Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-rcd7l Total loading time: 2.076 Render date: 2021-10-23T15:49:42.559Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Section I - Health promotion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2016

Martin Olsen
Affiliation:
East Tennessee State University
Botros Rizk
Affiliation:
University of South Alabama
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Well-woman visit. Committee Opinion No. 534. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120:421–4.PubMed
US Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration. Women’s preventive services guidelines. www.hrsa.gov/womensguidelines (accessed March 26, 2014).
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Well-woman care: assessments and recommendations. www.acog.org/About-ACOG/ACOG-Departments/Annual-Womens-Health-Care/Assessments-and-Recommendations (accessed April 8, 2014).
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Breast cancer screening. Practice Bulletin No. 122. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:372–82.
Nelson, HD, Tyne, K, Naik, A, et al. Screening for breast cancer: an update for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:727–37; W237–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, HD, Smith, MB, Griffin, JC, et al. Use of medications to reduce risk for primary breast cancer: a systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:604–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Screening for cervical cancer. Practice Bulletin No. 131. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120:1222–38.PubMed
Rex, DK, Johnson, DA, Anderson, JC, et al. American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer Screening 2009. Am J Gastroenterol 2009 Mar;104(3):739–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Gynecologic Practice. Committee Opinion No. 477: the role of the obstetrician-gynecologist in the early detection of epithelial ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:742–6.PubMed
Humphrey, LL, Deffebach, M, Pappas, M, et al. Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: a systematic review to update the US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation. Ann Intern Med 2013;159:411–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Osteoporosis. Practice Bulletin No. 129. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120:718–34.PubMed
Ross, AC, Manson, JE, Abrams, SA, et al. The 2011 report on dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin D from the Institute of Medicine: what clinicians need to know. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011;96:53–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guidelines for Women’s Health Care: A Resource Manual, Third Edition. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2007:314–19.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of Hypertension. National Institutes of Health Publication No. 03-5233, 2003. www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/hypertension/express.pdf (accessed June 18, 2014).
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Annual women’s health care: high risk factors. www.acog.org/About-ACOG/ACOG-Departments/Annual-Womens-Health-Care/High-Risk-Factors (accessed June 18, 2014).
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). National Institutes of Health Publication No.01-3670, 2001. www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/cholesterol/atp3full.pdf (accessed May 9, 2014).
US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for lipid disorders in adults: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. June 2008. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf08/lipid/lipidrs.htm (accessed June 18, 2014).
US Preventive Services Task Force. Aspirin for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:396404.CrossRefPubMed
Guidelines for Women’s Health Care: A Resource Manual, Third Edition. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2007:174–87.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. US selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2013. MMWR 2013;62(5):164. www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr6205.pdf.
Center for Disease Control and Prevention; Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended immunization schedule for adults aged 19 years and older – United States, 2014. MMWR 2014;63:110–12.
US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria in adults: clinical summary of a US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. AHRQ Publication No. 08-05120-EF-2, July 2008. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf08/asymptbact/asbactsum.htm.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines, 2010. MMWR 2010;59(12):1485. www.cdc.gov/std/treatment/2010/STD-Treatment-2010-RR5912.pdf.PubMed
US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for hepatitis B virus infection in nonpregnant adolescents and adults: final recommendation statement. AHRQ Publication No. 12-05172-EF-2. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf12/hepb/hepbfinalrs.htm.
US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for hepatitis B virus infection in pregnancy: US Preventive Services Task Force reaffirmation recommendation statement. AHRQ Publication No. 09-05134-EF-1, June 2009. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf09/hepb/hepbpgrs.htm.
US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for hepatitis C virus infection in adults: final recommendation statement. AHRQ Publication No. 12-05174-EF-2. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf12/hepc/hepcfinalrs.htm.
US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for genital herpes: recommendation statement. AHRQ Publication No. 05-0573-A, March 2005. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf05/herpes/herpesrs.htm.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Routine human immunodeficiency virus screening. Committee Opinion No. 596. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:1137–9.PubMed
Branson, BM, Handsfield, HH, Lampe, MA, et al. Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). MMWR 2006;55(RR-14):117.Google ScholarPubMed
US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for syphilis infection: recommendation statement. July 2004. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/3rduspstf/syphilis/syphilrs.htm.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Testing for tuberculosis (TB). www.cdc.gov/tb/publications/factsheets/testing/TB_testing.htm (accessed June 18 and July 9, 2014).
Guidelines for Women’s Health Care: A Resource Manual, Third Edition, Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2007: 276–81.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Health Care for Underserved Women. Elder abuse and women’s health. ACOG Committee Opinion 568. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:187–91.PubMed
Guidelines for Perinatal Care, Seventh Edition. Washington, DC: American Academy of Pediatricians and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2012: 144, 307–12.PubMed
US Preventive Services Task Force. Prevention of falls in community-dwelling older adults: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. AHRQ Publication No. 11-05150-EF-2, May 2012. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf11/fallsprevention/fallsprevrs.htm.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. At-risk drinking and illicit drug use: ethical issues in obstetric and gynecologic practice. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 422. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:1449–60.PubMed
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Overview of alcohol consumption and alcohol use disorders. www.niaaa.nih.gov/alcohol-health/overview-alcohol-consumption/alcohol-use-disorders (accessed July 9, 2014).
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Tobacco use and women’s health. Committee Opinion No. 503. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:746–50.PubMed
Guidelines for Women’s Health Care: A Resource Manual, Third Edition. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2007:288–93.
US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults, topic page. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/uspsdiab.htm.
US Department of Health and Human Services. 2008 physical activity guidelines for Americans; Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. ODPHP Publication No. U0036; October 2008. www.health.gov/paguidelines.
US Department of Agriculture and US Department of Health and Human Services. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010. Seventh Edition, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, December 2010. Available at www.dietaryguidelines.gov (accessed November 30, 2015).PubMed
National Heart, Blood and Lung Institute Obesity Education Initiative: The Practical Guide to the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults. NIH Publication No. 00-4084, October 2000. www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/obesity (accessed November 30, 2015).
Evans, ML, A desire to control: contraception throughout the ages. Historica Medicinae, 2009;1(1):E08.Google Scholar
Ahmed, S, Li, Q, Liu, L, Tsui, AO. Maternal deaths averted by contraceptive use: an analysis of 172 countries. Lancet 2012 Jul 14;380(9837):111–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finer, LB, Henshaw, SK. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States 1994 and 2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2006;38:90–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trussell, J. Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception 2011;83;397404. (Level III)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, HB, Xia, Z, Hughes, JM, et al. The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the US Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:1161–8; discussion 1168–70. (Level II-3)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice Bulletin No. 133: Benefits and risks of sterilization, February 2013.
Bartz, D, Greenberg, JA. Sterilization in the United States. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Winter;1(1):2332.Google ScholarPubMed
Workowski, KA, Bolan, GA; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines. MMWR Recomm Rep 2015 Jun 5;64(RR-03):1137.Google ScholarPubMed
Stamback, J, Qureshi, Z, Sekadde-Kigondu, C, et al. Checklist for ruling out pregnancy among family-planning clients in primary care. Lancet 1999;354(9178):566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice Bulletin No. 73: Use of hormonal contraception in women with coexisting medical conditions, June 2006, reaffirmed 2013.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. US selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2013, adapted from the World Health Organization Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2nd Edition, MMWR 2013;62:160.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee Opinion No. 602: Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and bone effects, June 2014.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice Bulletin No. 112: Emergency contraception, May 2010, reaffirmed 2014.
Faculty of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care in Clinical Effectiveness Unit. FFPRHC Guidance (April 2004). The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LGN-IUS) in contraception and reproductive health. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2004;30(2):99108: quiz 109 (Level III).CrossRef
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice Bulletin No. 121: Long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices, July 2011, reaffirmed 2013.
Basinski, CM, A review of clinical data for currently approved hysteroscopic sterilization procedures. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2010;3:101–10. (Level III)Google ScholarPubMed
Hillard, PJ, Berek, JS, Barss, VA, et al. Guidelines for Women’s Health Care: A Resource Manual, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2007.Google Scholar
American Academy of Family Physicians Breastfeeding Advisory Committee, Montgomery, A, Dermer, A, et al. Breastfeeding, Family Physicians Supporting (Position Paper). [Online] 2014 Available from: www.aafp.org/about/policies/all/breastfeeding-support.html. Accessed on 27 December 2014.
American Academy of Pediatrics. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics 2012;129(3):e827–41.
American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Breastfeeding: maternal and infant aspects. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 361. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:479–80.PubMed
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK). Maternal and Child Nutrition. NICE Public Health Guidance 11; 2008. [Modified 2014]. Available from: guidance.nice.org.uk/ph11.
WHO World Health Organization/UNICEF. Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding. [Online] Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2003. Available from: www.who.int/nutrition/topics/infantfeeding_recommendation/en. Accessed on 16 August 2014.
Centers for Disease Control for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity. Breastfeeding report card, United States/2014. [Online] Atlanta, Georgia: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Available from: www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/pdf/2014breastfeedingreportcard.pdf. Accessed on 15 August 2014.
Odum, EC, Li, R, Scanlon, KS, et al. Reasons for earlier than desired cessation of breastfeeding. Pediatrics 2013;131(3):e726–32.Google Scholar
US Department of Health and Human Services. The Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Support Breastfeeding. [Online] Washington, DC; 2011. Available from: www.surgeongeneral.gov/topics/breastfeeding. Accessed on 16 August 2014.
UNICEF/WHO World Health Organization. Protecting, promoting and supporting breastfeeding: The special role of maternity services, a joint WHO/UNICEF statement. [Online] Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1989. Available from: www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/9241561300/en. Accessed on 15 August 2014.
Labbok, MH. Global baby-friendly hospital initiative monitoring data: update and discussion. Breastfeed Med 2012;7(4):210–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. International code of marketing of breast-milk substitutes. [Online] Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1981. Available from: www.who.int/nutrition/publications/code_english.pdf. Accessed on 17 February 2015.
WHO/UNICEF. Innocenti declaration on the protection, promotion and support of breastfeeding. [Online] Florence, Italy: WHO/UNICEF (Spedale degli Innocenti); 1990. Available from: www.unicef.org/programme/breastfeeding/innocenti/htm. Accessed on 17 February 2015.
WHO/UNICEF. Baby-friendly hospital initiative. Revised, updated and expanded for integrative care. [Online] Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2009. Available from: www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/bfhi_trainingcourse_s1/en. Accessed on 1 March 2015.
US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2020. [Online] Washington, DC: US DHHS; 2010. Available from: www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/objectiveslist.aspx?topicid=26. Accessed on 17 August 2014.PubMed
ACOG Committee Opinion. Breastfeeding in underserved women: increasing initiation and continuation of breastfeeding. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122(2 Pt 1):423–8. Available from: doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000433008.93971.6a. Accessed on 15 August 2014.PubMed
Cattaneo, A, Burmaz, T, Arendt, M, et al. Protection, promotion and support of breast-feeding in Europe: progress from 2002 to 2007. Public Health Nutrition 2009;13(6):751–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Scanlon, KS, Grummer-Strawn, L, Li, R, et al. Racial and ethnic differences in breastfeeding initiation and duration, by state – national immunization survey, United States, 2004–2008. MMWR 2010;59:327–34.Google Scholar
UNICEF Infant and Young Child Feeding Global Databases, Last update October 2014. [Online] New York, USA: Data and Analytics Section; Division of Data, Research and Policy, UNICEF. Available from: http://data.unicef.org/nutrition/iycf. Accessed on 27 December 2014.
Ip, S, Chung, M, Raman, G, et al. Breastfeeding and maternal and infant health outcomes in developed countries. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment, 2007;153: Publication No. 07-E007.
Karlson, EW, Mandl, LA, Hankinson, SE, Grodstein, F. Do breast-feeding and other reproductive factors influence future risk of rheumatoid arthritis? Results from the Nurses’ Health Study. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50(11):3458–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, EB, Ray, RM, Stuebe, AM, et al. Duration of lactation and risk factors for maternal cardiovascular disease. Obstet Gynecol 2009;113(5):974–82.Google Scholar
Bartick, MC, Stuebe, AM, Schwartz, EB, et al. Cost analysis of maternal disease associated with suboptimal breastfeeding. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:111–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartick, M, Reinhold, A. The burden of suboptimal breastfeeding in the United States: a pediatric cost analysis. Pediatrics 2010;125:e1048–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, K, You, D, Inoue, M, et al. Technical Advisory Group of the United Nations Interagency Group for Child Mortality Estimation: child mortality estimation: accelerated progress in reducing global child mortality, 1990–2010. PloS Med 2012;9(8):31001313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, RA, Lawrence, RM. Management of the mother-infant nursing couple. In: Breastfeeding: A Guide for the Medical Profession, 7th ed. Maryland Heights, MO: Elsevier Mosby, 2011.Google Scholar
Stuebe, AM. Enabling women to achieve their breastfeeding goals. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123(3):643–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taveras, EM, Li, R, Grummer-Strawn, L, et al. Opinions and practices of clinicians associated with continuation of exclusive breastfeeding. Pediatrics 2004;113:e283–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
US Preventive Services Task Force. Primary care interventions to promote breastfeeding: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med 2008;149:560–4.
DiGirolamo, AM, Grummer-Strawn, L, Fein, SB. Effect of maternity-care practices on breastfeeding. Pediatrics 2008;122(Suppl 2):S43–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Strategies to Prevent Obesity and Other Chronic Disease: The CDC Guide to Strategies to Support Breastfeeding Mothers and Babies. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: US Department of Health and Human Services, 2013.PubMed
Grawey, AE, Marinelli, KA, Holmes, AV. ABM Clinical Protocol #14. Breastfeeding-friendly physician’s office: optimizing care for infants and children, revised 2013. Breastfeed Med 2013;8:237–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuebe, AM, Bonuck, K. What predicts intent to breastfeed exclusively? Breastfeeding knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs in a diverse urban population. Breastfeed Med 2011;6(6):413–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, R, Rock, VJ, Grummer-Strawn, L. Changes in public attitudes toward breastfeeding in the United States, 1999–2003. J Am Diet Assoc 2007;107:122–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagner, EA, Chantry, CJ, Dewey, DG, Nommsen-Rivers, LA. Breastfeeding concerns at 3 and 7 days postpartum and feeding status at 2 months. Pediatrics 2013;132:e86575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bunik, M. Breastfeeding telephone triage and advice. Elk Grove, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics, 2012.Google Scholar
Marinelli, KA, Moren, K, Taylor, JS, Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine. Breastfeeding support for mothers in workplace employment or educational settings: summary statement. Breastfeed Med 2013;8(1):137–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolfberg, AJ, Michels, KB, Shields, W, et al. Dads as breastfeeding advocates: results from a randomized controlled trial of an educational intervention. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:708–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine Protocol Committee. ABM Clinical Protocol #21. Guidelines for breastfeeding and the drug-dependent woman. Breastfeed Med 2009;4(4):225–8.PubMed
National Library of Medicine. Drugs and Lactation Database (LactMed). 2010. [Online] Available from: http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/htmlgen?LACT. Accessed on 28 December 2014.
Hale, T. Medications and Mother’s Milk. 16th ed. Plano, TX: Hale Publishing, 2014.Google Scholar
American College of Radiology Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media. Administration of contrast media to breast-feeding mothers. ACR Manual on Contrast Media. [Online] Version 8. 2012:79–80. Available from: www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/acr/contrastmediamanual2012/#/82. Accessed on 28 December 2014.
Lawrence, RM, Circumstances when breastfeeding is contraindicated. Pediatr Clin North Am 2013;60(1):295318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, ER, Anderson, GC, Bergman, N, Downswell, T. Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;5:CD003519.Google Scholar
Behrens, PD. Prenatal, intrapartum, and postpartum support of the lactating mother. Pediatr Clin North Am 2001;48:365–75.Google Scholar
American Academy of Pediatrics and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Breastfeeding Handbook for Physicians. 2nd ed. Elk Grove, IL: AAP, 2013.
Stuebe, A. UNC Protocols, [Online] University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Updated 2012. Available from: http://mombaby.org/PDF/PainProtocols.v3.pdf. Accessed on 28 December 2014.
Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine Protocol Committee, Behrens, P. ABM Protocol #20. Engorgement. Breastfeed Med [Online] 2009;4(2):111–13. Available from: www.bfmed.org/Media/Files/Protocols/Protocol%2020%20-%20Engorgement%206-2009.pdf. Accessed on 14 January 2015.Google Scholar
Amir, L, Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine Protocol Committee. ABM Protocol #4. Mastitis. (Revised March 2014). Breastfeed Med 2014;9(5):239–45. Available from: www.bfmed.org/Media/Files/Protocols/2014_Updated_Mastitis6.30.14.pdf. Accessed on 14 January 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine Protocol Committee. ABM Protocol # 9. Use of galactogues in initiating or augmenting the rate of milk secretion. (First revision January 2011). Breastfeed Med 2011;6(1):41–9. Available from: www.bfmed.org/Media/Files/Protocols/Protocol%209%20-%20English%201st%20Rev.%20Jan%202011.pdf. Accessed on 22 January 2015.PubMed
Morton, J. Maximizing Milk Production with Hands On Pumping [video on the internet]. Stanford University School of Medicine; 2015 [refd 2015 Mar 23]. Available from: http://newborns.stanford.edu/Breastfeeding/MaxProduction.html.
Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine. ABM Clinical Protocol #10. Breastfeeding the late preterm infant (34 0/7 too 36 6/7 weeks). Breastfeed Med 2011;6(3):151–5.
American Academy of Pediatrics. Infant Feeding During Disasters. 2007. Available from: www2.aap.org/breastfeeding/files/pdf/infantnutritiondisaster.pdf. Accessed on 25 January 2015.
Howlader, N, Noone, AM, Krapcho, M, et al., eds. SEER Cancer Stat Fact Sheets. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2014. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts. Accessed 30 September 2014.Google Scholar
Nelson, HD, Fu, R, Goddard, K, et al. Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer: Systematic Review to Update the US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. Evidence synthesis no. 101. AHRQ publication no. 12-05164-EF-1. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2013.
Struewing, JP, Hartge, P, Wacholder, S, et al. The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews. N Engl J Med 1997; 336:1401–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antoniou, A, Pharoah, PD, Narod, S, et al. Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet 2003; 72:1117–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Collaborating Centre for Cancer. Familial breast cancer. In: Classification and care of people at risk of familial breast cancer and management of breast cancer and related risks in people with a family history of breast cancer. London (UK): National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2013 Jun, 57 p. (Clinical guideline; no. 164).PubMed
Moyer, V, US Preventive Services Task Force. Risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer in women: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med 2014; 160(4):271–81.Google Scholar
American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 103: Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113(4):957–66.PubMed
Berry, DA, Iverson, ES Jr, Gudbjartsson, DF, et al. BRCAPRO validation, sensitivity of genetic testing of BRCA1/BRCA2, and prevalence of other breast cancer susceptibility genes. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20:2701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Unger, MA, Nathanson, KL, Calzone, K, et al. Screening for genomic rearrangements in families with breast and ovarian cancer identifies BRCA1 mutations previously missed by conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis or sequencing. Am J Hum Genet. 2000; 67:841–50. [PMID: 10978226]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eggington, JM, Bowles, KR, Moyes, K, et al. A comprehensive laboratory-based program for classification of variants of uncertain significance in hereditary cancer genes. Clin Genet 2014; 86:229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia, C, Lyon, L, Littell, RD, Powell, CB. Comparison of risk management strategies between women testing positive for a BRCA variant of unknown significance and women with known BRCA deleterious mutations. Genet Med 2014 May 22. [Epub ahead of print PMID 24854227]
Ziv, E, Shephard, J, Smith-Bindman, R, Kerlikowske, K. Mammographic breast density and family history of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003; 95(7):556–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warner, E, Messersmith, H, Causer, P, et al. Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 2008; 148(9):671–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia, C, Wendt, J, Lyon, L, et al. Risk management options elected by women after testing positive for a BRCA mutation. Gynecol Oncol 2014 Feb; 132(2):428–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Isaacs, C, Peshkin, B, Schwartz, M, et al. Breast and ovarian cancer screening practices in healthy women with a strong family history of breast or ovarian cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2002; 71:103–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buys, SS, Partridge, E, Black, A, et al. Effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality: the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2011; 305(22):2295–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, MC, Wieand, S, Hale, K, et al. Tamoxifen and breast cancer incidence among women with inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP-P1) Breast Cancer Prevention Trial. JAMA 2001; 286:2251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, HD, Smith, ME, Griffin, JC, Fu, R. Use of medications to reduce risk of primary breast cancer: a systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2013; 158(8)604–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iodice, S, Barile, M, Rotmensz, N, et al. Oral contraceptive use and breast or ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1/2 carriers: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer 2010; 46(12):2275–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rebbeck, TR, Friebel, T, Lynch, HT, et al. Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy reduces breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: the PROSE Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22:1055–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finch, AP, Lubinski, J, Moller, P, et al. Impact of oophorectomy on cancer incidence and mortality in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:1547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Domcheck, SM, Friebel, TM, Singer, CF, et al. Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality. JAMA 2010; 304:967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauff, ND, Domchek, SM, Friebel, TM, et al. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for the prevention of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast and gynecologic cancer: a multicenter, prospective study. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26:1331–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rebbek, TR, Friebel, T, Wagner, T, et al. Effect of short-term hormone replacement therapy on breast cancer risk reduction after bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: the PROSE Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23(31):7804–10.Google Scholar
Lodder, LN, Frets, PG, Trijsburg, RW, et al. One-year follow-up of women opting for presymptomatic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2: emotional impact of the test outcome and decisions on risk management (surveillance or prophylactic surgery). Breast Cancer Res Treat 2002; 73:97112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheuer, L, Kauff, N, Robson, M, et al. Outcome of preventive surgery and screening for breast and ovarian cancer in BRCA mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 2002; 25:1260–8.Google Scholar
Chompret, A, Brugieres, L, Ronsin, M, et al. P53 germline mutations in childhood cancers and cancer risk for carrier individuals. Br J Cancer 2000; 82:1932.Google ScholarPubMed
Olivier, M, Goldgar, DE, Sodha, N, et al. Li-Fraumeni and related syndromes: correlation between tumor type, family structure, and TP53 genotype. Cancer Res 2003; 63:6643.Google ScholarPubMed
Salovaara, R, Loukkola, A, Kristo, P, et al. Population-based molecular detection of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2000; 182:193200.Google Scholar
Giardiello, FM, Allen, JI, Axilbund, JE, et al. AGA Section Guidelines on genetic evaluation and management of Lynch syndrome: a consensus statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2014; 147:502–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasen, HFA, Watson, P, Mecklin, JP, et al. New criteria for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC, Lynch syndrome) proposed by the International Collaborative Group on HNPCC. Gastroenterology 1999; 116:1453–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umar, A, Boland, CR, Terdiman, JP, et al. Revised Bethesda Guidelines for hereditary polyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) and microsatellite instability. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004; 96:261–8.Google Scholar
Dinh, TA, Rosner, BI, Atwood, JK, et al. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of primary genetic screening for Lynch syndrome in the general population. Cancer Prev Res 2010; 4:922.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dove-Edwin, I, Sasieni, P, Adams, J, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopy surveillance in individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer: 16 year, prospective, follow-up study. BMJ 2005; 331:1047.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmeler, KM, Lynch, HT, Chen, LM, et al. Prophylactic surgery to reduce the risk of gynecological cancers in Lynch syndrome. J Engl J Med 2006; 354:261–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, JS, Sun, CC, Peterson, SK, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of prevention strategies for gynecologic cancers in Lynch syndromes. Cancer 2008; 113:326–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wennstrom, J, Pierce, ER, McKusick, VA. Hereditary benign and malignant lesions of the large bowel. Cancer 1974; 34:850.3.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Gastroenterological Association. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement: hereditary colorectal cancer and genetic testing. Gastroenterology 2001; 121:195.CrossRefPubMed
Van Lier, MG, Wagner, A, Mathus-Vliegen, EM, et al. High cancer risk in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome: a systematic review and surveillance recommendations. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105:1258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giardiello, FM, Brensinger, JD, Tersmette, AC, et al. Very high risk of cancer in familial Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Gastroenterology 2000; 119:1447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Health promotion
  • Edited by Martin Olsen, East Tennessee State University, Botros Rizk, University of South Alabama
  • Book: Office Care of Women
  • Online publication: 05 May 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316084380.002
Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

  • Health promotion
  • Edited by Martin Olsen, East Tennessee State University, Botros Rizk, University of South Alabama
  • Book: Office Care of Women
  • Online publication: 05 May 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316084380.002
Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

  • Health promotion
  • Edited by Martin Olsen, East Tennessee State University, Botros Rizk, University of South Alabama
  • Book: Office Care of Women
  • Online publication: 05 May 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316084380.002
Available formats
×