Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5959bf8d4d-bmjgf Total loading time: 1.373 Render date: 2022-12-08T21:03:52.453Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2009

Antonia LoLordo
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

British Library MS Harley 1677 [portions of the work known as De vita et doctrina Epicuri], 1634. British Library, London.
De vita et moribus Epicuri libri octo. Lyon: Guillaume Barbier, 1647.
Animadversiones in decimum librum Diogenis Laertii, qui est de vita, moribus, placitisque Epicuri. Lyon: Guillaume Barbier, 1649.
Receuil de lettres des sieurs Morin, de la Roche, de Neure et Gassend: en suite l'apologie du Sieur Gassend touchant la question De motu impresso a motore translato.Paris: Augustin Courbé, 1650.
Institutio astronomica, juxta hypotheseis tam veterum, quam Copernici et Tychonis, dictata a Petro Gassendo regio matheseos professore. London: Jacob Flesher, 1653.
The Mirrour of True Nobility & Gentility. Being the life of the renowned Nicolaus Claudius Fabricius Lord of Peiresk, Senator of the Parliament at Aix. Written by the learned Petrus Gassendus, professor of the mathematicks to the King of France. Englished by W. Rand, Doctor of Physick. London: J. Streater for Humphrey Moseley, 1657.
Petri Gassendi Opera Omnia in sex tomos divisa. 6 volumes. Lyon: Laurent Anisson and Jean-Baptiste Devenet, 1658. Reprinted in facsimile with an introduction by Tullio Gregory. Stuttgart-Bad Canstatt: Friedrich Frohmann, 1964.
The Vanity of Judiciary Astrology, or, Divination by the stars. Lately written in Latin, by that great schollar and mathematician, the illustrious Petrus Gassendus, mathematical professor to the king of France. Translated into English by a person of quality. London: Humphrey Moseley, 1659.
Institutio logica, et Philosophiae Epicuri Syntagma. Authore V. Cl. Petro Gassendi.London: John Redmayne, 1668.
A Discourse on the Antiquity, Progress, and Augmentation of Astronomy. London: William Hawes, 1699.
Lettres familières à François Luillier pendant l'hiver 1632–1633. Edited by Bernard, Rochot. Paris: J. Vrin, 1944.Google Scholar
Dissertations en forme de paradoxes contre les Aristotéliciens (Exercitationes paradoxicae adversus Aristoteleos) Livres I et II. Edited and translated by Bernard Rochot. Paris: J. Vrin, 1959.
Disquisitio metaphysica; seu, Dubitationes et instantiae adversus Renati Cartesii Metaphysicam et responsa. Recherches métaphysiques; ou, Doutes et instances contre la Métaphysique de R. Descartes et ses réponses. Edited and translated by Bernard Rochot. Paris: J. Vrin, 1962.
The Selected Works of Pierre Gassendi. Edited and translated by Craig G. Brush. New York: Johnson Reprint, 1972.
Pierre Gassendi's Institutio Logica (1658). Edited and translated by Howard Jones. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1981.
Vie et Moeurs d'Epicure. 2 volumes. Translated by Sylvie Taussig. Paris: Editions Alive, 2001.
Pierre Gassendi (1592–1655): Lettres latines. 2 volumes. Translated by Sylvie Taussig. Turnhout: Brepols, 2004.
Aquinas, Thomas. The Summa Contra Gentiles of Saint Thomas Aquinas. London: Burns Oates and Washbourne, 1923.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa theologiae. London: Blackfriars, 1964.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. A Commentary on Aristotle's De Anima. Translated by Robert Pasnau. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Aristotle. The Complete Works of Aristotle. 2 volumes. Edited by Jonathan Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.
Arnauld, Antoine. On True and False Ideas. Translated by Elmar J. Kremer. Lewiston, NY: Lampeter, 1990.
Arnauld, Antoine, and Nicole, Pierre. Logic, or, The Art of Thinking. Translated by Jill Vance Buroker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augustine. Against the Academicians; The Teacher. [ContraAcademicos.] Translated by Peter King. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1995.
Bacon, Francis. The Advancement of Learning. Edited by Arthur, Johnston. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Baillet, Adrien. La vie de Monsieur Des-Cartes. 2 volumes. Paris: Daniel Horthemels, 1964.Google Scholar
Basso, Sebastien. Philosophia naturalis adversus Aristotelem, in quibus abstrusa veterum Physiologia restauratur, & Aristotelis errores solidis rationibus refelluntur. Geneva: Pierre de la Rouiere, 1621.
Bayle, Pierre. Dictionnaire historique et critique. 3rd edition. Rotterdam: Michel Böhm, 1720.
Bayle, Pierre. Historical and Critical Dictionary. Translated by Richard Popkin. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1991.
Beeckman, Isaac. Journal tenu par Isaac Beeckman de 1604–1634. Edited by Cornelius, Waard. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1939–53.Google Scholar
Berkeley George. Works of George Berkeley. Edited by Luce, A A and Jessop, T E. 9 volumes. London: Nelson, 1948–57.Google Scholar
Bernier, François. Abrégé de la philosophie de M. Gassendi. 8 volumes. Lyon: Anisson, Posuel & Rigaud, 1678. Reprint edition, edited by Sylvia, Murr and Geneviève, Stefani. Paris: Fayard, 1992.Google Scholar
Bernier, François. Three Discourses of Happiness, Virtue, and Liberty, collected from the works of the Learn'd Gassendi. London: Awnshawm & John Churchill, 1699.Google Scholar
Bougerel, Joseph. Vie de Pierre Gassendi, prévôt de l'église de Digne & professeur de mathématiques au Collège Royal. Paris: Jacques Vincent, 1737. Reprint, Geneva: Slatkine Reprints, 1970.
Burgersdijck, Franco. Idea philosophiae tum moralis, tum naturalis. Sive, Epitome compendiosa utriusque ex Aristotele excerpta, & methodice disposita. Oxford: Joseph Godwin and Richard Davis, 1667.
Burgersdijck, Franco. Franconis Burgersdici Institionum metaphysicarum lib. ii.London: J. Creek and J. Baker, 1653.Google Scholar
Campanella, Tommaso. De Sensu Rerum et Magia, Libri Quatuor. Frankfurt: Godefrid Tampachius, 1620.Google Scholar
Campanella, Tommaso. A Defence of Galileo the Mathematician from Florence. Edited and translated by Richard J. Blackwell. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Charleton, Walter. The Darkness of Atheism dispelled by the Light of Nature: A physico-theologicall treatise. London: J. F. for William Lee, 1652.Google Scholar
Charleton, Walter.Physiologia Epicuro–Gassendo–Charletoniana: or, A fabrick of science natural, upon the hypothesis of atoms, founded by Epicurus, repaired by Petrus Gassendus, augmented by Walter Charleton, Dr. in medicine, and physician to the late Charles, Monarch of Great-Britain. London: Tho. Newcomb for Thomas Heath, 1654.
Charleton, Walter.Epicurus's morals, collected partly out of his owne Greek text, in Diogenes Laertius, and partly out of the rhapsodies of Marcus Antoninus, Plutarch, Cicero, & Seneca. And faithfully Englished. London: William Wilson for Henry Herringman, 1656.
Charleton, Walter. The immortality of the human soul, demonstrated by the light of nature. In two dialogues.London: William Wilson for Henry Herringman, 1657.Google Scholar
Cicero, Marcus Tullius. De natura deorum. Academica. Translated by H. Rackham. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1940.Google Scholar
Clave, Étienne de. Nouvelle lumière philosophique des vrais principes et élémens de nature, & qualité d'iceux. Edited by Bernard, Joly. Paris: Fayard, 2000.Google Scholar
Clave, Étienne. Le cours de chimie, second liure des principes de nature. Paris: Olivier de Varennes, 1646.Google Scholar
Colegio, das Artes (Coimbra, Portugal). Commentarii Colegii Conimbricensis Societatis Iesu, in octo libros Physicorum Aristotelis Stagiritae. London: Horatio Cardon, 1602.Google Scholar
Artes, Colegio dasCommentarii Collegii Conimbricensis Societatis Iesu, in tres libros De anima Aristotelis Stagiritae.Cologne: Lazarus Zetner, 1617.Google Scholar
Cudworth, Ralph. The True Intellectual System of the Universe: The first part, wherein, all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted; and its impossibility demonstrated. London: Richard Royston, 1678.Google Scholar
Daniel, Gabriel. Voiage du monde de Descartes. Paris: Veuve de S. Benard, 1691.Google Scholar
Daniel, Gabriel. A voyage to the world of Cartesius. London: Thomas Bennet, 1692.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. 3 volumes. Translated by John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, Dugald Murdoch, and (3rd volume only) Anthony Kenny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984–91.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. Oeuvres de Descartes. 11 volumes. Edited by Charles Adam and Paul Tannery. Paris: J. Vrin, 1996.Google Scholar
Diogenes Laertius. Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Edited by R. D. Hicks. Loeb Classical Library. London: Heinemann, W, 1925.Google Scholar
Digby, Kenelm. Two treatises, in the one of which, the Nature of Bodies, in the other, the Nature of Mans Soule, is looked into, in way of discovery, of the immortality of reasonable soules. Paris: Gilles Blaizot, 1644.
Du Moulin, Pierre. La philosophie, mise en français, et divisée entre trois parties, sçavoir, elements de la logique, la physique ou science naturalle, l'ethyque ou science morale. Paris: Thomas Blaise and Olivier de Varenne, 1644.
Dupleix, Scipion. La Métaphysique. Edited by Roger, Ariew. Paris: Fayard, 1992.Google Scholar
Dupleix, Scipion. La Physique. Edited by Roger Ariew. Paris: Fayard, 1992.Google Scholar
Epicurus. Epicurus, the Extant Remains. Edited and translated by Cyril Bailey. Hildesheim: G. Olms, 1974.
Epicurus, . The Epicurus Reader: Selected Testimonia and Writings. Translated and edited by Brad Inwood and Lloyd Gerson. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1994.Google Scholar
Eustachius a Sancto Paolo. Summa philosophiae quadripartita: de rebus dialecticis, moralibus, physicis, & metaphysicis.Paris: Pierre Bilaine, 1620.
Fabricius, Hieronymus. The embryological treatises of Hieronymus Fabricius of Aquapendente: The formation of the egg and of the chick (De formatione ovi et pulli), The formed fetus (De formato fetus). Edited and translated by Howard B. Adelmann. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1942.Google Scholar
Fernel, Jean. The Physiologia of Jean Fernel (1567). Edited and translated by J. M. Forrester. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 2003.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio. Platonic Theology. Edited and translated by Michael J. B. Allen with John Warden. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Fleury, Marie-Antoinette, and Bailhache, Georges (editors). “Documents inédits sur Gassendi.” In Pierre Gassendi, 1592–1655. Edited by Bernard, Rochot. Paris: Editions Albin Michel, 1955.Google Scholar
Fludd, Robert. Utriusque cosmi maioris scilicet et minoris metaphysica, physica atque technica historia. Oppenheim: Johan-Theodor de Bry, 1617.
Fludd, Robert.Sophia cum moria certamen, in quo lapis Lydius a falso structore, fr. Marino Mersenno reprobatus, celeberrima voluminis sui Babylonici, in Genesim, figmenta accurate examinat. Frankfurt: Joachim Frizius, 1629.
Fludd, Robert.Doctor Fludds answer unto m. Foster, or, The squeesing of parson Fosters sponge, ordained by him for the wiping away of the weapon-salve. London: N. Butter, 1631.
Fludd, Robert.Clavis philosophiae et alchymiae Fluddanae, sive, Roberti Fluddi. Ad epistolicam Petri Gassendi Theologi exercitationem responsum. Frankfurt: William Fitzerum, 1633.
Fludd, Robert. Philosophia Moysaica. Gouda: Peter Rammazenius, 1638.Google Scholar
Fludd, Robert. Mosaicall philosophy: grounded upon the essential truth or eternal sapience. London: Humphrey Moseley, 1659.Google Scholar
Fludd, Robert.Robert Fludd and his Philosophicall Key. Edited by Allen, Debus. New York: Science History Publications, 1979.Google Scholar
Foster, William. Hoplocrisma-spongus, or, A sponge to wipe away the weapon-salve. London: Thomas Cotes for John Grove, 1631.Google Scholar
Galen. Selected Works. Edited and translated by Singer, P. N.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Galen.On the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato. Edited and translated by Phillip de Lacy. 2 volumes. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1980.
Galilei, Galileo. Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo. Translated by Stillman Drake. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor, 1957.Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo. Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo. Two New Sciences: Including Centers of Gravity and Force of Percussion. Translated by Stillman Drake. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Gilbert, William. De Magnete, Magnetisque Corporibus, et de magno magnete tellure. London: Peter Short, 1600.Google Scholar
Goclenius, Rudolf. Lexicon philosophicum: quo tanquam clave philosophiae fores aperiuntur. Frankfurt: 1613. Reprinted Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1964.Google Scholar
Harvey, William. Anatomical Exercitations, concerning the generation of living creatures. London: 1653.Google Scholar
Harvey, William. Disputations Touching the Generation of Animals. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 1981.Google Scholar
Hill, Nicholas. Philosophia Epicurea, Democriteana, Theophrastica proposita simpliciter, non edocta. Paris: R. Thierry, 1601.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Elementorum Philosophiae Sectio Prima De Corpore. London: Andreas Crook, 1655.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Opera philosophica quae latine scripsit. 5 volumes. Edited by William, Molesworth. London: Bohn, 1839–45.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Thomas White's De Mundo Examined. London: Bradford University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. The Correspondence. 2 volumes. Edited by Noel, Malcolm. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horace, . Satires, Epistles and Ars Poetica. Translated by H. Rushton Fairclough. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1926.Google Scholar
Hume, David. Enquiries concerning Human Understanding and concerning the Principles of Morals. Edited by Selby-Bigge, L. A., 3rd edition revised by P. H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature. Edited by Selby-Bigge, L A, 2nd edition revised by Nidditch, P H. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Huygens, Christian. Oeuvres complètes par la Societé Hollandaise des sciences. 22 volumes. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1888–1950.Google Scholar
Keckermann, Bartholomew. Systema Compendiosum Totius Mathematices, hoc est Geometriae, Optice, Astronomiae, et Geographiae. Oxford: William Hall for Francis Oxlad, 1651.Google Scholar
Poterie, Antoine. “Memoires Touchant la Naissance, Vie et Moeurs de Gassendi.” Edited by Philippe Tamizey de Larroque. Revue des Questions Historique 22 (1877), 211–40.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W.Philosophical Papers and Letters. Edited and translated by Leroy Loemker. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W.Die philosophischen Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. 7 volumes. Edited by Gerhardt, C I. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1960–1.Google Scholar
Lipsius, Justus. J. L. Manuductionis ad Stoicam philosophiam libri tres. Paris: Hadrian Perier, 1604.Google Scholar
Lipsius, Justus. J. Lipsii Physiologiae Stoicorum Libri Tres. Paris: Hadrian Perier, 1604.Google Scholar
Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by PeterH. Nidditch, . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Locke, John.Drafts for the ‘Essay Concerning Human Understanding’ and Other Philosophical Writings. Edited by Nidditch, P H and Rogers, G A J. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Lucretius Carus, Titus. De rerum natura. Edited by Cyril, Bailey. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1947.
Malebranche, Nicolas. Oeuvres complètes. 20 volumes. Edited by André, Robinet. Paris: J. Vrin, 1958–84.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. The Holy Family. Translated by R. Divson. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1956.Google Scholar
Mersenne, Marin. La vérité des sciences contre les sceptiques ou pyrrhoniens. Paris: 1625. Facsimile reprint, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Friedrich Frommann, 1969.Google Scholar
Mersenne, Marin. Correspondance du P. Marin Mersenne. 15 volumes. Edited by Cornelius de Waard and Armand Beaulieu. Paris: CNRS, 1933–83.Google Scholar
Molina, Luis de. Liberi Arbitrii cum Gratiae Donis, Divina Praescientia, Providentia, Praedestinatione et Reprobatione Concordia. Edited by J. Rabeneck. Ona: Collegium maximum Societatis Iesu, 1953.
More, Henry. Henry More's Manual of Metaphysics: A translation of the Enchiridion Metaphysicum (1679). Translated by Alexander Jacob. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1995.
Moxon, Joseph. A Tutor to Astronomy and Geography, Or, an Easie and Speedy Way to Know the Use of Both of the Globes, Coelestial and Terrestrial. London: Phillip Lea, 1699.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac. Unpublished Scientific Papers of Isaac Newton. Edited by Rupert, Hall and Marie Boas, Hall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac.Certain Philosophical Questions: Newton's Trinity Notebook. Edited by McGuire, J E and Martin, Tamny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac.Philosophical Writings. Edited by Andrew, Janiak. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Pascal, Blaise. The Physical Treatises of Pascal: The Equilibrium of Liquids and the Weight of the Mass of the Air. Translated by A. G. H. Spiers. New York: Columbia University Press, 1937.Google Scholar
Pascal, Blaise.Oeuvres complètes. 4 volumes. Edited by Jean, Mesnard. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1964–92.Google Scholar
Patrizi, Francesco. Discussionum peripateticarum tomi IV, quibus Aristotelicae philosophiae universa historia atque dogmata nunc veterum placitis collata, eleganter et erudite declarantur. Basel: ad Pernam Lecythum, 1581.
Patrizi, Francesco. Nova de Universis Philosophia. Ferrara: Benedict Mammarelli, 1591.Google Scholar
Peiresc, Nicolas-Claude Fabri. Lettres de Peiresc. 7 volumes. Edited by Philippe Tamizey de Larroque. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale, 1893.Google Scholar
Pemble, William. De Origine Formarum. Cambridge: Roger Daniel for John Bartlett, 1650.Google Scholar
Philodemus, . Philodemus: On Methods of Inference. Edited and translated by Phillip de Lacey and Estelle de Lacey. Naples: Bibliopolis, 1978.Google Scholar
Raphson, Joseph. De Spatio Reali seu Ente Infinito. London: John Taylor, 1697.Google Scholar
Sanderson, Robert. Logicae Artis Compendium. 2nd edition. Oxford: John Lichfield and Jacob Short, 1618.Google Scholar
Sennert, Daniel. Epitome Naturalis Scientiae. Oxford: SJohn Lichfield and Henry Cripps, 1632.Google Scholar
Sennert, Daniel. Hypomnemata Physica. Frankfurt: Clement Schleich, 1636.Google Scholar
Severinus, Petrus. Idea Medicinae Philosophicae. Basel: Henricpetrus, 1571.Google Scholar
Empiricus, Sextus. Adversus Mathematicos. Loeb Classical Library. 4 volumes. Edited and translated by R. G. Bury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Empiricus, Sextus. Outlines of Scepticism. Translated by Julia Annas and Jonathan Barnes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Stanley, Thomas. The History of Philosophy: Containing the Lives, Opinions, Actions and Discourses of the Philosophers of Every Sect. 3 volumes. London: Thomas Bassett, 1687.Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco. Disputationes metaphysicae. 2 volumes. Reprint Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1965.
Suárez, Francisco. On Efficient Causality: Metaphysical Disputations 17, 18 and 19. Translated by A. J. Freddosso. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco. On the Formal Cause of Substance: Metaphysical Disputation XV. Translated by John Kronen. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco. On Creation, Conservation, and Concurrence: Metaphysical Disputations 20, 21, and 22. Translated by A. J. Freddosso. South Bend, IN: St. Augustine's Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Telesio, Bernardino. De rerum natura iuxta propria principia. Naples: I. Cacchius, 1570.Google Scholar
Toletus, Francisco. Commentaria una cum Quaestionibus in Octo Libros Aristotelis de Physica auscultatione. Item in Lib. Arist. De Generatione et Corruptione. Rome: I. Martinelli, 1590.Google Scholar
Van Helmont, Jean-Baptiste. Ortus medicinae. Id est, initia physicae inaudita. Progressus medicinae novus, in morborum ultionem, ad vitam longam. Amsterdam: Ludovic Elzevier, 1648.
Adelmann, Howard B.Marcello Malpighi and the Evolution of Embryology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Alexander, Peter. Ideas, Qualities and Corpuscles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Algra, Keimpe, Barnes, Jonathan, Mansfeld, Jaap, and Schofield, Malcolm (editors). The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, James. Inference from Signs: Ancient Debates about the Nature of Evidence.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Annas, Julia. “Epicurus' Philosophy of Mind.” In Companions to Ancient Thought II: Psychology. Edited by Stephen, Everson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Annas, Julia. Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind.Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Annas, Julia, and Barnes, Jonathan. The Modes of Scepticism: Ancient Texts and Modern Interpretations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
Ariew, Roger. “Damned If You Do: Cartesians and Censorship, 1663–1706.” Perspectives on Science (1994), 255–74.Google Scholar
Ariew, Roger. Descartes and the Last Scholastics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Ariew, Roger, and Grene, Marjorie. Descartes and His Contemporaries: Meditations, Objections and Replies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Armogathe, Jean-Robert. “L'Enseignement de Pierre Gassendi au Collège Royal d'Aix-en-Provence et la Traditions Philosophique des Grands Carmes.” In Gassendi et l'Europe, 1592–1792: actes du colloque international de Paris. Edited by Sylvia Murr. Paris: J. Vrin, 1997.Google Scholar
Armogathe, Jean-Robert. “Proofs of the Existence of God.” In The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Edited by Daniel Garber and Michael Ayers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. J.Language and Logic in the Post-Medieval Period. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E. J.Studies in Post-Medieval Semantics. London: Variorum Reprints, 1985.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. J.“Traditional Logic.” In The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy. Edited by C. B. Schmitt and Quentin Skinner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Asmis, Elizabeth. Epicurus' Scientific Method. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Ayers, Michael. Locke: Epistemology and Ontology. New York: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
Ayers, Michael. “Ideas and Objective Being.” In The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Edited by Daniel Garber and Michael Ayers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Ayers, Michael. “Theories of Knowledge and Belief.” In The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Edited by Daniel Garber and Michael Ayers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Barber, Kenneth, and Gracia, Jorge. Individuation and Identity in Early Modern Philosophy: Descartes to Kant.Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F. J.Galileo's French Correspondents.” Annals of Science 45 (1988): 169–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaulieu, Armand. “Les Réactions des Savants Français au Debut du XVII Siècle devant l'Héliocentrisme de Galilée.” In Novità celesti e crisi del sapere. Edited by Paolo Galluzzi. Florence: Giunta Barbera, 1984.Google Scholar
Berr, Henri. Du scepticisme de Gassendi. Translated by Bernard Rochot. Paris: Albin Michel, 1960.Google Scholar
Blackwell, Constance, and Kusukawa, S. (editors). Philosophy in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries: Conversations with Aristotle. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate, 1999.Google Scholar
Blackwell, Richard J.Galileo, Bellarmine, and the Bible. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Bloch, Olivier. La philosophie de Gassendi: nominalisme, matérialisme, et métaphysique. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1971.Google Scholar
Bloch, Olivier. “Gassendi and the Transition from the Middle Ages to the Classical Era.” Yale French Studies 49 (1973), 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Reinhard. “Historical Observations on the Genesis of the Three-Dimensional Optical Picture (Gassendi, Locke, Berkeley)”. Ratio 17.1 (1975), 176–90.Google Scholar
Brett, G. S.The Philosophy of Gassendi. London: Macmillan, 1908.Google Scholar
Brockliss, L. W. B.French Higher Education in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries: A Cultural History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Brockliss, L. W. B.Descartes, Gassendi, and the Reception of the Mechanical Philosophy in the French Collèges de Plein Exercise, 1640–1730.” Perspectives on Science 3.4 (1995), 450–79.Google Scholar
Brundell, Barry. Pierre Gassendi: From Aristotelianism to a New Natural Philosophy. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, Miles. “Idealism and Greek Philosophy: What Descartes Saw and Berkeley Missed.” The Philosophical Review 91 (1982), 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centre International d'Études Gassendiennes. Catalogue: Pierre Gassendi. Digne-les-Bains: Centre International d'Études Gassendiennes, 1992.
Chappell, Vere. Essays on Early Modern Philosophers: Grotius to Gassendi. New York: Garland, 1992.Google Scholar
Clark, J. T.Pierre Gassendi and the Physics of Galileo.” Isis 54 (1963), 351–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Desmond. Occult Powers and Hypotheses: Cartesian Natural Philosophy under Louis XIV. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Clatterbaugh, Kenneth. The Causation Debate in Early Modern Philosophy, 1637–1739. New York: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar
Clericuzio, Antonio. Elements, Principles and Corpuscles: A Study of Atomism and Chemistry in the Seventeenth Century. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clericuzio, Antonio. “Gassendi, Charleton and Boyle on Matter and Motion.” In Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theories. Edited by Christoph Lüthy, John Murdoch, and William Newman. Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar
Clucas, Stephen. “The Atomism of the Cavendish Circle: A Reappraisal.” The Seventeenth Century 9.2 (1994), 247–68.Google Scholar
Clucas, Stephen. “The Infinite Variety of Formes and Magnitudes: 16th and 17th Century English Corpuscular Philosophy and Aristotelian Theories of Matter and Form.” Early Science and Medicine 2.3 (1997), 257–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clucas, Stephen. “Corpuscular Matter Theory in the Northumberland Circle.” In Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theories. Edited by Christoph Lüthy, John Murdoch, and William Newman. Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar
Crocker, Robert. Henry More, 1614–1687: A Biography of the Cambridge Platonist. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, Andrew. “The Identity of Natural Philosophy: A Response to Edward Grant.” Early Science and Medicine 5.3 (2000), 259–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darmon, Jean-Claude. “Gassendi et la ‘rhetorique’ de Descartes.” Papers on French Seventeenth Century Literature 25.49 (1998), 401–29.Google Scholar
Darmon, Jean-Claude. Philosophie épicurienne et littérature au XVIIe siècle en France.Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1998.Google Scholar
Dear, Peter. Mersenne and the Learning of the Schools. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Dear, Peter. Discipline and Experience. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dear, Peter. “Method and the Study of Nature.” In The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Edited by Daniel Garber and Michael Ayers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Debus, Allen. The French Paracelsans: The Chemical Challenge to Medical and Scientific Tradition in Early Modern France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Des Chene, Dennis. Physiologia: Natural Philosophy in Late Aristotelian and Cartesian Thought. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Des Chene, Dennis. Life's Forms. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Des Chene, Dennis. Spirits and Clocks: Machine and Organism in Descartes.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Duchesneau, François. Les modèles du vivant de Descartes à Leibniz.Paris: J. Vrin, 1998.Google Scholar
Dutton, Blake. “Physics and Metaphysics in Descartes and Galileo.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 37.1 (1999), 49–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easton, Patricia (editor). Logic and the Workings of the Mind: The Logic of Ideas and Faculty Psychology in Early Modern Philosophy. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, 1997.Google Scholar
Egan, Howard. Gassendi's View of Knowledge: A Study of the Epistemological Basis of His Knowledge. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1984.Google Scholar
Emerton, Norma E.The Scientific Reinterpretation of Form. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Everson, Stephen. “Epicurus on the Truth of the Senses.” In Companions to Ancient Thought I: Epistemology. Edited by Stephen Everson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Everson, Stephen. “Epicurus on Mind and Language.” In Companions to Ancient Thought III: Language. Edited by Stephen Everson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Findlen, Paula (editor). Athanasius Kircher: The Last Man who Knew Everything. New York: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar
Fine, Gail. “Descartes and Ancient Skepticism: Reheated Cabbage?The Philosophical Review 109.2 (2000), 195–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Saul. “Science and Skepticism in the 17th Century: The Atomism and Scientific Method of Pierre Gassendi.” PhD dissertation, CUNY, 1997.
Fisher, Saul. “Gassendi's Atomist Account of Generation and Heredity in Plants and Animals.” Perspectives on Science 11.4 (2003), 484–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floridi, Luciano. Sextus Empiricus: The Transmission and Recovery of Pyrrhonism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Fouke, Daniel C.‘Mechanical’ and ‘Organical’ Models in 17th Century Models of Biological Reproduction.” Science in Context 3.2 (1989), 366–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fouke, Daniel C.“Pascal's Physics.” In The Cambridge Companion to Pascal. Edited by Nicholas Hammond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Fowler, D., and Fowler, P. G.. Lucretius on Atomic Motion: A Commentary on De Rerum Natura. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Frank, Robert G.Harvey and the Oxford Physiologists. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Freddoso, Alfred J.God's General Concurrence with Secondary Causes: Why Conservation Is Not Enough.” Philosophical Perspectives 5 (1991), 553–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freddoso, Alfred J.God's General Concurrence with Secondary Causes: Pitfalls and Prospects.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 67 (1994), 131–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, R K. William Harvey's Natural Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freudenthal, Gad. “Stoic Concepts in Mechanical Philosophy: The Problem of Electrical Attraction.” In Renaissance and Revolution: Humanists, Scholars, Craftsmen and Natural Philosophers in Early Modern Europe. Edited by J. V. Field and James Frank. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Fuchs, T., and Grene, M. G.. The Mechanization of the Heart: Harvey and Descartes. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Furley, David J. “Aristotle and the Atomists on Motion in a Void.” In Motion and Time, Space and Matter. Edited by Peter K. Machamer and R. G. Turnbull. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan. “New Doctrines of Motion.” In The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Edited by Daniel Garber and Michael Ayers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan, and Roger Ariew. “Body: The Scholastic Background.” In The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Edited by Daniel Garber and Michael Ayers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Galluzzi, Paolo. “Gassendi and l'Affaire Galilée of the Laws of Motion.” Science in Context 13.3–4 (2000), 509–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garber, Daniel. “Semel in Vita.” In Essays on Descartes' Meditations. Edited by Amelie Rorty. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel. Descartes' Metaphysical Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel. “Descartes and Occasionalism.” In Causation in Early Modern Philosophy. Edited by Steven Nadler. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Gatti, Hillary. “Giordano Bruno's Soul-Powered Atoms.” In Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theories. Edited by Christoph Lüthy, John Murdoch, and William Newman. Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen. Descartes: An Intellectual Biography. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen. Francis Bacon and the Transformation of Early Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen. Descartes' System of Natural Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glidden, David. “Hellenistic Background for Gassendi's Theory of Ideas.” Journal of the History of Ideas 49 (1988), 405–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glidden, David. “Parrots, Pyrrhonists and Native Speakers.” In Companions to Ancient Thought III: Language. Edited by Stephen Everson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Gorman, M. J.A Matter of Faith? Christoph Scheiner, Jesuit Censorship, and the Trial of Galileo.” Perspectives in Science 4.3 (1996), 283–320.Google Scholar
Grant, Edward. “The Condemnation of 1277, God's Absolute Power, and Physical Thought in the Late Middle Ages.” Viator: Medieval and Renaissance Studies 10 (1979), 211–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, Edward. Much Ado About Nothing: Theories of Space and the Vacuum from the Middle Ages to the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, Edward. “The Condemnation of 1277.” In The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Edited by Norman Kretzman, Anthony Kenny, and Jan Pinborg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Grant, Edward. “God and Natural Philosophy: The Late Middle Ages and Sir Isaac Newton.” Early Science and Medicine 5.3 (2000), 279–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, Tullio. “Libertinisme Érudit in Seventeenth-Century France and Italy: The Critique of Ethics and Religion.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 6.3 (1998), 323–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grene, Marjorie. Descartes. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Guerlac, Henri. “Can There Be Colors in the Dark?Journal of the History of Ideas 47.1 (1986), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, A. Rupert. Henry More: Magic, Religion and Experiment. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1990.Google Scholar
Hatfield, Gary. “Force (God) in Descartes' Physics.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 10 (1979), 113–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatfield, Gary. “The Senses and the Fleshless Eye: The Meditations as Cognitive Exercises.” In Essays on Descartes' Meditations. Edited by Amelie Rorty. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Hatfield, Gary. “The Workings of the Intellect: Mind and Psychology.” In Logic and the Workings of the Mind: The Logic of Ideas and Faculty Psychology in Early Modern Philosophy. Edited by Patricia Easton. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, 1997.Google Scholar
Hatfield, Gary. “The Cognitive Faculties.” In The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Edited by Daniel Garber and Michael Ayers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Headley, John M.Tommaso Campanella and the Transformation of the World.Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Henry, John. “Occult Qualities and the Experimental Philosophy: Active Principles in Pre-Newtonian Matter Theory.” History of Science 24 (1986), 335–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, John. “Void Space, Mathematical Realism and Francesco Patrizi da Cherso's Use of Atomistic Arguments.” In Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theories. Edited by Christoph Lüthy, John Murdoch, and William R. Newman. Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar
Hervey, Helen. “Hobbes and Descartes in the Light of some Unpublished Letters of the Correspondence between Sir Charles Cavendish and Dr. John Pell”. Osiris 10 (1952), 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirai, Hiro. “Concepts of Seeds and Nature in the Work of Marsilio Ficino.” In Marsilio Ficino: His Theology, His Philosophy, His Legacy. Edited by Michael J. B. Allen and Valery Rees. Leiden: Brill, 2002.Google Scholar
Holden, Thomas. The Architecture of Matter: Galileo to Kant. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffman, William H.Robert Fludd and the End of the Renaissance. London: Routledge, 1988.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Keith. “What Happened to Occult Qualities in the Scientific Revolution?Isis 73 (1982), 233–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Susan. “Certain and Less Certain Knowledge.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 87 (1987), 227–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Susan. Passion and Action: The Emotions in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Jardine, Nicolas. The Birth of History and Philosophy of Science: Kepler's A Defence of Tycho against Ursus; with Essays on Its Provenance and Significance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Jones, Howard. Pierre Gassendi, 1592–1655: An Intellectual Biography. Nieuwkoop: B. De Graaf, 1981.Google Scholar
Jones, Howard. The Epicurean Tradition. London: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
Jones, Howard. “Gassendi and Locke on Ideas.” In Essays on Early Modern Philosophers: Grotius to Gassendi. Edited by V. C. Chappell. New York: Garland, 1992.Google Scholar
Joy, Lynn Sumida. Gassendi the Atomist: Advocate of History in an Age of Science.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Joy, Lynn Sumida. “The Conflict of Mechanisms and Its Empiricist Outcome.” Monist 71 (1988), 498–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joy, Lynn Sumida. “Epicureanism in Renaissance Moral and Natural Philosophy.” Journal of the History of Ideas 53.4 (1992), 573–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Didier. “Entre atomisme, alchimie et théologie: la réception des thèses d'Antoine de Villon et Étienne de Clave contre Aristote, Paracelse et les ‘cabalistes’.” Annals of Science 58 (2000): 241–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kargon, Robert. Atomism in England from Hariot to Newton. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Kessler, Eckhardt. “The Intellective Soul.” In The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy. Edited by C. B. Schmitt and Quentin Skinner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Kirsop, W. “Prolegomènes à une Étude de la Publication et de la Diffusion des Opera Omnia de Gassendi.” In Materia actuosa: antiquité, age classique, Lumières: mélanges en l'honneur d'Olivier Bloch. Edited by M. Benitez. Paris: H. Chamption, 2000.Google Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre. Études galiléennes. Paris: Hermann, 1939.Google Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre. Newtonian Studies. London: Chapman and Hall, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre. Galileo Studies. Translated by John Mepham. New Jersey: Humanities Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre. From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Kroll, Richard. “The Question of Locke's Relation to Gassendi.” Journal of the History of Ideas 45 (1984), 339–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, Richard. The Material Word: Literate Culture in the Restoration and Early Eighteenth Century.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991.
Leijenhorst, Cees. The Mechanisation of Aristotelianism: The Late Aristotelian Setting of Thomas Hobbes' Natural Philosophy. Leiden: Brill, 2002.Google Scholar
Lennon, Thomas. “The Epicurean New Way of Ideas: Gassendi, Locke, and Berkeley.” In Atoms, Pneuma and Tranquility: Epicurean and Stoic Themes in European Thought. Edited by Margaret J. Osler. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Lennon, Thomas. The Battle of the Gods and the Giants: The Legacy of Descartes and Gassendi, 1655–1715. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennon, Thomas. “Pandora, or, Essence and Reference: Gassendi's Nominalist Objection and Descartes' Realist Reply.” In Descartes and His Contemporaries: Meditations, Objections, and Replies. Edited by Roger Ariew and Marjorie Grene. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Lindberg, David. Theories of Vision from al-Kindi to Kepler. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.Google Scholar
LoLordo, Antonia. “The Activity of Matter in Gassendi's Physics.” Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 2 (2005), 75–104.Google Scholar
LoLordo, Antonia. “‘Descartes’ One Rule of Logic': Gassendi's Critique of Clear and Distinct Perception.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 13.1 (2005), 51–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LoLordo, Antonia. “Gassendi on Human Knowledge of the Mind.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 87.1 (2005), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A.Hellenistic Philosophy: Stoics, Epicureans, Sceptics.London: Duckworth, 1974.Google Scholar
Lüthy, Christoph. “Thoughts and Circumstances of Sebastien Basso: Analysis, Micro-History, Questions.” Early Science and Medicine 2.1 (1997), 1–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lüthy, Christoph. “The Fourfold Democritus on the Stage of Early Modern Science.” Isis 91.3 (2000), 443–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lüthy, Christoph. “An Aristotelian Watchdog as Avant-Garde Physicist: Julius Caesar Scaliger.” The Monist 84.4 (2001), 542–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntosh, John J. “Robert Boyle on Epicurean Atheism and Atomism.” In Atoms, Pneuma and Tranquility: Epicurean and Stoic Themes in European Thought. Edited by Margaret J. Osler. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Mancosu, Paolo. “Aristotelian Logic and Euclidean Mathematics: 17th Century Developments of the Quaestio de certitudine mathematicarum.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 23.3 (1992), 241–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancosu, Paolo, and Vailati, Ezio. “Torricelli's Infinitely Long Solid and Its Philosophical Reception in the 17th Century.” Isis 82 (1991), 50–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manzo, S. A. “Francis Bacon and Atomism: A Reappraisal.” In Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theory. Edited by Christoph Lüthy, John Murdoch, and William Newman. Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar
Mayo, Thomas F.Epicurus in England (1650–1725). Dallas: The Southwest Press, 1934.Google Scholar
Mazaurac, Simone. Gassendi, Pascal et la querelle du vide.Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinel, Christoph. “Early Seventeenth-Century Atomism: Theory, Epistemology, and Insufficiency of Experiment.” Isis 79 (1988), 68–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinel, Christoph. “Empirical Support for the Corpuscular Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century.” In Theory and Experience: Recent Insights and New Perspectives on their Relation. Edited by Diderik Batens and Jean Paul van Bendegem. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1988.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, Everett. Heat and Life: The Development of the Theory of Animal Heat. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menn, Stephen. Descartes and Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Michael, Emily. “Two Early Modern Concepts of Mind: Reflecting Substance vs. Thinking Substance.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 27 (1989), 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, Emily. “The Theory of Ideas in Gassendi and Locke.” Journal of the History of Ideas 51 (1990), 379–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, Emily. “Daniel Sennert on Matter and Form: At the Juncture of the Old and the New.” Early Science and Medicine 2.3 (1997), 272–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, Emily. “Sennert's Sea Change: Atoms and Causes.” In Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theories. Edited by Christoph Lüthy, John Murdoch, and William Newman. Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar
Michael, Emily, and Michael, Fred. “Gassendi on Sensation and Reflection: A Non-Cartesian Dualism.” History of European Ideas 9 (1988), 583–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, Emily, andMichael, Fred. “Corporeal Ideas in Seventeenth-Century Psychology.” Journal of the History of Ideas 50 (1989), 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, Emily, andMichael, Fred. “A Note on Gassendi in England.” Notes and Queries 37.3 (1990), 297–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, Emily, andMichael, Fred. “Gassendi's Modified Epicureanism and British Moral Philosophy.” History of European Ideas 21.6 (1995), 743–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, Fred. “Why Logic Became Epistemology: Gassendi, Port Royal and the Reformation in Logic.” In Logic and the Workings of the Mind: The Logic of Ideas and Faculty Psychology in Early Modern Philosophy. Edited by Patricia Easton. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, 1997.Google Scholar
Miller, Peter N.Peiresc's Europe: Learning and Virtue in the Seventeenth Century. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Möll, Konrad. Der junge Leibniz. 3 volumes. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1978–1996.Google Scholar
Monnoyeur, Françoise. “Matter: Descartes versus Gassendi.” Presentation to the University of Virginia philosophy department, October 2001. To be published as part of her Queen Christina and the Sciences of Her Time.Paris: Herman Cohen, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Murdoch, John E. “Infinity and Continuity.” In The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Edited by Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny, Jan Pinborg, and Eleanore Stump. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Murdoch, John E. “The Medieval and Renaissance Tradition of Minima Naturalia.” In Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theory. Edited by Christoph Lüthy, John Murdoch, and William Newman. Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar
Murr, Sylvia. “Préliminaires à la Physique Syntagma Philosophicum.” Dix-septième siècle 45.2 (1993), 353–485.Google Scholar
Nadler, Steven. “Doctrines of Explanation in Late Scholasticism and the Mechanical Philosophy.” In The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Edited by Daniel Garber and Michael Ayers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Newman, William R.The Alchemical Sources of Robert Boyle's Corpuscular Philosophy.” Annals of Science 53 (1996), 567–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, William R.“Experimental Corpuscular Theory in Aristotelian Alchemy: From Geber to Sennert.” In Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theory. Edited by Christoph Lüthy, John Murdoch, and William Newman. Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar
Newman, William R., and Principe, Larry. “Alchemy vs. Chemistry: The Etymological Origins of a Historiographical Mistake.” Early Science and Medicine 3.1 (1998), 32–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, William R., and Principe, Lawrence. Alchemy Tried in the Fire. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Normore, Calvin. “Meaning and Objective Being: Descartes and His Sources.” In Essays on Descartes' Meditations. Edited by Amelie Rorty. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Norton, David Fate. “The Myth of ‘British Empiricism’.” American Philosophical Quarterly 1 (1981), 331–44.Google Scholar
Nuchelmans, Gabriel. Late-Scholastic and Humanistic Theories of the Proposition. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1980.Google Scholar
Nuchelmans, Gabriel. Judgment and Proposition from Descartes to Kant. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1983.Google Scholar
Osler, Margaret J.Providence and Divine Will: The Theological Background to Gassendi's Views on Scientific Knowledge.” Journal of the History of Ideas 44 (1983), 549–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osler, Margaret J.“Baptizing Epicurean Atomism: Pierre Gassendi on the Immortality of the Soul.” In Religion, Science, and Worldview: Essays in Honor of Richard S. Westfall. Edited by Margaret J. Osler and Paul Lawrence Farber. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Osler, Margaret J. “Fortune, Fate, and Divination: Gassendi's Voluntarist Theology and the Baptism of Epicureanism.” In Atoms, Pneuma and Tranquility: Epicurean and Stoic Themes in European Thought. Edited by Margaret J. Osler. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osler, Margaret J.“The Intellectual Sources of Robert Boyle's Philosophy of Nature: Gassendi's Voluntarism and Boyle's Physico-Theological Project.” In Philosophy, Science and Religion in England, 1640–1700. Edited by Richard Kroll. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Osler, Margaret J.“Ancients, Moderns and the History of Philosophy: Gassendi's Epicurean Project.” In The Rise of Modern Philosophy: The Tension between the New and Traditional Philosophies from Machiavelli to Leibniz. Edited by Tom Sorell. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Osler, Margaret J.Divine Will and the Mechanical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osler, Margaret J.“Divine Will and Mathematical Truth: Gassendi and Descartes on the Status of Eternal Truths.” In Descartes and His Contemporaries: Meditations, Objections, and Replies. Edited by Roger Ariew and Marjorie Grene. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Osler, Margaret J.“How Mechanical Was the Mechanical Philosophy? Non-Epicurean Aspects of Gassendi's Philosophy of Nature.” In Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theory. Edited by Christoph Lüthy, John Murdoch, and William Newman. Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar
Osler, Margaret J.Whose Ends? Teleology in Early Modern Philosophy.” Osiris 16 (2001), 151–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osler, Margaret J.The History of Philosophy and the History of Philosophy: A Plea for Textual History in Context.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 40.4 (2002), 529–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagel, Walter. Joan Baptista van Helmont: Reformer of Science and Medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
Palmerino, Carla Rita. “Pierre Gassendi's De Philosophia Epicuri Universi Rediscovered.” Nuntius 14 (1998): 131–62.Google Scholar
Palmerino, Carla Rita. “Infinite Degrees of Speed: Marin Mersenne and the Debate over Galileo's Law of Free Fall.” Early Science and Medicine 4 (1999): 269–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PalmerinoRita, Carla. “Galileo's and Gassendi's Solution to the Rota Aristotelis Paradox: A Bridge between Matter and Motion Theories.” In Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theory. Edited by Christoph Lüthy, John Murdoch, and William Newman. Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar
Palmerino, Carla Rita. “Two Jesuit Responses to Galileo's Science of Motion: Honoré Fabri and Pierre Le Cazré.” In The New Science and Jesuit Science: Seventeenth Century Perspectives. Edited by Mordechai Feingold. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2003.Google Scholar
Palmerino, Carla Rita. “Gassendi's Reinterpretation of the Galilean Theory of Tides.” Perspectives on Science 12.2 (2004): 212–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmerino, Carla Rita, and Thijssen, J M M. H.. The Reception of the Galilean Science of Motion in Seventeenth-Century Europe. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panchieri, Lillian Unger. “The Magnet, the Oyster, and the Ape, or Pierre Gassendi and the Principle of Plenitude.” Modern Schoolman 53 (1976), 141–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panchieri, Lillian Unger. “Pierre Gassendi: A Forgotten but Important Man in the History of Physics.” American Journal of Physics 46 (1978), 435–63.Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert. Theories of Cognition in the Later Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Peter, Pav. “Gassendi's Statement of the Principle of Inertia.” Isis 57 (1966), 23–34.Google Scholar
Pintard, René. Le libertinage érudit dans la première moitié du XVII siècle. 2 volumes. Paris: Boivin, 1943.Google Scholar
Pintard, René. La Mothe le Vayer–Gassend–Guy Patin: Études de bibliographie et de critique suivies de textes inédits de Guy Patin. Paris: Boivin, 1943.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard. The History of Scepticism: From Savonarola to Bayle. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Principe, Lawrence. The Aspiring Adept: Robert Boyle and His Alchemical Quest. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Pyle, Andrew. Atomism and Its Critics: Problem Areas Associated with the Development of the Atomic Theory of Motion from Democritus to Newton. Bristol: Thoemmes, 1995.Google Scholar
Rochot, Bernard. Les travaux de Gassendi sur Epicure et sur l'atomisme, 1619–1658.Paris: J. Vrin, 1944.Google Scholar
Rochot, Bernard. “Gassendi et la ‘logique’ de Descartes.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l'étranger 141 (1951), 288–98.Google Scholar
Rochot, Bernard. “Chronologie de la Vie et des Ouvrages de Pierre Gassendi.” In Pierre Gassendi 1592–1655: Sa Vie et son Oeuvre. Edited by Bernard Rochot. Paris: Editions Albin Michel, 1955.Google Scholar
Rochot, Bernard. “Vie et Caractère.” In Pierre Gassendi 1592–1655: Sa Vie et son Oeuvre. Edited by Bernard Rochot. Paris: Editions Albin Michel, 1955.Google Scholar
Rochot, Bernard. “Comment Gassendi interprétait l'expérience du Puy de Dôme.” Revue d'histoire des sciences 16 (1963), 53–76.Google Scholar
Rodis-Lewis, Geneviève. Descartes: His Life and Thought. Translated by Jane Marie Todd. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Rogers, G. A. J.Gassendi and the Birth of Modern Philosophy.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 26.4 (1995), 681–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarasohn, Lisa T.The Ethical and Political Philosophy of Pierre Gassendi.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 20 (1982), 239–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarasohn, Lisa T.Motion and Morality: Pierre Gassendi, Thomas Hobbes, and the Mechanical World-View.” Journal of the History of Ideas 46 (1985): 363–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarasohn, Lisa T.French Reaction to the Condemnation of Galileo, 1632–1642.” Catholic Historical Review 74 (1988): 34–54.Google Scholar
Sarasohn, Lisa T.Nicolas-Claude Fabri de Peiresc and the Patronage of the New Science.” Isis 84 (1993), 70–90.Google Scholar
Sarasohn, Lisa T.Gassendi's Ethics: Freedom in a Mechanistic Universe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Charles B. “The Rediscovery of Ancient Skepticism in Modern Times.” In The Sceptical Tradition. Edited by Myles Burnyeat. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.
Schmitt, Charles B.The Aristotelian Tradition and Renaissance Universities. London: Variorum Reprints, 1984.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B.The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Secada, Jorge. Cartesian Metaphysics: The Late Scholastic Origins of Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, David. Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackelford, Joel. “Seeds with a Mechanical Purpose.” In Reading the Book of Nature. Edited by A. G. Debus and M. T. Walton. Kirksville, MO: Sixteenth Century Journal Publishers, 1998.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven, and Schaffer, Simon. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Simmons, Alison. “Explaining Sense Perception: A Scholastic Challenge.” Philosophical Studies 73.2–3 (1994), 257–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorabji, Richard. Time, Creation, and the Continuum: Theories in Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard. Matter, Space, and Motion: Theories in Antiquity and Their Sequel. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Sorrell, Tom. “Seventeenth-Century Materialism: Gassendi and Hobbes.” In The Renaissance and 17th Century Rationalism. Edited by G. H. R. Parkinson. New York: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Sortais, Gaston. La philosophie moderne depuis Bacon jusqu'à Leibniz. 2 volumes. Paris: Paul Lethielleux, 1920–2.Google Scholar
Spink, J. S.French Free-thought from Gassendi to Voltaire. New York: Greenwood Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Thorndike, L.A History Of Magic And Experimental Science. New York: Columbia University Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Vlastos, Gregory. “Minimal Parts in Epicurean Atomism.” Isis 56 (1965), 121–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Ralph. “Gassendi and Skepticism.” In The Sceptical Tradition. Edited by Myles Burnyeat. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Wallace, William. Prelude to Galileo: Essays on Medieval and Sixteenth-Century Sources of Galileo's Thought. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1981.Google Scholar
Westfall, Richard S.Force in Newton's Physics: The Science of Dynamics in the Seventeenth Century. New York: American Elsevier, 1971.Google Scholar
Wilson, Catherine. The Invisible World: Early Modern Philosophy and the Invention of the Microscope. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Wilson, Catherine. “Theological Foundations for Modern Science?Dialogue 36 (1997), 597–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yolton, John. Perceptual Acquaintance from Descartes to Reid.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Yolton, John. Perception and Reality: A History from Descartes to Kant.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
British Library MS Harley 1677 [portions of the work known as De vita et doctrina Epicuri], 1634. British Library, London.
De vita et moribus Epicuri libri octo. Lyon: Guillaume Barbier, 1647.
Animadversiones in decimum librum Diogenis Laertii, qui est de vita, moribus, placitisque Epicuri. Lyon: Guillaume Barbier, 1649.
Receuil de lettres des sieurs Morin, de la Roche, de Neure et Gassend: en suite l'apologie du Sieur Gassend touchant la question De motu impresso a motore translato.Paris: Augustin Courbé, 1650.
Institutio astronomica, juxta hypotheseis tam veterum, quam Copernici et Tychonis, dictata a Petro Gassendo regio matheseos professore. London: Jacob Flesher, 1653.
The Mirrour of True Nobility & Gentility. Being the life of the renowned Nicolaus Claudius Fabricius Lord of Peiresk, Senator of the Parliament at Aix. Written by the learned Petrus Gassendus, professor of the mathematicks to the King of France. Englished by W. Rand, Doctor of Physick. London: J. Streater for Humphrey Moseley, 1657.
Petri Gassendi Opera Omnia in sex tomos divisa. 6 volumes. Lyon: Laurent Anisson and Jean-Baptiste Devenet, 1658. Reprinted in facsimile with an introduction by Tullio Gregory. Stuttgart-Bad Canstatt: Friedrich Frohmann, 1964.
The Vanity of Judiciary Astrology, or, Divination by the stars. Lately written in Latin, by that great schollar and mathematician, the illustrious Petrus Gassendus, mathematical professor to the king of France. Translated into English by a person of quality. London: Humphrey Moseley, 1659.
Institutio logica, et Philosophiae Epicuri Syntagma. Authore V. Cl. Petro Gassendi.London: John Redmayne, 1668.
A Discourse on the Antiquity, Progress, and Augmentation of Astronomy. London: William Hawes, 1699.
Lettres familières à François Luillier pendant l'hiver 1632–1633. Edited by Bernard, Rochot. Paris: J. Vrin, 1944.Google Scholar
Dissertations en forme de paradoxes contre les Aristotéliciens (Exercitationes paradoxicae adversus Aristoteleos) Livres I et II. Edited and translated by Bernard Rochot. Paris: J. Vrin, 1959.
Disquisitio metaphysica; seu, Dubitationes et instantiae adversus Renati Cartesii Metaphysicam et responsa. Recherches métaphysiques; ou, Doutes et instances contre la Métaphysique de R. Descartes et ses réponses. Edited and translated by Bernard Rochot. Paris: J. Vrin, 1962.
The Selected Works of Pierre Gassendi. Edited and translated by Craig G. Brush. New York: Johnson Reprint, 1972.
Pierre Gassendi's Institutio Logica (1658). Edited and translated by Howard Jones. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1981.
Vie et Moeurs d'Epicure. 2 volumes. Translated by Sylvie Taussig. Paris: Editions Alive, 2001.
Pierre Gassendi (1592–1655): Lettres latines. 2 volumes. Translated by Sylvie Taussig. Turnhout: Brepols, 2004.
Aquinas, Thomas. The Summa Contra Gentiles of Saint Thomas Aquinas. London: Burns Oates and Washbourne, 1923.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa theologiae. London: Blackfriars, 1964.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. A Commentary on Aristotle's De Anima. Translated by Robert Pasnau. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Aristotle. The Complete Works of Aristotle. 2 volumes. Edited by Jonathan Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.
Arnauld, Antoine. On True and False Ideas. Translated by Elmar J. Kremer. Lewiston, NY: Lampeter, 1990.
Arnauld, Antoine, and Nicole, Pierre. Logic, or, The Art of Thinking. Translated by Jill Vance Buroker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augustine. Against the Academicians; The Teacher. [ContraAcademicos.] Translated by Peter King. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1995.
Bacon, Francis. The Advancement of Learning. Edited by Arthur, Johnston. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Baillet, Adrien. La vie de Monsieur Des-Cartes. 2 volumes. Paris: Daniel Horthemels, 1964.Google Scholar
Basso, Sebastien. Philosophia naturalis adversus Aristotelem, in quibus abstrusa veterum Physiologia restauratur, & Aristotelis errores solidis rationibus refelluntur. Geneva: Pierre de la Rouiere, 1621.
Bayle, Pierre. Dictionnaire historique et critique. 3rd edition. Rotterdam: Michel Böhm, 1720.
Bayle, Pierre. Historical and Critical Dictionary. Translated by Richard Popkin. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1991.
Beeckman, Isaac. Journal tenu par Isaac Beeckman de 1604–1634. Edited by Cornelius, Waard. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1939–53.Google Scholar
Berkeley George. Works of George Berkeley. Edited by Luce, A A and Jessop, T E. 9 volumes. London: Nelson, 1948–57.Google Scholar
Bernier, François. Abrégé de la philosophie de M. Gassendi. 8 volumes. Lyon: Anisson, Posuel & Rigaud, 1678. Reprint edition, edited by Sylvia, Murr and Geneviève, Stefani. Paris: Fayard, 1992.Google Scholar
Bernier, François. Three Discourses of Happiness, Virtue, and Liberty, collected from the works of the Learn'd Gassendi. London: Awnshawm & John Churchill, 1699.Google Scholar
Bougerel, Joseph. Vie de Pierre Gassendi, prévôt de l'église de Digne & professeur de mathématiques au Collège Royal. Paris: Jacques Vincent, 1737. Reprint, Geneva: Slatkine Reprints, 1970.
Burgersdijck, Franco. Idea philosophiae tum moralis, tum naturalis. Sive, Epitome compendiosa utriusque ex Aristotele excerpta, & methodice disposita. Oxford: Joseph Godwin and Richard Davis, 1667.
Burgersdijck, Franco. Franconis Burgersdici Institionum metaphysicarum lib. ii.London: J. Creek and J. Baker, 1653.Google Scholar
Campanella, Tommaso. De Sensu Rerum et Magia, Libri Quatuor. Frankfurt: Godefrid Tampachius, 1620.Google Scholar
Campanella, Tommaso. A Defence of Galileo the Mathematician from Florence. Edited and translated by Richard J. Blackwell. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Charleton, Walter. The Darkness of Atheism dispelled by the Light of Nature: A physico-theologicall treatise. London: J. F. for William Lee, 1652.Google Scholar
Charleton, Walter.Physiologia Epicuro–Gassendo–Charletoniana: or, A fabrick of science natural, upon the hypothesis of atoms, founded by Epicurus, repaired by Petrus Gassendus, augmented by Walter Charleton, Dr. in medicine, and physician to the late Charles, Monarch of Great-Britain. London: Tho. Newcomb for Thomas Heath, 1654.
Charleton, Walter.Epicurus's morals, collected partly out of his owne Greek text, in Diogenes Laertius, and partly out of the rhapsodies of Marcus Antoninus, Plutarch, Cicero, & Seneca. And faithfully Englished. London: William Wilson for Henry Herringman, 1656.
Charleton, Walter. The immortality of the human soul, demonstrated by the light of nature. In two dialogues.London: William Wilson for Henry Herringman, 1657.Google Scholar
Cicero, Marcus Tullius. De natura deorum. Academica. Translated by H. Rackham. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1940.Google Scholar
Clave, Étienne de. Nouvelle lumière philosophique des vrais principes et élémens de nature, & qualité d'iceux. Edited by Bernard, Joly. Paris: Fayard, 2000.Google Scholar
Clave, Étienne. Le cours de chimie, second liure des principes de nature. Paris: Olivier de Varennes, 1646.Google Scholar
Colegio, das Artes (Coimbra, Portugal). Commentarii Colegii Conimbricensis Societatis Iesu, in octo libros Physicorum Aristotelis Stagiritae. London: Horatio Cardon, 1602.Google Scholar
Artes, Colegio dasCommentarii Collegii Conimbricensis Societatis Iesu, in tres libros De anima Aristotelis Stagiritae.Cologne: Lazarus Zetner, 1617.Google Scholar
Cudworth, Ralph. The True Intellectual System of the Universe: The first part, wherein, all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted; and its impossibility demonstrated. London: Richard Royston, 1678.Google Scholar
Daniel, Gabriel. Voiage du monde de Descartes. Paris: Veuve de S. Benard, 1691.Google Scholar
Daniel, Gabriel. A voyage to the world of Cartesius. London: Thomas Bennet, 1692.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. 3 volumes. Translated by John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, Dugald Murdoch, and (3rd volume only) Anthony Kenny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984–91.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. Oeuvres de Descartes. 11 volumes. Edited by Charles Adam and Paul Tannery. Paris: J. Vrin, 1996.Google Scholar
Diogenes Laertius. Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Edited by R. D. Hicks. Loeb Classical Library. London: Heinemann, W, 1925.Google Scholar
Digby, Kenelm. Two treatises, in the one of which, the Nature of Bodies, in the other, the Nature of Mans Soule, is looked into, in way of discovery, of the immortality of reasonable soules. Paris: Gilles Blaizot, 1644.
Du Moulin, Pierre. La philosophie, mise en français, et divisée entre trois parties, sçavoir, elements de la logique, la physique ou science naturalle, l'ethyque ou science morale. Paris: Thomas Blaise and Olivier de Varenne, 1644.
Dupleix, Scipion. La Métaphysique. Edited by Roger, Ariew. Paris: Fayard, 1992.Google Scholar
Dupleix, Scipion. La Physique. Edited by Roger Ariew. Paris: Fayard, 1992.Google Scholar
Epicurus. Epicurus, the Extant Remains. Edited and translated by Cyril Bailey. Hildesheim: G. Olms, 1974.
Epicurus, . The Epicurus Reader: Selected Testimonia and Writings. Translated and edited by Brad Inwood and Lloyd Gerson. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1994.Google Scholar
Eustachius a Sancto Paolo. Summa philosophiae quadripartita: de rebus dialecticis, moralibus, physicis, & metaphysicis.Paris: Pierre Bilaine, 1620.
Fabricius, Hieronymus. The embryological treatises of Hieronymus Fabricius of Aquapendente: The formation of the egg and of the chick (De formatione ovi et pulli), The formed fetus (De formato fetus). Edited and translated by Howard B. Adelmann. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1942.Google Scholar
Fernel, Jean. The Physiologia of Jean Fernel (1567). Edited and translated by J. M. Forrester. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 2003.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio. Platonic Theology. Edited and translated by Michael J. B. Allen with John Warden. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Fleury, Marie-Antoinette, and Bailhache, Georges (editors). “Documents inédits sur Gassendi.” In Pierre Gassendi, 1592–1655. Edited by Bernard, Rochot. Paris: Editions Albin Michel, 1955.Google Scholar
Fludd, Robert. Utriusque cosmi maioris scilicet et minoris metaphysica, physica atque technica historia. Oppenheim: Johan-Theodor de Bry, 1617.
Fludd, Robert.Sophia cum moria certamen, in quo lapis Lydius a falso structore, fr. Marino Mersenno reprobatus, celeberrima voluminis sui Babylonici, in Genesim, figmenta accurate examinat. Frankfurt: Joachim Frizius, 1629.
Fludd, Robert.Doctor Fludds answer unto m. Foster, or, The squeesing of parson Fosters sponge, ordained by him for the wiping away of the weapon-salve. London: N. Butter, 1631.
Fludd, Robert.Clavis philosophiae et alchymiae Fluddanae, sive, Roberti Fluddi. Ad epistolicam Petri Gassendi Theologi exercitationem responsum. Frankfurt: William Fitzerum, 1633.
Fludd, Robert. Philosophia Moysaica. Gouda: Peter Rammazenius, 1638.Google Scholar
Fludd, Robert. Mosaicall philosophy: grounded upon the essential truth or eternal sapience. London: Humphrey Moseley, 1659.Google Scholar
Fludd, Robert.Robert Fludd and his Philosophicall Key. Edited by Allen, Debus. New York: Science History Publications, 1979.Google Scholar
Foster, William. Hoplocrisma-spongus, or, A sponge to wipe away the weapon-salve. London: Thomas Cotes for John Grove, 1631.Google Scholar
Galen. Selected Works. Edited and translated by Singer, P. N.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Galen.On the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato. Edited and translated by Phillip de Lacy. 2 volumes. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1980.
Galilei, Galileo. Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo. Translated by Stillman Drake. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor, 1957.Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo. Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo. Two New Sciences: Including Centers of Gravity and Force of Percussion. Translated by Stillman Drake. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Gilbert, William. De Magnete, Magnetisque Corporibus, et de magno magnete tellure. London: Peter Short, 1600.Google Scholar
Goclenius, Rudolf. Lexicon philosophicum: quo tanquam clave philosophiae fores aperiuntur. Frankfurt: 1613. Reprinted Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1964.Google Scholar
Harvey, William. Anatomical Exercitations, concerning the generation of living creatures. London: 1653.Google Scholar
Harvey, William. Disputations Touching the Generation of Animals. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 1981.Google Scholar
Hill, Nicholas. Philosophia Epicurea, Democriteana, Theophrastica proposita simpliciter, non edocta. Paris: R. Thierry, 1601.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Elementorum Philosophiae Sectio Prima De Corpore. London: Andreas Crook, 1655.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Opera philosophica quae latine scripsit. 5 volumes. Edited by William, Molesworth. London: Bohn, 1839–45.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Thomas White's De Mundo Examined. London: Bradford University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. The Correspondence. 2 volumes. Edited by Noel, Malcolm. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horace, . Satires, Epistles and Ars Poetica. Translated by H. Rushton Fairclough. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1926.Google Scholar
Hume, David. Enquiries concerning Human Understanding and concerning the Principles of Morals. Edited by Selby-Bigge, L. A., 3rd edition revised by P. H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature. Edited by Selby-Bigge, L A, 2nd edition revised by Nidditch, P H. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Huygens, Christian. Oeuvres complètes par la Societé Hollandaise des sciences. 22 volumes. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1888–1950.Google Scholar
Keckermann, Bartholomew. Systema Compendiosum Totius Mathematices, hoc est Geometriae, Optice, Astronomiae, et Geographiae. Oxford: William Hall for Francis Oxlad, 1651.Google Scholar
Poterie, Antoine. “Memoires Touchant la Naissance, Vie et Moeurs de Gassendi.” Edited by Philippe Tamizey de Larroque. Revue des Questions Historique 22 (1877), 211–40.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W.Philosophical Papers and Letters. Edited and translated by Leroy Loemker. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W.Die philosophischen Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. 7 volumes. Edited by Gerhardt, C I. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1960–1.Google Scholar
Lipsius, Justus. J. L. Manuductionis ad Stoicam philosophiam libri tres. Paris: Hadrian Perier, 1604.Google Scholar
Lipsius, Justus. J. Lipsii Physiologiae Stoicorum Libri Tres. Paris: Hadrian Perier, 1604.Google Scholar
Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by PeterH. Nidditch, . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Locke, John.Drafts for the ‘Essay Concerning Human Understanding’ and Other Philosophical Writings. Edited by Nidditch, P H and Rogers, G A J. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Lucretius Carus, Titus. De rerum natura. Edited by Cyril, Bailey. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1947.
Malebranche, Nicolas. Oeuvres complètes. 20 volumes. Edited by André, Robinet. Paris: J. Vrin, 1958–84.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. The Holy Family. Translated by R. Divson. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1956.Google Scholar
Mersenne, Marin. La vérité des sciences contre les sceptiques ou pyrrhoniens. Paris: 1625. Facsimile reprint, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Friedrich Frommann, 1969.Google Scholar
Mersenne, Marin. Correspondance du P. Marin Mersenne. 15 volumes. Edited by Cornelius de Waard and Armand Beaulieu. Paris: CNRS, 1933–83.Google Scholar
Molina, Luis de. Liberi Arbitrii cum Gratiae Donis, Divina Praescientia, Providentia, Praedestinatione et Reprobatione Concordia. Edited by J. Rabeneck. Ona: Collegium maximum Societatis Iesu, 1953.
More, Henry. Henry More's Manual of Metaphysics: A translation of the Enchiridion Metaphysicum (1679). Translated by Alexander Jacob. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1995.
Moxon, Joseph. A Tutor to Astronomy and Geography, Or, an Easie and Speedy Way to Know the Use of Both of the Globes, Coelestial and Terrestrial. London: Phillip Lea, 1699.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac. Unpublished Scientific Papers of Isaac Newton. Edited by Rupert, Hall and Marie Boas, Hall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac.Certain Philosophical Questions: Newton's Trinity Notebook. Edited by McGuire, J E and Martin, Tamny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac.Philosophical Writings. Edited by Andrew, Janiak. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Pascal, Blaise. The Physical Treatises of Pascal: The Equilibrium of Liquids and the Weight of the Mass of the Air. Translated by A. G. H. Spiers. New York: Columbia University Press, 1937.Google Scholar
Pascal, Blaise.Oeuvres complètes. 4 volumes. Edited by Jean, Mesnard. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1964–92.Google Scholar
Patrizi, Francesco. Discussionum peripateticarum tomi IV, quibus Aristotelicae philosophiae universa historia atque dogmata nunc veterum placitis collata, eleganter et erudite declarantur. Basel: ad Pernam Lecythum, 1581.
Patrizi, Francesco. Nova de Universis Philosophia. Ferrara: Benedict Mammarelli, 1591.Google Scholar
Peiresc, Nicolas-Claude Fabri. Lettres de Peiresc. 7 volumes. Edited by Philippe Tamizey de Larroque. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale, 1893.Google Scholar
Pemble, William. De Origine Formarum. Cambridge: Roger Daniel for John Bartlett, 1650.Google Scholar
Philodemus, . Philodemus: On Methods of Inference. Edited and translated by Phillip de Lacey and Estelle de Lacey. Naples: Bibliopolis, 1978.Google Scholar
Raphson, Joseph. De Spatio Reali seu Ente Infinito. London: John Taylor, 1697.Google Scholar
Sanderson, Robert. Logicae Artis Compendium. 2nd edition. Oxford: John Lichfield and Jacob Short, 1618.Google Scholar
Sennert, Daniel. Epitome Naturalis Scientiae. Oxford: SJohn Lichfield and Henry Cripps, 1632.Google Scholar
Sennert, Daniel. Hypomnemata Physica. Frankfurt: Clement Schleich, 1636.Google Scholar
Severinus, Petrus. Idea Medicinae Philosophicae. Basel: Henricpetrus, 1571.Google Scholar
Empiricus, Sextus. Adversus Mathematicos. Loeb Classical Library. 4 volumes. Edited and translated by R. G. Bury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Empiricus, Sextus. Outlines of Scepticism. Translated by Julia Annas and Jonathan Barnes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Stanley, Thomas. The History of Philosophy: Containing the Lives, Opinions, Actions and Discourses of the Philosophers of Every Sect. 3 volumes. London: Thomas Bassett, 1687.Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco. Disputationes metaphysicae. 2 volumes. Reprint Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1965.
Suárez, Francisco. On Efficient Causality: Metaphysical Disputations 17, 18 and 19. Translated by A. J. Freddosso. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco. On the Formal Cause of Substance: Metaphysical Disputation XV. Translated by John Kronen. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco. On Creation, Conservation, and Concurrence: Metaphysical Disputations 20, 21, and 22. Translated by A. J. Freddosso. South Bend, IN: St. Augustine's Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Telesio, Bernardino. De rerum natura iuxta propria principia. Naples: I. Cacchius, 1570.Google Scholar
Toletus, Francisco. Commentaria una cum Quaestionibus in Octo Libros Aristotelis de Physica auscultatione. Item in Lib. Arist. De Generatione et Corruptione. Rome: I. Martinelli, 1590.Google Scholar
Van Helmont, Jean-Baptiste. Ortus medicinae. Id est, initia physicae inaudita. Progressus medicinae novus, in morborum ultionem, ad vitam longam. Amsterdam: Ludovic Elzevier, 1648.
Adelmann, Howard B.Marcello Malpighi and the Evolution of Embryology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Alexander, Peter. Ideas, Qualities and Corpuscles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Algra, Keimpe, Barnes, Jonathan, Mansfeld, Jaap, and Schofield, Malcolm (editors). The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, James. Inference from Signs: Ancient Debates about the Nature of Evidence.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Annas, Julia. “Epicurus' Philosophy of Mind.” In Companions to Ancient Thought II: Psychology. Edited by Stephen, Everson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Annas, Julia. Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind.Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Annas, Julia, and Barnes, Jonathan. The Modes of Scepticism: Ancient Texts and Modern Interpretations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
Ariew, Roger. “Damned If You Do: Cartesians and Censorship, 1663–1706.” Perspectives on Science (1994), 255–74.Google Scholar
Ariew, Roger. Descartes and the Last Scholastics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Ariew, Roger, and Grene, Marjorie. Descartes and His Contemporaries: Meditations, Objections and Replies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Armogathe, Jean-Robert. “L'Enseignement de Pierre Gassendi au Collège Royal d'Aix-en-Provence et la Traditions Philosophique des Grands Carmes.” In Gassendi et l'Europe, 1592–1792: actes du colloque international de Paris. Edited by Sylvia Murr. Paris: J. Vrin, 1997.Google Scholar
Armogathe, Jean-Robert. “Proofs of the Existence of God.” In The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Edited by Daniel Garber and Michael Ayers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. J.Language and Logic in the Post-Medieval Period. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E. J.Studies in Post-Medieval Semantics. London: Variorum Reprints, 1985.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. J.“Traditional Logic.” In The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy. Edited by C. B. Schmitt and Quentin Skinner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Asmis, Elizabeth. Epicurus' Scientific Method. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Ayers, Michael. Locke: Epistemology and Ontology. New York: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
Ayers, Michael. “Ideas and Objective Being.” In The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Edited by Daniel Garber and Michael Ayers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Ayers, Michael. “Theories of Knowledge and Belief.” In The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Edited by Daniel Garber and Michael Ayers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Barber, Kenneth, and Gracia, Jorge. Individuation and Identity in Early Modern Philosophy: Descartes to Kant.Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F. J.Galileo's French Correspondents.” Annals of Science 45 (1988): 169–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaulieu, Armand. “Les Réactions des Savants Français au Debut du XVII Siècle devant l'Héliocentrisme de Galilée.” In Novità celesti e crisi del sapere. Edited by Paolo Galluzzi. Florence: Giunta Barbera, 1984.Google Scholar
Berr, Henri. Du scepticisme de Gassendi. Translated by Bernard Rochot. Paris: Albin Michel, 1960.Google Scholar
Blackwell, Constance, and Kusukawa, S. (editors). Philosophy in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries: Conversations with Aristotle. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate, 1999.Google Scholar
Blackwell, Richard J.Galileo, Bellarmine, and the Bible. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Bloch, Olivier. La philosophie de Gassendi: nominalisme, matérialisme, et métaphysique. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1971.Google Scholar
Bloch, Olivier. “Gassendi and the Transition from the Middle Ages to the Classical Era.” Yale French Studies 49 (1973), 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Reinhard. “Historical Observations on the Genesis of the Three-Dimensional Optical Picture (Gassendi, Locke, Berkeley)”. Ratio 17.1 (1975), 176–90.Google Scholar
Brett, G. S.The Philosophy of Gassendi. London: Macmillan, 1908.Google Scholar
Brockliss, L. W. B.French Higher Education in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries: A Cultural History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Brockliss, L. W. B.Descartes, Gassendi, and the Reception of the Mechanical Philosophy in the French Collèges de Plein Exercise, 1640–1730.” Perspectives on Science 3.4 (1995), 450–79.Google Scholar
Brundell, Barry. Pierre Gassendi: From Aristotelianism to a New Natural Philosophy. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, Miles. “Idealism and Greek Philosophy: What Descartes Saw and Berkeley Missed.” The Philosophical Review 91 (1982), 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centre International d'Études Gassendiennes. Catalogue: Pierre Gassendi. Digne-les-Bains: Centre International d'Études Gassendiennes, 1992.
Chappell, Vere. Essays on Early Modern Philosophers: Grotius to Gassendi. New York: Garland, 1992.Google Scholar
Clark, J. T.Pierre Gassendi and the Physics of Galileo.” Isis 54 (1963), 351–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Desmond. Occult Powers and Hypotheses: Cartesian Natural Philosophy under Louis XIV. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Clatterbaugh, Kenneth. The Causation Debate in Early Modern Philosophy, 1637–1739. New York: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar
Clericuzio, Antonio. Elements, Principles and Corpuscles: A Study of Atomism and Chemistry in the Seventeenth Century. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clericuzio, Antonio. “Gassendi, Charleton and Boyle on Matter and Motion.” In Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theories. Edited by Christoph Lüthy, John Murdoch, and William Newman. Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar
Clucas, Stephen. “The Atomism of the Cavendish Circle: A Reappraisal.” The Seventeenth Century 9.2 (1994), 247–68.Google Scholar
Clucas, Stephen. “The Infinite Variety of Formes and Magnitudes: 16th and 17th Century English Corpuscular Philosophy and Aristotelian Theories of Matter and Form.” Early Science and Medicine 2.3 (1997), 257–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clucas, Stephen. “Corpuscular Matter Theory in the Northumberland Circle.” In Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theories. Edited by Christoph Lüthy, John Murdoch, and William Newman. Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar
Crocker, Robert. Henry More, 1614–1687: A Biography of the Cambridge Platonist. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, Andrew. “The Identity of Natural Philosophy: A Response to Edward Grant.” Early Science and Medicine 5.3 (2000), 259–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darmon, Jean-Claude. “Gassendi et la ‘rhetorique’ de Descartes.” Papers on French Seventeenth Century Literature 25.49 (1998), 401–29.Google Scholar
Darmon, Jean-Claude. Philosophie épicurienne et littérature au XVIIe siècle en France.Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1998.Google Scholar
Dear, Peter. Mersenne and the Learning of the Schools. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Dear, Peter. Discipline and Experience. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dear, Peter. “Method and the Study of Nature.” In The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Edited by Daniel Garber and Michael Ayers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Debus, Allen. The French Paracelsans: The Chemical Challenge to Medical and Scientific Tradition in Early Modern France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Des Chene, Dennis. Physiologia: Natural Philosophy in Late Aristotelian and Cartesian Thought. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Des Chene, Dennis. Life's Forms. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Des Chene, Dennis. Spirits and Clocks: Machine and Organism in Descartes.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Duchesneau, François. Les modèles du vivant de Descartes à Leibniz.Paris: J. Vrin, 1998.Google Scholar
Dutton, Blake. “Physics and Metaphysics in Descartes and Galileo.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 37.1 (1999), 49–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easton, Patricia (editor). Logic and the Workings of the Mind: The Logic of Ideas and Faculty Psychology in Early Modern Philosophy. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, 1997.Google Scholar
Egan, Howard. Gassendi's View of Knowledge: A Study of the Epistemological Basis of His Knowledge. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1984.Google Scholar
Emerton, Norma E.The Scientific Reinterpretation of Form. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Everson, Stephen. “Epicurus on the Truth of the Senses.” In Companions to Ancient Thought I: Epistemology. Edited by Stephen Everson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Everson, Stephen. “Epicurus on Mind and Language.” In Companions to Ancient Thought III: Language. Edited by Stephen Everson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Findlen, Paula (editor). Athanasius Kircher: The Last Man who Knew Everything. New York: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar
Fine, Gail. “Descartes and Ancient Skepticism: Reheated Cabbage?The Philosophical Review 109.2 (2000), 195–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Saul. “Science and Skepticism in the 17th Century: The Atomism and Scientific Method of Pierre Gassendi.” PhD dissertation, CUNY, 1997.
Fisher, Saul. “Gassendi's Atomist Account of Generation and Heredity in Plants and Animals.” Perspectives on Science 11.4 (2003), 484–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floridi, Luciano. Sextus Empiricus: The Transmission and Recovery of Pyrrhonism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Fouke, Daniel C.‘Mechanical’ and ‘Organical’ Models in 17th Century Models of Biological Reproduction.” Science in Context 3.2 (1989), 366–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fouke, Daniel C.“Pascal's Physics.” In The Cambridge Companion to Pascal. Edited by Nicholas Hammond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Fowler, D., and Fowler, P. G.. Lucretius on Atomic Motion: A Commentary on De Rerum Natura. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Frank, Robert G.Harvey and the Oxford Physiologists. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Freddoso, Alfred J.God's General Concurrence with Secondary Causes: Why Conservation Is Not Enough.” Philosophical Perspectives 5 (1991), 553–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freddoso, Alfred J.God's General Concurrence with Secondary Causes: Pitfalls and Prospects.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 67 (1994), 131–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, R K. William Harvey's Natural Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freudenthal, Gad. “Stoic Concepts in Mechanical Philosophy: The Problem of Electrical Attraction.” In Renaissance and Revolution: Humanists, Scholars, Craftsmen and Natural Philosophers in Early Modern Europe. Edited by J. V. Field and James Frank. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Fuchs, T., and Grene, M. G.. The Mechanization of the Heart: Harvey and Descartes. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Furley, David J. “Aristotle and the Atomists on Motion in a Void.” In Motion and Time, Space and Matter. Edited by Peter K. Machamer and R. G. Turnbull. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan. “New Doctrines of Motion.” In The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Edited by Daniel Garber and Michael Ayers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan, and Roger Ariew. “Body: The Scholastic Background.” In The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Edited by Daniel Garber and Michael Ayers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Galluzzi, Paolo. “Gassendi and l'Affaire Galilée of the Laws of Motion.” Science in Context 13.3–4 (2000), 509–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garber, Daniel. “Semel in Vita.” In Essays on Descartes' Meditations. Edited by Amelie Rorty. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel. Descartes' Metaphysical Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel. “Descartes and Occasionalism.” In Causation in Early Modern Philosophy. Edited by Steven Nadler. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Gatti, Hillary. “Giordano Bruno's Soul-Powered Atoms.” In Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theories. Edited by Christoph Lüthy, John Murdoch, and William Newman. Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen. Descartes: An Intellectual Biography. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen. Francis Bacon and the Transformation of Early Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen. Descartes' System of Natural Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glidden, David. “Hellenistic Background for Gassendi's Theory of Ideas.” Journal of the History of Ideas 49 (1988), 405–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glidden, David. “Parrots, Pyrrhonists and Native Speakers.” In Companions to Ancient Thought III: Language. Edited by Stephen Everson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Gorman, M. J.A Matter of Faith? Christoph Scheiner, Jesuit Censorship, and the Trial of Galileo.” Perspectives in Science 4.3 (1996), 283–320.Google Scholar
Grant, Edward. “The Condemnation of 1277, God's Absolute Power, and Physical Thought in the Late Middle Ages.” Viator: Medieval and Renaissance Studies 10 (1979), 211–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, Edward. Much Ado About Nothing: Theories of Space and the Vacuum from the Middle Ages to the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, Edward. “The Condemnation of 1277.” In The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Edited by Norman Kretzman, Anthony Kenny, and Jan Pinborg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Grant, Edward. “God and Natural Philosophy: The Late Middle Ages and Sir Isaac Newton.” Early Science and Medicine 5.3 (2000), 279–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, Tullio. “Libertinisme Érudit in Seventeenth-Century France and Italy: The Critique of Ethics and Religion.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 6.3 (1998), 323–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grene, Marjorie. Descartes. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Guerlac, Henri. “Can There Be Colors in the Dark?Journal of the History of Ideas 47.1 (1986), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, A. Rupert. Henry More: Magic, Religion and Experiment. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1990.Google Scholar
Hatfield, Gary. “Force (God) in Descartes' Physics.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 10 (1979), 113–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatfield, Gary. “The Senses and the Fleshless Eye: The Meditations as Cognitive Exercises.” In Essays on Descartes' Meditations. Edited by Amelie Rorty. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Hatfield, Gary. “The Workings of the Intellect: Mind and Psychology.” In Logic and the Workings of the Mind: The Logic of Ideas and Faculty Psychology in Early Modern Philosophy. Edited by Patricia Easton. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, 1997.Google Scholar
Hatfield, Gary. “The Cognitive Faculties.” In The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Edited by Daniel Garber and Michael Ayers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Headley, John M.Tommaso Campanella and the Transformation of the World.Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Henry, John. “Occult Qualities and the Experimental Philosophy: Active Principles in Pre-Newtonian Matter Theory.” History of Science 24 (1986), 335–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, John. “Void Space, Mathematical Realism and Francesco Patrizi da Cherso's Use of Atomistic Arguments.” In Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theories. Edited by Christoph Lüthy, John Murdoch, and William R. Newman. Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar
Hervey, Helen. “Hobbes and Descartes in the Light of some Unpublished Letters of the Correspondence between Sir Charles Cavendish and Dr. John Pell”. Osiris 10 (1952), 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirai, Hiro. “Concepts of Seeds and Nature in the Work of Marsilio Ficino.” In Marsilio Ficino: His Theology, His Philosophy, His Legacy. Edited by Michael J. B. Allen and Valery Rees. Leiden: Brill, 2002.Google Scholar
Holden, Thomas. The Architecture of Matter: Galileo to Kant. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffman, William H.Robert Fludd and the End of the Renaissance. London: Routledge, 1988.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Keith. “What Happened to Occult Qualities in the Scientific Revolution?Isis 73 (1982), 233–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Susan. “Certain and Less Certain Knowledge.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 87 (1987), 227–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Susan. Passion and Action: The Emotions in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Jardine, Nicolas. The Birth of History and Philosophy of Science: Kepler's A Defence of Tycho against Ursus; with Essays on Its Provenance and Significance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Jones, Howard. Pierre Gassendi, 1592–1655: An Intellectual Biography. Nieuwkoop: B. De Graaf, 1981.Google Scholar
Jones, Howard. The Epicurean Tradition. London: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
Jones, Howard. “Gassendi and Locke on Ideas.” In Essays on Early Modern Philosophers: Grotius to Gassendi. Edited by V. C. Chappell. New York: Garland, 1992.Google Scholar
Joy, Lynn Sumida. Gassendi the Atomist: Advocate of History in an Age of Science.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Joy, Lynn Sumida. “The Conflict of Mechanisms and Its Empiricist Outcome.” Monist 71 (1988), 498–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joy, Lynn Sumida. “Epicureanism in Renaissance Moral and Natural Philosophy.” Journal of the History of Ideas 53.4 (1992), 573–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Didier. “Entre atomisme, alchimie et théologie: la réception des thèses d'Antoine de Villon et Étienne de Clave contre Aristote, Paracelse et les ‘cabalistes’.” Annals of Science 58 (2000): 241–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kargon, Robert. Atomism in England from Hariot to Newton. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Kessler, Eckhardt. “The Intellective Soul.” In The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy. Edited by C. B. Schmitt and Quentin Skinner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Kirsop, W. “Prolegomènes à une Étude de la Publication et de la Diffusion des Opera Omnia de Gassendi.” In Materia actuosa: antiquité, age classique, Lumières: mélanges en l'honneur d'Olivier Bloch. Edited by M. Benitez. Paris: H. Chamption, 2000.Google Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre. Études galiléennes. Paris: Hermann, 1939.Google Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre. Newtonian Studies. London: Chapman and Hall, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre. Galileo Studies. Translated by John Mepham. New Jersey: Humanities Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre. From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Kroll, Richard. “The Question of Locke's Relation to Gassendi.” Journal of the History of Ideas 45 (1984), 339–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, Richard. The Material Word: Literate Culture in the Restoration and Early Eighteenth Century.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991.
Leijenhorst, Cees. The Mechanisation of Aristotelianism: The Late Aristotelian Setting of Thomas Hobbes' Natural Philosophy. Leiden: Brill, 2002.Google Scholar
Lennon, Thomas. “The Epicurean New Way of Ideas: Gassendi, Locke, and Berkeley.” In Atoms, Pneuma and Tranquility: Epicurean and Stoic Themes in European Thought. Edited by Margaret J. Osler. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Lennon, Thomas. The Battle of the Gods and the Giants: The Legacy of Descartes and Gassendi, 1655–1715. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennon, Thomas. “Pandora, or, Essence and Reference: Gassendi's Nominalist Objection and Descartes' Realist Reply.” In Descartes and His Contemporaries: Meditations, Objections, and Replies. Edited by Roger Ariew and Marjorie Grene. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Lindberg, David. Theories of Vision from al-Kindi to Kepler. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.Google Scholar
LoLordo, Antonia. “The Activity of Matter in Gassendi's Physics.” Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 2 (2005), 75–104.Google Scholar
LoLordo, Antonia. “‘Descartes’ One Rule of Logic': Gassendi's Critique of Clear and Distinct Perception.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 13.1 (2005), 51–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LoLordo, Antonia. “Gassendi on Human Knowledge of the Mind.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 87.1 (2005), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A.Hellenistic Philosophy: Stoics, Epicureans, Sceptics.London: Duckworth, 1974.Google Scholar
Lüthy, Christoph. “Thoughts and Circumstances of Sebastien Basso: Analysis, Micro-History, Questions.” Early Science and Medicine 2.1 (1997), 1–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lüthy, Christoph. “The Fourfold Democritus on the Stage of Early Modern Science.” Isis 91.3 (2000), 443–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lüthy, Christoph. “An Aristotelian Watchdog as Avant-Garde Physicist: Julius Caesar Scaliger.” The Monist 84.4 (2001), 542–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntosh, John J. “Robert Boyle on Epicurean Atheism and Atomism.” In Atoms, Pneuma and Tranquility: Epicurean and Stoic Themes in European Thought. Edited by Margaret J. Osler. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Mancosu, Paolo. “Aristotelian Logic and Euclidean Mathematics: 17th Century Developments of the Quaestio de certitudine mathematicarum.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 23.3 (1992), 241–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancosu, Paolo, and Vailati, Ezio. “Torricelli's Infinitely Long Solid and Its Philosophical Reception in the 17th Century.” Isis 82 (1991), 50–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manzo, S. A. “Francis Bacon and Atomism: A Reappraisal.” In Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theory. Edited by Christoph Lüthy, John Murdoch, and William Newman. Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar
Mayo, Thomas F.Epicurus in England (1650–1725). Dallas: The Southwest Press, 1934.Google Scholar
Mazaurac, Simone. Gassendi, Pascal et la querelle du vide.Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinel, Christoph. “Early Seventeenth-Century Atomism: Theory, Epistemology, and Insufficiency of Experiment.” Isis 79 (1988), 68–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinel, Christoph. “Empirical Support for the Corpuscular Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century.” In Theory and Experience: Recent Insights and New Perspectives on their Relation. Edited by Diderik Batens and Jean Paul van Bendegem. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1988.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, Everett. Heat and Life: The Development of the Theory of Animal Heat. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menn, Stephen. Descartes and Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Michael, Emily. “Two Early Modern Concepts of Mind: Reflecting Substance vs. Thinking Substance.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 27 (1989), 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, Emily. “The Theory of Ideas in Gassendi and Locke.” Journal of the History of Ideas 51 (1990), 379–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, Emily. “Daniel Sennert on Matter and Form: At the Juncture of the Old and the New.” Early Science and Medicine 2.3 (1997), 272–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, Emily. “Sennert's Sea Change: Atoms and Causes.” In Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theories. Edited by Christoph Lüthy, John Murdoch, and William Newman. Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar
Michael, Emily, and Michael, Fred. “Gassendi on Sensation and Reflection: A Non-Cartesian Dualism.” History of European Ideas 9 (1988), 583–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, Emily, andMichael, Fred. “Corporeal Ideas in Seventeenth-Century Psychology.” Journal of the History of Ideas 50 (1989), 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, Emily, andMichael, Fred. “A Note on Gassendi in England.” Notes and Queries 37.3 (1990), 297–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, Emily, andMichael, Fred. “Gassendi's Modified Epicureanism and British Moral Philosophy.” History of European Ideas 21.6 (1995), 743–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, Fred. “Why Logic Became Epistemology: Gassendi, Port Royal and the Reformation in Logic.” In Logic and the Workings of the Mind: The Logic of Ideas and Faculty Psychology in Early Modern Philosophy. Edited by Patricia Easton. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, 1997.Google Scholar
Miller, Peter N.Peiresc's Europe: Learning and Virtue in the Seventeenth Century. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Möll, Konrad. Der junge Leibniz. 3 volumes. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1978–1996.Google Scholar
Monnoyeur, Françoise. “Matter: Descartes versus Gassendi.” Presentation to the University of Virginia philosophy department, October 2001. To be published as part of her Queen Christina and the Sciences of Her Time.Paris: Herman Cohen, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Murdoch, John E. “Infinity and Continuity.” In The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Edited by Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny, Jan Pinborg, and Eleanore Stump. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Murdoch, John E. “The Medieval and Renaissance Tradition of Minima Naturalia.” In Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theory. Edited by Christoph Lüthy, John Murdoch, and William Newman. Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar
Murr, Sylvia. “Préliminaires à la Physique Syntagma Philosophicum.” Dix-septième siècle 45.2 (1993), 353–485.Google Scholar
Nadler, Steven. “Doctrines of Explanation in Late Scholasticism and the Mechanical Philosophy.” In The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Edited by Daniel Garber and Michael Ayers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Newman, William R.The Alchemical Sources of Robert Boyle's Corpuscular Philosophy.” Annals of Science 53 (1996), 567–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, William R.“Experimental Corpuscular Theory in Aristotelian Alchemy: From Geber to Sennert.” In Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theory. Edited by Christoph Lüthy, John Murdoch, and William Newman. Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar
Newman, William R., and Principe, Larry. “Alchemy vs. Chemistry: The Etymological Origins of a Historiographical Mistake.” Early Science and Medicine 3.1 (1998), 32–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, William R., and Principe, Lawrence. Alchemy Tried in the Fire. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Normore, Calvin. “Meaning and Objective Being: Descartes and His Sources.” In Essays on Descartes' Meditations. Edited by Amelie Rorty. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Norton, David Fate. “The Myth of ‘British Empiricism’.” American Philosophical Quarterly 1 (1981), 331–44.Google Scholar
Nuchelmans, Gabriel. Late-Scholastic and Humanistic Theories of the Proposition. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1980.Google Scholar
Nuchelmans, Gabriel. Judgment and Proposition from Descartes to Kant. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1983.Google Scholar
Osler, Margaret J.Providence and Divine Will: The Theological Background to Gassendi's Views on Scientific Knowledge.” Journal of the History of Ideas 44 (1983), 549–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osler, Margaret J.“Baptizing Epicurean Atomism: Pierre Gassendi on the Immortality of the Soul.” In Religion, Science, and Worldview: Essays in Honor of Richard S. Westfall. Edited by Margaret J. Osler and Paul Lawrence Farber. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Osler, Margaret J. “Fortune, Fate, and Divination: Gassendi's Voluntarist Theology and the Baptism of Epicureanism.” In Atoms, Pneuma and Tranquility: Epicurean and Stoic Themes in European Thought. Edited by Margaret J. Osler. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osler, Margaret J.“The Intellectual Sources of Robert Boyle's Philosophy of Nature: Gassendi's Voluntarism and Boyle's Physico-Theological Project.” In Philosophy, Science and Religion in England, 1640–1700. Edited by Richard Kroll. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Osler, Margaret J.“Ancients, Moderns and the History of Philosophy: Gassendi's Epicurean Project.” In The Rise of Modern Philosophy: The Tension between the New and Traditional Philosophies from Machiavelli to Leibniz. Edited by Tom Sorell. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Osler, Margaret J.Divine Will and the Mechanical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osler, Margaret J.“Divine Will and Mathematical Truth: Gassendi and Descartes on the Status of Eternal Truths.” In Descartes and His Contemporaries: Meditations, Objections, and Replies. Edited by Roger Ariew and Marjorie Grene. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Osler, Margaret J.“How Mechanical Was the Mechanical Philosophy? Non-Epicurean Aspects of Gassendi's Philosophy of Nature.” In Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theory. Edited by Christoph Lüthy, John Murdoch, and William Newman. Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar
Osler, Margaret J.Whose Ends? Teleology in Early Modern Philosophy.” Osiris 16 (2001), 151–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osler, Margaret J.The History of Philosophy and the History of Philosophy: A Plea for Textual History in Context.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 40.4 (2002), 529–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagel, Walter. Joan Baptista van Helmont: Reformer of Science and Medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
Palmerino, Carla Rita. “Pierre Gassendi's De Philosophia Epicuri Universi Rediscovered.” Nuntius 14 (1998): 131–62.Google Scholar
Palmerino, Carla Rita. “Infinite Degrees of Speed: Marin Mersenne and the Debate over Galileo's Law of Free Fall.” Early Science and Medicine 4 (1999): 269–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PalmerinoRita, Carla. “Galileo's and Gassendi's Solution to the Rota Aristotelis Paradox: A Bridge between Matter and Motion Theories.” In Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theory. Edited by Christoph Lüthy, John Murdoch, and William Newman. Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar
Palmerino, Carla Rita. “Two Jesuit Responses to Galileo's Science of Motion: Honoré Fabri and Pierre Le Cazré.” In The New Science and Jesuit Science: Seventeenth Century Perspectives. Edited by Mordechai Feingold. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2003.Google Scholar
Palmerino, Carla Rita. “Gassendi's Reinterpretation of the Galilean Theory of Tides.” Perspectives on Science 12.2 (2004): 212–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmerino, Carla Rita, and Thijssen, J M M. H.. The Reception of the Galilean Science of Motion in Seventeenth-Century Europe. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panchieri, Lillian Unger. “The Magnet, the Oyster, and the Ape, or Pierre Gassendi and the Principle of Plenitude.” Modern Schoolman 53 (1976), 141–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panchieri, Lillian Unger. “Pierre Gassendi: A Forgotten but Important Man in the History of Physics.” American Journal of Physics 46 (1978), 435–63.Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert. Theories of Cognition in the Later Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Peter, Pav. “Gassendi's Statement of the Principle of Inertia.” Isis 57 (1966), 23–34.Google Scholar
Pintard, René. Le libertinage érudit dans la première moitié du XVII siècle. 2 volumes. Paris: Boivin, 1943.Google Scholar
Pintard, René. La Mothe le Vayer–Gassend–Guy Patin: Études de bibliographie et de critique suivies de textes inédits de Guy Patin. Paris: Boivin, 1943.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard. The History of Scepticism: From Savonarola to Bayle. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Principe, Lawrence. The Aspiring Adept: Robert Boyle and His Alchemical Quest. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Pyle, Andrew. Atomism and Its Critics: Problem Areas Associated with the Development of the Atomic Theory of Motion from Democritus to Newton. Bristol: Thoemmes, 1995.Google Scholar
Rochot, Bernard. Les travaux de Gassendi sur Epicure et sur l'atomisme, 1619–1658.Paris: J. Vrin, 1944.Google Scholar
Rochot, Bernard. “Gassendi et la ‘logique’ de Descartes.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l'étranger 141 (1951), 288–98.Google Scholar
Rochot, Bernard. “Chronologie de la Vie et des Ouvrages de Pierre Gassendi.” In Pierre Gassendi 1592–1655: Sa Vie et son Oeuvre. Edited by Bernard Rochot. Paris: Editions Albin Michel, 1955.Google Scholar
Rochot, Bernard. “Vie et Caractère.” In Pierre Gassendi 1592–1655: Sa Vie et son Oeuvre. Edited by Bernard Rochot. Paris: Editions Albin Michel, 1955.Google Scholar
Rochot, Bernard. “Comment Gassendi interprétait l'expérience du Puy de Dôme.” Revue d'histoire des sciences 16 (1963), 53–76.Google Scholar
Rodis-Lewis, Geneviève. Descartes: His Life and Thought. Translated by Jane Marie Todd. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Rogers, G. A. J.Gassendi and the Birth of Modern Philosophy.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 26.4 (1995), 681–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarasohn, Lisa T.The Ethical and Political Philosophy of Pierre Gassendi.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 20 (1982), 239–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarasohn, Lisa T.Motion and Morality: Pierre Gassendi, Thomas Hobbes, and the Mechanical World-View.” Journal of the History of Ideas 46 (1985): 363–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarasohn, Lisa T.French Reaction to the Condemnation of Galileo, 1632–1642.” Catholic Historical Review 74 (1988): 34–54.Google Scholar
Sarasohn, Lisa T.Nicolas-Claude Fabri de Peiresc and the Patronage of the New Science.” Isis 84 (1993), 70–90.Google Scholar
Sarasohn, Lisa T.Gassendi's Ethics: Freedom in a Mechanistic Universe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Charles B. “The Rediscovery of Ancient Skepticism in Modern Times.” In The Sceptical Tradition. Edited by Myles Burnyeat. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.
Schmitt, Charles B.The Aristotelian Tradition and Renaissance Universities. London: Variorum Reprints, 1984.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B.The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Secada, Jorge. Cartesian Metaphysics: The Late Scholastic Origins of Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, David. Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackelford, Joel. “Seeds with a Mechanical Purpose.” In Reading the Book of Nature. Edited by A. G. Debus and M. T. Walton. Kirksville, MO: Sixteenth Century Journal Publishers, 1998.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven, and Schaffer, Simon. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Simmons, Alison. “Explaining Sense Perception: A Scholastic Challenge.” Philosophical Studies 73.2–3 (1994), 257–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorabji, Richard. Time, Creation, and the Continuum: Theories in Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard. Matter, Space, and Motion: Theories in Antiquity and Their Sequel. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Sorrell, Tom. “Seventeenth-Century Materialism: Gassendi and Hobbes.” In The Renaissance and 17th Century Rationalism. Edited by G. H. R. Parkinson. New York: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Sortais, Gaston. La philosophie moderne depuis Bacon jusqu'à Leibniz. 2 volumes. Paris: Paul Lethielleux, 1920–2.Google Scholar
Spink, J. S.French Free-thought from Gassendi to Voltaire. New York: Greenwood Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Thorndike, L.A History Of Magic And Experimental Science. New York: Columbia University Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Vlastos, Gregory. “Minimal Parts in Epicurean Atomism.” Isis 56 (1965), 121–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Ralph. “Gassendi and Skepticism.” In The Sceptical Tradition. Edited by Myles Burnyeat. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.Google Scholar