Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-7f7b94f6bd-98q29 Total loading time: 0.457 Render date: 2022-06-30T14:26:03.301Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

15 - Testing international trade law: Empirical studies of GATT/WTO dispute settlement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2009

Marc L. Busch
Associate Professor, Queen's School of Business, Queen's University, Ontario
Eric Reinhardt
Assistant Professor of Political Science, Emory University
Daniel L. M. Kennedy
University of Minnesota
James D. Southwick
University of Minnesota
Get access


Law did play an important role in this lawyerless multilateral trade order, but which one?

Roessler (1999, 10)


Dispute settlement under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and its successor, the World Trade Organization (WTO), is the very “backbone of the multilateral trading system” (Moore 2000). Indeed, despite being likened to a “court with no bailiff” (Rossmiller 1994, 263), the GATT/WTO system is widely touted as the most successful of any comparable institution today (Hudec 1993, 353; Petersmann 1997, 63–65; Moore 2000). Add to this that the WTO's Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) has corrected many of the shortcomings of GATT 1947, and it is little wonder that most observers are even more optimistic about the future. Until recently, however, there has been virtually no empirical evidence brought to bear on the most important questions in the field. Why do countries take some of their complaints to GATT/WTO and prosecute others unilaterally, “out of court”? Why are some disputes settled with liberalization by the defendant, while the status quo prevails in others? And has greater legalization of the system made dispute settlement more efficacious? Taking Robert Hudec's Enforcing International Trade Law as its point of departure, a growing literature has begun to tackle these and related questions, testing hypotheses against data on the hundreds of complaints filed since 1948. Some of the results confirm prevailing views about the political economy of GATT/WTO dispute settlement.

The Political Economy of International Trade Law
Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec
, pp. 457 - 481
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Bayard, Thomas O. & Kimberly Ann Elliott (1994) Reciprocity and Retaliation in U.S. Trade Policy (Washington, DC: Institute for Int'l Economics)
Bello, Judith Hippler & Alan, F. Holmer (1998) GATT Dispute Settlement Agreement: Internationalization v. Elimination of Section 301, 26(3) Inter'l Lawyer795–803Google Scholar
Bhagwati, Jagdish N. (2000) The World Trading System at Risk (Princeton University Press)
Blackhurst, Richard, Bill, Lyakurwa & Ademola, Oyejide (2000) Options for Improving Africa's Participation in the WTO, 23(4) World Economy491–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, Chad P. (1999) Trade Disputes and the Implementation of Protection under the GATT: An Empirical Assessment, Typescript, Brandeis University
Busch, Marc L. (2000a) Accommodating Unilateralism? U.S. Section 301 and GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement, Typescript, Queen's School of Business
Busch, Marc L. (2000b), Democracy, Consultation, and the Paneling of Disputes under GATT, 44(4) J. Conflict Res.425–446CrossRef
Castel, Jean-Gabriel (1989) The Uruguay Round and the Improvements to the GATT Dispute Settlement Rules and Procedures, 38 (Oct.) Int' l & Comp. L.Q.834–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chayes, Abram & Antonia, Handler Chayes (1993) On Compliance, 47(2) Int' l Org. 175–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davey, William J. (1993) An Overview of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, in vol. I, Handbook of gatt Dispute Settlement 7–75 (Irvington-on-Hudson, NY: Transnational Juris, Pierre Pescatore, William J. Davey & Andreas F. Lowenfeld eds.)
Garrett, Geoffrey & James McCall Smith (1999) The Politics of WTO Dispute Settlement, Typescript, George Washington University
Goldman, Julie (1999) Bad Lawyering or Ulterior Motive? Why the United States Lost the Film Case before the WTO Dispute Settlement Panel, 30 L. & Pol' y Int' l Bus. 417–437Google Scholar
Hoekman, Bernard M. & Petros, C. Mavroidis (2000) WTO Dispute Settlement, Transparency, and Surveillance, 23(4) World Economy527–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, Henrik, Håkan Nordström & Petros C. Mavroidis (1999) Is the Use of the WTO Dispute Settlement System Biased? CEPR Discussion Paper 2340, Centre for Economic Policy Research
Hudec, Robert E. (1970) The GATT Legal System: A Diplomat's Jurisprudence, 4 J. World Trade L. 615–665Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert E. (1975) The gatt Legal System and World Trade Diplomacy (Praeger)
Hudec, Robert E. (1987) “Transcending the Ostensible”: Some Reflections on the Nature of Litigation Between Governments, 72 Minnesota L. Rev.211–226
Hudec, Robert E. (1990) Thinking about the New Section 301: Beyond Good and Evil, inAggressive Unilateralism: America' s 301 Trade Policy and the World Trading System 113–159 (University of Michigan Press, Jagdish Bhagwati & Hugh T. Patrick eds.)
Hudec, Robert E. (1993) Enforcing International Trade Law: The Evolution of the Modern gatt Legal System (Salem, NH: Butterworth Legal Publishers)
Hudec, Robert E. (1996) International Economic Law: The Political Theatre Dimension, 17 J. Int' l Econ. L.9–15
Hudec, Robert E. (1999) The New WTO Dispute Settlement Procedure: An Overview of the First Three Years, 8 Minnesota J. Global Trade1–53
Hudec, Robert E., Daniel, L. M. Kennedy & Mark, Sgarbossa (1993) A Statistical Profile of GATT Dispute Settlement Cases, 1948–1989, 2 Minnesota J. Global Trade1–100Google Scholar
Iida, Keisuke (1999) Between Power and Principle: Multilateral Trade Dispute Settlement Revisited, Typescript, Aoyama Gakuin University, Tokyo
Jackson, John H. (1989) The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Economic Relations (MIT Press)
Jackson, John H. (1998) The World Trade Organization: Constitution and Jurisprudence (London: Royal Institute of International Affairs)
Jackson, John H. (2000) The Jurisprudence of gatt and the WTO: Insights on Treaty Law and Economic Relations (Cambridge University Press)
Katzenstein, Peter J. (1985) Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe (Cornell University Press)
Krugman, Paul (1993) Regionalism versus Multilateralism: Analytical Notes, inNew Dimensions in Regional Integration 58–79 (Cambridge University Press, Jaime de Melo & Arvind Panagariya eds.)
Kuruvila, Pretty Elizabeth (1997) Developing Countries and the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism, 31(6) J. World Trade171–208Google Scholar
Michalopoulos, Constantine (1999) The Developing Countries in the WTO, 22(1) World Economy117–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mnookin, Robert H. & Robert, Wilson (1998) A Model of Efficient Discovery, 25(2) Games & Economic Behavior219–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montaña i Mora, Miquel (1993) A GATT with Teeth: Law Wins over Politics in the Resolution of International Trade Disputes, 31(1) Columbia J. Transnat' l L.103–180Google Scholar
Moore, Michael (2000) WTO's Unique System of Settling Disputes Nears 200 Cases in 2000, WTO Doc. PRESS/180, World Trade Organization
Mota, Sue Ann (1999) The World Trade Organization: An Analysis of Disputes, 25 North Carolina J. Int' l L. & Comm' l Reg.75–104Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost (2000) Enforcement and Countermeasures in the WTO: Rules are Rules –Toward a More Collective Approach, 94 American J. Int' l L.335–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pescatore, Pierre (1993) The GATT Dispute Settlement Mechanism: Its Present Situation and its Prospects, 10(1) J. Int' l Arb.27–42Google Scholar
Pescatore, Pierre, William J. Davey, & Andreas F. Lowenfeld (1991) Handbook of gatt Dispute Settlement (Ardsley-on-Hudson, NY: Transnational Juris)
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (1994) The Dispute Settlement System of the World Trade Organization and the Evolution of the GATT Dispute Settlement System Since 1948, 31 Common Market L. Rev.1157–1244Google Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (1997) The gatt/WTO Dispute Settlement System: International Law, International Organizations, and Dispute Settlement (London: Kluwer)
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich & Gunther Jaenicke eds. (1992) Adjudication of International Trade Disputes in International and National Economic Law (Fribourg, Switzerland: University Press)
Reinhardt, Eric (1996) Posturing Parliaments: Ratification, Uncertainty, and International Bargaining, Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University
Reinhardt, Eric (1999) Tying Hands without a Rope: Rational Domestic Response to International Institutional Constraints, Typescript, Emory University
Reinhardt, Eric (2000a) Aggressive Multilateralism: The Determinants of GATT/WTO Dispute Initiation, 1948–1998, Typescript, Emory University
Reinhardt, Eric (2000b) To GATT or Not to GATT: Which Trade Disputes Does the U.S. Litigate, 1975–1999? Typescript, Emory University
Reinhardt, Eric (forthcoming 2001) Adjudication without Enforcement in GATT Disputes, 45 J. Conflict Res.
Rodrik, Dani (1997) Has Globalization Gone Too Far? (Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics)
Roessler, Frieder (1999) Foreword, inRobert E. Hudec, Essays on the Nature of International Trade Law 10–14 (London: Cameron May)
Rossmiller, George E. (1994) Discussion, inAgricultural Trade Conflicts and gatt 262–265 (Denver, Co: Westview Press, Giovanni Anania, Colin A. Carter & Alex F. McCalla eds.)
Ruggiero, Renato (1998a) From Vision to Reality: The Multilateral Trading System at Fifty, WTO doc. PRESS/94, World Trade Organization
Ruggiero, Renato (1998b) The Future of the World Trading System, World Trade Organization, available at
Sevilla, Christina R. (1998) Explaining Patterns of GATT/WTO Trade Complaints, Working Paper 98–1, Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University
South Centre (1999) Issues Regarding the Review of the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism, Trade-Related Agenda, Development, and Equity Working Paper No. 1, South Centre, available at
Trade and Development Centre (1999) Agreement Establishing the Advisory Centre on WTO Law, Typescript, Trade and Development Centre, available at
Bogdandy, Armin (1992) The Non-Violation Procedure of Article XXIII:2 GATT–Its Operational Rationale, 26(4) J. World Trade95–111Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (1995a) Communication from the United States, WTO doc. WT/INF/1, World Trade Organization
World Trade Organization (1995b) vol. II Guide to gatt Law and Practice (World Trade Organization ed.)
World Trade Organization (2000a) Overview of the State-of-Play of WTO Disputes, World Trade Organization, available at
World Trade Organization (2000b) The Netherlands Donate 2.6 Million Dutch Guilders to WTO Technical Assistance Fund, WTO doc. PRESS/186, World Trade Organization
Young, Michael K. (1995) Dispute Resolution in the Uruguay Round: Lawyers Triumph over Diplomats, 29(2) Int' l Lawyer389–409Google Scholar
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats