Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-fg2fv Total loading time: 0.478 Render date: 2021-10-16T13:07:16.029Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

1 - Constantine and the Roman Senate: Conflict, Cooperation, and Concealed Resistance


Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2015

Michele Renee Salzman
professor of history at the University of California, Riverside
Michele Renee Salzman
University of California, Riverside
Marianne Sághy
Central European University, Budapest
Rita Lizzi Testa
Università degli Studi di Perugia, Italy
Get access


Constantine's relations to the senate and to Rome's resident senatorial aristocracy have attracted a good deal of scholarly attention, but not consensus. In the aftermath of World War II a number of scholars followed a view developed by Hungarian scholar András Alföldi, who characterized that relationship as conflict-ridden and filled with friction between an aggressively Christianizing emperor and a staunchly pagan senatorial aristocracy, the only pagan group capable of resisting. In Alföldi's view, imperial laws advanced Christianity and any policies that favored senators or paganism were grudging concessions to a strong, overtly hostile pagan political party. Alföldi's model has been called into question. Since the 1980s, some scholars have argued that there was no religious or political conflict and no resistance on the part of Rome's once pagan senatorial aristocracy who, increasingly Christian themselves, simply acquiesced to a newly Christianized empire. Other scholars have argued that because Constantine was either tolerant of pagans, or was not a “really” committed Christian, there was no religious or political conflict with Rome's pagan senate and senatorial aristocracy. And others have argued that religion was not relevant to this relationship; as Van Dam sees it, appeals to religion were part of the language of power, not a source of conflict in and of themselves.

In my view, the differing opinions in the abundant literature on Constantine's relations to Rome's senate and resident senatorial aristocracy conflate three distinct issues – the nature of the conflict, imperial interest in Christianization, and the power of the senate and senators to speak openly. Consequently, some scholars assume a strong, pagan senate confronting an aggressively Christianizing ruler led to overt political and religious conflict. Other scholars assume an acquiescent pagan senate responding to a more or less tolerant Christian emperor resulted in the lack of political or religious conflict. But each element in this narrative requires independent consideration because their conjunction has been based on a number of false assumptions. In particular, the senate, as an institution, is in need of reconsideration for it was limited, politically, in facing an emperor in the early fourth century. Consequently, this chapter aims to disentangle the evidence and reconsider relations between Constantine and Rome's senate and resident senatorial aristocracy.

Pagans and Christians in Late Antique Rome
Conflict, Competition, and Coexistence in the Fourth Century
, pp. 11 - 45
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Alföldi, A. The Conversion of Constantine and Pagan Rome, trans. Mattingly, H. (Oxford, 1948).Google Scholar
Bardill, J. Constantine, Divine Emperor of the Christian Golden Age (New York, 2012).Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D.Two Senators under Constantine.” JRS 65 (1975): 40–9.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D. Constantine and Eusebius (Cambridge, MA, 1981).Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D. The New Empire of Diocletian and Constantine (Cambridge, MA, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, T. D. “The Religious Affiliation of Consuls and Prefects, 317–361,” in From Eusebius to Augustine (Aldershot, 1994): 1–11.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D.Statistics and the Conversion of the Roman Aristocracy.” JRS 85 (1995): 135–47.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D. Constantine: Dynasty, Religion and Power in the Later Roman Empire (Chichester, 2011).Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D. and Westall, R. W., “The Conversion of the Roman Aristocracy in Prudentius’ Contra Symmachum.” Phoenix 45 (1991): 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnish, S. J. B.A Note on the collatio glebalis.” Historia (1989) 254–6.Google Scholar
Bonamente, G. Dall'imperatore divinizzato all'imperatore santo,” in Brown, P. and Testa, R. Lizzi, eds., Pagans and Christians in the Roman Empire: The Breaking of a Dialogue (IVth–VIth Century A.D.): Proceedings of the International Conference at the Monastery of Bose (October 2008) (Vienna, Zurich, Berlin, Muenster, New Brunswick, London, 2011), 339–70.Google Scholar
Brandt, H. Konstantin der Grosse. Der erst christliche Kaiser (Munich, 2006; 2nd ed., 2007).Google Scholar
Bruun, P. “The Consecration Coins of Constantine the Great,” in Zilliacus, H. and Henriksson, K.- E., eds., Commentationes in honorem Edwin Linkomies sexagenarii A.D. MCMLV editae (1954) 19–31 (= Arctos n.s. 1).Google Scholar
Bruun, P. Studies in Constantinian Chronology (New York, 1961).Google Scholar
Burckhardt, J. The Age of Constantine, trans. Hadas, M. (New York, 1949; 2nd ed.). Trans. of Die Zeit Konstantins des Grossen (Leipzig, 1880).Google Scholar
Cameron, Alan, The Last Pagans of Rome (Oxford, 2011).Google Scholar
Cameron, AlanAnician Myths,” JRS 102 (2012): 133–71.Google Scholar
Cameron, Averil and Hall, S., trans. Eusebius’ Life of Constantine, Introduction, Translation and Commentary (Oxford, 1999).Google Scholar
Champlin, E. J.Saint Gallicanus (Consul 317),” Phoenix 36 (1983): 71–6.Google Scholar
Chastagnol, A. La préfecture urbaine à Rome sous le Bas-Empire (Paris, 1960).Google Scholar
Chastagnol, A. Les Fastes de la préfecture de Rome au Bas-Empire (Paris, 1962).Google Scholar
Chastagnol, A. Le sénat romaine sous le règne d'Odoacre: Recherches sur l’épigraphie du Colisée au Ve siècle (Bonn, 1966).Google Scholar
Chastagnol, A.Les années régnales de Maximien Hercule en Egypte et les fêtes vicennales du 20 novembre 303,” RN 6, no. 9 (1967): 54–81.Google Scholar
Chastagnol, A. “Constantin et le sénat,” in Atti dell'Accademia Romanistica costantiniana (Perugia, 1976): 51–69.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. “L'Urbs e il suburbio,” in Giardina, A., ed., Società Romana e impero tardoantico. Roma politica economia paesaggio urbano II (Rome, Bari, 1986), 1–58.Google Scholar
Curran, J. Pagan City and Christian Capital: Rome in the Fourth Century (Oxford, 2000).Google Scholar
Drake, H. Constantine and the Bishops: The Politics of Intolerance (Baltimore, 2000).Google Scholar
Drake, H. “The Impact of Constantine on Christianity,” in Lenski, N., ed., The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Constantine (Cambridge, 2011), 111–36.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. Art and the Roman Viewer: The Transformation of Art from the Pagan World to Christianity (Cambridge, 1995).Google Scholar
Faust, S.Original und Spolie. Interaktive Strategien im Bildprogramm des Konstantinsbogens,” MDAI R 117 (2011): 377–408.Google Scholar
Fraschetti, A. La conversione da Roma pagana a Roma cristiana (Rome, Bari, 1999).Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, H.Studien zu den Consulardiptychen verwandten Denkmälern I. Eine Glasschale von der Vicennalienfeier Constantins des Grossen zu Rom im Jahre 326 Nach Chr.,” RM 54 (1939): 161–75.Google Scholar
Girardet, K. M. Der Kaiser und sein Gott: Das Christentum im Denken und in der Religionspolitik Konstantins des Grossen (Berlin, 2010).Google Scholar
Grig, L. and Kelly, G., “Introduction,” in Grig, L. and Kelly, G., eds., Two Romes: Rome and Constantinople in Late Antiquity (Oxford, 2013), 3–30.Google Scholar
Groag, E.Der Dichter Porfyrius in einer stadtrömischen Inschrift.” Wiener Studien 44–5 (1924–7): 102–9.Google Scholar
Grubbs, J. Law and Family in Late Antiquity (Oxford, 1995).Google Scholar
Grünewald, T. Constantinus Maximus Augustus. Herrschafts propaganda in der Zeitgenössen Überlieferung (Stuttgart, 1990).Google Scholar
Heather, P. “Senator and Senates,” in Cameron, Averil and Garnsey, P., eds., The Cambridge Ancient History 13 (Cambridge, 1998), 184–210.Google Scholar
Herzog, R., ed., Nouvelle histoire de la littérature latine, 5. Restauration et renouveau, 284–374 (Brepols, 1993).Google Scholar
Johnson, M. J. “Architecture of Empire,” in Lenski, N., ed., The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Constantine (Cambridge, 2011), 278–97.Google Scholar
Jones, A. H. M. The Later Roman Empire 284–602: A Social, Economic, and Administrative Survey (Norman, 1964; repr. Baltimore, 1986).Google Scholar
Kraft, K.Das Silbermedaillon Constantins des Grossen mit dem Christusmonogramm auf dem Helm.” JNG 5–6 (1956–5): 151–78.Google Scholar
Krautheimer, R. Three Christian Capitals: Topography and Politics (Berkeley, 1983).Google Scholar
Leader-Newby, R. E. Silver and Society in Late Antiquity (Aldershot, 2004).Google Scholar
Lenski, N.Evoking the Pagan Past: Instinctu divinitatis and Constantine's Capture of Rome,” JLA 1, no. 2 (2008): 204–57.Google Scholar
Lenski, N. “The Reign of Constantine,” in Lenski, N., ed., The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Constantine (Cambridge, 2011): 59–90.Google Scholar
Lenski, N. “The Sun and the Senate: The Inspiration for the Arch of Constantine,” in Costantino il Grande: alle radici dell'Europa (Vatican City, forthcoming).
Lizzi Testa, R. Policromia di cultura e raffinatezza editoriale. Gli esperimenti letterari dell'aristocrazia romana nel tardo Impero, in Carrié, J.-M. and Testa, R. Lizzi, eds., Humana Sapit. Études d'antiquité tardive offertes à Lellia Cracco Ruggini (Paris, 2002), 187–99.Google Scholar
Lizzi Testa, R. Senatori, popolo, papi. Il governo di Roma al tempo dei Valentiniani (Bari, 2004).Google Scholar
Lizzi Testa, R. “Costantino e il senato Romano,” in Costantino I. Enciclopedia Costantiniana sulla figura e l'immagine dell'imperatore del cosiddetto Editto di Milano 313–2013, I (Roma, 2013), 351–67.Google Scholar
MacCormack, S. Art and Ceremony in Late Antiquity (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1981).Google Scholar
MacMullen, R. Christianizing the Roman Empire: AD 100–400 (New Haven, 1984).Google Scholar
Marlowe, E.Framing the Sun: The Arch of Constantine and the Roman Cityscape.” Art Bulletin 88 (2006): 223–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marlowe, E. “Liberator urbis suae. Constantine and the Ghost of Maxentius,” in Ewald, B. C. and Norena, C. F., eds., The Emperor and Rome: Space, Representation and Ritual (Cambridge, 2010): 199–219.Google Scholar
Matthews, J. Western Aristocracies and the Imperial Court (Oxford, 1975; rev. ed. 1990).Google Scholar
McLynn, N.The Fourth Century Taurobolium.” Phoenix 50 (1996): 312–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLynn, N. “Pagans in a Christian Empire,” in Rousseau, P., ed., A Companion to Late Antiquity (Oxford, 2009), 572–87.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. The Conflict between Paganism and Christianity in the Fourth Century (Cambridge, 1963).Google Scholar
Moser, M. “Senatui auctoritatem pristinam reddidisti. The Roman Senatorial Aristocracy under Constantine and Constantius II” (diss. University of Cambridge, 2013).
Mueller, L., ed. Publilii Optatiani Porfyrii, Carmina (Leipzig, 1877).Google Scholar
Nixon, C. E. V. and Rodgers, B. S.. In Praise of Later Roman Emperors: The Panegyrici Latini (Berkeley, 1994).Google Scholar
Novak, D. M.Constantine and the Senate.” Ancient Society 10 (1979): 271–310.Google Scholar
Novak, D. M.The Early History of the Anician Family.” Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 1 (1979): 119–65.Google Scholar
Olgon, J. E. L. and Lawlor, H. J., trans. Eusebius: The Ecclesiastical History (Cambridge, MA, 1957).Google Scholar
Parisi Pressice, C. “L'abbandono della moderazione. I ritratti di Costantino e della sua progenie,” in Donati, A. and Gentili, G., eds., Costantino Il Grande: La civilità antica al bivio tra Occidente e Oriente (Milan, 2005), 138–55.Google Scholar
Parisi Pressice, C. “Konstantin als Iuppiter. Die Kolossalstatue des Kaisers aus der Basilika an der Via Sacra,” in Demandt, A. and Engemann, J., eds., Imperator Caesar Flavius Constantinus. Konstantin der Grosse. Ausstellungskatalog (Mainz, 2007), 117–31.Google Scholar
Paschoud, F.Zosime 2,29 et la version païenne de la conversion de Constantine.” Historia 2 (1971): 334–53.Google Scholar
Porena, P.Problemi di cronologia costantiniana. L'imperatore, Vettius Rufinus, e il senato.” AnTard 13 (2005): 205–46.Google Scholar
Salzman, M. R. On Roman Time: The Codex-Calendar of 354 and the Rhythms of Urban Life in Late Antiquity (Berkeley, 1990).Google Scholar
Salzman, M. R. The Making of a Christian Aristocracy. Social and Religious Change in the Western Roman Empire (Cambridge, MA, 2002).Google Scholar
Salzman, M. R. “The End of Public Sacrifice: Changing Definitions of Sacrifice in Post-Constantinian Rome and Italy,” in Knust, J. W. and Várhelyi, Z., eds., Ancient Mediterranean Sacrifice (Oxford, 2011), 167–83.Google Scholar
Salzman, M. R. and Roberts, M., trans. Letters of Symmachus. Book 1. Introduction and Commentary by Salzman, Michele Renee (Atlanta, 2012).Google Scholar
Scott, J. Domination and the Arts of Resistance, Hidden Transcripts (New Haven, 1990).Google Scholar
Speidel, M. P.Maxentius and His Equites Singulares in the Battle at the Milvian Bridge,” CA 5 (1986): 253–62.Google Scholar
Straub, J.Konstantins Verzicht auf dem Gang zum Kapitol.” Historia 4 (1955): 297–313 (=Regeneratio imperii [Darmstadt, 1972]) 100–18).Google Scholar
Valenzani, R. S. “La politica urbanistica tra i tetrarchi e Costantino,” in Ensoli, S. and Rocca, E. La, eds., Aurea Roma. Dalla città pagana alla città cristiana (Rome, 2000), 41–59.Google Scholar
Van Dam, R. The Roman Revolution of Constantine (Cambridge, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dam, R. Remembering Constantine at the Milvian Bridge (New York, Cambridge, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisweiller, J. “Inscribing Imperial Power: Letters from Emperors in Late Antique Rome,” in Witschell, C. and Behrwald, R., eds., Historische Erinnerung im städtischen Raum: Rom in der Spätantike (2012), 309–30.Google Scholar
Wiemer, H. U.Libanios und Zosimus über den Rom-Besuch Konstantins I. im Jahre 326.” Historia 43 (1994): 469–94.Google Scholar
Wienand, J. Der Kaiser als Sieger. Metamorphosen triumphaler Herrschaft unter Constantin I (Berlin, 2012).Google Scholar
Wilkinson, K. W.Palladas and the Age of Constantine.” JRS 99 (2009): 36–60.Google Scholar
Cited by

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats