Wu, S, Kocherginsky, M, Hibbard, JU. Abnormal placentation: twenty-year analysis. Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;192(5):1458–61.Google Scholar

Jauniaux, ERM, Alfirevic, Z, Bhide, AG, et al. on behalf of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Placenta Praevia and Placenta Accreta: Diagnosis and Management. Green-top guideline No. 27a. London: RCOG, 2018.Google Scholar

Doumouchtsis, SK, Arulkumaran, S. The morbidly adherent placenta: an overview of management options. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand. 2010;89(9):1126–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chandraharan, E, Rao, S, Belli, AM, Arulkumaran, S. The triple P procedure as a conservative surgical alternative to peripartum hysterectomy for placenta percreta. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;117(2):191–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pinas-Carrillo, A, Chandraharan, E. Management of morbidly adherent placenta. Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med. 2016;26:283–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sentilhes, L, Kayem, G, Chandraharan, E, Palacios-Jaraquemada, J, Jauniaux, E; FIGO Placenta Accreta Diagnosis and Management Expert Consensus Panel. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: conservative management. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;140(3):291–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Teixidor Viñas, M, Belli, AM, Arulkumaran, S, Chandraharan, E. Prevention of postpartum hemorrhage and hysterectomy in patients with morbidly adherent placenta: a cohort study comparing outcomes before and after introduction of the Triple-P procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(3):350–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pinas-Carrillo, A, Bhide, A, Moore, J, et al. Outcomes of the first 50 patients with abnormally invasive placenta managed using the ‘triple P procedure’ conservative surgical approach. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020;148(1):65–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wei, Y, Cao, Y, Yu, Y, Wang, Z. Evaluation of a modified triple-P” procedure in women with morbidly adherent placenta after previous caesarean section. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;296(4):737–43. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-017-4447-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Piñas Carrillo, A, Chandraharan, E. Placenta accreta spectrum: risk factors, diagnosis and management with special reference to the triple P procedure. Womens Health (Lond). 2019;15:1745506519878081. DOI: 10.1177/1745506519878081.Google Scholar

Lanoix, R, Akkapeddi, V, Goldfeder, B. Perimortem cesarean section: case reports and recommendations. Acad Emerg Med. 1995;2:1063.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Katz, VL, Dotters, DJ, Droegemueller, W. Perimortem cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;68(4):571–6.Google ScholarPubMed

Bowers, W, Wagner, C. Field perimortem cesarean section. Air Med J. 2001;20:10–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Marx, GF. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation of late-pregnant women. Anesthesiology. 1982;56:156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH). Saving mothers’ lives: Reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer – 2003–2005. The Seventh Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. London: CEMACH, 2007.Google Scholar

Howell, C, Grady, K, Cox, C. Managing Obstetric Emergencies and Trauma: The MOET Course Manual, 2nd ed. London: RCOG, 2007.Google Scholar

Whitten, M, Montgomery, L. Post-mortem and perimortem caesarean section: what are the indications? J Royal Soc Med. 2000;93:6–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Capobianco, G, Balata, A, Mannazzu, MC, et al. Perimortem cesarean delivery 30 min after a laboring patient jumped from a fourth-floor window: baby survives and is normal at age 4 years. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:e15–e16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oates, S, Williams, GL, Rees, GAD. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in late pregnancy. Br Med J. 1988;297:404–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

O’Connor, RL, Sevarino, FB. Cardiopulmonary arrest in the pregnant patient: a report of a successful resuscitation. J Clin Anesth. 1994;6:66–8.Google Scholar

Page-Rodriguez, A, Gonzalez-Sanchez, JA. Perimortem caesarean section of a twin pregnancy: case report and review of the literature. Acad Emerg Med. 1999;6:1072–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Parker, J, Balis, N, Chester, S, Adey, D. Cardiopulmonary arrest in pregnancy: successful resuscitation of mother and infant following immediate cesarean section in labour ward. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;36:207–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Yeomans, ER, Gilstrap, LC. Physiologic changes in pregnancy and their impact on critical care. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(10):S256–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dijkman, A, Huisman, C, Smit, M, et al. Cardiac arrest in pregnancy: increasing use of perimortem caesarean section due to emergency skills training? Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;117:282–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Warraich, Q, Esen, U. For perimortem caesarean section, the surgical knife is the most important instrument. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;117:768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Katz, V, Balderston, K, DeFreest, M. Perimortem cesarean delivery: were our assumptions correct? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:1916–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

American Heart Association. The American Heart Association Guidelines 2005 for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular Care. Part 10.8: cardiac arrest associated with pregnancy. Circulation. 2005;112:IV150–3.Google Scholar

Mallampalli, A, Powner, DJ, Gardner, MO. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and somatic support of the pregnant patient. Crit Care Clin. 2004;20:747–61.Google Scholar

Beckett, VA, Knight, M, Sharpe, P. The CAPS Study: incidence, management and outcomes of cardiac arrest in pregnancy in the UK: a prospective, descriptive study. BJOG. 2017;124:1374–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chu, JJ, Hinshaw, K, Paterson-Brown, S. Perimortem caesarean section: why, when and how. Obstetrician & Gynaecologist. 2018;20:151–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Costeloe, KL, Hennessy, EM, Haider, S, et al., Short term outcomes after extreme preterm birth in England: comparison of two birth cohorts in 1995 and 2006 (the EPICure studies). 2012;345:e7976.Google ScholarPubMed

Hodek, J-M, von der Schulenburg, JM, Mittendorf, T. Measuring economic consequences of preterm birth: methodological recommendations for the evaluation of personal burden on children and their caregivers. Health Econ Rev. 2011;1(1):6–39.Google Scholar

Romero, R. Espinoza, J, Kusanovic, JP, et al. The preterm parturition syndrome. BJOG. 2006;113(Suppl 3):17–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Iams, JD, Berghella, V. Care for women with prior preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(2):89–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kyrgiou, M, Athanasiou, A, Paraskevaidi, M, et al. Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2016;354:i3633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Watson, HA, Carter, J, David, AL, et al. Full dilation cesarean section: a risk factor for recurrent second-trimester loss and preterm birth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(9):1100–5.Google Scholar

Sarri, G., Davies, M, Gholitabar, M, et al. Preterm labour: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ. 2015;351:h6283.Google Scholar

Varley-Campbell, J., Mújica-Mota, R, Coelho, H, et al. Three biomarker tests to help diagnose preterm labour: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2019;23(13):1–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kuhrt, K., Hezelgrave, N, Foster, C, et al. Development and validation of a tool incorporating quantitative fetal fibronectin to predict spontaneous preterm birth in symptomatic women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(2):210–16.Google ScholarPubMed

Watson, HA, Carter, J, Seed, PT, et al. The QUiPP App: a safe alternative to a treat-all strategy for threatened preterm labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50(3): 342–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liggins, GC, Howie, RN. A controlled trial of antepartum glucocorticoid treatment for prevention of the respiratory distress syndrome in premature infants. Pediatrics. 1972;50(4):515–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Roberts, D, Dalziel, S. Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006(3):CD004454.Google ScholarPubMed

Soe, A., David, ALM, Costoloe, K, et al. Perinatal management of pregnant women at the threshold of infant viability (the obstetric perspective). RCOG Scientific Impact Paper. 2014;1:1–15.Google Scholar

Crowther, CA, McKinlay, CJD, Middleton, P, Harding, JE. Repeat doses of prenatal corticosteroids for women at risk of preterm birth for improving neonatal health outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015(7).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rodriguez, A, Wang, Y, Khan, AA, et al. Antenatal corticosteroid therapy (ACT) and size at birth: a population-based analysis using the Finnish Medical Birth Register. PLOS Med. 2019;16(2):e1002746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Crowther, CA, Middleton, PF, Voysey, M, et al. Assessing the neuroprotective benefits for babies of antenatal magnesium sulphate: an individual participant data meta-analysis. PLOS Med. 2017;14(10):e1002398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

van Vliet, EOG, Nijman, TAJ, Schuit, E, et al. Nifedipine versus atosiban for threatened preterm birth (APOSTEL III): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10033):2117–24.Google Scholar

Kenyon, S., Taylor, DJ, Tarnow-Mordi, WO, et al. ORACLE–antibiotics for preterm prelabour rupture of the membranes: short-term and long-term outcomes. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2002;91(437):12–15.Google ScholarPubMed

Hughes, RG, Brocklehurst, P, Steer, PJ, et al. Prevention of early-onset neonatal group B streptococcal disease. BJOG. 2017;124(12):e280–e305.Google Scholar

Kenyon, S, Brocklehurst, P, Jones, D, et al. MRC ORACLE Children Study. Long term outcomes following prescription of antibiotics to pregnant women with either spontaneous preterm labour or preterm rupture of the membranes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2008;8:14–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Watson, S.I., Arulampalam, W, Petrou, S, et al. The effects of designation and volume of neonatal care on mortality and morbidity outcomes of very preterm infants in England: retrospective population-based cohort study. BMJ Open. 2014;4(7):e004856.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brown, R, Gagnon, R, Delisle, MF. Guideline No. 373.Cervical insufficiency and cervical cerclage. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019;41(2):233–47.Google ScholarPubMed

Althuisius, SM, Dekker GA, Hummel P, et al. Cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial: emergency cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(4):907–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stupin, JH, David M, Siedentopf J-P, et al. Emergency cerclage versus bed rest for amniotic sac prolapse before 27 gestational weeks: a retrospective, comparative study of 161 women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;139(1):32–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oh, KJ, Romero R, Park JY, et al. Evidence that antibiotic administration is effective in the treatment of a subset of patients with intra-amniotic infection/inflammation presenting with cervical insufficiency. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(2):P140.E1–140.E18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Locatelli, A, Vergani P, Bellini P, et al. Amnioreduction in emergency cerclage with prolapsed membranes: comparison of two methods for reducing the membranes. Am J Perinatol. 1999;16(2):73–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schiff, E, Friedman, SA, Zolti, M, et al. A matched controlled study of Kielland’s forceps for transverse arrest of the fetal vertex. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;21(6):576–9.Google Scholar

Majoko, F, Gardener, G. Trial of instrumental delivery in theatre versus immediate caesarean section for anticipated difficult assisted births. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;10:CD005545.Google ScholarPubMed

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. London: RCOG Press; 2001 www.rcog.org.uk/files/rcog-corp/uploadedfiles/nscs_audit.pdf. 2. Information and Statistics.Google Scholar

Division, Scottish Health Statistics. Births in Scotland report 2002. Births and babies (Births 1976–2008). www.isdscotland.org/isd/1612.htmlGoogle Scholar

Melamed, N, Segev, M, Hadar, E, Peled, Y, Wiznitzer, A, Yogev, Y. Outcome of trial of labor after cesarean section in women with past failed operative vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(1):49.e1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

O’Mahony, F, Hofmeyr, GJ, Menon, V. Choice of instruments for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(11):CD005455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. College Statement C-Obs 16: Instrumental vaginal delivery. Melbourne, Australia: RANZCOG; 2009. www.ranzcog.edu.au/publications/statements/C-obs16.pdfGoogle Scholar

Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. College Statement C-Obs 13: Guidelines for use of rotational forceps. Melbourne, Australia: RANZCOG; 2009, www.ranzcog.edu.au/publications/statements/CGoogle Scholar

Murphy, DJ, Liebling, RE, Patel, R, Verity, L, Swingler, R. Cohort study of operative delivery in the second stage of labour and standard of obstetric care. BJOG. 2003;110(6):610–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Murphy, DJ, Liebling, RE, Verity, L, Swingler, R, Patel, R. Early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in second stage of labour: a cohort study. Lancet. 2001;358(9289):1203–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McDonnell, S, Chandraharan, E. Determinants and outcomes of emergency caesarean section following failed instrumental delivery: 5-Year observational review at a tertiary referral centre in London. J Pregnancy. 2015;2015:627810.Google Scholar

Tahir, N, Chandraharan, E. Emergency caesarean sections following a failed instrumental delivery: maternal and perinatal outcomes. In Book of Abstracts. European Congress on Intrapartum Care. Stockholm, 2017.Google Scholar

Ramphul, M, Ooi, PV, Burke, G, Kennelly, MM, Said, SA, Montgomery, AA, Murphy, DJ. Instrumental delivery and ultrasound: a multicentre randomised controlled trial of ultrasound assessment of the fetal head position versus standard care as an approach to prevent morbidity at instrumental delivery. BJOG. 2014;121(8):1029–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar