Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-569ts Total loading time: 1.434 Render date: 2022-09-26T14:01:01.894Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Book contents

Chapter 41 - Neurologic Deficits Following a Primary Elective Cesarean Delivery under Spinal Anesthesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2019

Tauqeer Husain
Ashford and St Peter’s NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey
Roshan Fernando
Womens Wellness and Research Centre, Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar
Scott Segal
Wake Forest University, North Carolina
Get access


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Obstetric Anesthesiology
An Illustrated Case-Based Approach
, pp. 228 - 233
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Brull, R, McCartney, CJL, Chan, VWS, El-Beheiry, H. Neurological complications after regional anesthesia: contemporary estimates of risk. Anesth Analg 2007; 104:965–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, TM, Counsell, D, Wildsmith, JAW, Royal College of Anaesthetists. Major complications of central neuraxial block: report on the Third National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102:179–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingwell, SP, Curt, A, Dvorak, MF. Factors affecting neurological outcome in traumatic conus medullaris and cauda equina injuries. Neurosurg Focus 2008; 25:e7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boon, JM, Abrahams, PH, Meiring, JH, Welch, T. Lumbar puncture: anatomical review of a clinical skill. Clin Anat 2004; 17:544–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomson, A. Fifth annual report of the Committee of Collective Investigation of the Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland for the year 1893–94. J Anat Physiol 1894; 29:3560.Google Scholar
Reynolds, F. Damage to the conus medullaris following spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 2001; 56:238–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pysyk, CL, Persaud, D, Bryson, GL, Lui, A. Ultrasound assessment of the vertebral level of the palpated intercristal (Tuffier’s) line. Can J Anaesth 2010; 57:4649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Srinivasan, KK, Deighan, M, Crowley, L, McKeating, K. Spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: an ultrasound comparison of two different landmark techniques. Int J Obstet Anesth 2014; 23:206–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broadbent, CR, Maxwell, WB, Ferrie, R, et al. Ability of anaesthetists to identify a marked lumbar interspace. Anaesthesia 2000; 55:1122–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neal, JM, Bernards, CM, Hadzic, A, et al. ASRA practice advisory on neurologic complications in regional anesthesia and pain medicine. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2008; 33:404–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sorenson, EJ. Neurological injuries associated with regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2008; 33:442–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huntley, JS. Neurapraxia and not neuropraxia. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67:430–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, WW. Evaluation and management of peripheral nerve injury. Clin Neurophysiol 2008; 119:1951–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsen, LC. Neurologic complications of labor analgesia and anesthesia. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2002; 40:6788.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Podnar, S. Epidemiology of cauda equina and conus medullaris lesions. Muscle Nerve 2007; 35:529–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, F. Logic in the safe practice of spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 2000; 55:1045–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bogod, D. Keeping in the Reynolds zone. Int J Obstet Anesth 2014; 23:201–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saifuddin, A, Burnett, SJ, White, J. The variation of position of the conus medullaris in an adult population: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Spine 1998; 23:1452–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats