Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-8bbf57454-9wdfl Total loading time: 0.848 Render date: 2022-01-24T03:20:17.962Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

1 - Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2017

Edward J. Balleisen
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Lori S. Bennear
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Kimberly D. Krawiec
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Jonathan B. Wiener
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Policy Shock
Recalibrating Risk and Regulation after Oil Spills, Nuclear Accidents and Financial Crises
, pp. xvi - xviii
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, Mark. 1997. “The Perils of Mining Anthraref: Regulation, Technology and Safety, 1870–1945.” Pennsylvania History: A Journal of Mid-Atlantic Studies 64 (3): 361–83.Google Scholar
Alemanno, Alberto. 2011. The Challenges of Emergency Risk Regulation – Beyond the Volcanic Ash Crisis. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar. https://hal-hec.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00638652.Google Scholar
Bamberger, Kenneth A., and Guzman, Andrew T.. 2008. “Keeping Imports Safe: A Proposal for Discriminatory Regulation of International Trade.” California Law Review 96 (6): 1405–45.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D.. 2010. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Birkland, Thomas A. 1998. “Focusing Events, Mobilization, and Agenda Setting.” Journal of Public Policy 18 (01): 5374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkland, Thomas A. 2006. Lessons of Disaster: Policy Change After Catastrophic Events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdelais, Patrice. 2006. Epidemics Laid Low: A History of What Happened in Rich Countries. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Breyer, Stephen G. 1993. Breaking the Vicious Circle: Toward Effective Risk Regulation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burke, John G. 1966. “Bursting Boilers and the Federal Power.” Technology and Culture 7 (1): 123. doi:10.2307/3101598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Troy H., and Kay, Aaron C.. 2014. “Solution Aversion: On the Relation between Ideology and Motivated Disbelief.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 107 (5): 809–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpenter, Daniel P. 2001. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel, and Sin, Gisela. 2007. “Policy Tragedy and the Emergence of Regulation: The Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938.” Studies in American Political Development 21 (02): 149–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffee, John. 2012. “The Political Economy Of Dodd-Frank: Why Financial Reform Tends To Be Frustrated And Systemic Risk Perpetuated.” Cornell Law Review 97: 1019–82.Google Scholar
Coglianese, Cary, and Carrigan, Christoper. 2012. “Oversight in Hindsight: Assessing the U.S. Regulatory System in the Wake of Calamity.” In Regulatory Breakdown: The Crisis of Confidence in U.S. Regulation, edited by Coglianese, Cary. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 120.Google Scholar
Cohen, Dara Kay, Cuéllar, Mariano-Florentino, and Weingast, Barry R.. 2006. “Crisis Bureaucracy: Homeland Security and the Political Design of Legal Mandates.” Stanford Law Review 59 (3): 673759.Google Scholar
Dalkey, Norman Crolee, Brown, Bernice B, and Cochran, Samuel. 1969. The Delphi Method: An Experimental Study of Group Opinion. Vol. 3. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Daniel T., and Wilson, Timothy D.. 2007. “Prospection: Experiencing the Future.” Science 317 (5843): 1351–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gollier, Christian, and Weitzman, Martin L.. 2010. “How Should the Distant Future Be Discounted When Discount Rates Are Uncertain?Economics Letters 107 (3): 350–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, John D. 2007. “The Evolving Regulatory Role of the U.S. Office of Management and Budget.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 1 (2): 171–91. doi:10.1093/reep/rem013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Ron. 1994. “The Bubble Act: Its Passage and Its Effects on Business Organization.” The Journal of Economic History 54 (3): 610–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmer-Hirschberg, Olaf. 1967. “Analysis of the Future.” Product Page. www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P3558.html.
International Atomic Energy Agency. 2015. The Fukushima Daiichi Accident, Report of the Director. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency.
International Energy Agency. 2017. “OECD – Electricity and Heat Generation,” IEA Electricity Information Statistics (database). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/data-00457-enCrossRef
Jaffee, Dwight M., and Russell, Thomas. 1997. “Catastrophe Insurance, Capital Markets, and Uninsurable Risks.” Journal of Risk and Insurance, 64 (2): 205–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, George. 2015. “When Radiation Isn’t the Real Risk.” New York Times, September 22: D3.Google Scholar
Jones, Michael D., and McBeth, Mark K.. 2010. “A Narrative Policy Framework: Clear Enough to Be Wrong?Policy Studies Journal 38 (2): 329–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, Elena. 2001. “Presidential Administration.” Harvard Law Review 114 (8): 22452385. doi: 10.2307/1342513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Matthew E. 2007. “Environmental Disasters as Risk Regulation Catalysts? The Role of Bhopal, Chernobyl, Exxon Valdez, Love Canal, and Three Mile Island in Shaping U.S. Environmental Law.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 35: 1743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Andrew A., and Lenox, Michael J.. 2000. “Industry Self-Regulation without Sanctions: The Chemical Industry’s Responsible Care Program.” The Academy of Management Journal 43 (4): 698716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 2003. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: Longman Classics in Political Science.Google Scholar
Kousky, Carolyn, and Cooke, Roger. 2012. “Explaining the Failure to Insure Catastrophic Risks.” The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance – Issues and Practice 37 (2): 206–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuran, Timur, and Sunstein, Cass R.. 1999. “Availability Cascades and Risk Regulation.” Stanford Law Review, 51 (4): 683768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laibson, David. 1997. “Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112 (2): 443–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lelieveld, J., Evans, J. S., Fnais, M., Giannadaki, D., and Pozzer, A.. 2015. “The Contribution of Outdoor Air Pollution Sources to Premature Mortality on a Global Scale.” Nature 525 (7569): 367–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lenox, Michael J., and Nash, Jennifer. 2003. “Industry Self-regulation and Adverse Selection: A Comparison across Four Trade Association Programs.” Business Strategy and the Environment 12 (6): 343–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litfin, Karen T. 1994. Ozone Discourses. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, M. Granger, and Henrion, M.. 1990. Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, Richard G., and Pizer, William A.. 2003. “Discounting the Distant Future: How Much Do Uncertain Rates Increase Valuations?Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46 (1): 5271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Mark E. J. 2005. “Power Laws, Pareto Distributions and Zipf’s Law.” Contemporary Physics 46 (5): 323–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuclear Energy Institute. n.d.(a) “Japan Nuclear Updates.” www.nei.org/News-Media/News/Japan-Nuclear-Update.
Nuclear Energy Institute. n.d.(b) “World Nuclear Power Plants In Operation.” https://www.nei.org/Knowledge-Center/Nuclear-Statistics/World-Statistics/World-Nuclear-Power-Plants-in-Operation.
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 2003. Circular A-4. September 17. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/omb/circulars_a004_a-4/.
Percival, Robert V. 1998. “Environmental Legislation and the Problem of Collective Action.” Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum 9: 928.Google Scholar
Perrow, Charles. 1999. Normal Accidents. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Perrow, Charles. 2007. “Disasters Ever More? Reducing US Vulnerabilities.” In Handbook of Disaster Research, edited by Rodríguez, Havidán, Quarantelli, Enrico L., and Dynes, Russell R.. New York, NY: Springer, 521–33.Google Scholar
Pool, Heather. 2012. “The Politics of Mourning: The Triangle Fire and Political Belonging.” Polity 44 (2): 182211. doi:10.1057/pol.2011.23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, Donald. 1986. “Putting Social Reform into Practice: Labor Inspectors in France, 1892–1914.” Journal of Social History 20 (1): 6787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renn, Ortwin. 2008. Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World. London, UK: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Repetto, Robert, ed. 2006. Punctuated Equilibrium and the Dynamics of US Environmental Policy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rockness, Howard, and Rockness, Joanne. 2005. “Legislated Ethics: From Enron to Sarbanes-Oxley, the Impact on Corporate America.” Journal of Business Ethics 57 (1): 3154. doi:10.1007/s10551-004-3819-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romano, Roberta. 2005. “The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Making of Quack Corporate Governance.” Yale Law Journal 114: 15211611.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Charles E. 1987. The Cholera Years: The United States in 1832, 1849, and 1866. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabatier, Paul A. 1988. “An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein.” Policy Sciences 21 (2-3): 129–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabatier, Paul A., and Jenkins-Smith, Hank C.. 1993. Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Satterfield, Terre, Slovic, Paul, and Gregory, Robin. 2000. “Narrative Valuation in a Policy Judgment Context.” Ecological Economics 34 (3): 315–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneiberg, Marc, and Bartley, Tim. 2010. “Regulating or Redesigning Finance? Market Architectures, Normal Accidents, and Dilemmas of Regulatory Reform.” In Markets on Trial: The Economic Sociology of the Finance Crisis: Part A, edited by Lounsbury, Michael and Hirsch, Paul M.. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group, 281308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoenberg, Frederic Paik, Peng, Roger, and Woods, James. 2003. “On the Distribution of Wildfire Sizes.” Environmetrics 14 (6): 583–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seligman, Joel. 2004. Fundamentals of Securities Regulation. Frederick, MD: Aspen Publishers Online.Google Scholar
Shaw, Robert B. 1978. A History of Railroad Accidents, Safety Precautions, and Operating Practices, 2nd ed. Binghamton, NY: Vail-Ballou Press.Google Scholar
Slovic, Paul. 1987. “Perception of Risk.” Science 236 (4799): 280–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slovic, Paul. 2010. The Feeling of Risk: New Perspectives on Risk Perception. New York, NY: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Slovic, Paul, Flynn, James, and Kunreuther, Howard. 2013. Risk, Media and Stigma: Understanding Public Challenges to Modern Science and Technology. New York, NY: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Small, Deborah A., and Loewenstein, George. 2003. “Helping a Victim or Helping the Victim: Altruism and Identifiability.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 26 (1): 516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, Deborah A., Loewenstein, George, and Slovic, Paul. 2007. “Sympathy and Callousness: The Impact of Deliberative Thought on Donations to Identifiable and Statistical Victims.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 102: 143–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallman, Ellis W., and Moen, Jon R.. 1990. “Lessons from the Panic of 1907.” Economic Review – Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta 75 (3): 213.Google Scholar
The International Review (1874–1883). 1877. “The Life Insurance Question: What Is Wrong in Life Insurance?,” May.
United Nations Scientific Committee. 2013. Report of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. New York, NY: United Nations.PubMed
Venkatesan, Rashmi. 2013. “Clothing Garment Workers in Safety: The Case of Bangladesh.” Economic and Political Weekly. www.epw.in/web-exclusives/clothing-garment-workers-safety-case-bangladesh.html.
Weber, Elke U. 2006. “Experience-Based and Description-Based Perceptions of Long-Term Risk: Why Global Warming Does Not Scare Us (Yet).” Climatic Change 77 (1–2): 103–20. doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9060-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzman, Martin L. 2009. “On Modeling and Interpreting the Economics of Catastrophic Climate Change.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 91 (1): 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzman, Martin L. 2011. “Fat-Tailed Uncertainty in the Economics of Catastrophic Climate Change.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 5 (2): 275–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, Jonathan B. 2006. “Better Regulation in Europe.” Current Legal Problems 59 (January): 447518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, Jonathan B. 2013. “The Diffusion of Regulatory Oversight.” In The Globalization of Cost-Benefit Analysis in Environmental Policy, edited by Livermore, Michael A. and Revesz, Richard L.. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 123–41.Google Scholar
Wiener, Jonathan B. 2016. “The Tragedy of the Uncommons: On the Politics of Apocalypse.” Global Policy 7: 6780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, Jonathan B., and Ribeiro, Daniel. 2016. “Impact Assessment: Diffusion and Integration.” In Comparative Law and Regulation, edited by Bignami, Francesca and Zaring, David. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 159–89.Google Scholar
Wiener, Jonathan B., Rogers, Michael D., Hammitt, James K., and Sand, Peter H., eds. 2011. The Reality of Precaution: Comparing Risk Regulation in the United States and Europe. Washington, DC: RFF Press.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. 2013. Health Risk Assessment from the Nuclear Accident after the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami, Based on a Preliminary Dose Estimation. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
World Ocean Review (WOR) 3. 2014. “Marine Resources—Opportunities and Risks.” Hamburg, Germany: Maribus. http://worldoceanreview.com/wp-content/downloads/wor3/WOR3_english.pdf.
Wuthnow, Robert. 2010. Be Very Afraid: The Cultural Response to Terror, Pandemics, Environmental Devastation, Nuclear Annihilation, and Other Threats. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×