Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5d6d958fb5-27v8q Total loading time: 0.866 Render date: 2022-11-28T15:21:48.985Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Part I - Process: NAFTA and NAAEC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2015

Hoi L. Kong
Affiliation:
McGill University, Faculty of Law
L. Kinvin Wroth
Affiliation:
Vermont Law School
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
NAFTA and Sustainable Development
History, Experience, and Prospects for Reform
, pp. 13 - 146
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Almaty Guidelines on Promoting the Application of the Principles of the Aarhus Convention in International Forums, May 27, 2005, Decision II/4 of MOP, doc. ECE/MP.PP/2005/2/Add.5
Central America-Dominican Republic-United States Free Trade Agreement, August 5, 2004, ch. 17.
Commission of the European Communities, “Commission Communication to the European Parliament and the European Ombudsman on Relations with the Complainant in Respect of Infringements of Community Law,” Brussels, March 20, 2002, 141 at 4.
Convention on International Civil Aviation, December 7, 1944, 15 UNTS 295. 2000 revision is available online: <www.icao.int/icaonet/dcs/1300.html>.
EC Treaty (Treaty of Rome), European (Economic) Community, March 25, 1957. (Entered into force January 1, 1958.)
European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour, European Communities, September 6, 2001.
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, IBRD 93–10, Resolution No. IDA 96–6, “The Inspection Panel,” September 22, 1993, online: <www.inspectionpanel.org>.
North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation, September 14, 1993, 32 I.L.M. 1480. (Entered into force January 1, 1994.)
Session of the ICAO Council. Review of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) relating to the conduct of safety oversight audits under the comprehensive systems approach, 179th Sess., 12th Mtg., Subject No. 14.5: Safety Oversight, ICAO Doc. C-MIN 179/12 (2006) §49.
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, May 22, 1969, 155 U.N.T.S. 331.
World Bank Inspection Panel, Operating Procedures (1994). Online: WB <http://www.worldbank.org/inspectionpanel>.

Secondary Sources

Buergenthal, Thomas. Law-Making in the International Civil Aviation Organization. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press. 1969.Google Scholar
Craig, Paul P. EU Administrative Law. New York: Oxford University Press. 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupuy, Pierre-Marie and Vierucci, Luisa. NGO's in International Law, Efficiency in Flexibility? Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. 2008.Google Scholar
French, Duncan and Saul, Matthew. International Law and Dispute Settlement. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing. 2010.Google Scholar
Grossman, Gene, and Krueger, Alan. “Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement,” in The US – Mexico Free Trade Agreement. Ed. Garber, Peter. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1993.Google Scholar
Henderson, Conway W. Understanding International Law. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell Publication. 2010.Google Scholar
Kirton, John J. and Trebilcock, Michael J.. Hard Choices, Soft Law: Voluntary Standards in Global Trade, Environment and Social Governance. Aldershot, England: Ashgate Publishing. 2004.Google Scholar
Flood, Colleen and Sossin, Lorne. Administrative Law in Context: A New Casebook. Emond-Montgomery Publishing. 2008.Google Scholar
Antweiler, Werner, et al.Is Free Trade Good for the Environment.” (2001) 91 4 The American Economic Review 877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridgeman, Natalie. “World Bank Reform in the ‘Post-Policy’ Era.” (2001) 13 Geo Int'l Envtl L Rev 1013.Google Scholar
Casey-Lefkowitz, Susan, Futrell, William J., Austin, Jay, and Bass, Susan. “The Evolving Role of Citizens in Environmental Enforcement.” Paper delivered at the Fourth International Conference on Environmental Compliance and Enforcement in Chiang Mai, Thailand, April 22, 1996, unpublished.
Currie, Duncan. “United States Unilateralism and the Kyoto Protocol, CTBT and ABM Treaties: The Implications Under International Law.” Greenpeace publication (R. v Bush), June 9, 2001. <http://archive.greenpeace.org/climate/climatecountdown/legalsum.htm>.
Clark, Dana L.The World Bank and Human Rights: The Need for Greater Accountability.” (2002) 15 Harv Hum Rts J 218.Google Scholar
DiMento, Joseph F. & Doughman, Pamela M.. “Soft Teeth in the Back of the Mouth: the NAFTA Environmental Side Agreement Implemented.” (1998) 10 Geo Int'l Envtl L Rev 651, 658–81.Google Scholar
Garver, Geoff. “Tooth Decay: Examining NAFTA's ‘Environmental Teeth.’” (2008) 25(3) The Environmental Forum 3439.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, Mark R.The Role of Transparency and Public Participation in International Environmental Agreements: The North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation.” (2001–2002) 29 Environmental Affairs L Rev 343398.Google Scholar
Harlow, Carol. “Global Administrative Law: The Quest for Principles and Values.” (2006) 17(1) Eur J Int Law 187214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, John H.A New Approach to Compliance with International Environmental Law: The Submissions Procedure of the NAFTA Environmental Commission.” (2001) 28 Ecology LQ.Google Scholar
Knox, John H.Separated at Birth: The North American Agreements on Labor and the Environment.” (2004) 26 Loy LA Int'l & Comp LJ at 359387.Google Scholar
Lewis, Bradley N.Biting Without Teeth: The Citizen Submission Process and Environmental Protection.” (2007) 155 U Penn LR 12291268.Google Scholar
Markell, David L. “Governance of International Institutions: A Review of North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation's Citizen Submissions Process.” (2005) 30 NCJ Int'l L & Com Reg at 759794.Google Scholar
Markell, David L.The Role of Spotlighting Procedures in Promoting Citizen Participation, Transparency, and Accountability.” (2010) 45 Wake Forest L Rev 425467.Google Scholar
Markell, David L. and Tyler, Tom R.. “Using Empirical Research to Design Government Citizen Participation Process: A Case Study of Citizens’ Roles in Environmental Compliance and Enforcement.” (2008) 57 Kan L Rev 1.Google Scholar
Markell, David L.The Commission for Environmental Cooperation's Citizen Submission Process.” (1999) 12 Geo Int'l Envtl L Rev at 545574.Google Scholar
Markell, David L.Understanding Citizen Perspectives on Government Decision Makin Processes as a Way to Improve the Administrative State.” (2006) 36 Environmental Law 683.Google Scholar
Martinsen, Dorte Sindbjerg and Jørgensen, Torben Beck. “Accountability as a Differentiated Value in Supranational Governance.” (2010) 40(6) The American Review of Public Administration 742760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wold, Chris. “Evaluating NAFTA and the Commission for Environmental Cooperation: Lessons for Integrating Trade and Environment in Free Trade Agreements.” (2008) 28 St Louis U Pub L Rev 201252.Google Scholar
Yang, Tseming. “The Effectiveness of the NAFTA Environmental Side Agreement's Citizen Submission Process: A Cast Study of Metales y Derivados.” (2005) 76(2) U Colo L Rev 443502.Google Scholar
Annan, S-G Kofi. “Address to the World Summit on Sustainable Development.” Secretary-General address delivered at the World Summit on Sustainable Development, Johannesburg, September 2, 2002, unpublished, <http://www.un.org/events/wssd/statements/sgE.htm>.
Clinton, Presidential Candidate Gov. Bill “Address.” Address delivered at University of North Carolina, October 4, 1992, unpublished.
Graham, Hon. Bill. “Notes For An Address by the Honourable Bill Graham, Minister of Foreign Affairs.” Address delivered at the United Nations Conference on Disarmament, Geneva, March 19, 2002, unpublished, <http://webapps.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/minpub/Publication.asp?publication_id=380961>.
CEC, Joint Pub. Advisory Comm., Advice to Council No: 08–01: Submissions on Enforcement Matters: From Lessons Learned to Following Up Factual Records (Feb. 27, 2008). Available at: http://www.cec.org/files/pdf/ABOUTUS/JPACAdvice-0801_SEM_en.pdf.
CEC, Joint Pub. Advisory Comm., Advice to Council No: 12–01: Re: SEM Task Force Proposals for Changes to the Guidelines for Submissions on Enforcement Matters (SEM) (May 23, 2012). Available at: http://www.cec.org/Storage/137/16238_JPAC_Advice_12-01-Final-en.pdf.
Four-Year review of the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation: Report of the independent Review Committee (June 1998), p. 5.
Gardner, Jane. “Emerging Conflict of Interest” JPAC Discussion Paper: Analysis Articles 14 and 15 of the NAAEC Council's (April 28, 2004), unpublished.
Opalka, Katia. “Inside the NAFTA Environmental Commission.” (2010) White Paper, unpublished.
Commission for Environmental Cooperation. Guidelines for Submissions on Enforcement Matters under Articles 14 and 15 of the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation. Montreal: Commission for Environmental Cooperation. 2013. http://www.cec.org/Storage/152/17779_SEM_booklet_PDF_en_final.pdf.
Environmental Affairs Council. Working Procedures for Submissions on Environmental Law Enforcement Matters under Chapter 17 of the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement. Environmental Affairs Council, 2010. http://www.saa-sem.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=52&Itemid=208&lang=us.
Case concerning Kasikili/Sedudu Island (Botswana v Namibia) [1999] ICJ Rep 1045.
Case concerning the Territorial Dispute (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v Chad), [1994] ICJ Rep 6.
North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation, September 14, 1993, in force January 1, 1994, (1993) 32 ILM 1480; Can TS 1994 No 3.
Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with respect to Activities in the Area, Advisory Opinion (February 1, 2011).
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Vienna, May 23, 1969, in force January 27, 1980, 1155 UNTS 331; (1969) 8 ILM 679.
Commission for Environmental Cooperation, Bringing the Facts to Light: A Guide to Articles 14 and 15 of the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (Montreal: Commission for Environmental Cooperation, 2000).
Commission for Environmental Cooperation, Guidelines for Submissions on Enforcement Matters under Articles 14 and 15 of the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (Montreal: Commission for Environmental Cooperation, 2013).
SEM-00–004 (BC Logging), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (July 27, 2001).
SEM-00–006 (Tarahumara), Council Resolution 03–04 pursuant to Article 15(2) (April 22, 2003).
SEM-00–006 (Tarahumara), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (August 29, 2002).
SEM-01–001 (Cytrar II), Council Resolution 02–13 pursuant to Article 15(2) (December 10, 2002).
SEM-01–001 (Cytrar II), Determination pursuant to Article 14(3) (June 13, 2001).
SEM-01–001 (Cytrar II), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (July 29, 2002).
SEM-02–003 (Pulp and Paper), Council Resolution 03–16 pursuant to Article 15(2) (December 11, 2003).
SEM-02–003 (Pulp and Paper), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (October 8, 2003).
SEM-02–004 (El Boludo Project), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (May 17, 2004).
SEM-03–003 (Lake Chapala II), Council Resolution 08–01 pursuant to Article 15(2) (May 30, 2008).
SEM-03–003 (Lake Chapala II), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (May 18, 2005).
SEM-04–005 (Coal-fired Power Plants), Government of the United States of America Supplemental Response pursuant to Article 14(3) (September 29, 2005).
SEM-04–005 (Coal-fired Power Plants), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (December 5, 2005).
SEM-05–001 (Crushed Gravel in Puerto Peñasco), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (October 24, 2005).
SEM-05–002 (Coronado Islands), Government of the United Mexican States Response pursuant to Article 14(3) (January 10, 2006).
SEM-05–002 (Coronado Islands), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (January 18, 2007).
SEM-06–003 and SEM-06–004 (Ex Hacienda El Hospital II and Ex Hacienda El Hospital III), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (May 12, 2008).
SEM-06–005 (Species at Risk), Council Resolution 10–05 pursuant to Article 15(2) (December 20, 2010).
SEM-06–005 (Species at Risk), Government of Canada Response pursuant to Article 14(3) (February 8, 2007).
SEM-06–006 (Los Remedios National Park), Government of the United Mexican States Supplemental Response pursuant to Article 21(1)(b) (February 26, 2008).
SEM-06–006 (Los Remedios National Park), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (March 20, 2008).
SEM-06–006 (Los Remedios National Park), Secretariat Information Request pursuant to Article 21(1)(b) (November 27, 2007).
SEM-07–001 (Minera San Xavier), Government of the United Mexican States Supplemental Response pursuant to Article 21(1)(b) (June 5, 2008).
SEM-07–001 (Minera San Xavier), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (July 15, 2009).
SEM-07–001 (Minera San Xavier), Secretariat Information Request pursuant to Article 21(1)(b) (March 7, 2008).
SEM-07–005 (Drilling Waste in Cunduacán), Determination pursuant to Article 14(3) (April 8, 2009).
SEM-07–005 (Drilling Waste in Cunduacán), Government of the United Mexican States Supplemental Response pursuant to Article 21(1)(b) (May 15, 2008).
SEM-08–001 (La Ciudadela Project), Government of the United Mexican States Supplemental Response pursuant to Article 21(1)(b) (May 26, 2010).
SEM-08–001 (La Ciudadela Project), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (August 12, 2010).
SEM-09–001 (Transgenic Maize in Chihuahua), Government of the United Mexican States Response pursuant to Article 14(3) (May 3, 2010).
SEM-09–001 (Transgenic Maize in Chihuahua), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (December 20, 2010).
SEM-09–002 (Wetlands in Manzanillo), Notification pursuant to Article 15(1) (August 19, 2013).
SEM-09–003 (Los Remedios National Park II), Government of the United Mexican States Response pursuant to Article 14(3) (December 20, 2010).
SEM-09–003 (Los Remedios National Park II), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (July 27, 2011).
SEM-95–001 (Spotted Owl), Submission pursuant to Article 14 (June 30, 1995).
SEM-96–003 (Oldman River I), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (April 2, 1997).
SEM-97–001 (B.C. Hydro), Council Resolution 98–07 pursuant to Article 15(2) (June 24, 1998).
SEM-97–001 (B.C. Hydro), Government of Canada Response pursuant to Article 14(3) (July 21, 1997).
SEM-97–001 (B.C. Hydro), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (April 27, 1998).
SEM-98–004 (BC Mining), Council Resolution 01–11 pursuant to Article 15(2) (November 16, 2001).
SEM-98–004 (BC Mining), Government of Canada Response pursuant to Article 14(3) (September 8, 1999).
SEM-98–004 (BC Mining), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (June 29, 1998).
SEM-98–005 (Aquanova), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (August 4, 2000).
SEM-98–005 (Cytrar I), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (October 26, 2000).
SEM-99–001 and SEM 00–002 (Methanex), Determination pursuant to Article 14(3) (June 30, 2000).
SEM-99–001 and SEM 00–002 (Methanex), Government of the United States of America Response pursuant to Article 14(3) (May 30, 2000).
Aust, Anthony. Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black's Law Dictionary Free Online Legal Dictionary, 2nd ed.
Markell, David. “The North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation After Ten Years: Lessons About Institutional Structure and Public Participation in Governance.” (2004) 26 Loyola of Los Angeles International & Comparative Law Review, 341–57.Google Scholar
Markell, David. “The Role of Spotlighting Procedures in Promoting Citizen Participation, Transparency, and Accountability.” (2010) 45 Wake Forest Law Review, 425–67.Google Scholar
Pacheco-Vega, Raúl. “Las denuncias ciudadanas sobre cumplimiento ambiental en América del Norte (1996–2012): perspectivas sobre la sociedad civil ambientalista norteamericana.” (2013) 8 NORTEAMÉRICA, 77108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solano, Pablo. “Choosing the Right Whistle: The Development of the ‘Environmental Law’ Concept under the Citizen Submission Process,” Chapter 3 of this volume.
Ten-year Review and Assessment Committee. “Ten Years of North American Environmental Cooperation.” Report of the Ten-year Review and Assessment Committee to the Council of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation (June 15, 2004).

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×