Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T16:18:36.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false


Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2009

Huw Beverley-Smith
Field Fisher Waterhouse, London
Ansgar Ohly
Universität Bayreuth, Germany
Agnes Lucas-Schloetter
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munchen
Get access
Privacy, Property and Personality
Civil Law Perspectives on Commercial Appropriation
, pp. 227 - 238
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Acquarone, D., ‘L'ambiguïté du droit à l'image’, D. 1985, Chronique, 129 s.
Adams, J., Character Merchandising (2nd edn) (London: Butterworths, 1996).Google Scholar
Ahrens, C., Die Verwertung persönlichkeitsrechtlicher Positionen (Würzburg: Ergon-Verlag, 2002).Google Scholar
Amelung, K., ‘Die zweite Tagebuchentscheidung des Bundesverfassungsgericht (Federal Constitutional Court)’, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 1990, 1753–60.Google Scholar
Anonymous, Note (1930) Australian Law Journal 359.
Arnold, M. S., Green, T. A., Scully, S. A., and White, SD (eds), On the Laws and Customs of England (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Arnold, R., ‘Circumstances Importing an Obligation of Confidence’ (2003) 119 Law Quarterly Review 193.
Atiyah, P. S., and Summers, R. S., Form and Substance in Anglo-American Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Auvret, P., ‘Protection civile des droits de la personnalité’, Juris-Classeur Communication, 2002.
Bagshaw, R., ‘Obstacles on the Path to Privacy Torts’ in Birks, P. (ed.) Privacy and Loyalty (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1997).Google Scholar
Baird, D. G., ‘Common Law Intellectual Property and the Legacy of International News Service v Associated Press’ (1983) 50 University of Chicago Law Review411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, J. H., An Introduction to English Legal History (3rd edn) (London: Butterworths, 1990).Google Scholar
Barendt, E., ‘Privacy as a Constitutional Right and Value’ in Birks, P. (ed.) Privacy and Loyalty (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Barendt, E.,‘What Is the Point of Libel Law?’ [1999] Current Legal Problems110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barendt, E. M. (ed.), The Yearbook of Media and Entertainment Law 1995 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Barendt, E. M.‘Privacy and the Press’ in Barendt, E. M. (ed.), The Yearbook of Media and Entertainment Law 1995 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Barendt, E. M.Freedom of Speech (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Barnett, S. R., ‘The Right of Publicity Versus Free Speech in Advertising: Some Counter-Points to Professor McCarthy’ (1996) 18 Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal593.Google Scholar
Barnett, S. R., ‘The American Right of Publicity and Visual Art: Solutions for the Growing Conflict’ (Paper presented at the Congress of ATRIP, New Delhi, 6–8 October 2002).
Baston-Vogt, M., Der sachliche Schutzbereich des zivilrechtlichen allgemeinen Persönlichkeitsrechts (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1997).Google Scholar
Beckerman, J. S., ‘Adding Insult to Iniuria: Affronts to Honor and the Origins of Trespass’ in Arnold, M. S., Green, T. A., Scully, S. A., and White, S. D., (eds), On the Laws and Customs of England (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Beier, F. K., ‘The Law of Unfair Competition in the European Commmunity – Its Development and Present Status’ [1985] European Intellectual Property Review284.Google Scholar
Beignier, B., L'honneur et le droit, Paris 1995, Librairie Gènèrale de Droit et de Jurisprudence.Google Scholar
Beignier, B.,Le droit de la personnalité, Paris 1992, Presses Universitaires de France, collection Que sais-je?Google Scholar
Benn, S. I., ‘The Protection and Limitation of Privacy’ (1978) 52 Australian Law Journal601.Google Scholar
Bergmann, S., ‘Publicity Rights In the United States and Germany: A Comparative Analysis’ (1999) 19 LoyLA Ent LJ479.Google Scholar
Berkman, H. I., ‘The Right of Publicity-Protection For Public Figures and Celebrities’ (1976) 42 Brooklyn Law Review527.Google Scholar
Bertrand, A., Droit à la vie privée et droit à l'image (Paris: Litec, 1999).Google Scholar
Beuthien, V. and Schmölz, A. S., Persönlichkeitsschutz durch Persönlichkeitsgüterrechte, München: Beck, 1999.Google Scholar
Beuthien, V., ‘Postmortaler Persönlichkeitsschutz auf dem Weg ins Vermögensrecht’, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht 2003, 261–2.Google Scholar
Beuthien, V.,‘Was ist Vermögenswert, die Persönlichkeit oder ihr Image?Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 2003, 1220–2.Google Scholar
Beverley-Smith, H., The Commercial Appropriation of Personality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigot, C., ‘La poursuite de la rénovation du régime de l'atteinte à la vie privée’, D. 2003, 1854s.
Bigot, C.,‘Protection des droits de la personnalité et liberté de l'information’, Dalloz 1998, Chronique, 235 s.
Bingham, T., ‘Should There Be a Law to Protect Rights of Personal Privacy?’ [1996] European Human Rights Law Review450.Google Scholar
Birks, P., ‘The Academic and the Practitioner’ (1998) 18 Legal Studies397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, H. C. et al., Black's Law Dictionary (6th edn) (St Paul, Minn: West Publishing Co., 1990).Google Scholar
Bloustein, E. J., ‘Privacy as an Aspect of Human Dignity: An Answer to Dean Prosser’ (1964) 39 New York University Law Review962.Google Scholar
Bloustein, E. J.,‘Privacy is Dear at Any Price: A Response to Professor Posner's Economic Theory’ (1978) 12 GaLRev429.Google Scholar
Borchard, W., ‘The Common Law Right of Publicity is Going Wrong in the United States Supreme Court Reports’ [1992] Entertainment Law Review208.Google Scholar
Boyd, S., and Jay, R., ‘Image Rights and the Effect of the Data Protection Act 1998’ [2004] Entertainment Law Review159.Google Scholar
Brittan, L., ‘The Right of Privacy in England and the United States’ (1963) Tulane Law Review235.Google Scholar
Burns, P., ‘The Law of Privacy: The Canadian Experience’ (1976) 54 CanBarRev1.Google Scholar
Buxton, R., ‘The Human Rights Act And Private Law’ (2000) 116 Law Quarterly Review48.Google Scholar
Calcutt, D., Report of Press Self-Regulation Cm 2135 (London: HMSO, 1993).Google Scholar
Calcutt, D.,Report of the Committee on Privacy and Related Matters Cm1102 (London: HMSO 1990).Google Scholar
Canaris, C.-W., ‘Gewinnabschöpfung bei Verletzung des allgemeinen Persönlichkeitsrechts’ in Ahrens, Hans-Jürgen et al. (eds), Festschrift für Erwin Deutsch zum 70. Geburtstag (Köln: Carl Heymanns, 1999), pp. 85–109.Google Scholar
Canaris, C.-W.,‘Grundrechte und Privatrecht’, Archiv für die civilistische Praxis 184 (1984) 201–46.Google Scholar
Cane, P., ‘The Basis of Tortious Liability’ in Cane, P. and Stapleton, J. (eds), Essays for Patrick Atiyah (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Carter-Ruck, P. F., Carter-Ruck on Libel and Slander (4th edn) (London: Butterworths, 1992).Google Scholar
Carty, H., ‘Character Merchandising and The Limits of Passing Off1993 Legal Studies289.Google Scholar
Carty, H.,‘Dilution and Passing Off: Cause for Concern’ (1996) 112 Law Quarterly Review633.Google Scholar
Carty, H.,‘Heads of Damage in Passing Off’ [1996] European Intellectual Property Review487.Google Scholar
Carty, H.,‘Passing Off and the Concept of Goodwill’ [1995] JBL139.Google Scholar
Chromecek, M., and McCormack, S. C., World Intellectual Property Guidebook Canada, (New York: Mathew Bender, 1991).Google Scholar
Clayton, R., and Tomlinson, H., The Law of Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2000).Google Scholar
Cohen, F. S., ‘Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach’ (1935) 35 Columbia Law Review809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornish, W. R., ‘Genevan Bootstraps’ [1997] European Intellectual Property Review336.Google Scholar
Cornish, W. R., and Llewelyn, D., Intellectual Property (5th edn) (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2003).Google Scholar
Cotterell, R., ‘The Law of Property and Legal Theory’ in Twining, W. (ed.), Legal Theory and Common Law (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986).Google Scholar
Craig, J. D. R., ‘Invasion of Privacy and Charter Values: The Common Law Tort Awakens’ (1997) 42 McGill LJ355.Google Scholar
Cross, R., and Harris, J. W., Precedent in English Law (4th edn) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991).Google Scholar
D'Amato, A., ‘Comment on Professor Posner's Lecture on Privacy’ (1978) 12 GaLRev497.Google Scholar
Dasch, Norbert, Die Einwilligung zum Eingriff in das Recht am eigenen Bild (München: Beck, 1990).Google Scholar
David, René, English Law and French Law: A Comparison in Substance (London & Culcutta: Stevens & Sons/Eastern Law House, 1980).Google Scholar
de Haas, C., ‘France’, in Henry, M. (ed.), International Privacy, Publicity and Personality Laws (London: Butterworths, 2001) 136.Google Scholar
Decker, M., Aspects internes et internationaux de la protection de la vie privée en droits français, allemand et anglais, Presses Universitaires d'Aix-Marseille 2001.
Department of National Heritage, Privacy and Media Intrusion: The Government's Response Cm 2918 (London: HMSO, 1995).
Department of Trade and Industry, Reform of Trade Marks Law Cm 1203 (London: HMSO 1990).
Derieux, E., ‘Référé et liberté d‘expression’, JurisClasseur Périodique (Semaine Juridique) 1997, I, 4053.Google Scholar
Deutsch, E., ‘Medizinische Genetik und Genomanalyse’, Versicherungsrecht 1994, 1–5.Google Scholar
Dietz, A., Das Droit Moral des Urhebers im neuen französischen und deutschen Urheberrecht (München: Beck, 1968).Google Scholar
Dreier, T. und Gernot, S., Urheberrechtsgesetz, Kommentar (München: Beck, 2004).Google Scholar
Dreyer, E., ‘Image des personnes, Juris-Classeur Communication’, Fascicule 3750, 2002.
Drysdale, J., and Silverleaf, M., Passing Off Law and Practice (2nd edn) (London: Butterworths, 1994).Google Scholar
Dworkin, G., ‘The Common Law Protection of Privacy’ (1967) 2 U Tas LR418.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R., Taking Rights Seriously (London: Duckworth, 1977).Google Scholar
Eady, D., ‘A Statutory Right to Privacy’ [1996] European Human Rights Law Review243.Google Scholar
Epstein, R. A., ‘A Taste for Privacy? Evolution and the Emergence of a Naturalistic Ethic’ (1980) J Legal Studies605.Google Scholar
Epstein, R. A.,‘Privacy, Property Rights, and Misrepresentations’ (1978) 12 GaLRev455.Google Scholar
Erman, W. (ed.), Handkommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, vol. 1 (§§ 1–853), 11th edn (Münster: Aschendorff Rechtsverlag, 2004).Google Scholar
Faulks, N. Sir, Report of the Committee on Defamation, Cmnd 5909 (London: HMSO, 1975).Google Scholar
Fawcett, J. E. S., The Application of the European Convention on Human Rights (2nd edn) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Felcher, P. L. and Rubin, E. L., ‘Privacy, Publicity, and the Portrayal of Real People by the Media’ (1979) 88 Yale Law Journal1577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felcher, P. L. and Rubin, E. L.,‘The Descendibility of the Right of Publicity: Is There Commercial Life After Death?’ (1980) 89 Yale Law Journal1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, D., ‘Secrecy, Dignity, or Autonomy? Views of Privacy as a Civil Liberty’ (1994) 47 Current Legal Problems41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, D.,‘Human Dignity as a Legal Value – Part I’ [1999] Public Law 682, Part II [2000] Public Law 61.Google Scholar
Feldman, D.,‘Privacy-related Rights and Their Social Value’ in Birks, P. (ed.), Privacy and Loyalty (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Feldman, D.,‘The Developing Scope of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights’ [1997] European Human Rights Law Review265.Google Scholar
Fenwick, H., and Phillipson, G., ‘Confidence and Privacy: A Re-Examination’ (1996) 55 Cambridge Law Journal447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flagg, M. A., ‘Keeping the Right of Publicity Out of Canadian Law13 Intellectual Property Journal (Canada) (1999) 179.Google Scholar
Fleming, J. G., The American Tort Process (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Forkel, H., ‘Lizenzen an Persönlichkeitsrechten durch gebundene Rechtsübertragung’, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz undUrheberrecht 1988, 491–501.Google Scholar
Forkel, H.,Gebundene Rechtsübertragungen (Köln et al.: Carl Heymanns, 1977).
Freund, P. A., ‘Privacy: One Concept or Many?’ in Pennock, J. R. and Chapman, J. W. (eds), Privacy (New York: Atherton Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Fridman, G. H. L., Fridman on Torts (London: Waterlow, 1990).Google Scholar
Fried, C., ‘Privacy’ (1968) 77 Yale Law Journal475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaillard, E., ‘La double nature du droit à l'image et ses conséquences en droit positif français’, Dalloz 1984, Chronique, 161 s.
Gareis, K., ‘Das juristische Wesen der Autorenrechte, sowie des Firmen- und des MarkenschutzesAdHWR 35 (1877) 185–209.Google Scholar
Gavison, R., ‘Privacy and the Limits of Law’ (1980) 89 Yale Law Journal421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavison, R.,Privacy and Its Legal Protection, DPhil thesis, University of Oxford (1975).Google Scholar
Gerety, T., ‘Redefining Privacy’ (1977) 12 Harvard Civil Rights – Civil Liberties Law Review233.Google Scholar
Gibson, D., ‘Common Law Protection of Privacy: What To Do Until the Legislators Arrive’ in Klar, L. (ed.), Studies in Canadian Tort Law (Toronto: Butterworths, 1977), 343.Google Scholar
Gierke, O., Deutsches Privatrecht, vol. 1, Allgemeiner Teil und Personenrecht (Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, 1895).Google Scholar
Goodenough, O. R., ‘The Developement of the Right of Publicity in the United States’ [1992] European Intellectual Property Review55.Google Scholar
Goodman, E. J., ‘National Identity Crisis: The Need For a Federal Right of Publicity Statute’ (1999) 9 De Paul-LCA Journal of Art and Entertainment Law227.Google Scholar
Gordon, W. J., ‘On Owning Information: Intellectual Property and the Restitutionary Impulse’ (1992) 78 Virginia Law Review149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Götting, H.-P., ‘Sanktionen bei Verletzung des postmortalen PersönlichkeitsrechtsGewerblicher Rechtsschutz undUrheberrecht 2004, 801–8.Google Scholar
Götting, H.-P.,‘Die Vererblichkeit der vermögenswerten Bestandteile des Persönlichkeitsrechts – ein Meilenstein in der Rechtsprechung des Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Supreme Court)Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 2001, 585–7.Google Scholar
Götting, H.-P.,‘Persönlichkeitsmerkmale von verstorbenen Personen der Zeitgeschichte als MarkeGewerblicher Rechtsschutz undUrheberrecht 2001, 615–23.Google Scholar
Götting, H.-P.,Persönlichkeitsrechte als Vermögensrechte (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1995).Google Scholar
Gounalakis, G., Privacy and the Media. A Comparative Perspective (Munich: Beck, 2000).Google Scholar
Grabenwarter, C., ‘Schutz der Privatsphäre versus Pressefreiheit – Europäische Korrektur eines deutschen Sonderweges?Archiv für Presserecht 2004, 309–16.Google Scholar
Gregoritza, A., Die Kommerzialisierung von Persönlichkeitsrechen Verstorbener (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2003).Google Scholar
Gridel, J.-P., ‘Retour sur l'image du préfet assassiné: dignité de la personne humaine et liberté de l'information d'actualité’, Dalloz 2001, Chronique, 872 s.
Gross, H., ‘The Concept of Privacy’ (1967) 42 New York University Law Review34.Google Scholar
Grosz, S., Beatson, J. and Duffy, P., Human Rights: The 1998 Act and the European Convention (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2000).Google Scholar
Hamilton, M. A., et al., ‘Rights of Publicity: An In-Depth Analysis of the New Legislative Proposals to Congress’ (1998) 16 Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 209.Google Scholar
Harper, F. W., and James, F., The Law of Torts (Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1956).Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law (2nd edn) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Hauch, , ‘Protecting Private Facts in France: The Warren and Brandeis Tort is Alive and Well and Flourishing in Paris68 Tulane Law Review (1994) 1219.Google Scholar
Heldrich, A., ‘Der Persönlichkeitsschutz Verstorbener’, in Kuchinke, K. (ed.), Rechtsbewahrung und Rechtsentwicklung, Festschrift für Heinrich Lange zum 70. Geburtstag (München: Beck, 1970) pp. 163–78.Google Scholar
Heldrich, A.,‘Persönlichkeitsschutz und Pressefreiheit nach der Europäischen MenschenrechtskonventionNeue Juristische Wochenschrift 2004, 2634–6.Google Scholar
Helle, J., ‘Die Einwilligung beim Recht am eigenen BildArchiv für Presserecht 1985, 93–101.Google Scholar
Helle, J.,Besondere Persönlichkeitsrechte im Privatrecht (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1991).Google Scholar
Henkin, L., ‘Privacy and Autonomy’ (1974) 74 Columbia Law Review1410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, M., (ed.), International Privacy, Publicity and Personality Laws (London: Butterworths, 2001).Google Scholar
Heydon, J. D., Economic Torts (2nd edn) (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1978).Google Scholar
Hixson, R. F., Privacy in a Public Society (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Hoffman, S. J., ‘Limitations on the Right of Publicity’ (1980) Bulletin of the Copyright Society 111.
Holdsworth, W. S., ‘Defamation in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries’ (1924) 40 Law Quarterly Review302.Google Scholar
Honoré, A. M., ‘Ownership’ in Guest, A. (ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961).Google Scholar
Hoppe, T., Persönlichkeitsschutz durch Haftungsrecht (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2001).Google Scholar
Howell, R. G., ‘Is There an Historical Basis for the Appropriation of Personality Tort?’ (1988) 4 Intellectual Property Journal (Canada)265.Google Scholar
Howell, R. G.,‘Personality Rights: A Canadian Perspective: Some Comparisons With Australia’ (1990) 1 Intellectual Property Journal (Canada) (Australia) 212.Google Scholar
Howell, R. G.,‘The Common Law Appropriation of Personality Tort’ (1986) 2 Intellectual Property Journal (Canada)149.Google Scholar
Huet-Weiller, D., ‘La protection juridique de la voix humaine’, Revue Trimestrielle de Droit civil 1982, 497 s.
Hunt, M., ‘The “Horizontal Effect” of the Human Rights Act’ [1998] Public Law423.Google Scholar
Irvine, J., ‘The Appropriation of Personality’ in Gibson, D. (ed.), Aspects of Privacy Law (Toronto: Butterworths, 1980).Google Scholar
Jacobs, F. G., and White, R. C. A., The European Convention on Human Rights (2nd edn) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Jacoby, M. B., and Zimmerman, D. L., ‘Foreclosing on Fame: Exploring the Uncharted Boundaries of the Right of Publicity’ (2002) 77 New York University Law Review1322.Google Scholar
Jhering, R., Der Geist des römischen Rechts auf den verschiedenen Stufen seiner Entwicklung, vol. III (4th edn) (Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel, 1888).Google Scholar
Justice (Society), Committee on Privacy, Privacy and the Law (London: Stevens & Sons, 1970).
Kalven, H., ‘Privacy in Tort Law: Were Warren and Brandeis Wrong?’ (1966) 31 Law and Contemporary Problems326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Kamperman A., Unfair Competition Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Kayser, P., ‘Les droits de la personnalité. Aspects théoriques et pratiquesRevue Trimestrielle de Droit civil 1971, 445s.Google Scholar
Kayser, P., ‘Les pouvoirs du juge des référés civil à l’égard de la liberté de communication et d'expression’, D. 1989, Chronique, 11 s.
Kayser, P.,La protection de la vie privée par le droit, 3rd edn 1995, Economica & Presses Universitaires d'Aix-Marseille.Google Scholar
Keeton, W. P., Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts (5th edn) (St Paul: West Publishing Co., 1984).Google Scholar
Klar, L., (ed.), Studies in Canadian Tort Law (Toronto: Butterworths, 1977).Google Scholar
Klar, L. N., Tort Law (Toronto: Carswell, 1991).Google Scholar
Klippel, D., Der zivilrechtliche Schutz des Namens (Paderborn et al.: Schöningh, 1985).
Knaak, R., Das Recht der Gleichnamigen (Köln et al.: Carl Heymanns, 1979).
Köhler, H., and Piper, H., Gesetz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb, Kommentar (3rd edn) (München: Beck, 2002).Google Scholar
Kohler, J., ‘Die Idee des geistigen Eigenthums’, Archiv für die civilistische 82 (1894) 141.
Kohler, J.,Lehrbuch des Bürgerlichen Rechts, vol. 2, part 1 (Berlin: Carl Heymanns, 1906).Google Scholar
Kötz, H. und Wagner, G., Deliktsrecht (9. Aufl.) (Neuwied et al., Luchterhand: 2001).
Kwok, R., ‘Cardtoons v. Major League Baseball Players Association: Fair use or Foul Play?’ (1998) UCLA Ent L Rev315.Google Scholar
Lange, D., ‘Recognizing the Public Domain’ (1981) 44 Law and Contemp Prob147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langenbucher, K., ‘Argument by Analogy in European Law’ [1998] C.L.J.481–521.Google Scholar
Larenz, K. und Canaris, C.-W., Lehrbuch des Schuldrechts, vol. II/2 (13th edn) (München: Beck, 1994).Google Scholar
Leebron, D. W., ‘The Right to Privacy's Place in the Intellectual History of Tort Law’ (1991) 41 Case Western Reserve Law Review769.Google Scholar
Lehmann, M., ‘The Theory of Property Rights and the Protection of Intellectual and Industrial Property’ (1985) 16 IIC525.Google Scholar
Leigh, I., ‘Horizontal Rights, The Human Rights Act and Privacy: Lessons From the Commonwealth’ (1999) 48 International and Comparative Law Quarterly57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepage, A., ‘L'ampleur de la protection de la vie privée (de la célébrité et du temps quipasse)’ Communication – Commerce Electronique 1999, Chronique, p. 13 s.
Lepage, A., ‘L'indemnisation du préjudice résultant d'atteintes aux droits au respect de la vie privée et à l'image dans la jurisprudence récente’ Communication – Commerce Electronique juillet-août 2001, Chronique, p. 17 s.
Lepage, A.,Libertés et droits fondamentaux à l’épreuve de l'internet (Paris: Librairie Gènèrale de Droit et de Jurisprudence, 2002).Google Scholar
Lester, A. and Oliver, D. (eds), Constitutional Law and Human Rights (London: Butterworths, 1997).Google Scholar
Liddy, J., ‘Article 8: The Pace of Change’ (2000) 51 NILQ397.Google Scholar
Linden, L. M., Canadian Tort Law (4th edn) (Toronto: Butterworths, 1988).Google Scholar
Lindon, R., ‘Le juge des référés et la presse’ D. 1985, Chronique, 61 s.
Lindon, R.,Les droits de la personnalité (Paris: Dalloz, collection Dictionnaire juridique, 1983).Google Scholar
Logeais, I., ‘The French Right to One's Image: A Legal Lure?’, [1994] Ent. Law Rev163.Google Scholar
Logeais, I., Schroeder J-B., ‘The French Right of Image: An Ambiguous Concept Protecting The Human Persona’, 18 Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Journal (1998) 511.
Loiseau, G., ‘Des droits patrimoniaux de la personnalité en droit français42 Rev. Droit McGill (1997) 319.Google Scholar
Loiseau, G.,Le nom, objet d'un contrat (Paris: Librairie Gènèrale de Droit et de Jurisprudence, 1997).Google Scholar
Loucaides, L. G., ‘Personality and Privacy Under the European Convention on Human Rights’ (1990) 61 BYBIL 175.
Lucas-Schloetter, A., Droit moral et droits de la personnalité, Presses Universitaires d'Aix-Marseille 2002.
Lucas-Schlötter, A., ‘Die Rechtsnatur des Droit MoralGewerblicher Rechtsschutz undUrheberrecht, Internationaler Teil 2002, 809–15.Google Scholar
MacCormick, N., ‘A Note Upon Privacy’ (1973) 89 Law Quarterly Review23.Google Scholar
MacCormick, N., ‘Privacy: A Problem of Definition?’ (1974) 1 Journal of Legal Studies75.Google Scholar
Madow, M., ‘Private Ownership of Public Image: Popular Culture and Publicity Rights’ (1993) 81 California Law Review125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magold, H. A., Personenmerchandising (Frankfurt et al.: 1994).
Marino, L., ‘Les contrats portant sur l'image des personnes’, Communication – Commerce Electronique mars 2003, Chronique No. 7, pp. 10–12.
Marino, L.,Responsabilité civile, activité d'information et médias, Presses Universitaires d'Aix-Marseille-Economica 1997.Google Scholar
Markesinis, B. S., (ed.), Protecting Privacy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Markesinis, B. S., ‘Our Patchy Law of Privacy – Time to Do Something About It’ (1990) 53 Modern Law Review802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markesinis, B. S., ‘Privacy, Freedom of Expression, and the Horizontal Effect of the Human Rights Bill: Lessons From Germany’ (1999) 115 Law Quarterly Review47.Google Scholar
Markesinis, B. S.,The German Law of Obligations, Vol II, The Law of Torts: A Comparative Introduction (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Markesinis, B. S., and Enchelmaier, S., ‘The Applicability of Human Rights as Between Individuals Under German Constitutional Law’ in Markesinis, B. S., (ed.), Protecting Privacy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Markesinis, B. S., and Nolte, N., ‘Some Comparative Reflections on the Right of Privacy of Public Figures in Public Places’ in Birks, P. (ed.) Privacy and Loyalty (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Marsh, N. S., ‘Hohfeld and Privacy’ (1973) 89 Law Quarterly Review183.Google Scholar
Martino, T., Trademark Dilution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Massis, T., ‘Le secret du président et le juge des référés’, D. 1997, Chronique, 291 s.
McMullan, J., ‘Personality Rights in Australia’ (1997) 8 AIPJ86.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. T., The Rights of Publicity and Privacy (2nd edn) (New York: Clark Boardman Callaghan, 2001).Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. T.,McCarthy on Trade Marks and Unfair Competition (4th edn) (St Paul, Minn: West Publishing, 1999).Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. T.,The Rights of Publicity and Privacy (New York: Clark Boardman Callaghan, 1997).Google Scholar
McLean, D., ‘False Light Privacy’ (1997) 19 Communications Law63.Google Scholar
Medicus, D., Bürgerliches Recht (18th edn) (Köln, et al.: Carl Heymanns, 1999).
Metzger, A., Rechtsgeschäfte über das Droit moral im deutschen und französischen Urheberrecht (München: Beck, 2002).Google Scholar
Milmo, P., and Rogers, W. V. H., Gatley on Libel and Slander (10th edn) (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2004).Google Scholar
Montero, E., ‘La responsabilité civile des médias’, in Strowel, A. & Tulkens, F. (eds), Prévention et réparation des préjudices causés par les médias (Bruxelles: edn Larcier, 1998).Google Scholar
Morcom, C., Roughton, A., Graham, J., The Modern Law of Trade Marks (London: Butterworths, 1999).Google Scholar
Morgan, J., ‘Privacy, Confidence and Horizontal Effect: “Hello” Trouble’ (2003) 62 Cambridge Law Journal444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morison, W. L., ‘Unfair Competition and Passing Off – The Flexibility of a Formula’ (1956) 2 Sydney Law Review50.Google Scholar
Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (Civil Code), vol. 1 (§ § 1–240) (4th edn) (München: 2001).
Naismith, S. H., ‘Photographs, Privacy and Freedom of Expression’ [1996] European Human Rights Law Review150.Google Scholar
National Heritage Select Committee Fourth Report Privacy and Media Intrusion (London: HMSO, 1993).
Neill, B., ‘Privacy: A Challenge for the Next Century’ in Markesinis, B. S. (ed.) Protecting Privacy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Neill, B., and Rampton, R., Duncan and Neill on Defamation (2nd edn) (London: Butterworths, 1983).Google Scholar
Nicholas, B. N., An Introduction to Roman Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Nimmer, M. B., ‘The Right of Publicity’ (1954) 19 Law and Contemporary Problems203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Note (Anonymous), ‘An Actionable Right of Privacy? Roberson v. Rochester Folding Box Co’ (1902) 12 Yale Law Journal35.CrossRef
Note (Anonymous), ‘Development of the Law of Privacy’ (1894) 8 Harvard Law Review280.CrossRef
Note (Anonymous), ‘Is This Libel? More About Privacy’ (1894) 7 Harvard Law Review492.CrossRef
Note (Anonymous), ‘The Right to Privacy’ (1891) 5 Harvard Law Review148.CrossRef
Note (Anonymous), ‘The Right to Privacy’ (1898) 12 Harvard Law Review207.CrossRef
Ohly, A., ‘Generalklausel und Richterrecht’, Archiv für die civilistische 201 (2001) 1–47.
Ohly, A., ‘Harmonisierung des Persönlichkeitsrechts durch den Europäischen Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte?Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz undUrheberrecht, Internationaler Teil 2004, 902–12.Google Scholar
Ohly, A., ‘Volenti non fit iniuria’– die Einwilligung im Privatrecht (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2002).Google Scholar
Ohly, A.,Richterrecht und Generalklausel im Recht des unlauteren Wettbewerbs – ein Methodenvergleich des englischen und des deutschen Rechts (Köln et al.: Carl Heymanns, 1997).
Ohly, A., ‘Geistiges Eigentum?Juristenzeitung 2003, 545–54.Google Scholar
Pagenberg, J., ‘Protection of Get-Up and Character Merchandising Under German Law’[1987] IIC457–86.Google Scholar
Palandt, O., (ed.), Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (63rd edn) (München: Beck, 2004).Google Scholar
Peifer, K.-N., ‘Eigenheit oder Eigentum – Was schützt das Persönlichkeitsrecht?Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz undUrheberrecht 2002, 495–500.Google Scholar
Peifer, K.-N.,Individualität im Zivilrecht (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2001).Google Scholar
Pennock, J. R., and Chapman, J. W., (eds), Nomos XXII: Property (New York: New York University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Perreau, , ‘Des droits de la personnalité’, Revue Trimestrielle de Droit civil 1909, 501 s.Google Scholar
Phillipson, G., ‘Transforming Breach of Confidence? Towards a Common Law Right of Privacy Under the Human Rights Act’ (2003) 66 Modern Law Review726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillipson, G., and Fenwick, H., ‘Breach of Confidence as a Privacy Remedy in the Human Rights Act Era’ (2000) 63 Modern Law Review660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinckaers, J. C. S., From Privacy Towards a New Intellectual Property Right in Persona (The Hague: Kluwer, 1996).Google Scholar
Posner, R., ‘The Right of Privacy’ (1978) 12 Georgia Law Review393.Google Scholar
Potvin, L., ‘Protection Against the Use of One's Own Likeness’ (1997) 11 Intellectual Property Journal (Canada) 203 and 295.Google Scholar
Pringle, H., Celebrity Sells (Chichester, West Sussex: J. Wiley, 2004).Google Scholar
Prosser, W., ‘Privacy’ (1960) 48 California Law Review383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravanas, J., ‘Jouissance des droits civils. Protection de la vie privée. Mise en ouvre de la protection’, Juris-Classeur Civil, Art. 9, fascicule 20, 1996.
Ravanas, J., ‘Jouissance des droits civils. Protection de la vie privée. Délimitation de la protection’, Juris-Classeur Civil, Art. 9, fascicule 10, 1996.
Ravanas, J., ‘Liberté d'expression et protection des droits de la personnalité’, D. 2000, Chronique, 459 s.
Ravanas, J., ‘Retour sur quelques images’, D. 2002, Chronique, 1502 s.
Ravanas, J.,La protection des personnes contre la réalisation et la publication de leur image, Paris 1978, Librairie Gènèrale de Droit et de Jurisprudence.Google Scholar
Rein, I. J., Kotler, P. and Stoller, M. R., High Visibility (London: Heinemann, 1987).Google Scholar
Report of the Committee to Consider the Law on Copyright and Designs (Whitford Committee) Cmnd 6732 (London: HMSO 1977).
Robinson, R. S., ‘Preemption, the Right of Publicity, and a New Federal Statute’ (1998) 16 Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal183.Google Scholar
Rubenfeld, J., ‘The Right of Privacy’ (1989) 102 Harvard Law Review737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruijsenaars, H. E., Character Merchandising in Europe (Gaithersburg: 2003).Google Scholar
Savigny, F. K.., System des heutigen römischen Rechts (Berlin: 1840 et seq).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schack, H., Urheber- und Urhebervertragsrecht (3rd edn) (Tübingen: 2005).Google Scholar
Schack, H., ‘Case-note on Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Supreme Court), judgment of 1 December 1999 – “Marlene Dietrich”Juristenzeitung 2000, 1060–2.Google Scholar
Scheyhing, R., ‘Zur Geschichte des Persönlichkeitsrechts im 19. JahrhundertArchiv für die civilistische Praxis 158 (1959/60) 503–25.Google Scholar
Schricker, G., (ed.), Urheberrecht, Kommentar (2nd edn) (München: Beck, 1999).Google Scholar
Schwerdtner, E., Das Persönlichkeitsrecht in der deutschen Zivilrechtsordnung (Berlin: Schweitzer, 1977).Google Scholar
Seifert, F., ‘Postmortaler Schutz des Persönlichkeitsrechts und SchadensersatzNeue Juristische Wochenschrift 1999, 1889–97.Google Scholar
Seipp, D., ‘English Judicial Recognition of a Right of Privacy’ (1983) 3 OJLS325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanahan, D. R., ‘Image Filching in Australia: The Legal Provenance and Aftermath of the Crocodile Dundee Decisions’ (1991) 81 Trade Mark Reporter351.Google Scholar
Singer, E. M., ‘The Development of the Common Law Tort of Appropriation of Personality in Canada’ (1998) 15 Canadian Intellectual Property Review65.Google Scholar
Singh, R., and Strachan, J., ‘Privacy Postponed’ [2003] European Human Rights Law Review Special Issue 12.Google Scholar
Singh, R., and Strachan, J., ‘The Right to Privacy in English Law’ [2002] European Human Rights Law Review129.Google Scholar
Steffen, E., ‘Schmerzensgeld bei Persönlichkeitsverletzungen durch Medien – Ein Plädoyer gegen formelhafte Berechnungsmethoden bei der GeldentschädigungNeue Juristische Wochenschrift 1997, 10.Google Scholar
Stewart, S. M., International Copyright and Neighbouring Rights (2nd edn) (London: Butterworths, 1989).Google Scholar
Steyn, J., ‘Does Legal Formalism Hold Sway in England?’ [1996] Current Legal Problems43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strasser, M., ‘The Rational Basis of Trademark Protection Revisited: Putting the Dilution Doctrine into Context’ (2000) 10 Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal375.Google Scholar
Strömholm, S., Le droit moral de l'auteur en droit allemand, français et scandinave, vol. I (Stockholm: 1967).Google Scholar
Terrell, T. P., and Smith, J. S., ‘Publicity, Liberty and Intellectual Property: A Conceptual and Economic Analysis of the Inheritability Issue’ (1985) 34 Emory Law Journal1.Google Scholar
Tugendhat, M., and Christie, I., (eds), The Law of Privacy and the Media (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Twining, W., (ed.), Legal Theory and Common Law (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986).Google Scholar
Ullmann, E., ‘Caroline v., Marlene D., Eheleute M. – ein fast geschlossener Kreis’ Wettbewerb in Recht und Praxis 2000, 1049–54.
Ullmann, E., ‘Persönlichkeitsrechte in Lizenz?’ Archiv für Presserecht 1999, 209–14.
Ulmer, E., Urheber- und Verlagsrecht (3rd edn) (Berlin: Springer, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerven, W. et al., Tort Law, Common Law of Europe Casebooks, Oxford and Portland, 2000, Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Vaver, D., ‘What's Mine Is Not Yours: Commercial Appropriation of Personality Under the Privacy Acts of British Columbia, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan’ (1981) 15 University of British Columbia Law Review241.Google Scholar
Volokh, E., ‘Freedom of Speech and the Right of Publicity’ (2003) 40 Houston Law Review903Google Scholar
Wacks, R., ‘The Poverty of Privacy’ (1980) 96 Law Quarterly Review73.Google Scholar
Wacks, R.,Personal Information (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Wacks, R.,Privacy and Press Freedom (London: Blackstone Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Wade, W., ‘Horizons of Horizontality’ (2000) 116 Law Quarterly Review217.Google Scholar
Wadlow, C., The Law Of Passing Off (3rd edn) (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2004).Google Scholar
Wagner, G., ‘Ersatz immaterieller Schäden: Bestandsaufnahme und europäische PerspektivenJuristenzeitung 2004, 319–31.Google Scholar
Wagner, G., ‘Rudolph v. Jherings Theorie des subjektiven Rechts und der berechtigten ReflexwirkungenArchiv für die civilistische Praxis 193 (1993) 319–47.Google Scholar
Wagner, G., ‘Case-note on Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Supreme Court), judgment of 1 December 1999 – Der blaue EngelGewerblicher Rechtsschutz undUrheberrecht 2000, 717–20.Google Scholar
Warbrick, C., ‘The Structure of Article 8’ [1998] European Human Rights Law Review32.Google Scholar
Warren, S., and Brandeis, L., ‘The Right to Privacy’ (1890) 4 Harvard Law Review193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wee Loon, N. L., ‘Emergence of a Right to Privacy From Within the Law of Confidence?’ [1996] European Intellectual Property Review307.Google Scholar
Welkowitz, D. S., ‘Catching Smoke, Nailing Jell-O To a Wall: The Vanna White Case and the Limits of Celebrity Rights’ (1995) 3 J Intell Prop L67.Google Scholar
Wernick, W., Promotional Culture (London: Sage, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, A., ‘Data Protection and the Media’ [2003] European Human Rights Law Review Special Issue 25.Google Scholar
White, G. E., Tort Law in America – An Intellectual History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Wilson, W., ‘Privacy, Confidence and Press Freedom: A Study in Judicial Activism’ (1990) 53 Modern Law Review43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winfield, P. H., ‘Privacy’ (1931) 47 Law Quarterly Review23.Google Scholar
Wood, J. P., The Story of Advertising (New York: The Ronald Press Company, 1958).Google Scholar
World Intellectual Property Organisation, Model Provisions on Protection Against Unfair Competition (Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organisation, 1996).
World Intellectual Property Organisation, Protection Against Unfair Competition (Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organisation, 1994).
Young, A. L., ‘Remedial and Substantive Horizontality: the Common Law and Douglas v. Hello! Ltd’ [2003] Public Law232.Google Scholar
Younger, K., Report of the Committee on Privacy, Cmnd 5012, (London: HMSO, 1972).Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D. L., ‘Fitting Publicity Rights into Intellectual Property and Free Speech Theory: Sam, You Made the Pants Too Long!’ (2000) 19 De Paul LCA J Art Ent L283.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D. L., ‘Requiem for a Heavyweight: A Farewell to Warren and Brandeis's Privacy Tort’ (1983) 68 Cornell L Rev291.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Reinhard, The Law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zweigert, K., and Kötz, H., An Introduction to Comparative Law (3rd edn) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats