Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-7mfl8 Total loading time: 0.746 Render date: 2021-11-27T00:59:19.886Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2013

Christian Coons
Affiliation:
Bowling Green State University, Ohio
Michael Weber
Affiliation:
Bowling Green State University, Ohio
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Paternalism
Theory and Practice
, pp. 266 - 280
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, M. D., and Posner, E. A.. New Foundations of Cost–Benefit Analysis. Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Adler, M. D., and Posner, E. A., eds. Cost–Benefit Analysis: Economic, Philosophical, and Legal Perspectives. University of Chicago Press Journals, 2001.Google Scholar
AETNA. “Aetna Announces New Weight Management Program at National Summit on Obesity,” June 3, 2004. .
Alexandrova, A., and Haybron, D. M.. “High-Fidelity Economics.” In Hands, W. H. and Davis, J. B., eds., The Elgar Companion to Recent Economic Methodology. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2012, 94–120.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. S. Value in Ethics and Economics. Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. S. “What Is the Point of Equality?”Ethics 109 (1999): 287–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
André-Bechely, L. Could It Be Otherwise?: Parents and the Inequalities of Public School Choice. London: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
ANES. “ANES Guide to Public Opinion and Electoral Behavior: Government Guaranteed Job/Standard of Living (1) 1956–2002,” 2005. .
Angner, E.“Economists as Experts: Overconfidence in Theory and Practice.”Journal of Economic Methodology 13 (2006): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M.“Modern Moral Philosophy.”Philosophy 33 (1958): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariely, D., and Wertenbroch, K.. “Procrastination, Deadlines, and Performance: Self-Control by Precommitment.”Psychological Science 13 (2002): 219–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, R. J.“Joel Feinberg and the Justification of Hard Paternalism.”Legal Theory 11 (2005): 259–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, R. J.“Mill Versus Paternalism.”Ethics 90 (1980): 470–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, R. J.“Paternalism, Utility, and Fairness.” In Dworkin, G., ed., Mill’s On Liberty: Critical Essays. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1997, 83–114.Google Scholar
Arneson, R. J.“Perfectionism and Politics.”Ethics 111 (2000): 37–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, R. J.“The Principle of Fairness and Free-Rider Problems.”Ethics 92 (1982): 616–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, R. J.“What, If Anything, Renders All Humans Morally Equal?” In Jameson, D., ed., Singer and His Critics. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999, 103–128.Google Scholar
Baron, J., and Spranca, M. D.. “Protected Values.”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 70 (1997): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron, M.“Manipulativeness.”Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 77 (2003): 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, R. A.Essentials of Psychology. 3rd edn. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 2001.Google Scholar
Barrotta, P.“Why Economists Should Be Unhappy with the Economics of Happiness.”Economics and Philosophy 24 (2008): 145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrow, L., and Rouse, C. E.. “School Vouchers: Recent Findings and Unanswered Questions.”Economic Perspectives 32 (2008): 2–16.Google Scholar
Battin, M. P.“Can Suicide Be Rational? Yes, Sometimes.” In Werth, J. L., ed., Contemporary Perspectives on Rational Suicide. Oxford: Taylor & Francis, 1999, 13–21.Google Scholar
Beattie, J., Baron, J., Hershey, J. C., and Spranca, M. D.. “Psychological Determinants of Decision Attitude.”Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 7 (1994): 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Porath, S. R. “Race, Choice and Opportunity.” Forthcoming in Theory and Research in Education.
Ben-Porath, S. R.Tough Choices: Structured Paternalism and the Landscape of Choice. Princeton University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, I.“Two Concepts of Liberty.” In Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford University Press, 1969, 118–172.Google Scholar
Berry, W.“An Argument for Diversity.” In Berry, W., ed., What Are People For?New York: North Point Press, 1990, 109–122.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, J. A.“Does Mood Influence Moral Judgment? An Empirical Test with Legal and Policy Implications.”Law & Psychology Review 29 (2005): 1–28.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, J. A.“Emotional Paternalism.”Florida State University Law Review 35 (2007): 1–72.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, J. A. “Expert Paternalism.” Florida Law Review 64 (2012): 721–757.
Blumenthal, J. A.“Law and the Emotions: The Problems of Affective Forecasting.”Indiana Law Journal 80 (2005): 155–238.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, J. A., and Huang, P. H.. “Positive Parentalism.” The National Law Journal (2009): 27.
Bok, D.The Politics of Happiness: What Government Can Learn from the New Research on Well-Being. Princeton University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouwsma, O. K., and Wittgenstein, L.. Wittgenstein: Conversations, 1949–1951. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1986.Google Scholar
Bradley, B.Well-Being and Death. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, R. B.“The Morality and Rationality of Suicide.” In Perlin, S., ed., A Handbook for the Study of Suicide. Oxford University Press, 1975, 61–75.Google Scholar
Bratman, M. Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Brighouse, H.School Choice and Social Justice. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Brock, D. W.“Paternalism and Autonomy.”Ethics 98 (1988): 550–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, J.“Does Rationality Give Us Reasons?”Philosophical Issues 15 (2005): 321–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrows, P.“Patronising Paternalism.”Oxford Economic Papers 45 (1993): 542–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calcott, P.“Paternalism and Public Choice.”Victoria Economic Commentaries (2000): 39–46.Google Scholar
Camerer, C., Issacharoff, S., Loewenstein, G., O’Donoghue, T., and Rabin, M.. “Regulation for Conservatives: Behavioral Economics and the Case for ‘Asymmetric Paternalism’.”University of Pennsylvania Law Review 151 (2003): 1211–1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carothers, A.“Letter from Costa Rica.”E Magazine, September 1993.Google Scholar
Cavanagh, J. T. O., Carson, A. J., Sharpe, M., and Lawrie, S. M.. “Psychological Autopsy Studies of Suicide: A Systematic Review.”Psychological Medicine 33 (2003): 395–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cave, E. M.“What’s Wrong with Motive Manipulation?”Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (2007): 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Center for Health Transformation. “Healthcare That Works: Answering President Obama’s Challenge of Finding What Works.” Center for Health Transformation. .
Cholbi, M. J.“A Kantian Defense of Prudential Suicide.”Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (2010): 489–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cholbi, M. J.“Depression, Listlessness, and Moral Motivation.”Ratio 24 (2011): 28–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cholbi, M. J.“Suicide Intervention and Non-Ideal Kantian Theory.”Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (2002): 245–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cholbi, M. J.Suicide: The Philosophical Dimensions. Buffalo, NY: Broadview Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Chubb, J. E., and Moe, T. M.. Politics, Markets, and America’s Schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Clarke, S.“A Definition of Paternalism.”Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 5 (2002): 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A.“Self-Ownership, World Ownership, and Equality.” In Lucash, F. S., ed., Justice and Equality Here and Now. Cornell University Press, 1986, 108–135.Google Scholar
Cowley, C.“Suicide Is Neither Rational Nor Irrational.”Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (2006): 495–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CREDO. “Multiple Choice: Charter School Performance in 16 States.” Center for Research on Education Outcomes, 2009. .
Criddle, E. J.“Fiduciary Administration: Rethinking Popular Representation in Agency Rulemaking.”Texas Law Review 88 (2010): 441–503.Google Scholar
Criddle, E. J.“Fiduciary Foundations of Administrative Law.”UCLA Law Review 54 (2006): 117–183.Google Scholar
Cullity, G.“Moral Free Riding.”Philosophy & Public Affairs 24 (1995): 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushman, F., Young, L., and Greene, J. D.. “Our Multi-System Moral Psychology: Towards a Consensus View.” In Doris, J., ed., The Moral Psychology Handbook. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010, 47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Marneffe, P.“Avoiding Paternalism.”Philosophy & Public Affairs 34 (2006): 68–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Marneffe, P.Liberalism and Prostitution. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, P.“On Choosing Death.” In Battin, M. P. and Mayo, D. J., eds., Suicide: The Philosophical Issues. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1980, 138–143.Google Scholar
Diener, E., Lucas, R., Schimmack, U., and Helliwell, J.. Well-Being for Public Policy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodenhoff, D.“Fixing the Milwaukee Public Schools: The Limits of Parent-Driven Reform.”Wisconsin Policy Research Institute 5 (2007).Google Scholar
Dolan, P., and White, M. P.. “How Can Measures of Subjective Well-Being Be Used to Inform Public Policy?”Perspectives on Psychological Science 2 (2007): 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durant, W.The Story of Philosophy. Eastsound, WA: Turtleback Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Dworkin, G.Mill’s On Liberty: Critical Essays. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield, 1997.Google Scholar
Dworkin, G.“Paternalism.”The Monist 56 (1972): 64–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, G. “Paternalism.” In E. N. Zalta, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2010. .
Dworkin, G.“Paternalism: Some Second Thoughts.” In Sartorius, R., ed., Paternalism. University of Minnesota Press, 1982, 105–112.Google Scholar
Dworkin, G.The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R.Justice for Hedgehogs. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Dwyer, J. G.“Changing the Conversation About Children’s Education.” In Macedo, S. and Tamir, Y., eds., Moral and Political Education. New York University Press, 2002, 314–358.Google Scholar
Edwards, C.“Beyond Mental Competence.”Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (2010): 273–289.Google Scholar
Ellerman, D.“Inalienable Rights: A Litmus Test for Liberal Theories of Justice.”Law and Philosophy 29 (2010): 571–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estlund, D. M. Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Farnsworth, E. A.Contracts. 4th edn. New York: Aspen, 2004.Google Scholar
Feinberg, J.Harm to Others. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Feinberg, J.Harm to Self. Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Feinberg, J.“Legal Paternalism.” In Rights, Justice, and the Bounds of Liberty. Princeton University Press, 1980, 110–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figlio, D. N., and Hart, C.. Competitive Effects of Means-Tested School Vouchers. Evanston, IL: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleurbaey, M. “The Importance of What People Care About.” Forthcoming in Politics, Philosophy and Economics.
Forgeard, M. J. C., Jayawickreme, E., Kern, M. L., and Seligman, M. E. P.. “Doing the Right Thing: Measuring Well-Being for Public Policy.”International Journal of Wellbeing 1 (2011): 79–106.Google Scholar
Foster, E. “Here Come Catch Shares: How NOAA and the Environmental Defense Fund Plan to Destroy North Carolina’s Working Watermen.”Island Free Press, November 10, 2010.Google Scholar
Fox-Decent, E.Sovereignty’s Promise: The State as Fiduciary. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, H.“Reply to John Martin Fischer.” In Buss, S. and Overton, L., eds., Contours of Agency: Essays on Themes from Harry Frankfurt. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002, 27–31.Google Scholar
Frey, B. S. Happiness: A Revolution in Economics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galenson, D. W.“The Rise and Fall of Indentured Servitude in the Americas: An Economic Analysis.”The Journal of Economic History 44 (1984): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallup Organization. Survey by Gallup Organization, May 2–May 8, 1988. Gallup Poll, May 1988. iPOLL Databank, The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut. .
Gert, B., and Culver, C. M.. “The Justification of Paternalism.”Ethics 89 (1979): 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, D. T.Stumbling on Happiness. New York: Knopf, 2006.Google Scholar
Gilbert, D. T., and Ebert, J. E. J.. “Decisions and Revisions: The Affective Forecasting of Changeable Outcomes.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82 (2002): 503–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, D. T., Gill, M. J., and Wilson, T. D.. “The Future Is Now: Temporal Correction in Affective Forecasting.”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 88 (2002): 430–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, D. T., and Wilson, T. D.. “Miswanting: Some Problems in the Forecasting of Future Affective States.” In Forgas, J., ed., Feeling and Thinking: The Role of Affect in Social Cognition. Cambridge University Press, 2000, 178–196.Google Scholar
Gilles, S. G.“On Educating Children: A Parentalist Manifesto.”University of Chicago Law Review 63 (1996): 937–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillette, C. P., and Krier, J. E.. “Risk, Courts, and Agencies.”University of Pennsylvania Law Review 138 (1990): 1027–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., and Kahneman, D., eds. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giordano, R., and Hardy, D.. “School Choice Gains Widespread Momentum.” Philly.com, January 31, 2011. .
Glaeser, E. L. “The Moral Heart of Economics.” The New York Times Economix Blog, January 25, 2011. .
Glaeser, E. L.“Paternalism and Psychology.”University of Chicago Law Review 73 (2006): 133–156.Google Scholar
Gleason, P., and Silverberg, M., National Center for Education Evaluation, Regional Assistance (US), and Institute of Education Sciences (US). The Evaluation of Charter School Impacts: Final Report. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education, 2010.Google Scholar
Gold, J. L.“Paternalistic or Protective? Freedom of Expression and Direct-to-Consumer Drug Advertising Policy in Canada.”Health Law Review 11 (2003): 30–38.Google Scholar
Graber, G.“The Rationality of Suicide.” In Wallace, S. and Eser, A., eds., Suicide and Euthanasia: The Rights of Personhood. University of Tennessee Press, 1981, 51–65.Google Scholar
Green, D. P., and Gerken, A. E.. “Self-Interest and Public Opinion Toward Smoking Restrictions and Cigarette Taxes.”Public Opinion Quarterly 53 (1989): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, J. P.Education Myths: What Special Interest Groups Want You to Believe About Our Schools – and Why It Isn’t So. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2005.Google Scholar
Greenspan, P.“The Problem with Manipulation.”American Philosophical Quarterly 40 (2003): 155–164.Google Scholar
Grill, K.“Anti-Paternalism and Invalidation of Reasons.”Public Reason 2 (2010): 3–20.Google Scholar
Grill, K. “Anti-Paternalism and Public Health Policy.” Ph.D. thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 2009.
Grill, K.“The Normative Core of Paternalism.”Res Publica 13 (2007): 441–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gul, F., and Pesendorfer, W.. “The Case for Mindless Economics.” In Caplin, A. and Schotter, A., eds., The Foundations of Positive and Normative Economics: A Handbook. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008, 3–42.Google Scholar
Guthrie, C., Rachlinski, J. J., and Wistrich, A. J.. “Blinking on the Bench: How Judges Decide Cases.”Cornell Law Review 93 (2007): 1–43.Google Scholar
Guthrie, C., Rachlinski, J. J., and Wistrich, A. J.. “Inside the Judicial Mind.”Cornell Law Review 86 (2001): 777–867.Google Scholar
Gutmann, A.Democratic Education. Princeton University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutmann, A.“How Limited Is Liberal Government?” In Yack, B., ed., Liberalism Without Illusions: Essays on Liberal Theory and the Political Vision of Judith N. Shklar. University of Chicago Press, 1996, 64–81.Google Scholar
Halpern, J., and Arnold, R. M.. “Affective Forecasting: An Unrecognized Challenge in Making Serious Health Decisions.”Journal of General Internal Medicine 23 (2008): 1708–1712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Interactive, Harris. “The Harris Poll #10, CDC, FAA, NIH, FDA, FBI and USDA Get the Highest Ratings of Thirteen Federal Government Agencies,” February 6, 2007. .
Interactive, Harris.“The Harris Poll #30, Closing the Budget Deficit: U.S. Adults Strongly Resist Raising Any Taxes Except ‘Sin Taxes’ or Cutting Major Programs,” April 10, 2007. .
Interactive, Harris. “The Harris Poll #149, Oil, Pharmaceutical, Health Insurance, and Tobacco Top the List Of Industries That People Think Should Be More Regulated,” December 2, 2010. .
Hausman, D. M., and McPherson, M. S.. Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy, and Public Policy. Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, D. M., and Welch, B.. “Debate: To Nudge or Not to Nudge.”Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (2010): 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haybron, D. M.The Pursuit of Unhappiness: The Elusive Psychology of Well-Being. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Herman, B.“Transforming Incentives: Feelings and the Making of the Kantian Moral Agent.” In Carslon, A, ed., Philosophical Aspects on Emotions. Stockholm: Thales, 2005, Section 3.Google Scholar
Hess, F. M. “Does School Choice ‘Work’?” National Affairs, no. 5 (2010). .
Hibbing, J. R., and Theiss-Morse, E.. Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs About How Government Should Work. Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodson, J. D.“The Principle of Paternalism.”American Philosophical Quarterly 14 (1977): 61–69.Google Scholar
Hospers, J.“What Libertarianism Is.” In Machan, T., ed., The Libertarian Alternative. New York: Nelson Hall, 1974, 3–20.Google Scholar
Huang, P. H.“Authentic Happiness, Self-Knowledge and Legal Policy.”Minnesota Journal of Science and Technology 9 (2008): 755–784.Google Scholar
Huang, P. H., and Blumenthal, J. A.. “Positive Law and Policy.”Encyclopedia of Positive Psychology 2 (2009): 730–732.Google Scholar
Hurd, H. M.“Paternalism on Pain of Punishment.”Criminal Justice Ethics 28 (2009): 49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husak, D.“Convergent Ends, Divergent Means: A Response to My Critics.”Criminal Justice Ethics 28 (2009): 119–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husak, D.Drugs and Rights. Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husak, D.“Legal Paternalism.” In LaFollette, H., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Practical Ethics. Oxford University Press, 2003, 387–412.Google Scholar
Husak, D.Legalize This!: The Case for Decriminalizing Drugs. Brooklyn, NY: Verso Books, 2002.Google Scholar
Husak, D.Overcriminalization: The Limits of the Criminal Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Husak, D.“Paternalism.” Forthcoming in Marmor, A, ed., The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Law. London: Routledge.
Husak, D.“Paternalism and Autonomy.”Philosophy & Public Affairs 10 (1981): 27–46.Google Scholar
Husak, D.“Paternalism and Consent.” In Miller, F. G. and Wertheimer, A., eds., The Ethics of Consent: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press, 2010, 107–130.Google Scholar
Husak, D.“Recreational Drugs and Paternalism.”Law and Philosophy 8 (1989): 353–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husak, D., and de Marneffe, P.. The Legalization of Drugs. Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, S. S., and Lepper, M. R.. “Choice and Its Consequences: On the Costs and Benefits of Self-Determination.” In Tesser, A., Stapel, D. A., and Wood, J. V., eds., Self and Motivation: Emerging Psychological Perspectives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2002, 71–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, S. S., and Lepper, M. R.. “When Choice Is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing?”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 (2000): 995–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, D.“Utilitarianism Without Consequentialism: The Case of John Stuart Mill.”Philosophical Review 117 (2008): 159–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamison, K. R.Night Falls Fast: Understanding Suicide. New York: Vintage Books, 2000.Google Scholar
Joiner, T. Why People Die by Suicide. Harvard University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Jolls, C., Sunstein, C. R., and Thaler, R. H.. “A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics.”Stanford Law Review 50 (1998): 1471–1550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D.“Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics.”The American Economic Review 93 (2003): 1449–1475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D.Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., and Thaler, R. H., “Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion and Status Quo Bias.” In Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A., eds., Choices, Values, and Frames. Cambridge University Press, 2000, 159–170.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., and Stone, A.. “Toward National Well-Being Accounts.”The American Economic Review 94 (2004): 429–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A., eds. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A., eds. Choices, Values, and Frames. Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. P., and Sarin, R.. “Back to Bentham? Explorations of Experienced Utility.”The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (1997): 375–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Permanente, Kaiser. “Kaiser Permanente Colorado Offers Its Employees incentaHEALTH Weight Loss and Wellness Program for Fourth Consecutive Year,” February 7, 2007. .
Kaustia, M., Alho, E., and Puttonen, V.. “How Much Does Expertise Reduce Behavioral Biases? The Case of Anchoring Effects in Stock Return Estimates.”Financial Management 37 (2008): 391–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, J. T. Framing Democracy: A Behavioral Approach to Democratic Theory. Forthcoming from Princeton University Press.
Klein, D. B.“Statist Quo Bias.”Econ Journal Watch 1 (2004): 260–271.Google Scholar
Kleinig, J. Paternalism. Manchester University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Klick, J., and Mitchell, G.. “Government Regulation of Irrationality: Moral and Cognitive Hazards.”Minnesota Law Review 90 (2005): 1620–1663.Google Scholar
Klosko, G.Political Obligations. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Klosko, G.The Principle of Fairness and Political Obligation. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1992.Google Scholar
Knack, S.“Election-Day Registration: The Second Wave.”American Politics Research 29 (2001): 65–78.Google Scholar
Korobkin, R.“Bounded Rationality, Standard Form Contracts, and Unconscionability.”University of Chicago Law Review 70 (2003): 1203–1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korobkin, R., and Guthrie, C.. “Psychology, Economics, and Settlement: A New Look at the Role of the Lawyer.”Texas Law Review 76 (1997): 77–141.Google Scholar
Kray, L., and Gonzalez, R.. “Differential Weighting in Choice Versus Advice: I’ll Do This, You Do That.”Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 12 (1999): 207–218.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krier, J. E.“Risk and Design.”The Journal of Legal Studies 19 (1990): 781–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kronman, A. T.“Paternalism and the Law of Contracts.”The Yale Law Journal 92 (1983): 763–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kronman, A. T.“Specific Performance.”The University of Chicago Law Review 45 (1978): 351–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyritsis, D.“Representation and Waldron’s Objection to Judicial Review.”Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26 (2006): 733–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larmore, C. E. Patterns of Moral Complexity. Cambridge University Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layard, R.Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. New York: The Penguin Press HC, 2005.Google Scholar
Leenaars, A. A.Suicide Notes: Predictive Clues and Patterns. New York: Human Sciences Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Levi, M., and Stoker, L.. “Political Trust and Trustworthiness.”Annual Review of Political Science 3 (2000): 475–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Meira. The Demands of Liberal Education. Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Locke, J.Two Treatises of Government. London: Awnsham Churchill, 1690.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G., and Haisley, E.. “The Economist as Therapist: Methodological Ramifications of ‘Light’ Paternalism.” In Caplin, A. and Schotter, A., eds., Perspectives on the Future of Economics: Positive and Normative Foundations, Vol. i. The Handbook of Economic Methodologies. Oxford University Press, 2008, 210–248.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G., and Schkade, D.. “Wouldn’t It Be Nice? Predicting Future Feelings.” In Kahneman, D., Diener, E., and Schwarz, N., eds., Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1999, 85–107.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G., and Ubel, P. A.. “Hedonic Adaptation and the Role of Decision and Experience Utility in Public Policy.”Journal of Public Economics 92 (2008): 1795–1810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luper, S. The Philosophy of Death. Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macey, J. R.“Transaction Costs and the Normative Elements of the Public Choice Model: An Application to Constitutional Theory.”Virginia Law Review 74 (1988): 471–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, A. A Short History of Ethics: A History of Moral Philosophy from the Homeric Age to the Twentieth Century. 2nd edn. University of Notre Dame Press, 1998.
MADD. Survey by MADD, Nationwide Insurance and Gallup Organization, July 26–August 14, 2005. MADD, 2005. iPOLL Databank, The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut. .
Martinez, M. D., and Hill, D.. “Did Motor Voter Work?”American Politics Research 27 (1999): 296–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, D. Modus Vivendi Liberalism: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J.“Virtue and Reason in the Concept of a Person in Ethical Theory.”The Monist 62 (1979): 331–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeil, B. J., Pauker, S. G., Sox, Jr. H. C., and Tversky, A.. “On the Elicitation of Preferences for Alternative Therapies.”New England Journal of Medicine 306 (1982): 1259–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mele, A. R.Autonomous Agents: From Self-Control to Autonomy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mello, M. M., Rimm, E. B., and Studdert, D. M.. “The McLawsuit: The Fast-Food Industry and Legal Accountability for Obesity.”Health Affairs 22 (2003): 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mello, M. M., Studdert, D. M., and Brennan, T. A.. “Obesity – the New Frontier of Public Health Law.”New England Journal of Medicine 354 (2006): 2601–2610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mengisen, A. “From Push to Nudge: A Q&A With the Authors of the Latter.” Freakonomics: The Hidden Side of Everything, April 15, 2008. .
Merrill, T. W.“Rethinking Article I, Section I: From Nondelegation to Exclusive Delegation.”Columbia Law Review 104 (2004): 2097–2181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J. S.On Liberty, ed. Rapaport, E.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1978.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S.Utilitarianism, ed. Sher, G.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 2001.Google Scholar
Mitchell, G.“Libertarian Paternalism Is an Oxymoron.”Northwestern University Law Review 99 (2005): 1245–1277.Google Scholar
Mohanty, M.“Small Farmers and Doha Round: Lessons from Mexico’s NAFTA Experience.”La Chronique Des Amériques 12 (2008).Google Scholar
Monahan, A. B.“Addressing the Problem of Impatients, Impulsives and Other Imperfect Actors in 401 (k) Plans.”Virginia Tax Review 23 (2004): 471–529.Google Scholar
Motto, J. A.“The Right to Suicide: A Psychiatrist’s View.”Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior 2 (1972): 183–188.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. Equality and Partiality. Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
National High School Center. “The First Year of High School: A Quick Stats Fact Sheet,” March 2007. .
Neatby, S. “Hard Times Sold in Vending Machines: Worker Migration from Atlantic Canada to the Tar Sands.” The Dominion, January 8, 2008. .
Noggle, R.“Manipulative Actions: A Conceptual and Moral Analysis.”American Philosophical Quarterly 33 (1996): 43–55.Google Scholar
Notebook, The. “Choosing a High School,” 2011. .
Nozick, R. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books, 1974.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C.“The Costs of Tragedy: Some Moral Limits of Cost–Benefit Analysis.”The Journal of Legal Studies 29 (2000): 1005–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ofir, C.“Ease of Recall vs. Recalled Evidence in Judgment: Experts vs. Laymen.”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 81 (2000): 28–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orr, S. W.“Values, Preferences, and the Citizen–Consumer Distinction in Cost–Benefit Analysis.”Politics, Philosophy & Economics 6 (2007): 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paige, R. “A Time for Choice: Remarks at the Heritage Foundation,” January 28, 2004. .
Parfit, D.On What Matters, Vol. i. Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Parfit, D.Reasons and Persons. New York: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Pettit, P.“Free Riding and Foul Dealing.”The Journal of Philosophy 83 (1986): 361–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilpel, A., and Amsel, L.. “What Is Wrong with Rational Suicide.”Philosophia 39 (2011): 111–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, T. M.“Counting the Dragon’s Teeth and Claws: The Definition of Hard Paternalism.”Georgia State University Law Review 20 (2004): 659–722.Google Scholar
Pope, T. M.“Is Public Health Paternalism Really Never Justified? A Response to Joel Feinberg.”Oklahoma City University Law Review 30 (2005): 121–207.Google Scholar
Postrel, V. I.“Paternalism Test: Regulation Is the Real Test of the ‘anti-Government’ Mood.”Reason 26 (1994): 4–5.Google Scholar
Prado, C. G. Choosing to Die: Elective Death and Multiculturalism. Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prentice, R. A.“The Case of the Irrational Auditor: A Behavioral Insight into Securities Fraud Litigation.”Northwestern University Law Review 95 (2000): 133–219.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Raz, J.The Morality of Freedom. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Raz, J.Practical Reason and Norms. Oxford University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, R.“How and Why to Support Common Schooling and Educational Choice at the Same Time.”Journal of Philosophy of Education 41 (2007): 709–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Research for Action. “Freshman Year Policy Brief,” 2010. .
Reynolds, D. “Forced to Be Fit at Work?: With Health Care Costs Soaring, Some Employers Are Giving an Ultimatum: Shape up or Pay Up,” February 11, 2009. .
Richardson, H. S.“The Stupidity of the Cost–Benefit Standard.”The Journal of Legal Studies 29 (2000): 971–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, L. “Lost in the School Choice Maze.” The New York Times, May 6, 2011. .
Rosen, A. D. Kant’s Theory of Justice. Cornell University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, S. B.“Mandatory Pro Bono: Historical and Constitutional Perspectives.”Cardozo Law Review 2 (1981): 255–297.Google Scholar
Rothbard, M. N.Man, Economy, and State: A Treatise on Economic Principles. New York: Van Nostrand, 1962.Google Scholar
Sagoff, M.“At the Shrine of Our Lady of Fatima or Why Political Questions Are Not All Economic.”Arizona Law Review 23 (1981): 1283–1298.Google Scholar
Sagoff, M.“Values and Preferences.”Ethics 96 (1986): 301–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvat, C. “Is Libertarian Paternalism an Oxymoron? A Comment on Sunstein and Thaler.”HAL Working Papers Series, no. hal-00336528, version 1 (2008).Google Scholar
Satz, D.“Equality, Adequacy, and Education for Citizenship.”Ethics 117 (2007): 623–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. What We Owe to Each Other. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Schapiro, T.“What Is a Child?”Ethics 109 (1999): 715–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schauer, F.“Is There a Psychology of Judging?” In Klein, D. B. and Mitchell, G., eds., The Psychology of Judicial Decision Making. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010, 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlozman, K. L., and Tierney, J. T.. Organized Interests and American Democracy. New York: Harper & Row, 1986.Google Scholar
Schmidtz, D.“A Place for Cost–Benefit Analysis.”Noûs 35 (2001): 148–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, M., Teske, P., and Marschall, M.. Choosing Schools: Consumer Choice and the Quality of American Schools. Princeton University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Schneider, M., Teske, P., Roch, C., and Marschall, M.. “Networks to Nowhere: Segregation and Stratification in Networks of Information About Schools.”American Journal of Political Science 41 (1997): 1201–1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B., Ward, A., Monterosso, J., Lyubomirsky, S., White, K., and Lehman, D. R.. “Maximizing Versus Satisficing: Happiness Is a Matter of Choice.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83 (2002): 1178–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scoccia, D.“Paternalism and Respect for Autonomy.”Ethics 100 (1990): 318–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scoccia, D.“In Defense of Hard Paternalism.”Law and Philosophy 27 (2008): 351–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K.“Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory.”Philosophy & Public Affairs 6 (1977): 317–344.Google Scholar
Shanteau, J.“Competence in Experts: The Role of Task Characteristics.”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 53 (1992): 252–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanteau, J.“Expert Judgment and Financial Decision Making.” In Green, B., ed., Risky Business: Risk Behavior and Risk Management. Stockholm University, 1995, 203–215.Google Scholar
Shanteau, J.“Psychological Characteristics and Strategies of Expert Decision Makers.”Acta Psychologica 68 (1988): 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, D. L.“Courts, Legislatures, and Paternalism.”Virginia Law Review 74 (1988): 519–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiffrin, S. V.“Paternalism, Unconscionability Doctrine, and Accommodation.”Philosophy & Public Affairs 29 (2000): 205–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, J., and Ariely, D.. “Keeping Doors Open: The Effect of Unavailability on Incentives to Keep Options Viable.”Management Science 50 (2004): 575–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, K.“Psychosocial Aspects of Rational Suicide.”American Journal of Psychotherapy 40 (1986): 405–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, A. J.“Fair Play and Political Obligation: Twenty Years Later.” In Justification and Legitimacy: Essays on Rights and Obligations. Cambridge University Press, 2000, 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, A. J.“The Principle of Fair Play.” In Moral Principles and Political Obligations. Princeton University Press, 1979, 101–142.Google Scholar
Slovic, P.“Perception of Risk.”Science 236 (1987): 280–285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., and Lichtenstein, S.. “Characterizing Perceived Risk.” In Kates, R. W., Hohenemser, C., and Kasperson, J. X., eds., Perilous Progress: Managing the Hazards of Technology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1985, 91–125.Google Scholar
Snyder, C. R., and Lopez, S. J.. Positive Psychology: The Scientific and Practical Explorations of Human Strengths. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2006.Google Scholar
Stewart, T., Wolf, P., Cornman, S. Q., McKenzie-Thompson, K., and Butcher, J.. Family Reflections on the District of Columbia Opportunity Scholarship Program: Final Summary Report. University of Arkansas School Choice Demonstration Project, 2009.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., and Fitoussi, J. P.. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. The Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, 2009.Google Scholar
Sullum, J.“Freedom Riders: How Motorcyclists Won the Right to Feel the Wind in Their Hair – and Why Drivers Still Have to Buckle Up.”Reason 37 (2005): 40–46.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R.“Cognition and Cost–Benefit Analysis.”The Journal of Legal Studies 29 (2000): 1059–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. R.“The Laws of Fear.”Harvard Law Review 115 (2002): 1119–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. R.“Legal Interference with Private Preferences.”University of Chicago Law Review 53 (1986): 1129–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. R.The Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle. Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. R., and Thaler, R. H.. “Libertarian Paternalism Is Not an Oxymoron.”University of Chicago Law Review 70 (2003): 1159–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. R., and Ullmann-Margalit, E.. “Second-Order Decisions.”Ethics 110 (1999): 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sussman, D.“What’s Wrong with Torture?”Philosophy & Public Affairs 33 (2005): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, A.How Not to Be a Hypocrite: School Choice for the Morally Perplexed Parent. London: Routledge, 2003.Google ScholarPubMed
Talbott, W. J. Human Rights and Human Well-Being. Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. S.“Introduction.” In Taylor, J. S., ed., Personal Autonomy: New Essays on Personal Autonomy and Its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 2005, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teno, J. M., Hakim, R. B., Knaus, W. A., Wenger, N. S., Phillips, R. S., Wu, A. W., Layde, P., Connors, A. F., Dawson, N. V., and Lynn, J.. “Preferences for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Physician–Patient Agreement and Hospital Resource Use.”Journal of General Internal Medicine 10 (1995): 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetlock, P. E.“Thinking the Unthinkable: Sacred Values and Taboo Cognitions.”Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (2003): 320–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. H., and Sunstein, C. R.. “Libertarian Paternalism.”The American Economic Review 93 (2003): 175–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. H., and Sunstein, C. R.. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H., Sunstein, C. R., and Balz, J.. “Choice Architecture.” SSRN Working Paper Series (2010). .
Trout, J. D.The Empathy Gap: Building Bridges to the Good Life and the Good Society. New York: Viking Adult, 2009.Google Scholar
Trout, J. D.“Paternalism and Cognitive Bias.”Law and Philosophy 24 (2005): 393–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Census Bureau. “State & County QuickFacts: Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania,” January 31, 2012. .
Valdman, M.“The Deep Problem with Voluntaristic Theories of Political Obligation.”American Philosophical Quarterly 47 (2010): 267–278.Google Scholar
VanDeVeer, D. Paternalistic Intervention: The Moral Bounds of Benevolence. Princeton University Press, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viteritti, J. P.Choosing Equality: School Choice, the Constitution, and Civil Society. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Waldron, J.“Autonomy and Perfectionism in Raz’s Morality of Freedom.”Southern California Law Review 62 (1988): 1097–1152.Google Scholar
Wall, S. Liberalism, Perfectionism and Restraint. Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, S. “Self-Ownership and Paternalism.”Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (2009): 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, C. H.“Samaritanism and the Duty to Obey the Law.” In Wellman, C. H. and Simmons, A. J., eds., Is There a Duty to Obey the Law?Cambridge University Press, 2005, 1–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, C. H., and Simmons, A. J., eds. Is There a Duty to Obey the Law?Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werth, J. L.Rational Suicide?: Implications for Mental Health Professionals. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis, 1996.Google Scholar
Werth, J. L., and Cobia, D. C.. “Empirically Based Criteria for Rational Suicide: A Survey of Psychotherapists.”Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior 25 (1995): 231–240.Google Scholar
Westerman, D. A.“Expert and Novice Teacher Decision Making.”Journal of Teacher Education 42 (1991): 292–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, M. D.“Behavioral Law and Economics: The Assault on Consent, Will, and Dignity.” In Gaus, G., Favor, C., and Lamont, J., eds., Essays on Philosophy, Politics & Economics: Integration & Common Research Projects. Stanford University Press, 2010, 201–223.Google Scholar
Whitman, G., and Rizzo, M. J.. “Paternalist Slopes.”New York University Journal of Law and Liberty 2 (2007): 411–443.Google Scholar
Wikler, D.“Paternalism and the Mildly Retarded.”Philosophy & Public Affairs 8 (1979): 377–392.Google Scholar
Wilson, T. D., and Gilbert, D. T.. “Affective Forecasting.”Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 35 (2003): 345–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, T. A. “Small-Scale Farmers and Development: Assume a Different Economic Model.” Triple Crisis: Global Perspectives on Finance, Development, and Environment, September 27, 2010. .
Wolf, P., Eissa, N., and Babette, G.. “Who Chooses, Who Uses? Initial Evidence from the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program.” Education Working Paper Archive (July 6, 2006). .
Wonnell, C. T.“The Contractual Disempowerment of Employees.”Stanford Law Review 46 (1993): 87–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, B. D., and Waterman, R. W.. Bureaucratic Dynamics: The Role of Bureaucracy in a Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Wright, G., Bolger, F., and Rowe, G.. “An Empirical Test of the Relative Validity of Expert and Lay Judgments of Risk.”Risk Analysis 22 (2002): 1107–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, W. F.“Audit Judgment Consensus and Experience.” In Ferris, K. R., ed., Behavioral Accounting Research: A Critical Analysis. Post Falls, ID: Century, 1988, 305–328.Google Scholar
Zaleskiewicz, T.“Financial Forecasts During the Crisis: Were Experts More Accurate Than Laypeople?”Journal of Economic Psychology 32 (2011): 384–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamir, E.“The Efficiency of Paternalism.”Virginia Law Review 84 (1998): 229–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zweig, A., ed. Kant: Philosophical Correspondence, 1759–1799. University of Chicago Press, 1967.Google Scholar