Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T17:37:00.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 10 - Late Effects of Childhood Cancer in Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2018

Sarah M. Creighton
University College Hospital, London
Adam Balen
University of Leeds
Lesley Breech
Cincinnati Children’s Hospital
Lih-Mei Liao
University College Hospital, London
Get access


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
A Problem-Based Approach
, pp. 132 - 140
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


American Cancer Society. Cancer Treatment & Survivorship Facts & Figures 2016–2017. 2016.Google Scholar
Children’s Oncology Group. Long-term follow-up guidelines for survivors of childhood, adolescent and young adult cancers. 2014; Version 4.0, available from: Scholar
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Long term follow up of survivors of childhood cancer [SIGN132]. 2013.Google Scholar
Lee, S.J., Schover, L.R., Partridge, A.H. et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol, 2006; 24(18): 2917–31.Google Scholar
Chemaitilly, W., Mertens, A.C., Mitby, P. et al. Acute ovarian failure in the childhood cancer survivor study. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2006; 91(5): 1723–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sklar, C.A., Mertens, A.C., Mitby, P. et al. Premature menopause in survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2006; 98(13): 890–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lantinga, G.M., Simons, A.H., Kamps, W.A. et al. Imminent ovarian failure in childhood cancer survivors. Eur J Cancer, 2006; 42(10): 1415–20.Google Scholar
Rocca, W.A., Grossardt, B.R., Shuster, L.T. Oophorectomy, estrogen, and dementia: a 2014 update. Mol Cell Endocrinol, 2014; 389(1–2): 712.Google Scholar
Shuster, L.T., Rhodes, D. J., Gostout, B.S. et al., Premature menopause or early menopause: long-term health consequences. Maturitas, 2010; 65(2): 161–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, W.H.B., Anderson, R.A., Irvine, D.A. Fertility preservation for young patients with cancer. Who is at risk and what can be offered? Lancet Oncology, 2005; 6(12): 922.Google Scholar
Green, DM, Nolan, VG, Goodman, PJ, Whitton, JA, Srivastava, D, Leisenring, WM, et al. The cyclophosphamide equivalent dose as an approach for quantifying alkylating agent exposure: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2014; 61(1): 5367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakayama, K., et al., Gonadal failure after treatment of hematologic malignancies: from recognition to management for health-care providers. Nat Clin Pract Oncol, 2008; 5(2): 7889.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, W.H.B., et al., Predicting age of ovarian failure after radiation to a field that includes the ovaries. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 2005; 62(3): 738–44.Google Scholar
Gao, W., Liang, J.X., Yan, Q. Exposure to radiation therapy is associated with female reproductive health among childhood cancer survivors: a meta-analysis study. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2015; 32(8): 1179–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsen, EC, Muller, J, Rechnitzer, C, Schmiegelow, K and Andersen, AN. Diminished ovarian reserve in female childhood cancer survivors with regular menstrual cycles and basal FSH <10 IU/I. Human Reproduction, 2003; 18: 417–22.Google Scholar
Lukaszuk, K., et al., Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) is a strong predictor of live birth in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology. Reprod Biol, 2014; 14(3): 176–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broer, S.L., Eijkemans, M.J., Scheffer, G.J. et al., Anti-mullerian hormone predicts menopause: a long-term follow-up study in normoovulatory women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2011; 96(8): 2532–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tehrani, F.R., Shakeri, N., Solaymani-Dodaran, M. et al., Predicting age at menopause from serum antimullerian hormone concentration. Menopause, 2011; 18(7): 766–70.Google Scholar
Benson, R.C., Ovarian tumors in childhood and adolescence. Postgrad Med, 1971; 50(5): 230–35.Google Scholar
Magne, N., Haie-Meder, C. Brachytherapy for genital-tract rhabdomyosarcomas in girls: technical aspects, reports, and perspectives. Lancet Oncol, 2007; 8(8): 725–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerbaulet, A.P., et al., Conservative treatment for lower gynecological tract malignancies in children and adolescents: the Institut Gustave-Roussy experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1989; 17(3): 655–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flamant, F., et al., Long-term sequelae of conservative treatment by surgery, brachytherapy, and chemotherapy for vulval and vaginal rhabdomyosarcoma in children. J Clin Oncol, 1990; 8(11): 1847–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, A., et al., Late toxicity of brachytherapy after female genital tract tumors treated during childhood: prospective evaluation with a long-term follow-up. Radiother Oncol, 2015; 117(2): 206–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loren, A.W., et al., Fertility preservation for patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol, 2013; 31(19): 2500–10.Google Scholar
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertility preservation and reproduction in patients facing gonadotoxic therapies: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril, 2013; 100: 1224–31.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Royal College of Physicians, and Royal College of Radiologists. Effects of cancer treatment on reproductive functions, 2007.Google Scholar
Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society. Fertility Preservation In Reproductive Age Woman Facing Gonadotoxic Treatments, 2014.Google Scholar
Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertility preservation in patients undergoing gonadotoxic therapy or gonadectomy: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril, 2013; 100(5): 1214–23.Google Scholar
Oktay, K., Bedoschi, G. Oocyte cryopreservation for fertility preservation in postpubertal female children at risk for premature ovarian failure due to accelerated follicle loss in Turner syndrome or cancer treatments. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol, 2014; 27(6): 342–46.Google Scholar
Bahadur, G., Spoudeas, H.A., Davies, M.C., Ralph, D. Factors affecting sperm banking for adolescent cancer patients. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2006; 91: 715–16.Google Scholar
Babayev, S.N. et al., Evaluation of ovarian and testicular tissue cryopreservation in children undergoing gonadotoxic therapies. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2013; 30(1): 39.Google Scholar
Donnez, J., et al., Restoration of ovarian activity and pregnancy after transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue: a review of 60 cases of reimplantation. Fertil Steril, 2013; 99(6): 1503–13.Google Scholar
Meirow, D., Ra’anani, H., Biderman, H. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation: a realistic, effective technology for fertility preservation. Methods Mol Biol, 2014; 1154: 455–73.Google Scholar
Demeestere, I., et al., Live birth after autograft of ovarian tissue cryopreserved during childhood. Hum Reprod, 2015; 30(9): 2107–9.Google Scholar
Jensen, A.K. et al., Outcomes of transplantations of cryopreserved ovarian tissue to 41 women in Denmark. Hum Reprod, 2015; 30(12): 2838–45.Google Scholar
Irtan, S., Orbach, D., Helfre, S., Sarnacki, S. Ovarian transposition in prepubescent and adolescent girls with cancer. Lancet Oncol, 2013; 14(13): e6018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quinn, G.P., Vadaparampil, S.T., Lee, J.H. et al., Physician referral for fertility preservation in oncology patients: a national study of practice behaviors. J Clin Oncol, 2009; 27(35): 5952–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niemasik, E.E., et al., Patient perceptions of reproductive health counseling at the time of cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study of female California cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv, 2012; 6(3): 324–32.Google Scholar
Ehrbar, V., et al., Decision-making about fertility preservation-qualitative data on young cancer patients’ attitudes and needs. Arch Womens Ment Health, 2016; 19(4): 695–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J., Mersereau, J.E. Early referral makes the decision-making about fertility preservation easier: a pilot survey study of young female cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer, 2015; 23(6): 1663–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quinn, G.P., et al., Who decides? Decision making and fertility preservation in teens with cancer: a review of the literature. J Adolesc Health, 2011; 49(4): 337–46.Google Scholar
Moore, H.C., et al., Goserelin for ovarian protection during breast-cancer adjuvant chemotherapy. N Engl J Med, 2015; 372(10): 923–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, J.S., Buie, L.W., Woodis, C.B. Management of menorrhagia associated with chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia in women with hematologic malignancy. Pharmacotherapy, 2011; 31(11): 1092–110.Google Scholar
DiVasta, A.D., Laufer, M.R., Gordon, C.M. Bone density in adolescents treated with a GnRH agonist and add-back therapy for endometriosis. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 2007; 20(5): 293–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee Opinion no. 450. Increasing use of contraceptive implants and intrauterine devices to reduce unintended pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol, 2009; 114(6): 1434–38.Google Scholar
Webber, L, Davies, M, Anderson, R, Bartlett, J, Braat, D, Cartwright, B et al. ESHRE guideline: management of women with premature ovarian insufficiency. Human Reproduction 2016; 31(5): 926–37.Google ScholarPubMed
Bondy, C.A., Turner Syndrome Study Group. Care of girls and women with Turner syndrome: a guideline of the Turner Syndrome Study Group. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2007; 92(1): 1025.Google Scholar
Crofton, PM, Evans, N, Bath, LE, Warner, P, Whitehead, TJ, Critchley, HOD et al. Physiological versus standard sex steroid replacement in young women with premature ovarian failure: effects on bone mass acquisition and turnover. Clinical Endocrinology 2010; 73(6): 707714.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats