post Communist Germany’, Oxford Transitional Justice Research, 5 (2011), 18.Google Scholar
Göbel, C., ‘Authoritarian Consolidation’, European Political Science, 10 (2011), 176–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godwin Phelps, T., Shattered Voices, Language, Violence and the Work of Truth Commissions (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Golob, S.R., ‘Volver: The Return of/to Transitional Justice Politics in Spain’, Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies, Special Issue (New York: New York University, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez Isa, F., ‘Retos de la justicia transicional en contextos no transicionales: El caso español’, Interamerican and European Human Rights Journal, 3 (2010), 81.Google Scholar
Goschler, C., Schuld und Schulden, Die Politik der Wiedergutmachung für NS-Verfolgte seit 1945 (Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag, 2005).Google Scholar
Govier, T. and Verwoerd, W., ‘Trust and the Problem of National Reconciliation’, Philosophy and Social Sciences, 32 (2002), 178205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gready, P., The Era of Transitional Justice: The Aftermath of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa and Beyond (New York: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
de Greiff, P., ‘Transitional Justice, Security, and Development, Security and Justice Thematic Paper’, World Development Report 2011, Background Paper, 2010.
Grodsky, B., ‘Re-Ordering Justice: Towards a New Methodological Approach in Studying Transitional Justice’, Journal of peace research, 46 (2009), 819837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groehler, O., ‘Der Holocaust in der Geschichtsschreibung der DDR’ in Moltmann, B. et al. (eds.), Erinnerung, Zur Gegenwart des Holocaust in Deutschland West und Deutschland Ost (Frankfurt am Main: Arnoldsheimer Texte, Haag und Herchen Verlag, 1993), pp. 4763.Google Scholar
Guckes, U., ‘Opferentschädigung nach zweierlei Mass? Eine vergleichende Untersuchung der gesetzlichen Grundlagen der Entschädigung für das Unrecht der NS-Diktatur und der SED-Diktatur’, Berliner Wissenschaftsverlag, 33 (2008), 33.Google Scholar
Gunther, R., Diamandouros, P.N. and Puhle, H.-J. (eds.), The Politics of Democratic Consolidation. Southern Europe in Comparative Perspective (London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Gunther, R., Montero, J. Ramón and Botella, J., Democracy in Modern Spain (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Gurr, T.R., Jagger, K. and Moore, W., ‘The Transformation of the Western State: The Growth of Democracy, Autocracy, and State Power since 1800’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 25(1) (1990), 73–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J., ‘Justice and Solidarity’, Philosophical Forum, 21 (1989), 3253.Google Scholar
Hague Institute for International Law, Measuring Access to Justice in a Globalising world (Utrecht: HiiL/Tilburg University/Utrecht University, 2010).
Hale, W. and Özbudun, E., Islamism, Democracy and Liberalism in Turkey: The Case of the AKP (New York: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Hall, P., ‘Political Science and the Three New Institutionalism’, Political Studies, 4(55) (1996), 936957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, T.O., ‘Transitional Justice: Towards a Differentiated Theory’, Oregon Review of International Law, 13 (2011), 1–48.Google Scholar
Hanshew, K., Terror and Democracy in West Germany (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, P. and Reilly, B. (eds.), Democracy and Deep-Rooted Conflict: Option for Negotiators (Stockholm: Handbook Series IDEA, 1998).Google Scholar
Hassemer, W., Strafrechtliche Aufarbeitung von Diktaturvergangenheit Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte (Bonn: Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, APuZ 3536, 2011), pp. 4854.Google Scholar
Hayner, P.B., Unspeakable Truths, Facing the Challenges of Truth Commissions (New York/London: Routledge, 2002).Google Scholar
Hazan, P., Judging War, Judging History. Behind Truth and Reconciliation (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Hazan, P., Hazan, P., Measuring the Impact of Punishment and Forgiveness: A Framework for Evaluating Transitional Justice’, International Review of the Red Cross, 88 (2006), 1947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heberer, P. and Matthäus, J. (eds.), Atrocities on Trial, Historical Perspectives on the Politics of Prosecuting War Crimes (Washington, DC: US Holocaust Memorial Museum, 2008).Google Scholar
Henderson, J. and Wakeham, P. (eds.), ‘Colonial Reckoning, National Reconciliation?: Aboriginal Peoples and the Culture of Redress in Canada’, ESC: English Studies in Canada, 35(1) (2009), 1–26.Google Scholar
Heper, M. and Güney, A., ‘The Military and the Consolidation of Democracy: The Recent Turkish Experience’, Armed Forces and Security, 26 (2000), 635657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herf, J., Divided Memory: The Nazi Past in the Two Germanys (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Herrmann, G., ‘Documentary’s Labours of Law: The Television Journalism of Montse Armengou and Ricard Belis’, Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies. Special Issue (New York: New York University Press, 2008), 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgin, N. and Pearce, C. (eds.), ‘The GDR Remembered, Representation of the East German State since 1989in Studies in German Literature, Linguistic and Culture Studies (New York: Peter Lang, 2011).Google Scholar
Holmes, L., Post Communism: An Introduction (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Hölscher, C., NS-Verfolgte im ‘antifaschistischen Staat’, Vereinnahmung und Ausgrenzung in der ostdeutschen Wiedergutmachung (1945–1989) (Berlin: Metropol Verlag, 2002).Google Scholar
Horne, C.M., ‘Assessing the Impact of Lustration on Trust in Public Institutions and National Government in Central and Eastern Europe’, Comparative Political Studies, 45(4) (2001), 439–440.Google Scholar
Horowitz, S. and Schnabel, A., ‘Human Rights and Societies in Transition: International Context and Sources of Variation’ in Horowitz, S., and Schnabel, A. (eds.), Human Rights and Societies in Transition (New York: United Nations University Press, 2004), pp. 325.Google Scholar
Humlebaek, C., ‘The “Pacto de Olvido”’ in Alonso, G. and Muro, D. (eds.), The Politics of Memory of Democratic Transition. The Spanish Model (New York: Routledge, 2011), pp. 183198.Google Scholar
Humlebaek, C., Humlebaek, C., ‘Party Attitudes Towards the Authoritarian Past in Spanish Democracy’ in Costa Pinto, A. and Morlino, L. (eds.), Dealing with the Legacy of the Authoritarianism. The Politics of the Past in Southern European Democracies (New York: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Humrich, C., ‘Critical Theory’ in Schneider, S. and Spindler, M. (eds.), Theories of International Relations (London: Routledge, 2014), pp. 260271.Google Scholar
Huntington, S.P., The Clash of Civilization and the Remaking of World Order (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996).Google Scholar
Huntington, S.P., Huntington, S.P., The Third Wave. Democratisation in the Late Twentieth Century (Oklahoma, OK: Oklahoma University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Huntington, S.P., Huntington, S.P., ‘How Countries Democratise’, Political Science Quarterly, 106 (1992), 579616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingelhart, R. and Welzel, C., Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Institute für Demoskopie Allensbach, Das Dritten Reich: eine Studie über Nachwirkungen des Nationalsozialismus, Gesellschaft zum Studium der öffentlichen Meinung (Allensbach am Bodensee: Institute für Demoskopie Allensbach, 1949).
Institute für Demoskopie Allensbach, Das Einstellung in aussenpolitischen Fragen. Ergebnisse repräsentativer Bevölkerungsumfragen des Instituts für Demoskopie, 1957–1960 (Allensbach am Bodensee: Institute für Demoskopie Allensbach, 1960).
Institute für Demoskopie Allensbach, Demokratie-Verankerung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Eine empirische Untersuchung zum 30 jährigen Bestehen der Bundesrepublik (Allensbach am Bodensee: Institute für Demoskopie Allensbach, 1979).
Institute für Demoskopie Allensbach, Der 8. Mai und die Deutschen. Ergebnisse einer Repräsentativumfrage im Auftrag des Bundespresseamts (Allensbach am Bodensee: Institute für Demoskopie Allensbach, 1985).
Institute für Demoskopie Allensbach, Der 20. Juli 1944. Ergebnisse einer Bevölkerungs-Umfrage über das Attentat auf Hitler (Allensbach am Bodensee: Institute für Demoskopie Allensbach, 1970).
Institute für Demoskopie Allensbach, Deutsche und Juden, vier Jahrzehnt danach. Eine Repräsentativbefragung im Auftrag des STERN (Allensbach am Bodensee: Institute für Demoskopie Allensbach, 1986).
Institute für Demoskopie Allensbach, Die öffentliche Resonanz der Entnazifizierung. Ergebnisse von Bevölkerungsumfragen. September 1948 und November 1953. Gesellschaft zum Studium der öffentlichen Meinung (Allensbach: Institute für Demoskopie Allensbach, 1954).
Institute für Demoskopie Allensbach, Wiederstand im Drittem Reich. Wissen und Urteil der Bevölkerung vor und nach dem 40. Jahrestag des 20. Juli 1944 (Allensbach am Bodensee: Institute für Demoskopie Allensbach,1985).
International Crisis Group, ‘Turkey and Armenia: Opening Minds, Opening Borders’, Europe Report, 199 (2009), 12.
Jarausch, K.H., Die Umkehr. Die Deutsche Wandlungen 1945–1995 (Munich: DVA, 2004).Google Scholar
Jaspers, K., Die Schuldfrage, Für Völkermord gibt es keine Verjährung (Munich: Piper Verlag, 1979).Google Scholar
Jenkins, G., Context and Circumstance: The Turkish Military and Politics (New York: Routledge, 2005).Google Scholar
Judt, T., Postwar. A History of Europe Since 1945 (London: Penguin Books, 2005).Google Scholar
Jureit, U. and Schneider, C., Gefuehlte Opfer, Illusionen der Vergangenheitsbewaeltigung (Stuttgart: Klett Cotta, 2010).Google Scholar
Kaase, M. and Newton, K., Beliefs in Government, Vol. V (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Kaminski, M.M. and Nalepa, M., ‘Judging Transitional Justice: A New Criterion for Evaluating Truth Revelation Procedures’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50 (2006), 383407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kästner, A., ‘Autokratieförderung’ in Kollmorgen, R., Merkel, W. and Wagner, H.-J. (eds.), Handbuch Transformationsforschung (Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2014), pp. 493498.Google Scholar
Ka-ying Wong, T., Po-san, W. and Hsiao Hsin-Huang, M., ‘The Bases of Political Trust in Six Asian Societies: Institutional and Cultural Explanations Compared’, International Political Science Review, 32 (2011), 263281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keane, J., Life and Death of Democracy (London: Simon & Schuster, 2009)Google Scholar
Kellerhoff, S.F., Learning from History – A Handbook for Examining Dictatorships (Berlin: Gedenkstaette Hohenschoenhausen, Beier + Wellach, 2013)Google Scholar
Kerslake, C., Oktem, K. and Robins, P. (eds.), Turkey’s Engagement with Modernity; Conflict and Change in the Twentieth Century (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, G., Keohane, R.O. and Verba, S., Designing Social Inquiry, Scientific Interference in Qualitative Research (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Kirchheimer, O., Politische Justiz, Verwendung juristischer Verfahrensmöglichkeiten zu politischen Zwecken (Frankfurt am Main: Europäische Verlagsgesellschaft, 1981).Google Scholar
Kleßmann, C., Die doppelte Staatsgründung, Deutsche Geschichte 1945–1955 (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 1991).Google Scholar
Kneuer, M., Demokratisierung durch die EU, Süd- und Ostmitteleuropa im Vergleich (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knigge, V. and Frei, N. (eds.), Verbrechen erinnern, Die Auseinandersetzung mit Holocaust und Völkermord (Bonn: Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung, 2005), pp. 362378.Google Scholar
Knutsen, C.H., ‘Measuring Effective Democracy’, International Political Science Review, 31 (2010), 109128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohl, H., Erinnerungen 1982–1990 (Munich: Droemer Verlag, 2005).Google Scholar
Kohler-Koch, B., Conzelmann, T. and Knodt, M., Europäische Integration – Europäisches Regieren (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kollmorgen, R., ‘Mondernisierungstheoretische Ansaetze’ in Kollmorgen, R., Merkel, W. and Wagner, H.-J. (eds.), Handbuch Transformationsforschung (Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2014), pp. 7788.Google Scholar
Kredourie, S., Turkey: Identity, Democracy, Politics (London: Routledge, 2014).Google Scholar
Kreiser, K. and Neimann, C.K., Kleine Geschichte der Türkei (Stuttgart: Reclam, 2003).Google Scholar
Kriesberg, L., Constructive Conflicts: From Escalation to Settlement (New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 1998), pp. 329331.Google Scholar
Kristjansdottir, E., Nollkaemper, A. and Ryngaert, C., ‘Introduction’ in ibid. (eds.), International Law in Domestic Courts: Rule of Law Reform in Post-Conflict States, Vol. IX (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2012), pp. 115.Google Scholar
Kritz, N. J. (ed.), Transitional Justice, How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes, Volume I General Considerations; Volume II Country Studies; Vol. III Laws, Rulings and Reports (Washington, DC: United States Institute for Peace, 2004).Google Scholar
Kritz, N.J., ‘Policy Implications of Empirical Research on Transitional Justice’ in Van der Merwe, H., Baxter, V. and Chapman, A. R. (eds.), Assessing the Impact of Transitional Justice: Challenges for Empirical Research (Washington, DC: USIP Press, 2009), pp. 1322.Google Scholar
Kurban, D., Reparation and Displacement in Turkey, Lessons Learned from the Compensation Law, Case Studies on Transitional Justice and Displacement, Brookings-LSE Project on Internal Displacement (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, 2012).Google Scholar
Kymlicka, W., Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Lambach, D., ‘Legitimitaet’ in Kollmorgen, R., Merkel, W. and Wagener, H.-J. (eds.), Handbuch Transformationsforschung (Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2014), pp. 599604.Google Scholar
Lamont, C.K., International Criminal Justice and the Politics of Compliance (Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2010).Google Scholar
Lauth, H.-J., ‘Die Qualität der Demokratie im interregionalen Vergleich – Probleme und Entwicklungsperspektiven’ in Pickel, G. and Pickel, S. (eds.), Demokratisierung im internationalem Vergleich, Neue Erkenntnisse und Perspektiven (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 2006), pp. 89110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauth, H.-J. and Liebert, U., Im Schatten demokratischer Legitimität (Opladen/Wiesbaden: Sozialwissenschaftlicher Verlag, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lederach, J.P., Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies (Washington, DC: United States Institute for Peace Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Leebaw, B.A., ‘The Irreconcilable Goals of Transitional Justice’, Human Rights Quarterly, 30(1) (2008), 95118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leide, H., NS-Verbrecher und Staatssicherheit, Die geheime Vergangenheitspolitik der DDR (Göttingen: Vandenhoek and Ruprecht, 2005).Google Scholar
Levitsky, S. and Way, L.A., Competitive Authoritarianism, Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenstein, H. and Romberg, O.R. (eds.), Täter-Opfer-Folgen. Der Holocaust in Geschichte und Gegenwart (Frankfurt am Main: TRIBÜNE Zeitschrift zum Verständnis des Judentums, 1995).Google Scholar
Liebert, U., Modelle demokratischer Konsolidierung (Opladen: Leske und Budrich, 1998).Google Scholar
Liebert, U., Liebert, U., Neue Autonomiebewegung und Dezentralisierung in Spanien. Der Fall Andalusien (Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag, 1986).Google Scholar
Lijphart, A., Democracies, Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-one Countries (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, A., Lijphart, A., Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999), pp. 275305.Google Scholar
Linz, J.J., ‘Crisis, Breakdown, and Reequilibration’, in: Linz, J.J. and Stepan, A. (eds.), The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press1978).Google Scholar
Linz, J.J. and Stepan, A., Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe (Baltimore, MD/London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Linz, J.J. and Stepan, A., Linz, J.J. and Stepan, A., Toward Consolidated Democracies’, in Diamond, Larry and Plattner, Marc F., Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies, Themes and Perspectives (Baltimore, MD/London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996), pp. 1433.Google Scholar
Lipset, S.M., Political Man (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Lipset, S.M., Lipset, S.M., ‘Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy’, American Political Science Review, 53(1959), 69105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, K., Savage Continent, Europe in the Aftermath of World War II (London: Penguin Books, 2013).Google Scholar
Ludi, R., Reparations for Nazi Victims in Post-war Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdams, J.A., Judging the Past in Unified Germany (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
McAdams, J.A., McAdams, J.A., ‘Communism on Trial: The East German Past and the German Future’, in McAdams, J.A. (ed.), Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1997), pp. 239267.Google Scholar
McAdams, J.A., McAdams, J.A., ‘Reappraising the Conditions of Transitional Justice in Unified Germany’, East European Consititutional Review, 54 (2001), 53–59.Google Scholar
McAdams, J.A. (ed.), Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1997).Google Scholar
McEvoy, K. and McGregor, L. (eds.), Transitional Justice from Below, Grassroots Activism and the Struggle for Change (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008).Google Scholar
McLaren, L.M., Constructing Democracy in Southern Europe. A Comparative Analysis of Italy, Spain and Turkey (London/New York: Routledge, 2008).Google Scholar
McMahon, P.C. and Forsythe, D.P., ‘The ICTY’s Impact on Serbia: Judicial Romanticism Meets Network Politics’, Human Rights Quarterly, 30 (2008), 412435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magone, J.M., ‘The Role of the EEC in the Spanish, Portuguese and Greek Transition’ in Alonso, G. and Muro, D. (eds.), The Politics of Memory of Democratic Transition. The Spanish Model (New York: Routledge, 2011), pp. 215236.Google Scholar
Manier, J.C., ‘La cultura de la transición o la transición como cultura’ in Molinero, C. (ed.), La transición: treinta años después de la dictadura a la instauración y consolidación de la democracia (Barcelona: Ediciones Península, 2006), pp. 153–171.Google Scholar
Marxen, K., Werle, G. and Shäfter, P., Die Strafverfolgung von DDR Unrecht. Fakten und Zahlen (Berlin: Humboldt University Berlin and Stiftung Aufarbeitung DDR Diktatur, 2007).Google Scholar
Mazzuca, S.L., ‘Access to Power Versus Exercise of Power, Reconceptualizing the Quality of Democracy in Latin America’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 45 (2010), 334357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendez, J.E., ‘In Defence of Transitional Justice’ in McAdams, J.A. (ed.), Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2001), pp. 126.Google Scholar
Merkel, W., Systemtransformation (Oplanden: Leske & Budrich UTB, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkel, W., Merkel, W., Systemtransformation (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 2008).Google Scholar
Merkel, W., Merkel, W., Systemtransformation, Eine Einführung in die Theorie und Empirie der Transformationsforschung, 2nd edition (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 2010).Google Scholar
Merkel, W. and Puhle, H.-J., Von der Diktatur zur Demokratie, Transformationen, Erfolgsbedingungen, Entwicklungspfade (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkel, W. and Wagener, H.-J., ‘Akteure’ in Kollmorgen, R., Merkel, W. and Wagner, H.-J. (eds.), Handbuch Transformationsforschung (Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2014), pp. 6374.Google Scholar
Merkel, W., Puhle, H.-J., Croissant, A., Eicher, C. and Thiery, P., Defekte Demokratie (Opladen: Leske und Budrich Publisher, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkel, W., Sandschneider, E. and Sengert, D. (eds.), Systemwechsel 2, Die Institutionalisierung der Demokratie (Opladen: Leske und Budrich, 1996).Google Scholar
Merritt, A.J. and Merritt, R.L., Public Opinion in Semisovereign Germany: The HICOG Surveys, 1949–1955 (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Mihr, A., Amnesty International in der DDR. Menschenrechte im Visier der Stasi (Berlin: Links Verlag, 2002).Google Scholar
Mihr, A., Mihr, A., ‘Human Rights in Europe: Origins, Institutions, Policies and Perspectives’ in Seidelmann, R. and Vasilache, A. (eds.), European Union and Asia, A Dialogue on Regionalism and Interregional Cooperation, Transformation, Development, and Regionalisation in Greater Asia (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2008), pp. 197220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mihr, A., Mihr, A., ‘Transitional Justice and the Quality of Democracy: From Democratic Institution Building to Reconciliation’ in Mihr, A. (ed.), Transitional Justice: Between Criminal Justice, Atonement and Democracy (Utrecht: SIM – Netherlands Institute of Human Rights-Utrecht University, 2012), pp. 1152.Google Scholar
Mihr, A., Mihr, A., ‘Turkey, Transitional Justice and Reconciliation’ in Lavinia, S. and Nedelsky, N. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Transitional Justice, Vol. 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Mihr, A., Mihr, A., ‘Das Internationale Jahr zur Aussöhnung 2009’, Zeitschrift für die Vereinten Nationen, 1 (2010), 2126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mihr, A., Mihr, A., ‘From Reconciliation to the Rule of Law and Democratisation’, Web Journal of Current Legal Issues, 1 (2009). Online at: http://webjcli.ncl.ac.uk/2009/issue1/mihr1.html (last accessed December 2010).Google Scholar
Mihr, A., Mihr, A., ‘Transitional Justice and the Quality of Democracy’, International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 7(2) (2013), 298313.Google Scholar
Mihr, A., Mihr, A., ‘Why Holocaust Education Is Not Always Human Rights Education’, Journal of Human Rights, 16(4) (2015), 525544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minow, M., Between Vengeance and Forgiveness, Facing History after Genocide and Mass Violence (Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Mitchell, C.R., ‘Conflict, Social Change and Conflict Resolution. An Enquiry’, in Bloomfield, D., Fischer, M. and Schmelzle, B. (eds.), Social Change and Conflict Transformation (Berlin: Berghof Handbook Dialogue Series, 2010), pp. 1336.Google Scholar
Molinero, C. (ed.), La Transición, Treinta Años Despues de la Dictatura a la Instauracion y Consolidacion de la Democracia (Barcelona: Atalaya, 2006).Google Scholar
Monedero, J.C., La transición contada a nuestros padres. Nocturno de la democracia española (Madrid: Catrata, 2011).Google Scholar
Morlino, L., ‘Authoritarian Legacies, Politics of the Past and the Quality of Democracy in Southern Europe: Open Conclusions’ in Costa Pinto, A. and Morlino, L. (eds.), Dealing with the Legacy of Authoritarianism: The ‘Politics of the Past’ in Southern European Democracies (New York: Routledge, 2011), 507–529.Google Scholar
Morlino, L., Morlino, L., Democracy between Consolidation and Crisis; Parties, Groups and Citizens in Southern Europe (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morlino, L., Morlino, L., ‘What Is a “Good” Democracy?’ in Croissant, A. and Merkel, W. (eds.), Democratisations, A Frank Cass Journal; Consolidated or Defective Democracy? Problems of Regime Change, Special Issue (New York: Routledge, 2004), pp. 1032.Google Scholar
Morell, M.E., ‘Survey and Experimental Evidence for a Reliable and Valid Measure of Internal Political Efficacy’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 67 (2003).Google Scholar
Munck, G., ‘Ten Fallacies About Qualitative Research’, Qualitative Methods, Newsletter of the American Political Science Association, 3(1) (2005), 25.Google Scholar
Munck, G. and Verkuilen, J., ‘Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy’, Comparative Political Studies, 35(1) (2002), 534.Google Scholar
Muro, D., ‘The Basque Experience of Transition to Democracy’ in Alonso, G. and Muro, D. (eds.), The Politics and Memory of Democratic Transition. The Spanish Model (New York/London: Routledge, 2011), pp. 159181.Google Scholar
Murphy, C., A Moral Theory of Political Reconciliation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myrdal, G., Rich Lands and Poor: The Road to World Prosperity, World Perspectives Edition, Vol. XVI (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1957).Google Scholar
Naef, M. and Schupp, J., Measuring Trust. Experiments and Surveys in Contrast and Combination (Bonn: IZA, 2009).Google Scholar
Nalepa, M., Skeletons in the Closet: Transitional Justice in Post-Communist Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, V., Bienestar Insuficiente, Democracia Incompleta (Barcelona: Anagrama, 2009).Google Scholar
Neubert, E., Geschichte der Opposition in der DDR 1949–1989 (Forschungen zur DDR-Gesellschaft) (Berlin: Christoph Links Verlag, 1998).Google Scholar
Newton, K. and Norris, P., ‘Confidence in Public Institutions: Faith, Culture, or Per-formance?’ in Pharr, S. J. and Putnam, R. D. (eds.), Disaffected Democracies, What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries? (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Neyi, L., ‘Oral History and Memory Studies in Turkey’ in Kerslake, C., Öktem, K. and Robins, P. (eds.), Turkey’s Engagment with Modernity, Conflict and Change in the Twentieth Century (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).Google Scholar
Nohlen, D. and Hildebrand, A., Spanien, Wirtschaft – Gesellschaft, Politik, Ein Studienbuch (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag 2005).Google Scholar
O’Donnell, G., ‘Delegative Democracy’, Journal of Democracy, 5 (1994), 5569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, G. and Schmitter, P., Transition from Authoritarian Rule. Prospects for Democracy, Parts I–IV (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
O’Donnell, G., Schmitter, P. and Whitehead, L., Transition from Authoritarian Rule, Southern Europe (Baltimore, MD/London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
O’ Donnell, G., Vargas Cullell, J. and Iazeetta, O.M., The Quality of Democracy, Theory and Applications (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2004).Google Scholar
O’Pendas, D., The Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial, 1963–1965: Genocide, History, and the Limits of the Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
O’Shea, A., Amnesty for Crime in International Law and Practice (London: Kluwer Law International, 2004).Google Scholar
Offe, C., Herausforderungen der Demokratie, Zur Integrations- und Leistungsfähigkeit politischer Institutionen (Frankfurt/New York: Campus Verlag, 2003).Google Scholar
Offe, C., Offe, C., Varieties of Transition: The East European and East German Experience (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Offe, C. (ed.), Demokratisierung der Demokratie, Diagnosen und Reformvorschläge (Frankfurt, New York: 2003).Google Scholar
Offe, C. and Poppe, U., ‘Transitional Justice in the German Democratic Republic and in Unified Germany’ in Elster, J. (ed.), Retribution and Reparation in the Transition to Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 239–269.Google Scholar
Öktem, K., Angry Nation. Turkey Since 1989 (London: Zen Books, 2011).Google Scholar
Olivo, C., Creating a Democratic Civil Society in Eastern Germany: The Case of the Citizen Movements and Alliance 90 (New York: Palgrave, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, T.D., Payne, L.A. and Reiter, A.G., Transitional Justice in Balance, Comparing Processes, Weighing Efficacy (Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace, 2010).Google Scholar
Oran, B., ‘The Minority Concept and Rights in Turkey: The Laussane Peace Treaty and Current Issues’ in Kabasakal Arat, F.Z. (ed.), Human Rights in Turkey (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007), pp. 3536.Google Scholar
Özbudun, E. and Türkmen, F., ‘Impact of the ECtHR Rulings in Turkey’s Democratisation: An Evaluation’, Human Rights Quarterly, 35(4) (2013), 9851008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, M., From the Burden of the Past to Societal Peace and Democracy. Coming to Terms with the Past: Why?, When?, How? (Istanbul: Heinrich Böll Foundation, 2007).Google Scholar
Parlevliet, M., ‘Rethinking Conflict Transformation from a Human Rights Perspective’ in Dudouet, V. and Schmelzle, B. (eds.), Human Rights and Conflict Transformation: The Challenges of Just Peace (Berlin: Berghof Handbook Dialogue, 2010), pp. 1546.Google Scholar
Parsons, T., Social System (New York: Routledge, 1951).Google Scholar
Pendas, D.O., The Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial, 1963–1965: Genocide, History and the Limits of the Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Pendas, D.O., Pendas, D.O., ‘Seeking Justice, Finding Law: Nazi Trials in Postwar Europe’, Journal of Modern History, 81 (2008), 347368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez Ledesma, M., ‘“Nuevos” y “Viejos” movimientos sociales en la transicion’ in Molinero, C. (ed.), La transición: treinta años después de la dictadura a la instauración y consolidación de la democracia (Barcelona: Ediciones Península, 2006), pp. 117–126.Google Scholar
Petersen, T., Freiheit und bürgerschaftliches Engagement. Ergebnisse einer Repräsentativumfrage im Auftrag der Herbert Quandt-Stiftung (Bad Homburg: Herbert Quandt-Stiftung, 2012).Google Scholar
Petersen, T., Hierlemann, D., Vehrkamp, R.E. and Wratli, C., Gespalten Demokratie. Politische Partizipation und Demokratiezufriedenheit vor der Bundestagswahl (Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2013).Google Scholar
Pham, P. and Vinck, P., ‘Empirical Research and the Development and Assessment of Transitional Justice Mechanisms’, International Journal of Transitional Justice, 1 (2007), 231248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philipps, D.L., Diplomatic History. The Turkey-Armenia Protocols (New York: Columbia University Institute for the Study of Human Rights, 2012).Google Scholar
Phillips, D.L., Unsilencing the Past: Track Two Diplomacy and Turkish-Armenian Reconciliation (Oxford: Berhang Books, 2005).Google Scholar
del Pino, E. and Colino, C., ‘National and Subnational Democracy in Spain: History, Models and Challenges’, Working Paper No. 7, Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos, IPP, Madrid (2010).
Plogsted, S., Knasmauke: Das Schicksal von politischen Häftlingen der DDR nach der deutschen Wiedervereinigung (Giessen: Psychosizial – Verlag, 2010).Google Scholar
Powell, G.B., ‘The Chain of Responsiveness’, Journal of Democracy, 5(4) (2004), 91105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, S., A Problem from Hell; America and the Age of Genocide (New York: Harper Collins Publisher, 2002).Google Scholar
Priban, J., Roberts, P. and Young, J. (eds.), System of Justice in Transition, Central European Experience Since 1989 (Farnham, UK: Ashgate, 2003).Google Scholar
Pridham, G., Designing Democracy, EU Enlargement and Regime (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pridham, G., Pridham, G., The Dynamics of Democratisation: A Comparative Approach (London/New York: Continuum, 2000).Google Scholar
Primor, A. and von Korff, C., An Allen sind die Juden und die Radfahrer Schuld (Munich: Piper Verlag, 2010).Google Scholar
Putnam, R.D., Making Democracy Work, Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Putnam, R.D., Pharr, S.J. and Dalton, R.J., ‘Introduction: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Democracies?’ in Pharr, S.J. and Putnam, R.D. (eds.), Disaffected Democracies, What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries? (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000), pp. 327.Google Scholar
Quiroga, A., ‘Salvation by Betrayal: The Left and the Spanish Nation’ in Alonso, G. and Muro, Diego (eds.), The Politics of Memory of Democratic Transition. The Spanish Model (New York: Routledge, 2011), pp. 135158.Google Scholar
Rabb, T.K. and Suleiman, E.N. (eds.), The Making and Unmaking of Democracy; Lessons From History and World Politics (New York/London: Routledge, 2003).Google Scholar
Radcliff, P.B., Making Democratic Citizens in Spain. Civil Society and the Popular Origins of the Transition, 1960–1978 (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011).Google Scholar
Rafti, M., ‘A Perilous Path to Democracy, Political Transition and Authoritarian Consolidation in Rwanda, Discussion Paper’, Institute of Development Policy and Management, IOB, University of Antwerp, Discussion Paper (2008).
Ragin, C.C., The Comparative Method; Moving Beyond Qualitative Strategies (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Rau von Koester, J., The Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict between Armenia and Azerbaidsan: A Brief Historical Outline (Berlin: Verlag, 2008).Google Scholar
Rawls, J., Theory of Justice (Boston, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Reichel, P., Vergangenheitsbewältigung in Deutschland. Die Auseinandersetzung mit der NS-Diktatur von 1945 bis heute (Munich: C.H. Beck Verlag, 2001).Google Scholar
Ridao, J.M., ‘Democracy and the Past’ in Politorbis, Zeitschrift für Aussenpolitik, Tenth Anniversary of the International Criminal Court: The Challenges of Complementary (Bern: Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, 2012).Google Scholar
Roche, D., Accountability in Restorative Justice, Clarendon Studies in Criminology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Rock, P., Constructing Victims’ Rights: The Home Office, New Labour and Victims (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigo, J., Cautivos, Campos de Concentración en la España Franquista, 1936–1947 (Barcelona: Critica, S.L., 2005).Google Scholar
Rohrschneider, R., ‘Institutional Quality and Perceptions of Representation in Advanced Industrial Democracies’, Comparative Political Studies, 38 (2005), 850874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, R., Understanding Post-Communist Transformation: A Bottom Up Approach (London: Routledge, 2009).Google Scholar
Rosoux, V., ‘Human Rights and the Work of Memory in International Relations’, Journal of Human Rights, 3 (2004), 159170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, M.H., ‘Ritual and the Politics of Reconciliation’ in Bar-Siman-Tov, Y. (ed.), From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), pp. 197223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotberg, R.I. and Thompson, D. (eds.), Truth Versus Justice: The Morality of Truth Commissions (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rustow, D.A., ‘Transition to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model’, Comparative Politics, 2(3) (1970), 337363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabrow, M. and Mentel, C. (eds.), Das Auswärtige Amt und seine umstrittene Vergangenheit. Eine deutsche Debatte (Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 2014).Google Scholar
Sa’adah, A., Germany’s Second Chance. Trust, Justice, and Democratisation (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Sancar, M., ‘Coming to Terms with the Past in Turkey: Being Realistic, Asking for the Im-possible’ in Heinrich Böll Foundation, (ed.), From the Burden of the Past to Societal Peace and Democracy (Istanbul: Heinrich Böll Foundation, 2007), pp. 2936.Google Scholar
Sánchez León, P., ‘Radicalism Without Representation, on the Character of Social Movements in the Spanish Transition to Democracy’ in Alonso, G. and Muro, D. (eds.), The Politics and Memory of Democratic Transition. The Spanish Model (New York/London: Routledge, 2011), pp. 95–111.Google Scholar
Sarkin, J. and Daly, E., ‘Too Many Questions, Too Few Answers: Reconciliation in Transitional Societies’, Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 35 (2004), 101168.Google Scholar
Sarotte, M.E., The Collapse. The Accidental Opening of the Berlin Wall (New York: Basic Books, 2014).Google Scholar
Satana, N.S., ‘Transformation of the Turkish Military and the Path to Democracy’, Armed Forces and Society, 34 (2008), 357388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaap, A., Political Reconciliation (New York: Routledge, 2005).Google Scholar
Schabas, W., An Introduction to the International Criminal Court (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabas, W. and Darcy, S., Truth Commissions and Courts: The Tension Between Criminal Justice and the Search for the Truth (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001).Google Scholar
Schlee, B., Die Macht der Vergangenheit. Demokratisierung und politischer Wandel in einer spanischen Stadt (Baden Baden: Nomos, 2008).Google Scholar
Schmädeke, P.C., Politische Regimewechsel, Grundlagen der Transitionsforschung (Tübingen/Basel: A. Francke Verlag, UTB, 2012).Google Scholar
Schmidt, M.G., Demokratietheorien, Eine Einführung (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 2006).Google Scholar
Schmidt, P. (ed.), Kleine Geschichte Spaniens (Stuttgart: Reclam, 2004).Google Scholar
Schmitter, P.C., ‘An Introduction to Southern European Transition’ in O’Donnell, G., Schmitter, P.C. and Whitehead, L. (eds.), Transition from Authoritarian Rule. Southern Europe (Baltimore, MD/London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Schmitter, P.C., Schmitter, P.C., The Quality of Democracy: The Ambiguous Virtues of Accountability (Florence: European University Institute, 2003).Google Scholar
Schmitter, P.C., Schmitter, P.C., ‘The Quality of Democracy: The Ambiguous Virtues of Accountability’, Journal of Democracy, 15(4) (2004), 4790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitter, P.C. and Guilhot, N., ‘From Transition to Consolidation, Extending the Concept of Democratisation and Practice of Democracy’, Geojournal Library: Democratic and Capitalist Transition in Eastern Europe, 55 (2000), 131146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneckener, U., ‘Models of Ethnic Conflict Regulations: The Politics of Recognition’ in Schneckener, U. and Wolff, S. (eds.), Managing and Settling Ethnic Conflicts (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), pp. 1839.Google Scholar
Schneider, C. and Schmitter, P., ‘Liberalisation, Transition and Consolidation: Measuring the Components of Democratisation’ in Croissant, A. and Merkel, W. (eds.), Democratisations, A Frank Cass Journal; Consolidated or Defective Democracy? Problems of Regime Change, Special Issue (New York: Routledge, 2004), pp. 59–90.Google Scholar
Schniter, E., Sheremeta, R.M. and Sznycer, D., ‘Restoring Damaged Trust with Promises, Atonement and Apology’, Capman University, University of California, 22 December 2011. ssm.com/abstract=1975976 (last accessed February 2014).
Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M., Kühberger, A. and Ranyard, R., ‘The Role of Process Data in the Development and Testing of Process Models of Judgement and Decision Making’, Judgement and Decision Making, 6(8) (2011), 733739.Google Scholar
Schweizer, G., Die Türkei – Zerreißprobe zwischen Islam und Nationalismus (Stuttgart: Klett Cotta, 2008).Google Scholar
Senghaas, D., Von Europa Lernen Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Betrachtungen (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1982).Google Scholar
Senghaas, D., Senghaas, D., Zum irdischen Frieden (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2004).Google Scholar
Seufert, G. and Kubaseck, C., Die Türkei, Politik, Geschichte, Kultur (Munich: Beck Verlag, 2004).Google Scholar
Seyhan, B., Politik und Erinnerung. Der Völkermord an den Armenien (Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, 2010).Google Scholar
Sikkink, K., and Booth Walling, C., ‘The Impact of Human Rights Trials in Latin America’, Journal of Peace Research, 44 (2007), 427445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikkink, K., The Justice Cascade. How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2011).Google Scholar
Silva, E., Las fosas de Franco: Crónica de un desagravio, Temas de hoy (Madrid: Historia Selección, 2005).Google Scholar
Simmons, B.A., Mobilizing for Human Rights, International Law in Domestic Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skaar, E. and Dahl, A.J.R., Dealing with Violent Past. The Impact of Transitional Justice (Bergen: CMI, CHR, Michael Institute, 2012).Google Scholar
Skapska, G., ‘Moral Definitions of Constitutionalism in East Central Europe, Facing Past Human Rights Violations’, International Sociology, 18 (2003), 199218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P.J., ‘Cinema and Television in the Transition’ in Alonso, G. and Muro, D. (eds.), The Politics and Memory of Democratic Transition. The Spanish Model (New York/London: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Sontheimer, K., Antidemokratisches Denken in der Weimarer Republik, Studienausgabe mit einem Extrateil, Antidemokratisches Denken in der Bundesrepublik (Munich: Nymphenburger Verlagshandlung, 1968).Google Scholar
Spinner-Halev, J., ‘Education, Reconciliation and Nested Identities’, Theory and Research in Education, 1 (2003), 5172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinner-Halev, J., Spinner-Halev, J., ‘From Historical to Enduring Injustice’, Political Theory, 35 (2007), 574597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sriram, C.L., Confronting Past Human Rights Violations: Justice vs. Peace in Times of Transition (New York: Frank Cass, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stan, L. (ed.), Transitional Justice in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union, Reckoning with the Communist Past (New York: Routledge, 2008).Google Scholar
Stan, L. and Nedelsky, N., Encyclopaedia of Transitional Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Stanley, E., ‘Evaluating the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’, Journal of Modern African Studies, 39 (2011), 505546.Google Scholar
Steinbach, P., ‘Vergangenheit als Last und Chance: Vergangenheitsbewaeltigung in den 50er Jahren’ in Weber, J. (ed.), Die Bundesrepublik wird souveraen 1950–1955 (Munich: BLpB, 1998), pp. 333373.Google Scholar
Strang, H., Repair of Revenge: Victims and Restorative Justice, Clarendon Studies in Criminology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Sweeney, J.A., The European Court of Human Rights in the Post Cold War Era. Universality in Transition (London/New York: Routledge Research in Human Rights Law, 2013).Google Scholar
Tamarit Sumalla, J.M., ‘Historical Memory and Criminal Justice in Spain’, Series on Transitional Justice, 14 (2013), 371–374.Google Scholar
Tamarit Sumalla, J.M., Tamarit Sumalla, J.M., ‘Transition, Historical Memory and Criminal Justice in SpainJournal of International Criminal Justice, 9 (2001), 731.Google Scholar
Tanaka, J., Japan’s Comfort Women: Sexual Slavery and Prostitution During World War II and the US Occupation (London: Routledge, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C., Multiculturalism, Examining the Politics of Recognition (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Teitel, R., Globalizing Transitional Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teitel, R., Teitel, R., ‘How Are the New Democracies of the Southern Cone Dealing with the Legacy of Past Human Rights Abuses?’ in Kritz, N. (ed.), Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes, Vol. 1 (Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace, 2004), pp. 146153.Google Scholar
Teitel, R., Teitel, R., Transitional Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).
Teitel, R., Teitel, R., ‘Transitional Justice Globalised’, International Journal of Transitional Justice, 2 (2008), 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ther, P., Die dunkle Seite der Nationalstaaten. Ethnische Säuberungen im modern Europa (Göttingen: Vandenhoek and Ruprecht, 2011).Google Scholar
Thompson, J., Taking Responsibility for the Past, Reparation and Historical Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Thoms, O.N.T., Ron, J. and Paris, R., The Effects of Transitional Justice: A Summary of Empirical Research Findings and Implications for Analysts and Practitioners (Ottawa: CIPS Working Paper, 2008).Google Scholar
Thoms, O.N.T., Ron, J. and Paris, R., Thoms, O.N.T., Ron, J. and Paris, R., ‘State-Level Effects of Transitional Justice: What Do We Know?’, International Journal of Transitional Justice, Special Issue: Transitional Justice on Trial – Evaluating Its Impact, 4 (2010), 329354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilburg Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies of Civil Law and Conflict Resolutions Systems (TISCO) (ed.), A Handbook for Measuring the Costs and Quality of Access to Justice (Appeldorn/Antwerpen/Portland: Tilburg Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies of Civil Law and Conflict Resolution Systems, 2009).
Tilly, C., Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Timm, A., ‘Alles umsonst? Verhandlungen zwischen der Claims Conference und der DDR über “Wiedergutmachung” und Entschädigung’, Hefte zur DDR Geschicht, 32 (1996).Google Scholar
Tiryaki, S. and Akgün, M. (eds.), The Heybeliada Talks: Two Years of Public Diplomacy on Cyprus, Global Political Trends Center (Istanbul: Istanbul Kültür University, 2011).Google Scholar
Torgler, B., ‘Trust in International Organizations: An Empirical Investigation Focusing on the United Nations’, Review of International Organizations, 3 (2008), 6593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torpey, J. (ed.), Politics and the Past, On Repairing Historical Injustice (Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2003).Google Scholar
Turan, I., Turkey’s Difficult Journey to Democracy: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Türkmen, F., ‘Turkey’s Participation in Global and Regional Human Rights Regime’ in Kabasakal Arat, Z. F. (ed.), Human Rights in Turkey (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007), pp. 249–261.Google Scholar
Ungör, U., The Making of Modern Turkey (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ure, M., ‘Post-Traumatic Societies: On Reconciliation, Justice and the Emotion’, European Journal of Social Theory, 11 (2008), 283297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ustundag, E., Government Should Apologize for Enforced Disappearances (Istanbul, 2009). www.bianet.org/english/human-rights/118902-governments-should- apologize-for-enforced-disappearancesGoogle Scholar
Usul, A.R., Democracy in Turkey: The Impact of EU Political Conditionality (London: Routledge, 2010).Google Scholar
Van der Merwe, H., Baxter, V. and Chapman, A.R. (eds.), Assessing the Impact of Transitional Justice: Challenges for Empirical Research (Washington, DC: USIP Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Vanhanen, T., Democratisation. A Comparative Analysis of 170 Countries (London: Routledge, 2003).Google Scholar
Vetik, R., ‘Multiculturalism as a Model for Democratic Consolidation’ in Schlosser, D-B. and Veik, R. (eds.), Perspectives on Democratic Consolidation in Central and Eastern Europe (East European Monographs, 2001), pp. 2230.Google Scholar
Viaene, L. and Brems, E., ‘Transitional Justice and Cultural Contexts: Learning from the Universality Debate’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 28 (2010), 199224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villa-Vicencio, C. and Doxtader, E. (eds.), The Provocations of Amnesty, Memory, Justice and Impunity (Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Vinyes, R. (ed.), El Estado y la Memoria, Gobiernos y Ciudadanos Frente a los Traumas de la Historia, Direcció General de la Memoria Democratica de la Generalitat de Catalunya (Barcelona: Groupo RBA, 2009).Google Scholar
Voigt, S., ‘Values, Norms, Institutions and Prospects for Economic Growth in Central and Eastern Europe’ in Pejovich, S. (ed.), The Economics of Property Rights II (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1996), pp. 303337.Google Scholar
Vollnhals, C., Entnazifierung. Politische Säuberung und Rehabilitierung in den vier Besatzungszonen 1945–1949 (Munich: dtv Verlag, 1991).Google Scholar
von Beyme, K., Systemwechsel Osteuropa (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1994).Google Scholar
Von Bruinessen, M., ‘Genocide in Kurdistan? The Suppression of the Dersim Rebellion in Turkey (1937–1938) and the Chemical War Against the Iraqi Kurds (1988)’ in Andrepoulos, G.J. (ed.), Conceptual and Historical Dimensions of Genocide (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994), pp. 141170.Google Scholar
von Saldern, A., ‘Öffentlichkeit in Diktaturen, Zu den Herrschaftspraktiken in Deutschland des 20. Jahrhunderts’ in Heydemann, G. and Oberreuter, H. (eds.), Diktature in Deutschland – Vergleichsperspektive, Strukturen, Institutionen und Verhaltensweise (Bonn: Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung, 2003), pp. 442475.Google Scholar
Von Weizsäcker, R., Drei Mal Stunde Null? 1949, 1969, 1989. Deutschland europäische Zukunft (Berlin: Siedler Verlag, 2001).Google Scholar
Weber, H., Die DDR 1945–1990: Oldenbourg-Grundriss der Geschichte, No. 20 (Oldenburg: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, 2011)Google Scholar
Weiffen, B., ‘Der vergessene Faktor – Zum Einfluss von Transitional Justice auf die Entwicklung von Rechtsstaatlichkeit in Demokratisierungsprozessen’, Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft (Comparative Governance and Politics), 5 (2011), 5174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingardt, M.A., Deutsche Israel- und Nahostpolitik. Die Geschickte einer Gratwanderung seit 1949 (Frankfurt am Main/Munich: Campus Verlag, 2002).Google Scholar
Weinke, A., ‘West Germany: A Case of Transitional Justice, Avant La Lettre?’ in Wouters, N. (ed.), Transitional Justice and Memory in Europe (1945–2013) (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2014), pp. 2561.Google Scholar
Welzel, C., ‘Effective Democracy, Mass Culture, and the Quality of Elites: The Human Development Perspective’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 43 (2002), 317349.Google Scholar
Welzer, H., ‘Der Holocaust im deutschen Familiengedächtnis’ in Knigge, V. and Frei, N. (eds.), Verbrechen erinnern, Die Auseinandersetzung mit Holocaust und Völkermord (Bonn: Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung, 2005), pp. 362378.Google Scholar
Wentker, H., Justiz in der SBZ/DDR 1945–1953: Transformation und Rolle ihrer zentralen Institutionen, Veröffentlichungen zur SBZ-/DDR-Forschung im Institut für Zeitgeschichte (Oldenburg: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werle, G., ‘Der Holocaust als Gegenstand der bundesdeutschen Strafjustiz’, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 45(40) (1992), 25292535.Google Scholar
Whitehead, L., Democratisation, Theory and Experience (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, L. (ed.), The International Dimensions of Democratisation, Europe and the Americas (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Wiebelhaus-Brahm, E., Truth Commissions and Transitional Justice: The Impact on Human Rights and Democracy (New York/London: Routledge, 2010).Google Scholar
Wiesel, E., ‘Preface’, in Phillips, D.L., Unsilencing the Past: Track Two Diplomacy and Turkish-Armenian Reconciliation (Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2005).Google Scholar
Wildenthal, L., The Language of Human Rights in West Germany (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Wilson, R.A., The Politics of Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa: Legitimising the Post Apartheid State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R.A., Wilson, R.A., ‘Anthropological Studies of National Reconciliation Processes’, Anthropological Theory, 3 (2003), 367387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, S., Transitional Justice in Established Democracies, A Political Theory, International Political Theory (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, S., Winter, S., ‘Towards a Unified Theory of Transitional Justice’, Journal of Transitional Justice, 1 (2013), 121.Google Scholar
Wippman, D., ‘Atrocities, Deterrence, and the Limits of International Justice’, Fordham International Law Journal, 23 (2000), 473488.Google Scholar
Wolfrum, E., Die geglückte Demokratie, Geschichte der Bundesrepublik Deutschland von ihren Anfängen bis zur Gegenwart (Bonn: Klett Cotta, 2007).Google Scholar
Woolpert, S., Slation, C.D. and Schwerin, E.W. (eds.), Transformational Politics, Theory, Study and Practice (New York: State University of New York Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Yavuz, H.M. (ed.), The Emergence of a New Turkey, Democracy and the AK Parti (Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Young Civilians and Human Rights Agenda Association (HRAA) (ed.), Ergenekon Is Our Reality (Ankara: HRAA, 2010).
Zajac Sonnerholm, R., Rule of Law after War and Crisis, Ideologies, Norms and Methods (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2012).Google Scholar
Zapf, W., ‘Mondernisierungstheorien in der Transformationsforschung’ in von Beyme, K. and Offe, C. (eds.), Politische Theorien in der Ära der Transformation, PVS Sonderheft, No. 26 (Opladen, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 1996), pp. 169181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zielonka, J., ‘The Quality of Democracy after Joining the European Union’, East European Politics and Societies, 21 (2007), 162180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archive Historical Memory, Salamanca. Campaign materials. Archive of Historical Memory, Salamanca. Caja: 1598, 1601.
BA-136 Bundeskanzleramt – 175
BA-136 Bundeskanzleramt – 504
BA-136 Bundeskanzleramt – 1745
B-136 Bundeskanzleramt – 1880
B-136 Bundeskanzleramt – 3173
B-136 Bundeskanzleramt – 3314
BA-136 Bundeskanzleramt – 3801
BA-136 Bundeskanzleramt – 3904
B-136 Bundeskanzleramt – 4369
BA-136 Bundeskanzleramt – 4404
BA-136 Bundeskanzleramt – 4406
BA-136 Bundeskanzleramt – 4689
BA-136 Bundeskanzleramt – 4698
BA-136 Bundeskanzleramt – 4699
Bundesarchiv B 136–4960
Federal Archives Germany (Bundesarchiv, Koblenz).
Federal Archives Germany. GDR Department for Reparation DC 2.
Federal Archives Germany (Bundesarchiv, Berlin).
Federal Archives Salamanca.
Federal Republic of Germany, Federal Law (Bürgerliches Gesetzblatt, BGBl.) 1950.
Fundación Francisco Franco, Archive. Documento de trabajo para la preparación de una asociación política. 3Rd version. January 1975. Fiche 10109, Madrid.
German Democratic Republic Department for Reparation (Amt für Reparation) BA-DC 2 652.
German Democratic Republic Executive Board of the Victims of National Socialism (Zentraler Parteivorstand VVD (Verein Verfolgter des Nationalsozialismus) DY 55/ V 2 78/ ½.
German Democratic Republic Institute for Marxism and Leninism, SED Government, Dept. of Law (Institut für Marxismus Leninismus beim ZK der SED, Bestand Staat und Recht) BA-DY/ 30/ IV 2/ 13–431; -432 and DY/30/IV A 2/ 13–30.
German Federal Archive GDR. Executive Board of the Victims of National Socialism (Zentraler Parteivorstand VVD) (Verein Verfolgter des Nationalsozialismus) DY 55/V278/1/2.
Baltasar Garzón. 6 May 2011, Madrid.
Emilio Silva Barrera. 8 May 2011, Madrid.
Luis Fernando Parra Galindo. 11 May 2011, Madrid.
Martin Gutzeit, Federal Commissioner for the Stasi Files in the State of Berlin. Berlin, June 2015.
Orhan Kemal Cengiz. 20 April 2011, Ankara.
Paco Etxeberría: Forensic Institute University of San Sebastian during excavations of mass graves from Civil War. Puerto de la Mazorra close to Burgos. 7 May 2011.
Beethman, David, IDEA, Democracy Assessment: www.idea.int
Bertelsmann Transformation Index 2012, Turkey Country Report BTI, Gütersloh 2012 bti-project.org and bertelsmann-transformation-index.de
Center for the Study of Global Governance, Global Civil Society Reports; www.lse.ac.uk/Depts/global/index.htm
Council of Europe, Brincat Report – Need for International Condemnation of the Franco Regime, for Debate in the Standing Committee. Doc. 10737, 4 November 2005.
Democracy Barometer, ‘Germany: Basic Facts 2007’. Center for Democracy Studies Aarau. www.democracybarometer.org (August 2013).
Democracy Barometer,. ‘Spain: Basic Facts 2007’. Center for Democracy Studies Aarau. www.democracybarometer.org (August 2013).
Democracy index 2012, ‘Democracy at a standstill’. A Report from The Economist Intelligence Unit: www.eiu.com (last accessed November 2014).
Democracy Ranking Association, Quality of Democracy Ranking 2015, http://democracyranking.org/wordpress/
The EpochTimes, ‘Turkey’s President Defends Armenian Apology Campaign’, www.theepochetimes.com, 18 December 2008.
European Parliament, Debate No. 4: 70 years after General Franco’s coup d’etat in Spain (Statements by the President and the political groups, Strasbourg, 4 July 2006).
European Union, Eurobarometer Surveys. Germany 1990. http://ec.europa.eu (August 2013).
European Union, Eurobarometer Surveys. Spain 2013. http://ec.europa.eu (August 2013).
Freedom House, www.freedomhouse.org (last accessed July 2016).
The Guardian, ‘Spain finally attempts to lay ghosts of the Franco era’, 20 July 2006. www.guardian.co.uk (August 2013).
The Guardian, ‘Turkey’s coup attempt’, www.theguardian.com/world/turkey-coup-attempt (August 2016).
Hurriyete Daily Newspaper, English version: http://web.hurriyetdailynews.com/. 6 April 2011.
Hürriyet Daily News, ‘Armenian apology denounced by gov’t’, 6 June 2011.
International Center for Transitional Justice, www.ictj.org/en/tj/.
International Center for Transitional Justice, What is Transitional Justice, 2009. Online paper: http://ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-Global-Transitional-Justice-2009-English.pdf (October, 2013).
International Herald Tribune, ‘Nearly a million Armenians, veiled by amnesia’, 10 March 2009, p. 3.
Manifestación de las víctimas del franquismo en la Puerta del Sol (Madrid) todos los jueves en la Puerta del Sol, Madrid de 20 a 21 horas. www.tercerainformaciñon.es (August 2013).
MetroPoll, Awareness of Oscar’s and the Armenian Issue, March 2010, www.metropoll.com.tr (August 2013).
MetroPoll, Turkey’s Pulse ‘The New Resolution Process’, Strategical and Social Research.
Center Ankara, April 2013, slide no. 18, www.metropoll.com.tr (August 2013).
MetroPoll, Strategical and Social Research Center, Leaders and Public Trust in Institutions, Ankara, Januar 2013, www.metropoll.com.tr (August 2013).
Marschall, M.G. and Cole, B.R.. Global Report 2011. State Fragility Index and Ma-trix 2010. Center for Systematic Peace. www.systemicpeace.org/polity (August 2013).
El Mundo, ‘Congreso de los Diputados: Todos los grupos parlamentarios, excepto el PP home-najean a los represaliados del franquismo’. 1 December 2003. www.elmundo.es
NCCR Democracy Barometer for Established Democracies, National Center of Competences in Research, Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century, Zürich; www.nccr-democracy.uzh.ch/nccr/knowledge_transfer/ip14
El País, ‘España suma casi 250.000 nuevos nacionales gracias a la “ley de nietos”’, 30 March 2012. http://politica.elpais.com
El País, ‘En busca de un Valle de los Caídos’, 8 June 2011. www.memoriahistorica.org.es
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, ‘In the aftermath of Hrant Dink’s Murder’. Doc.11187, 20 February 2007.
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, Written Declaration No. 147 Democracy and Human Rights in Turkey. Doc. 5690, 28 January 1987.
Polity IV Project, Turkey Authority Trends 1946–2010. Center for Systematic Peace www.systemicpeace.org/polity (August 2013).
Portada de Pares, Spanish Archives: http://pares.mcu.es
Portal de Víctimas de la Guerra Civil y Represaliados del Franquismo: http://pares.mcu.es/víctimasGCFPortal (May 2011).
Süddeutsche Zeitung, ‘Noch sind Mörder unter uns’, 11 July 1958.
Der Tagesspiegel, 4 March 1960.
La Vanguardia, ‘El Parlamento condena el franquismo’. 21 November 2001.
La Vanguardia, ‘El PP se suma “sin reservas” a la condena del Parlamento al franquismo’. 14 December 2000.
La Vanguardia, ‘El Valle de los Caídos dejará de ser un templo de exaltación del franquismo’. 18 October 2007.
Convention (I) for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field. Geneva, 12 August 1949.
Straffreiheitsgesetz, 31 December 1949, BGB1, German Civic Penal Code.
Gesetzblatt der DDR, German Democratic Republic, 18 February 1950, Nr. 14.
Spain Law 46/1977, Ley de amnistia, 15 October 1977, Gazette nº248, 17 October 1977, pp. 22765–22766, Reference BOE-A-1977–24937.
Second Protocol of the Hague Convention of 1954 for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, 26 March 1999. (Art. 38.)
European Court for Human Rights (ECtHR), Court Chamber, Case of Loizidou versus Turkey, Application no. 15318/89, Judgment, Strasbourg, 18 December 1996.
ECtHR, Case of Streletz, Kessler and Krenz versus Germany, Appl. Nos 34044/96, 35532/97 and 4480/98, Judgment, Strasbourg, 22 March 2001.
UN Human Rights Committee, General Comment No.31 The nature of the general obligation imposed on State Parties to the Convenant. Doc.CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.13, 26 May 2004.
Council of Europe, Parliamentary Assembly. Need for international condemnation of the Franco regime. Report, Political Affairs Committee. Doc. 10737, 4 November 2005.
UN-General Assembly, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on the report of the Third Committee (A/60/509/Add.1) 60/147. Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law, UN Doc A/Res/60/147, March 2006.
UN General Assembly, International Year of Reconciliation, 2009, 61st session, UN Doc A/61/L.22, 13 November 2006.
UN-General Assembly, International Year of Reconciliation, 2009, Addendum, 61st session, UN Doc A/61/L.22/Add.1, 20 November 2006.
UN Doc A/HRC/24/42 Human Rights Council, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrences, Pablo de Greiff, Geneva and New York, Twenty-fourth session, 28 August 2013.
UN Human Rights Council, Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence, Pablo de Greiff, Doc. A/HRC/21/46, 9 August 2012.
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), 2006. Rule-of-Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Mapping the Justice Sector, HR/PUB/06/2, New York and Geneva: United Nations.
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), 2006. Rule-of-Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Prosecution Initiatives, HR/PUB/06/4, New York and Geneva: United Nations.
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), 2006. Rule-of-Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Truth Commissions, HR/PUB/06/1, New York and Geneva: United Nations.
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), 2006. Rule-of-Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Vetting, an Operational Framework, HR/PUB/06/5, New York and Geneva: United Nations.
Tribunal Supremo España. Sala de lo Militar. Sentencia, Recurso, Revisión Penal. No 106/2004. Sentencia: 19 February 2007.
Spain Law 52/2007, Ley de la Memoria, concerning those who suffered persecution or violence during the Civil War and the Dictatorship, 26 December 2007, Gazette nº 310, 27 December 2007, pp. 53410–53416, Reference BOE-A-2007–22296.
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), 2008. Rule-of-Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Reparations Programmes, HR/PUB/08/1, New York and Geneva: United Nations.
UN Human Rights Committee, ICCPR, Consideration of Report Submitted by State Parties un-der Article 40 of the Convenant, Concluding observations of the Human Rights Committee, Spain, 94th session, Geneva 13–31 October 2008. Doc. CCPR/C/ESP/CO/5, Geneva, 5 January 2009.
UN Committee Against Torture (CAT), UN Doc. CAT/C/ESP/Q/5/Add.1 New York, 22 September 2009.
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), 2009. Rule-of-Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesties, HR/PUB/09/1, New York and Geneva: United Nations.
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), ‘Spain: The State must assume a leadership role and engage more actively to respond to the demands of the relatives of the disappeared’, Press Release, Madrid, 30 September 2013. www.ohchr.org/ (last accessed January 2014).
UNDP Human Development Reports, http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr2002/
UN World Development Report (WDR) (2011), Conflict, Security and Development, New York: United Nations.PubMed
Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence. Doc. A/HRC/21/46, 9 August 2012.