Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-56f9d74cfd-s5lbf Total loading time: 0.407 Render date: 2022-06-26T05:51:15.963Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

24 - Principles-based, risk-based regulation and effective enforcement

from PART II - Perspectives in financial regulation, SECTION 1: European perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Michel Tison
Affiliation:
Universiteit Gent, Belgium
Hans De Wulf
Affiliation:
Universiteit Gent, Belgium
Christoph Van der Elst
Affiliation:
Universiteit Gent, Belgium
Reinhard Steennot
Affiliation:
Universiteit Gent, Belgium
Get access

Summary

Enforcement intensity may impinge on capital market competitiveness. It also has implications for the development of international securities regulation, which is increasingly likely to depend on determinations of equivalence as between different national (or regional) regimes.

The UK Financial Services Authority is not enforcement-led and, in tune with its principles-based, risk-based approach, it employs a range of compliance-promoting strategies. Its measured approach to enforcement divides opinion and particular controversy surrounds its application in relation to market abuse. This chapter reviews the Financial Services Authority's enforcement record in this difficult area and identifies challenges that lie ahead.

What does principles-based, risk-based regulation mean?

The essence of the distinction between rules and principles lies in their specificity. At opposite ends of the spectrum lie: a ‘rule’ which is written in such detailed and precise terms that all questions about what conduct is permissible are settled in advance leaving only factual issues for later judgment; and a ‘principle’ (or ‘standard’) written in open-textured language that leaves open both specification of what conduct is permissible and judgment on factual issues. Many, if not most, regulatory requirements will occupy the space between these endpoints showing more (or less) of the characteristics of a rule (or principle), being as Cunningham has put it, ‘hybrids along a continuum’. The combination of principles, rules and all points in between within a legal system can, in jurisprudential terms, be seen as a compromise between two social needs: ‘the need for certain rules which can, over great areas of conduct, safely be applied by private individuals to themselves without fresh official guidance or weighing up of social issues, and the need to leave open, for later settlement by an informed, official choice, issues which can only be properly appreciated and settled when they arise in a concrete case’.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Braithwaite, J.B., ‘Rules and Principles: A Theory of Legal Certainty’, Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, 27 (2002), 47–82Google Scholar
Schauer, F., ‘Prescriptions In Three Dimensions’, Iowa Law Review, 82 (1997), 911–22Google Scholar
Schauer, F., Playing By The Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule Based Decision Making in Law and Life (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Kennedy, D., ‘Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication’, Harvard Law Review, 89 (1976), 1685–1778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, L. and Kress, K., ‘Against Legal Principles’ in Marmor, A. (ed.), Law and Interpretation: Essays in Legal Philosophy (OUP, 1995), 279, reprinted in Iowa Law Review, 82 (1997), 739–86Google Scholar
Raz, J., ‘Legal Principles and the Limits of Law’, Yale Law Journal, 81 (1972), 823–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R., Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977), 22–3.Google Scholar
Kaplow, L., ‘Rules Versus Standards: An Economic Analysis’, Duke Law Journal, 42 (1992), 557–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, L., ‘A Prescription to Retire The Rhetoric Of “Principles-Based Systems”‘ in ‘Corporate Law, Securities Regulation, and Accounting’, Vanderbilt Law Review, 60 (2007), 1411–1493, at 1492.Google Scholar
Hart, H.L.A., The Concept of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961), 127.Google Scholar
Ford, C.L., ‘New Governance, Compliance, and Principles-Based Securities Regulation’, American Business Law Journal, 45 (2008), 1–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J., Hopper, M. and Band, C., ‘Making a Success of Principles-based Regulation’, Law and Financial Market Review, 1(3) (2007), 191–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiner, J., ‘Chief Executive's Report’, FSA Annual Report (2006/7).Google Scholar
Baldwin, R. and Black, J., ‘Really Responsive Regulation’, Modern Law Review, 71 (2008), 59–94, at 65–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,‘The Five Principles of Good Regulation’, Annex B to Better Regulation Task Force, Regulation – Less is More: Reducing Burdens, Improving Outcomes (2005).Google Scholar
Grant, J., ‘Bernanke Calls for US to Follow UK's “Principles-based” Approach’, Financial Times, 16 May 2007, 1.Google Scholar
Nakamoto, M., ‘Tokyo Eyes Move Towards UK-style Financial Regulation’, Financial Times, 25 October 2007, 7.Google Scholar
Bebchuk, L.A., ‘The Myth of the Shareholder Franchise’, Virginia Law Review, 93 (2007), 675–732Google Scholar
Gunningham, N. and Grabosky, P., Smart Regulation (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Coffee, J.C., ‘Law and the Market: The Impact of Enforcement’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 156 (2007), 229–311.Google Scholar
MacNeil, I., ‘The Evolution of Regulatory Enforcement Action in the UK Capital Markets: A Case of “Less is More”?’, Capital Markets Law Journal 2(4) (2007), 345–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, R., ‘Why Rules Don't Work’, Modern Law Review, 53 (1990), 321–37, at 328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, M. and Stainsby, J., ‘Principles-based Regulation – Better Regulation?’, Journal of International Banking Law and Regulation, 21 (2006), 387–91Google Scholar
Karmel, R.S., Regulation by Prosecution: The Securities and Exchange Commission Versus Corporate America (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1982)Google Scholar
Pitt, H.L. and Shapiro, K.L., ‘Securities Regulation by Enforcement: A Look Ahead at the Next Decade’, Yale Journal on Regulation 7 (1990), 149–304.Google Scholar
Park, J.J., ‘The Competing Paradigms of Securities Regulation’, Duke Law Journal, 57 (2007), 625–89.Google Scholar
Mayhew, D. and Anderson, K., ‘Whither Market Abuse (in a More Principles-based Regulatory World)?’, Journal of International Banking Law and Regulation, 22(10) (2007), 515–31.Google Scholar
Hopper, M. and Stainsby, J., ‘Measuring Market Abuse: Cleaning Up?’, Practical Law for Companies, 17(4) (2006), 6–7.Google Scholar
Quinn, J., ‘Insider Trading Hits One in Four Deals’, Daily Telegraph, 8 March 2007, 1 (City section)Google Scholar
Kim, V. and Masters, B., ‘ “Suspicious Trading” Ahead of 49% of North American Deals’, Financial Times, 6 August 2007, 19.Google Scholar
McBarnet, D., ‘After Enron Will “Whiter than White Collar Crime” Still Wash?’, British Journal of Criminology, 46 (2006), 1091–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcock, A., ‘Five Years of Market Abuse’, Company Lawyer, 28 (2007), 163–71Google Scholar
Brickey, K.F., ‘Enron's Legacy’, Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 8 (2004), 221–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conceicao, C., ‘The FSA's Approach to Taking Action Against Market Abuse’, Company Lawyer, 28 (2007), 43–45.Google Scholar
Burger, R. and King, E., ‘An Inside Job?’, New Law Journal, 158 (2008), 390.Google Scholar
Conceicao, C., Hugger, H. and Riolo, S., ‘Deciphering the FSA's Declining Caseload’, European Lawyer, 73 (2007), 10–11.Google Scholar
Saigol, L. and Larsen, P.T., ‘FSA Boss Admits Defeat’, Financial Times, 3 July 2007, 18Google Scholar
Saigol, L., ‘City Must Join Insider Trading Fight’, Financial Times, 23 April 2007, 19.Google Scholar
Hart, A., ‘Paul Davidson and Ashley Tatham v FSA [2006] – The Case and its Implications’, Journal of International Banking Law and Regulation, 22 (2007), 288–92Google Scholar
Band, C. and Hopper, M., ‘Market Abuse: A Developing Jurisprudence’, Journal of International Banking Law and Regulation, 22 (2007), 231–9.Google Scholar
Dewar, S., ‘Market Abuse Policy and Enforcement in the UK’: speech by FSA Director of Markets Division, BBA and ABI Market Abuse Seminar, 22 May 2007. Text available at www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Communication/Speeches/2007/0522_sd.shtml (accessed March 2008).Google Scholar
Whittaker, A.M., ‘Better Regulation – Principles vs. Rules’, Journal of International Banking Law and Regulation, 21 (2006), 233–7.Google Scholar
Band, C. and Anderson, K., ‘Conflicts of Interest in Financial Services and Markets. The Regulatory Aspect’, Journal of International Banking Law and Regulation, 22 (2007), 88–100.Google Scholar
Black, J, Rules and Regulators (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patient, J., ‘Treating Customers Fairly: the Challenges of Principles Based Regulation’, Journal of International Banking Law and Regulation, 22 (2007), 420–25Google Scholar
1
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×