Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-846f6c7c4f-whwnh Total loading time: 0.675 Render date: 2022-07-06T23:29:41.041Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2020

David Lefkowitz
Affiliation:
University of Richmond
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Philosophy and International Law
A Critical Introduction
, pp. 266 - 274
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Adams, N.P.Institutional Legitimacy,” Journal of Political Philosophy 26, 1 (2018): 84102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alkire, Sabina, et al. “Global Multidimensional Poverty Index 2019: Illuminating Inequalities.” Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (2019). Last accessed December 10, 2019. https://ophi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/G-MPI_Report_2019_PDF.pdf.Google Scholar
Altman, Andrew. “The Persistent Fiction of Harm to Humanity,” Ethics and International Affairs 20, 3 (2006): 367–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, Andrew and Wellman, Christopher Heath. A Liberal Theory of International Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, John. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. London: University of London, 1832.Google Scholar
Bakke, Kristin M. and Wibbels, Erik. “Diversity, Disparity, and Civil Conflict in Federal States,” World Politics 59, 1 (2006): 150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, Christian. “The Regulation of Harm in International Trade: A Critique of James’ Collective Due Care Principle,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44, 2 (2014): 255–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckett, Jason A.The Hartian Tradition in International Law,” Journal of Jurisprudence 1 (2008): 5183.Google Scholar
Beitz, Charles R. The Idea of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, Alex J. and Williams, Paul D.. “On the Limits of Moral Hazard: The Responsibility to Protect, Armed Conflict, and Mass Atrocities,” European Journal of International Relations 18, 3 (2012): 539–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besson, Samantha. “The Authority of International Law: Lifting the State Veil,” Sydney Law Review 31, 3 (2009): 343–80.Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha. “State Consent and Disagreement in International Law-Making: Dissolving the Paradox,” Leiden Journal of International Law 29, 2 (2016): 289316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besson, Samantha. “International Human Rights Law and Mirrors,” ESIL Reflections 7, 2 (2018): 111.Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha. “In What Sense Are Economic Rights Human Rights? Departing from Their Naturalistic Reading in International Human Rights Law.” In Economic Liberties and Human Rights, eds. Queralt, Jahel and van der Vossen, Bas. New York: Routledge, 2019, pp. 4568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bingham, Tom. The Rule of Law. London: Penguin UK, 2010.Google Scholar
Bodansky, Daniel. “Legitimacy in International Law and International Relations.” In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, eds. Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A.. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 321–41.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Allen. Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Allen. The Heart of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Allen. “Secession.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/secession/.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Allen. “Institutional Legitimacy.” In Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy, Volume 4, eds. Sobel, David, Vallentyne, Peter, and Wall, Steven. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018, pp. 5378.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Allen and Keohane, Robert. “The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions,” Ethics and International Affairs 20, 4 (2006): 405–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Allen and Russell, Powell. “Constitutional Democracy and the Rule of International Law: Are they Compatible?Journal of Political Philosophy 16, 3 (2008): 326–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Allen and Sreenivasan, Gopal. “Taking International Legality Seriously: A Methodology for Human Rights.” In Human Rights: Moral or Political?, ed. Etinson, Adam. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018, pp. 211–29.Google Scholar
Capps, Patrick. “International Legal Positivism and Modern Natural Law.” In International Legal Positivism in a Post-Modern World, eds. Kammerhofer, J. and d’Aspremont, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 213–40.Google Scholar
Chehtman, Alejandro. “Contemporary Approaches to the Philosophy of Crimes Against Humanity,” International Criminal Law Review 14, 4–5 (2014): 813–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesterman, Simon. “I’ll Take Manhattan: The International Rule of Law and the UNSC,” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 1 (2009): 6773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, Thomas. The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and Its Limits. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, Thomas. “Democratic Legitimacy and International Institutions.” In The Philosophy of International Law, eds. Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 119–37.Google Scholar
Christiano, Thomas. “Is Democratic Legitimacy Possible for International Institutions?” In Global Democracy: Normative and Empirical Perspectives, eds. Archibugi, Daniele, Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias, and Marchetti, Rafaele. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011, pp. 6995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, Thomas. “Legitimacy and the International Trade Regime,” San Diego Law Review 52, 5 (2015): 9811012.Google Scholar
Christiano, Thomas. “Ronald Dworkin, State Consent, and Progressive Cosmopolitanism.” In The Legacy of Ronald Dworkin, eds. Waluchow, Wil and Sciaraffa, Stefan. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 4969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G.A. Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jean L.The Uses and Limits of Legalism: On Patrick Macklem’s The Sovereignty of Human Rights,” University of Toronto Law Journal 67, 4 (2017): 512–43.Google Scholar
Collins, Richard. The Institutional Problem in Modern International Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2016.Google Scholar
Cotterrell, Roger. “What Is Transnational Law?,” Law and Social Inquiry 37, 2 (2012): 500–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craven, Matthew. “Statehood.” In International Law, 4th Edition, ed. Evans., Malcolm D. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, pp. 201–47.Google Scholar
Crawford, James. “International Law and the Rule of Law,” Adelaide Law Review 24, 1 (2003): 312.Google Scholar
Dagger, Richard. Civic Virtues: Rights, Citizenship, and Republican Liberalism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Dagger, Richard. Playing Fair: Political Obligation and the Problems of Punishment. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d’Aspremont, Jean. Formalism and the Sources of International Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dill, Janina and Shue, Henry. “Limiting the Killing in War: Military Necessity and the St. Petersburg Assumption,” Ethics and International Affairs 26, 3 (2012): 311–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R.A. Punishment, Communication, and Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Duff, R.A. Answering for Crime: Responsibility and Liability in the Criminal Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007.Google Scholar
Duff, R.A.Authority and Responsibility in International Criminal Law.” In The Philosophy of International Law, eds. Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 589604.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. “Model of Rules I.” In Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. “What Is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 10, 3 (1981): 185246.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. “What Is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 10, 4 (1981): 283345.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. A Matter of Principle, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Law’s Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Justice in Robes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. “A New Philosophy for International Law,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 41, 1 (2013): 230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erman, Eva. “Global Political Legitimacy Beyond Justice and Democracy,” International Theory 8, 1 (2016): 2962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estlund, David. Democratic Authority. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Finnis, John. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L.Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart,” Harvard Law Review 71, 4 (1958): 630–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. The Morality of Law, rev. ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. The Principles of Social Order: Selected Essays of Lon L. Fuller, ed. Winston, Kenneth I.. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Garcia, Frank J. Global Justice and International Economic Law: Three Takes. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Stephen. “A Core Precautionary Principle,” Journal of Political Philosophy 14, no. 1 (2006): 3360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghoshal, Neela and Knight, Kyle, “Rights in Transition: Making Legal Recognition for Transgender People a Global Priority,” last modified 2016, available at www.hrw.org/world-report/2016/rights-in-transition.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, Robert. “Exploiting a Situation and Exploiting a Person,” in Modern Theories of Exploitation, ed. Reeve, A. (London: Sage, 1987), pp. 166200.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert. Reflective Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H.L.A.Are There Any Natural Rights?Philosophical Review 64, 2 (1955): 175–91.Google Scholar
Hart, H.L.A. The Concept of Law, 3rd Edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haque, Adil Ahman. “Law and Morality at War,” Criminal Law and Philosophy 8, 1 (2014): 7997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haque, Adil Ahman Law and Morality at War. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, Oona and Shapiro, Scott J.. “Outcasting: Enforcement in Domestic and International Law,” Yale L.J. 121 (2011): 252349.Google Scholar
Hausman, Daniel M. and McPherson, Michael S.. Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy, and Public Policy, 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henkin, Louis. How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy, 2nd Edition. New York: Columbia University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn. “The ICJ and the Rule of Law,” speech delivered at the United Nations University, April 11, 2007, http://archive.unu.edu/events/files/2007/20070411_Higgins_speech.pdf (last visited October 25, 2019).Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald. “A Right to Secede?” In Secession and Self-Determination, NOMOS XLV, eds. Macedo, Stephen and Buchanan, Allen. New York: New York University Press, 2003, pp. 5076.Google Scholar
Ignatieff, Michael. “Enemies vs. Adversaries.” New York Times, October 16, 2013, www.nytimes.com/2013/10/17/opinion/enemies-vs-adversaries.html (last accessed December 11, 2019).Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross. “Law and War.” www.icrc.org/en/war-and-law (last accessed January 10, 2020).Google Scholar
James, Aaron. Fairness in Practice: A Social Contract for a Global Economy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Aaron. “Reply to Critics,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44, 2 (2014): 286304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Aaron. “A Theory of Fairness in Trade,” Moral Philosophy and Politics 1, 2 (2014): 177200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemoklidze, Nino. “The Kosovo Precedent and the ‘Moral Hazard’ of Secession,” Journal of International Law and International Relations 5, 2 (2009): 117–40.Google Scholar
Kleinfeld, Joshua. “Skeptical Internationalism: A Study of Whether International Law Is Law,” Fordham Law Review 78 5 (2010): 2452–530.Google Scholar
Klosko, George. The Principle of Fairness and Political Obligation. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1992.Google Scholar
Kumm, Mattias. “The Legitimacy of International Law: A Constitutionalist Framework of Analysis,” European Journal of International Law 15, 5 (2004): 907–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuperman, Alan J.The Moral Hazard of Humanitarian Intervention: Lessons from the Balkans,” International Studies Quarterly 52, 1 (2008): 4980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafont, Cristina. “Should We Take the ‘Human’ Out of Human Rights? Human Dignity in a Corporate World,” Ethics and International Affairs 30, 2 (2016): 233–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamond, Grant. “The Rule of Law.” In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Law, ed. Marmor, Andrei. New York: Routledge, 2012, pp. 495507.Google Scholar
Lazar, Seth. “The Morality and Law of War.” In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Law, ed. Marmor, Andrei. New York: Routledge, 2012, pp. 364–79.Google Scholar
Lee, Win-Chiat. “The Judgeship of All Citizens: Dworkin’s Protestantism About Law,” Law and Philosophy 34, 1 (January 2015): 2353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz, David. “The Principle of Fairness and States’ Duty to Obey International Law,” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 24, no. 2 (2011): 327–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz, David. “Sources in Legal Positivist Theories: Law as Necessarily Posited and the Challenge of Customary Law Formation.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Sources of International Law, eds. Besson, Samantha and d’Aspremont, Jean. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, pp. 323–42.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, David. “International Law, Institutional Moral Reasoning, and Secession,” Law and Philosophy 37, 4 (2018): 385413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz, David. “A New Philosophy for International Legal Skepticism?” Draft on file with author.Google Scholar
Leiter, Brian. “Explaining Theoretical Disagreement,” 76 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1215 (2009).Google Scholar
Lister, Matthew. “The Legitimating Role of Consent in International Law,” Chicago Journal of International Law 11, 2 (2011): 664–91.Google Scholar
Luban, David. “Natural Law as Professional Ethics: A Reading of Fuller,” Social Philosophy and Policy 18, 1 (Winter 2001): 176205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luban, David. “A Theory of Crimes Against Humanity,” Yale Journal of International Law 29, 1 (2004): 85167.Google Scholar
Luban, David. Luban, David. “Fairness to Rightness: Jurisdiction, Legality, and the Legitimacy of the International Criminal Court.” In The Philosophy of International Law, eds. Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 569–88.Google Scholar
Luban, David. “Human Rights Pragmatism and Human Dignity.” In Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights, eds. Rowan Cruft, S. Liao, Matthew, and Renzo, Massimo. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 263–78.Google Scholar
Ma, Xuechan and Guo, Shaui. “An Empirical Study of the Voting Patterns of Judges of the International Court of Justice (2005–2016),” Erasmus Law Review 10, 3. (2017): 163–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmor, Andrei. Philosophy of Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, Larry. Crimes Against Humanity: A Normative Account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, Larry. “Humanity, International Crime, and the Rights of Defendants,” Ethics and International Affairs 20, 3 (2006): 373–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahan, Jeff. “The Ethics of Killing in War,” Philosophia 34, 1 (2006): 2341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahan, Jeff. “The Morality of War and the Law of War.” In Just and Unjust Warriors, eds. Rodin, David and Shue, Henry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 1943.Google Scholar
Meisels, Tamar. “In Defense of the Defenseless: The Morality of the Laws of War,” Political Studies 60, 4 (2012): 919–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, David. “Secession and the Principle of Nationality.” In National Self-Determination and Secession, ed. Moore, Margaret. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998, pp. 6278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, David. National Responsibility and Global Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Miller, David. “Nationalism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory, eds. Dryzek, John S., Honig, Bonnie, and Phillips, Anne. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, 529–45.Google Scholar
Miller, David. “Territorial Rights: Concept and Justification,” Political Studies 60, 2 (2012): 252–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, David. “Joseph Raz on Human Rights: A Skeptical Appraisal.” In Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights, eds. Rowan Cruft, S. Liao, Matthew, and Renzo, Massimo. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 232–43.Google Scholar
Miscevic, Nenad. “Nationalism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/nationalism/.Google Scholar
Moore, Margaret. “The Ethics of Secession and a Normative Theory of Nationalism,” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence XIII, 2 (July 2000): 225–50.Google Scholar
Moore, Margaret. A Political Theory of Territory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso, 2000.Google Scholar
Murphy, Liam. What Makes Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickel, James. “Human Rights.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/rights-human/.Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, André. National Courts and the International Rule of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, Wayne. “Ethics of Secession as the Regulation of Secessionist Politics.” In National Self-Determination and Secession, ed. Moore, Margaret. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998, pp. 3461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozick, Robert. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books, 1974.Google Scholar
Owens, David. “In Loco Civitatis: On the Normative Basis of the Institution of Refugeehood and Responsibilities for Refugees.” In Migration in Political Theory: The Ethics of Movement and Membership, eds. Fine, Sarah and Ypi, Lea. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 269–90.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost. “Enforcement and Countermeasures in the WTO: Rules Are Rules – Toward a More Collective Approach,” American Journal of International Law 94, 2 (2000): 335–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavel, Carmen. Divided Sovereignty: International Institutions and the Limits of State Authority. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Pavel, Carmen. “Is International Law a Hartian Legal System?Ratio Juris 31, 3 (2018): 307–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavel, Carmen and Lefkowitz, David. “International Legal Skepticism,” Philosophy Compass, 13, 8 (2018): 114.Google Scholar
Payandeh, Mehrdad. “The Concept of International Law in the Jurisprudence of H.L.A. Hart,” European Journal of International Law 21, 4 (2011): 967–95.Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas. World Poverty and Human Rights. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Posner, Eric A. and Yoo, John C., “Judicial Independence in International Tribunals,” California Law Review 93, 1 (January 2005): 374.Google Scholar
Postema, Gerald. “Custom, Normative Practice, and the Law,” Duke Law Journal 62, 3 (2012): 707–38.Google Scholar
Ratner, Steven R. The Thin Justice of International Law: A Moral Reckoning of the Law of Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. The Authority of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. “The Problem of Authority: Revisiting the Service Conception,” Minnesota Law Review 90, 4 (2006): 10031044.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. “Human Rights Without Foundations.” In The Philosophy of International Law, eds. Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 321–37.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. “Human Rights in the Emerging World Order.” In Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights, eds. Rowan Cruft, S. Liao, Matthew, and Renzo, Massimo. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 217–31.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. “On Waldron’s Critique of Raz on Human Rights.” In Human Rights: Moral or Political?, ed. Etinson, Adam. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018, pp. 139–43.Google Scholar
Reeves, Anthony R.Liability to International Prosecution: The Nature of Universal Jurisdiction,” European Journal of International Law 28, 4 (2017): 1047–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, Donald. Utilitarianism and Cooperation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, Arie. “The Effectiveness of the WTO Dispute Settlement System: A Statistical Analysis,” European University Institute Working Papers, 2017, https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/47045/LAW_2017_11.pdf?sequence=1 (last accessed December 10, 2019).Google Scholar
Renzo, Massimo. “A Criticism of the International Harm Principle,” Criminal Law and Philosophy 4, 3 (2010): 267–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renzo, Massimo. “Crimes Against Humanity and the Limits of International Criminal Law,” Law and Philosophy 31, 4 (2012): 443–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Mathias and Wollner, Gabriel. “Critical Notice of Aaron James, Fairness in Practice: A Social Contract for a Global Economy,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43, 3 (2013): 382401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Mathias and Wollner, GabrielThree Images of Trade: On the Place of Trade in a Theory of Global Justice,” Moral Philosophy and Politics 1, 2 (2014): 201–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodin, David. “Morality and Law in War.” In The Changing Character of War, eds. Strachan, Hew and Scheipers, Sibylle. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 446–63.Google Scholar
Sambanis, Nicholas and Schulhofer-Wohl, Jonah, “What’s in a Line?International Security 34, 2 (2009): 82118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Warren F. and Sykes, Alan O.. “The Economic Structure of Renegotiation and Dispute Resolution in the World Trade Organization,” Journal of Legal Studies 31, 1 – Part 2 (January 2002): S179S204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shue, Henry. “Do We Need a ‘Morality of War?’” In Just and Unjust Warriors, eds. Rodin, David and Shue, Henry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 87111.Google Scholar
Shue, Henry. “Laws of War, Morality, and International Politics: Compliance, Stringency, and Limits,” Leiden Journal of International Law 26, 2 (2013): 271–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, A. John. Justification and Legitimacy: Essays on Rights and Obligations. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Sirosky, David S.Explaining Secession.” In The Ashgate Research Companion to Secession, eds. Pavkovic, Aleksander and Radan, Peter. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing, 2011, pp. 4579.Google Scholar
Sloss, David L. and Van Alstine, Michael P.. “International Law in Domestic Courts.” In Research Handbook on the Politics of International Law, eds. Sandholtz, Wayne and Whytock, Christopher A.. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishers, 2017, pp. 79115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, Hillel. “Exploitation: A Liberal Theory Amended, Defended, and Extended.” In Modern Theories of Exploitation, ed. Reeve, A.. London: Sage, 1987, pp. 132–48.Google Scholar
Stilz, Anna. Territorial Sovereignty: A Philosophical Exploration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian. “A Concise Guide to the Rule of Law.” In Relocating the Rule of Law, eds. Palombella, Gianluigi and Walker, Neil. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2009, pp. 316.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian. “The History and Elements of the Rule of Law,” Singapore Journal of Legal Studies (December 2012): 232–47.Google Scholar
Tasioulas, John. “The Legitimacy of International Law.” In The Philosophy of International Law, eds. Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 97116.Google Scholar
Tasioulas, John. “On the Nature of Human Rights.” In The Philosophy of Human Rights: Contemporary Controversies, eds. Ernst, Gerhard and Heilinger, Jan-Christoph. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2011, pp. 1759.Google Scholar
Tasioulas, John. “Exiting the Hall of Mirrors: Morality and Law in Human Rights.” In Political and Legal Approaches to Human Rights, eds. Campbell, Tom and Bourne, Kylie. London, Routledge, 2017, pp. 7389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teson, Fernando R.Why Free Trade Is Required by Justice,” Social Philosophy and Policy 29, 1 (2012): 126–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurer, Daniel and Burri, Thomas. “Secession.” In The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, ed. Wolfrum, Rudiger. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Van der Borght, Kim. “Justice for All in the Dispute Settlement System of the World Trade Organization?Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 39, 3 (2011): 787806.Google Scholar
Vernon, Richard. “What Is Crime Against Humanity?Journal of Political Philosophy 10, 3 (2002): 231–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernon, Richard. “Crime Against Humanity: A Defense of the ‘Subsidiarity’ View,” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 26, 1 (2013): 229–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. “The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review,” Yale Law Journal 115, 6 (April 2006): 1346–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. “The Rule of International Law,” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 30, 1 (Fall 2006): 1530.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. “The Concept and the Rule of Law,” Georgia Law Review 43, 1 (Fall 2008): 361.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. “International Law: ‘A Relatively Small and Unimportant’ Part of Jurisprudence?” In Reading HLA Hart’s “The Concept of Law,” eds. Duarte d’Almeida, L., Edwards, J., and Dolcetti, A.. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013, pp. 209–26.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. “The Rule of Law.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/rule-of-law/.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. Just and Unjust Wars, 5th Edition. New York: Basic Books, 2015.Google Scholar
Watts, Arthur. “The International Rule of Law,” German Yearbook of International Law 36 (1993): 1545.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. “Politics as Vocation.” In Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, eds. Gerth, H.H. and Wright Mills, C.. New York: Oxford University Press, 1946, pp. 248.Google Scholar
Wellman, Christopher. “The Morality of Secession.” In Secession as an International Phenomenon: From America’s Civil War to Contemporary Separatist Movements, ed. Doyle, Dan H.. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 2010, pp. 1936.Google Scholar
Wenar, Leif. Blood Oil: Tyrants, Violence, and the Rules that Run the World. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization. “Understanding the WTO: Settling Disputes.” Last accessed December 10, 2019, www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/disp1_e.htm.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Andreas. “Times Are Changing – and What About the International Rule of Law Then?” www.ejiltalk.org/times-are-changing-and-what-about-the-international-rule-of-law-then/ (published March 5, 2018; last accessed October 25, 2019).Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Factory at Chorzow (Germ. v. Pol.), 1927 P.C.I.J. (ser. A) No. 9 (July 26).Google Scholar
Riggs v. Palmer, 115 NY 506, 22 N.E. 188 (1889).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, December 16, 1966, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 999, p. 171, available at https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/unts/volume%20999/volume-999-i-14668-english.pdf.Google Scholar
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, December 16, 1966, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 993, p. 3, available at https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%20993/v993.pdf.Google Scholar
International Law Commission, Report on the Work of Its Sixty-Ninth Session, UN Doc. A/72/10 (September 11, 2017), available at https://legal.un.org/ilc/reports/2017/.Google Scholar
United Nations Human Rights Council, Protection Against Violence and Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity: Resolution/Adopted by the Human Rights Council, July 15, 2016, A/HRC/RES/32/2, available at https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/845552?ln=en.Google Scholar
United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), Born Free and Equal: Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in International Human Rights Law, September 2012, HR/PUB/12/06, available at www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/BornFreeAndEqualLowRes.pdf.Google Scholar
United Nations, Charter of the United Nations, October 24, 1945, 1 UNTS XVI.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly, Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, July 28, 1951, United Nations Treaty Series, vol. 189, p. 137.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly Seventeenth Session, Resolution No. A/RES/1803/(XVII), December 14, 1962.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly, Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, January 31, 1967, United Nations Treaty Series, vol. 606, p. 267.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly, 2005 World Summit Outcome Document, “A Responsibility to Protect,” A/RES/60/1, available at www.globalr2p.org/media/files/wsod_2005.pdf (accessed December 18, 2019).Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly resolution 67/97, The Rule of Law at the National and International Levels, A/RES/67/97 (December 14, 2012).Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council, The Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies: Report of the Secretary-General, August 23, 2004, UN Doc. S/2004/616.Google Scholar
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, December 10, 1948, 217 A (III), available at www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • David Lefkowitz, University of Richmond
  • Book: Philosophy and International Law
  • Online publication: 10 October 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316481653.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • David Lefkowitz, University of Richmond
  • Book: Philosophy and International Law
  • Online publication: 10 October 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316481653.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • David Lefkowitz, University of Richmond
  • Book: Philosophy and International Law
  • Online publication: 10 October 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316481653.012
Available formats
×