Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-fmrbl Total loading time: 0.893 Render date: 2022-09-29T06:17:33.464Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Select Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2021

Pasha L. Hsieh
Affiliation:
Singapore Management University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Acharya, Amitav, Foundations of Collective Action in Asia: Theory and Practice of Regional Cooperation, ADBI Working Paper Series, No. 344 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aggarwal, Vinod K. & Chow, Jonathan T., The Perils of Consensus: How ASEAN’s Meta-regime Undermines Economic and Environmental Cooperation, 17 (2) Rev. Int’l Pol. Econ. 262 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Araujo, Billy Melo, Labour Provisions in EU and US Mega-regional Trade Agreements: Rhetoric and Reality, 67 Int’l & Com. L. Q. 233 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archarya, Amitav, Ideas, Identity, and Institution-Building: From the “ASEAN Way” to the “Asia-Pacific Way”? 10 (3) Pac. Rev. 319 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ba, Alice, Institutional Divergence and Convergence in the Asia-Pacific? ASEAN in Practice and in Theory, 27 (2) Cam. Rev. Int’l Aff. 295 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Richard, A Domino Theory of Regionalism, NBER Working Paper Series, No. 4465 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Richard & Kawai, Masahiro, Multilateralizing Asian Regionalism, ADBI Working Paper Series, No. 431 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balganesh, Shyamkrishna, The Pragmatic Incrementalism of Common Law Intellectual Property, 63 (6) Vanderbilt L. Rev. 1543 (2010)Google Scholar
Bhagwati, Jagdish, Regionalism versus Multilateralism, 15 World Econ. 535 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biden, Joseph R. Jr., Why America Must Lead Again: Rescuing U.S. Foreign Policy After Trump, 99 (2) Foreign Aff. 64 (2020)Google Scholar
Blyde, Juan & Sinyavskaya, Natalia, The Impact of Liberalizing Trade in Services on Trade in Goods: An Empirical Investigation, 11 (3) Rev. Dev. Econ. 566 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, Anu, The Brussels Effect, 107 (1) NW. Univ. L. Rev. 1 (2012)Google Scholar
Brummer, Chris, Why Soft Law Dominates International Finance – and Not Trade, 13 (3) J. Int’l Econ. L. 623 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, Congyan, New Great Powers and International Law in the 21st Century, 24 (3) Eur. J. Int’l L. 755 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Kurt M. & Ratner, Ely, The China Reckoning: How Beijing Defied American Expectation, 97 (2) Foreign Aff. 60 (2018)Google Scholar
Camroux, David, Interregionalism or Merely a Fourth-Level Game? An Examination of the EU-ASEAN Relationship, 27 E. Asia 57 (2010)Google Scholar
Chaisse, Julien & Kirkwood, Jamieson, Chinese Puzzle: Anatomy of the (Invisible) Belt and Road Investment Treaty, 23 (1) J. Int’l Econ. L. 245 (2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaisse, Julien & Matshshita, Mitsuo, China’s “Belt and Road” Initiative: Mapping the World Trade Normative and Strategic Implications, 52 (1) J. World Trade 163 (2018)Google Scholar
Cho, Sungjoon, Breaking the Barrier between Regionalism and Multilateralism: A New Perspective on Trade Regionalism, 42 (2) Harv. Int’l L. J. 419 (2001)Google Scholar
Cho, Sungjoon & Kurtz, Jurgen, Legalizing the ASEAN Way: Adopting and Reimagining the ASEAN Investment Regime, 66 Am. J. Com. L. 233 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claussen, Kathleen, Dispute Settlement under the Next Generation of Free Trade Agreement, 46 (3) Ga. J. Int’l & Com. L. 611 (2018)Google Scholar
Clinton, Hillary, America’s Pacific Century, 189 Foreign Pol’y 56 (2011)Google Scholar
Conconi, Paola & Howse, Robert, Panel Report on EC-IT Products, 11 (2) World Trade Rev. 223 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cremona, Marise, Shaping EU Trade Policy Post-Lisbon: Opinion 2/15 of 16 May 2017, 14 Eur. Cont’l L. Rev. 231 (2018)Google Scholar
Dang, Le Ngoc et al., State-owned Enterprises Reform in Viet Nam: Progress and Challenges, ADBI Working Paper Series, No. 1071 (2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, Sanchita Basu et al., Can ASEAN+1 FTAs be a Pathway towards Negotiating and Designing the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) Agreement?, 50 (2) J. World Trade 253 (2016)Google Scholar
deLisle, Jacques, China’s Rise, the U.S., and the WTO: Perspectives from International Relations Theory, 2018 Univ. Ill. L. Rev. 57 (2018)Google Scholar
Desierto, Diane A., ASEAN’s Constitutionalization of International Law: Challenges to Evolution under the New ASEAN Charter, 49 Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 268 (2010–11)Google Scholar
Durán, Gracia Marín, Sustainable Development Chapters in EU Free Trade Agreements: Emerging Compliance Issues, 57 Common Market L. Rev. 1 (2020)Google Scholar
Elms, Deborah, Understanding the CPTPP, 6/2017 ASEAN Focus 8 (2017)Google Scholar
Freiber, Arie, Therapeutic Jurisprudence in Australia: Paradigm Shift or Pragmatic Incrementalism? 20 (2) L. in Context 6 (2003)Google Scholar
Fukunaga, Yoshifumi, Assessing the Progress of ASEAM MRAs on Professional Services, ERIA Discussion Paper Series (2015)Google Scholar
Fukunaga, Yoshifumi & Ishido, Hikari, Assessing the Progress of Services Liberalization in the ASEAN-China Free Trade Area (ACFTA), ERIA Discussion Paper Series (2013)Google Scholar
Fukunaga, Yoshifumi & Isono, Ikumo, Taking ASEAN+1 FTAs towards the RCEP: A Mapping Study, ERIA Discussion Paper Series (2013)Google Scholar
Fukunaga, Yuka, Japan’s Trade Policy in the Midst of Uncertainty, Aise.Visions, No. 112 (2020)Google Scholar
Galbraith, Jean, United States Continues to Block New Appellate Body Members for the World Trade Organization, Risking the Collapse of the Appellate Process, 113 (4) Am. J. Int’l L. 822 (2019)Google Scholar
Garzón, Jorge F., Multipolarity and the Future of Economic Regionalism, 9 (1) Int’l Theory 101 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilman, Nils, The New International Economic Order: A Reintroduction, 6 (1) Humanity 1 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilson, Julie, New Interregionalism? The EU and East Asia, 27 (3) Eur. Integration 307 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, Eastphalia Asian Regionalism, 44 UC Davis L. Rev. 859 (2010–11)Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, Authoritarian International Law, 114 (2) Am. J. Int’l L. 221 (2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goh, Evelyn, Great Powers and Hierarchical Order in Southeast Asia: Analyzing Regional Securities Strategies, 32 (3) Int’l Security 113 (2007/08)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T. & Meyer, Timothy L., International Soft Law, 2 (1) J. Legal Analysis 171 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamanaka, Shintaro & Jusoh, Sufian, Understanding the ASEAN Way of Regional Qualification Governance: The Case of Mutual Recognition Agreements in the Professional Service Sector, 12 (4) Reg. & Governance 486 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, Oona A., International Delegation and State Sovereignty, 71 (1) L. & Contemp. Problems 115 (2008)Google Scholar
Hettne, Björn, Beyond the “New” Regionalism, 10 (4) New Pol. Eco 543 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillgenberg, Harmut, A Fresh Look at Soft Law, 10 (3) Eur. J. Int’l L. 500 (1999)Google Scholar
Hoang, Ha Hai, Normative Power Europe through Trade: Vietnamese Perceptions, 30 (2) Int’l Rel. 176 (2015)Google Scholar
Hoang, Ha Hai & Sicurelli, Daniela, The EU’s Preferential Trade Agreements with Singapore and Vietnam: Market vs. Normative Imperatives, 23 (4) Contemp. Pol. 369 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, Claudia et al., Horizontal Depth: A New Database on the Content of Preferential Trade Agreements, Policy Research Working Paper, No. 7981 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hradilová, Kateřina & Svoboda, Ondřej, Sustainable Development Chapters in the EU Free Trade Agreements: Searching for Effectiveness, 52 (6) J. World Trade 1019 (2018)Google Scholar
Hsieh, Pasha L., The Taiwan Question and the One-China Policy: Legal Challenges with Renewed Momentum, 84 (3) Die Friedens-Warte: J. Int’l Peace & Organ. 59 (2009)Google Scholar
Hsieh, Pasha L., The China-Taiwan ECFA, Geopolitical Dimensions and WTO Law, 14 (1) J. Int’l Econ. L. 121 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, Pasha L., Reassessing the Trade-Development Nexus in International Economic Law: The Paradigm Shift in Asia-Pacific Regionalism, 37 (2) NW J. Int’l L. & Bus. 321 (2017)Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John, The End of International Order? 94 (1) Int’l Aff. 7 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John, The Next Liberal Order: The Age of Contagion Demands More Internationalism, Not Less, 99 (4) Foreign Aff. 133 (2020)Google Scholar
Ing, Lili Yan et al., How Do Exports and Imports Affect the Use of Free Trade Agreements? Firm-level Survey Evidence from Southeast Asia, ERIA Discussion Paper Series (2016)Google Scholar
Kang, David, South Korean and Taiwanese Development and the New Institutional Economics, 49 (3) Int’l Organ. 555 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawai, Masahiro & anda Naknoi, K, ASEAN Economic Integration through Trade and Foreign Direct Investment: Long-Term Challenges, ADBI Working Paper Series, No. 545 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsey, Jane, The Risks for ASEAN of New Mega-Agreements that Promote the Wrong Model of e-Commerce, ERIA Discussion Paper Series (2017)Google Scholar
Kikuchi, Tomoo et al., The Effects of Mega-Regional Trade Agreements to Vietnam, 55 J. Asian Eco. 4 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Dong-Young, Adapting the MGA for Negotiating with South Korean Counterparts, Asialink Bus. (2015)Google Scholar
Kim, Samuel S., Regionalization and Regionalism in Asia, 4 (1) J. E Asian Stud. 39 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleimann, David & Kübek, Gesa, The Signing, Provisional Application, and Conclusion of Trade and Investment Agreements in the EU: The Case of CETA and Opinion 2/15, 45 (1) Legal Issues Eco. Integration 13 (2018)Google Scholar
Kojima, Kiyoshi, The “Flying Geese” Model of Asian Economic Development: Origin, Theoretical Extensions, and Regional Policy Implications, 11 J. Asian Econ. 375 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kong, Qingjiang, U.S.-China Bilateral Investment Treaty Negotiations: Context, Focus, and Implications, 7 (1) Asian J. WTO & Int’l Health and Policy 181 (2012)Google Scholar
Krauthammer, Charles, The Unipolar Moment, 70 Foreign Aff. 23 (1990–91)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamy, Pascal, Unlocking the Potential of the ASEAN-EU Partnership: The Role of Singapore, 2 Asia Eur. J 485 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Hsien Loong, The Endangered Asian Century: America, China and the Perils of Confrontation, 99 (4) Foreign Aff. 52 (2020)Google Scholar
Lee, Seungjoo, Institutional Balancing and the Politics of Mega-FTAs in East Asia, 56 Asian Survey 1055 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lester, Simon & Manak, Inu, The Rise of Populist Nationalism and Renegotiation of NAFTA, 21 (1) J. Int’l Econ. L. 151 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leutert, Wendy & Haver, Zachary, From Cautious Interaction to Mature Influence: China’s Evolving Engagement with the International Investment Regime, 93 (1) Pac. Aff. 59 (2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Meredith Kolsky, The Origin of Plurilateralism in International Trade Law, 20 J. Inv. & Trade 633 (2019)Google Scholar
Lim, Darren J. & Cooper, Zack, Reassessing Hedging: The Logic of Alignment in East Asia, 24 (4) Sec. Stud. 696 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, Paul Joseph, ASEAN’s Relations with the EU: Obstacles and Opportunities, EU External Aff. Rev. 46 (2012)Google Scholar
Limenta, Michelle, Palm Oil for Fuels: WTO Rules and Environmental Protection, 15 (7) Global Trade & Customs J. 321 (2020)Google Scholar
Lin, Justin Yifu, From Flying Geese to Leading Dragons New Opportunities and Strategies for Structural Transformation in Developing Countries, Policy Research Working Paper, No. 5702 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Tsai-Yu, Systemic Reflection on the EC-IT Product Case: Establishing an “Understanding” on Maintaining the Product Coverage of the Current Information Technology Agreement in the Face of Technological Change, 45 (2) J. World Trade 401 (2011)Google Scholar
Liu, Han-Wei & Peng, Shin-Yi, Managing Trade Conflicts in the ICT Industry: A Case Study of EU–Greater China Area, 19 (3) J. Int’l Econ. L. 629 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magiera, Stephen L., International Investment Agreements and Investor-State Disputes: A Review and Evaluation for Indonesia, ERIA Discussion Series (2017)Google Scholar
Manea, Maria-Gabriela, Human Rights and the Interregional Dialogue between Asia and Europe: ASEAN-EU Relations and ASEM, 21 (3) Pac. Rev. 369 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manners, Ian, Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?, 40 (2) J. Common Market Stud. 235 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manners, Ian & Whitman, Richard, The “Difference Engine”: Constructing and Representing the International Identity of the European Union, 10 (3) J. Eur. Pub. Pol’y 380 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D. & Solingen, Etel, Regionalism, 13 Ann. Rev. Pol. Sci. 145 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D. & Milner, Helen V., The New Wave of Regionalism, 53 (3) Int’l Organ. 589 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marhold, Anna-Alexandra, Externalising Europe’s Energy Policy in EU Free Trade Agreements: A Cognitive Dissonance between Promoting Sustainable Development and Ensuing Security of Supply, 3 (1) Eur & World: A L. Rev. 1 (2019)Google Scholar
Mattoo, Aaditya et al., Trade Creation and Trade Diversion in Deep Agreements, Policy Research Working Paper, No. 8206 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, Lachlan & Meissner, Katharina L., Human Rights Conditionality in European Union Trade Negotiations: The Case of the EU-Singapore FTA, 55 (4) J. Common Market Stud.832 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, Mark, Defining a State-Owned Enterprise in International Investment Agreements, 34 (3) ICSID Rev. 595 (2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medalla, Erlinda M. & Supperamaniam, M., Suggested Rules of Origin Regime for EAFTA, Philippine Inst. for Dev. Stud. Discussion Paper Series No. 2008–22 (Rev.) (2009)Google Scholar
Mercurio, Bryan, Trade Liberalisation in Asia: Why Intra-Asian Free Trade Agreements Are Not Utilised By the Business Community, 6 (1) Asian J. WTO & Int’l Health L. & Pol. 109 (2011)Google Scholar
Mitchell, Jonathan, An Unconventional but Essential Marriage: Pro-Poor Tourism and the Mainstream Industry, Private Sector & Dev., No. 7 (2010)Google Scholar
Moranda, Noel M., Europe and Southeast Asia: ASEAN-EU Interregionalism between Pluralist and Solidarist Societies, 4 (3) Rev. Eur. Stud. 89 (2012)Google Scholar
Morris-Sharma, Natalie Y., The Singapore Convention is Live, and Multilateralism, Alive, 20 (4) Cardozo J. Conflict Resol. 1009 (2019)Google Scholar
Nguyen, Trang (Mae), International Law as Hedging: Perspectives from Secondary Authoritarian States, 114 Am. J. Int’l L. Unbound 237 (2020)Google Scholar
Nixon, Richard M., Asia After Viet Nam, 46 (1) Foreign Aff. 111 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nottage, Luke, The Investment Chapter and ISDS in the TPP: Lessons from Southeast Asia, ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute Economics Working Papers, No. 2017–2 (2017)Google Scholar
Ong, Bernard, Recognizing Regions: ASEAN’ Struggles for Recognition, 25 (4) Pac. Rev. 513 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orakhelashvili, Alexander, Article 30 of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: Application of the Successive Treaties Relating to the Same Subject-Matter, 31 ICSID Rev. 344 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ota, Yasu & Maruyama, Shuichi, Ocean’s Eleven, 2018–12–18 Nikkei Asian Rev. 10 (2018)Google Scholar
Pakrashi, Debayan & Frijters, Paul, Takeoffs, Landing, and Economic Growth, ADBI Working Paper Series, Nov. 641 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Sung-Hoon & Lee, Jeong Yoen, APEC at Crossroads: Challenges and Opportunities, 33 (2) Asian Persp. 97 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petri, Peter A. & Plummer, Michael G., East Asia Decouples from the United States: Trade War, COVID-19, and East Asia’s New Trade Blocs, PIIE Working Paper (2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinchis-Paulsen, Mona, Trade Multilateralism and U.S. National Security: The Making of the GATT Security Exceptions, 41 Mich. J. Int’l L. 109 (2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Adrian Hyde, Normative” Power Europe: A Realist Critique, 13 (2) J. Eur. Pub. Pol’y 217 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quimba, Francis A. & Barral, Mark Anthony A., The Evolution of APEC and Its Role in the Philippine Trade and Investment, PIDS Discussion Paper Series, No. 2019–07 (2019)Google Scholar
Roberts, Anthea et al., Toward a Geoeconomic Order in International Trade and Investment, 22 J. Int’l Econ. L. 655 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robles, Alfred C., Jr, An EU-ASEAN FTA: The EU’s Failure as an International Actor, 13 Eur. Foreign Aff. Rev. 541 (2008)Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard, International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order, 36 (2) Int’l Organ. 379 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, Theotonio Dos, The Structure of Dependence, 60 Am. Econ. Rev. 231 (1970)Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory & Gao, Henry, A New Chinese Economic Order? 23 (3) J. Int’l Econ. L. 607 (2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, Surendar & Singh, Ram, Domestic Sources of India’s Trade Policy References in RCEP Negotiations, 54 (4) J. World Trade 503 (2020)Google Scholar
Söderbaum, Fredrik & Van Langenhove, Luk, Introduction: The EU as a Global Actor and the Role of Interregionalism, 27 (3) Eur. Integration 249 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suse, Andrei & Wouters, Jan, Exploring the Boundaries of Provisional Application: The EU’s Mixed Trade and Investment Agreements, 53 (3) J. World Trade 395 (2019)Google Scholar
Tang, Siew Mun, Is ASEAN Due for a Makeover, 39 (2) Contem. Southeast Asia 239 (2017)Google Scholar
Tang, Siew Mun, ASEAN’s Hard Look at Indo-Pacific, 3/2018 ASEAN Focus 6 (2018)Google Scholar
Tang, Siew Mun et al., Survey Report: State of Southeast Asia: 2019, 1/2019 ASEAN Focus 6 (2019)Google Scholar
Tham, Siew Yean, ASEAN Trade in Services Agreement (ATISA: Advancing Services Liberalization for ASEAN? 54 Persp. 1 (2019)Google Scholar
Tho, Tran Van, The Middle-Income Trap: Issues for Members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, ADBI Working Paper Series, No. 421 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, Goh Chok, Asia – Catalyst for Global Economic Integration, 2 Asia Eur. J. 1 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urata, Shujiro, Constructing and Multilateralizing the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership: An Asian Perspective, ADBI Working Paper Series, No. 449 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandewalle, Laurence, The ASEAN Inter-Parliamentary Assembly (AIPA): A Privileged Interlocutor for the European Parliament in South East Asia (2015)Google Scholar
Walt, Stephan M., Alliance Formation and the Balance of Power, 9 (4) Int’l Sec. 3 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Heng, China’s Approach to the Belt and Road Initiative: Scope, Character and Sustainability, 22 (1) J. Int’l Econ. L. 29 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, Michael C. & Krasner, Stephen D., Hegemonic Stability Theory: An Empirical Assessment, 15 (2) Rev. Int’l Stud. 183 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander, Collective Identity Formation and the International State, 88 (2) Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 384 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, John, The Strange History of the Washington Consensus, 27 (2) J. Post Keynesian Eco.195 (2004)Google Scholar
Wilson, Jeffery D., Mega-Regional Trade Deals in the Asia-Pacific: Choosing Between the TPP and RCEP?, 45 (2) J. Contemp. Asia 343 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, Benjamin, Data Localization and ASEAN Economic Community, 10 Asian J. Int’l L.158 (2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woon, Walter, Resolving Territorial Disputes in ASEAN, 30 Chinese (Taiwan) YB Int’l L. & Aff. 1 (2012)Google Scholar
Zhong, Zewei, The ASEAN Comprehensive Investment Agreement: Realizing a Regional Community, 6 (1) Asian J. Comp. L. 1 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Secondary Sources

Abrenica, Joy et al., The Future of Trade in Services for Developing Countries, in Trade and Poverty Reduction in the Asia-Pacific Region: Case Studies and Lessons from Low-Income Communities (Andrew L. Stoler et al. eds. 2009)Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav, The Making of Southeast Asia: International Relations of a Region (2000)Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav, The Quest for Identity: International Relations of Southeast Asia (2000)Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav, Whose Ideas Matter? Agency and Power in Asian Regionalism (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acharya, Amitav, Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order (3d 2014)Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav, Regionalism beyond EU-Centrism, in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism (Tanja A. Börzel & Thomas Risse 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aggarwal, Vinod K. & Fogarty, Edward A., Between Regionalism and Globalism: European Union Interregional Trade Strategies, in EU Trade Strategies: Between Regionalism and Globalism (Vinod K. Aggarwal & Edward A. Fogarty eds. 2004)Google Scholar
Aggarwal, Vinod K. & Kwei, Elaine, Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC): Transregionalism with a New Cause?, in Interregionalism and International Relations (Heiner Hänggi et al. eds. 2006)Google Scholar
Allison, Graham, Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap (2017)Google Scholar
Ba, Alice, (Re)Negotiating East and Southeast Asia: Region, Regionalism, and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (2009)Google Scholar
Beth, Vivienne & Nottage, Luke, International Investment Agreement and Investor-State Arbitration in Asia, in Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy (Julien Chaisse et al. eds. 2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhagwati, Jagdish, Termites in the Trading System: How Preferential Agreements Undermine Free Trade (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borthwick, Mark, Building Momentum: The Movement Toward Pacific Economic Cooperation Prior to 1980, in The Evolution of PECC: The First 25 Years (2005)Google Scholar
Börzel, Tanja A. & Thomas Risse, Introduction: Framework of the Handbook and Conceptual Clarifications, in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism (Tanja A. Börzel & Thomas Risse 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, Anu, The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World (2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breslin, Shaun et al., Regions in Comparative Perspective, in New Regionalism in the Global Political Economy: Theories and Cases (Shaun Breslin et al. eds. 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Chester & Winch, Phoebe, The Confidentiality and Transparency Debate in Commercial and Investment Mediation, in Mediation in International Commercial and Investment Disputes (Catherine Titi & Katia Fach Gómez eds. 2019)Google Scholar
Brummer, Chris, Soft Law and the Global Financial System: Rule Making in the 21st Century (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Cavinder, Enhancing the Rule of Law in Investor-State Dispute Settlement, in The ASEAN Law Conference 2018: A Compendium of Speeches, Papers, Presentations and Reports (2019)Google Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique & Faletto, Enzo, Dependency and Development in Latin America (Marjory Mattingly Urquidi trans., 1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaisse, Julien, The ACIA: Much More Than a BIT of Protection for Foreign Investors, in ASEAN Law in the New Regional Economic Order (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaisse, Julien & Jusoh, Sufian, The ASEAN Comprehensive Investment Agreement: The Regionalisation of Laws and Policy on Foreign Investment (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, Man-jung Mignonne, APEC’s Eye on the Prize: Participants, Modality, and Confidence-Building, in APEC at 20: Recall, Reflect, Remake (K. Kesavapany and Hank Lim eds. 2009)Google Scholar
Chen, Christopher, ASEAN Financial Integration and the Belt and Road Initiative: Legal Challenges and Opportunities for China in Southeast Asia, in International Governance and the Rule of Law in China under the Belt and Road Initiative (Yun Zhao ed. 2018)Google Scholar
China in the International Economic Order: New Directions and Changing Paradigms (Lisa Toohey et al. eds. 2015)Google Scholar
Chow, Michael Ewing & Yusran, Ranyta, The ASEAN Trade Dispute Settlement Mechanism, in The Legitimacy of International Trade Courts and Tribunals (Robert Howse et al. eds. 2018)Google Scholar
Closa, Carlo & Casni, Lorenzo, Comparative Regional Integration: Governance and Legal Models (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coicaud, Jean Marc, Legitimacy and Politics: A Contribution to the Study of Political Right and Political Responsibility (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cremona, Marise, Distinguished Essay: A Quiet Revolution – The Changing Nature of the EU’s Common Commercial Policy, in 2017:8 Eur. YB Int’l Econ. L. (Marc Bungenberg et al. eds. 2017)Google Scholar
Crozier, Andrew J., The Trade and Aid Policy of the European Union: A Historical Perspective, in EU-ASEAN: Facing Economic Globalisation (Paul J. J. Welfens et al. 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dent, Christopher M., East Asian Regionalism (2d. ed. 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeRosa, Dean A., US Free Trade Agreements with ASEAN, in Free Trade Agreements: US Strategies and Priorities (Jeffrey J. Schott ed. 2004)Google Scholar
Dothan, Shai & Lam, Joanna, A Paradigm Shift? Arbitration and Court-Like Mechanism in Investors’ Disputes, in 2020 Eur. YB Int’l Econ. L. (Güneş Ünüvar et al. eds. 2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowdle, Michael W. et al., Dialogus de Beijing Consensus, in The Beijing Consensus? How Chian Has Changed Western Ideas of Law and Economic Development (Weitseng Chen ed. 2017)Google Scholar
Elek, Andrew, Back to Canberra: Founding APEC, in The Evolution of PECC: The First 25 Years (2005)Google Scholar
Elek, Andrew, Overview, in The Evolution of PECC: The First 25 Years (2005)Google Scholar
Elms, Deborah K. & C. L. Lim, An Overview and Snapshot of the TPP Negotiations, in The Trans-Pacific Partnership: A Quest for a Twenty-first-Century Trade Agreement (C. L. Lim et al. eds. 2012)Google Scholar
Flaaen, Aaron et al., How to Avoid Middle-Income Traps? Evidence from Malaysia, World Bank: Economic Premise, No. 120 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, Ellen L., Asia’s New Regionalism (2008)Google Scholar
Fukunaga, Yoshifumi, Challenges of ASEAN MRAs on Professional Services, in ASEAN Law in the New Regional Economic Order: Global Trends and Shifting Paradigms (Pasha L. Hsieh & Bryan Mercurio eds. 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gathii, James Thuo, African Regional Trade Agreements as Legal Regimes (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, Alan, Must Global Politics Constrain Democracy? Great-Power Realism, Democratic Peace, and Democratic Internationalism (1999)Google Scholar
Gold, Thomas Baron, State and Society in the Taiwan Miracle (1986)Google Scholar
Gu, Weixia, China’s Arbitration Modernisation under Judicial Efforts and Marketisation Waves, in The Developing World of Arbitration: A Comparative Study of Arbitration Reform in the Asia Pacific (Anselmo Reyes & Weixia Gu eds. 2018)Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, Developmental States (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamanaka, Shintaro, Accession to TPP: Veto Power and “Opt-Out” Option, in Paradigm Shift in International Economic Law Rule-Making: TPP as a New Model for Trade Agreements? (Julien Chaisse et al. eds. 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hänggi, Heiner, Interregionalism as a Multifaceted Phenomenon: In Search of a Typology, in Interregionalism and International Relations: A Stepping Stone to Global Governance? (Jürgen Ruland et al. 2005)Google Scholar
Hettne, Björn, The New Regionalism: Implications for Development and Peace, in The New Regionalism: Implications for Global Development and International Security, UNU/WIDER World Institute for Development Economics Research (Björn Hettne & András Inotai 1994)Google Scholar
Hoa, Tran Van, Globalisation, Crises and the Emergence of New Asian Regionalism: Genesis and Current Development, in New Asian Regionalism: Responses to Globalisation and Crises (Tran Van Hoa & Charles Harve eds. 2003)Google Scholar
Hsieh, Pasha L., China-Taiwan Free Trade Agreement, in Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements: Case Studies (Simon Lester et al. eds. 2d ed. 2015)Google Scholar
Hsieh, Pasha L., Transnational Legal Services in Asia: Legal Implications of the AEC and the CPTPP, in ASEAN Law in the New Regional Economic Order: Global Trends and Shifting Paradigms (Pasha L. Hsieh & Bryan Mercurio 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, Locknie, EU-ASEAN Trade and Investment Relations with a Special Focus on Singapore, in 2015:6 Eur. YB Int’l Econ. L. (Christoph Herrmann et al. eds. 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurell, Andrew, Regionalism in Theoretical Perspective, in Regionalism in World Politics: Regional Organization and International Order (Louise Fawcett & Andrew Hurrell eds. 1995)Google Scholar
Inama, Stefano & Sim, Edmund W., Rules of Origin in ASEAN: A Way Forward (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ing, Lili Yang et al., NTMs in ASEAN: Ways toward Regulatory Convergence, in Regional Integration and Non-Tariff Measures in ASEAN (Lili Yan Ing et al. eds. 2019)Google Scholar
Jetschke, Anja et al., Asia, in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism (Tanja A. Börzel & Thomas Risse 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jusoh, Sufian, Investment Liberalization in ASEAN: Moving Myths to Reality, in ASEAN Law in the New Regional Economic Order: Global Trends and Shifting Paradigms (Pasha L. Hsieh & Bryan Mercurio 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karton, Joshua, Beyond the “Harmonious Confucian”: International Commercial Arbitration and the Impact of Chinese Cultural Values, in Legal Thoughts between the East and the West in the Multilevel Legal Order: Liber Amicorum in Honor of Professor Herbert Han-pao Ma (Chang-fa Lo et al. eds. 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., Introduction: Asian Regionalism in Comparative Perspective, in Network Power: Japan and Asia (Peter J. Katzenstein & Takashi Shiraishi eds. 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawai, Masahiro & Wignaraja, Ganeshan, Main Findings and Policy Implications, in Asia’s Free Trade Agreements: How is Business Responding? (2011)Google Scholar
Kiang, Lim Hng to Anand Sharma, Special Scheme for Registration of Generic Medicinal Products from India (2010)Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict et al., Introduction: The Essence, Significance, and Problems of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, in Megaregulation Contested: Global Economic Ordering after TPP (Benedict Kingsbury et al. eds. 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirshner, Jonathan, Realist Political Economy: Traditional Themes and Contemporary Challenges, in Routledge Handbook of International Political Economy (IPE): IPE as a Global Conversation 36 (Mark Blyth ed. 2009)Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry, World Order (2014)Google Scholar
Koh, Tommy, The United States and Southeast Asia, in America’s Role in Asia, Asian and American Views: Recommendations for U.S. Policy from Both Sides of the Pacific (2008)Google Scholar
Kuijper, Peter Jan et al., From Treaty-Making to Treaty-Breaking: Models for ASEAN External Trade Agreements (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, Csilla & Nilsson, Lars, The EU-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Anticipation, Trade Policy Uncertainty and Impact, Chief Economist Note (2015)Google Scholar
Lenz, Tobias & Marks, Gary, Regional Institutional Design, in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism (Tanja A. Börzel & Thomas Risse 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leong, Susanna H. S., European Union-Singapore Free Trade Agreement: A New Chapter for Geographical Indications in Singapore, in Geographical Indications at the Crossroads of Trade, Development, and Culture: Focus on Asia-Pacific (Irene Calboli & Wee Loon Ng-Loy eds. 2017)Google Scholar
Lester, Simon et al., Trump’s First Trade Dal, Free Trade Bulletin, No. 73 (2019)Google Scholar
Lim, C. L. et al., What is “High-Quality, Twenty-First Century” Anyway? in The Trans-Pacific Partnership: A Quest for a Twenty-first-Century Trade Agreement (C. L. Lim et al. eds. 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Han-Wei, Data Localization and Digital Trade Barriers: ASEAN in Megaregionalism, in ASEAN Law in the New Regional Economic Order (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincoln, Edward J., East Asian Economic Regionalism (2004)Google Scholar
Mahbubani, Kishore & Sng, Jeffery, The ASEAN Miracle: A Catalyst for Peace (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James et al., Dependency Theory, in The Oxford Handbook of the Politics of Development (Carol Lancaster & Nicolas van de Walle 2018)Google Scholar
Mann, Catherine & Liu, Xuepeng, The Information Technology Agreement: Sui Generis or Model Stepping Stone?, in Multilateralizing Regionalism: Challenges for the Global Trading System (Richard Baldwin & Patrick Low eds. 2009)Google Scholar
Mattoo, Aaditya & Zanini, Gianni, Services Trade Agreements and Negotiations: An Overview, in Handbook of Trade Policy for Development (Arvid Lukauskas et al. eds. 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Megaregulation Contested: Global Economic Ordering after TPP (Benedict Kingsbury et al. 2019)Google Scholar
Nguyen, Minh Hue et al., The ASEAN Trade in Goods Agreement: Evolution and Regional Implications, in ASEAN Law in the New Regional Economic Order: Global Trends and Shifting Paradigms (Pasha L. Hsieh & Bryan Mercurio eds. 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohan, Mahdev, The European Union’s Free Trade Agreement with Singapore – One Step Forward, 28 Steps Back? in International Investment Treaties and Arbitration Across Asia (Julien Chaisse & Luke Nottage eds. 2018)Google Scholar
Natalegawa, Marty, Does ASEAN Matter? A View from Within (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Network Power: Japan and Asia (Peter J. Katzenstein & Takashi Shiraishi eds. 1997)Google Scholar
Nikomborirak, Deunden & Jitdumrong, Supunnavadee, ASEAN Trade in Services, in The ASEAN Economic Community: A Work in Progress (Sanchita Basu Das ed. 2013)Google Scholar
Ogita, Tatsushi, Japan: The Structure of Complete Objection, in Trade Liberalization and APEC (Jiro Okamoto ed. 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostry, Sylvia, The Uruguay Round North-South Grand Bargain: Implications for Future Negotiations, in The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec (Daniel L. M. Kennedy & James D. Southwick eds. 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradigm Shift in International Economic Law Rule-Making: TPP as a New Model for Trade Arrangements? (Julien Chaisse et al. eds. 2017)Google Scholar
Peet, Richard & Hartwick, Elaine, Theories of Development: Contentions, Arguments, Alternatives (3d ed. 2015)Google Scholar
Pempel, T. J., Transpacific Torri: Japan and the Emerging Asian Regionalism, in Network Power: Japan and Asia (Peter J. Katzenstein & Takashi Shiraishi eds. 1997)Google Scholar
Rashid, Zakariah et al., Regional Market for Goods, Services, and Skilled Labor, in Realizing the ASEAN Economic Community: A Comprehensive Assessment (Michael G. Plummer & Chia Siow Yue eds. 2009)Google Scholar
Ravenhill, John, APEC and the Construction of Pacific Rim Regionalism (2001)Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani, Straight Talk on Trade: Ideas for a Sane World Economy (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolland, Sonia E., Development at the WTO (2012)Google Scholar
Roloff, Ralf, Interregionalism in Theoretical Perspective: State of the Art, in Interregionalism and International Relations: A Stepping Stone to Global Governance? (Jürgen Ruland et al. 2005)Google Scholar
Romanchyshyna, Iulianna, Tackling Technical Barriers to Trade in EU “New Generation” FTAs: An Example of Open or Conflicting Regionalism? in Global Politics and EU Trade Policy: Facing the Challenges to a Multilateral Approach, Special Issue: Eur. YB Int’l Econ. L. (Wolfgang Weiß & Cornelia Furculita eds. 2020)Google Scholar
Rossman, Ithnain, The Goods Package, in The United States-Singapore Free Trade Agreement: Highlights and Insights (Tommy Koh & Chang Li Lin eds. 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruland, Jürgen, Interregionalism: An Unfinished Agenda, in Interregionalism and International Relations: A Stepping Stone to Global Governance? (Jürgen Ruland et al. 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sally, Razeen, Southeast Asia in the WTO (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sally, Razeen, ASEAN FTAs: State of Play and Outlook for ASEAN’s Regional and Global Integration, in The ASEAN Economic Community: A Work in Progress (Sanchita Basu Das et al. eds. 2013)Google Scholar
Sasradipoera, Kanya Satyani, ASEAN Trade in Goods Agreement (ATIGA), in ASEAN: Life after the Charter (S. Tiwari ed. 2010)Google Scholar
Severino, Rodolfo C., Southeast Asia in Search of an ASEAN Community: Insights from the Former ASEAN Secretary-General (2006)Google Scholar
Severino, Rodolfo C., Japan’s Relations with ASEAN, in ASEAN-Japan Relations (Takashi Shiraishi & Takaaki Kojima eds. 2014)Google Scholar
Siong, David Chin Soon, ASEAN’s Journey towards Free Trade, in Economic Diplomacy: Essays and Reflections by Singapore’s Negotiations (C. L. Lim & Margaret Liang eds. 2011)Google Scholar
So, Alvin Y., Social Change and Development: Modernization, Dependency, and World-System Theories (1990)Google Scholar
Söderbaum, Fredrik, Rethinking Regionalism (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Söderbaum, Fredrik, Old, New, and Comparative Regionalism: The History and Scholarly Development of the Field, in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism (Tanja A. Borzel & Thomas Risse 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soesastro, Hadi, Revamping APEC’s Concerted Unilateral Liberalization, in APEC at 20: Recall, Reflect, Remake (K. Kesavapany and Hank Lim eds. 2009)Google Scholar
Sudo, Sueo, Japan’s ASEAN Policy: In Search of Proactive Multilateralism (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Telò, Mario, Introduction: Globalization, New Regionalism and the Role of the European Union, in European Union and New Regionalism: Competing Regionalism and Global Governance in a Post-Hegemonic Era (Mario Telò ed. 2014)Google Scholar
Yean, Tham Siew & Das, Sanchita Basu, Introduction: The ASEAN Economic Community and Conflicting Domestic Interests, in Moving the AEC Beyond 2015: Managing Domestic Consensus for Community-Building (Tham Siew Yean & Sanchita Basu Das eds. 2016)Google Scholar
Thomas, Chantal & Trachtman, Joel P., Editors’ Introduction, in Developing Countries in the WTO Legal System (Chantal Thomas & Joel P. Trachtman eds. 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The China-Australia Free Trade Agreement: A 21st Century Model (Colin B. Picker et al. eds. 2018)Google Scholar
Titi, Catherine, Recent Developments in International Investment Law, in 2018:9 Eur. YB Int’l Econ. L. (Marc Bungenberg et al. eds. 2019)Google Scholar
Townsend, Belinda, Update on the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement – NGO Briefing (2015)Google Scholar
Venzke, Ingo and Thio, Li-Ann, The Internal Effects of ASEAN External Relations (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voon, Tania & Sheargold, Elizabeth, Australia, China and the Co-Existence of Successive International Investment Agreements, in The China-Australia Free Trade Agreement: A 21st Century Model (Colin B. Picker et al. eds. 2017)Google Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H., ASEAN Law, the ASEAN Way and the Role of Domestic Courts, in The ASEAN Law Conference 2018: A Compendium of Speeches, Papers, Presentations and Reports 43 (2019)Google Scholar
Wohlforth, William C., Realism, in The Oxford Handbook of International Relations 131 (Christian Reus-Smit & Duncan Snidal eds. 2008)Google Scholar
Woon, Walter, The ASEAN Charter: A Commentary (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamazawa, Ippei, APEC’s Achievements and Tasks, in APEC in the 21st Century (Riyana Miranti & Denis Hew eds. 2004)Google Scholar
Yamazawa, Ippei, APEC: New Agenda in Its Third Decade (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanai, Akiko, Characteristics of APEC Trade Liberalization: A Comparative Analysis with the WTO, in Trade Liberalization and APEC (Jiro Okamoto ed. 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeo, Lay Hwee, EU-ASEAN Security Cooperation, in EU Security Strategies: Extending the EU System of Security Governance (Spyros Economides & James Sperling eds. 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahearn, Raymond J. & Morrison, Wayne M., U.S.-Thailand Free Trade Agreements, CRS Report (2006)Google Scholar
AIPO, Resolution of the Ninth General Assembly of AIPO on the ASEAN-EC Economic Cooperation, WC/GA9/88/KL/29/6 (1988)Google Scholar
Analyst in Asian Affairs, Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division, The Vietnam-U.S. Bilateral Trade Agreement, CRS Report (2002)Google Scholar
APEC Counter-Terrorism Working Group Strategic Plan 2018–2020 (2017)Google Scholar
APEC Economic Leaders’ Declaration (2001)Google Scholar
APEC Non-Binding Investment Principles (2011)Google Scholar
APEC Non-binding Principles for Domestic Regulation of the Services Sector (2018)Google Scholar
APEC Policy Support Unit Governance Arrangements (2018)Google Scholar
APEC PSU, Annual Report 2018 (2018)Google Scholar
APEC PSU, APEC in Charts 2019 (2019)Google Scholar
APEC PSU, APEC Regional Trends Analysis: Counting What Counts (2019)Google Scholar
APEC PSU, APEC Supply-Chain Connectivity Framework Action Plan 2017–2020: Interim Review of External Indicators (2019)Google Scholar
APEC PSU, APEC’s Bogor Goals Progress Report (2018)Google Scholar
APEC PSU, APEC’s Ease of Doing Business – Final Assessment 2015–2018 (2019)Google Scholar
APEC PSU Five-Year Strategic Plan 2013–2017 (2013)Google Scholar
APEC PSU, Peer Review and Capacity Building on APEC Infrastructure Development and Investment: The Philippines (2017)Google Scholar
APEC PSU, The Mutual Usefulness between APEC and TPP (2011)Google Scholar
APEC PSU, Trends and Developments in Provisions and Outcomes of RTA/FTAs Implemented in 2017 by APEC Economies (2018)Google Scholar
APEC Secretariat, APEC Guidebook on Quality of Infrastructure Development and Investment (Revision) (2018)Google Scholar
APEC Secretariat, APEC Outcomes & Outlook 2018–2019 (2019)Google Scholar
APEC Secretariat, APEC Secretariat’s 2019 Operational Plan (2019)Google Scholar
APEC Secretariat, APEC’s Second Trade Facilitation Action Plan (2007)Google Scholar
APEC Secretariat, Guidelines for Hosting APEC Meetings (2017)Google Scholar
APEC Secretariat, IAP Peer Review: Review Teams, Timeline and List of Experts, 2008/SOM1/014, March 2–3, 2008Google Scholar
APEC Secretariat, Supporting Continued Growth in Trade and Facilitation: End to End Review of the APEC Business Travel Card Scheme Final Report (2014)Google Scholar
APEC Vision Group, Report of the APEC Vision Group – People and Prosperity: An APEC Vision to 2040 (2019)Google Scholar
APEC’s Achievements in Trade Facilitation in 2007–2010: Final Assessment of the Second Trade Facilitation Action (TFAP II) (2012)Google Scholar
ASEAN, ASEAN Economic Community 2025 Consolidated Strategic Action Plan (2017)Google Scholar
ASEAN, ASEAN Integration Report 2019 (2019)Google Scholar
ASEAN, ASEAN Key Figures 2019 (2019)Google Scholar
ASEAN, ASEAN Key Figures 2020 (2020)Google Scholar
ASEAN, ASEAN Mutual Recognition Arrangement on Tourism Professionals (MRA): Handbook (2013)Google Scholar
ASEAN, ASEAN Services Report 2017: The Evolving Landscape (2017)Google Scholar
ASEAN, Investing in ASEAN: Association of Southeast Asian Nations (2019/2020)Google Scholar
ASEAN, Master Plan on ASEAN Connectivity 2025 (2016)Google Scholar
ASEAN and the EU Through the Years, in 6/2016 ASEAN Focus 12 (2016)Google Scholar
ASEAN Business Advisory Council & EU-ASEAN Business Council, Non-Tariff Barriers (NTBs) in ASEAN and Their Elimination from a Business Perspective (2019)Google Scholar
ASEAN Comprehensive Investment Agreement: A Guidebook for Businesses & Investors (2d 2015)Google Scholar
ASEAN Framework for Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (2011)Google Scholar
ASEAN Historical Timeline, in 50 Years of ASEAN and Singapore (Tommy Koh et al. eds. 2017)Google Scholar
ASEAN-EU Vision Group, Report of the ASEAN-EU Vision Group: Transregional Partnership for Shared and Sustainable Prosperity (2006)Google Scholar
ASEAN Secretariat, A Historic Milestone for FDI and MNEs in ASEAN (2017)Google Scholar
ASEAN Secretariat, ASEAN Integration Report 2019 (2019)Google Scholar
ASEAN Secretariat, ASEAN Key Figures 2020 (2020)Google Scholar
ASEAN Secretariat & World Bank, ASEAN Integration Monitoring Report (2013)Google Scholar
ASEAN & UNCTAD, ASEAN Investment Report 2019: FDI in Services: Focus on Health Care (2019)Google Scholar
ASEAN +3 Macroeconomic Research Office, Theme: ASEAN+3 Region 20 Years after the Asian Financial Crisis, ASEAN+3 Regional Economic Outlook 2017 (2017)Google Scholar
Asian Development Bank, Asia 2050: Realizing the Asian Century: Executive Summary (2011)Google Scholar
Asian Development Bank, Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement: Overview and Economic Impact, ADB Brief, No. 164 (2020)Google Scholar
Asian Development Bank Institute, ASEAN 2030: Toward a Borderless Economic Community 201 (2014)Google Scholar
Asian Trade Centre, Ten Benefits of the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) (2018)Google Scholar
Aspirations, Opportunities and Challenges in 2015 and Beyond, IOM-MPI Issues in Brief, No. 11 (2014)Google Scholar
Australia Government, 2017 Foreign Policy White Paper (2017)Google Scholar
Bayhaqi, Akhmad et al., Trade Facilitation in APEC: Progress and Impact, APEC PSU Policy Brief No. 25 (2019)Google Scholar
Best Practices for RTAs/FTAs in APEC (2004)Google Scholar
Boustany, Charles W. Jr. & Freidberg, Aaron L., Answering China’s Economic Challenge: Preserving Power, Enhancing Prosperity, NBR Report, No. 76 (2019)Google Scholar
Centre for Economics and Business Research, World Economic League Table 2021 (2020)Google Scholar
Chanlett-Avery, Emma et al., Thailand: Background and U.S. Relations, CRS Report (2015)Google Scholar
Cimino-Isaacs, Cathleen D., Labor Enforcement Issues in U.S. FTAs, CRS: In Focus (2000)Google Scholar
Clifford Chance, The EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement: A Different Kind of Treaty? (2018)Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities, A New Partnership with South East Asia, COM(2003) 399 final (2003)Google Scholar
Commissions of the European Communities, Communication from the Commission: A New Partnership with South East Asia, COM (2003) 399 final (2003)Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities, Creating a New Dynamic in EU-ASEAN Relations, COM(96) 314 final (1996)Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities, Europe and Asia: A Strategic Framework for Enhanced Partnerships, COM(2001) 469 final (2001)Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities, Report on the State of Play of the FTA Negotiations with ASEAN, India, the Andean Community and Central America, SEC(2009) 681 final (2009)Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities, Towards a New Asia Strategy, COM(94) 314 final (1994)Google Scholar
Committee on Trade and Investment (CTI) Chair, The Individual Action Plan (IAP) and IAP Peer Review, 2011/SOM2/021anx2 (2011)Google Scholar
Communication from Chile and the Republic of Korea, Best Practices for FTAs/FTAs in APEC, TN/RL/W/187, Sept. 12, 2005Google Scholar
Concept Paper for the Expansion of the ITA, Communication from Canada, Japan, Korea, the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu, Singapore and the United States, G/IT/W/36, May 2, 2012Google Scholar
Coper, William H., The EU-South Korea Free Trade Agreement and Its Implications for the United States, CRS Report (2011)Google Scholar
CPTPP Statement on the Occasion of the Third Commission Meeting (2020)Google Scholar
Chair, CTI, Annex 2 – APEC Cross-Border E-Commerce Facilitation Framework, 2017/SOM3/027anx02 (2017)Google Scholar
Chair, CTI, Annex 4 – The Conduct of the Trade Policy Dialogue on WTO-Plus Elements of RTAs/FTAs and the Trade Policy Dialogue Outcomes Report, 2017/SOM2/018anx04 (2017)Google Scholar
Chair, CTI, The Individual Action Plan (IAP) and IAP Peer Review, 2011/SOM2/021anx2, May 17–18, 2011Google Scholar
CTI Report to Ministers, Collective Strategic Study on Issues Related to the Realization of the FTAAP (2016)Google Scholar
Delegation of the European Union to Vietnam, Guide to the EU-Vietnam Trade and Investment Agreements (2016)Google Scholar
Department of Defense, Indo-Pacific Strategy Report: Preparedness, Partnerships, and Promoting a Networked Region (2019)Google Scholar
Department of State, A Free and Open Indo-Pacific Advancing a Shared Vision (2019)Google Scholar
DFAT, CPTPP Suspensions Explained (2019)Google Scholar
DFAT, Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership: Outcomes: Services and Investment (2020)Google Scholar
DFDL, Investment Guide: Vietnam 2020 (7th ed. 2020)Google Scholar
Dominican Republic-Central America FTA, Arbitral Panel Established Pursuant to Chapter Twenty, In the Matter of Guatemala – Issues Relating to the Obligations Under Article 16.2.1(a) of the CAFTA-DR, Final Report of the Panel (2017)Google Scholar
EU Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Geographical Indications in the ASEAN Region: A Booklet on ASEAN Geographical Indications Procedure and Products (2019)Google Scholar
EU-ASEAN Business Council, 2020 EU-ASEAN Sentiment Survey (2020)Google Scholar
European Chamber of Commerce in Vietnam (EuroCham), 2019 EVFTA Report: The EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement: Perspectives from Vietnam (2019)Google Scholar
European Commission, Cambodia Loses Duty-Free Access to the EU Market over Human Rights Concerns (2020)Google Scholar
European Commission, Client and Supplier Countries of the EU 27 in Merchandise Trade (Value %) (2019, Excluding Intra-EU Trade) (2019)Google Scholar
European Commission, Consultation Strategy: Impact Assessment on the Establishment of a Multilateral Investment Court for Investment Dispute Resolution (2016)Google Scholar
European Commission, Europe’s Moment: Repair and Prepare for the Next Generation, COM(2020) 456 final (2020)Google Scholar
European Commission, EU-China Geographical Indications (2020)Google Scholar
European Commission, EU-Mercosur Trade Agreement: Building Bridges for Trade and Sustainable Development (2019)Google Scholar
European Commission, EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement: A New Relationship, with Big Changes (2020)Google Scholar
European Commission, EU-Vietnam Trade Agreement Enters into Force (2020)Google Scholar
European Commission, Factsheet : A New EU Agreement with Japan (2018)Google Scholar
European Commission, Global Europe: Competing in the World (2006)Google Scholar
European Commission, Human Rights and Sustainable Development in the EU-Vietnam Relations with Specific Regard to the EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement (2016)Google Scholar
European Commission, Key Elements of the EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (2020)Google Scholar
European Commission, Overview of FTA and Other Trade Negotiations (Updated Aug. 2020)Google Scholar
European Commission, Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Implementation of Free Trade Agreements: 1 January 2016 – 31 December 2016, COM(2017) 654 final (2017)Google Scholar
European Commission, Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Report on the Implementation of the Trade Policy Strategy Trade for All: Delivering a Progressive Trade Policy to Harness Globalisation, COM (2017) 491 final (2017)Google Scholar
European Commission, State of the Union Address 2020 (2020)Google Scholar
European Commission, Trade for All: Towards a More Responsible Trade and Investment Policy (2015)Google Scholar
European Commission, Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA): Factsheet (2016)Google Scholar
European Commission, 2020 Strategic Foresight Report (2020)Google Scholar
European Commission & High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, EU-China – Strategic Outlook, Joint (2019) 5 final (2019)Google Scholar
European Ombudsman, Decision in Case 1409/2014/MHZ on the European Commission’s Failure to Carry Out a Prior Human Rights Impact Assessment of the EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement (2016)Google Scholar
European Parliament, CJEU Opinion on the EU-Singapore Agreement (2017)Google Scholar
European Parliament, Driving Trade in the ASEAN Region: Progress of FTA Negotiations (2016)Google Scholar
European Parliament, European Parliament Resolution on Regional Free Trade Areas and Trade Strategy in the European Union (2002/2044(INI)), P5_TA(2003)0237 (2003)Google Scholar
European Parliament, European Parliament Resolution of 25 November 2010 on Human Rights and Social and Environmental Standards in International Trade Agreements, P7(2010)0434 (2010)Google Scholar
European Parliament, European Parliament Resolution of 17 April 2014 on the State of Play of the EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement, P7_TA(2014)0458 (2014)Google Scholar
European Parliament, European Parliament Resolution of 7 October 2020 on the Implementation of the Common Commercial Policy – Annual Report 2018, P9_TA-PROV(2020)0252 (2020)Google Scholar
European Parliament, EU-Singapore Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (Resolution), P8-TA(2019)0093 (2019)Google Scholar
European Parliament, Factsheet on the European Union: The Treaty of Lisbon (2020)Google Scholar
European Parliament, Free Trade Agreement between the EU and the Republic of Singapore – Analysis (2018)Google Scholar
European Parliament, Human Rights in EU Trade Agreements: The Human Rights Clause and its Application (2019)Google Scholar
European Parliament, Legislative Train 09.2020 (2020)Google Scholar
European Parliament, Resolution on the Situation in South-East Asia, A3-0219/91 (1991)Google Scholar
European Parliament, Southeast Asia, Fact Sheets on the European Union (2020)Google Scholar
European Parliament, The Generalised Scheme of Preferences Regulation (No 978/2012): European Implementation Assessment (2018)Google Scholar
European Services Forum, Letter to the Commissioner for Trade, 12 July 2020Google Scholar
Evaluation Unit et al., Evaluation of EC Co-Cooperation with ASEAN: Final Report, vol. 2 (2009)Google Scholar
EU, EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement Enters into Force as of 1 August 2020 (2020)Google Scholar
FDI in Services: Focus on Health Care (2019)Google Scholar
Fergusson, Ian F. & Williams, Brock R., The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP): Key Provisions and Issues for Congress, CRS Report (2016)Google Scholar
Fergusson, Ian F. & Vaughn, Bruce, The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, CRS Report (2011)Google Scholar
Foreword by Singapore Minister for Communications & Information and Minister-in-Charge of Trade Relations S Iswaran, in European Commission & MTI, European Union – Singapore Trade and Investment Agreements (2019)Google Scholar
General Council Decision, TRIPS Non-Violation and Situation Complaints Moratorium, WT/L/1080, Dec. 1, 2019Google Scholar
Gloudeman, Lauren & Salidjanova, Nargiza, Policy Considerations for Negotiating a U.S.-China Bilateral Investment Treaty, U.S. China Economic and Security Review Commission Staff Research Report (2016)Google Scholar
Google et al., SEA Internet Economy Report 2019 (2019)Google Scholar
Green, Michael et al., Powers, Norms, and Institutions: The Future of the Indo-Pacific from a Southeast Asia Perspective, Results of a CSIS Survey of Strategic Elites (2020)Google Scholar
Guiding Principles and Objectives for Negotiating the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (2012)Google Scholar
Hsu, Locknie et al., Improving Connectivity between ASEAN’s Legal Systems to Address Commercial Issues (2018)Google Scholar
Hurley, John, Examining the Debt Implications of the Belt and Road Initiative from a Policy Perspective, CGD Policy Paper (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISEAS-Yusof Ishal Institute, The State of Southeast Asia: 2020 Survey Report (2002)Google Scholar
Joint Leaders’ Statement on the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) (2019)Google Scholar
Joint Local Statement on the Death Penalty Case of Moad Fadzir bin Mustaffa in Singapore (2020)Google Scholar
Kuriyama, Carlos & Ogazon, Azul, Expanding the Information Technology Agreement, APEC PSU Brief No. 6 (2013)Google Scholar
Letter from María L. Pagán, Acting United States Trade Representative, to the Trans-Pacific Partnership Depositary, Jan. 30, 2017Google Scholar
Martin, Michael F., The Proposed U.S. Malaysia Free Trade Agreement, CRS Report (2008)Google Scholar
Martin, Michael F., U.S. Restrictions on Relations with Burma, CRS Report (2020)Google Scholar
Martin, Michael F., U.S.-Vietnam Economic and Trade Relations: Issues in 2019, CRS: In Focus (2019)Google Scholar
Mckinsey Global Institute, Digital Globalization: The New Era of Global Flows (2016)Google Scholar
Meltzer, Joshua P. and Neena Shenai, The US-China Economic Relationship: A Comprehensive Approach, Brookings Policy Brief (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Trade and Trade Industry Singapore, Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Signed (2020)Google Scholar
MTI, A Guide to Understanding the ASEAN-China Free Trade Area Upgrade (2016)Google Scholar
Murrill, Brandon J., The WTO’s Appellate Body Loses Its Quorum: Is This the Beginning of the End for the “Rules-Based Trading System”? CRS Legal Sidebar (2019)Google Scholar
New Zealand Foreign Affairs & Trade, Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership: National Interest Analysis (2020)Google Scholar
New Zealand’s CPTPP Investor-State Dispute Settlement Side Letters with Australia, Brunei, Malaysia, Peru and Vietnam (2018)Google Scholar
Office of the Secretary of State, The Elements of the China Challenge (2020)Google Scholar
Office of the Spokesperson, U.S. 2019 APEC Outcomes, Dec. 19, 2019Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Leveraging Digital Trade to Fight the Consequences of COVID-19 (2020)Google Scholar
Outline of the RCEP Agreement (as at November 2017), in Joint Leaders’ Statement on the Negotiations for the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) (2017)Google Scholar
Possible reform of Investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS): Comments by the Government of Indonesia: Note by the Secretariat, A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.156, Nov. 9, 2018Google Scholar
Post-Cabinet Press Conference: Monday, Oct. 31, 2017 (2017)Google Scholar
Presence of Natural Persons (Mode 4), S/C/W/301, Sept. 15, 2009Google Scholar
President of the United States, National Security Strategy of the United States of America (2017)Google Scholar
PWC, The Long View: How Will the Global Economic Order Change by 2050? (2017)Google Scholar
Rana, Pradumna B & Xianbai, Ji, BRI’s “Debt Trap Diplomacy,” RISI Commentary, No. 191 (2020)Google Scholar
RCEP: A Guide to the World’s Largest Trade Agreement, Asia House Advisory Briefing (2020)Google Scholar
Report of the East Asian Vision Group II (EAVGII) (2012)Google Scholar
Resolution of the Sixth AIPO General Assembly on ASEAN-EC Economic Cooperation, 6 GA/RES.11/83 (1983)Google Scholar
Res, S.. 311 (111th Congress) (2009)Google Scholar
Res, S.. 218 (112th Congress) (2011)Google Scholar
Sajjanhar, Ashok, Taking Stock of India’s “Act East Policy, ORF Issue Brief, No. 142 (2016)Google Scholar
Schnepf, Randy, WTO Doha Round: Implications for U.S. Agriculture, CRS Report (2014)Google Scholar
Sharma, Sachin Kumar et al., A Quantitative Assessment of India’s Withdrawal from RCEP: Issues and Concerns (2020)Google Scholar
Singapore Customs, Application Procedures for a Certificate of Origin via TradeNet and Related Administrative Matters (2020)Google Scholar
Singapore International Chamber of Commerce, Plain English Guide to the European Union-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (2020)Google Scholar
Singapore International Commercial Court Users Guide (2019)Google Scholar
Singapore International Dispute Resolution Academy, SIDRA International Dispute Resolution Survey: 2020 Final Report (2020)Google Scholar
Spak, Gregory et al., Overview of Chapter 4 (Rules of Origin) of the US-Mexico-Canada Trade Agreement (2018)Google Scholar
Special Issue: UNCITRAL and Investment Arbitration Reform: Matching Concerns and Solutions (Malcolm Langford et al. eds.) in 21: 2–3J. World Invest. & Trade (2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Specialist in Asian Affairs & Specialist in International Trade and Finance, Vietnam PNTR Status and WTO Accession Issues and Implications for the United States, CRS Report (2007)Google Scholar
Statement by the President on the Signing of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (2016)Google Scholar
State Council, 国务院关于加快实施自由贸易区战略的若干意见 [Several Opinions of the State Council on Accelerating the Implementation of the Strategies for Free Trade Areas] (2015)Google Scholar
Sugiyarto, Guntur & Agunias, Dovelyn Rannveig, A “Freer” Flow of Skilled Labour within ASEAN: Aspirations, Opportunities and Challenges in 2015 and Beyond, IOM-MPI Issues in Brief, No. 11 (2014)Google Scholar
Summary of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (2020)Google Scholar
Summary Report of Competition Policy and Law Group Meeting 2012, 2013/SOM1.CPLG/002 (2013)Google Scholar
Sustainable Development Goals, in United Nations General Assembly, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, A/Res/70/1 (2015), goal 9.1Google Scholar
The European Community and ASEAN, in Europe Information: External Relations, 16/79 (1979)Google Scholar
Trans-Pacific Partnership Leaders Statement (2015)Google Scholar
UNCTAD, ASEAN at 50: Achievements and Challenges in Regional Integration (2017)Google Scholar
UNCTAD, International Classification on Non-Tariff Measures (2019)Google Scholar
UNCTAD, Investment Trends Monitor (2021)Google Scholar
UNCTAD, Non-tariff Measures: Evidence from Selected Developing Countries and Future Research Agenda: Developing Countries in International Trade Studies (2010)Google Scholar
UNCTAD, RCEP Agreement as a Potential Boost for Investment in Sustainable Post-COVID Recovery, Investment Trends Monitor (2020)Google Scholar
UNCTAD, The Asian Developmental State and the Flying Geese Paradigm, No. 213 (2013)Google Scholar
UNCTAD, World Investment Report 2019 (2019)Google Scholar
UNCTAD, World Investment Report 2020 (2020)Google Scholar
UNCTAD Secretariat, Core Elements of International Investment Agreements in Domestic Investment Frameworks in the APEC Region (2011)Google Scholar
UNESCAP, Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Report 2016: Recent Trends and Development (2016)Google Scholar
UNESCAP, Complementarities between the ASEAN Community Vision 2025 and the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: A Framework for Action (2017)Google Scholar
UNESCAP & UNCTAD, Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Report 2019: Navigating Non-tariff Measures towards Sustainable Development (2019)Google Scholar
United Nations, South-South Trade in Asia: The Role of Regional Trade Agreements (2008)Google Scholar
U.S. Chamber of Commerce, The Next Stage of US-Vietnam Relations: A Blueprint to Deepen Trade and Investment Ties (2019)Google Scholar
USITC, The Pros and Cons of Entering Into Negotiations on Free Trade Area Agreements with Taiwan, the Republic of Korea, and ASEAN, or the Pacific Rim Region in General: Reports to the Senate Committee on Finance on Investigation No. TA-332–259 under Section 332 of the Tariff Act of 1930, USITC Publications 2166 (1989)Google Scholar
USTR, Fact Sheet: Economic and Trade Agreement between the United States of America and the People’s Republic of China (2000)Google Scholar
USTR, National Trade Policy for 2017 (2017)Google Scholar
USTR, United States-Japan Trade Agreement (USJTA) Negotiations: Summary of Specific Negotiating Objectives (2018)Google Scholar
Vaughn, Bruce, U.S. Strategic and Defense Relationship in the Asia-Pacific Region, CRS Report (2007)Google Scholar
Vietnam Ministry of Industry and Trade, Vietnamese-German Cooperation Research Projects on Wind Power (2017)Google Scholar
White House, Interim National Security Strategic Guidance (2021)Google Scholar
Williams, Brock R. & Cook, Nicolas, The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), CRS: In Focus (2020)Google Scholar
Woodhead, Geoffrey, The Role of Peer Reviews in APEC, First OECD-South East Asia Regional Forum: Peer Review Mechanisms – Macroeconomic Policies, Regional Economic Integration and Economic Development (2007)Google Scholar
World Bank, Vietnam: Deepening International Integration and Implementing the EVFTA (2020)Google Scholar
WTO Appellate Body Report, Mexico – Tax Measures on Soft Drinks and Other Beverages, WT/DS308/AB/R (2006)Google Scholar
WTO Appellate Body Report, Peru – Additional Duty on Imports of Certain Agricultural Products, WT/DS457/AB/R (2015)Google Scholar
WTO, Background Note by Secretariat, Council for Trade in Services: Mode 3 – Commercial Presence, S/C/W/314 (2010)Google Scholar
WTO, DS590: Japan – Measures Related to the Exportation of Products and Technology to KoreaGoogle Scholar
WTO, European Union – Certain Measures concerning Palm Oil and Oil Palm Crop-based Biofuels, WT/DS593/1, G/L/1348, G/TBTB/D/52, G/SCM/D128/1 (2019)Google Scholar
WTO, Mode 3 – Commercial Presence, S/C/W/314, Apr. 7, 2010Google Scholar
WTO, Panel Report, European Communities and Its Member States – Tariff Treatment of Certain Information Technology Products, WT/DS375/R, WT/DS376/R, WT/DS377/R, Aug. 16, 2010 (EC-IT Products)Google Scholar
WTO, Panel Report, Russia – Measures Concerning Traffic in Transit, WT/DS512/R (2019)Google Scholar
WTO, Panel Report, United States – Tariff Measures on Certain Goods from China, WT/DS543/R (2020)Google Scholar
WTO, Request for Consultations by Hong Kong, China, United States – Origin Marking Requirement, WT/DS597/1, G/L1365, G/RO/D/8, G/TBTGoogle Scholar
WTO, Trade in Medical Goods in the Context of Tackling COVID-19 (2020)Google Scholar
WTO, Trade in Services in the Context of COVID-19 (2020)Google Scholar
WTO, Trade Policy Review, Japan: Minutes of the Meeting: Addendum, WT/TPR/M/397/Add.1 (2020)Google Scholar
WTO, Trade Policy Review, Report by India, WT/TPR/G403 (2020)Google Scholar
WTO, Trade Policy Review: Report by the Secretariat: European Union, WT/TPR/S/395 (2019)Google Scholar
WTO, Trade Policy Review, Report by the Secretariat: The Philippines, WT/TPR/S/368 (2018)Google Scholar
WTO, Trade Policy Review, Report by the Secretariat, Singapore, WT/TPR.S.343 (2016)Google Scholar
WTO, World Trade Report 2011: The WTO and Preferential Trade Agreements: From Co-existence to Coherence (2011)Google Scholar
WTO, World Trade Report 2015 (2015)Google Scholar
WTO, World Trade Report 2019: The Future of Services Trade (2019)Google Scholar
WTO, World Trade Statistical Review 2019 (2019)Google Scholar
WTO, World Trade Statistics Review 2020 (2020)Google Scholar
WTO, 15 Years of the Information Technology Agreement: Trade, Innovation and Global Production Networks (2012)Google Scholar
WTO, 20 Years of the Information Technology Agreement: Boosting Trade, Innovation and Digital Connectivity (2017)Google Scholar