Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-cd4964975-ppllx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-03-30T06:32:55.689Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

6 - Order and change in world politics: the financial crisis and the breakdown of the US–China grand bargain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2014

Michael Mastanduno
Dartmouth College
G. John Ikenberry
Princeton University, New Jersey
Get access



War and Change reflects in intellectual terms both the remarkable ambition and pessimistic inclination of Robert Gilpin. Although much of his academic reputation has rested on work in international political economy, Gilpin focuses in War and Change on what he considers the core problem in international politics, hegemonic war. He views power transitions as inherently dangerous and searches for the elusive formula for peaceful change. He appreciates the value of stable international orders, while his analysis consistently demonstrates that over time the “law of uneven growth” and an array of other factors ensure that orders do not remain stable. International order is the key theme running through Gilpin’s work – how it is created and sustained, how and why it inevitably breaks down, how to survive the breakdown without the catastrophe of hegemonic war, and how to reconstruct order after major war.

Gilpin is a methodological pluralist but at its core his approach is that of a classical realist. War and Change focuses on the great powers. It is about the always precarious predicament of dominant states in a competitive environment, and about the calculations and strategies of rising challengers. It is about the integration of economics and security; written when the professional study of international relations developed a division of labor across these two subfields, Gilpin insisted that their synthesis and interplay was vital to comprehend world politics. War and Change emphasizes both the material and non-material aspects of national power. It highlights relative material capabilities but continually returns to the importance of prestige, reputation, and legitimacy as driving forces in great-power competition. Rather than adhering slavishly to the international level of analysis, Gilpin finds room for the meaningful impact of domestic structures and politics on the calculations and strategies of competing states. William Wohlforth argued recently that had War and Change received equal billing alongside Waltz’s seminal work, “scholars would not have been bewildered by change, bewitched by the balance of power, [or] blind to numerous potentially powerful realist theories.”

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Ikenberry, G. John, After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars (Princeton University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Mastanduno, Michael, “Economics and Security in Statecraft and Scholarship,” International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 4 (1998), pp. 825–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wohlforth, William, “Gilpinian Realism and International Relations,” International Relations, Vol. 25, No. 4 (2011), pp. 499–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilpin, Robert, War and Change in World Politics (Cambridge University Press, 1981), p. xiiiCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeown, Timothy, “Hegemonic Stability Theory and 19th Century Tariff Levels in Europe,” International Organization, Vol 31, No. 1 (1989), pp. 73–91Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John, After Victory, and Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order (Princeton University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Lake, David, Hierarchy in International Relations (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Art, Robert, A Grand Strategy for America (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Lake, David, “Leadership, Hegemony, and the International Economy,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 37 (1993), pp. 459–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snidal, Duncan, “The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory,” International Organization, Vol. 39 (1985), pp. 579–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mastanduno, Michael, “System Maker and Privilege Taker: US Power and the International Political Economy,” World Politics, Vol. 61, No. 1 (2009), pp. 121–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Arthur, “The Hegemon’s Dilemma: Great Britain, the United States, and the International Economic Order,” International Organization, Vol. 38, No. 2 (1984), pp. 355–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdier, Daniel, Democracy and International Trade: Britain, France, and the United States, 1860–1990 (Princeton University Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael and Duvall, Raymond, “Power in International Politics,” International Organization, Vol. 59 (Winter 2005), pp. 39–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilpin, does describe the logic of America’s hegemonic order in earlier work. See US Power and the Multinational Corporation (New York, NY: Basic Books, 1975), especially Chapter 4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posen, Barry, “Control of the Commons: The Military Foundation of US Hegemony, International Security, Vol. 28 (Summer 2003), pp. 5–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavin, Francis, “Ideas, Power and the Politics of US Monetary Policy during the 1960s,” in Kirshner, Jonathan, ed., Monetary Orders: Ambiguous Economics, Ubiquitous Politics (New York, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Dooley, Michael, et al., “The Revised Bretton Woods System,” International Journal of Finance and Economics, Vol. 9 (October 2004), pp. 307–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Stephen D., “The Superpower as Super-Debtor: Implications of Economic Disequilibria in U.S.-Asian Relations,” in Tellis, Ashley and Wills, Michael, eds., Strategic Asia 2006–07: Trade, Interdependence and Security (Seattle, WA: National Bureau of Asian Research, 2006), pp. 29–63Google Scholar
Mastanduno, Michael, “Preserving the Unipolar Moment: Realist Theories and U.S. Grand Strategy After the Cold War,” International Security, Vol. 21, No. 4 (1997), pp. 49–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, Albert’s classic, National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press [1945], 1981)Google Scholar
Ishihara, Shintaro, The Japan That Can Say No: Why Japan Will be First Among Equals (New York, NY: Simon & Schuster, 1991)Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry A., White House Years (Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1979), p. 1141Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert, “Sources of American-Japanese Economic Conflict,” in Ikenberry, G. John and Mastanduno, Michael, ed., International Relations Theory and the Asia-Pacific (New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 2003), pp. 299–322Google Scholar
Odell, John, US International Monetary Policy: Markets, Power, and Ideas as Sources of Change (Princeton University Press, 1982)Google Scholar
Song, Guoyou and Yuan, Wen Jin, “China’s Free Trade Agreement Strategies,” Washington Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 4 (2012), pp. 107–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlik, Tom and Davis, Bob, “Beijing Diversifies away from US Dollar,” Wall Street Journal, March 2, 2012, p. A1
Lahart, Justin and Whitehouse, Mark, “Families Slice Debt to Lowest in Six Years,” Wall Street Journal, March 11, 2011
Altman, Roger and Haass, Richard, “American Profligacy and American Power: The Consequences of Fiscal Irresponsibility,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 89 (November–December 2010)Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, Michael, The Frugal Superpower: America’s Global Leadership in a Cash-Strapped Era (New York, NY: Public Affairs, 2010)Google Scholar
Helleiner, Eric and Kirshner, Jonathan, ed., The Future of the Dollar (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Roach, Stephen, “Manchurian Paradox,” The National Interest, Vol. 101 (May/June 2009), pp. 59–65Google Scholar
Friedberg, Aaron, A Contest for Supremacy: China, America, and the Struggle for Mastery in Asia (New York, NY: Norton, 2012)Google Scholar
Medeiros, Evan, Cliff, Roger, Crane, Keith, and Mulvenon, James, A New Direction for China’s Defense Industry (Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Department of Defense, Office of the Secretary of Defense, Military Power of the People’s Republic of China 2009, Annual Report to Congress (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 2009)Google Scholar
Browne, A. and Fairclough, G., “China: Friend or Foe?” Wall Street Journal, April 18–19, 2009, pp. W1–W2
Goldstein, Avery, Rising to the Challenge: China’s Grand Strategy and International Security (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Lieberthal, Kenneth and Jisi, Wang, Addressing US-China Strategic Distrust (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, March 2012), pp. vii–viiiGoogle Scholar
Wright, Thomas, “How China Gambit Backfired,” The Diplomat, July 28, 2010
Sutter, Robert, “China’s Rise, the United States, and Asia’s Angst,” PacNet #41, September 13, 2010
Johnston, Alastair Iain, “How New and Assertive is China’s New Assertiveness?International Security, Vol. 37, No. 4 (2013), pp. 7–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Robert, “The Problem with the Pivot,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 91, No. 6 (2012), pp. 70–82Google Scholar
Ikenberry, John, “Rise of China and Future of the West,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 87 (Jan–Feb 2008), pp. 23–37Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John, “China’s Unpeaceful Rise,” Current History,Vol. 105 (April 2006), pp. 160–162Google Scholar
Gompert, David and Kelly, Terence, “How the Pentagon’s New Strategy Could Trigger War with China,” Foreign Policy, August 2, 2013, available at:

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats