Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-vq995 Total loading time: 0.279 Render date: 2021-10-22T11:20:22.101Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

1 - Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

Richard M. Walker
Affiliation:
The University of Hong Kong
George A. Boyne
Affiliation:
Cardiff University
Gene A. Brewer
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Richard M. Walker
Affiliation:
The University of Hong Kong
George A. Boyne
Affiliation:
Cardiff University
Gene A. Brewer
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The performance of public services is one of the central policy issues across the globe. Response to the global financial crisis during the late 2000s was typically led by government – in the UK and USA governments stepped into the banking system and either shored up these institutions or nationalized them, whereas in China the Communist Party sought to spend its way out of recession. The emergence of SARS in the early 2000s and the subsequent swine flu epidemic were public health crises managed and coordinated by public organizations: some of these were international agencies, such as the World Health Organization, but the majority of the heavy lifting was done at the coal face by public organizations and health agencies. The majority of crises, whether they are perpetrated by people (e.g. terrorist attacks, mass genocide or nuclear accidents) or result from natural catastrophes (e.g. earthquakes, tsunamis or famine), require public action. These global and high-impact examples are the tip of the iceberg – public services touch the majority of people in advanced and developing economies on a daily basis: children require schooling, the elderly need personal care and assistance, rubbish needs collecting to prevent public health incidents and the public needs to be confident that the water they drink is potable and the food they eat is safe. Moreover, government must protect its people from internal and external threats such as civil war and foreign invasion. In short, public services shore up our world and therefore knowledge about strategies to improve their performance is central to the good of society.

Type
Chapter
Information
Public Management and Performance
Research Directions
, pp. 1 - 33
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, Lotte Bøgh, and Blegvad, Marianne. 2006. ‘Does ownership matter for the delivery of professionalized public services? Cost-efficiency and effectiveness in private and public dental care for children in Denmark’, Public Administration, 84, 1, 147–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Rhys, and Boyne, George A.. 2008. ‘Organizational environments and public-­service failure: an empirical analysis’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26, 4, 788–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Rhys, Boyne, George A., Law, Jennifer, and Walker, Richard M.. 2005. ‘External constraints on local service standards: the case of comprehensive performance assessment in English local government’, Public Administration, 83, 3, 639–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Rhys, Boyne, George A., Law, Jennifer, and Walker, Richard M.. 2008. ‘Organizational strategy, external regulation and public service performance’, Public Administration, 86, 1, 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Rhys, Boyne, George A., Law, Jennifer, and Walker, Richard M.. 2009. ‘Centralization, organizational strategy and public service performance’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 1, 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Rhys, Boyne, George A., Jae Moon, M., and Walker, Richard M.. 2010. ‘Assessing organizational performance: explaining differences between internal and external measures’, to appear in International Public Management Journal.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Rhys, Boyne, George A., and Walker, Richard M.. 2006. ‘Strategy content and organizational performance: an empirical analysis’, Public Administration Review, 66, 1, 52–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Rhys, Boyne, George A., and Walker, Richard M.. 2006. ‘Subjective and objective measures of organizational performance: an empirical exploration’, in Boyne, George A., Meier, Kenneth J., O’Toole, Laurence J., Jr., and Walker, Richard M. (eds.) Public Services Performance: Perspectives on Measurement and Management. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Audit Commission. 2002. Comprehensive Performance Assessment. London: Audit Commission.Google Scholar
Avellaneda, Claudia N. 2008. ‘Municipal performance: does mayoral quality matter?’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 2, 285–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohte, John, and Meier, Kenneth J.. 2000. ‘Goal displacement: assessing the motivation for organizational cheating’, Public Administration Review, 60, 1, 173–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bommer, William. H., Johnson, Jonathan L., Rich, Gregory A., Podsakoff, Philip M., and MacKenzie, Scott B.. 1995. ‘On the interchangeability of objective and subjective measures of employee performance: a meta-analysis’, Personnel Psychology, 48, 3, 587–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyne, George A. 2002. ‘Concepts and indicators of local authority performance: an evaluation of the statutory framework in England and Wales’, Public Money and Management, 22, 2, 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyne, George A. 2003. ‘Sources of public service improvement: a critical review and research agenda’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13, 3, 367–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyne, George A., and Walker, Richard M.. 2005. ‘Determinants of performance in public organizations symposium’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 4, 483–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyne, George A., Farrell, Catherine, Law, Jennifer, Powell, Martin, and Walker, Richard M.. 2003. Evaluating Public Management Reform. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Boyne, George A., and Meier, Kenneth J.. 2009. ‘Environmental turbulence, organizational stability, and public service performance’, Administration & Society, 40, 8, 799–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyne, George. A., Meier, Kenneth. J., O’Toole, Laurence J., Jr., and Walker, Richard M. (eds.). 2006. Public Services Performance: Perspectives on Measurement and Management. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Brewer, Gene A. 2008. ‘Employee and organizational performance’, in Perry, James L. and Hondeghem, Annie (eds.) Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service. Oxford University Press, pp. 136–56.Google Scholar
Brewer, Gene A., and Selden, Sally Coleman. 2000. ‘Why elephants gallop: assessing and predicting organizational performance in federal agencies’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 4, 685–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Gene A., and Walker, Richard M.. 2009. ‘The impact of red tape on governmental performance: an empirical analysis’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, published online: doi:10.1093/jopart/mun040, February.Google Scholar
Carmeli, Abraham. 2006. ‘The managerial skills of the top management team and the performance of municipal organisations’, Local Government Studies, 32, 2, 153–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chun, Young Han, and Rainey, Hal G.. 2005. ‘Goal ambiguity and organizational performance in US federal agencies’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 4, 529–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckardt, Sebastian. 2008. ‘Political accountability, fiscal conditions and local government performance – Cross-sectional evidence from Indonesia’, Public Administration and Development, 28, 1, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, Sergio. 2005. ‘Developing and testing an integrative framework of public sector leadership: evidence from the public education arena’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 2, 197–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
François, Patrick. 2000. ‘Public service motivation as an argument for government provision’, Journal of Public Economics, 78, 3, 275–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goerdel, Holly T. 2005. ‘Taking initiative: proactive management and organizational performance in networked environments’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 3, 599–611.Google Scholar
Golden, Brian R. 1992. ‘Is the past the past – or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategies’, Academy of Management Journal, 35, 5, 848–60.Google ScholarPubMed
Government Executive. 2004. Daily briefing, January 29th, 2004. Retrieved 19 May 2004 from .
Heinrich, Carolyn J., and Choi, Youseok. 2007. ‘Performance-based contracting in social welfare programs’, The American Review of Public Administration, 37, 4, 409–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinrich, Carolyn J., and Lynn, Laurence E., Jr. (eds.). 2000. Governance and Performance: New Perspectives. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Heinrich, Carolyn J., and Lynn, Laurence E., 2001. ‘Means and ends: a comparative study of empirical methods for investigating governance and performance’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11, 1, 109–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicklin, Alisa, O’Toole, Laurence J., Jr., and Meier, Kenneth J.. 2008. ‘Serpents in the sand: managerial networking and nonlinear influences on organizational performance’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 2, 253–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Peter. 1982. The Political Economy of Bureaucracy. Oxford: Phillip Allen.Google Scholar
Ingraham, Patricia W., Joyce, Phillip G., and Donahue, Amy Kneedler. 2003. Government Performance: Why Management Matters. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
de Lancer Julnes, Patria and Holzer, Marc. 2001. ‘Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: an empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation’, Public Administration Review, 61, 6, 693–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukemeyer, Anna, and McCorkle, Richard C.. 2006. ‘Privatization of prisons: impact on prison conditions’, American Review of Public Administration, 36, 2, 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynn, Laurence E., Jr., Heinrich, Carolyn J., and Hill, Carolyn J.. 2001. Improving Governance: a New Logic for Empirical Research. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Stephen, and Smith, Peter. 2005. ‘Multiple public service performance indicators: towards an integrated statistical approach’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 3, 599–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J., and O’Toole, Laurence J., Jr. 2002. ‘Public management and organizational performance: the effect of managerial quality’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21, 4, 629–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J., and O’Toole, Laurence J., 2003. ‘Plus ça change: public management, personal stability, and organizational performance’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13,1, 43–64.Google Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J., and O’Toole, Laurence J., 2009. ‘The dog that didn’t bark: how public managers handle environmental shocks’, Public Administration, 87, 3, 485–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J., O’Toole, Laurence J., Jr, ., Boyne, George A., and Walker, Richard M.. 2007. ‘Strategic management and the performance of public organizations: testing venerable ideas against recent theories’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 3, 357–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J., O’Toole, Laurence J., Jr., and Crotty, Sean Nicholson–. 2004. ‘Multilevel governance and organizational performance: investigating the political bureaucratic labyrinth’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23, 1, 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, Raymond E., and Snow, Charles C.. 1978. Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Ronald K., Agle, Bradley R., and Wood, Donna J.. 1997. ‘Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts’, Academy of Management Review, 22, 4, 853–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moynihan, Donald P., and Pandey, Sanjay K.. 2005. ‘Testing how management matters in an era of government by performance management’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 3, 421–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. 2000. Best Value Performance Indicators for 2000/2001. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2005. Modernising Government: The Way Forward. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
O’Toole, Laurence J., Jr., and Meier, Kenneth J.. 1999. ‘Modelling the impact of public management: the implications of structural context’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9, 3, 505–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Toole, Laurence J., 2004. ‘Parkinson’s Law and the new public management? Contracting determinants and service-quality consequences in public education’, Public Administration Review, 64, 3, 342–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandey, Sanjay K., and Moynihan, Donald P.. 2006. ‘Bureaucratic red tape and organizational performance: testing the moderating role of culture and political support’, in Boyne, George A., Meier, Kenneth J., O’Toole, Laurence J., Jr. and Walker, Richard M. (eds.) Public Service Performance: Perspectives on Measurement and Management. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pitts, David W. 2007. ‘Representative bureaucracy, ethnicity, and public schools: examining the link between representation and performance’, Administration & Society, 39, 4, 497–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rainey, Hal G., and Steinbauer, Paula. 1999. ‘Galloping elephants: developing elements of a theory of effective government organizations’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9, 1, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Ryzin, Gregg G. 2005. ‘Testing the expectancy disconfirmation model of citizen satisfaction with local government’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 4, 599–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Peter. 2006. ‘Quantitative approaches towards assessing organizational performance’, in Boyne, George. A., Meier, Kenneth. J., O’Toole, Laurence J., Jr. and Walker, Richard M. (eds.) Public Services Performance: Perspectives on Measurement and Management. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Symon, Peter, and Walker, Richard M.. 1995. ‘A consumer perspective of performance indictors: the Report to Tenants Regime in England and Wales’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 13, 2, 195–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 2004. Governance Indicators: A User’s Guide. Oslo: UNDP.Google Scholar
Walker, Richard M., and Boyne, George A.. 2009. ‘Determinants of performance in public organizations symposium II’, Public Administration, 87, 3, 433–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Richard M., and Brewer, Gene A.. 2009. ‘Can management strategy minimize the impact of red tape on organizational performance?’, Administration & Society, 41, 4, 423–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, Toby B., Michie, Jonathan, Patterson, Malcolm, Wood, Stephen J., Sheehan, Maura, Clegg, Chris W., and West, Michael. 2004. ‘On the validity of subjective measures of company performance’, Personnel Psychology, 57, 1, 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witte, John, Weimer, David, Shober, Arnold, and Schlomer, Paul. 2007. ‘The performance of Charter Schools in Wisconsin’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26, 3, 557–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, Kiyoshi. 2006. ‘Performance of semi-autonomous public bodies: linkage between autonomy and performance in Japanese agencies’, Public Administration and Development, 26, 1, 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Kaifeng, Hsieh, Jun Yi, and Li, Tzung Shiun. 2009. ‘Contracting capacity and perceived contracting performance: nonlinear effects and the role of time’, Public Administration Review, 69, 4, 681–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7
Cited by

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×