Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd4964975-4wks4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-03-28T19:44:05.636Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2021

Edited by
Sophia Xenophontos  and
Anna Marmodoro
Sophia Xenophontos
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Anna Marmodoro
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Reception of Greek Ethics in Late Antiquity and Byzantium , pp. 249 - 274
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Purchase

Buy Book

Buy print or eBook[Opens in a new window]

References

Primary Sources

Alexander, P. (ed.), 1962, In Ecclesiasten Homilae, Gregorii Nysseni Opera V , Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A. H. (ed. and trans.), 1966–88, Plotinus. Enneads, Cambridge MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Barkley, G. (ed.), 1990, Origen, Homilies on Leviticus, Fathers of the Church, Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Behr, J. (ed. and trans.), 2017, Origen: On First Principles, Oxford Early Christian Studies, 2 vols., Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benakis, L. (ed.), 2008, Michael Psellos: Kommentar zur Physik des Aristoteles, Athens: Academy of Athens.Google Scholar
Beneker, J. and Gibson, C. A. (trans.), 2016, The Rhetorical Exercises of Nikephoros Basilakes: Progymnasmata from Twelfth-century Byzantium, Dumbarton Oaks Medieval Library, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bernardi, J., (ed.), 1992, Grégoire de Nazianze. Discours 42–43, Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf .Google Scholar
Bouffartigue, J. and Patillon, M. (eds.), 1977 and 1979, Porphyre: De l’abstinence, vols. 1–2 (Collection des universités de France), Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. (ed.), 2005, Porphyre. Sentences, 2 vols. Histoire des doctrines de l’antiquité classique, XXXIII, Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. and Flamand, J.-M., 2005, ‘Sentence 32: Notes’, in Brisson, L. (ed.), Porphyre: Sentences, vol. 2, Paris: Vrin, 628–42.Google Scholar
Brooks, F. (ed. and trans.), 1896, Marci Tullii Ciceronis; De natura deorum, London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Burnet, I. (ed.), 1907, Platonis Opera, 5 vols., Oxford Classical Texts, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Busse, A. (ed.), 1895, Ammonii In Aristotelis Categorias commentarius, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 4.4, Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Busse, A. (ed.), 1898, Philoponi (olim Ammonii) in Aristotelis Categorias Commentarium. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 13.1, Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Busse, A. (ed.), 1900, Eliae in Porphyrii Isagogen et Aristotelis Categorias commentaria, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 18.1, Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Butterworth, G. W. (ed. and trans.), 1966, Origen: On First Principles, New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Bywater, I. (ed.), 1886, Prisciani Lydi quae extant: Metaphrasis in Theophrastum et solutionum ad Chosroem liber, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, Suppl. 1.2, Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Bywater, I. (ed.), 1894 (repr. 1962), Aristotelis Ethica Nicomachea, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Callahan, J. (ed.), 1992, De oratione dominica, Gregorii Nysseni Opera VII, 2, Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Catapano, G. (ed.), 2006, Plotino. Sulle virtù (I.2 [19]), Pisa: Plus.Google Scholar
Chase, F., 1958, ‘An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith’, in Saint John of Damascus: Writings, New York: Fathers of the Church.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. and Helmbold, W. (trans.), 1957, Plutarch, Moralia, vol. XII, Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chitty, D. (ed. and trans.), 1975, The Letters of St. Antony the Great, Oxford: SLG Press.Google Scholar
Clark, G., 2000, Porphyry: On Abstinence from Killing Animals, London, New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Clarke, E. C., Dillon, J. andHershbell, J. P. (eds.), 2003, Iamblichus. De mysteriis, Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. M. and Matthews, G. (trans.), 1991, Ammonius: On Aristotle’s Categories, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Constas, M. (ed. and trans.), 2014, On Difficulties in the Church Fathers. The Ambigua, 2 vols., Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. (ed.), 1997, Plato: Complete Works, Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Courtonne, Y. (ed.), 1957–66, Saint Basile. Lettres, 3 vols., Collection des Universités de France, Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Crombie, F. (ed.), 1885, ‘Against Celsus’, in Roberts, A., Donaldson, J. and Coxe, A. C. (eds.), Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 6, Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing.Google Scholar
Crouzel, H., 1989, Origen, Worrall, A. S. (trans.), Edinburgh: T and T Clark.Google Scholar
Darrouzès, J. (ed.), 1970, Georges et Dèmètrios Tornikès: Lettres et discours, Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Declerck, J. (ed.), 1982, Quaestiones et dubia, Corpus Christianorum, Series Graeca 10, Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Deferrari, R. (trans.), 1950, Saint Basil, The Letters, Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Diehl, E. (ed.), 1903–6, Procli Diadochi in Platonis Timaeum commentaria, 3 vols., Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Diels, H. (ed.), 1892, Simplicii In Aristotelis physicorum libros quattuor priores, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 9, Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Diels, H., (ed.), 1895, Simplicius In Aristotelis physicorum libros quattuor posteriores Commentaria in Aristotelica Graeca 9, Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. (ed. and trans.), 1973, Iamblichi Chalcidensis in Platonis dialogos commentariorum fragmenta, Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. (trans.), 2005, ‘Porphyry, Pathways to the Intelligible’, in Brisson (ed.), L., Porphyre. Sentences, vol. 2, Histoire des doctrines de l’antiquité classique, XXXIII, Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 795–835.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. and Polleichtner, W. (eds. and trans.), 2009, Iamblichus of Chalcis: The Letters, Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Drossaart Lulofs, H. J. (ed.), 1965, Aristotelis De generatione animalium, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Duffy, J. M. (ed.), 1992, Philosophica Minora I, Stuttgart/Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Emlyn-Jones, Ch. and Preddy, W (eds. and trans.), 2013, Plato. Republic, 2 vols., Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Failler, A. and Laurent, V. (eds.), 1984–2000, Georges Pachymérès, Relations historiques, Corpus fontium historiae Byzantinae XXIV/1–5, Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Finamore, J. F. and Dillon, J. M. (eds. and trans.), 2002, Iamblichus De Anima: Text, Translation and Commentary, Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fyrigos, A. (ed.), 1998, Barlaam Calabro Opere contro i Latini, vol. 2, Studi e Testi 348, Vatican City: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana.Google Scholar
Gadra, T. A., et al. (eds.), 1989, George Pachymeres, Commentary on Plato’s Parmenides [Anonymous Sequel to Proclus’ Commentary], Corpus philosophorum Medii Aevi. Philosophi Byzantini 4, Athens: Academy of Athens.Google Scholar
Gallay, P. (ed.), 1978, Grégoire de Nazianze. Discours 27–31, Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar
Gauthier, R. A. and Jolif, J. Y. (trans.), 1970, Aristote. L’Éthique à Nicomaque. Introduction, traduction et commentaire. T. II, 2, Brussels-Paris: Nauwelaerts.Google Scholar
Gautier, P. (ed.), 1975, ‘Theodore Prodomus: Epithalamium fortunatissimis caesaris filiis’, in Nicéphore Bryennios. Histoire, Corpus fontium historiae Byzantinae, Brussels: Byzantion, 341–55.Google Scholar
Gertz, S. (trans.), 2018, Elias and David: Introductions to Philosophy; Olympiodorus: Introduction to Logic, London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Goldwyn, A. J. and Kokkini, D. (trans.), 2015, Allegories of the Iliad: John Tzetzes, Dumbarton Oaks Medieval Library, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gregg, R. (ed. and trans.), 1980, Athanasius: The Life of Antony and the Letter to Marcellinus. New York: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
Guillaumont, A. (ed.), 1971, ´Evagre le Pontique, Traité pratique ou Le Moine, Paris: Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar
Guillaumont, A. and Guillaumont, C. (eds.), 1989, Évagre le Pontique. Le gnostique ou à celui qui est devenu digne de la science [Sources chrétiennes 356], Paris: Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar
Hammond, M. (ed.), 2006, Marcus Aurelius: Meditations, New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hayduck, M. (ed.), 1891, Alexandri Aphrodisiensis in Aristotelis Metaphysica commentaria, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 1, Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Hayduck, M. (ed.), 1897, Ioannis Philoponi in Aristotelis de anima libros commentaria, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 15, Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Hayduck, M. (ed.), 1907, Eustratii in Analyticorum Posteriorum librum secundum commentarium, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 21.1, Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Heiberg, G. L. (ed.), 1894, Simplicii in Aristotelis de caelo commentaria, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 7, Berlin: Reimer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heil, G. (ed.) 1967, ‘De Mortuis’, in Gregorii Nyssenii Sermones. Gregorii Nysseni Opera IX, Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Heine, R. (ed.), 1982, Origen, Homilies on Genesis and Exodus, Fathers of the Church, Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Henry, P. and Schwyzer, H.-R. (eds.), 1964–82, Plotini opera, Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Heylbut, G., (ed.), 1889, Aspasii in Ethica Nicomachea quae supersunt commentaria. Commentaria in Aristotelica Graeca 19.1, Berlin: Reimer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heylbut, G. (ed.), 1892, Eustratii et Michaelis et Anonyma in Ethica Nicomachea commentaria, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 20, Berlin: Reimer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, R. C. (trans.), 2007, Theodoret of Cyrus: The Questions on the Octateuch, Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Hoche, R. (ed.), 1866, Nicomachi Geraseni Pythagorei introductionis arithmeticae libri ii, Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Huby, P. and Steel, C. (trans.), 1997, Priscian: On Theophrastus on Sense-Perception and “Simplicius”: On Aristotle’s On the Soul 2.5–12, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jaeger, W. (ed.), 1952, ‘De virginitate’, in Gregorii Nyssenii Ascetica, Gregorii Nysseni Opera VIII, 1, Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, E. (trans.), 2014, Four Byzantine Novels, Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jungck, C. (ed.), 1974, Gregor von Nazianz: De Vita Sua. Einleitung, Text, Übersetzung, Kommentar, Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Kalbfleisch, K. (ed.), 1907, Simplicii In Aristotelis Categorias commentarium. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 8, Berlin: Reimer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldellis, A. and Polemis, I. (eds. and trans.), 2019, Saints of Ninth-and Tenth-Century Greece, Dumbarton Oaks Medieval Library, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kardong, T., 2010, Pillars of Community: Four Rules of Pre-Benedictine Monastic Life, Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press.Google Scholar
Koetschau, P. (ed.), 1899, Contra Celsum, Origenes Werke I, Leipzig: Buchandlung.Google Scholar
Koetschau, P. (ed.), 1913, De principiis, Origenes Werke V, Leipzig: Buchandlung.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konstan, D. (trans.), 2006, Aspasius: On Aristotle’s ‘Nicomachean Ethics 1–4, 7-8’, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kroll, W. (ed.), 1899–1901, Procli Diadochi in Platonis rem publicam commentarii, 2 vols., Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Laga, C. et al., (eds.), 1980, Maximi Confessoris quaestiones ad Thalassium I, Corpus Christianorum, Series Graeca 7, Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Lamb, W. R. M., 1955 (trans., 2nd ed.), Plato. Charmides. Alcibiades I and II. Hipparchus. The Lovers. Theages. Minos. Epinomis, Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lamberz, E. (ed.), 1975, Porphyrius. Sententiae ad intelligibiles ducentes, Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. and Parsons, P. (eds.), 1983, Supplementum Hellenisticum, Berlin-New York: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. and Sedley, D. (eds.), 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers, Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maas, P. and Trypanis, C. A. (eds.), 1970, Sancti romani melodi cantica: cantica dubia, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martini, E. andBassi, D. (1906), Catalogus codicum graecorum Bibliothecae Ambrosianae, Milan: Hoepli.Google Scholar
Masullo, R. (ed. and trans.), 1985, Vita di Proclo: testo critico, introduzione, traduzione e commentario, Naples: M. D’Auria Editore.Google Scholar
McGroarty, K., 2006, Plotinus on Eudaimonia: A Commentary on Ennead I.4, Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Merton, T. (ed.), 1960, The Wisdom of the Desert: Sayings from the Desert Fathers of the Fourth Century, New York: New Directions.Google Scholar
Migne, J. P. (ed.), 1860, Scala paradisi, Patrologia Graeca Cursus Completus, vol. 88, Paris: Imprimerie Catholique.Google Scholar
Migne, J. P. (ed.), 1863, De hominis opificio, Patrologia Graeca Cursus Completus, vol. 44, Paris: Imprimerie Catholique.Google Scholar
Migne, J. P. (ed.), 1865, Centuriae de caritate, Patrologia Graeca Cursus Completus, vol. 90, Paris: Imprimerie Catholique.Google Scholar
Migne, J. P. (ed.), 1865, Disputatio cum Pyrrho, Patrologia Graeca Cursus Completus, vol. 91, Paris: Imprimerie Catholique.Google Scholar
Migne, J. P. (ed.), 1865, Opusculum 1, Patrologia Graeca Cursus Completus, vol. 91, Paris: Imprimerie Catholique.Google Scholar
Moore, L. (trans.), 1991, The Ladder of Divine Ascent, Boston: Holy Transfiguration Monastery.Google Scholar
Morani, M. (ed.), 1987, Nemesii Emeseni De natura hominis, Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Moraux, P. (ed.), 1965, Aristote. Du ciel, Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Moreschini, C. (ed.), 1985, Gregoire Nazianze. Discours 32–37, Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar
Morrow, R. and Dillon, J. M. (trans.), 1987, Proclus’ Commentary on Plato’s Parmenides, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Musurillo, H. (ed.), 1964, De vita Moysis, Gregorii Nysseni Opera VIII, I, Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Norris, F. (ed.) andWickham, L and Williams, F. (trans.), 1991, Faith Gives Fullness to Reasoning: The Five Theological Orations of Gregory of Nazianzen, Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, E. (ed.), 1964, The Essential Plotinus, Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. J. (ed.), 2019, Plotin. Traité 19 Sur les vertus, Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Oikonomakos, K. (ed.), 2005, Βιβλίον ἐνδέκατον Τα Ἠθικὰ, ἤτοι τὰ Νικομάχεια, Corpus philosophorum Medii Aevi. Commentaria in Aristotelem Byzantina 3, Athens: Academy of Athens.Google Scholar
Otto, J. C. T. (ed.), 1880 3, Ps.-Justin, Confutatio dogmatum quorundam Aristotelicorum 1–2, Corpus apologetarum Christianorum saeculi secundi IV, Jena: Mauke.Google Scholar
Pappa, E. (ed.), 2002, Kommentar zu Metaphysik des Aristoteles (Buch 10), Corpus philosophorum Medii Aevi. Commentaria in Aristotelem Byzantina 2, Athens: Academy of Athens.Google Scholar
Patillon, M., Segonds, A-P and Brisson, L. (eds.), 2003, Porphyre: De l’abstinence, vol. 3 Collection des Universités de France, Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Peeters, F. H. (trans.), 1893, The Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle, London: Truebner and Co.Google Scholar
Pötscher, W. (ed.), 1969, Porphyrios: ΠΡΟΣ ΜΑΡΚΕΛΛΑΝ, Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rackham, H. (ed.), 1931, Cicero: De finibus, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rashed, M. (ed.), 2005, Aristote. De la géneration et la corruption. Nouvelle édition, Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Reinsch, D. R. and Kambylis, A. (eds.), 2001, Alexiad, Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. (ed.), 1950, Aristotle, Physica, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. (ed.), 1956, Aristotle, De anima, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Saffrey, H. D. and Segonds, A.-Ph (eds.), 2001, Proclus, ou, sur le bonheur, Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Saffrey, H. D. and Segonds, A.-Ph (eds.), 2013, Jamblique: Réponse à Porphyry (De Mysteriis), Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Salmond, S. (ed.), 1886, ‘Oration and Panegyric Addressed to Origen’, in Roberts, A., Donaldson, J. and Coxe, A. C. (eds.), Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 6, Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing.Google Scholar
Scheck, T. (ed.), 2002, Origen, Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans, Fathers of the Church, Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Schenkl, H. (ed.), 1916, Epicteti Dissertationes ab Arriano Digestae, Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Segonds, A. Ph. (ed.), 1985–6, Proclus. Sur le Premier Alcibiade de Platon, 2 vols., Collection des Universités de France, Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Ševčenko, I. (ed.) 2011. Chronographiae quae Theophanis Continuati nomine fertur Liber quo Vita Basilii Imperatoris amplectitur, Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (ed. and trans.), 1983, Alexander Aphrodisias on Fate, London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Sincewicz, R. (ed. and trans.), 2003, Evagrius of Pontus: The Greek Ascetic Corpus, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slings, S. R. (ed.), 2003 , Platonis Respublica. Oxford Classical Texts, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steel, C. et al. (eds.), 2007–9, Procli In Platonis Parmenidem Commentaria, 3 vols., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, D. and Talbot, A.-M. (trans.), 2005, The History of Leo the Deacon: Byzantine Military Expansion in the Tenth Century, Dumbarton Oaks Medieval Library, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sushemil, F. (ed.), 1887, Aristotelis Ethica Nicomachea, Lepizg: Teubner (Engl. transl. by Ross, D. [1998], Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Revised by J. L. Ackrill and J. O. Urmson, Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Tedennick, H. and Tarrant, H. (eds.), 1954, The Last Days of Socrates, New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
Thomson, J. A. K. (trans.), 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics. Revised Edition, New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Trompeter, J. and Wilberding, J. (trans.), 2019, Michael of Ephesus: On Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics 10, along with Themistius: On Virtue, translated by A. Rigolio, London; NY.: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Vaggione, R. P. (ed.), 1987, Eunomius: The Extant Works, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Deun, P. (ed.), 2000, Liber Asceticus, Corpus Christianorum, Series Graeca 40, Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Vassis, I. (ed.), 2002, Leon Magistros Choirosphaktes. Chiliostichos Theologia. Supplementa Byzantina 6, Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Veilleux, A. (ed.), 1980–2, Pachomian Koinonia, Cistercian Studies, 2 vols., Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications.Google Scholar
Vitelli, G. (ed.), 1897, Ioannis Philoponi in Aristotelis physicorum libros tres priores commentaria, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 16, Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Wallies, M. (ed.), 1905, Ioannis Philoponi In Aristotelis Analytica Priora commentaria, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 13.2, Berlin: Reimer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallies, M. (ed.), 1907, Eustratii in Analyticorum posteriorum librum secundum commentarium, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 21.1, Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Ward., B. (ed.), 2003, The Desert Fathers: Sayings of the Early Christian Monks, London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Westerink, L. G. (ed.), 1956, Olympiodorus: Commentary on the First Alcibiades of Plato, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Westerink, L. G. (ed.), 1962, Anonymous Prolegomena to Platonic Philosophy, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Westerink, L. G. (ed.), 1968, Arethae scripta minora vol. 1, Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Westerink, L. G. (ed.), 1970, Olympiodori In Platonis Gorgiam Commentaria, Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Westerink, L. G., 1976–7, The Greek Commentaries on Plato’s Phaedo, 2 vols., Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing.Google Scholar
Westerink, L. G. (ed.), 1990, Prolégomènes à la philosophie de Platon, Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Whittaker, J. (ed.), 1990, Alcinoos. Enseignement des doctrines de Platon, Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Xenophontos, S. (trans.), 2020, Theodore Metochites’ On Morals or Concerning Education: Introduction, Translation, and Notes, Dumbarton Oaks Medieval Library, 61, Cambridge, MA; London.Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Xenophontos, S. (ed.), forthcoming, George Pachymeres’ Commentary on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics: Introduction and Critical Edition (including Appendices of Diagrams and Supplementary Notes) by Sophia Xenophontos; English translation by S. Xenophontos and C. Addey, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca et Byzantina, Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Zimmern, A. (trans.), Porphyry’s Letter to His Wife Marcella, Grand Rapids, MI: Phanes Press.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Addey, C. 2014, Divination and Theurgy in Neoplatonism: Oracles of the Gods, Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Afonasin, E. V., Dillon, J. M. and Finamore, J. (eds.), 2012, Iamblichus and the Foundations of Late Platonism, Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algra, K., 2003, ‘Stoic Theology’, in Inwood, B. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 153–78.Google Scholar
Allen, P., 1997, The Concept of Woman: The Aristotelian Revolution, 750 B.C. – A.D. 1250, 2nd ed., Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Alpers, K., 1990, ‘Die „Definition des Seins“ des Eustratios von Nikaia. Kritische Neuausgabe’, in Harlfinger, D. (ed.), Festschrift für Martin Sicherl zum 75. Geburtstag. Von Textkritik zu Humanismusforschung, Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh, 141–59.Google Scholar
Arabatzis, G., 1998, Éthique du bonheur et orthodoxie à Byzance (IVe-XIIe siècles), Paris: Association Pierre Belon: Diffusion, De Boccard.Google Scholar
Arabatzis, G., 2009, ‘Michael of Ephesus on the Empirical Man, the Scientist and the Educated Man (In Ethica Nicomachea X and In de Partibus Animalium I)’, in Barber, Ch and Jenkins, D. (eds.), Medieval Greek Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics, Leiden-Boston: Brill, 163–84.Google Scholar
Aspegren, K., 1990, The Male Woman: A Feminine Ideal in the Early Church, Stockholm: Almquist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
Bailey, D. S., 1959, The Man-Woman Relation in Christian Thought, London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Baltussen, H., 2007, ‘From Polemic to Exegesis: The Ancient Philosophical Commentary’, Poetics Today 28.2: 247–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltussen, H., 2008, Philosophy and Exegesis in Simplicius. The Methodology of a Commentator, London, New Delhi, New York, Sydney: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Baltussen, H., 2014, ‘Aristotelian Commentary Tradition’, in Remes, P. and Slaveva- Griffin, S. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism, London, New York: Routledge, 106–14.Google Scholar
Baltussen, H., 2018, ‘Philosophical Commentary’, in McGill, S. and Watts, E. J. (eds.), A Companion to Late Antique Literature, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell, 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltzly, D., 2004, ‘The Virtues and “Becoming Like God”: Alcinous to Proclus’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 26: 297–321.Google Scholar
Baltzly, D., 2006, ‘Pathways to Purification: The Cathartic Virtues in the Neoplatonic Commentary Tradition’, in Baltzly, D. and Tarrant, H. (eds.), Reading Plato in Antiquity, London: Duckworth, 169–84.Google Scholar
Baltzly, D., 2013, ‘Proclus and Theodore of Asine on Female Philosopher-Rulers: Patriarchy, Metempsychosis, and Women in the Neoplatonic Commentary Tradition’, Ancient Philosophy 33: 403–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltzly, D. and Tarrant, H. (eds.), 2006, Reading Plato in Antiquity, London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Bammel, C. P., 1989, ‘Adam in Origen’, in Williams, R. D. (ed.), The Making of Orthodoxy: Essays in Honour of Henry Chadwick, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 62–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ch, Barber. and Jenkins, D. (eds.), 2009, Medieval Greek Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics, Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Barnes, J., 1992, ‘Metacommentary’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 10: 267–81.Google Scholar
Barnes, J., 1997, ‘Roman Aristotle’, in Barnes, J. and Griffin, M. (eds.), Philosophia Togata II, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1–69.Google Scholar
Bathrellos, D., 2004, The Byzantine Christ: Person, Nature, and Will in the Christology of Saint Maximus the Confessor, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beeley, C., 2008, Gregory of Nazianzus on the Trinity and the Knowledge of God: In Your Light We Shall See Light, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behr, J., 1999, ‘The Rational Animal: A Rereading of Gregory of Nyssa’s De hominis opificio,’, Journal of Early Christian Studies 7: 219–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behr, J., 2018, ‘From Adam to Christ: From Male and Female to Being Human’, The Wheel (online journal) 13/14, www.wheeljournal.com/the-wheel-issue-13-14 (accessed 16 May 2019).Google Scholar
Benakis, L., 2009, ‘Aristotelian Ethics in Byzantium’, in Barber, Ch and Jenkins, D. (eds.), Medieval Greek Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics, Leiden–Boston: Brill, 63–9.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, T. (ed.), 2012, Theoria, Praxis, and the Contemplative Life after Plato and Aristotle, Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beneker, J., 2011, ‘Plutarch and Saint Basil as Readers of Greek Literature’, Syllecta Classica 22: 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berardino, A. D., Oden, T. C. and Elowsky, J. C. (eds.), 2014, Encyclopedia of Ancient Christianity, 3 vols., Downers Grove, IL.: IVP Academic.Google Scholar
Bianchi, L., 2013, ‘Couper, distinguer, compléter: trois stratégies de lecture d’Aristote à la Faculté des Arts’, in Verger, J. and Weijers, O. (eds.), Les débuts de l’enseignement universitaire à Paris (1200–1245 environ), Turnhout: Brepols, 133–52.Google Scholar
Blanc, C., 1986, ‘L’attitude d’Origène a l’égard du corps et de la chair’, Studia Patristica 17: 843–58.Google Scholar
Blosser, B., 2012, Become Like the Angels: Origen’s Doctrine of the Soul, Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blowers, P., 2016, Maximos the Confessor: Jesus Christ and the Transfiguration of the World, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobzien, S., 1998, ‘The Inadvertent Conception and Late Birth of the Free Will Problem’, Phronesis 43: 133–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, H., 2013, Embodiment and Virtue in Gregory of Nyssa: An Anagogical Approach, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolman, E., 1998, ‘Mimesis, Metamorphosis and Representation in Coptic Monastic Cells’, The Bulletin of the American Society of Papyrologists 35.1/2: 65–77.Google Scholar
Bolman, E., 2007, ‘Depicting the Kingdom of Heaven: Paintings and Monastic Practice in Early Byzantine Egypt’, in Bagnall, R. S (ed.), Egypt in the Byzantine World, 300–700, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 408–33.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, D., 2009, ‘The Mind and the Heart in the Christian East and West’, Faith and Philosophy 26: 576–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, D., 2013, ‘St Maximus the Confessor on the Will’, inVasiljević, M. (ed.), Knowing the Purpose of Creation through the Resurrection: Proceedings of the Symposium on St Maximus the Confessor, Alhambra, CA: Sebastian Press, 143-57.Google Scholar
Bright, P., 2004, ‘Priesthood’, in McGuckin, J. (ed.), The Westminster Handbook to Origen, Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 179–81.Google Scholar
Brisson, L., 2006, ‘The Doctrine of the Degree of Virtues in the Neoplatonists: An Analysis of Porphyry’s Sentence 32, its Antecedents and its Heritage’, in Baltzly, D. and Tarrant, H. (eds.), Reading Plato in Antiquity, London: Duckworth, 89–106.Google Scholar
Brittain, C., 2003, ‘Attention Deficit in Plotinus and Augustine: Psychological Problems in Christian and Platonist Theories of the Grades of Virtue’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 18: 223–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadie, S., 1991, Ethics with Aristotle, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Browning, R., 1962, ‘An Unpublished Funeral Oration on Anna Comnena’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 188: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, R., 1975, ‘Homer in Byzantium’, Viator 6: 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunschwig, J., 2003, ‘Stoic Metaphysics’, in Inwood, B. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 206–32.Google Scholar
Budelmann, F., 2002, ‘Classical Commentary in Byzantium: John Tzetzes on Ancient Greek Literature’, in Gibson, R. K. and Kraus, C. S. (eds.), The Classical Commentary: Histories, Practices, Theory, Leiden: Brill, 141–69.Google Scholar
Bullough, V., 1976, Sexual Deviance in Society and History, New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Bydén, B., 2006, ‘Λογοτεχνικές καινοτομίες στα πρώιμα παλαιολόγεια υπομνήματα στο Περὶ ψυχῆς του Αριστοτέλη’, Υπόμνημα στη Φιλοσοφία 4: 221–51.Google Scholar
Bydén, B., 2013, ‘“No Prince of Perfection”: Byzantine Anti-Aristotelianism from the Patristic Period to Plethon’, in Angelov, D. and Saxby, M. (eds.), Power and Subversion in Byzantium: Papers from the 43rd Annual Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies, Farnham: Routledge, 147–76.Google Scholar
Cacouros, M., 2005, ‘Το αριστοτελικό υπόμνημα στο Βυζάντιο και οι μη ευρέως γνωστές πλευρές του: χαρακτηριστικά, τάσεις και προοπτικές’, Υπόμνημα 4: 155–90.Google Scholar
Cacouros, M., 2006, ‘La philosophie et les sciences du Trivium et du Quadrivium à Byzance de 1204 à 1453 entre tradition et innovation: les textes et l’enseignement, le cas de l’école du Prodrome (Pétra)’, in Cacouros, M. and Congourdeau, M.-H. (eds.), Philosophie et Sciences à Byzance de 1204 à 1453. Les textes, les doctrines et leur transmission, Leuven: Peeters, 1–51.Google Scholar
Cardman, F., 2008, ‘Early Christian Ethics’, in Harvey, S. A. and Hunter, D. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Early Christian Studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 932–56.Google Scholar
Caudano, A.-L., 2012, ‘Eustratios of Nicaea on Thunder and Lightning’, Byzantinische Zeitschrift 105.2: 611–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charalabopoulos, N. G., 2012, Platonic Drama and its Ancient Reception, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, D. and D. Scott, , 1999, ‘Aristotle on Well-Being and Intellectual Contemplation’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, vol. 73: 205–23 and 225–42, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R., 2018a, ‘The Basic Logic of Plotinus’ System: A Discussion of E.K. Emilsson, Plotinus’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 55: 227–50.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R., 2018b, ‘Porphyry’s Isagoge and Early Greek Neoplatonism’, Medioevo 43: 13–39.Google Scholar
Clark, E. A., 1986, Ascetic Piety and Women’s Faith: Essays on Late Ancient Christianity, Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Constantinidis, C. N., 1982, Higher Education in Byzantium in the Thirteenth and Early Fourteenth Centuries, 1204–ca. 1310, Nicosia: Cyprus Research Centre.Google Scholar
Cooper, A., 2005, The Body in St. Maximus the Confessor: Holy Flesh, Wholly Deified, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, A., 2013, ‘Saint Maximus on the Mystery of Marriage and the Body: A Reconsideration’, in Vasiljević, M (ed.), Knowing the Purpose of Creation through the Resurrection: Proceedings of the Symposium on St Maximus the Confessor Belgrade, October 18–21, 2012, Alhambra, CA: Sebastian Press, 195–221.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M., 1986, Reason and Human Good in Aristotle, Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Copleston, F., 1962, A History of Philosophy, vol. 1, New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Cornford, F., 1937, Plato’s Cosmology, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Costache, D., 2013, ‘Living Above Gender: Insights from Maximus the Confessor’, Journal of Early Christian Studies 21: 261–90;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costache, D., 2014, ‘Gender, Marriage, and Holiness in Amb. Io. 10 and 41’, in Mayer, W. and Elmer, I. J. (eds.), Men and Women in the Early Christian Centuries, Strathfield: St. Pauls Publications, 351–71.Google Scholar
Cribiore, R., 2001, Gymnastics of the Mind: Greek Education in Hellenistic and Roman Egypt, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouzel, H., 1956, Théologie de l’image de dieu chez Origène, Aubier: Éditions Montaigne.Google Scholar
Curzer, H., 1996, ‘A Defense of Aristotle’s Doctrine that Virtue Is a Mean’, Ancient Philosophy 16: 129–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curzer, H., 2012, Aristotle and the Virtues, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalarun, J., 1992, ‘The Clerical Gaze’, in Klapische-Zuber, C (ed.), A History of Women in the West, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, vol. 2, 15–42.Google Scholar
Daley, B. E., 2006, ‘“The Human Form Divine”: Christ’s Risen Body and Ours according to Gregory of Nyssa’, Studia Patristica 41: 301–18.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, C., 1992, ‘ΑΜΟΡΦΟΝ ΚΑΙ ΑΝΕΙΔΕΟΝ. Causalité des formes et causalité de l’Un chez Plotin’, Revue de philosophie ancienne 10: 71–113.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, C., 2005, ‘Les Sentences de Porphyre entre les Ennéades de Plotin et les Éléments de théologie de Proclus’, in Brisson, L. (ed.), Porphyre: Sentences, vol. 1, Paris: Vrin, 139–274.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, C., 2006, ‘À propos du De Anima de Jamblique’, Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 90: 617–40.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, C., 2009, ‘Modèles de causalité chez Plotin’, Les études philosophiques 90: 361–85.Google Scholar
De Haas, F. A. J., 2010, ‘Priscian of Lydia and Pseudo-Simplicius on the Soul’, in Gerson, L. P (ed.), The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, vol. 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 756–63.Google Scholar
Del Punta, F., 1998, ‘The Genre of Commentaries in the Middle Ages and its Relation to the Nature and Originality of Medieval Thought’, in Speer, A. and Aertsen, J. A. (eds.), Was ist Philosophie in Mittelalter?, Berlin: De Gruyter, 138–51.Google Scholar
Destrée, P., 2012, ‘Spectacles from Hades. On Plato’s Myths and Allegories in the Republic’, in Collobert, C., Destrée, P. and Gonzalez, Fr. J. (eds.), Plato and Myth. Studies on the Use and Status of Platonic Myths, Leiden and Boston: Brill, 109–24.Google Scholar
De Vita, M., 2011, Giuliano imperatore filosofo neoplatonico, Milan: Vita e Pensiero.Google Scholar
Dihle, A., 1982, The Theory of Will in Classical Antiquity, Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, J. M., 1983, ‘Plotinus, Philo and Origen on the Grades of Virtue’, in Blume, H.-D. and Mann, F. (eds.), Platonismus und Christentum: Festschrift für Heinrich Dörrie, Münster: Aschendorffsche Verlagsbuchhanlung, 92–105.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M., 1987, ‘Iamblichus of Chalcis (c. 240–325 AD)’, ANRW 36.2: 862–909.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M., 1996, ‘An Ethic for the Late Antique Sage’, in Gerson, L. P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 315–35.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M., 2005, Porphyre. Sentences. Traduction anglaise et notes, in Brisson, L. (ed.), Porphyre: Sentences, vol. 2, Paris: Vrin, 795–835.Google Scholar
Dmitriev, S., 2020, ‘Alexander the Great and Timoclea of Thebes: Greek Paideia under the Roman Empire’, Presented at the American Historical Association Annual Meeting, New York.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R., 1951, The Greeks and the Irrational, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dombrowski, D., 1984, ‘Vegetarianism and the Argument from Marginal Cases in Porphyry’, Journal of the History of Ideas 45: 141–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Douglass, S., 2005, Theology of the Gap: Cappadocian Language Theory and the Trinitarian Controversy, New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Duff, T. E., 2002, Plutarch’s Lives: Exploring Virtue and Vice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dunn, M., 2000, The Emergence of Monasticism: From the Desert Fathers to the Early Middle Ages, Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S., 2002, ‘Late-ancient Ancestors of Medieval Philosophical Commentaries’, in Fioravanti, G. et al. (eds.) Il commento filosofico nell’occidente latino, Turnhout: Brepols, 1–15.Google Scholar
Edwards, G. F., 2014, ‘Irrational Animals in Porphyry’s Logical Works: A Problem for the Consensus Interpretation of On Abstinence’, Phronesis 59: 22–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, G. F., 2016, ‘The Purpose of Porphyry’s Rational Animals: A Dialectical Attack on the Stoics in On Abstinence from Animal Food’, in Sorabji, R. (ed.), Aristotle Re-Interpreted: New Findings on Seven Hundred Years of the Ancient Commentators. London, New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 263–89.Google Scholar
Edwards, G. F., 2018, ‘Reincarnation, Rationality, and Temperance: Platonists on Not Eating Animals’, in Adamson, P. and Edwards, F. (eds.), Animals: A History, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 27–55.Google Scholar
Edwards, M., 2000, Neoplatonic Saints: The Lives of Plotinus and Proclus by Their Students, Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elm, S., 2012, Sons of Hellenism, Fathers of the Church Emperor Julian, Gregory of Nazianzus, and the Vision of Rome, Berkeley, Los Angeles, Oxford: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Emilsson, E. K., 2017, Plotinus, London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evrigenis, I., 1999, ‘The Doctrine of the Mean in Aristotle’s Ethical and Political Theory’, History of Political Thought 20.3: 393–416.Google Scholar
Festugière, A. J., 1969, ‘L’ordre de lecture des dialogues de Platon aux Ve/VIe siècles’, Museum Helveticum 26: 281–96.Google Scholar
Finamore, J. F., 2012, ‘Iamblichus on the Grades of Virtue’, in Afonasin, E. V., Dillon, J. M. and Finamore, J. (eds.), Iamblichus and the Foundations of Late Platonism, Leiden: Brill, 113–32.Google Scholar
Finamore, J. F., 2018, ‘Iamblichus on Soul’, in Marmodoro, A. and Cartwright, S. (eds.), A History of Mind and Body in Late Antiquity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, D. C., 2017, Women and Men in the Early Church: The Vision of St. John Chrysostom, 2nd ed., South Canaan, PA.: St. Tikhon’s Monastery Press.Google Scholar
Frankopan, P., 2009, ‘The Literary, Cultural and Political Context for the Twelfth-century Commentary on the Nicomachean ethics’, in Barber, C. and Jenkins, D. (eds.), Medieval Greek Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics, Leiden: Brill, 45–62.Google Scholar
Frede, D., 2003, ‘Stoic Determinism’, in Inwood, B. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 179–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frede, M., 2002, ‘John of Damascus on Human Action, the Will, and Human Freedom’, in Ierodiakonou, K. (ed.), Byzantine Philosophy and its Ancient Sources, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 63–96.Google Scholar
Frede, M., 2011, A Free Will: Origins of the Notion in Ancient Thought, Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, E., 1983, Sexual Desire and Love: Origins and History of the Christian Ethic of Sexuality and Marriage, Cambridge: James Clarke and Co.Google Scholar
Gaith, J., 1943, La conception de la liberté chez Grégoire de Nysse, Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Garland, L., 2007, ‘Imperial Women and Entertainment at the Middle Byzantine Court’, in Garland, L. (ed.), Byzantine Women, Varieties of Experience: 800–1200, Aldershot: Ashgate, 177–91.Google Scholar
Garland, L., 2017, ‘Mary ‘of Alania’, Anna Komnene, and the Revival of Aristotelianism in Byzantium’, Byzantinoslavica 75/1–2: 123–63.Google Scholar
Gerson, L. P., 2013, ‘Platonic Ethics in Later Antiquity’, in Crisp, R. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 129–46.Google Scholar
Gill, G., 1996, Personality in Greek Epic, Tragedy, and Philosophy: The Self in Dialogue, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gill, G., 2006, The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, C., 2013, ‘Cynicism and Stoicism’, in Crisp, R. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 93–111.Google Scholar
Giokarinis, K., 1964, ‘Eustratius of Nicaea’s Defense of the Doctrine of Ideas’, Franciscan Studies 12: 159–204.Google Scholar
Goldin, O., 2001, ‘Porphyry, Nature and Community’, History of Philosophy Quarterly 18: 353–71.Google Scholar
Golitsis, P., 2008a, Les Commentaires de Simplicius et de Jean Philopon à la Physique d’Aristote, Berlin-New York: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golitsis, P., 2008b, ‘Georges Pachymère comme didascale. Essai pour une reconstitution de son enseignement philosophique’, Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinistik 58: 53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golitsis, P., 2010, ‘Un livre reçu par le patriarche Athanase Ier et retourné à l’expéditeur’, Revue des études byzantines 68: 201–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golitsis, P., 2012, ‘A Byzantine Philosopher’s Devoutness Toward God: George Pachymeres’ Poetic Epilogue to his Commentary on Aristotle’s Physics’, in Bydén, B. and Ierodiakonou, K. (eds.), The Many Faces of Byzantine Philosophy, Athens: Norwegian Institute at Athens, 109–27.Google Scholar
Golitsis, P. 2018, “Michel d’Éphèse”, in Goulet, R. (ed.), Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques. VII. D’Ulpien à Zoticus, avec des compléments pour les tomes antérieurs, Paris: CNRS Éditions, 609–16.Google Scholar
Golitzen, A., 2013, Mystagogy: A Monastic Reading of Dionysius Areopagita, Collegeville: Cistercian Publications.Google Scholar
Gouillard, J., 1985, ‘Le procès officiel de Jean l’Italien. Les actes et leurs sous-entendues’, Travaux et Mémoires 9: 133–74.Google Scholar
Goulet-Cazé, M.-O., 1982, ‘Le programme d’enseignement dans les Écoles néolatonicienne’, in Brisson, L. et al. (eds.), Porphyre. La vie de Plotin, t.1, Paris: Vrin, 277–80.Google Scholar
Griffin, M., 2014, ‘Hypostasizing Socrates’, in Layne, D. A. and Tarrant, H. (eds.), The Neoplatonic Socrates, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 97–108.Google Scholar
Groarke, L., 2015, ‘Aristotle’s Contrary Psychology: The Mean in Ethics and Beyond’, The Review of Metaphysics 69.1: 47–71.Google Scholar
Grotowski, P., 2013, ‘Classicisation or Representation? Mimesis in Byzantine Pictorial Arts as a Derivative of Style’, Zograf 37: 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grünbart, M., 2010, ‘Zusammenstellen vs. Zusammenstehlen’, in Rhoby, A. and Schiffer, E. (eds.), Imitatio–Aemulatio–Variatio, Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 129–36.Google Scholar
Gschwandtner, C. M., 2017, ‘Mimesis or Metamorphosis? Eastern Orthodox Liturgical Practice and Its Philosophical Background’, Religions 8.5: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadot, I., 1987a, ‘Les introductions aux commentaires exégétiques chez les auteurs néoplatoniciens et les auteurs chrétiens’, in Tardieu, M. (ed.), Les règles de l’interprétation, Paris: Les Editions du Cerf, 99–122.Google Scholar
Hadot, I., 1987b, ‘La division neoplatonicienne des écrits d’Aristote’, in Wiesner, J. (ed.), Aristoteles Werk und Wirkung. Paul Moraux gewidmet, t.II, Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, 63–93.Google Scholar
Hadot, I., 1990, Simplicius. Commentaire sur les Catégories, fascicule 1, Leiden, New York, Copenhagen, Cologne: Brill.Google Scholar
Hadot, I., 1991, ‘The Role of the Commentaries on Aristotle in the Teaching of Philosophy According to the Prefaces of the Neoplatonic Commentaries on the Categories’, in Blumenthal, H. and Robinson, H. (eds.), Aristotle and the Later Tradition, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 175–89.Google Scholar
Hadot, I., 1992, ‘Aristote dans l’enseignement philosophique néoplatonicien. Les préfaces des commentaires sur les Categories’, Revue de Théologie et de Philosophie 124: 407–25.Google Scholar
Hadot, I., 1997, ‘Aspects de la théorie de la perception chez les néoplatoniciens: sensation, sensation commune, sensibles communs et conscience de soi’, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale VIII: 33–85.Google Scholar
Hadot, P., 1981, Exercices spirituels et philosophie antique, Paris: Études Augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Hadot, P., 1995, Philosophy as a Way of Life, London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haidt, J., 2006, The Happiness Hypothesis: Putting Ancient Wisdom and Philosophy to the Test of Modern Science, London: Random House.Google Scholar
Hardie, W. F. R., 1979, ‘Aristotle on the Best Life for Man’, Philosophy 54: 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmless, W., 2004, Desert Christians: An Introduction to the Literature of Early Monasticism, London: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, D., 2019, The Analogy of Love: St. Maximus the Confessor and the Foundations of Ethics, Yonkers, NY: SVS Press.Google Scholar
Harper, K., 2013, From Shame to Sin: The Christian Transformation of Sexual Morality in Late Antiquity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, V. E. F., 1990, ‘Male and Female in Cappadocian Theology’, Journal of Theological Studies 41: 441–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, V. E. F., 2006, ‘Gregory of Nyssa on Human Unity and Diversity’, Studia Patristica 41: 333–44.Google Scholar
Herrin, J., 2007, Byzantium: The Surprising Life of a Medieval Empire, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Herzberg, S., 2012, Menschliche und göttliche Kontemplation. Eine Untersuchung zum bios theoretikos bei Aristoteles, Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, P., 1998, ‘La fonction des prologues exégétiques dans la pensée pédagogique néoplatonicienne’, in Roussel, B. and Dubois, J.-D. (eds.), Entrer en matière, Paris: Cerf, 209–45.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, P., 2009, ‘What Was Commentary in Late Antiquity? The Example of the Neoplatonic Commentators’, in Gill, M. L. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), A Companion to Ancient Philosophy, West Sussex: Blackwell, 597–622.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K., 2004, ‘Byzantine Commentators on the Epistemic Status of Ethics’, in Adamson, P. et al. (eds.), Philosophy, Science and Exegesis in Greek, Arabic and Latin commentaries, vol. 1, London: Institute of Classical Studies, 221–38.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K., 2009, ‘Some Observations on Michael of Ephesus’ Comments on Nicomachean Ethics X’, in Barber, Ch and Jenkins, D. (eds.), Medieval Greek Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics, Leiden and Boston: Brill, 185–201.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K., 2012, ‘The Byzantine Commentator’s Task: Transmitting, Transforming or Transcending Aristotle’s Text’, in Speer, A. and Steinkrüger, P. (eds.), Knotenpunkt Byzanz. Wissensformen und kulturelle Wechselbeziehungen, Berlin: De Gruyter, 199–209.Google Scholar
Inwood, B., 1985, Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Inwood, B., 1986, ‘Goal and Target in Stoicism’, The Journal of Philosophy 83.10: 547–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, T., 2007, The Development of Ethics, vol. 1, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Janin, R., 1969 2, La géographie ecclésiastique de l’empire byzantin. Première partie: le siège de Constantinople et le patriarcat œcuménique. III tome, Les églises et les monastère, Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Jenkins, D., 2009, ‘Eustratios of Nicaea’s Defintion of Being Revisited’, in Barber, Ch and Jenkins, D. (eds.), Medieval Greek Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics, Leiden: Brill, 101–11.Google Scholar
Joannou, P., 1954, ‘Die Definition des Seins bei Eustratios von Nikaia. Die Universalienlehre in der byzantinischen Theologie im XI. Jh.’, Byzantinische Zeitschrift 47.2: 358–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, A., 2013, Religion and Identity in Porphyry of Tyre: The Limits of Hellenism in Late Antiquity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, C., 1988, ‘Discovering the Will: From Aristotle to Augustine’, in Dillon, J. M. and Long, A. A. (eds.), The Question of “Eclecticism”, Berkeley: University of California Press, 234–60.Google Scholar
Kaldellis, A., 2009, ‘Classical Scholarship in Twelfth-century Byzantium’, in Barber, Ch and Jenkins, D. (eds.), Medieval Greek Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics, Leiden and Boston: Brill, 1–43.Google Scholar
Kalligas, P., 2014, The Enneads of Plotinus. A Commentary, vol. 1, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Karamanolis, G., 2006a, Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle from Antiochus to Porphyry, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karamanolis, G., 2006b, ‘Η γένεση και οι φιλοσοφικές προϋποθέσεις του αρχαίου φιλοσοφικού υπομνήματος’, Υπόμνημα στη φιλοσοφία 4: 109–39.Google Scholar
Karamanolis, G., 2011, ‘The Place of Ethics in Aristotle’s Philosophy’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 40: 133–55.Google Scholar
Karamanolis, G., 2013, The Philosophy of Early Christianity, Durham: Acumen Press.Google Scholar
Karlin-Hayter, P, 1965, ‘Arethas, Choirosphactes and the Saracen Vizir’, Byzantion 35.2: 455–81.Google Scholar
Karras, V. A., 2006, ‘Sex/Gender in Gregory of Nyssa’s Eschatology: Irrelevant or Non-Existent?’, Studia Patristica 41: 363–8.Google Scholar
Keyt, D., 1983, ‘Intellectualism in Aristotle’, in Anton, J. P. and Preus, A. (eds.), Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, Albany: SUNY Press, 364–87.Google Scholar
Khoury, A. Th., 1972, Polémique byzantine contre l’Islam (VIIIe–XIIIe S.), Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Klein, J., ‘Stoic Eudaimonism and the Natural Law Tradition’, in Jacobs, J. A. (ed.), Reason Religion and Natural Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolbet, P. R., 2006, ‘Athanasius, the Psalms, and the Reformation of the Self’, Harvard Theological Review 99.1: 85–101.Google Scholar
Kopecek, T., 1979, A History of Neo-Arianism, vols. I–II, Cambridge, MA: The Philadelphia Patristic Foundation.Google Scholar
Kraut, R., 1989, Aristotle on the Human Good, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, D., 2010, ‘The Old Testament and Monasticism’, in Magdalino, P. and Nelson, R. S. (eds.), The Old Testament in Byzantium, Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks, 199–221.Google Scholar
Krueger, D., 2014, Liturgical Subjects: Christian Ritual, Biblical Narrative, and the Formation of the Self in Byzantium, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Kurtz, E., 1922, ‘[Monodies on Nikephoros Komnenos by Eustathios of Thessaloniki and Constantine Manasses]’, Vizantiĭskiĭ Vremennik 16: 283–322.Google Scholar
Kustas, G., 1973, Studies in Byzantine Rhetoric. Thessaloniki: Patriarchikon Idryma Paterikōn.Google Scholar
Lampakis, S., 2004, Γεώργιος Παχυμέρης, Πρωτέκδικος και δικαιοφύλαξ. Εισαγωγικό δοκίμιο, Athens: The National Hellenic Research Foundation.Google Scholar
Larsen, L., 2004a, ‘Disciples of Origen’, in McGuckin, J. (ed.), The Westminster Handbook to Origen, Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 89–91.Google Scholar
Larsen, L., 2004b, ‘Worship’, in McGuckin, J. (ed.), The Westminster Handbook to Origen, Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 216–18.Google Scholar
Lauro, E., 2004a, ‘The Fall’, in McGuckin, J. (ed.), The Westminster Handbook to Origen, Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 100–1.Google Scholar
Lauro, E., 2004b, ‘Preexistence’, in McGuckin, J. (ed.), The Westminster Handbook to Origen, Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 178–9.Google Scholar
Lawrence, G., 1993, ‘Aristotle and the Ideal Life’, Philosophical Review 102: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lear, G. M., 2004, Happy Lives and the Highest Good: An Essay on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemerle, P., 1977, Cinq études sur le XIe siècle byzantin, Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Lim, R., 1995, Public Disputation, Power, and Social Order in Late Antiquity, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Linguiti, A., 2012, ‘Plotinus and Porphyry on the Contemplative Life’, in Bénatouïl, T. (ed.), Theoria, Praxis, and the Contemplative Life after Plato and Aristotle, Leiden: Brill, 183–98.Google Scholar
Linguiti, A., 2013, ‘The Neoplatonic Doctrine of the Grades of Virtue’, in Pietsch, Ch (ed.), Ethik des antiken Platonismus. Der platonische Weg zum Glück in Systematik, Entstehung und historischem Kontext, Steiner: Stuttgart, 131–40.Google Scholar
Ljubarskij, J., 1994, ‘George the Monk as a Short-Story Writer’, Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinistik 44: 255–64.Google Scholar
Loudovikos, N., 1999, Ἡ κλειστὴ πνευματικότητα καὶ τὸ νόημα τοῦ ἑαυτοῦ: ὁ μυστικισμὸς τῆς ἱσχύος καὶ ἡ ἀλήθεια φύσεως καὶ προσώπου, Athens: Ἑλληνικὰ Γράμματα.Google Scholar
Loudovikos, N., 2019, Analogical Identities: The Creation of the Christian Self, Turnhout: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louth, A., 2017, ‘St. Maximos’ Distinction Between λόγος and τρόπος and the Ontology of the Person,’ in Mitralexis, S., Steiris, G., Podbielski, M. and Lalla, S. (eds), Maximus the Confessor as a European Philosopher, Eugene: Cascade, 157–65.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A, 1990, Three Rival Versions of Moral Inquiry: Encyclopedia, Genealogy, and Tradition, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Madden, J. D., 1982, ‘The Authenticity of Early Definitions of Will (thelēsis)’, in Heinzer, F. and Schönborn, C. (eds.), Maximus Confessor: Actes du Symposium sur Maxime le Confesseur, Fribourg (2–5 Septembre 1980), Fribourg: Éditions Universitaire Fribourg, 61–82.Google Scholar
Magdalino, P., 1997, ‘In Search of the Byzantine Courtier: Leo Choirosphaktes and Constantine Manasses’, in Maguire, H. (ed.), Byzantine Court Culture from 829 to 1204. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, 141–68.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J., 1992, Heresiography in Context: Hippolytus’ “Elenchos” as a Source for Greek Philosophy, Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfeld, J., 1994, Prolegomena: Questions to be Settled before the Study of an Author, or a Text, Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maraval, P., 2010, ‘Chronology of Works’, in Mateo-Seco, L. F. and Maspero, G. (eds.), The Brill Dictionary of Gregory of Nyssa, Leiden: Brill, 153–69.Google Scholar
Mariev, S., 2015, ‘Theoretical eudaimonia in Michael of Ephesus’, Quaestio 15: 185–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markopoulos, A., 2008, ‘Education’, in Jeffreys, E., Haldon, J. and Cormack, R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Byzantine Studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 785–95.Google Scholar
Martin, T. W., 2003, ‘The Covenant of Circumcision (Genesis 17: 9–14) and the Situational Antitheses in Galatians 3:28’, Journal of Biblical Literature 122: 111–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martzelos, G., 2005, Οὐσία καὶ ἐνέργειαι τοῦ Θεοῦ κατὰ τὸν Μέγαν Βασίλειον, 3rd ed., Thessaloniki: Πουρναρᾶ.Google Scholar
McCash, J. H. 1996, ‘The Cultural Patronage of Medieval Women: An Overview’, in McCash, J. H. (ed.), The Cultural Patronage of Medieval Women, Athens: The University of Georgia Press, 1–49.Google Scholar
McFarland, I., 2005, ‘“Naturally and by Grace”: Maximus the Confessor on the Operation of Will’, The Scottish Journal of Theology 58.4: 410–33.Google Scholar
McFarland, I., 2015, ‘The Theology of the Will’, in Allen, P. and Neil, B. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Maximus the Confessor, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 516–32.Google Scholar
McGuckin, J., 1994, ‘Perceiving Light from Light in Light (Oration 31.3): The Trinitarian Theology of Saint Gregory the Theologian’, Greek Orthodox Theological Review 39.1: 7–32.Google Scholar
McLynn, N., 2004, ‘Roman Empire’, in McGuckin, J. (ed.), The Westminster Handbook to Origen, Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 185–7.Google Scholar
Mercken, H. P. F., 1990, ‘The Greek Commentators on Aristotle’s Ethics’, in Sorabji, R. (ed.), Aristotle Transformed. The Ancient Commentators and Their Influence, London: Duckworth, 439–80.Google Scholar
Mercken, H. P. F., 2016, ‘The Greek Commentators on Aristotle’s Ethics’, in Sorabji, R. (ed.), Aristotle Transformed, 2nd ed., London: Bloomsbury,.Google Scholar
Meyendorff, J., 1984, Marriage: An Orthodox Perspective, 3rd ed., Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, S., 2008, Ancient Ethics: An Introduction, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Morani, M., 1981, La tradizione manoscritta del “De natura hominis” di Nemesio, Milan: Vita e Pensiero.Google Scholar
Moreschini, C., 1997, Filosofia e letteratura in Gregorio di Nazianzo, Milan: Vita e Pensiero.Google Scholar
Morphew, D. R., 2018, Passionate Platonism: Plutarch on the Positive Role of Non-Rational Affects in the Good Life, Unpublished Dissertation. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Most, G. W., 1989, ‘The Stranger’s Stratagem. Self-Disclosure and Self-Sufficiency in Greek Culture’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 109: 114–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullet, M., 1984, ‘Aristocracy and Patronage in the Literary Circles of Comnenian Constantinople,’, in Angold, M. (ed.), The Byzantine Aristocracy IX to XIII Centuries, Oxford: BAR, 173–201.Google Scholar
Nesseris, I. Ch., 2014, Education in Twelfth-Century Constantinople, Phd diss., Ioannina: University of Ioannina.Google Scholar
Neville, L., 2016a, ‘Why Did Byzantines Write History?, in Marjanović-Dušanić, S (ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress of Byzantine Studies, Belgrade: The Serbian National Committee of AIEB: 265–76.Google Scholar
Neville, L., 2016b, Anna Komnene: The Life and Work of a Medieval Historian, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neville, L., 2018a, ‘Pity and Lamentation in the Authorial Personae of Ioannis Kaminiates and Anna Komnene’, in Constantinou, S. and Meyer, M. (eds.), Gender and Emotions in Byzantine culture, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 65–92.Google Scholar
Neville, L., 2018b, Guide to Byzantine Historical Writing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newhauser, R. (ed.), 2005, In the Garden of Evil: The Vices and Culture in the Middle Ages, Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.Google Scholar
Newmyer, S., 2017, The Animal and the Human in Ancient and Modern Thought: The ‘Man Alone of Animals’ Concept, New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Noret, J., 1983, ‘Grégoire de Nazianze, l’auteur le plus cité, après la Bible, dans la littérature ecclésiastique byzantine’, in Mossay, J. (ed.), II. Symposium Nazianzenum: Louvain-la-Neuve, 25–28 août 1981, Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh, 259–66.Google Scholar
O’Leary, J., 2004, ‘Logos’, in McGuckin, J. (ed.), The Westminster Handbook to Origen, Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 142–5.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. J., 2003, Platonopolis: Platonic Political Philosophy in Late Antiquity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. 2008, ‘Spätantike und Byzanz: Neuplatonische Rezeption – Michael von Ephesos’, in Horn, Chr and Neschke-Hentschke, A. (eds.), Politischer Aristotelismus. Die Rezeption der Aristotelischen Politik von der Antike bis zum 19. Jahrhundert, Stuttgart: Metzler, 42–52.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D., 2014, ‘Michael Psellos’, in Gersh, S. (ed.), Interpreting Proclus from Antiquity to the Renaissance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 165–81.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. J., 2017, ‘Ethics in Plotinus and His Successors’, in Bobonich, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 240–61.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J., 2004, ‘Syrianus on Homonymy and Forms’, in Van Riel, G. and Macé, C. (eds.), Platonic Ideas in Ancient and Medieval Thought, Leuven: Leuven University Press, 31–50.Google Scholar
Osborne, C., 2009, Dumb Beasts & Dead Philosophers: Humanity and the Humane in Ancient Philosophy and Literature, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ousager, A., 2003, Plotinus on Selfhood, Freedom and Politics, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pakaluk, M., 2005, Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. An Introduction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadoyannakis, Y., 2006, ‘Instruction by Question and Answer: The Case of the Late Antique and Byzantine Erotapokriseis’, in Johnson, S. F. (ed.), Greek Literature in Late Antiquity: Dynamism, Didacticism, Classicism, Aldershot: Ashgate, 91–105.Google Scholar
Papaioannou, S., 2010, ‘Byzantine Mirrors: Self-Reflection in Medieval Greek Writing’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 64: 81–101.Google Scholar
Papaioannou, S., 2013. Michael Psellos: Rhetoric and authorship in Byzantium, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papaioannou, S.,2014, ‘Byzantine Historia’, in Raaflaub, K. (ed.), Thinking, Recording, and Writing History in the Ancient World, Malden: John Wiley & Sons, 297–313.Google Scholar
Papaioannou, S., 2017, ‘Rhetoric and Rhetorical Theory’, in Kaldellis, A. and Siniossoglou, N. (eds.), The Cambridge Intellectual History of Byzantium, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 101–12.Google Scholar
Parpulov, G., 2010, ‘Psalters and Personal Piety in Byzantium’, in Magdalino, P. and Nelson, R. S. (eds.), The Old Testament in Byzantium, Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks, 77–106.Google Scholar
Parpulov, G., 2014, Toward a History of Byzantine Psalters ca. 850–1350 AD, Plovdiv.Google Scholar
Pavlos, P., Janby, L., Emilsson, E. and Tollefsen, T. (eds.), 2019, Platonism in Christian Thought in Late Antiquity, Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelikan, J., 1993, Christianity and Classical Culture: The Metamorphosis of Natural Theology in the Christian Encounter with Hellenism, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R., 2002, Plutarch and History: Eighteen Studies, Swansea: Classical Press of Wales and Duckworth.Google Scholar
Petrey, T. G., 2016, Resurrecting Parts: Early Christians on Desire, Reproduction, and Sexual Difference, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pevarello, D., 2018, ‘Pythagorean Traditions in Early Christian Asceticism’, in Larsen, L. I. and Rubenson, S. (eds.), Monastic Education in Late Antiquity: The Transformation of Classical Paideia, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 256–77.Google Scholar
Praechter, K., 1909, ‘Die griechischen Aristoteleskommentare’, Byzantinische Zeitschrift 18: 516–38.Google Scholar
Quasten, J., 1992, Patrology, vol. 3, Westminster, MD: Christian Classics.Google Scholar
Ramelli, I., 2018a, ‘Origen’, in Marmodoro, A. and Cartwright, S. (eds.), A History of Body and Mind in Late Antiquity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 245–66.Google Scholar
Ramelli, I., 2018b, ‘Gregory of Nyssa’, in Marmodoro, A. and Cartwright, S. (eds.), A History of Body and Mind in Late Antiquity, 283–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasimus, T., Engberg-Pederson, T. and Dunderberg, I., 2010, Stoicism in Early Christianity, Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
Regan, T., 1983, The Case for Animal Rights, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Remes, P., 2006, ‘Plotinus’s Ethics of Disinterested Interest’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 44: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remes, P., 2007, Plotinus on Self: The Philosophy of the ‘We’, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remes, P. and Slaveva-Griffin, S. (eds.), 2014, The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rhoby, A. and Schiffer, E. (eds.), 2010, Imitatio, aemulatio, variatio, Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson Lear, G., 2004, Happy Lives and the Highest Good. An Essay on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rigo, A. and Trizio, M., (forthcoming), ‘Eustratios of Nicaea: a Hithertho Unknown ‘Master of Rhetors’ in Late Eleventh-Century’, in Giarenis, I. and Dendrinos, Ch (eds.), Bibliophilos: Books and Learning in the Byzantine World, Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. V., 1990, ‘The Tripartite Soul in the Timaeus’, Phronesis 35.1: 103–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, T. M., 1995, Plato’s Psychology, 2nd ed., Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Roche, T. D., 2014, ‘Happiness and the External Goods’, in Polansky, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 34–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, K. M., 1966, The Troublesome Helpmate: A History of Misogyny in Literature, Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Rosenfield, L. W., 1965, ‘The Doctrine of the Mean in Aristotle’s Rhetoric’, Theoria 31: 191–8.Google Scholar
Roukema, R., 2004, ‘Law of Nature’, in McGuckin, J. (ed.), The Westminster Handbook to Origen, Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press,140–1.Google Scholar
Rubenson, S., 1990, The Letters of St. Antony. Origenistic Theology, Monastic Tradition and the Making of a Saint, Lund: Bibliotheca Historico-Ecclesiastica Lundensis.Google Scholar
Ruether, R., 1974, ‘Misogynism and Virginal Feminism in the Fathers of the Church’, in Ruether, R. (ed.), Religion and Sexism: Images of Woman in the Jewish and Christian Traditions, New York: Simon and Schuster, 150–83.Google Scholar
Runia, D., 2004, ‘Philosophy’, in McGuckin, J. (ed.), The Westminster Handbook to Origen, Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 171–5.Google Scholar
Schniewind, A., 2005, ‘The Social Concern of the Plotinian Sage’, in Smith, A. (ed.), The Philosopher and Society in Late Antiquity, Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales, 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schramm, M., 2013, Freundschaft im Neuplatonismus: politisches Denken und Sozialphilosophie von Plotin bis Kaiser Julian, Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D., 1999, ‘The Stoic-Platonist Debate on kathêkonta’, in Ierodiakonou, K. (ed.), Topics in Stoic Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 128–52.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W., 2008, ‘Introduction’, in Sharples, R. W. and van der Eijk, P. J. (eds. and trans.), Nemesius: On the Nature of Man, Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, G., 1995, Theurgy and the Soul: The Neoplatonism of Iamblichus, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Sheppard, A., 2014, The Poetics of Phantasia: Imagination in Ancient Aesthetics, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Sheppard, A., 2021, ‘‘In Plato We Can See the Bad Characters Being Changed by the Good and Instructed and Purified’. Attitudes to Platonic Dialogue in Later Neoplatonism,’ in Erler, M., Hessler, J. E. and Petrucci, F. (eds.), Authority in the Platonist Tradition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 277–44.Google Scholar
Shuttleworth Kraus, C., 2002, ‘Introduction: Reading Commentaries/Commentaries as Reading’, in Gibson, R. K. and Shuttleworth Kraus, C. (eds.), The Classical Commentary: Histories, Practices, Theory, Leiden, Boston, Cologne: Brill, 1–27.Google Scholar
Simmons, M. B, 2009, ‘Porphyrian Universalism: A Tripartite Soteriology and Eusebius’s Response’, Harvard Theological Review 102.2: 169–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siniossoglou, N., 2011, Radical Platonism in Byzantium: Illumination and Utopia in Gemistos Plethon, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinkewicz, R., 2003, ‘Introduction’, in Sinkewicz, R. (ed. and trans.), Evagrius of Pontus: The Greek Ascetic Corpus, Oxford: Oxford University Press, xvii–xl.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirkel, R., 2016, ‘Philoponus on the Priority of Substances’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 54: 351–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sissa, G., 1992, ‘The Sexual Philosophies of Plato and Aristotle’, in Pantel, P. (ed.), A History of Women in the West, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, vol. 1, 46–82.Google Scholar
Sisson, J., 1995, ‘Aristotle, Virtue, and the Mean: Introduction’, Apeiron, 28.4: vii–xxi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slingerland, E., 2014, Trying Not to Try. The Art of Effortlessness and the Power of Spontaneity, Edinburgh: Canongate BooksGoogle Scholar
Sluiter, I., 1999, ‘Commentaries and the Didactic Tradition’, in Most, G. (ed.), Commentaries = Kommentare, Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 173–205.Google Scholar
Smith, A., 1999, ‘The Significance of Practical Ethics for Plotinus’, in Cleary, J. J. (ed.), Traditions of Platonism: Essays in Honour of John Dillon, Aldershot: Ashgate, 227–36.Google Scholar
Smith, A., 2005, ‘Action and Contemplation in Plotinus’, in Smith, A. (ed.), The Philosopher and Society in Late Antiquity, Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales, 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. (ed.), 2005, The Philosopher and Society in Late Antiquity, Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Smith, J. W., 2006, ‘The Body of Paradise and the Body of the Resurrection: Gender and the Angelic Life in Gregory of Nyssa’s De hominis opificio’, Harvard Theological Review 99: 207–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorabji, R. (ed.), 1990, Aristotle Transformed. The Ancient Commentators and Their Influence, London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R., 1995, Animal Minds and Human Morals: The Origins of the Western Debate, Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorabji, R., 2000, Emotion and Peace of Mind: From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation, Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R., 2003, Emotion and Peace of Mind: From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (ed.), 2005, The Philosophy of the Commentators. A Sourcebook, vol. 3. Ithaca, NY: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R., 2013, ‘The Concept of Will from Plato to Maximus the Confessor’, in Sorabji, R., Perception, Conscience and Will in Ancient Philosophy, Farnham: Ashgate Variorium, 6–28.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R., 2016, ‘The Ancient Commentators on Aristotle’, in Sorabji, R. (ed.), Aristotle Transformed, 2nd ed., London: Bloomsbury, 1–34.Google Scholar
Stang, C., 2013, ‘Negative Theology from Gregory of Nyssa to Dionysius the Areopagite’, in Lamm, J. (ed.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Christian Mysticism, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 161–76.Google Scholar
Steel, C., 1978, The Changing Self. A Study on the Soul in Later Neoplatonism: Iamblichus, Damascius and Priscianus, Brussels: Paleis der Academien.Google Scholar
Steel, C., 2002, ‘Neoplatonic Sources in the Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics by Eustratius and Michael of Ephesus’, Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 44: 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern-Gillet, S., 2014, ‘Plotinus on Metaphysics and Morality’, in Remes, P. and Slaveva-Griffin, S. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism, London and New York: Routledge, 396–420.Google Scholar
Streck, M., 2005, Das schönste Gut: der menschliche Wille nach Nemesius von Emesa und Gregor von Nyssa, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talamanca, M., 1977, ‘Lo schema “genus-species” nelle sistematiche dei giuristi romani’, in La filosofia greca e il diritto romano (Atti Roma 1973), vol. II, Rome: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, 3–319.Google Scholar
Tannery, P., 1888, ‘Rapport sur une mission en Italie’, Archives des missions scientifiques et littéraires 13: 405–55.Google Scholar
Taormina, D. P., 2010, ‘Filosofia in lettere’, in Taormina, D. P. and Piccione, R. M. (eds.), Giamblico. I frammenti delle Epistole, Naples: Bibliopolis, 87–271.Google Scholar
Taormina, D. P., 2012, ‘Iamblichus: The Two-Fold Nature of the Soul and the Causes of Human Agency’, in Afonasin, E., Dillon, J. and Finamore, J. F. (eds.), Iamblichus: the Two-Fold Nature of the Soul and the Causes of Human Agency, Leiden and Boston: Brill, 63–73.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H., 2014, ‘Platonist Curricula and Their Influence’, in Remes, P. and Slaveva-Griffin, S. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism, London: Routledge, 16–29.Google Scholar
Tavard, G. H., 1973, Woman in Christian Tradition, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C., 1989, Sources of the Self, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Telelis, I., 2017, ‘Τεχνικὸς διδάσκαλος: Georgios Pachymeres as Paraphrast of Aristotelian Meteorology’, in Cuomo, A. and Trapp, E. (eds.), Toward a Historical Sociolinguistic Poetics of Medieval Greek (BYZANTIOS. Studies in Byzantine History and Civilization 12), Turnhout: Brepols, 119–42.Google Scholar
Thompson, F., 2004, ‘Cosmology’, in McGuckin, J. (ed.), The Westminster Handbook to Origen, Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 83–5.Google Scholar
Thorsteinsson, R. M., 2010, Roman Christianity and Roman Stoicism: A Comparative Study of Ancient Morality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thunberg, L., 1995, Microcosm and Mediator: The Theological Anthropology of Maximus the Confessor, Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Tobin, T. H., 1983, The Creation of Man: Philo and the History of Interpretation, Washington, DC: Catholic Biblical Association of America.Google Scholar
Torrance, A. and Zachuber, J. (eds.), 2016, Individuality in Late Antiquity, Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trizio, M., 2009, ‘Neoplatonic Source-Material in Eustratios of Nicaea’s commentary on Book VI of the Nicomachean Ethics’, in Barber, Ch and Jenkins, D. (eds.), Medieval Greek Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics, Leiden and Boston: Brill, 71–109.Google Scholar
Trizio, M., 2012, ‘A Neoplatonic Refutation of Islam from the Time of the Komnenoi’, in Speer, A. (ed.), Knotenpunkt Byzanz: Wissensformen und kulturelle Wechselbeziehungen, Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, 91–107.Google Scholar
Trizio, M., 2013, ‘Eliodoro di Prusa e i commentatori greco-bizantini di Aristotele’, in Rigo, A., Babuin, A. and Trizio, M. (eds.), Vie per Bisanzio: Atti del VIII Congresso Nazionale dell’Associazione Italiana di Studi Bizantini. Venezia, 25–28 novembre 2009, Bari: Edizioni di pagina, 803–30.Google Scholar
Trizio, M., 2014, ‘Eleventh- to Twelfth-Century Byzantium’, in Gersh, S. (ed.), Interpreting Proclus. From Antiquity to the Renaissance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 182–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trizio, M., 2016. Il neoplatonismo di Eustrazio di Nicea. Bari: Edizioni di Pagina.Google Scholar
Trizio, M., 2017, ‘Reading and commenting on Aristotle’, Kaldellis, A. and Siniossoglou, N. (eds.), The Cambridge Intellectual History of Byzantium, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 397–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tronzo, W., 1994, ‘Mimesis in Byzantium: Notes Toward a History of the Function of the Image’, RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics 25: 61–76.Google Scholar
Tsouna, V., 2013, ‘Mimêsis and the Platonic Dialogue’, Rhizomata 1: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuominen, M., 2009, The Ancient Commentators on Plato and Aristotle, Berkeley and Los Angeles, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tuominen, M., forthcoming, ‘On Justice in Porphyry’s On Abstinence’, in Adamson, P. and Rapp, C. (eds.), State and Nature: Essays in Ancient Political Philosophy, Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tuominen, M., manuscript, Injuring No-One, Living with Justice: Porphyry’s Ethics of On Abstinence.Google Scholar
Tye, M., 2017. Tense Bees and Shell-Shocked Crabs: Are Animals Conscious?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tzamalikos, P., 2007, Origen: Philosophy of History and Eschatology, Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaggione, R. P., 1993, ‘Of Monks and Lounge Lizards: ‘Arians’, Polemics and Asceticism in the Roman East’, in Barnes, M. and Williams, D. (eds.), Arianism after Arius: Essays on the Development of the Fourth Century Trinitarian Conflicts, Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 181–214.Google Scholar
Vaggione, R. P., 2000, Eunomius of Cyzicus and the Nicene Revolution, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Valente, S., 2018, ‘The Construction of a Philosophical Textbook: Some Remarks on Nikephoros Blemmydes’ Epitome physica’, AION Sezione di Filologia e Letteratura Classica 40: 138–55.Google Scholar
Van den Berg, R. M., 2013, ‘Plotinus’s Socratic Intellectualism’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, 28: 217–31.Google Scholar
Van den Berg, R. M., 2014, ‘Proclus on Hesiod’s Works and Days and ‘Didactic’ Poetry’, Classical Quarterly 64: 383–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Berg, R. M., 2017, ‘Proclus and Damascius on Φιλοτιμία: The Neoplatonic Psychology of a Political Emotion’, Philosophie Antique 17: 149–65.Google Scholar
Van Hoof, L., 2010, Plutarch’s Practical Ethics: The Social Dynamics of Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vikan, G., 1990, ‘Pilgrims in Magi’s Clothing: The Impact of Mimesis on Early Byzantine Pilgrimage Art’, in Ousterhout, R. (ed.), The Blessings of Pilgrimage, Illinois Byzantine Studies, Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 97–107.Google Scholar
Von Staden, H., 2002, ‘“A Woman Does Not Become Ambidextrous”: Galen and the Culture of Scientific Commentary’, in Gibson, R. K. and Kraus, C. (eds.), The Classical Commentary: Histories, Practices, Theory, Leiden: Brill, 109–39.Google Scholar
Webb, R., 2001, ‘The Progymnasmata as Practice’, in Lee Too, Y. (ed.), Education in Greek and Roman Antiquity, Leiden: Brill, 289–316.Google Scholar
Weijers, O., 2002, La ‘disputatio’ dans les facultés des arts au Moyen Âge, Turnhout: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westerink, L. G., 1990 2, ‘The Alexandrian Commentators and the Introductions to their Commentaries’, in Sorabji, R. (ed.), Aristotle Transformed. The Ancient Commentators and Their Influence, Ithaca, NY: Duckworth, 325–48.Google Scholar
Wickham, L. R., 1968, ‘The “Syntagmation” of Aetius the Anomean’, Journal of Theological Studies 19.2: 532–69.Google Scholar
Wildberg, C., 2002, ‘Neuplatonische Ethik zwischen Religion und Metaphysik’, in Kobusch, Th, Erler, M. andMännlein-Robert, I. (eds.) Metaphysik und Religion, Munich and Leipzig:K. G. Saur, 261–78.Google Scholar
Wilberding, J., 2008, ‘Automatic Action in Plotinus’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 34: 373–407.Google Scholar
Williams, B., 1981, Moral Luck, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xenophontos, S., 2016, Ethical Education in Plutarch: Moralising Agents and Contexts, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zografidis, G., 2011a, ‘Byzantine Ethics’, in Lagerlund, H. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy: Philosophy Between 500 and 1500, Dordrecht: Springer, 323–8.Google Scholar
Zografidis, G., 2011b, ‘George Pachymeres’, in Lagerlund, H. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Philosophy Between 500 and 1500, I, Dordrecht: Springer, 394–7.Google Scholar
Zorzi, N., 2015, ‘Per la tradizione manoscritta dell’inedito commento all’Etica nicomachea di Giorgio Pachimere: I. Il Marc. gr. 212 di Bessarione e i suoi apografi. II. Ermolao Barbaro e il commento di Pachimere (con una proekdosis del cap. 18)’, Νέα Ῥώμη. Rivista di ricerche bizantinistiche 12: 245–304, tables 1–8.Google Scholar