Bibliography

Abramowski, L., 1983 ‘Nag Hammadi 8,1 “Zostrianos”, das Anonymum Brucianum, Plotin Enn. 2,9 (33)’, in Blume, H.-D. and Mann, F. (eds.), Platonismus und Christentum: Festschrift für Heinrich Dörrie (Aschendorff), 1–10.Google Scholar

Adamson, P., 2002 The Arabic Plotinus (Bloomsbury).Google Scholar

Adamson, P., 2011 ‘Making a Virtue of Necessity: Anangkê in Plato and Plotinus’, Études platoniciennes 8: 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adamson, P., 2014 ‘Freedom, Providence and Fate’, in Remes, P. and Slaveva-Griffin, S. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism (Routledge), 437–52.Google Scholar

Adamson, P., 2021 ‘From Known to Knower: Affinity Arguments for the Mind’s Incorporeality in the Islamic World’, in U. Kriegel (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Mind Volume 1 (Oxford University Press), 373–96.Google Scholar

Afonasin, E. V., Dillon, J. M., and Finamore, J. F. (eds.), 2012 Iamblichus and the Foundations of Late Platonism (Brill).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Algra, K., 1994 Concepts of Space in Greek Thought (Brill).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amado, É., 1953 ‘A propos des nombres nombrés et des nombres nombrants chez Plotin’, Revue Philosophique 78: 423–5.Google Scholar

Annas, J., 1976 Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Books M and N (Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Annas, J., 1999 Platonic Ethics: Old and New (Cornell University Press).Google Scholar

Annas, J., 2011 ‘Practical Expertise’, in Bengson, J. and Moffett, M. A. (eds.), Knowing How: Essays on Knowledge, Mind, and Action (Oxford University Press), 101–12.Google Scholar

Armstrong, A. H., 1940 The Architecture of the Intelligible Universe in the Philosophy of Plotinus (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Armstrong, A. H., 1960 ‘The Background of the Doctrine “That the Intelligibles Are Not Outside the Intellect”’, in Les sources de Plotin. Entretiens sur l’Antiquité Classique, vol. 5 (Fondation Hardt), 393–413.Google Scholar

Armstrong, A. H. (ed. and trans.), 1966–88 Plotinus, 7 vols. (Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Armstrong, A. H., 1967 ‘Plotinus’, in Armstrong, A. H. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armstrong, A. H., 1974 ‘Tradition, Reason and Experience in the Thought of Plotinus’, in Plotino e il Neoplatonismo in Oriente e in Occidente, Atti del Convegno internazionale dell’ Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei (Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei), 171–94 [reprinted in Armstrong 1979].Google Scholar

Armstrong, A. H., 1979 Plotinian and Christian Studies (Variorum).Google Scholar

Armstrong, A. H. (ed. and trans.), 1984 Plotinus: Ennead V (Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Atkinson, M., 1983 Ennead V.1: On the Three Principal Hypostases: A Commentary with Translation (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Aubenque, P., 1971 ‘Plotin et le dépassement de l’ontologie grecque classique’, in Schuhl, P.-M. and Hadot, P. (eds.), Le Néoplatonisme (Éditions du CNRS), 101–11.Google Scholar

Aubry, G. (ed. and trans.), 2004 Plotin: Traité 53 (I,1): Introduction, traduction, commentaire et notes (Éditions du Cerf).Google Scholar

Aubry, G., 2007 ‘Conscience, pensée et connaissance de soi selon Plotin: Le double héritage de l’Alcibiade et du Charmide’, Études platoniciennes 4: 163–81.Google Scholar

Aubry, G., 2009 ‘“L’empreinte du Bien dans le multiple”: Structure et constitution de l’Intellect plotinien’, Les Études philosophiques 90 (3): 313–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aubry, G., 2014a ‘“Comprendre et se taire”: Plotin et les discours du silence’, in Boulègue, L., Caye, P., Malhomme, F., and Perceau, S. (eds.), Silence et sagesse. De la musique à la métaphysique: les anciens Grecs et leur heritage (Classiques Garnier), 273–91.Google Scholar

Aubry, G., 2014b ‘Metaphysics of Soul and Self in Plotinus’, in Remes, P. and Slaveva-Griffin, S. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism (Routledge), 310–22.Google Scholar

Aubry, G., 2016 ‘Plato, Plotinus and Neoplatonism’, in Magee, G. A. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Western Mysticism and Esotericism (Cambridge University Press), 38–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aubry, G., 2018 Genèse du Dieu souverain. Archéologie de la puissance II (J. Vrin).Google Scholar

Aubry, G., 2020a ‘An Alternative to Cartesianism? Plotinus’s Self and Its Posterity in Ralph Cudworth’, in Leigh, F. (ed.), Self-Knowledge in Ancient Philosophy, The Eighth Keeling Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy (Oxford University Press), 210–29.Google Scholar

Aubry, G., 2020b Dieu sans la puissance: Dunamis et energeia chez Aristote et chez Plotin. Archéologie de la puissance I, rev. ed. (J. Vrin).Google Scholar

Aubry, G., 2021 ‘De l’être comme acte à la puissance d’être: Enquête sur un tournant ontologique (Aristote-Plotin-Proclus)’, in Hoffmann, P., Lecerf, A., and Casas, G. (eds.), Essence, puissance, activité dans la philosophie et les savoirs grecs (Classiques Garnier), in press.Google Scholar

Baltes, M., 1996 ‘Ideen (Ideenlehre)’, in E. Dassmann, H. Brakmann, C. Colpe, A. Dihle, J. Engemann, K. Hoheisel, W. Speyer, K. Thraede, and T. Klauser (eds.), Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum, vol. 17 (Hiersemann), 213–46.Google Scholar

Baltes, M., 1998 Der Platonismus in der Antike, vol. 5 (Frommann-Holzboog).Google Scholar

Baltes, M., 1999 ‘Is the Idea of the Good in Plato’s Republic Beyond Being?’, in Lakmann, M.-L., Hüffmeier, A., and Vorwerk, M. (eds.), Dianoemata: Kleine Schriften zu Platon und zum Platonismus (B. G. Teubner), 351–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baltes, M., 2001 ‘Ammonios Sakkas’, in T. Klauser, E. Dassmann, and H. Brakmann (eds.), Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum, suppl. vol. 1 (Hiersemann), 323–32.Google Scholar

Baltussen, J., 2008 Philosophy and Exegesis in Simplicius: The Methodology of a Commentator (Duckworth).Google Scholar

Baltzly, D., 2004 ‘The Virtues and “Becoming Like God”: Alcinous to Proclus’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 26: 297–321.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (ed. and trans.), 2003 Porphyry: Introduction (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Becker, M. (ed. and trans.), 2016 Porphyrios, ‘Contra Christianos’: Neue Sammlung der Fragmente, Testimonien und Dubia mit Einleitung, Übersetzung und Anmerkungen (De Gruyter).Google Scholar

Beierwaltes, W., 1981 Plotin: Über Ewigkeit und Zeit (Enneade III 7), 3rd ed. (Klostermann).Google Scholar

Beierwaltes, W., 1991a Pensare l’Uno: Studi sulla filosofia neoplatonica e sulla storia dei suoi influssi, trans. M. L. Gatti (Vita e Pensiero).Google Scholar

Beierwaltes, W., 1991b Selbsterkenntnis und Erfahrung der Einheit: Plotins Enneade V 3 (Klostermann).Google Scholar

Beierwaltes, W., 2001 Das wahre Selbst: Studien zu Plotins Begriff des Geistes und des Einen (Klostermann).Google Scholar

Bene, L., 2013 ‘Ethics and Metaphysics in Plotinus’, in Karfík, F. and Song, E. (eds.), Plato Revived: Essays on Ancient Platonism in Honour of Dominic J. O’Meara (De Gruyter), 141–61.Google Scholar

Blumenthal, H. J., 1966 ‘Did Plotinus Believe in Ideas of Individuals?’, Phronesis 11 (1): 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blumenthal, H. J., 1968 ‘Plotinus Ennead IV.3.20–1 and Its Sources: Alexander, Aristotle and Others’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 50 (3): 254–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blumenthal, H. J., 1971 Plotinus’ Psychology (Martinus Nijhoff).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blumenthal, H. J., 1972 ‘Plotinus’ Psychology: Aristotle in the Service of Platonism’, International Philosophical Quarterly 12 (3): 340–64 [reprinted in Blumenthal 1993].CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blumenthal, H. J., 1974 ‘Nous and Soul in Plotinus: Some Problems of Demarcation’, in Plotino e il Neoplatonismo in Oriente e in Occidente, Atti del Convegno internazionale dell’ Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei (Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei), 203–19 [reprinted in Blumenthal 1993].Google Scholar

Blumenthal, H. J., 1984 ‘Plotinus Ennead I.2.7.5: A Different Hapax’, Mnemosyne 37: 89–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blumenthal, H. J., 1993 Soul and Intellect: Studies in Plotinus and Later Platonism (Variorum).Google Scholar

Blumenthal, H. J., 1996 ‘On Soul and Intellect’, in Gerson, L. P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus (Cambridge University Press), 82–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonazzi, M., 2015 À la recherche des idées: Platonisme et philosophie hellénistique d’Antiochus à Plotin (J. Vrin).Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M., 2017 ‘The Platonist Appropriation of Stoic Epistemology’, in Engberg-Pedersen, T. (ed.), From Stoicism to Platonism: The Development of Philosophy, 100 BCE–100 CE (Cambridge University Press), 120–41.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G., 2007 ‘“Middle” Platonists on Fate and Human Autonomy’, in Sorabji, R. and Sharples, R. W. (eds.), Greek and Roman Philosophy 100 BC – 200 AD, vol. 2 (Institute of Classical Studies), 431–47.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G., 2018 Platonist Philosophy, 80 BC to AD 250: An Introduction and Collection of Sources in Translation (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Bréhier, É., 1919 ‘L’idée du néant et le problème de l’origine radicale dans le néoplatonisme grec’, Revue de métaphysique et de morale 26 (4): 443–75.Google Scholar

Bréhier, É. (ed. and trans.), 1924–38 Plotin: Ennéades, 7 vols. (Les Belles Lettres).Google Scholar

Bréhier, É. (ed. and trans.), 1927 Plotin: Ennéades IV (Les Belles Lettres).Google Scholar

Bréhier, É., 1958 The Philosophy of Plotinus, trans. J. Thomas (Chicago University Press).Google Scholar

Brisson, L., 1998 Le Même et l’Autre dans la Structure Ontologique du Timée de Platon: Un commentaire systématique du Timée de Platon, 3rd rev. ed. (Academia).Google Scholar

Brisson, L., 1999 ‘Logos et logoi chez Plotin. Leur nature et leur rôle’, Les Cahiers philosophiques de Strasbourg 8: 87–108.Google Scholar

Brisson, L., 2000 ‘Εntre physique et métaphysique. Le terme ὄγκος chez Plotin, dans ses rappοrts avec la matière (ὕλη) et le corps (σῶμα)’, in Fattal, Michel (ed.), Études sur Plotin (L’Harmattan), 87–111.Google Scholar

Brisson, L., 2002 ‘L’approche traditionnelle de Platon par H. F. Cherniss’, in Reale, G. and Scolnicov, S. (eds.), New Images of Plato: Dialogues on the Idea of the Good (Academia), 85–97.Google Scholar

Brisson, L., 2005 ‘Peut-on parler d’union mystique chez Plotin?’, in Dierkens, A. and Beyer de Ryke, B. (eds.), Mystique: la passion de l’Un, de l’Antiquité à nos jours (Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles), 61–72.Google Scholar

Brisson, L., 2017–18 ‘Sur le Bien de Platon: Métamorphose d’une anecdote’, Chora: Revued’études anciennes et médiévales 15–16: 167–80.Google Scholar

Brisson, L. and Pradeau, J.-F. (eds.), 2002–10 Plotin: Traités, 9 vols. (GF Flammarion).Google Scholar

Brisson, L., Aubry, G., Congourdeau, M.-H., and Hudry, F. (eds.), 2012 Porphyre: Sur la manière dont l’embryon reçoit l’âme (J. Vrin).Google Scholar

Brisson, L., Cherlonneix, J.-L., Goulet-Cazé, M.-O., Goulet, R., Grmek, M. D., Flamand, J.-M., Matton, S., Pépin, J., Saffrey, H. D., Segonds, A.-P., Tardieu, M., and Thillet, P. (eds. and trans.), 1992 Porphyre: La Vie de Plotin II, Histoire des doctrines de l’antiquité classique 16 (J. Vrin).Google Scholar

Brisson, L. (ed.), 2005 Porphyre: Sentences, 2 vols., Histoire des doctrines de l’antiquité Classique, trans. J. M. Dillon (J. Vrin).Google Scholar

Brisson, L., O’Neill, S., and Timotin, A. (eds.), 2018 Neoplatonic Demons and Angels (Brill).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brittain, C., 2003 ‘Colloquium 7: Attention Deficit in Plotinus and Augustine: Psychological Problems in Christian and Platonist Theories of the Grades of Virtue’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 18 (1): 223–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruns, I. (ed.), 1887 Alexander of Aphrodisias: De anima liber cum mantissa (G. Reimer).Google Scholar

Brunschwig, J. (ed. and trans.), 1967 Aristote: Topiques (Livres I–IV) (Les Belles Lettres).Google Scholar

Brunschwig, J., 1971 ‘EE I 8, 1218a15–32 et le περὶ τἀγαθοῦ’, in Moraux, P. and Harlfinger, D. (eds.), Untersuchungen zur Eudemischen Ethik: Akten des 5. Symposium Aristotelicum (De Gruyter), 197–222.Google Scholar

Brunschwig, J., 1986 ‘Aristotle on Arguments without Winners or Losers’, Wissenschaftskolleg Berlin, Jahrbuch 1984/5: 31–40.Google Scholar

Burnet, J. (ed.), 1900–7 Platonis Opera, 5 vols. (Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Burns, D. M., 2014 Apocalypse of the Alien God: Platonism and the Exile of Sethian Gnosticism (University of Pennsylvania Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burns, D. M., 2017 ‘Judges of the Moon and Stars: More Material Shared between Zostrianos (NHC VIII,1) and The Untitled Work in the Bruce Codex’, in DiTommaso, L., Henze, M., and Adler, W. (eds.), The Embroidered Bible: Studies in Biblical Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha in Honour of Michael E. Stone (Brill), 285–300.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. F., 1987 ‘Platonism and Mathematics: A Prelude to Discussion’, in Graeser, A. (ed.), Mathematics and Metaphysics in Aristotle (Paul Haupt), 213–40.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. F., 1995 ‘How Much Happens When Aristotle Sees Red and Hears Middle C? Remarks on De Anima 2. 7–8’, in Nussbaum, M. C. and Oksenberg Rorty, A. (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima, 2nd edn. (Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. F., 2002 ‘De Anima II 5’, Phronesis 47: 28–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bussanich, J., 1988 The One and Its Relation to Intellect in Plotinus (Brill).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bussanich, J., 1994 ‘Mystical Elements in the Thought of Plotinus’, in Haase, W. and Temporini, H. (eds.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, vol. 2, 36.7 (De Gruyter), 5300–30.Google Scholar

Bussanich, J., 1996 ‘Plotinus’s Metaphysics of the One’, in Gerson, L. P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus (Cambridge University Press), 38–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bywater, L. (ed.), 1894 Aristotle: Ethica nicomachea (Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Calma, D. (ed.), 2019 Reading Proclus and the Book of Causes Volume 1: Western Scholarly Networks and Debates (Brill).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calma, D. (ed.), 2020 Reading Proclus and the Book of Causes Volume 2: Translations and Acculturations (Brill).Google Scholar

Calma, D. (ed.), 2021. Reading Proclus Volume 3: on Causes and the Noetic Triad (Brill).Google Scholar

Caluori, D., 2005 ‘The Essential Functions of a Plotinian Soul’, Rhizai 2 (1): 75–93.Google Scholar

Caluori, D., 2008 ‘Plotin: Was fühlt der Leib? Was empfindet die Seele?’, in Landweer, H. and Renz, U. (eds.), Klassische Emotionstheorien: Von Platon bis Wittgenstein (De Gruyter).Google Scholar

Caluori, D., 2015a Plotinus on the Soul (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caluori, D., 2015b ‘Divine Practical Thought in Plotinus’, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 26: 55–77.Google Scholar

R. P., Casey, 1935 ‘The Study of Gnosticism’, The Journal of Theological Studies 36 (141): 45–60.Google Scholar

Castelli, L., 2020 ‘Aristotle’s Categories’, Oxford Bibliographies Online, accessed 2021, http://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780195389661-0347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caston, V., 1999 ‘Something and Nothing: The Stoics on Concepts and Universals’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 17: 145–213.Google Scholar

Catapano, G., 1995 Epékeina tês philosophías: L’eticità del filosofare in Plotino (CLEUP).Google Scholar

Catapano, G., 2006 ‘Alle origini della dottrina dei gradi di virtù: Il trattato 19 di Plotino (Enn., I 2)’, Medioevo 31: 9–28.Google Scholar

Centrone, B., 2014 ‘The Pseudo-Pythagorean Writings’, in Huffman, C. A. (ed.), A History of Pythagoreanism (Cambridge University Press), 315–40.Google Scholar

Charles, A., Bertier, J., Brisson, L., Charles, A., Pépin, J., Saffrey, H.-D., and Segonds, A.-P. (eds. and trans.), 1980 Plotin: Traité sur les nombres (Ennéade VI 6 [34]) (J. Vrin) [reprinted in A. Charles-Saget, 1982 L’Architecture du divin: mathématique et philosophie chez Plotin et Proclus (Les Belles Lettres)].Google Scholar

Chase, M. (ed. and trans.), 2003 Simplicius: On Aristotle Categories 1–4 (Bloomsbury).Google Scholar

Charrue, J. M., 1978 Plotin lecteur de Platone (Les Belles Lettres).Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R., 2002 Sostanza, movimento, analogia. Plotino critico di Aristotele (Bibliopolis).Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R., 2003 ‘Il tempo misura del movimento? Plotino e Aristotele (Enn. III 7 [45])’, in Bonazzi, M and Trabattoni, F (eds.), Platone e la tradizione platonica: Studi di filosofia antica (Cisalpino), 221–50.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R., 2004 ‘The Categories and the Status of the Physical World: Plotinus and the Neo-Platonic Commentators’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 47 (83): 121–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiaradonna, R., 2005 ‘La dottrina dell’anima non discesa in Plotino e la conoscenza degli intelligibili’, in Canone, E. (ed.), Per una storia del concetto di mente (Olschki), 27–49.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R., 2009a Plotino (Carocci).Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R., 2009b ‘Le traité de Galien Sur la démonstration et sa postérité tardo-antique’, in Chiaradonna, R. and Trabattoni, F. (eds.), Physics and Philosophy of Nature in Greek Neoplatonism (Brill), 43–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiaradonna, R., 2010 ‘La conoscenza dell’anima discorsiva: Enn. V 3 (49) 2–3’, in Barbanti, M. and Cardullo, R. L. (eds.), Anima e libertà in Plotino (CUECM), 36–64.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R., 2012a ‘Plotinus’ Account of the Cognitive Powers of the Soul: Sense-Perception and Discursive Thought’, Topoi 31 (2): 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiaradonna, R., 2012b ‘Plotino su pensiero, estensione e percezione sensibile: Un dualismo “cartesiano”?’, in Chiaradonna, R. (ed.), Il platonismo e le scienze (Carocci), 81–99.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R., 2014a ‘Substance’, in Remes, P. and Slaveva-Griffin, S. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism (Routledge), 216–30.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R., 2014b ‘Plotinus on Sensible Particulars and Individual Essences’, in Torrance, A. and Zachhuber, J. (eds.), Individuality in Late Antiquity (Routledge), 47–61.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R., 2014c ‘Plotinus’ Metaphorical Reading of the Timaeus: Soul, Mathematics, Providence’, in d’Hoine, P. and van Riel, G. (eds.), Fate, Providence and Moral Responsibility in Ancient, Medieval and Early Modern Thought: Studies in Honour of Carlos Steel (Leuven University Press), 187–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiaradonna, R., 2015 ‘Plotinus’ Account of Demiurgic Causation and Its Philosophical Background’, in Marmodoro, A. and Prince, B. D. (eds.), Causation and Creation in Late Antiquity (Cambridge University Press), 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiaradonna, R., 2016 ‘Are There Qualities in Intelligible Being? On Plotinus VI.2 [43] 14’, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 27: 43–63.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R., 2019 ‘Plotinus on Memory, Recollection and Discursive Thought’, in Castagnoli, L. and Ceccarelli, P. (eds.), Greek Memories: Theories and Practices (Cambridge University Press), 310–24.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R., 2021 ‘Ethics and the Hierarchy of Virtues from Plotinus to Iamblichus’, in Xenophontos, S. and Marmodoro, A. (eds.), The Reception of Greek Ethics in Late Antiquity and Byzantium (Cambridge University Press), 36–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiaradonna, R., 2022, ‘Athroa Epibolē: Galen as a Source for Plotinus, 3.7(45)’, Méthexis 34: 109–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiaradonna, R., forthcoming ‘Plotinus on Hylomorphic Forms’, in Charles, D. (ed.), Hylomorphism: Aristotle to Boyle (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. and Rashed, M. (eds.), 2020 Boéthos de Sidon: Exégète d’Aristote et philosophe (De Gruyter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiaradonna, R., Rashed, M., Sedley, D., and Tchernetska, N., 2013 ‘A Rediscovered Categories Commentary’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 44: 129–94.Google Scholar

Chlup, R., 2012 Proclus: An Introduction (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chrétien, J.-L., 1980‘Le Bien donne ce qu’il n’a pas’, Archives de philosophie 43 (2): 263–77.Google Scholar

Ciapalo, R. T., 1997 ‘The Relation of Plotinian Eudaimonia to the Life of the Serious Man in Treatise I 4 [46]’, American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 71 (3): 489–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cleary, J. J., 1995 Aristotle and Mathematics: Aporetic Method in Cosmology and Metaphysics (Brill).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collette-Dučić, B., 2007 Plotin et l’ordonnancement de l’Être: Étude sur les fondements et les limites de la détermination (J. Vrin).Google Scholar

Coope, U., 2020 Freedom and Responsibility in Neoplatonist Thought (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cornea, A., 2016 ‘Athroa epibolê: On an Epicurean Formula in Plotinus’ Work’, in Longo, A. and Taormina, D. P. (eds.), Plotinus and Epicurus: Matter, Perception, Pleasure (Cambridge University Press), 177–88.Google Scholar

Corrigan, K., 1986 ‘Is There More Than One Generation of Matter in the Enneads?’, Phronesis 31 (2): 167–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corrigan, K., 1996a ‘Essence and Existence in the Enneads’, in Gerson, L. P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus (Cambridge University Press), 105–29.Google Scholar

Corrigan, K., 1996b Plotinus’ Theory of Matter-Evil and the Question of Substance: Plato, Aristotle, and Alexander of Aphrodisias (Peeters).Google Scholar

D’Ancona, C., 2005 ‘Les Sentences de Porphyre entre les Ennéades de Plotin et les Éléments de Théologie de Proclus’, in Brisson, L. (ed. and trans.), Porphyre: Sentences, vol. 1 (J. Vrin), 139–274.Google Scholar

D’Ancona Costa, C., 1992 ‘ΑΜΟΡΦΟΝ ΚΑΙ ΑΝΕΙΔΕΟΝ. Causalité des Formes et causalité de l’Un chez Plotin’, Revue de Philosophie Ancienne 10 (1): 69–113.Google Scholar

D’Ancona Costa, C., 1996 ‘Plotinus and Later Platonic Philosophers on the Causality of the First Principle’, in Gerson, L. P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus (Cambridge University Press), 356–85.Google Scholar

D’Ancona Costa, C., 1999 ‘Porphyry, Universal Soul and the Arabic Plotinus’, Arabic Sciences and Philosophv 9: 47–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D’Ancona Costa, C., 2002 ‘“To Bring Back the Divine in Us to the Divine in the All”: Vita Plotini 2.26–27 Once Again’, in Kobusch, T. and Erler, M. (eds.), Metaphysik und Religion: Zur Signatur des spätantiken Denkens (Saur), 517–65.Google Scholar

D’Hoine, P., 2016 ‘Platonic Forms and the Triad of Being, Life, and Intellect’, in d’Hoine, P. and Martijn, M. (eds.), All From One: A Guide to Proclus (Oxford University Press), 98–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D’Hoine, P. and Martijn, M. (eds.), 2016 All From One: A Guide to Proclus (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dancy, R. M., 1991 Two Studies in the Early Academy (State University of New York Press).Google Scholar

Dancy, R. M., 1999 ‘The Categories of Being in Plato’s Sophist 255c–e’, Ancient Philosophy 19 (1): 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DaVia, C., 2017 ‘Aristotle and the Endoxic Method’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 55 (3): 383–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deck, J. N., 1967 Nature, Contemplation, and the One: A Study in the Philosophy of Plotinus (University of Toronto Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Haas, F. A. J., 2001 ‘Did Plotinus and Porphyry Disagree on Aristotle’s Categories?’, Phronesis 46 (4): 492–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Haas, F. A. J., 2004 ‘Context and Strategy of Plotinus’ Treatise on the Genera of Being (Enn. VI 1–3 [42–44])’, in Celluprica, V. and D’Ancona, C. (eds.), Aristotle e i suoi esegeti neoplatonici: Logica e ontologia nelle interpretazioni greche e arabe, Atti del convegno internazionale (Roma, October 19–20, 2001) (Bibliopolis), 39–53.Google Scholar

De Haas, F. A. J. and Fleet, B. (eds. and trans.), 2001 Simplicius: On Aristotle Categories 5–6 (Bloomsbury).Google Scholar

De Koninck, T., 1994 ‘Aristotle on God as Thought Thinking Itself’, Review of Metaphysics 47 (3): 471–515.Google Scholar

De Lacy, P. (ed. and trans.), 1978–84 Galen: On the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato, 3 vols. (Akademie Verlag).Google Scholar

De Libera, A. and Segonds, A.-P. (ed. and trans.), 1998 Porphyre: Isagoge (J. Vrin).Google Scholar

Desjardins, R., 2004 Plato and the Good: Illuminating the Darkling Vision (Brill).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Des Places, É. (ed. and trans.), 1973 Numénius: Fragments (Les Belles Lettres).Google Scholar

Des Places, É. (ed. and trans.), 1977 Atticus: Fragments (Les Belles Lettres).Google Scholar

De Vogel, C. J., 1970 Philosophia I: Studies in Greek Philosophy (Van Gorcum).Google Scholar

De Vogel, C. J., 1986 Rethinking Plato and Platonism (Brill).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diels, H. and Kranz, W. (eds.), 1959–60 Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, 9th edn, 3 vols. (Weidmann).Google Scholar

Diès, A., 1972 Autour de Platon, 2nd edn (Belles Lettres).Google Scholar

Dillon, J. M. (ed. and trans.) 1973 Iamblichi Chalcidensis in Platonis dialogos commentariorum fragmenta (Brill).Google Scholar

Dillon, J. M., 1983 ‘Plotinus, Philo and Origen on the Grades of Virtue’, in Blume, H.-D. and Mann, F. (eds.), Platonismus und Christentum (Aschendorff), 92–105.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. M. (ed. and trans.), 1988 Alcinous: The Handbook of Platonism (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Dillon, J. M. (ed. and trans.), 1990 Dexippus: On Aristotle Categories (Bloomsbury).Google Scholar

Dillon, J. M., 1996a The Middle Platonists, 80 B.C. to A.D. 220, rev. edn (Cornell University Press).Google Scholar

Dillon, J. M., 1996b ‘An Ethic for the Late Ancient Sage’, in Gerson, L. P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus (Cambridge University Press), 315–35.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. M., 2003 The Heirs of Plato: A Study of the Old Academy (347–274 B.C.) (Clarendon Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dillon, J. M. (trans.), 2005 ‘Porphyry, Pathways to the Intelligible’, in Brisson, L. (ed.), Porphyre: Sentences, vol. 2 (J. Vrin), 795–836.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. M., 2009 ‘St John in Amelius’ Seminar’, in Vassilopoulou, P. and Clark, S. R. L. (eds.), Late Antique Epistemology: Other Ways to Truth (Palgrave Macmillan), 30–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dillon, J. M., 2010 ‘Iamblichus of Chalcis and His School’, in Gerson, L. P. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity (Cambridge University Press), 358–74.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. M., 2013 ‘Plotinus and the Vehicle of the Soul’, in Corrigan, K. and Rasimus, T. (eds.), Gnosticism, Platonism and the Late Ancient World: Essays in Honour of John D. Turner (Brill), 485–96.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. M. and Finamore, J. F. (eds. and trans.), 2002 Iamblichus: De Anima (Brill).Google Scholar

Dodds, E. R., 1928 ‘The Parmenides of Plato and the Origin of the Neoplatonic “One”’, Classical Quarterly 22 (3–4): 129–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dodds, E. R., 1960 ‘Numenius and Ammonius’, in Les Sources de Plotin. Entretiens sur l’Antiquité Classique, vol. 5 (Fondation Hardt), 1–32.Google Scholar

Dodds, E. R., Theiler, W., Hadot, P., Puech, H.-C., Dörrie, H., Cilento, V., Harder, R., Schmyzer, H. R., Armstrong, A. H. and Henry, P. 1960 ‘Discussion’, in Les Sources de Plotin. Entretiens sur l’Antiquité Classique, vol. 5 (Fondation Hardt), 379–90.Google Scholar

Donini, P. L., 1994 ‘Testi e commenti, manuali e insegnamento: La forma sistematica e i metodi della filosofia in età postellenistica’, in Haase, W. and Temporini, H. (eds.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, vol. 2, 36.7 (De Gruyter), 5027–5100.Google Scholar

Doresse, J., 1960 The Secret Books of the Egyptian Gnostics (Viking Press).Google Scholar

Dörrie, H., 1955 ‘Hypostasis: Wort- und Bedeutungsgeschichte’, Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Philosophisch-Historische Klasse 3: 35–92 [reprinted in Dörrie 1976].Google Scholar

Dörrie, H., 1976 Platonica Minora (Fink).Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. and Baltes, M., 1996 Die philosophische Lehre des Platonismus: Einige grundlegende Axiome / Platonische Physik (im antiken Verständnis) I. Bausteine 101–124: Text, Übersetzung, Kommentar (Frommann-Holzboog).Google Scholar

Dragona-Monachou, M., 1994 ‘Divine Providence in the Philosophy of the Early Empire’, in Haase, W. and Temporini, H. (eds.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, vol. 2, 36.7 (De Gruyter), 4417–90.Google Scholar

Drossart-Lulofs, H. J. (ed.), 1965 Aristotle: De generatione animalium (Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Drozdek, A., 2007 Greek Philosophers as Theologians: The Divine Arche (Routledge).Google Scholar

Duffy, J. M. (ed.), 1992 Michaelis Pselli: Philosophica Minora, vol. 1. (B. G. Teubner).Google Scholar

Edwards, M. J., 1989 ‘Aidōs in Plotinus: Enneads II.9.10’, Classical Quarterly 39 (1): 228–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, M. J., 1997 ‘Being, Life and Mind: A Brief Inquiry’, Syllecta Classica 8: 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, M. J., 2007 ‘Porphyry and the Christians’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies. Supplement No. 98: 111–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, M. J., 2010 ‘Numenius of Apamea’, in Gerson, L. P. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity (Cambridge University Press), 115–25.Google Scholar

Eliasson, E., 2009 ‘Sur la conception plotinienne du destin dans le traité 3’, Les Études philosophiques 90 (3): 407–30.Google Scholar

Elsas, C., 1975 Neuplatonische und gnostische Weltablehnung in der Schule Plotins (De Gruyter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emilsson, E. K., 1988 Plotinus on Sense-Perception: A Philosophical Study (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emilsson, E. K., 1990 ‘Reflections on Plotinus’ Ennead IV 2’, in Teodorsson, S.-T. (ed.), Greek and Latin Studies in Memory of Cajus Fabricius (Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis), 206–19.Google Scholar

Emilsson, E. K., 1994 ‘Platonic Soul-Body Dualism in the Early Centuries of the Empire to Plotinus’, in Haase, W. and Temporini, H. (eds.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, vol. 2, 36.2 (De Gruyter), 5331–62.Google Scholar

Emilsson, E. K., 1995 ‘Plotinus on the Objects of Thought’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 77 (1): 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emilsson, E. K., 1998 ‘Plotinus on the Emotions’, in Sihvola, J. and Engberg-Pedersen, T. (eds.), The Emotions in Hellenistic Philosophy (Springer), 339–63.Google Scholar

Emilsson, E. K., 2007 Plotinus on Intellect (Clarendon Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emilsson, E. K., 2012 ‘Plotinus and Plato on Soul and Action’, in Barney, R., Brennan, T., and Brittain, C. (eds.), Plato and the Divided Self (Cambridge University Press), 350–67.Google Scholar

Emilsson, E. K., 2017 Plotinus (Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emilsson, E. K., 2019 ‘Plotinus’ Doctrine of Badness as Matter in Ennead I.8 [51]’, in Pavlos, P. G., Janby, L. F., Emilsson, E. K., and Tollefsen, T. T. (eds.), Platonism and Christian Thought in Late Antiquity (Routledge), 78–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emilsson, E. K., 2021 ‘Porphyry’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. E. N. Zalta (Spring 2021 edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/porphyry/.Google Scholar

Evangeliou, C., 1988 Aristotle’s Categories and Porphyry (Brill).Google Scholar

Falcon, A., 2018 ‘The Early Reception of Aristotle’s Categories: Comments on Michael Griffin, Aristotle’s Categories in the Early Roman Empire’, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 29: 1–12.Google Scholar

Falcon, A., 2019 ‘Aristotle’s Method of Inquiry in Eudemian Ethics 1 and 2’, in Bonazzi, M., Forcignanò, F., and Ulacco, A. (eds.), Thinking, Knowing, Acting: Epistemology and Ethics in Plato and Ancient Platonism (Brill), 186–206.Google Scholar

Faust, A., 1987 (1931–2) Der Möglichkeitsgedanke: Systemgeschichtliche Untersuchungen, 2 vols., reprint (Garlan).Google Scholar

Ferrari, F., 1997 ‘Esistono forme di καθ‘ ἕκαστα? Il problema dell’individualità in Plotino e nella tradizione platonica’, Atti dell’Accademia delle Scienze di Torino (Classe di Scienze Morali) 131: 23–63.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. 1998 ‘La collocazione dell’anima e la questione dell’esistenza di idee di individui in Plotino’, Rivista di Storia della Filosofia 53: 629–53.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F., forthcoming ‘Individualität’.Google Scholar

Festugière, A.-J., 1944–54 La Révélation d’Hermès Trismégiste, 4 vols. (Lecoffre).Google Scholar

Festugière, A.-J., 1953 La Révélation d‘Hermès Trismégiste, vol. 3: Les doctrines de l’âme (Lecoffre).Google Scholar

Festugière, A.-J., 1954 La Révélation d‘Hermès Trismégiste, vol. 4: Le Dieu inconnu et la Gnose (Lecoffre).Google Scholar

Findlay, J. N., 1974 Plato: The Written and Unwritten Doctrines (Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar

Fleet, B. (ed. and trans.), 1995 Plotinus: Ennead III.6: On the Impassivity of the Bodiless (Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Fleet, B. (ed. and trans.), 2002 Simplicius: On Aristotle Categories 7–8 (Bloomsbury).Google Scholar

Frede, D., 2012 ‘The Endoxon Mystique: What Endoxa Are and What They Are Not’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 43: 185–215.Google Scholar

Frede, M., 1980 ‘The Original Notion of Cause’, in Barnes, J., Burnyeat, M., and Schofield, M. (eds.), Doubt and Dogmatism: Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology (Cambridge University Press), 217–49.Google Scholar

Frede, M., 1983 ‘Stoics and Sceptics on Clear and Distinct Impressions’, in Burnyeat, M. F. (ed.), The Skeptical Tradition (University of California Press).Google Scholar

Frede, M., 1990 ‘La teoría de las ideas in Longinus’, Méthexis 3: 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaiser, K., 1986 ‘Platons Zusammenschau der mathematischen Wissenschaften’, Antike und Abendland 32: 89–124 [English translation in Nikulin, D., 2012 The Other Plato: The Tübingen Interpretation of Plato’s Inner-Academic Teachings (State University of New York Press), 83–120].CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuentes González, P. P., 2005 ‘Nouménios d’Apamée’, in Goulet, R. (ed.), Dictionnaire des Philosophes Antiques, vol. 4 (Éditions du CNRS), 724–40.Google Scholar

Gabriel, M., 2009 Skeptizismus und Idealismus in der Antike (Suhrkamp).Google Scholar

Gaskin, R. (ed. and trans.), 2000 Simplicius: On Aristotle Categories 9–15 (Bloomsbury).Google Scholar

Gersh, S. (ed.), 2014 Interpreting Proclus: From Antiquity to the Renaissance (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerson, L. P., 1994 Plotinus (Routledge).Google Scholar

Gerson, L. P. (ed.), 1996 The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerson, L. P., 1997a ‘Introspection, Self-Reflexivity, and the Essence of Thinking According to Plotinus’, in Cleary, J. J. (ed.), The Perennial Tradition of Neoplatonism (Leuven University Press), 153–73.Google Scholar

Gerson, L. P., 1997b ‘Epistrophê pros heauton: History and Meaning’, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofia medievale 8: 1–32.Google Scholar

Gerson, L. P., 1998 Plotinus, 2nd edn (Routledge).Google Scholar

Gerson, L. P., 2005 Aristotle and Other Platonists (Cornell University Press).Google Scholar

Gerson, L. P., 2006 ‘The “Holy Solemnity” of Forms and the Platonic Interpretation of Sophist’, Ancient Philosophy 26 (2): 291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerson, L. P., 2009 Ancient Epistemology (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerson, L. P. (ed.), 2010 The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Gerson, L. P., 2012 ‘Plotinus on logos’, in Wilberding, J. and Horn, C. (eds.), Neoplatonism and the Philosophy of Nature (Oxford University Press), 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerson, L. P., 2013a From Plato to Platonism (Cornell University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerson, L. P. (ed. and trans.), 2013b Plotinus: Ennead V.5: That the Intelligibles are not External to the Intellect, and on the Good (Parmenides Publishing).Google Scholar

Gerson, L. P., 2014 ‘Neoplatonic Epistemology: Knowledge, Truth and Intellection’, in Remes, P. and Slaveva-Griffin, S. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism (Routledge), 266–79.Google Scholar

Gerson, L. P. (ed.), 2018 Plotinus: The Enneads, trans. G. Boys-Stones, Boys-Stones, J. M. Dillon, L. P. Gerson, R. A. H. King, A. Smith, and J. Wilberding (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Gerson, L. P., 2020 Platonism and Naturalism: The Possibility of Philosophy (Cornell University Press).Google Scholar

Gertler, B., 2011 Self-Knowledge, New Problems of Philosophy (Routledge).Google Scholar

Gertz, S., 2017 Plotinus: Ennead II.9: Against the Gnostics (Parmenides Publishing).Google Scholar

Gigon, Olof (ed.), 1987 Aristotelis Opera, vol. 3: Librorum Deperditorum Fragmenta (De Gruyter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldschmidt, T., 2016 ‘A Demonstration of the Causal Power of Absences’, Dialectica 70 (1): 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gourinat, J.-B., 2008 ‘L’embryon végétatif et la formation de l’âme selon les Stoïciens’, in Brisson, L., Congourdeau, M.-H., and Solère, J.-L. (eds.), L’embryon: Formation et animation (J. Vrin), 59–77.Google Scholar

Graeser, A. 1972 Plotinus and the Stoics: A Preliminary Study (Brill).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greig, J., 2017 ‘Proclus and Plotinus on Self-Constitution in the One’, SocArXiv, https://doi.org/doi:10.31235/osf.io/c3zfr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greig, J., 2020 ‘Proclus on the Two Causal Models for the One’s Production of Being: Reconciling the Relation of the Henads and the Limit/Unlimited’, International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 14 (1): 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffin, M. J., 2015 Aristotle’s Categories in the Early Roman Empire (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffin, M. J., 2020 ‘Articulating Preconceptions: A Reconsideration of Aristotle’s Categories in the Early Roman Empire’, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 31: 1–39.Google Scholar

Griswold, C. L., 2002 ‘Comments on Kahn’, in Annas, J. and Rowe, C. (eds.), New Perspectives on Plato, Modern and Ancient (Centre for Hellenic Studies), 129–44.Google Scholar

Gurtler, G. M., 1988 Plotinus: The Experience of Unity (Peter Lang).Google Scholar

Gurtler, G. M., 2002 ‘Providence: The Platonic Demiurge and Hellenistic Causality’, in Wagner, M. F. (ed.), Neoplatonism and Nature: Studies in Plotinus’ Enneads (State University of New York Press), 99–124.Google Scholar

Guthrie, W. K. C., 1978 A History of Greek Philosophy, vol. 5: The Later Plato and the Academy (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Guyot, M., 2009 ‘Traité 45: L’éternité et le temps’, in Brisson, L. and Pradeau, J.-F. (eds.), Plotin: Traités 45–50 (GF Flammarion), 13–126.Google Scholar

Hadot, P., 1960 ‘Être, vie, pensée chez Plotin et avant Plotin’, in Les Sources de Plotin. Entretiens sur l’Antiquité Classique, vol. 5 (Fondation Hardt), 107–57.Google Scholar

Hadot, P., 1962 ‘Un, Unité’, in Ritter, J. (ed.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, vol. 2 (Schwab), col. 361–7.Google Scholar

Hadot, I. (ed.), 1987 Simplicius: sa vie, son œuvre, sa survie. Actes du Colloque International de Paris (28 Sept.–1er Oct. 1985), Peripatoi: Philologisch-Historische Studien zum Aristotelismus 15 (De Gruyter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hadot, I., 1991 ‘The Role of the Commentators on Aristotle in the Teaching of Philosophy According to the Prefaces the Neoplatonic Commentaries on the Categories’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy suppl. vol.: 175–89.Google Scholar

Hadot, P., 1968 Porphyre et Victorinus, 2 vols. (Institut d’Études augustiniennes).Google Scholar

Hadot, P. (ed. and trans.), 1988 Plotin: Traité 38 (VI,7) (Éditions du Cerf).Google Scholar

Hadot, P., 1990 ‘La logique, partie ou instrument de la philosophie?’, in Hadot, I. (ed.), Simplicius: Commentaire sur les Catégories, vol. 1: Introduction (Brill), 183–8.Google Scholar

Hadot, P. (ed. and trans.), 1994 Plotin: Traité 9 (VI,9) (Éditions du Cerf).Google Scholar

Hadot, P., 1995 Philosophy as a Way of Life: Spiritual Exercises from Socrates to Foucault, trans. Michael Chase (Blackwell).Google Scholar

Hadot, P., 1996 ‘La conception plotinienne de l’identité entre l’intellect et son objet’, in Romeyer-Dherbey, G. (ed.), Corps et âme. Sur le De anima d’Aristote (J. Vrin), 367–76.Google Scholar

Halfwassen, J., 2000 ‘Der Demiurg: Seine Stellung in der Philosophie Platons und seine Deutung im antiken Platonismus’, in Neschke-Hentschke, A. (ed.), Le Timée de Platon. Contributions à l’histoire de sa réception/Platos Timaios. Beiträge zu seiner Rezeptionsgeschichte (Éditions Peeters), 39–62.Google Scholar

Halfwassen, J., 2014 ‘The Metaphysics of the One’, in Remes, P. and Slaveva-Griffin, S. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism (Routledge), 182–99.Google Scholar

Ham, B. (ed. and trans.), 2000 Plotin: Traité 49 (V,3) (Éditions du Cerf).Google Scholar

Harder, R., 1936 ‘Eine neue Schrift Plotins’, Hermes 71 (1): 1–10.Google Scholar

Harder, R., Beutler, R., and Theiler, W. (eds. and trans.) 1956–71 Plotins Schriften, 6 vols. (Meiner).Google Scholar

Harnack, A. (trans.), 1916 Porphyrius: Gegen die Christen (Reimer).Google Scholar

Heiser, J. H., 1991 Logos and Language in the Philosophy of Plotinus (Edwin Mellen).Google Scholar

Helmig, C., 2012 Forms and Concepts: Concept Formation in the Platonic Tradition (De Gruyter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henry, P., 1960 ‘Une comparaison chez Aristote, Alexandre et Plotin’, in Les Sources de Plotin. Entretiens sur l’Antiquité Classique, vol. 5 (Fondation Hardt), 427–44.Google Scholar

Henry, P. and Schwyzer, H.-R., 1964, 1976, 1982 Plotini Opera, 3 vols. (editio minor) (Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Hestir, B. E., 2016 Plato on the Metaphysical Foundation of Meaning and Truth (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hiller, E. (ed.), 1995 Theon Smyrnaeus: Theonis Smyrnaei Philosophi Platonici Expositio rerum mathematicarum ad legendum Platonem utilium (B. G. Teubner).Google Scholar

Hoffmann, P., 1987, ‘Catégories et langage selon Simplicius – la question du skopos du traité aristotélicien des Catégories’, in Hadot, I. (ed.), Simplicius: sa vie, son œuvre, sa survie. Actes du Colloque International de Paris (28 Sept.–1er Oct. 1985), Peripatoi: Philologisch-Historische Studien zum Aristotelismus 15 (De Gruyter), 61–90.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, P., 1997 ‘L’expression de l’indicible dans le néoplatonisme grec de Plotin à Damascius’, in Lévy, C. and Pernot, L. (eds.), Dire l’évidence (Philosophie et rhétorique antiques) (L’Harmattan), 335–90.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, P., 1998 ‘La fonction des prologues exégètiques dans la pensée pédagogique néoplatonicienne’, Dubois, J.-D. and Roussel, B. (eds.), Entrer en matière: Les prologues (Éditions du Cerf), 209–45.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, P., 2005 ‘La définition stoïcienne du temps dans le miroir du néoplatonisme (Plotin, Jamblique)’, in Gourinat, J.-B. (ed.), Les Stoïciens (J. Vrin), 487–521.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, P., 2006 ‘What Was Commentary in Late Antiquity? The Example of the Neoplatonic Commentators’, in Gill, M. L. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), A Companion to Ancient Philosophy (Blackwell), 597–622.Google Scholar

Horn, C., 1995 Plotin über Sein, Zahl und Einheit (B. G. Teubner).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horn, C., 2002 ‘L’auto-déclaration de l’Un dans l’Ennéade V, 3 [49] et son arrière-plan dans la théorie plotinienne de la prédication’, in Dixsaut, M. (ed.), La connaissance de soi: Études sur le traité 49 de Plotin (J. Vrin), 41–71.Google Scholar

Howland, J., 1991 ‘Re-Reading Plato: The Problem of Platonic Chronology’, Phoenix 45 (3): 189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huffman, C. A. (ed.), 2014 A History of Pythagoreanism (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hulin, M., 1993 La mystique sauvage (Presses universitaires de France).Google Scholar

Hutchinson, D. M., 2018 Plotinus on Consciousness (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Igal, J., 1981 ‘The Gnostics and “The Ancient Philosophy” in Plotinus’, in Blumenthal, H. J. and Markus, R. A. (eds.), Neoplatonism and Early Christian Thought: Essays in Honour of A. H. Armstrong (Variorum), 138–49.Google Scholar

Igal, J. (ed. and trans.), 1985 Plotino: Enéadas III–IV (Editorial Gredos).Google Scholar

Jackson, F., 1982 ‘Epiphenomenal Qualia’, The Philosophical Quarterly 32 (127): 127–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, H. M., 1990 ‘The Seer Nikotheos and His Lost Apocalypse in the Light of Sethian Apocalypses from Nag Hammadi and the Apocalypse of Elchasai’, Novum Testamentum 32 (3): 250–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johansen, T. K., 1998 Aristotle on the Sense-Organs (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Johansen, T. K., 2004 Plato’s Natural Philosophy: A Study of the Timaeus-Critias (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, R. M., 1926 ‘The Ideas as Thoughts of God’, Classical Philology 21: 317–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahn, C. H., 1976 ‘Why Existence Does Not Emerge as a Distinct Concept in Greek Philosophy’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 58 (4): 323–34.Google Scholar

Kahn, C. H., 1985 ‘On the Intended Interpretation of Aristotle’s Metaphysics’, in Wiesner, J. (ed.), Aristoteles Werke und Wirkung, vol. 1: Aristoteles und seine Schule (De Gruyter), 311–38.Google Scholar

Kalligas, P., 1997 ‘Forms of Individuals in Plotinus: A Re-Examination’, Phronesis 42 (2): 206–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kalligas, P., 2011 ‘The Structure of Appearances: Plotinus on the Constitution of Sensible Objects’, Philosophical Quarterly 61 (245): 762–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kalligas, P., 2013 ΠΛΩΤΙΝΟΥ: ΕΝΝΕΑΣ ΠEMΠΤΗ (Athenian Academy).Google Scholar

Kalligas, P., 2014 The Enneads of Plotinus: A Commentary, vol. 1, trans. E. K. Fowden and N. Pilavachi (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Kalligas, P., 2018a ‘Plotinus against Aristotle on the Problem of Evil’, in Kontos, P. (ed.), Evil in Aristotle (Cambridge University Press), 191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kalligas, P., 2018b Πλωτίνου, Εννεάς Έκτη (σε δύο ημίτομους) (Academy of Athens).Google Scholar

Kaplan, R., 1999 The Nothing That Is: A Natural History of Zero (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Karamanolis, G. E., 2006 Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle from Antiochus to Porphyry (Clarendon Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karamanolis, G. E., 2009 ‘Plotinus on Quality and Immanent Form’, in Chiaradonna, R. and Trabattoni, F. (eds.), Physics and Philosophy of Nature in Greek Neoplatonism (Brill), 79–100.Google Scholar

Karamanolis, G. E. and Sheppard, A. (eds.), 2007 Studies in Porphyry (Institute of Classical Studies).Google Scholar

Karbowski, J., 2015 ‘Phainomena as Witnesses and Examples: The Methodology of Eudemian Ethics 1.6’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 49: 193–226.Google Scholar

Karbowski, J., 2019 Aristotle’s Method in Ethics: Philosophy in Practice (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karfík, F., 2012 ‘Le temps et l’âme chez Plotin: À propos des Ennéades VI 5 [23] 11; IV 4 [28] 15–16; III 7 [45] 11’, Elenchos 33 (2): 227–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karfík, F., 2014 ‘Parts of Soul in Plotinus’, in Corcilius, K. and Perler, D. (eds.), Partitioning the Soul: Debates from Plato to Leibniz (De Gruyter), 107–48.Google Scholar

Karfíková, L., 2011 ‘Eternity According to Plotinus, Enn. III,7’, Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 58 (2): 437–52.Google Scholar

King, K. L., 2005 What is Gnosticism? (Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

King, R. A. H., 2009 Aristotle and Plotinus on Memory (De Gruyter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirchner, C. H., 1854 Die Philosophie des Plotin (H. W. Schmidt).Google Scholar

Krämer, H. J., 1964 Der Ursprung der Geistmetaphysik: Untersuchungen zur Geschichte des Platonismus zwischen Platon und Plotin (Schippers).Google Scholar

Krämer, H. J., 1990 Plato and the Foundations of Metaphysics, ed. and trans. Catan, J. R (State University of New York Press).Google Scholar

Kutash, E. and Finamore, J. F., 2016 ‘Proclus on the Psychê’, in d’Hoine, P. and Martijn, M. (eds.), All From One: A Guide to Proclus (Oxford University Press), 122–38.Google Scholar

Kühn, K. G. (ed.), 1821–33 Claudii Galeni Opera Omnia, 22 vols. (C. Cnoblochii).Google Scholar

Kühn, W., 2009 Quel savoir après le scepticism? Plotin et ses prédécesseurs sur la connaissance de soi (J. Vrin).Google Scholar

Lakmann, M.-L., 2017 Platonici minores, 1. Jh.v.Chr. – 2. Jh.n.Chr.: Prosopographie, Philosophia Antiqua 145 (Brill).Google Scholar

Lampe, G. W. H., 1961 A Patristic Greek Lexicon (Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Lavaud, L., 2006 ‘La diánoia médiatrice entre le sensible et l’intelligible’, Études platoniciennes 3: 29–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lavaud, L. (trans.), 2007 ‘Traité 39 (VI, 8): Sur le volontaire et sur la volonté de l’Un’, in Brisson, L. et Pradeau, J.-F. (eds.), Plotin: Traités 38–41 (GF Flammarion).Google Scholar

Lavaud, L., 2008 D’une métaphysique à l’autre. Figures de l’altérité dans la philosophie de Plotin (J. Vrin).Google Scholar

Layne, D. A. and Butorac, D. D., 2017 Proclus and His Legacy (De Gruyter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lernould, A. and Michalewski, A., forthcoming ‘Connaître par les notions communes. Quelques usages du concept d’ennoia de Plotin à Proclus’ in A. Kobec & F. Forcignano (eds), The Return of Innatism, Epistemology in Post-Hellenistic and Late Antique Philosophy, Leiden, Brill.Google Scholar

Lindberg, S., 2007 ‘The Living Consciousness of the German Idealists’, in Heinämaa, S, Lähteenmäki, V., and Remes, P. (eds.), Consciousness: From Perception to Reflection in the History of Philosophy (Springer), 245–64.Google Scholar

Linguiti, A., 2007 ‘La materia dei corpi: sullo pseudoilomorfìsmo plotiniano’, Quaestio 7: 105–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Linguiti, A., 2009 ‘Physis as Heimarmene: On Some Fundamental Principles of the Neoplatonic Philosophy of Nature’, in Chiaradonna, R. and Trabattoni, F. (eds.), Physics and Philosophy of Nature in Greek Neoplatonism (Brill), 173–88.Google Scholar

Lloyd, A. C., 1962 ‘Genus, Species and Ordered Series in Aristotle’, Phronesis 7 (1): 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lloyd, A. C., 1987 ‘Plotinus on the Genesis of Thought and Existence’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 5: 156–86.Google Scholar

Lloyd, A. C., 1990 The Anatomy of Neoplatonism (Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Long, A. A., 1996 ‘Parmenides on Thinking Being’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 12 (1): 125–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, A. A., 2001 ‘Ancient Philosophy’s Hardest Question: What to Make of Oneself?’, Representations 74: 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, A. A., 2016 ‘What is the Matter with Matter, According to Plotinus?’, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 78: 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, A. A. and Sedley, D., 1987 The Hellenistic Philosophers, vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Losev, A. F., 1928 Dialectica Chisla y Plotina: Perevod i kommentarii traktata Plotina ‘O Chislach’ (Izdanie Avtora).Google Scholar

Lovejoy, A. O., 1964 (1936) The Great Chain of Being (Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Macran, H. S. (ed.), 1902 Aristoxenus: Harmonika stoicheia (Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Maggi, C., 2009 Plotino: Sui Numeri, Enneade VI 6 [34]: Introduzione, testo, traduzione e commento, PhD dissertation, Università degli Studi Suor Orsola Benincasa.Google Scholar

Maggi, C., 2010 Sinfonia Matematica: Aporie e Soluzioni in Platone, Aristotele, Plotino, Giamblico (Loffredo Editore).Google Scholar

Maggi, C., 2012 ‘Iamblichus on Mathematical Entities’, in Afonasin, E. V., Dillon, J. M., and Finamore, J. F. (eds.), Iamblichus and the Foundations of Late Platonism (Brill), 75–89.Google Scholar

Magrin, S., 2010 ‘Sensation and Scepticism in Plotinus’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 39: 249–97.Google Scholar

Magrin, S., 2016 ‘Plotinus’ Reception of Aristotle’, in Falcon, A. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aristotle in Antiquity (Brill), 258–76.Google Scholar

Majumdar, D., 2007 Plotinus on the Appearance of Time and the World of Sense: A Pantomime (Ashgate).Google Scholar

Manchester, P., 1978 ‘Time and the Soul in Plotinus, III 7 [45], 11’, Dionysius 2: 101–36.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. and Runia, D. T., 2020 Aëtiana V: An Edition of the Reconstructed Text of the Placita with a Commentary and a Collection of Related Texts, 4 vols. (Brill).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martijn, M., 2010 Proclus on Nature: Philosophy of Nature and Its Methods in Proclus’ Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus (Brill).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martijn, M., 2014 ‘Proclus’ Geometrical Method’, in Remes, P. and Slaveva-Griffin, S. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism (Routledge), 145–59.Google Scholar

Martijn, M. and Gerson, L. P., 2016 ‘Proclus’ System’, in d’Hoine, P. and Martijn, M. (eds.), All From One: A Guide to Proclus (Oxford University Press), 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGroarty, K., 2006 Plotinus on Eudaimonia: A Commentary on Ennead I.4 (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

McGuire, J. E. and Strange, S. K., 1988 ‘An Annotated Translation of Plotinus Ennead III 7: On Eternity and Time’, Ancient Philosophy 8 (2): 251–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meijer, P. A., 1992 Plotinus on the Good or the One (Enneads VI, 9): An Analytical Commentary (J. C. Gieben).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Menn, S., 1995 ‘Metaphysics, Dialectic, and the Categories’, Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 100 (3): 311–37.Google Scholar

Menn, S., 1999 ‘The Stoic Theory of Categories’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 17: 215–47.Google Scholar

Menn, S., 2001a ‘Longinus on Plotinus’, Dionysius 19: 113–23.Google Scholar

Menn, S., 2001b ‘Plotinus on the Identity of Knowledge with Its Object’, Apeiron 34 (3): 233–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Menn, S., 2018 ‘Andronicus and Boethus: Reflections on Michael Griffin’s Aristotle’s Categories in the Early Roman Empire’, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 29: 13–44.Google Scholar

Merlan, P., 1967 ‘The Pythagoreans’, in Armstrong, A. H. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge University Press), 84–106.Google Scholar

Merlan, P., 1969 Monopsychism, Mysticism, Metaconsciousness: Problems of the Soul in the Neo-Aristotelian and Neoplatonic Tradition (Martijn Niehof).Google Scholar

Mesyats, S., 2012 ‘Iamblichus’ Exegesis of Parmenides’ Hypotheses and His Doctrine of Divine Henads’, in Afonasin, E., Dillon, J. M., and Finamore, J. F. (eds.), Iamblichus and the Foundations of Late Platonism (Brill), 151–75.Google Scholar

Michalewski, A., 2012 ‘Le Premier de Numénius et l’Un de Plotin’, Archives de Philosophie 75: 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Michalewski, A., 2014 La puissance de l’intelligible. La théorie plotinienne des Forms au miroir de l’héritage médioplatonicien (Leuven University Press).Google Scholar

Michalewski, A., 2021 ‘Plotinus on the Conception of Time (ennoia chronou): A Re-Examination of Enn. 3.7(45).12’, Méthexis 33: 151–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Migne, J.-P. (ed.), 1857–66 Patrologiae cursus completus: Series graeca, 161 vols. (Petit Montrouge).Google Scholar

Moraux, P., 1984 Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen, von Andronikos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias, vol 2: Der Aristotelismus im I. und II. Jh. n. Chr. (De Gruyter).Google Scholar

Morel, P. M., 2016 ‘Plotinus, Epicurus, and the Problem of Perceptual Evidence’, in Longo, A. and Taormina, D. P. (eds.), Plotinus and Epicurus: Matter, Perception, Pleasure (Cambridge University Press), 96–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morel, P. M., 2018 ‘L’argomento della “venerabilità dell’essere” e la sua fortuna (Aristotele e Plotino, eredi di Platone, Sofista, 248e–249a)’, Antiquorum Philosophia 12: 11–26.Google Scholar

Morrow, G. R. and Dillon, J. M. (trans.), 1987 Proclus’ Commentary on Plato’s Parmenides (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Mortley, R., 1986 From Word to Silence, 2 vols. (Hanstein).Google Scholar

Müller, I. (ed.), 1891 ‘The Capacities of the Soul Depend on the Mixture of the Body (Quod animi mores corporis temperamenta sequantur)’, in Marquardt, I., Müller, I., and Helmreich, G. (eds.), Claudii Galeni Pergameni: Scripta minora, vol. 2 (B. G. Teubner).Google Scholar

Müller, H. F., 1916 ‘Physis bei Plotinos’, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 71: 232–45.Google Scholar

Nagel, T., 1986 The View from Nowhere (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Narbonne, J.-M., 1987 ‘Plotin et le problème de la génération de la matière; à propos d’un article récent’, Dionysius 11: 3–31.Google Scholar

Narbonne, J.-M., 1994 La Métaphysique de Plotin (J. Vrin).Google Scholar

Narbonne, J.-M., 2007 ‘La controverse à propos de la génération de la matière chez Plotin: l’énigme résolue?’, Quaestio 7 (1): 123–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Narbonne, J.-M., 2011 Plotinus in Dialogue with the Gnostics (Brill).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nawar, T., 2017 ‘The Stoics on Identity, Identification, and Peculiar Qualities’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 32 (1): 113–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nickel, D. (ed. and trans.), 2001 Galen: Über die Ausformung der Keimlinge (De foetuum formatione) (Akademie Verlag).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nikulin, D., 2002 Matter, Imagination and Geometry: Ontology, Natural Philosophy and Mathematics in Plotinus, Proclus, and Descartes (Ashgate).Google Scholar

Nikulin, D., 2012 The Other Plato: The Tübingen Interpretation of Plato’s Inner-Academic Teachings (State University of New York Press).Google Scholar

Nikulin, D., 2019 Neoplatonism in Late Antiquity (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noble, C. I., 2013a ‘How Plotinus’ Soul Animates His Body: The Argument for the Soul-Trace at Enneads 4.4.18.1–9’, Phronesis 58 (3): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noble, C. I., 2013b ‘Plotinus’ Unaffectable Matter’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 44: 233–77.Google Scholar

Noble, C. I., 2016 ‘Plotinus’ Unaffectable Soul’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 51: 231–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noble, C. I., 2018 ‘Leaving Nothing to Chance: An Argument for Principle Monism in Plotinus’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 55: 185–226.Google Scholar

Noble, C. I. and Powers, N. M., 2015 ‘Creation and Divine Providence in Plotinus’, in Marmodoro, A. and Prince, B. D. (eds.), Causation and Creation in Late Antiquity (Cambridge University Press), 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nock, A. D., 1964 ‘Gnosticism’, The Harvard Theological Review 57(4): 255–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Brien, D., 1971 ‘Plotinus on Evil: A Study of Matter and the Soul in Plotinus’ Conception of Human Evil’, in Le néoplatonisme. Royaumont 9–13 juin 1969 (Éditions du CNRS), 113–46.Google Scholar

O’Brien, D., 1985 ‘Temps et éternité dans la philosophie grecque’, in Tiffenau, D. (ed.), Mythes et représentations du temps (Editions du CNRS), 59–85.Google Scholar

O’Brien, D., 1990 ‘The Origin of Matter and the Origin of Evil in Plotinus’ Criticism of the Gnostics’, in Brague, R. and Courtine, J.-F. (eds.), Herméneutique et ontologie. Mélanges en hommage à Pierre Aubenque, ΦΡΟΝΙΜΟΣ ΑΝΗΡ (Presses universitaires de France), 181–202.Google Scholar

O’Brien, D., 1991 Plotinus on the Origin of Matter: An Exercise in the Interpretation of the Enneads (Bibliopolis).Google Scholar

O’Brien, D., 1993 Théodicée plotinienne, théodicée gnostique (Brill).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Brien, D., 1996 ‘Plotinus on Matter and Evil’, in Gerson, L. P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus (Cambridge University Press), 171–95.Google Scholar

O’Brien, D., 1999 ‘La matière chez Plotin: son origine, sa nature’, Phronesis 44 (1): 45–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Brien, D., 2011a ‘Plotinus on the Making of Matter Part I: The Identity of Darkness’, International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 5 (1): 6–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Brien, D., 2011b ‘Plotinus on the Making of Matter Part II: “A Corpse Adorned” (Enn. II 4 [12] 5.18)’, International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 5 (2): 209–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Brien, D., 2012 ‘Plotinus on the Making of Matter Part III: The Essential Background’, International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 6 (1): 27–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Brien, D., 2014 ‘Plotinus on Matter, Non-Being and Evil’, in Jourdan, F. and Hirsch-Luipold, R. (eds.), Die Wurzel allen Übels: Vorstellungen über die Herkunft des Bösen und Schlechten in der Philosophie und Religion des 1.–4. Jahrhunderts (Mohr Siebeck), 211–38.Google Scholar

O’Brien, D., 2017 ‘Plotinus on Evil: Proclus and the Author of the Divine Names’, in Finamore, J. F. and Wear, S. K. (eds.), Defining Platonism: Essays in Honor of the 75th Birthday of John M. Dillon (Steubenville) 130–61.Google Scholar

O’Daly, G. (ed. and trans.), 2017 Plotinus: Ennead I.1: What is the Living Thing? What is Man? (Parmenides Publishing).Google Scholar

O’Meara, D. J., 1974 ‘À Propos d’un Témoignage sur l’ Éxperience Mystique de Plotin (Enn. IV 8 [6], I, I–II)’, Mnemosyne 27 (3): 238–44.Google Scholar

O’Meara, D. J., 1975 Structures hiérarchiques dans la pensée de Plotin (Brill).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Meara, D. J., 1980 ‘Gnosticism and the Making of the World in Plotinus’, in Layton, B. (ed.), The Rediscovery of Gnosticism: Proceedings of the International Conference on Gnosticism at Yale, New Haven, Connecticut, March 28–31, 1978, vol. 1 (Brill), 364–78.Google Scholar

O’Meara, D. J., 1989 Pythagoras Revived: Mathematics and Philosophy in Late Antiquity (Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

O’Meara, D. J., 1990 ‘Le problème du discours de l’indicible chez Plotin’, Revue de théologie et de philosophie 122 (2): 145–56.Google Scholar

O’Meara, D. J., 1992 Plotin: Une introduction aux Ennéades, trans. A. Banateanu (Academic Press Fribourg Suisse).Google Scholar

O’Meara, D. J., 1993 Plotinus: An Introduction to the Enneads (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

O’Meara, D. J., 1996 ‘The Hierarchical Ordering of Reality in Plotinus’, in Gerson, L. P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus (Cambridge University Press), 66–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Meara, D. J., 1997 ‘Das Böse bei Plotin (Enn. I,8)’, in Kobusch, T. and Mojsisch, B. (eds.), Platon in der abendländischen Geistesgeschichte: Neue Forschungen zum Platonismus (WBG), 33–47.Google Scholar

O’Meara, D. J., 1999a ‘Forms of Individuals in Plotinus: A Preface to the Question’, in Cleary, J. (ed.), Traditions of Platonism: Essays in Honour of John Dillon (Ashgate), 263–9.Google Scholar

O’Meara, D. J. (ed. and trans.), 1999b Plotin: Traité 51 (I,8) (Éditions du Cerf).Google Scholar

O’Meara, D. J., 2000 ‘Scepticism and Ineffability in Plotinus’, Phronesis 45 (3): 240–51.Google Scholar

O’Meara, D. J., 2002 ‘Scepticisme et ineffabilité chez Plotin’, Dixsaut, M. (ed.), La connaissance de soi: Études sur le traité 49 de Plotin (J. Vrin), 91–103.Google Scholar

O’Meara, D. J., 2003 Platonopolis: Platonic Political Philosophy in Late Antiquity (Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

O’Meara, D. J., 2005 ‘The Metaphysics of Evil in Plotinus: Problems and Solutions’, in Dillon, J. M. and Dixsault, M. (eds.), Agonistes: Essays in Honour of Denis O’Brien (Ashgate), 179–85.Google Scholar

O’Meara, D. J., 2012 ‘Aristotelian Ethics in Plotinus’, in Miller, J. (ed.), The Reception of Aristotle’s Ethics (Cambridge University Press), 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Meara, D. J., 2014 ‘Iamblichus’ On the Pythagorean Life in Context’, in Huffmann, C. A. (ed.), A History of Pythagoreanism (Cambridge University Press), 399–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Meara, D. J. (ed. and trans.), 2019a Plotin: Traité 19: Sur les vertus (J. Vrin).Google Scholar

O’Meara, D. J., 2019b ‘Explaining Evil in Late Antiquity: Plotinus and His Critics’, in Chignell, A. (ed.), Evil: A History (Oxford University Press), 129–54.Google Scholar

Omtzigt, J., 2012 Die Beziehung zwischen dem Schönen und dem Guten in der Philosophie Plotins (Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).Google Scholar

Opsomer, J., 2001 ‘Proclus vs Plotinus on Matter (De mal. subs. 30–7)’, Phronesis 46 (2): 154–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Opsomer, J., 2005a. ‘Demiurges in Early Imperial Platonism’, in Hirsch-Luipold, R. (ed.), Gott und die Götter bei Plutarch (De Gruyter), 51–99.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J., 2005b ‘A Craftsman and His Handmaiden: Demiurgy According to Plotinus’, in Leinkauf, T. and Steel, C. (eds.), Plato’s Timaeus and the Foundations of Cosmology in Late Antiquity, the Middle Ages and Renaissance (Leuven University Press), 67–102.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J., 2007 ‘Some Problems with Plotinus’ Theory of Matter/Evil: An Ancient Debate Continued’, Quaestio 7 (1): 165–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Opsomer, J., 2014 ‘The Middle Platonic Doctrine of Conditional Fate’, in d’Hoine, P. and van Riel, G. (eds.), Fate, Providence and Moral Responsibility in Ancient, Medieval and Early Modern Thought: Studies in Honour of Carlos Steel (Leuven University Press), 137–67.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J., 2016 ‘The Natural World’, in P. d’Hoine and M. Martijn (eds.), All From One: A Guide to Proclus (Oxford University Press), 139–66.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. and Steel, C. (eds. and trans.), 2003 Proclus: On the Existence of Evils (Bloomsbury).Google Scholar

Pasnau, R., 2013 ‘Epistemology Idealized’, Mind 122 (488): 987–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearson, B. A., 1990 Gnosticism, Judaism, and Egyptian Christianity (Fortress Press).Google Scholar

Pearson, B. A., 2013 ‘The Book of Allogenes (CT,4) and Sethian Gnosticism’, in Corrigan, K. and Rasimus, T. (eds.), Gnosticism, Platonism and the Late Ancient World (Brill), 105–16.Google Scholar

Pépin, J., 1956 ‘Éléments pour une histoire de la relation entre l’intelligence et l’intelligible chez Platon et dans le néoplatonisme’, Revue philosophique de la France et de l’Étranger 146: 39–64.Google Scholar

Perl, E. D., 1998 ‘The Demiurge and the Forms: A Return to the Ancient Interpretation of Plato’s Timaeus’, Ancient Philosophy 18 (1): 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perl, E. D., 2014 ‘The Motion of Intellect: On the Neoplatonic Reading of Sophist 248e–249d’, International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 8: 135–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perl, E. D., 2015 Plotinus: Ennead V.1. On the Three Primary Levels of Reality, Translation, Introduction, Commentary (Parmenides Press).Google Scholar

Phillips, J. F., 1987 ‘Stoic “Common Notions” in Plotinus’, Dionysius 11: 33–52.Google Scholar

Phillips, J. F., 2009 ‘Plotinus on the Generation of Matter’, International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 3 (2): 103–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pistelli, Ermenegildo (ed.), 1894 Iamblichi: In Nicomachi arithmeticam introductionem liber (B. G. Teubner).Google Scholar

Poirier, P.-H., 2012 ‘À propos de la νεῦσις dans les textes de Nag Hammadi’, Laval théologique et philosophique 68 (3): 619–26.Google Scholar

Poirier, P.-H. and Schmidt, T. S., 2010 ‘Chrétiens, hérétiques et gnostiques chez Porphyre. Quelques précisions sur la Vie de Plotin 16,1–9’ Comptes rendus des séances de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres 154 (2): 913–42.Google Scholar

Praechter, K., 1922 ‘Nikostratos der Platoniker’, Hermes 57 (4): 481–517.Google Scholar

Puech, H.-C., 1960 ‘Plotin et les Gnostiques’, in Les Sources de Plotin. Entretiens sur l’Antiquité Classique, vol. 5 (Fondation Hardt), 161–90.Google Scholar

Rappe, S., 2002 ‘Explanation and Nature in Enneads VI.7.1–15’, in Wagner, M. F. (ed.), Neoplatonism and Nature: Studies in Plotinus’ Enneads (State University of New York Press), 71–98.Google Scholar

Rashed, M., 2004 ‘Priorité de l’eidos ou du genos entre Andronicos et Alexandre: vestiges arabes et grecs inedits’, Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 14: 9–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rashed, M., 2007 Essentialisme: Alexandre d’Aphrodise entre logique, physique et cosmologie (De Gruyter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rashed, M., 2018 ‘Chose, item et distinction: L’“homme volant” d’Avicenne avec et contre Abū Hāšim al-Ǧubbā’ī’, Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 28: 167–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reale, G., 1997 Toward a New Interpretation of Plato, trans. Catan, J. R. and Davies, R. (The Catholic University of America Press).Google Scholar

Remes, P., 2007 Plotinus on the Self: The Philosophy of the ‘We’ (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Remes, P., 2014 ‘Self-Consciousness: Ancient Theories’, in Knuuttila, S. and Sihvola, J. (eds.), Sourcebook for the History of the Philosophy of Mind: Philosophical Psychology from Plato to Kant (Springer), 415–28.Google Scholar

Remes, P., 2016 ‘Plotinus on Starting Points of Reasoning’, Chôra 14: 29–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Renz, U., 2017a ‘Self-Knowledge as a Personal Achievement’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 117 (3): 253–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Renz, U., 2017b ‘Introduction’, in Renz, U. (ed.), Self-Knowledge (Oxford University Press), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rich, A. N. M., 1954 ‘The Platonic Ideas as the Thoughts of God’, Mnemosyne 7 (1): 123–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rist, J., 1967 Plotinus: The Road to Reality (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Rist, J., 1974 ‘Plotinus and Augustine on Evil’, in Plotino e il Neoplatonismo in Oriente e in Occidente, Atti del Convegno internazionale dell’ Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei (Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei), 495–508.Google Scholar

Rome, A. (ed.), 1936 Commentaires de Pappus et de Théon d’Alexandrie sur l’Almageste, vol. 2: Commentaire sur les livres 1 et 2 (Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana).Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. (ed.), 1924 Aristotle: Metaphysica (Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. (ed.), 1955 Aristotle: Fragmenta selecta (Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. (ed.), 1956 Aristotle: De anima (Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. (ed.), 1956 Aristotle: Physica (Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Roux, S., 2004 La recherche du principe chez Platon, Aristote et Plotin (J. Vrin).Google Scholar

Rödl, S., 2018 Self-Consciousness and Objectivity: An Introduction to Absolute Idealism (Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russi, C., 2005 ‘Provvidenza, lógos connettivo e lógos produttivo: Le tre funzioni dell’anima in Enn. III 3 [48] 4.6–13’, in Chiaradonna, R. (ed.), Studi sull’anima in Plotino (Bibliopolis), 59–78.Google Scholar

Rutten, C., 1956 ‘La doctrine des deux actes dans la philosophie de Plotin’, Revue Philosophique 146: 100–6.Google Scholar

Saffrey, H. D., 1992 ‘Pourquoi Porphyre a-t-il édité Plotin? Réponse provisoire’, in Brisson, L., Cherlonneix, J.-L., Goulet-Cazé, M.-O., Goulet, R., Grmek, M. D., Flamand, J.-M., Matton, S., Pépin, J., Saffrey, H. D., Segonds, A.-P., Tardieu, M., and Thillet, P. (eds. and trans.), Porphyre: La Vie de Plotin II, Histoire des doctrines de l’antiquité classique 16 (J. Vrin), 31–64.Google Scholar

Saffrey, H. D., 2000 Le néoplatonisme après Plotin, Histoire des doctrines de l’antiquité classique 24 (J. Vrin).Google Scholar

Santa Cruz de Prunes, M. I., 1979 La genèse du monde sensible dans la philosophie de Plotin (Presses universitaires de France).Google Scholar

Schäfer, C., 1998 ‘Proklos’ Argument aus De malorum subsistentia 31,5–21 in der modernen Interpretation’, in Meixner, U. and Newen, A. (eds.), Ancient Philosophy with a Focus on the Master Argument (Mentis), 173–85.Google Scholar

Schäfer, C., 2004 ‘Matter in Plotinus’s Normative Ontology’, Phronesis 49 (3): 266–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schenke, H.-M., 2012 ‘The Phenomenon and Significance of Sethian Gnosticism’, in Schenke Robinson, G., Schenke, G, and Plisch, U. (eds.), Der Same Seths: Hans-Martin Schenkes Kleine Schriften zu Gnosis, Koptologie und Neuem Testament (Brill), 501–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schibli, H. S., 1989 ‘Apprehending Our Happiness: Antilepsis and the Middle Soul in Plotinus, Ennead I 4.10’, Phronesis 34 (2): 205–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmidt, C., 1900 Plotins Stellung zum Gnosticismus und kirchlichen Christentum (H. C. Hinrichs).Google Scholar

Schmidt, C. and MacDermot, V., 1978 The Books of Jeu and the Untitled Text in the Bruce Codex (Brill).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schniewind, A., 2003 L’éthique du sage chez Plotin: Le paradigme du spoudaios (J. Vrin).Google Scholar

Schniewind, A., 2005 ‘The Social Concern of the Plotinian Sage’, in Smith, A. (ed.), The Philosopher and Society in Late Antiquity: Essays in Honour of Peter Brown (Classical Press of Wales), 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schniewind, A., 2015 ‘Plotinus’ Way of Defining “Eudaimonia” in Ennead I 4 [46] 1–3’, in Rabbås, Ø, Emilsson, E. K., Fossheim, H., and Tuominen, M. (eds.), The Quest for the Good Life: Ancient Philosophers on Happiness (Oxford University Press), 212–21.Google Scholar

Schroeder, F. M., 1987 ‘Ammonius Saccas’, in Haase, W. and Temporini, H. (eds.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, vol. 2, 36.1 (De Gruyter), 493–526.Google Scholar

Schroeder, F. M., 1992 Form and Transformation: A study in the philosophy of Plotinus (McGill-Queen’s University Press).Google Scholar

Schroeder, F. M., 1996 ‘Plotinus and Language’, in Gerson, L. P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus (Cambridge University Press), 336–55.Google Scholar

Schwab, W., 2020 ‘Plato’s Ideal Epistemology’, in Hetherington, S. and Smith, N. D. (eds.), What the Ancients Offer to Contemporary Epistemology (Routledge), 86–105.Google Scholar

Schwab, W., forthcoming ‘Non-Perceptual Kataleptic Impressions in Stoicism’.Google Scholar

Schwyzer, H.-R., 1951 ‘Plotinos’, in Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaften, vol. 21,1: Plautius–Polemokrates (J. B. Metzler), 471.62–592.5.Google Scholar

Schwyzer, H.-R., 1960 ‘“Bewusst” und “unbewusst” bei Plotin’, in Les Sources de Plotin. Entretiens sur l’Antiquité Classique, vol. 5 (Fondation Hardt), 341–78.Google Scholar

Schwyzer, H.-R., 1973 ‘Zu Plotins Deutung der sogenannten platonischen Materie’, in Zetesis: Album amicorum door vrienden en collega’s aangeboden aan Prof. Dr. Émile de Strycker (Nederlandsche Boekhandel), 266–80.Google Scholar

Schwyzer, H.-R., 1983 Ammonios Sakkas, der Lehrer Plotins (Westdeutscher Verlag).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scolnicov, S., 1983 ‘I Searched Myself’, Scripta Classica Israelica 7: 1–12.Google Scholar

Sedley, D., 1982 ‘The Stoic Criterion of Identity’, Phronesis 27 (3): 255–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sedley, D., 1999 ‘The Ideal of Godlikeness’, in Fine, G. (ed.), Plato 2: Ethics, Politics, Religion, and the Soul (Oxford University Press), 309–28.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W., 1982 ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias, On Time’, Phronesis 27 (1): 58–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sharples, R. W., 1994 ‘Plato, Plotinus, and Evil’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 39 (1): 171–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sharples, R. W., 2003 ‘Threefold Providence: The History and Background of a Doctrine’, in Sharples, R. W. and Sheppard, A. (eds.), Ancient Approaches to Plato’s Timaeus (Institute of Classical Studies), 107–27.Google Scholar

Simon, M., 1979 ‘From Greek Hairesis to Christian Heresy’, in Schoedel, W. R. and Wilken, R. L. (eds.), Early Christian Literature and the Classical Intellectual Tradition (Editions Beauchesne), 101–16.Google Scholar

Siorvanes, L., 1996 Proclus: Neo-Platonic Philosophy and Science (Edinburgh University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slaveva-Griffin, S., 2009 Plotinus on Number (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slaveva-Griffin, S., 2014 ‘Number in the Metaphysical Landscape’, in Remes, P. and Slaveva-Griffin, S. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism (Routledge), 200–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar