Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-5db6c4db9b-mcx2m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-03-24T04:32:44.464Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

7 - Hegemony, nuclear weapons, and liberal hegemony

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2014

Daniel Deudney
Johns Hopkins University
G. John Ikenberry
Princeton University, New Jersey
Get access


Hegemony, nuclear weapons, and the American liberal order

The topic of hegemony has been of central concern to theorists of world politics at least since Thucydides, many of the leading figures of international theory have written about it, contemporary international theorists are still keenly thinking about it, and, with the relative decline in American power, it seems more relevant than ever. One of the leading works on the topic of hegemony, Robert Gilpin’s magisterial War and Change in World Politics was published at the end of the tumultuous decade of the 1970s in which it appeared that American power and the American liberal hegemonic order was waning fairly rapidly.

Often overlooked, however, is Gilpin’s larger project to understand large-scale and important change in human political life. Gilpin’s work on the logic of hegemonic systems, for which he is perhaps best known among IR scholars, was but one part of his larger body of work in which he addressed the range of theories about nuclear weapons, the implications of scientific-technological change for state power, and the ways in which state power and markets were changing in the era of American liberal hegemony and rapid economic “globalization.” What unites these works is Gilpin’s general quest to understand the interplay between changing material circumstances, particularly ones propelled by technological change, and various forms of political orders, internally and externally, particularly hierarchies and their interplay with more horizontal arrangements, particularly markets. And as an American writing in the American century, Gilpin has been keenly interested in exploring the prospects for the American liberal hegemony and the ways in which this order is like and unlike previous orders which have arisen and declined across history.

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Gilpin, Robert, War and Change in World Politics (Cambridge University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Brodie, Bernard, Jervis, Robert, and Waltz, Kenneth. Waltz, Kenneth, “Nuclear Myths and Political Realities,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 84, No. 3 (September 1990), pp. 731–744.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N., “The Emerging Structure of International Politics,” International Security, Vol. 18, No.2 (Fall 1993), pp. 44–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walt, Stephen M., Taming American Power: The Global Response to US Primacy (New York, NY: Norton, 2005).Google Scholar
Wohlforth, William C., “The Stability of a Unipolar World,” International Security, Vol. 24, No. 1 (Summer 1999), pp. 5–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Stephen G. and Wohlforth, William C., World Out of Balance: International Relations and the Challenge of American Primacy (Princeton University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Stuart J., Little, Richard, and Wohlforth, William C., eds., The Balance of Power in World History (London: Palgrave, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John, After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars (Princeton University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John, Liberal Order and Imperial Ambition (Cambridge: Polity, 2006)Google Scholar
Tellis, Ashley, Bially, Janice, Layne, Christopher, and McPherson, Melissa, Measuring National Power in the Postindustrial Age (Santa Monica, CA: RAND Arrayo Center, 2000)Google Scholar
Stoll, Richard J. and Ward, Michael, eds., Power in World Politics (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1989).Google Scholar
Brodie, Bernard, “War in the Atomic Age,” and “Implications for Military Strategy,” in Brodie, , ed., The Absolute Weapon: Atomic Power and World Order (New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & Co., 1946)Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert, The Meaning of the Nuclear Revolution: Statecraft and the Prospect of Armageddon (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Morgan, Patrick M., Deterrence Now (Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieber, Kier A. and Press, Daryl G., “The End of MAD? The Nuclear Dimension of U.S. Primacy,” International Security, Vol. 30, No. 4 (Spring 2006), pp. 7–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quester, George, Nuclear Monopoly (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 2000).Google Scholar
Odom, William E., The Collapse of the Soviet Military (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Goldstein, Avery, Deterrence and Security in the 21st Century: China, Britain, and Enduring Legacy of the Nuclear Revolution (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Posen, Barry R., Inadvertent Escalation: Conventional War and Nuclear Risks (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, The United States and the Great Powers: World Politics in the Twenty-First Century (Cambridge: Polity, 2004).Google Scholar
Chollet, Derek and Goldgeier, James, America Between the Wars (New York, NY: Public Affairs, 2008).Google Scholar
McNeill, William, The Pursuit of Power: Technology, Armed Force, and Society, AD 1000–1945 (University of Chicago Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Schwartz, Stephen I., ed., Atomic Audit: The Costs and Consequences of US Nuclear Weapons since 1940 (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1998).Google Scholar
Hersh, Seymour M., The Samson Option: Israel’s Nuclear Arsenal and American Foreign Policy (New York, NY: Random House, 1991).Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph, Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics (New York, NY: Public Affairs, 2004).Google Scholar
Wohlforth, William C., “Unipolarity, Power Competition, and Great Power War,” in Ikenberry, G. John, Mastanduno, Michael, and Wohlforth, William C., eds., International Relations Theory and the Consequences of Unipolarity (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Gulick, Edward V., Europe’s Classical Balance of Power (New York, NY: Norton, 1967)Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N., Theory of International Politics (New York, NY: Random House, 1979).Google Scholar
Kennedy, Paul, The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict, 1500 to 2000 (New York, NY: Random House, 1987).Google Scholar
Tammen, Ronald L., Kugler, Jacek, Lemke, Douglas, Alsharabati, Carole, Efird, Brian, and Organski, A.F.K., Power Transitions: Strategies for the 21st Century (New York, NY: Chatham House, 2000)Google Scholar
Gray, Colin S., The Second Nuclear Age (Boulder, CO: Lynne Reiner, 1999)Google Scholar
Herrera, Geoffrey L., Technology and International Transformation: The Railroad, the Atom Bomb and the Politics of Technological Change (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Reiss, Michael, Bridled Ambition: Why Countries Constrain Their Nuclear Capabilities (Washington DC: Wilson Center Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Smith, Derek D., Deterring America: Rogue States and the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (Cambridge University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavoy, Peter R., Sagan, Scott D., and Wirtz, James J., eds., Planning the Unthinkable: How New Powers Will Use Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Weapons (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Nau, Henry, Conservative Internationalism: Armed Diplomacy under Jefferson, Polk, Truman and Reagan (Princeton University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Corera, Gordon, Shopping for Bombs: Nuclear Proliferation, Global Insecurity, and the Rise and Fall of the A.Q. Khan Network (Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Langewiesche, William, The Atomic Bazaar: The Rise of the Nuclear Poor (New York, NY: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux, 2007).Google Scholar
Solingen, Etel, Nuclear Logics: Contrasting Paths in East Asia and the Middle East (Princeton University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Reed, Thomas C. and Stillman, Danny B., The Nuclear Express: A Political History of the Bomb and Its Proliferation (Minneapolis, MN: Zenith Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Posen, Barry, “US Security Policy in a Nuclear-Armed World, or What If Iraq Had Had Nuclear Weapons,” Security Studies, Vol. 6 (Spring 1997), pp. 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordlinger, Eric A., Isolationism Reconfigured: American Foreign Policy for a New Century (Princeton University Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Layne, Christopher, “From Preponderance to Offshore Balancing: America’s Future Grand Strategy,” International Security, Vol. 17, No. 4 (Spring 1993), pp. 5–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preble, Christopher, The Power Problem (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Allison, Graham, Nuclear Terrorism: The Ultimate Preventable Catastrophe (New York, NY: Henry Holt, 2004)Google Scholar
Falkenrath, Richard A., Newman, Robert D. and Thayer, Bradley, America’s Achilles Heel: Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Terrororism and Covert Attack (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles D. and Potter, William C., The Four Faces of Nuclear Terrorism (New York, NY: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar
Byman, Daniel, Deadly Connections: States that Sponsor Terrorism (Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, Robert, American Foreign Policy in a New Era (New York, NY: Routledge, 2005).Google Scholar
Mueller, John, Overblown: How Politicians and the Terrorism Industry Inflate National Security Threats and Why We Believe Them (New York, NY: Free Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Ikle, Fred Charles, Annihilation from Within: The Ultimate Threat to Nations (New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betts, Richard, “The Soft Underbelly of American Primacy: Tactical Advantages of Terror,” Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 117, No. 1 (2002), pp. 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, Audrey Kurth and Ludes, James M., ed., Attacking Terrorism: Elements of a Grand Strategy (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Andreas, Peter and Nadelmann, Ethan, Policing the Globe: Criminalization and Crime Control in International Relations (Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Carr, Matthew, The Infernal Machine: A History of Terrorism from the Assassination of Tsar Alexander II to Al-Qaeda (New York, NY: New Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Laqueur, Walter, The New Terrorism: Fanaticism and the Arms of Mass Destruction (Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, Barak, Combating Jihadism: American Hegemony and Interstate Cooperation in the War on Terrorism (University of Chicago Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Kroenig, Matthew and Stowsky, Jay, “War Makes States, But Not As It Pleases: Homeland Security and American Anti-Statism,” Security Studies, Vol. 15, No. 2 (2006), pp. 225–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deudney, Daniel, “Omniviolence, Arms Control, and Limited Government,” in Macedo, Stephen and Tulis, Jeffrey, ed., The Limits of Constitutionalism (Princeton University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Cirincione, Joseph, Bomb Scare: The History and Future of Nuclear Weapons (New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Boulden, Jane and Weiss, Thomas G., ed., Terrorism and the UN: Before and After September 11 (Bloomington, IN: University of Indiana Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Cortwright, David and Lopez, George A., eds., United Against Terror: Cooperative Nonmilitary Responses to the Global Terrorist Threat (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats