Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-mdtzd Total loading time: 0.705 Render date: 2021-10-18T18:35:11.968Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2020

Andreas H. Jucker
Affiliation:
Universität Zürich
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Politeness in the History of English
From the Middle Ages to the Present Day
, pp. 192 - 207
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

A New Academy of Compliments: or, the Lover’s Secretary: Being Wit and Mirth Improved, by the Most Elegant Expressions Used in the Art of Courtship. (1784) 17th ed., with additions. London: J. Bew.Google Scholar
Benson, Larry D. (1987) The Riverside Chaucer. 3rd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. See also www.courses.fas.harvard.edu/.Google Scholar
Campbell, Gordon (ed.). (1995) Ben Jonson. Volpone, or the Fox, Epicene, or The Silent Woman, The Alchemist, Bartholomew Fair. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chesterfield, Philip Dormer Stanhope, Earl of. (1778) The Beauties of Chesterfield: or, Remarks on Politeness, and of Knowing the World: Containing Necessary Instructions to Complete the Gentleman and Man of Fashion. Edinburgh: Robert Jamieson.Google Scholar
Collier, Jeremy. (2011) A Short View of the Immorality and Profaneness of the English Stage Together with the Sense of Antiquity Upon this Argument [1699]. Repr. Charleston: BiblioBazaar.Google Scholar
Davis, Norman (ed.). (1967) Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Doyle, Leonard J. (1948) Rule For Monasteries by Benedict, Saint Abbot of Monte Cassino. Collegeville: The Liturgical Press.Google Scholar
Evans, G. Blakemore, (ed.). (1974) The Riverside Shakespeare. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Evans, G. Blakemore, (ed.). (2003) Shakespeare, William. Romeo and Juliet. Updated ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jonson, Ben. Bartholomew Fair. In Campbell, Gordon (ed.). (1995) Ben Jonson: Volpone, or the Fox, Epicene, or The Silent Woman, The Alchemist, Bartholomew Fair. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 327433.Google Scholar
Jonson, Ben. Volpone, or the Fox. In Campbell, Gordon (ed.). (1995) Ben Jonson: Volpone, or the Fox, Epicene, or The Silent Woman, The Alchemist, Bartholomew Fair. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1117.Google Scholar
King James Bible Online (1611), www.kingjamesbibleonline.org.Google Scholar
Lewis, Matthew. (1796) The Monk, http://lion.chadwyck.co.uk/.Google Scholar
Lillo, George. ‘The London Merchant, or The History of George Barnwell’. In Lindsay, David W. (ed.). (1993) The Beggar’s Opera and Other Eighteenth-Century Plays. London: J. M. Dent, 259326.Google Scholar
Lindelöf, Uno Lorenz. (1909–14) Der Lambeth-Psalter: eine altenglische Interlinearversion des Psalters in der Hs. 427 der erzbischöflichen Lambeth Palace Library. Helsingfors: Druckerei der Finnischen Litteraturgesellschaft.Google Scholar
The New Academy of Complements, Erected for Ladies, Gentlewomen, Courtiers, Gentlemen, Scholars, Souldiers, Citizens, Country-men, and All Persons of What Degree Soever, of Both Sexes. (1681) London: George Sawbridge.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Lewis E. (ed.). (1991) The Vercelli Book Homilies: Translations from the Anglo-Saxon. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Schröer, Arnold, and Gneuss, Helmut. (1964) Die angelsächsischen Prosabearbeitungen der Benediktinerregel. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Scragg, Donald. (1992) The Vercelli Homilies and Related Texts. EETS 300. Oxford: Boydell & Brewer.Google Scholar
Steele, Richard. (1993) ‘The Conscious Lovers’. In Lindsay, David W. (ed.), The Beggar’s Opera and Other Eighteenth-Century Plays. London: J. M. Dent, 65143.Google Scholar
Tolkien, Christopher (ed.). (2006) Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, Pearl and Sir Orfeo. Trans. by J. R. R. Tolkien. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
The Wits Academy: or, The Muses Delight. (1677) London and Westminster: n.p.Google Scholar
Anglo-Saxon Dictionary Online, ed. Thomas Northcote Toller et al., comp. Sean Christ and Ondřej Tichý. Faculty of Arts, Charles University in Prague, www.bosworthtoller.com/.Google Scholar
Historical Thesaurus of the Oxford English Dictionary, www.oed.com/thesaurus.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary, www.oed.com/.Google Scholar
Thesaurus of Old English. (2018) University of Glasgow, http://oldenglishthesaurus.arts.gla.ac.uk.Google Scholar
British National Corpus (BYU-BNC), www.english-corpora.org/bnc/.Google Scholar
Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA), www.english-corpora.org/coca/.Google Scholar
Corpus of Early Modern Dialogues 1560–1760 (CED), http://ota.ox.ac.uk/desc/2507.Google Scholar
Corpus of Historical American English (COHA), www.english-corpora.org/coca/.Google Scholar
Corpus of Late Modern English Texts (CLMET3.0), https://perswww.kuleuven.be/~u0044428/clmet3_0.htm.Google Scholar
Dictionary of Old English Web Corpus (2009), https://tapor.library.utoronto.ca/doecorpus/index.html.Google Scholar
London-Lund Corpus of Spoken English, http://ota.ox.ac.uk/desc/0168.Google Scholar
Spoken British National Corpus 2014, http://corpora.lancs.ac.uk/bnc2014/.Google Scholar
Aiden, Erez, and Michel, Jean-Baptiste. (2013) Uncharted: Big Data as a Lens on Human Culture. New York: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin. (1996) Conversational Routines in English: Convention and Creativity. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Alexander, Michael. (2007) A History of English Literature. Basingstoke: Macmillan Palgrave.Google Scholar
Algeo, John. (2001) The Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol. 6: English in North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca, and Harris, Sandra. (2006) ‘Politeness at work: Issues and challenges’. Journal of Politeness Research 2, 733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baugh, Albert C., and Cable, Thomas. (2002) A History of the English Language. 5th ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beetz, Manfred. (1990) Frühmoderne Höflichkeit. Komplimentierkunst und Gesellschaftsrituale im altdeutschen Sprachraum. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzlersche Verlagsbuchhandlung.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beetz, Manfred. (1999) ‘The polite answer in pre-modern German conversation culture’. In Jucker, Andreas H., Fritz, Gerd and Lebsanft, Franz (eds.), Historical Dialogue Analysis. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 139–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, Larry D. (1987) The Riverside Chaucer. 3rd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Berger Jr, Harry. (2002) ‘Sprezzatura and the absence of grace’. In Javitch, Daniel (ed.), Baldesar Castiglione: The Book of the Courtier. The Singleton Translation. An Authoritative Text, Criticism. New York: Norton, 295307.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan and Finegan, Edward. (1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Blake, Norman F. (ed.). (1992) The Cambridge History of the English Language. Volume 2: 1066–1476. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. (1992) ‘The metapragmatics of politeness in Israeli society’. In Watts, Richard J., Ide, Sachiko and Ehlich, Konrad (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 255–80.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, and House, Juliane. (1989) ‘Cross-cultural and situational variation in requesting behavior’. In Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, House, Juliane and Kasper, Gabriele (eds.), Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood: Ablex, 123–54.Google Scholar
Bouchara, Abdelaziz. (2009) Politeness in Shakespeare: Applying Brown and Levinson’s Politeness Theory to Shakespeare’s Comedies. Hamburg: Diplomica.Google Scholar
Bousfield, Derek. (2008) Impoliteness in Interaction. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 167. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bousfield, Derek, and Locher, Miriam (eds.). (2008) Impoliteness in Language: Studies on Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Language, Power and Social Process 21. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Breuer, Anja, and Geluykens, Ronald. (2007) ‘Variation in British and American English requests: A contrastive study’. In Kraft, Bettina and Geluykens, Ronald (eds.), Cross-Cultural Pragmatics and Interlanguage English. München: Lincom, 107–25.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. (2007) ‘The development of I mean: Implications for the study of historical pragmatics’. In Fitzmaurice, Susan M. and Taavitsainen, Irma (eds.), Methodological Issues in Historical Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 3779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger, and Gilman, Albert. (1960) ‘The pronouns of power and solidarity’. In Sebeok, Thomas A. (ed.), Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 253–76.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger, and Gilman, Albert. (1989) ‘Politeness theory and Shakespeare’s four major tragedies’. Language in Society 18.2, 159212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Levinson, Stephen C.. (1978) ‘Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena’. In Goody, Esther (ed.), Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 56310.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Levinson, Stephen C.. (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryson, Anna. (1998) ‘From courtesy to civility’. In Changing Codes of Conduct in Early Modern England. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Burchfield, Robert (ed.). (1994) The Cambridge History of the English Language. Volume 5: English in Britain and Overseas: Origins and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burke, Peter. (2002) ‘The courtier abroad: Or, the uses of Italy’. In Javitch, Daniel (ed.), Baldesar Castiglione: The Book of the Courtier. The Singleton Translation. An Authoritative Text, Criticism. New York: Norton, 388400. Originally published in Georg Kauffmann (ed.). (1991) Die Renaissance im Blick der Nationen Europas. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, 1–14.Google Scholar
Burlin, Robert B. (1995) ‘Middle English romance: The structure of the genre’. The Chaucer Review 30.1, 114.Google Scholar
Burnley, David. (1983) A Guide to Chaucer’s Language. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnley, David. (2003) ‘The T/V pronouns in later Middle English literature’. In Taavitsainen, Irma and Jucker, Andreas H. (eds.), Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 107. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busse, Beatrix. (2006) Vocative Constructions in the Language of Shakespeare. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 150. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busse, Ulrich. (1998) ‘“Stand, sir, and throw us that you have about ye”: Zur Grammatik und Pragmatik des Anredepronomens “ye” in Shakespeares Dramen’. In Klein, Eberhard and Schierholz, Stefan J. (eds.), Betrachtungen zum Wort. Lexik im Spannungsfeld von Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag, 85115.Google Scholar
Busse, Ulrich. (2002a) Linguistic Variation in the Shakespeare Corpus. Morpho-Syntactic Variability of Second Person Pronouns. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 106. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busse, Ulrich. (2002b) ‘Changing politeness strategies in English requests: A diachronic investigation’. In Fisiak, Jacek (ed.), Studies in English Historical Linguistics and Philology: A Festschrift for Akio Oizumi. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang, 1735.Google Scholar
Busse, Ulrich. (2003) ‘The co-occurrence of nominal and pronominal address forms in the Shakespeare Corpus: Who says thou or you to whom?’ In Taavitsainen, Irma and Jucker, Andreas H. (eds.), Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 107. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 193221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busse, Ulrich. (2008) ‘An inventory of directives in Shakespeare’s King Lear’. In Jucker, Andreas H. and Taavitsainen, Irma (eds.), Speech Acts in the History of English. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 85114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busse, Ulrich, and Busse, Beatrix. (2010) ‘Shakespeare’. In Jucker, Andreas H. and Taavitsainen, Irma (eds.), Historical Pragmatics. Handbooks of Pragmatics 8. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 247–81.Google Scholar
Busse, Ulrich, and Axel, Hübler. (2012) ‘Introduction’. In Busse, Ulrich and Hübler, Axel (eds.), Investigations into the Meta-Communicative Lexicon of English: A Contribution to Historical Pragmatics. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 220. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, James. (1991) ‘The first Christian kings’. In Campbell, James (ed.), The Anglo-Saxons. London: Penguin Books, 4569.Google Scholar
Chapman, Don. (2008) ‘“You belly-guilty bag”: Insulting epithets in Old English’. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 9.1, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, P. A. W. (1957) ‘Restoration comedy’. In Ford, Boris (ed.), From Dryden to Johnson. The Pelican Guide to English Literature 4. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 156–72.Google Scholar
Cooper, Helen. (1996) Oxford Guides to Chaucer: The Canterbury Tales. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, David, and Crystal, Ben. (2002) Shakespeare’s Words: A Glossary and Language Companion. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. (1996) ‘Towards an anatomy of impoliteness’. Journal of Pragmatics 25, 349–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. (2009) ‘The metalanguage of impoliteness: Using sketch engine to explore the Oxford English Corpus’. In Baker, Paul (ed.), Contemporary Corpus Linguistics. Contemporary Studies in Linguistics. London: Continuum, 6486.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. (2010) ‘Conventionalised impoliteness formulae’. Journal of Pragmatics 42, 3232–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. (2011a) Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. (2011b) ‘Politeness and impoliteness’. In Andersen, Gisle and Aijmer, Karin (eds.), Pragmatics of Society. Handbooks of Pragmatics 5. Berlin: de Gruyter, 393438.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. (2017) ‘The influence of Italian manners on politeness in England, 1550–1620’. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18.2, 195213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Archer, Dawn. (2008) ‘Requests and directness in Early Modern English trial proceedings and play texts, 1640–1760’. In Jucker, Andreas H. and Taavitsainen, Irma (eds.), Speech Acts in the History of English. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 4584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Demmen, Jane. (2011) ‘Nineteenth-century English politeness: Negative politeness, conventional indirect requests and the rise of the individual self’. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12.1–2, 4981.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Gillings, Mathew. (2018) ‘Politeness variation in England: A north-south divide?’ In Brezina, Vaclav, Love, Robbie and Aijmer, Karin (eds.), Corpus Approaches to Contemporary British Speech. Sociolinguistic Studies of the Spoken BNC2014. New York: Routledge, 3359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Hardaker, Claire. (2017) ‘Impoliteness’. In Culpeper, Jonathan, Haugh, Michael and Kádár, Dániel (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness. London: Palgrave, 199225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Haugh, Michael and Kádár, Dániel Z (eds.). (2017) The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Merja, Kytö. (2000) ‘Data in historical pragmatics: Spoken discourse (re)cast as writing’. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1.2, 175–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Terkourafi, Marina. (2017) ‘Pragmatic approaches to (im)politeness’. In Culpeper, Jonathan, Haugh, Michael and Kádár, Dániel (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (im)Politeness. London: Palgrave, 1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, Lawrence S., and Reich, John J.. (2006) Cultures and Values: A Survey of Humanities. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Davis, Norman (ed.). (1967) Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. Edited by Tolkien, J. R. R. and Gordon, E. V., 2nd ed. edited by Davis, Norman. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
De Roo, Harvey. (1997) ‘What’s in a name? Power dynamics in “Sir Gawain and the Green Knight”’. The Chaucer Review 31.3, 232–55.Google Scholar
Del Lungo Camiciotti, Gabriella. (2008) ‘Two polite speech acts from a diachronic perspective: Aspects of the realisation of requesting and undertaking commitments in the nineteenth-century commercial community’. In Jucker, Andreas H. and Taavitsainen, Irma (eds.), Speech Acts in the History of English. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 115–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hans-Jürgen, Diller, de Smet, Hendrik and Jukka, Tyrkkö. (2010) ‘A European database of descriptors of English electronic texts’. The European English Messenger 19.2, 2935.Google Scholar
Eelen, Gino. (2001) A Critique of Politeness Theories. Encounters 1. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Evans, William W. (1967) ‘Dramatic use of the second-person singular pronoun in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight’. Studia Neophilologica 39.1, 3845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. Blakemore (ed.). (2003) Romeo and Juliet. Updated edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fennell, Barbara A. (2001) A History of English: A Sociolinguistic Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Finkenstaedt, Thomas. (1963) ‘You’ and ‘Thou’: Studien zur Anrede im Englischen. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan. (2010) ‘Changes in the meaning of politeness in eighteenth-century England: Discourse analysis and historical evidence’. In Culpeper, Jonathan and Kadar, Daniel Z. (eds.), Historical (Im)politeness. Bern: Peter Lang, 87115.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan. (2016) ‘Sincerity and the moral reanalysis of politeness in late modern English: Semantic change and contingent polysemy’. In Chapman, Don, Moore, Colette and Wilcox, Miranda (eds.), Generalizing vs. Particularizing Methodologies in Historical Linguistic Analysis. TiEL 94. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 173201.Google Scholar
Ford, Martyn, and Legon, Peter. (2003) The How to Be British Collection. Brighton: Lee Gone Publications.Google Scholar
Fox, Kate. (2004) Watching the English: The Hidden Rules of English Behaviour. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Fries, Udo. (1985) Einführung in die Sprache Chaucers: Phonologie, Metrik und Morphologie. Anglistische Arbeitshefte 20. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fries, Udo. (1999) ‘“His name with laud and with dew honour rayse”: A text- and pragmalinguistic study of Thomas Morley’s “Introduction to Practicall Musicke” (1597)’. In Falkner, Wolfgang and Schmid, Hans-Jörg (eds.), Words, Lexemes, Concepts: Approaches to the Lexicon. Tübingen: Gunter Narr, 235–46.Google Scholar
Fries, Udo, and Schneider, Peter. (2000) ‘ZEN: Preparing the Zurich English Newspaper Corpus’. In Ungerer, Friedrich (ed.), English Media Texts Past and Present. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 80. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillingham, John. (2002) ‘From civilitas to civility: Codes of manners in medieval and early modern England’. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 12, 267–89.Google Scholar
Gossett, Suzanne. (2000) Ben Jonson: Bartholomew Fair. Revels Student Editions. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Grainger, Karen. (2011) ‘“First order” and “second order” politeness: Institutional and intercultural contexts’. In Linguistic Politeness Research Group (eds.), Discursive Approaches to Politeness. Mouton Series in Pragmatics 8. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 167–88.Google Scholar
Grainger, Karen, Kerkam, Zainab, Mansor, Fathia and Mills, Sara. (2015) ‘Offering and hospitality in Arabic and English’. Journal of Politeness Research 11.1, 4170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grainger, Karen, and Mills, Sara. (2016) Directness and Indirectness across Cultures. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, Elizabeth. (2011) ‘Fellow students: Hamlet, Horatio and the Early Modern University’. Shakespeare Quarterly 62.2, 205–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael, and Chang, Wei-Lin Melody. (2019) ‘“The apology seemed (in)sincere”: Variability in perceptions of (im)politeness’. Journal of Pragmatics 142, 207–22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.11.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, Richard M. (ed.). (1992) The Cambridge History of the English Language. Volume 1: The Beginnings to 1066. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet. (1984) ‘Modifying illocutionary force’. Journal of Pragmatics 8, 345–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet. (1988) ‘Paying compliments: A sex preferential politeness strategy’. Journal of Pragmatics 12.4, 445–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet. (1993) ‘New Zealand women are good to talk to: An analysis of politeness strategies in interaction’. Journal of Pragmatics 20.2, 91116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet. (1995) Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Honegger, Thomas. (2003) ‘“And if ye wol nat so, my lady sweete, thanne preye I thee, […].” Forms of address in Chaucer’s Knight’s Tale’. In Taavitsainen, Irma and Jucker, Andreas H. (eds.), Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 107. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 6184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honegger, Thomas. (2004) ‘Nominal forms of address in Middle English: Pet names and terms of endearment between lovers’. In Bode, Christoph, Domsch, Sebastian and Sauer, Hans (eds.), Anglistentag 2003. Proceedings. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, 3955.Google Scholar
Honegger, Thomas. (2005) ‘“Wyʒe welcum iwys to this place” – and never mind the alliteration: An inquiry into the use of forms of address in two alliterative ME romances’. In Ritt, Nikolaus and Schendl, Herbert (eds.), Rethinking Middle English: Linguistic and Literary Approaches. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 169–78.Google Scholar
Hope, Jonathan. (1994) ‘The use of thou and you in Early Modern spoken English: Evidence from depositions in the Durham ecclesiastical court records’. In Kastovsky, Dieter (ed.), Studies in Early Modern English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 141–52.Google Scholar
Hope, Jonathan. (2003) Shakespeare’s Grammar. London: The Arden Shakespeare.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Geoffrey. (1991) Swearing: A Social History of Foul Language, Oaths and Profanity in English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hynes, Peter. (2004) ‘Richard Steele and the genealogy of sentimental drama: A reading of The Conscious Lovers’. Papers on Language and Literature 40.2, 142–67.Google Scholar
Ide, Sachiko. (1989) ‘Formal forms and discernment: Two neglected aspects of linguistic politeness’. Multilingua 8.2–3, 223–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Susan. (2006) ‘Beginnings and transitions: Old English’. In Mugglestone, Lynda (ed.), The Oxford History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3260.Google Scholar
Itakura, Hiroko. (2001) ‘Describing conversational dominance’. Journal of Pragmatics 33, 1859–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsson, Mattias. (2002) ‘“Thank you” and “thanks” in Early Modern English’. ICAME Journal 26, 6380.Google Scholar
Janicki, Karol. (1989) ‘A rebuttal of essentialist sociolinguistics’. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 78, 93105.Google Scholar
Janicki, Karol. (1990) Toward Non-Essentialist Sociolinguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. (2000a) ‘“Thou” in the history of English: A case for historical semantics or pragmatics?’ In Dalton-Puffer, Christiane and Ritt, Nikolaus (eds.), Words: Structure, Meaning, Function. A Festschrift for Dieter Kastovsky. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 153–63.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. (2000b) ‘English historical pragmatics: Problems of data and methodology’. In Martino, Gabriella di and Lima, Maria (eds.), English Diachronic Pragmatics. Naples: CUEN, 1755.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. (2006a) ‘“Thou art so loothly and so oold also”: The use of ye and thou in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales’. Anglistik 17.2, 5772.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. (2006b) ‘“but ‘tis believed that … ”: Speech and thought presentation in early English newspapers’. In Brownlees, Nicholas (ed.), News Discourse in Early Modern Britain. Selected Papers of CHINED 2004. Bern: Peter Lang, 105–25.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. (2008) ‘Politeness in the history of English’. In Dury, Richard, Gotti, Maurizio and Dossena, Marina (eds.), English Historical Linguistics 2006. Volume II: Lexical and Semantic Change. Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 14), Bergamo, 21–25 August 2006. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. (2010) ‘“In curteisie was set ful muchel hir lest”: Politeness in Middle English’. In Culpeper, Jonathan and Kádár, Dániel Z (eds.), Historical (Im)politeness. Linguistic Insights 65. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 175200.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. (2011a) ‘Positive and negative face as descriptive categories in the history of English’. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12.1–2, 178–97.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. (2011b) ‘Chauser-no The Canterbury Tales niokeru koshou’ [Terms of address in Geoffrey Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales: A case study], translated into Japanese by Yuko Higashiizumi. In Takada, Hiroyuki, Shiina, Michi and Onodera, Noriko (eds.), Rekishigoyouron nyuumon: Kakono komyunikieeshonwo fukugensuru. Tokyo: Taishukan: 130–42.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. (2012a) ‘Changes in politeness cultures’. In Nevalainen, Terttu and Traugott, Elizabeth (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English. New York: Oxford University Press, 422–33.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. (2012b) ‘“These imputations are too common, sir”: Politeness in Early Modern English dialogues: The case of Ben Jonson’s Volpone, or The Fox’. In Mazzon, Gabriella and Fodde, Luisanna (eds.), Historical Perspectives on Forms of English Dialogue. Metodi e Prospettive. Milan: FrancoAngeli, 4058.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. (2012c) ‘“What’s in a name?”: Names and terms of address in Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet’. In Chevalier, Sarah and Honegger, Thomas (eds.), Words, Words, Words: Philology and Beyond. Festschrift for Andreas Fischer on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto, 7797.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. (2014) ‘Courtesy and politeness in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight’. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 49.3, 528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. (2015) ‘Höflichkeit im Theater der englischen Renaissance: Ben Jonson’s Bartholomew Fair’. Wolfenbütteler Renaissance-Mitteilungen 36.2, 7788.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. (2016) ‘Politeness in eighteenth-century drama: A discursive approach’. Journal of Politeness Research 12.1, 95115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., and Kopaczyk, Joanna. (2017) ‘Historical (im)politeness’. In Culpeper, Jonathan, Haugh, Michael and Kádár, Dániel (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness. London: Palgrave, 433–59.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., and Landert, Daniela. (2015) ‘Historical pragmatics and early speech recordings: Diachronic developments in turn-taking and narrative structure in radio talk shows’. Journal of Pragmatics 79, 2239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., and Locher, Miriam A.. (2017) ‘Introducing Pragmatics of Fiction: Approaches, trends and developments’. In Locher, Miriam A. and Jucker, Andreas H. (eds.), Pragmatics of Fiction. Handbooks of Pragmatics 12. Berlin: de Gruyter, 121.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., and Staley, Larssyn. (2017) ‘(Im)politeness and developments in methodology’. In Culpeper, Jonathan, Haugh, Michael and Kádár, Dániel (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (im)Politeness. London: Palgrave, 403–29.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., and Taavitsainen, Irma. (2000) ‘Diachronic speech act analysis: Insults from flyting to flaming’. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1.1, 6795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., and Taavitsainen, Irma. (2003) ‘Diachronic perspectives on address term systems: Introduction’. In Taavitsainen, Irma and Jucker, Andreas H. (eds.), Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 107. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., and Taavitsainen, Irma. (2013) English Historical Pragmatics. Edinburgh Textbooks on the English Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., and Taavitsainen, Irma. (2014) ‘Complimenting in the history of American English: A metacommunicative expression analysis’. In Taavitsainen, Irma, Jucker, Andreas H. and Tuominen, Jukka (eds.), Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 243. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 257–76.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., Taavitsainen, Irma and Schneider, Gerold. (2012) ‘Semantic corpus trawling: Expressions of “courtesy” and “politeness” in the Helsinki Corpus’. In Suhr, Carla and Taavitsainen, Irma (eds.), Developing Corpus Methodology for Historical Pragmatics. Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 11. Helsinki: Research Unit for Variation, Contacts and Change in English. Available online at www.helsinki.fi/varieng/series/volumes/11/jucker_taavitsainen_schneider/.Google Scholar
Kampf, Zohar, and Danziger, Roni. (2018) ‘“You dribble faster than Messi and jump higher than Jordan”: The art of complimenting and praising in political discourse’. Journal of Politeness Research 15.1, https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2016-0044.Google Scholar
Kasper, Gabriele. (2003) ‘Politeness’. In Verschueren, Jef, Östman, Jan-Ola, Blommaert, Jan and Bulcaen, Chris (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 120.Google Scholar
Klein, Lawrence. (1994a) Shaftsbury and the Culture of Politeness: Moral Discourse and Cultural Politics in Early Eighteenth-Century England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Lawrence. (1994b) ‘“Politeness” as linguistic ideology in late seventeenth- and eighteenth-century England’. In Stein, Dieter and Ingrid van Ostade, Tieken-Boon (eds.), Towards a Standard English 1600–1800. Topics in English Linguistics 12. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 3150.Google Scholar
Kleinke, Sonja, and Birte, Bös. (2015) ‘Intergroup rudeness and the metapragmatics of its negotiation in online discussion fora’. Pragmatics 25.1, 4771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knappe, Gabriele, and Michael, Schümann. (2006) ‘Thou and ye: A collocational-phraseological approach to pronoun change in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales’. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 42, 213–38.Google Scholar
Kohnen, Thomas. (2008a) ‘Directives in Old English: Beyond politeness?’ In Jucker, Andreas H. and Taavitsainen, Irma (eds.), Speech Acts in the History of English. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohnen, Thomas. (2008b) ‘Linguistic politeness in Anglo-Saxon England? A study of Old English address terms’. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 9.1, 140–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohnen, Thomas. (2011) ‘Understanding Anglo-Saxon “politeness”: Directive constructions with ic wille / ic wolde’. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12.1–2, 230–54.Google Scholar
Kohnen, Thomas. (2012) ‘Performative and non-performative uses of speech-act verbs in the history of English’. In Busse, Ulrich and Hübler, Axel (eds.), Investigations into the Meta-Communicative Lexicon of English: A Contribution to Historical Pragmatics. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 220. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 207–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohnen, Thomas. (2017) ‘Non-canonical speech acts in the history of English’. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 65.3, 303–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kong, Kenneth C. C. (1998) ‘Politeness of service encounters in Hong Kong’. Pragmatics 8.4, 555–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopytko, Roman. (1993) Polite Discourse in Shakespeare’s English. Poznan: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adam Mickiewicza w Poznaniu.Google Scholar
Kopytko, Roman. (1995) ‘Linguistic politeness strategies in Shakespeare’s plays’. In Jucker, Andreas H. (ed.), Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 35. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 515–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kytö, Merja. (2010) ‘Data in historical pragmatics’. In Jucker, Andreas H. and Taavitsainen, Irma (eds.), Historical Pragmatics. Handbooks of Pragmatics 8. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 3367.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. (1973) ‘Language and woman’s place’. Language in Society 2, 4580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. (1975) Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin T. (2005) ‘Civility and its discontents: Or, getting in your face’. In Lakoff, Robin T. and Ide, Sachiko (eds.), Broadening the Horizon of Linguistic Politeness. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 139. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langford, Paul. (1989) A Polite and Commercial People: England 1727–1783. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Langford, Paul. (2002) ‘The uses of eighteenth-century politeness’. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 12, 311–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lass, Roger (ed.). (1999) The Cambridge History of the English Language. Volume 3: 1476–1776. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Hans Martin, Keller, Caren auf dem and Ruef, Beni. (2006) ‘ZEN Corpus 1.0’. In Facchinetti, Roberta and Rissanen, Matti (eds.), Corpus-based Studies of Diachronic English. Bern: Peter Lang, 135–55.Google Scholar
Leitner, Magdalena. (2013) ‘Thou and you in Late Middle Scottish and Early Modern Northern English witness depositions’. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 14.1, 100–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitner, Magdalena, and Jucker, Andreas H.. (forthcoming) ‘Historical sociopragmatics’. In Haugh, Michael, Kádár, Dániel Z and Terkourafi, Marina (eds.), Handbook of Sociopragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lindsay, David W. (ed.). (1993) The Beggar’s Opera and Other Eighteenth-century Plays. London: J. M. Dent.Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam. (2008) ‘The rise of prescriptive grammars on English in the 18th century’. In Locher, Miriam and Strässler, Jürg (eds.), Standards and Norms in the English Language. Contributions to the Sociology of Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 127–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., and Graham, Sage L. (eds.). (2010) Interpersonal Pragmatics. Handbooks of Pragmatics 6. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., and Watts, Richard J.. (2005) ‘Politeness theory and relational work’. Journal of Politeness Research 1, 933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutzky, Ursula, and Demmen, Jane. (2013) ‘Pray in Early Modern English drama’. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 14.2, 263–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, Sylvia Kasey. (1986) ‘Clarissa as conduct book’. South Atlantic Review 51.4, 316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzon, Gabriella. (2000) ‘Social relations and forms of address in the Canterbury Tales’. In Kastovsky, Dieter and Mettinger, Arthur (eds.), The History of English in a Social Context: A Contribution to Historical Sociolinguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 135–68.Google Scholar
Mazzon, Gabriella. (2003) ‘Pronouns and nominal address in Shakespearean English: A socio-affective marking system in transition’. In Taavitsainen, Irma and Jucker, Andreas H. (eds.), Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 107. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 223–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzon, Gabriella. (2010) ‘Terms of address’. In Jucker, Andreas H. and Taavitsainen, Irma (eds.), Historical Pragmatics. Handbooks of Pragmatics 8. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 351–76.Google Scholar
Meier, Andrea J. (1995) ‘Passages of politeness’. Journal of Pragmatics 24, 381–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, Ian. (1987) The Teaching of English, from the Sixteenth Century to 1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, Jean-Baptiste, Shen, Yuan Kui, Aiden, Aviva Presser, Veres, Adrian, Gray, Matthew K., The Google Books Team, Pickett, Joseph P., Hoiberg, Dale, Clancy, Dan, Norvig, Peter, Orwant, Jon, Pinker, Steven, Nowak, Martin A. and Aiden., Erez Lieberman (2010) ‘Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books’. Science 331.6014, 176–82.Google ScholarPubMed
Mills, Sara. (2011) ‘Discursive approaches to politeness and impoliteness’. In Linguistic Politeness Research Group (eds.), Discursive Approaches to Politeness. Mouton Series in Pragmatics 8. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 1956.Google Scholar
Mills, Sara. (2017) English Politeness and Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce. (1995) An Invitation to Old English and Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mugglestone, Lynda (ed.). (2006) The Oxford History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, M. Lynne, and De Felice, Rachele. (2018) ‘Routine politeness in American and British English requests: Use and non-use of please’. Journal of Politeness Research 15.1, 77100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mustanoja, Tauno F. (1960) A Middle English Syntax. Part I. Parts of Speech. Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 23. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Nathan, N. (1956) ‘Pronouns of address in the Friar’s Tale’. Modern Language Quarterly 17, 3942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathan, N. (1959) ‘Pronouns of address in the Canterbury Tales’. Mediaeval Studies xxi, 193201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, Birgitt. (2011) ‘Domestic tragedy: George Lillo’s The London Merchant, or The History of George Barnwell’. In Baumbach, Sibylle, Neumann, Birgit and Nünning, Ansgar (eds.), A History of British Drama: Genres – Developments – Model Interpretations. Trier: WVT Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier, 158–75.Google Scholar
Nevala, Minna. (2003) ‘Family first: Address and subscription formulae in English family correspondence from the fifteenth to the seventeenth century’. In Taavitsainen, Irma and Jucker, Andreas H. (eds.), Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 107. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 147–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevala, Minna, and Sairio, Anni. (2017) ‘Discord in eighteenth-century genteel correspondence’. In Säily, Tanja, Nurmi, Arja, Palander-Collin, Minna and Auer, Anita (eds.), Exploring Future Paths for Historical Sociolinguistics. Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 7. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 109–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu, and Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena. (1995) ‘Constraints on politeness: The pragmatics of address formulae in Early English correspondence’. In Jucker, Andreas H. (ed.), Historical Pragmatics. Pragmatic Developments in the History of English. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 35. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 541601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu, and Tissari, Heli. (2010) ‘Contextualising eighteenth-century politeness: Social distinction and metaphorical levelling’. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Eighteenth-Century English: Ideology and Change. Studies in English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 133–58.Google Scholar
Newton, Sarah Emily. (1990) ‘Wise and foolish virgins: “Usable fiction” and the early American conduit tradition’. Early American Literature 25.2, 139–67.Google Scholar
Nicholls, Jonathan. (1985) The Matter of Courtesy: Medieval Courtesy Books and the Gawain-Poet. Woodbridge: D. S. Brewer.Google Scholar
Novak, Maximillian E. (1979) ‘The sentimentality of “The Conscious Lovers” revisited and reasserted’. Modern Language Studies 9.3, 4859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nünning, Vera, and Ansgar, Nünning. (1998) Englische Literatur des 18. Jahrhunderts. Uni-Wissen Anglistik, Amerikanistik. Stuttgart: Klett.Google Scholar
Ozoux, Mireille. (2002) ‘Lecture de The Conscious Lovers de Richard Steele (1728): sémantique et éthique-le concept de “gentility” repris et revisité’. Etudes Epistémè 2, 159–99.Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth. (1954) Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior, Part 1. Glendale: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Pinto, Derrin. (2011) ‘Are Americans insincere? Interactional style and politeness in everyday America’. Journal of Politeness Research 7, 215–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Placencia, María Elena. (2008) ‘Requests in corner shop transactions in Ecuadorian Andean and Coastal Spanish’. In Schneider, Klaus P. and Barron, Anne (eds.), Variational Pragmatics: A Focus on Regional Varieties in Pluricentric Languages. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 178. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 307–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey and Svartvik, Jan. (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena. (1996) ‘Forms of address in early English correspondence’. In Nevalainen, Terttu and Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena (eds.), Sociolinguistics and Language History: Studies Based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 167–81.Google Scholar
Reber, Elisabeth. (2018) Quoting in Parliamentary Question Time. A Short-term Diachronic Study of an Evidential Practice. Unpublished Habilitation thesis, University of Potsdam.Google Scholar
Ridealgh, Kim, and Jucker, Andreas H.. (2019) ‘Late Egyptian, Old English and the re-evaluation of discernment politeness in remote cultures’. Journal of Pragmatics 144, 5666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, F. N. (ed.). (1933) The Complete Works of Geoffrey Chaucer. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne (ed.). (1998) The Cambridge History of the English Language. Volume 4: 1776–1997. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sato, Shie. (2008) ‘Use of “please” in American and New Zealand English’. Journal of Pragmatics 40, 1249–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. (1969) Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. (1979) Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sell, Roger D. (1985) ‘Tellability and politeness in “The Miller’s Tale”: First steps in literary pragmatics. English Studies’. A Journal of English Language and Literature 66.6, 496512.Google Scholar
Sell, Roger D. (1991) ‘The politeness of literary texts’. In Sell, Roger D. (ed.), Literary Pragmatics. London: Routledge, 208–24.Google Scholar
Sell, Roger D. (2000) Literature as Communication. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 78. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shvanyukova, Polina. (2019) ‘Promoting negative politeness in nineteenth-century England: The case of letter-writing manuals’. In Paternoster, Annick and Fitzmaurice, Susan (eds.), Politeness in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 299. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 171–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singman, Jeffrey L., and Will, McLean. (1995) Daily Life in Chaucer’s England. Westport: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Skeat, W. W. (ed.). (1894) Complete Works of Geoffrey Chaucer. Oxford.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. (2011) ‘Conceptualising “the relational” in pragmatics: Insights from metapragmatic emotion and (im)politeness comments’. Journal of Pragmatics 43, 3565–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen, and Franklin, Peter. (2009) Intercultural Interaction: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Intercultural Communication. Research and Practice in Applied Linguistics. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Wilson, Deidre. (1981) ‘Irony and the use-mention distinction’. In Cole, Peter (ed.), Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 295318.Google Scholar
Stein, Dieter. (2003) ‘Pronominal usage in Shakespeare: Between sociolinguistics and conversational analysis’. In Taavitsainen, Irma and Jucker, Andreas H. (eds.), Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 107. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 251307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Miranda. (2005) ‘Politeness in Britain: “It’s only a suggestion … ”’. In Hickey, Leo and Stewart, Miranda (eds.), Politeness in Europe. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 116–29.Google Scholar
Studer, Patrick. (2008) Historical Corpus Stylistics: Media, Technology and Change. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, and Jucker, Andreas H.. (2007) ‘Speech act verbs and speech acts in the history of English’. In Fitzmaurice, Susan M. and Taavitsainen, Irma (eds.), Methods in Historical Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 107–38.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, and Jucker, Andreas H.. (2008) ‘“Methinks you seem more beautiful than ever”: Compliments and gender in the history of English’. In Jucker, Andreas H. and Taavitsainen, Irma (eds.), Speech Acts in the History of English. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 195228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, and Jucker, Andreas H.. (2010) ‘Expressive speech acts and politeness in eighteenth-century English’. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Eighteenth-Century English: Ideology and Change. Studies in English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 159–81.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, and Jucker, Andreas H.. (2015) ‘Twenty years of historical pragmatics: Origins, developments and changing thought styles’. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16.1, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, and Jucker, Andreas H.. (2016) ‘Forms of address’. In Hough, Carole (ed.). Oxford Handbook of Names and Naming. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 427–37.Google Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina. (2011) ‘From Politeness1 to Politeness2: Tracking norms of im/politeness across time and space’. Journal of Politeness Research 7, 159–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Keith. (2018) In Pursuit of Civility: Manners and Civilization in Early Modern England. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. (2014) ‘Eighteenth-century English normative grammars and their readers’. In Rutten, Gijsbert, Vosters, Rik and Vandenbussche, Wim (eds.), Norms and Usage in Language History, 1600–1900: A Sociolinguistic and Comparative Perspective. Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 3. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 129–50.Google Scholar
Triandis, Harry C. (1994) Culture and Social Behavior. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly. (2014) A History of the English Language. Rev. ed. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans, and Los, Bettelou (eds.). (2006) The Handbook of The History of English. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Terry. (2003) ‘You and thou in Early Modern English dialogues: Patterns of usage’. In Taavitsainen, Irma and Jucker, Andreas H. (eds.), Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 107. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 309–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Terry. (2007) ‘Thou’ and ‘You’ in Early Modern English Dialogues: Trials, Depositions, and Drama Comedy. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 158. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, David. (1992) ‘Bourgeois tragedy or sentimental melodrama? The significance of George Lillo’s The London Merchant’. Eighteenth-Century Studies 25.2, 123–43.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J. (1989) ‘Relevance and relational work: Linguistic politeness as politic behavior’. Multilingua 8.2–3, 131–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J. (1991) Power in Family Discourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J. (1992) ‘Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behaviour: Reconsidering claims for universality’. In Watts, Richard J., Ide, Sachiko and Ehlich, Konrad (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 4370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J. (1999) ‘Language and politeness in early eighteenth century Britain’. Pragmatics 9.1 Special issue ‘Ideologies of Politeness’, ed. Kienpointer, Manfred, 520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J. (2000) ‘Mythical strands in the ideology of prescriptivism’. In Wright, Laura (ed.), The Development of Standard English 1300–1800: Theories, Descriptions, Conflicts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard. (2002) ‘From polite language to educated language: The re-emergence of an ideology’. In Watts, Richard and Trudgill, Peter (eds.), Alternative Histories of English. London and New York: Routledge, 155–72.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J. (2003) Politeness. Key Topics in Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J. (2005) ‘Linguistic politeness research: Quo vadis?’ In Watts, Richard J., Ide, Sachiko and Ehlich, Konrad (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in Its History, Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, xixlvii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J. (2011) ‘A socio-cognitive approach to historical politeness’. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12.1–2, 104–32.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J., Ide, Sachiko and Ehlich, Konrad. (1992) ‘Introduction’. In Watts, Richard J., Ide, Sachiko and Ehlich, Konrad (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in Its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. (2006) ‘Anglo scripts against “putting pressure” on other people and their linguistic manifestations’. In Goddard, Cliff (ed.), Ethnopragmatics: Understanding Discourse in Cultural Context. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 3164.Google Scholar
Wilcockson, Colin. (1980) ‘“Thou” and “ye” in Chaucer’s “Clerk’s Tale”’. The Use of English 31.3, 3743.Google Scholar
Young, Shirley. (2010) ‘Natural manners: Etiquette, ethics, and sincerity in American conduct manuals’. In Lambek, Michael (ed.), Ordinary Ethics: Anthropology, Language and Action. New York: Fordham University Press, 235–48.Google Scholar
Youths Behaviour, or Decency in Conversation amongst Men. (1663) London: W. Lee.Google Scholar