Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:19:47.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2020

Edited by
Francesco Pelosi  and
Federico M. Petrucci
Francesco Pelosi
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi, Pisa
Federico M. Petrucci
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Torino, Italy
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Music and Philosophy in the Roman Empire , pp. 303 - 326
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abert, H. 1899. Die Lehre vom Ethos in der griechischen Musik. Leipzig, Breitkopf & Härtel.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. 1991. ‘Epicurean poetics’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 7: 63–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubry, G. 2007. Dieu sans la puissance. Dunamis et energeia chez Aristote et Plotin. Paris, Vrin.Google Scholar
Babut, D. 1969. Plutarque. De la vertu éthique. Introduction, texte, traduction et commentaire. Paris, Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Bakhouche, B. (ed.) 1997. ‘Musique et philosophie: le De Institutione Musica de Boèce dans la tradition encyclopédique latine’, Bulletin de l’Association Guillame Budé 3: 210–32.Google Scholar
Bakhouche, B. 2011. Calcidius. Commentaire au Timée de Platon. Paris, Vrin.Google Scholar
Baltes, M. 1976. Die Weltentstehung des platonischen Timaios nach den antiken Interpreten I. Leiden-Boston, Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltes, M., and D’Ancona Costa, C. 2005. ‘Plotino, L’immortalità dell’anima IV. 7 (2) 84’, in Chiaradonna, R. (ed.), Studi sull’anima in Plotino. Naples, Bibliopolis, 19–58.Google Scholar
Baltzly, D. 2009. Proclus, Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus, vol. IV, bk. 3, pt. 2. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barbera, A. 1991. The Euclidean division of the canon. Greek and Latin sources. Lincoln and London, University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Barker, A. 1978. ‘Music and perception: a study in Aristoxenus’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 98: 9–16.Google Scholar
Barker, A. 1984. Greek Musical Writings. Volume I: The musician and his art. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barker, A. 1989. Greek Musical Writings. Volume II: Harmonic and acoustic theory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barker, A. 2000a. Scientific method in Ptolemy’s Harmonics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barker, A. 2000b. ‘Timaeus on music and the liver’, in Wright, M. R. (ed.), Reason and necessity. Essays on Plato’s Timaeus. London-Swansea, Duckworth and The Classical Press of Wales, 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, A. 2001. ‘Diogenes of Babylon and Hellenistic musical theory’, in Auvray-Assayas, C. and Delattre, D. (eds.), Cicéron et Philodème: la polémique en philosophie. Paris, Éditions Rue d’Ulm, 353–70.Google Scholar
Barker, A. 2007. The science of harmonics in Classical Greece. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, A. 2009. ‘Shifting conceptions of “schools” of harmonic theory, 400 BC–200 AD’, in Martinelli (ed.), 165–90.Google Scholar
Barker, A. 2014. Ancient Greek writers on their musical past. Studies in Greek musical historiography. Pisa-Rome, Fabrizio Serra Editore.Google Scholar
Barker, A. 2015. Porphyry’s Commentary on Ptolemy’s Harmonics. A Greek text and annotated translation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barker, A. 2016. ‘Plutarch, Quaestiones convivales, 704c4-705b6: the host and the musician’, in Bravi, L., Lomiento, L., Meriani, A., and Pace, G. (eds.), Tra lyra e aulos. Tradizioni musicali e generi poetici. Pisa-Rome, Fabrizio Serra Editore, 15–28.Google Scholar
Barker, A. 2018. ‘Disreputable music: a performance, a defence, and their intertextual and intermedial resonances (Plutarch Quaest. conv. 704c4-705b6)’, in Phillips, T. and D’Angour, A. (eds.), Music, text, and culture in ancient Greece. Oxford University Press, 233–55.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1988. ‘Scepticism and the arts’, Apeiron 21/2: 53–77.Google Scholar
Behr, J. (ed.) 2017. Origen. On first principles, 2 vols. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bélis, A. 1986. Aristoxène de Tarente et Aristote. Le traité d’harmonique. Paris, Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, Th. 2003. ‘Logos et scala naturae dans le stoïcisme de Zénon et Cléanthe’, Elenchos 23: 297–331.Google Scholar
Benveniste, É. 1966. ‘La notion de “rythme” dans son expression linguistique’, in Id. Problèmes de linguistique générale I. Paris, Gallimard, 327–35.Google Scholar
Bermond, C. 2001. La danza negli scritti di Filone, Clemente Alessandrino e Origene: storia e simbologia. Frankfurt am Main, Domus Editoria Europaea.Google Scholar
Bertier, J. 1978. Nicomaque de Gérase. Introduction arithmétique. Paris, Vrin.Google Scholar
Besnier, B. 2003. ‘La conception stoïcienne de la matière’, Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 37: 51–64.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. 2010. ‘What makes a myth εἰκώς? Remarks inspired by Myles Burnyeat’s εἰκὼς μῦθος’, in Mohr, R. D. and Sattler, B. M. (eds.), One book, the whole universe. Plato’s Timaeus today. Las Vegas-Zurich-Athens, Parmenides Publishing, 213–23.Google Scholar
Bett, R. 2006. ‘La double “schizophrénie” d’Adversus mathematicos I–VI, et son origine historique’, in J. Delattre (ed.), 17–34.Google Scholar
Bett, R. 2013. ‘A Sceptic looks at art (but not very closely): Sextus Empiricus on music’, International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 3: 155–81.Google Scholar
Bett, R. 2018. Sextus Empiricus, Against those in the disciplines. Translated with introduction and notes. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blank, D. L. 1998. Sextus Empiricus, Against the grammarians (Adversus mathematicos I). Translated with an introduction and commentary. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Blank, D. L. 2009. ‘Philosophia and technē: Epicureans on the arts’, in Warren, J. (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Epicureanism. Cambridge University Press, 216–33.Google Scholar
Blomqvist, J. 1974. ‘Die Skeptika des Sextus Empiricus’, Grazer Beiträge 2: 7–14.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. 2015. ‘Time: M 10.169-247’, in Algra, K. and Ierodiakonou, K. (eds.), Sextus Empiricus and ancient physics. Cambridge University Press, 275–323.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. 2003. Academici e Platonici. Il dibattito antico sullo scetticismo di Platone. Milan, LED.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. 2004. ‘Un lettore antico della Repubblica: Numenio di Apamea’, Méthexis 17: 71–84.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. 2007. ‘Eudorus’ psychology and Stoic ethics’, in Bonazzi, M. and Helmig, Ch. (eds.), Platonic Stoicism, Stoic Platonism. The dialogue between Platonism and Stoicism in Antiquity, Leuven University Press, 109–32.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. 2013. ‘Pythagoreanising Aristotle: Eudorus and the systematisation of Platonism’, in Schofield (ed.), 160–86.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. 2015. À la recherche des idées. Platonisme et philosophie hellénistique d’Antiochus à Plotin. Paris, Vrin.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2004. ‘Poetry and music in the life of Plutarch’s statesman’, in de Blois, L., Bons, J., Kessels, T., and Schenkeveld, D. M. (eds.), The statesman in Plutarch’s works. Vol. I. Leiden-Boston, Brill, 115–23.Google Scholar
Boyancé, P. 1946. ‘Les muses et l’harmonie des sphères’, in Mélanges dédies à la mémoire de Félix Grat I. Paris, Mme Pecqueur-Grat, 3–16.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. R. 2001. Post-Hellenistic philosophy. A study of its development from the Stoics to Origen, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. R. 2018. Platonist philosophy 80 BC to AD 250. An introduction and collection of sources in translation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brague, R. 1999. La sagesse du monde. Histoire de l’expérience humaine de l’univers. Paris, Fayard.Google Scholar
Brancacci, A. 1984. ‘Aristosseno e lo statuto epistemologico della scienza armonica’, in Giannantoni, G. and Vegetti, M. (eds.), La scienza ellenistica. Atti delle tre giornate di studio tenutesi a Pavia dal 14 al 16 aprile 1982. Naples, Bibliopolis, 151–86.Google Scholar
Brigham, F. 1962. ‘The concept of new song in Clement of Alexandria’s Exhortation to the Greeks’, Classical Folia 16/1: 9–13.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. (ed.) 2005. Porphyre, Sentences, 2 vols. Paris, Vrin.Google Scholar
Brochard, V. 2002. Les Sceptiques grecs. Paris, Le Livre de Poche (or. ed. Paris, Imprimerie Nationale, 1887).Google Scholar
Bruns, I. (ed.) 1887–92. Alexandri Aphrodisiensis praeter commentaria scripta minora, 2 vols. Berlin, Reimer.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. 1994a. ‘The conjunctive model’, in Id. Papers in Hellenistic philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 72–91.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. 1994b. ‘Sextus Empiricus on the KRITHPION: the sceptic as conceptual legatee’, in Id. Papers in Hellenistic philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 230–43.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1972. Lore and science in ancient Pythagoreanism. Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 2005. ‘Εἰκὼς μῦθος’, Rhizai 2: 143–65.Google Scholar
Bury, R. G. (ed.) 1949. Sextus Empiricus, Against professors. Translated by R. G. Bury. Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Busch, O. 1998. Logos Syntheseos. Die euklidische Sectio Canonis, Aristoxenos, und die Rolle der Mathematik in der antiken Musiktheorie. Berlin, Staatliches Institut für Musikforschung Preussischer Kulturbesitz.Google Scholar
Butterworth, G. W. 1916. ‘Clement of Alexandria’s Protrepticus and the Phaedrus of Plato’, Classical Quarterly 10/4: 198–205.Google Scholar
Butterworth, G. W. 1919. Clement of Alexandria. The Exhortation to the Greeks. The rich man’s salvation. And the fragment of an address entitled to the newly baptized. London, Heinemann.Google Scholar
Calabi, F. 2007. God’s acting, man’s acting. Tradition and philosophy in Philo of Alexandria, Leiden-Boston, Brill.Google Scholar
Calabi, F., Munnich, O., Reydams-Schils, G., and Vimercati, E. (eds.) 2015. Pouvoir et puissances chez Philon d’Alexandrie. Turnhout, Brepols.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, L. 2017. ‘Aporia and enquiry in ancient Pyrrhonism’, in Karamanolis, G. and Politis, V. (eds.), The aporetic tradition in ancient philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 205–27.Google Scholar
Castelli, L. M. 2018. Aristotle. Metaphysics. Book Iota. Oxford, Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caston, V. 1997. ‘Epiphenomenalisms, ancient and modern’, The Philosophical Review 106/3: 309–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caston, V. 2012. Alexander of Aphrodisias, On the Soul. Part I: Soul as form of the body, parts of the soul, nourishment, and perception. London, Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Celkyte, A. 2017. ‘Epicurus and aesthetic disinterestedness’, Mare Nostrum 7: 56–75.Google Scholar
Centrone, B. 2000. ‘Cosa significa essere pitagorico in età imperiale. Per una riconsiderazione della categoria storiografica del neopitagorismo’, in Brancacci, A. (ed.), La filosofia in età imperiale. Le scuole e le tradizioni filosofiche. Naples, Bibliopolis, 137–68.Google Scholar
Centrone, B. 2015. ‘Medioplatonismo e neopitagorismo: un confronto difficile’, Rivista di storia della filosofia 70/2: 399–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, H. 1953. Origen. Contra Celsum. Translated with an introduction and notes. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chase, M. 2010. ‘Porphyry on the cognitive process’, Ancient Philosophy 30: 383–405.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. (ed.) 1976. Plutarch. Moralia. Volume XIII, part I. Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. 2007. ‘Porphyry’s views on the immanent incorporeals’, in Karamanolis, G. and Sheppard, A. (eds.), Studies on Porphyry (supplement to the Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, vol. 98). London, Institute of Classical Studies, 34–49.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. 2013. ‘Platonist approaches to Aristotle: from Antiochus of Ascalon to Eudorus of Alexandria (and beyond)’, in Schofield (ed.), 28–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. 2014. ‘Plotinus’ metaphorical reading of the Timaeus: soul, mathematics, providence’, in d’Hoine, P. and van Riel, G. (eds.), Fate, providence and moral responsibility in ancient, medieval and early modern thought. Studies in honour of Carlos Steel. Leuven University Press, 187–210.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. 2015. ‘Plotinus’ account of demiurgic causation and its philosophical background’, in Marmodoro, A. and Prince, B. (eds.), Causation and creation in late Antiquity. Cambridge University Press, 31–50.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. 2019. ‘Plotinus on memory, recollection and discursive thought’, in Castagnoli, L. and Ceccarelli, P. (eds.), Greek memories. Theories and practices. Cambridge University Press, 310–24.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R.(unpublished), ‘The early Peripatetic commentators on Aristotle’s Categories and the previous philosophical tradition’, in A. Joosse and A. Ulacco (eds.), Dealing with disagreement. The construction of traditions in later ancient philosophy.Google Scholar
Chrétien, J.-L. 1990. La Voix Nue. Phénoménologie de la promesse. Paris, Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Chrétien, J.-L. 1997. Corps à corps. À l’écoute de l’œuvre d’art. Paris, Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Chrétien, J.-L. 2001. ‘Plotin en mouvement’, Archives de Philosophie 64/2: 243–58.Google Scholar
Clark, P. 2016. Plotinus: Myth, metaphor and philosophical practice. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. (ed.) 1997. Plato. Complete works. Indianapolis, Hackett.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. 2012. Pursuits of wisdom. Six ways of life in ancient philosophy from Socrates to Plotinus. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornford, F. M. 1937. Plato’s cosmology. The Timaeus of Plato translated with a running commentary. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Cortassa, G. 1981. ‘Sesto Empirico e gli ἐγκύκλια μαθήματα: un’introduzione a Sext. Emp. Adv. Math. I–VI’, in Giannantoni, G. (ed.), Lo scetticismo antico, 2 vols. Naples, Bibliopolis, 713–24.Google Scholar
Corti, L. 2015. ‘Scepticism, number and appearances. The ἀριϑμητικὴ τέκνη and Sextus’ targets in M I–VI’, Philosophie Antique 15: 121–45.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, C. H. 2006. ‘Clement of Alexandria and early Christian music’, Journal of Early Christian Studies 14/3: 255–82.Google Scholar
Costache, D. 2014. ‘Worldview and melodic imagery in Clement the Alexandrian, Saint Athanasius, and their antecedents in Saints Ignatius and Irenaeus’, Phronema 29/1: 21–60.Google Scholar
Creese, D. 2010. The monochord in ancient Greek harmonic science. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crippa, S. 2009. ‘Voce e musica au cœur del sapere oracolare in Plutarco’, in Castaldo, D., Restani, D., and Tassi, C. (eds.), Il sapere musicale e i suoi contesti da Teofrasto a Claudio Tolemeo. Ravenna, Longo Editore, 87–94.Google Scholar
da Rocha Júnior, A. R. 2008. ‘Plutarch and the music’, in Nikolaidis, A. G. (ed.), The unity of Plutarch’s work. Moralia themes in the Lives, features of the Lives in the Moralia. Berlin-New York, De Gruyter, 651–6.Google Scholar
Darras-Worms, A.-L. (ed.) 2007. Plotin, Traité 1 (I, 6). Introduction, traduction, commentaires et notes. Paris, Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar
Davidson Greaves, D. (ed.) 1986. Sextus Empiricus, Against the Musicians (Adversus musicos). A new critical text and translation. Lincoln-London, University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Decleva Caizzi, F. 1992. ‘Sesto e gli scettici’, Elenchos 13: 277–327.Google Scholar
de Haas, F. 2020. ‘The utility of musical theory and performance for the good life. A comparison between the ancient philosophical discussion and Cornelius Agrippa’s De incertitudine et vanitate scientiarum et artium’, in Gerbino, G. and Prins, J. (eds.), Hearing the Voice, Hearing the Soul: Music, Mind, and Body in Renaissance Thought. Turnhout, Brepols.Google Scholar
de Jésus, C. A. Martins 2009. ‘Dancing with Plutarch. Dance and dance theory in Plutarch’s Table Talks’, in Ribeiro Ferreira, J., Leão, D., Tröster, M., and Barata Dias, P. (eds.), Symposion and Philanthropia in Plutarch. Coimbra, Classica Digitalia/Centro de Estudos Clássicos e Humanísticos da Universidade de Coimbra, 403–14.Google Scholar
Delattre, D. 2001. ‘Vers une reconstruction de l’esthétique musicale de Philodème (à partir du livre IV des Commentaires sur la musique)’, in Auvray-Assayas, C. and Delattre, D. (eds.), Cicéron et Philodème: la polémique en philosophie. Paris, Éditions Rue d’Ulm, 371–84.Google Scholar
Delattre, D. 2006. ‘Présence de l’épicurisme dans le Contre les grammairiens et le Contre les musiciens de Sextus Empiricus’, in J. Delattre (ed.), 47–65.Google Scholar
Delattre, D.(ed.) 2007. Philodème de Gadara, Sur la musique, Livre IV. 2 vols. Paris, Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Delattre, J. (ed.) 2006. Sur le Contre les professeurs de Sextus Empiricus. Lille, Presses de l’Université de Charles-de Gaulle-Lille 3.Google Scholar
Delling, G. 1984. ‘The one who sees God in Philo’, in Grenspahn, F. E., Hilgert, E., and Mack, B. L. (eds.), Nourished with peace. Studies in Hellenistic Judaism in memory of Samuel Sandmel. Chico (CA), Scholars Press, 27–41.Google Scholar
De Marco, V. 1956. ‘L’introduzione al Πρὸς Μαϑηματικούς di Sesto Empirico’, Rendiconti della Accademia di archeologia, lettere e belle arti di Napoli 31: 117–60.Google Scholar
Demulder, B. 2017a. ‘Dining with the demiurge. Cosmic imagery and cosmological ethics in Plutarch’s Quaestiones Convivales 1.2’, in Amendola, S., Pace, G., and Volpe Cacciatore, P. (eds.), Immagini letterarie e iconografia nelle opere di Plutarco. Madrid, Ediciones Clásicas, 35–44.Google Scholar
Demulder, B. 2017b. ‘Is dualism a Greek word? Plutarch’s dualism as a cultural and historical phenomenon’, in Georgiadou, A. and Oikonomopoulou, K. (eds.), Space, time and language in Plutarch. Berlin-New York, De Gruyter, 205–14.Google Scholar
Den Boeft, J. 1970. Calcidius on fate. His doctrine and sources. Leiden-Boston, Brill.Google Scholar
Den Boeft, J. 1977. Calcidius on demons. Leiden-Boston, Brill.Google Scholar
Denniston, J. D. 1954. The Greek particles. 2nd ed. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Desbordes, F. 1990. ‘Le scepticisme et les “arts libéraux”: une étude de Sextus Empiricus, Adversus Mathematicos I–VI’, in Voelke, A.-J. (ed.), Le scepticisme antique. Perspectives historiques et systématiques. Lausanne, Cahiers de la Revue de théologie et de philosophie, n. 15, 167–79.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. 1977. The Middle Platonists. A study of Platonism 80 B.C. to A.D. 220. London, Duckworth.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. 1993. Alcinous, The handbook of Platonism. Translated with an introduction and commentary. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. 1996. The Middle Platonists. 80 B.C. to A.D. 220. Revised edition with a new afterword. Ithaca (NY), Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. 2014a. ‘The Muses in the Platonic Academy’, in Christian, K. W., Guest, C. E. L., and Wedepohl, C. (eds.), The Muses and their afterlife in post-classical Europe. London, Warburg Institute, 1–11.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. 2014b. ‘Pythagoreanism in the Academic tradition: the Early Academy to Numenius’, in Huffman 2014a, 250–73.Google Scholar
D’Ippolito, G. 2011. ‘Il De musica nel corpus plutarcheo: una paternità recuperabile’, Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 99: 207–25.Google Scholar
Donini, P. 1982. Le scuole, l’anima, l’impero: la filosofia antica da Antioco a Plotino. Turin, Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Donini, P. 1988. ‘La connaissance de Dieu et la hiérarchie divine chez Albinos’, in Van den Broek, R., Baarda, T., and Mansfeld, J. (eds.), Knowledge of God in the Graeco-Roman world. Leiden-Boston, Brill, 118–31.Google Scholar
Donini, P. 2002. ‘Apuleio: ineffabilità o inconoscibilità del principio?’, in Calabi, F. (ed.), Arrhetos theos. L’ineffabilità del primo principio nel medioplatonismo. Pisa, ETS, 93–102.Google Scholar
Donini, P. 2011. Plutarco, Il volto della luna. Introduzione, testo critico, traduzione e commento. Naples, D’Auria.Google Scholar
Donini, P. 2017. Plutarco, Il demone di Socrate. Introduzione, traduzione e commento. Rome, Carocci.Google Scholar
D’Ooge, M. L. 1926. Nicomachus of Gerasa, Introduction to Arithmetic. Translated into English by M. L. D’Ooge, with studies in Greek arithmetic by M. L. Robbins and F. E. Karpinski. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Dooley, W. E. 1989. Alexander of Aphrodisias, On Aristotle Metaphysics 1. Translated by W. E. Dooley. London, Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H., and Baltes, M. 1998. Der Platonismus in der Antike, IV 2: Einige grundlegende Axiome / Platonische Physik (im antiken Verständnis) II. Bausteine 125–150. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt, Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Durán Mañas, M. 2005. ‘La paideia y la música en Plutarco’, in Jufresa, M., Mestre, F., Gómez, P., and Gilabert, P. (eds.), Plutarc a la seva època. Paideia i societat. Barcelona, Imagraf Impresores, 69–76.Google Scholar
Emilsson, E. K. 1988. Plotinus on sense-perception. A philosophical study. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Emilsson, E. K. 2017. Plotinus. London-New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Falcon, A. (ed.) 2016. The Brill’s companion to the reception of Aristotle in Antiquity. Leiden-Boston, Brill.Google Scholar
Feke, J. 2018. Ptolemy’s philosophy: mathematics as a way of life. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fera, M. C. 2011. ‘Plutarco nel De musica’, Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 99: 191–206.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. 1995. Dio, idee e materia. La struttura del cosmo in Plutarco di Cheronea. Naples, D’Auria.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. 1996. ‘La generazione precosmica e la struttura della materia in Plutarco’, Museum Helveticum 53: 44–55.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. 2000. ‘Plutarch: Platonismus und Tradition’, in Erler, M. and Graeser, A. (eds.), Philosophen des Altertums. Vom Hellenismus bis zur Spätantike. Eine Einführung. Darmstadt, Primus Verlag, 109–27.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. 2001. ‘Struttura e funzione dell’esegesi testuale nel medioplatonismo: il caso del Timeo’, Athenaeum 89: 525–74.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. 2004. ‘Platone in Plutarco’, in Gallo, I. (ed.), La biblioteca di Plutarco. Naples, D’Auria, 225–35.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. 2012. ‘L’esegesi medioplatonica del Timeo: metodi, finaltà, risultati’, in Celia, F. and Ulacco, A. (eds.), Il Timeo. Esegesi greche, arabe, latine. Pisa University Press, 81–131.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. 2014. ‘Materia, movimento, anima e tempo prima della nascita dell’universo: Plutarco e Attico sulla cosmologia del Timeo’, in Coda, E. and Martini Bonadeo, C. (eds.), Études de logique et de cosmologie offertes à Henri Hugonnard-Roche. Paris, Vrin, 255–76.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. 2015. ‘Lucio Calveno Tauro e l’interpretazione didascalica della cosmogenesi del Timeo’, in Cardullo, L. and Iozzia, D. (eds.), Bellezza e virtù. Studi in onore di Maria Barbanti. Acireale, Bonanno, 307–19.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F., and Baldi, L. 2002. Plutarco, La generazione dell’anima nel Timeo. Naples, D’Auria.Google Scholar
Festugière, A. J. (ed.) 1970. Proclus, Commentaire sur la République, 3 vols. Paris, Vrin.Google Scholar
Finamore, J. F. 2006. ‘Apuleius on the Platonic gods’, in Tarrant, H. and Baltzly, D. (eds.), Reading Plato in Antiquity. London, Bloomsbury, 33–48.Google Scholar
Foley, E. 1996. Foundations of Christian music. The music of pre-constantinian Christianity. Collegeville (MN), The Liturgical Press.Google Scholar
Fortuna, S. 1987. ‘Sesto Empirico: ἐγκύκλια μαθήματα e arte utili alla vita’, Studi Classici e Orientali 36: 123–37.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. 1984. ‘Sceptics and Epicureans: a discussion of M. Gigante 1981’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2: 237–67.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. 2018. ‘Variations of receptions of Plato during the Second Sophistic’, in Tarrant, Layne, Baltzly, and Renaud (eds.), 223–49.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. 2014. Plato in the Third Sophistic. Berlin-New York, De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Frick, P. 1999. The concept of divine providence in Philo of Alexandria. Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Froidefond, C. 1987. ‘Plutarque et le platonisme’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.36.1: 184–233.Google Scholar
García López, J. 1999. ‘Banquete, vino y teoría musical en Plutarco: Quaestiones convivales (Moralia 612C-748D)’, in Montes Cala, J. G., Sánchez Ortiz de Landaluce, M., and Gallé Cejudo, R. J. (eds.), Plutarco, Dioniso y el vino. Madrid, Ediciones Clásicas, 243–53.Google Scholar
García López, J. 2000. ‘Terminología musical y géneros poéticos en Moralia de Plutarco’, in Gallo, I. and Moreschini, C. (eds.), I generi letterari in Plutarco. Naples, D’Auria, 287–98.Google Scholar
García López, J. 2002. ‘La μουσικὴ τέχνη en Plu. Quaestiones Convivales (Mor. 612C-748D)’, in Torraca, L. (ed.), Scritti in onore di Italo Gallo. Naples, Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, 303–14.Google Scholar
García López, J. 2003. ‘Οἱ ὀργανικοί y τὰ ὄργανα musicales en las Vidas (griegas) de Plutarco’, in Nieto Ibáñez, J. M. (ed.), Lógos Hellenikós. Homenaje al Profesor Gaspar Morocho Gayo, Vol. I. Universidad de León, 251–8.Google Scholar
García López, J. 2005. ‘Teoría musical y régimen político en las Vidas (griegas) de Plutarco’, in Jufresa, M., Mestre, F., Gómez, P., and Gilabert, P. (eds.), Plutarc a la seva època. Paideia i societat. Barcelona, Imagraf Impresores, 577–85.Google Scholar
Gelineau, J. 1962. Chant et musique dans le culte chrétien. Principes, lois et applications. Paris, Fleurus.Google Scholar
Gérold, T. 1931. Les Pères de l’Église et la musique. Paris, Alcan.Google Scholar
Gersh, S. 1986. Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism. The Latin tradition. University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Gersh, S. 1992. ‘Porphyry’s commentary on the Harmonics of Ptolemy and Neoplatonist musical theory’, in Gersh, S. and Kennengiesser, C. (eds.), Platonism in Late Antiquity. University of Notre Dame, 141–55 (reprinted in S. Gersh, Reading Plato, Tracing Plato, Variorum, Ashgate 2005, Item III).Google Scholar
Gersh, S 1996. Concord in discourse. Harmonics and semiotics in late classical and early Medieval Platonism. Berlin-New York, De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gersh, S 2000. ‘Proclus’ theological methods. The programme of Theol. Plat. I. 4’, in Segonds, A. Ph. and Steel, C. (eds.), Proclus et la théologie Platonicienne. Actes du Colloque International de Louvain, 13–16 mai 1998, en l’honneur de H. D. Saffrey et L. G. Westerink. Leuven University Press, 15–27 (reprinted in Id., Reading Plato, tracing Plato. From ancient commentary to medieval reception. Aldershot, Ashgate 2005, Item VI).Google Scholar
Gersh, S 2014. ‘Proclus as theologian’, in Id. (ed.), Interpreting Proclus. From Antiquity to the Renaissance. Cambridge University Press, 80–107.Google Scholar
Gersh, S 2017. ‘The Metaphysics of power, logos, and harmony in Porphyry’, in Finamore, J. F. and Klitenic Wear, S. (eds.), Defining Platonism. Essays in honor of the 75th birthday of John M. Dillon. Steubenville (OH), Franciscan University Press, 198–217.Google Scholar
Gerson, L. P. (ed.) 2010. The Cambridge history of philosophy in late Antiquity. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gerson, L. P. 2013. From Plato to Platonism. Ithaca (NY), Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Giardina, G. R. 1999. Giovanni Filopono matematico tra neopitagorismo e neoplatonismo. Commentario alla Introduzione Aritmetica di Nicomaco di Gerasa. Introduzione, testo, traduzione e note. Catania, CUECM.Google Scholar
Giardina, G. R. 2000. ‘Il concetto di numero nell’In Nicomachum di Giovanni Filopono’, in Bechtle, G. and O’Meara, D. J. (eds.), La philosophie des mathématiques de l’Antiquité tardive. Éditions Universitaires Fribourg Suisse, 149–71.Google Scholar
Giardina, G. R. 2012. ‘L’Epinomide negli scritti matematici neopitagorici e neoplatonici’, in Alesse, F. and Ferrari, F. (eds.), Epinomide. Studi sull’opera e la sua ricezione. Naples, Bibliopolis, 341–78.Google Scholar
Gibson, S. 2005. Aristoxenus of Tarentum and the birth of musicology. New York-London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Gigante, M. 1981. Scetticismo e epicureismo. Per l’avviamento di un discorso storiografico. Naples, Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Gioè, A. 2002. Filosofi medioplatonici del II secolo d.C. Naples, Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. 1978. Antiochus and the late Academy. Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Görgemanns, H., and Hirsch-Luipold, R. 2010. ‘Plutarch’, in Sorgner, S. L. and Schramm, M. (eds.), Musik in der antiken Philosophie. Eine Einführung. Würzburg, Königshausen & Neumann, 249–55.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, H. B. 1971. ‘Soul as harmonia’, Phronesis 16: 179–98.Google Scholar
Gourinat, J.-B. 2016. Plotin, Traité 20, Qu’est-ce que la dialectique? Paris, Vrin.Google Scholar
Granger, H. 1985. ‘The scala naturae and the continuity of kinds’, Phronesis 30/2: 181–200.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, D. 2016. The daimon in Hellenistic astrology. Origins and influence. Leiden-Boston, Brill.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, D. 2018. ‘Porphyry of Tyre on the daimon, birth and the stars’, in Brisson, L., O’Neill, S., and Timotin, A. (eds.), Neoplatonic demons and angels. Studies in Platonism, Neoplatonism, and the Platonic tradition, volume 20. Leiden-Boston, Brill, 102–39.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. J. 2015. Aristotle’s Categories in the early Roman empire. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. J. 2016. ‘Why philosophy begins with the categories. Perspectives from the 1st-century Greek commentators’, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 27: 19–42.Google Scholar
Gros, P. 2006. ‘Les fondements philosophiques de l’harmonie architecturale selon Vitruve (De architectura III–IV)’, in Id., Vitruve et la tradition des traités d’architecture. Fabrica et ratiocinatio. Rome, École française de Rome, 271–80.Google Scholar
Guitton, J. 1933. Le temps et l’éternité chez Plotin et saint Augustin. Paris, Boivin.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. 2005. Arts libéraux et philosophie dans la pensée antique, 2nd ed., Paris, Vrin.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. 2007. ‘Versuch einer doktrinalen Neueinordnung der Schule der Sextier’, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 150: 179–210.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. 1997. Plotin ou la simplicité du regard. Paris, Gallimard.Google Scholar
Hagel, S. 2009. Ancient Greek music. A new technical history. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halliwell, F. S. 2012. ‘Amousia: living without the Muses’, in Sluiter, I. and Rosen, R. M. (eds.), Aesthetic value in classical Antiquity. Leiden-Boston, Brill, 15–45.Google Scholar
Halton, T. 1983. ‘Clement’s lyre: a broken string, a new song’, The Second Century: a Journal of Early Christian Studies 3–4: 177–99.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 1995. The Sceptics. New York-London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Hardie, Ph. 1995. ‘The speech of Pythagoras in Ovid Metamorphoses 15: Empedoclean epos’, Classical Quarterly 45/1: 204–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harl, M. 1983. Origène. Philocalie, 1–20. Sur les Écritures. Introduction, texte, traduction et notes. Paris, Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar
Hayduck, M. (ed.) 1891. Alexandri Aphrodisiensis in Aristotelis Metaphysica commentaria. Berlin, Reimer.Google Scholar
Heath, Th. 1921. A history of Greek mathematics. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Helmer, J. 1937. Zu Plutarchs De animae procreatione in Timaeo. Ein Beitrag zum Verständnis des Platon-Deuters Plutarch. Würzburg, Richard Mayr.Google Scholar
Hershbell, J. P. 1987. ‘Plutarch’s De animae procreatione in Timaeo: an analysis of structure and content’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.36.1: 234–47.Google Scholar
Hicks, A. J. 2017. Composing the world. Harmony in the Medieval Platonic cosmos. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hirsch-Luipold, R. 2002. Plutarchs Denken in Bildern. Studien zur literarischen, philosophischen und religiösen Funktion des Bildhaften. Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Hoche, R. (ed.) 1866. Nicomachi Geraseni Pythagorei, Introductionis arithmeticae libri II. Leipzig, Teubner.Google Scholar
Hoenig, Ch. 2014. ‘Calcidius and the creation of the universe’, Rhizomata 2/1: 80–110.Google Scholar
Hoenig, Ch. 2018. Plato’s Timaeus in the Latin tradition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holzhausen, J. 1993. ‘Zur Inspirationslehre Plutarchs in De Pythiae Oraculis’, Philologus 137/1: 72–91.Google Scholar
Horky, P. S. 2013. Plato and Pythagoreanism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huffman, C. A. 1993. Philolaus of Croton. Pythagorean and Presocratic. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huffman, C. A.(ed.) 2014a. A history of Pythagoreanism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huffman, C. A. 2014b. ‘The Peripatetics on the Pythagoreans’, in Huffman 2014a, 274–95.Google Scholar
Irwin, E. 1982. ‘The songs of Orpheus and the new song of Christ’, in Warden, J. (ed.), Orpheus. The metamorphoses of a myth. University of Toronto Press, 51–62.Google Scholar
Janáček, K. 1972. Sextus Empiricus’ sceptical methods. Prague, Universita Karlova.Google Scholar
Janáček, K. 2008a. ‘Τά δέκα τῶν Σκεπτικῶν’, in Id. Studien zu Sextus Empiricus, Diogenes Laertius und zur pyrrhonischen Skepsis, ed. by Janda, J. and Karfik, F.. Berlin-New York, De Gruyter, 146–8 (originally in J. Irmscher, B. Doer, U. Peters, and R. Müller (eds.), Miscellanea critica I, Leipzig, 1964, 119–21).Google Scholar
Janáček, K. 2008b. ‘M I–VI als Schlüssel zu Sextos Empeirikos’ Schriften’, in Id. Studien zu Sextus Empiricus, Diogenes Laertius und zur pyrrhonischen Skepsis, ed. by Janda, J. and Karfik, F.. Berlin-New York, De Gruyter, 349–57 (originally in Listy filologické 117, 1994: 171–8).Google Scholar
Jankélévitch, V. 1961. La musique et l’ineffable. Paris, Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Jankélévitch, V. 1998. Plotin, Ennéades, I, 3 Sur la dialectique. Paris, Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 1967. ‘The teacher of Plutarch’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 71: 205–13.Google Scholar
Jourdan, F. 2008. ‘Le “Logos” et l’empereur, nouveaux Orphée. Postérité d’une image entrée dans la littérature avec Clément d’Alexandrie’, Vigiliae Christianae 62/4: 319–33.Google Scholar
Jourdan, F. 2010. Orphée et les Chrétiens. La réception du mythe d’Orphée dans la littérature chrétienne grecque des cinq premiers siècles. Tome I : Orphée, du repoussoir au préfigurateur du Christ. Paris, Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Jufresa, M. 2001. ‘El placer de la música supera el del amor’, in Pérez Jiménez, A. and Casadesús Bordoy, F. (eds.), Estudios sobre Plutarco. Misticismo y religiones mistéricas en la obra de Plutarco. Madrid, Ediciones Clásicas, 539–44.Google Scholar
Jürß, F. 2001. Sextus Empiricus, Gegen die Wissenschaftler 1–6. Aus dem Griechischen übersetzt, eingeleitet und kommentiert. Würzburg, Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
Kalbfleisch, C. (ed.) 1907. Simplicii in Aristotelis Categorias commentarium. Berlin, Reimer.Google Scholar
Karamanolis, G. 2006. Plato and Aristotle in agreement? Platonists on Aristotle from Antiochus to Porphyry. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Karamanolis, G. 2013. The philosophy of early Christianity. London-New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Kechagia, E. 2011. ‘Philosophy in Plutarch’s Table Talk. In jest or in earnest?’, in Klotz and Oikonomopoulou (eds.), 77–104.Google Scholar
Klotz, F. 2011. ‘Imagining the past. Plutarch’s play with time’, in Klotz and Oikonomopoulou (eds.), 161–78.Google Scholar
Klotz, F., and Oikonomopoulou, K. (eds.) 2011. The philosopher’s banquet. Plutarch’s Table Talk in the intellectual culture of the Roman empire. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
König, J. 2007. ‘Fragmentation and coherence in Plutarch’s Sympotic Questions’, in König, J. and Whitmarsh, T. (eds.), Ordering Knowledge in the Roman Empire. Cambridge University Press, 43–68.Google Scholar
König, J. 2011. ‘Self-promotion and self-effacement in Plutarch’s Table Talk’, in Klotz and Oikonomopoulou (eds.), 179–203.Google Scholar
Kraeling, C. H., and Mowry, L. 1957. ‘Music in the Bible’, in Wellesz, E. (ed.), The new Oxford history of music. Vol. 1: Ancient and Oriental music, Oxford University Press, 283–312.Google Scholar
Kramarz, A. 2016. The power and value of music. Its effect and ethos in classical authors and contemporary music theory. New York, Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kuisma, O. 1996. Proclus’ defence of Homer. Helsinki, Societas Humanarum Fennica.Google Scholar
Lamberton, R. 1986. Homer the theologian. Neoplatonist allegorical reading and the growth of the epic tradition. Berkeley-Los Angeles, University of California Press.Google Scholar
La Sala, R. 2010. ‘Sextus Empiricus’, in Sorgner, S. L. and Schramm, M. (eds.), Musik in der antiken Philosophie. Eine Einführung. Würzburg, Königshausen & Neumann, 257–73.Google Scholar
Laurent, J. 1992. Les fondements de la nature selon Plotin. Paris, Vrin.Google Scholar
Laurent, J. 2011. L’éclair dans la nuit. Plotin et la puissance du beau. Paris, Éditions de la Transparence.Google Scholar
Lautner, P. 2015. ‘Mental images in Porphyry’s Commentary on Ptolemy’s Harmonics’, Apeiron 48/2: 220–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavaud, L. 2006. ‘La diánoia médiatrice entre le sensible et l’intelligible’, Études Platoniciennes 3: 29–55.Google Scholar
Levarie, S. 1991. ‘Philo on music’, Journal of Musicology 9: 124–30.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. 2007. ‘La question de la dyade chez Philon d’Alexandrie’, in Bonazzi, M., Lévy, C., and Steel, C. (eds.), A Platonic Pythagoras. Platonism and Pythagoreanism in the imperial age. Turnhout, Brepols, 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévy, C. 2009. ‘Le scepticisme et les arts, de Pyrrhon à Enésidème’, in Le Blay, F. (ed.), Transmettre les savoirs dans les mondes hellénistique et romain. Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 93–106.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. 2011. ‘L’aristotélisme, parent pauvre de la pensée philonienne?’, in Bénatouïl, T., Maffi, E., and Trabattoni, F. (eds.), Plato, Aristotle, or both? Dialogues between Platonism and Aristotelianism in Antiquity. Hildesheim, Georg Olms Verlag, 17–33.Google Scholar
Lewis, E. 1988. ‘Diogenes Laertius and the Stoic theory of mixture’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 35: 84–90.Google Scholar
Lilla, S. 1971. Clement of Alexandria. A study in Christian Platonism and Gnosticism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lippman, E. A. 1964. Musical thought in ancient Greece. New York-London, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Loenen, J. H. 1956. ‘Albinus’ metaphysics: an attempt at rehabilition. I: The inner consistency and the original character of Albinus’ interpretation of Plato’, Mnemosyne 9/4: 296–319.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 1991. ‘The harmonics of Stoic virtue’, in Blumenthal, H. and Robinson, H. (eds.), Aristotle and the later tradition (Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Supplementary Volume). Oxford, Clarendon Press, 97–116.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 1996. Stoic studies. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Longo, A. (ed.) 2009. Plotin, Traité 2 (IV, 7). Paris, Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar
Lugaresi, L. 2003. ‘Metafore dello spettacolo in Origene’, in Perrone, L. (ed.), Origeniana Octava. Origen and the Alexandrian tradition. Papers of the 8th international Origen congress, Pisa 27–31 August 2001. Leuven University Press, 657–78.Google Scholar
Lugaresi, L. 2008. Il teatro di Dio. Il problema degli spettacoli nel cristianesimo antico (II–IV secolo). Brescia, Morcelliana.Google Scholar
Lugaresi, L. 2011. ‘Canto del Logos, dramma soteriologico e conoscenza di fede in Clemente Alessandrino’, in Radice, R. and Valvo, A. (eds.), Dal Logos dei Greci e dei Romani al Logos di Dio. Milan, Vita e Pensiero, 243–76.Google Scholar
Luna, C. 2001. Trois études sur la tradition des commentaires anciens à la Métaphysique d’Aristote. Leiden-Boston, Brill.Google Scholar
Lyon, E. L. 2016. ‘Ethical aspects of listening in Plato’s Timaeus. Pleasure and delight in 80b5-8’, Greek and Roman Musical Studies 4: 253–72.Google Scholar
Magee, J. (ed.) 2016. Calcidius. On Plato’s Timaeus. Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 1971. ‘Three Notes on Albinus’, Theta-Pi. A Journal for Greek and Early Christian Philosophy 1: 61–80 = In: J. Mansfeld (1989). Studies in Later Greek Philosophy and Gnosticism. London-New York, Routledge, chapt. 6.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 1992. Heresiography in context. Hippolytus’ Elenchos as a source for Greek philosophy. Leiden-Boston, Brill.Google Scholar
Marchand, S. 2011. ‘Sextus Empiricus’ style of writing’, in Machuca, D. E. (ed.), New essays on ancient Pyrrhonism. Leiden-Boston, Brill, 113–41.Google Scholar
Martinelli, M. C. (ed.) 2009. La Musa dimenticata. Aspetti dell’esperienza musicale greca in età ellenistica. Pisa, Edizioni della Normale.Google Scholar
McClary, S. 1995. ‘Music, the Pythagoreans, and the body’, in Foster, S. L. (ed.), Choreographing History. Bloomington-Indianapolis, Indiana University Press, 82–104.Google Scholar
McKinnon, J. (ed.) 1987. Music in early Christian literature. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. 2012. Philoponus, On Aristotle Posterior Analytics 1.9–18. London, Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
McLynn, N. 2004. ‘What was the Philocalia of Origen?’, Meddelanden från Collegium Patristicum Lundense 19: 32–43.Google Scholar
Meeusen, M. 2016. Plutarch’s science of natural problems. A study with commentary on Quaestiones Naturales. Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Michalewski, A. 2014. La puissance de l’intelligible. La théorie plotinienne des Formes au miroir de l’héritage médioplatonicien. Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Michalewski, A. 2021. ‘Writing in the soul. On some aspects of recollection in Plotinus’, in Decaix, V. and Thomsen Thörnqvist, C. (eds.), Memory and recollection in the Aristotelian tradition. Turnhout, Brepols.Google Scholar
Moraux, P. 1973. Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen: von Andronikos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias, vol. 1. Berlin-New York, De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Morel, P.-M. 2002. ‘La sensation, messagère de l’âme. Plotin V, 3 [49], 3’, in Dixsaut, M. (ed.), La connaissance de soi. Études sur le Traité 49 de Plotin. Paris, Vrin, 209–27.Google Scholar
Moreschini, C. 2015. Apuleius and the metamorphoses of Platonism. Turnhout, Brepols.Google Scholar
Moro Tornese, S. 2010. Philosophy of music in the Neoplatonic tradition. Theories of music and harmony in Proclus’ Commentaries on Plato’s Timaeus and Republic, unpublished doctoral thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Moro Tornese, S. 2015. ‘Music as therapy: the analogy between music and medicine in Neoplatonism’, Dionysius 33: 118–31.Google Scholar
Morrow, G. 1992. Proclus. A Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements. Translated with introduction and notes. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mosconi, G. 2009. ‘“Governare in armonia”: struttura e significato ideologico di un campo metaforico in Plutarco’, in Castaldo, D., Restani, D., and Tassi, C. (eds.), Il sapere musicale e i suoi contesti da Teofrasto a Claudio Tolemeo. Ravenna, Longo Editore, 105–28.Google Scholar
Moutsopoulos, E. 1959. La musique dans l’œuvre de Platon. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Moutsopoulos, E. 2004. La philosophie de la musique dans le système de Proclus. Athens, Académie d’Athènes.Google Scholar
Murray, P. 2002. ‘Plato’s Muses. The goddesses that endure’, in Spentzou, E. and Fowler, D. (eds.), Cultivating the Muse. Struggles for power and inspiration in classical literature. Oxford University Press, 29–46.Google Scholar
Murray, P., and Wilson, P. (eds.) 2004. Music and the Muses. The culture of ‘Mousikē’ in the classical Athenian city. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nesselrath, H.-G. 2010. Plutarch. On the daimonion of Socrates. Human liberation, divine guidance and philosophy. Tübingen, Mohr-Siebeck.Google Scholar
Nikolaidis, A. G. 1991. ‘Plutarch’s contradictions’, Classica et Mediaevalia 42: 153–86.Google Scholar
Noble, Ch. I. (forthcoming). ‘Human nature and normativity in Plotinus’, in Adamson, P. and Rapp, C. (eds.), State and nature: essays in ancient political philosophy. Berlin-New York, de Gruyter.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. J. 1989. Pythagoras revived. Mathematics and philosophy in late Antiquity. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. J. 2003. Platonopolis. Platonic political philosophy in late Antiquity. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. J. 2005. ‘The music of philosophy in late Antiquity’, in Sharples, R. W. (ed.), Philosophy and the sciences in Antiquity. Aldershot, Ashgate, 131–47.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. J. 2007. ‘Hearing the harmony of the spheres in late Antiquity’, in Bonazzi, M., Lévy, C., and Steel, C. (eds.), A Platonic Pythagoras. Platonism and Pythagoreanism in the imperial age. Turnhout, Brepols, 147–61.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. J. 2013. ‘Moral virtue in late antique Platonism. Some elements of a background to ethics in early Arabic philosophy’, Mélanges de l’Université Saint-Joseph (Beirut) 65: 47–61.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. 1994. ‘L’âme du monde et l’âme de l’homme chez Plutarque’, in García Valdés, M. (ed.), Estudios sobre Plutarco: ideas religiosas. Madrid, Ediciones Clásicas, 33–49.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. 1996. ‘Ζητήματα: structure et argumentation dans les Quaestiones Platonicae’, in Fernández Delgado, J. A. and Pordomingo Pardo, F. (eds.), Estudios sobre Plutarco: aspectos formales. Madrid, Ediciones Clásicas, 71–83.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. 1998. In search of the truth. Academic tendencies in Middle Platonism. Brussels, KAWLSK.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. 2004. ‘Plutarch’s De animae procreatione in Timaeo: manipulation or search for consistency?’, in Adamson, P., Baltussen, H., and Stone, M. W. F. (eds.), Philosophy, science and exegesis in Greek, Latin and Arabic commentaries (supplement to the Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 83). London, Institute of Classical Studies, 137–62.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. 2005a. ‘Plutarch’s Platonism revisited’, in Bonazzi, M. and Celluprica, V. (eds.), L’eredità platonica. Studi sul platonismo da Arcesilao a Proclo. Naples, Bibliopolis, 163–200.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. 2005b. ‘Demiurges in early Imperial Platonism’, in Hirsch-Luipold, R. (ed.), Gott und die Götter bei Plutarch. Berlin-New York, De Gruyter, 51–99.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. 2005c. ‘A craftsman and his handmaiden. Demiurgy according to Plotinus’, in Leinkauf, Th. and Steel, C. (eds.), Platons Timaios als Grundtext der Kosmologie in Spätantike, Mittelalter und Renaissance. Plato’s Timaeus and the foundations of cosmology in Late Antiquity, the Middle Ages and Renaissance. Leuven University Press, 67–102.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. 2009. ‘M. Annius Ammonius, a philosophical profile’, in Bonazzi, M. and Opsomer, J. (eds.), The origins of the Platonic system. Platonisms of the early empire and their philosophical contexts. Leuven, Peeters Publishers, 123–86.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. 2010. ‘Arguments non-linéaires et pensée en cercles. Forme et argumentation dans les Questions Platoniciennes de Plutarque’, in Brouillette, X. and Giavatto, A. (eds.), Les dialogues platoniciens chez Plutarque. Stratégies et méthodes exégétiques. Leuven University Press, 93–116.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. 2012. ‘Plutarch on the division of the soul’, in Barney, R., Brennan, T., and Brittain, C. (eds.), Plato and the divided self. Cambridge University Press, 311–30.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J., Roskam, G., and Titchener, F. B. (eds.) 2016. A versatile gentleman. Consistency in Plutarch’s Writing. Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Osborn, E. F. 1957. The philosophy of Clement of Alexandria. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Osborne, C. 2010. ‘Clement of Alexandria’, in Gerson (ed.), 270–82.Google Scholar
Pellegrin, P. 2002. ‘Introduction’, in Pellegrin, P. (ed.), Sextus Empiricus, Contre les professeurs. Paris, Éditions du Seuil, 9–47.Google Scholar
Pellegrin, P. 2006. ‘De l’unité du scepticisme sextien’, in J. Delattre (ed.), 35–45.Google Scholar
Pellegrin, P. 2010. ‘Sextus Empiricus’, in Bett, R. (ed.), The Cambridge companion to ancient Scepticism. Cambridge University Press, 120–41.Google Scholar
Pelosi, F. 2009. ‘Suoni simultanei: prassi esecutiva, ēthos e psicologia nei Problemata pseudoaristotelici’, in Martinelli (ed.), 205–24.Google Scholar
Pelosi, F. 2010. Plato on music, soul and body. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pelosi, F. 2014. ‘Dall’unisono alla dissonanza: definizioni di rapporti tra suoni nella teoria musicale greca’, Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa (Classe di Lettere e Filosofia), serie 5, 6/2: 681–702.Google Scholar
Pelosi, F. 2015. ‘Incantare con suoni e parole: l’epōidē nei dialoghi platonici’, in Malhomme, F. and Semi, M. (eds.), Parole e suoni. Contributo a una storia musicale della razionalità antica e moderna. Milan, Mimesis, 33–46.Google Scholar
Pelosi, F. 2016. ‘Music for life: embryology, cookery and harmonia in the Hippocratic On Regimen’, Greek and Roman Musical Studies 4/2: 191–208.Google Scholar
Pelosi, F. 2018. ‘Eight singing Sirens. Heavenly harmonies in Plato and the Neoplatonists’, in Prins, J. and Vanhaelen, M. (eds.), Sing aloud harmonious spheres. Renaissance conceptions of cosmic harmony. New York-London, Routledge, 15–30.Google Scholar
Pelosi, F.(forthcoming). Megiste mousike. Filosofia e musica nelle fonti della Grecia antica, vol. 1: dai Presocratici ad Aristosseno. Berlin-New York, De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pelosi, F., and Petrucci, F. M. (forthcoming). Megiste mousike. Filosofia e musica nelle fonti della Grecia antica, vol. 2: dalle filosofie ellenistiche agli autori cristiani. Berlin-New York, De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pernigotti, C. 2009. ‘Circolazione della cultura letteraria e forme di spettacolarità nel simposio Plutarcheo’, in Castaldo, D., Restani, D., and Tassi, C. (eds.), Il sapere musicale e i suoi contesti da Teofrasto a Claudio Tolemeo. Ravenna, Longo Editore, 95–103.Google Scholar
Petit, A. 1998. ‘Philon et le pythagorisme: un usage problématique’, in Lévy, C. (ed.), Philon d’Alexandrie et le langage de la philosophie. Turnhout, Brepols, 471–82.Google Scholar
Petrucci, F. M. 2011. ‘Una traccia della dialettica scolastica del primo Peripato: le sezioni musicali dei Problemata physica (XI e XIX)’, in Centrone, B. (ed.), Studi sui Problemata Physica Aristotelici. Naples, Bibliopolis, 175–238.Google Scholar
Petrucci, F. M. 2012a. Teone di Smirne, Expositio rerum mathematicarum ad legendum Platonem utilium. Sankt Augustin, Academia Verlag.Google Scholar
Petrucci, F. M. 2012b. ‘Il Commento al Timeo di Adrasto di Afrodisia’, Documenti e Studi sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 23: 1–32.Google Scholar
Petrucci, F. M. 2014. ‘Le témoignage du deuxième livre du Commentaire au Timée de Proclus sur la forme des arguments médio-platoniciens au sujet de la genèse du monde’, Revue des Études Grecques 127/2: 331–75.Google Scholar
Petrucci, F. M. 2016a. ‘Argumentative strategies in the “Platonic Section” of Plutarch’s De Iside et Osiride (chapters 45–64)’, Mnemosyne 69/2: 226–48.Google Scholar
Petrucci, F. M. 2016b. ‘Plutarch’s theory of cosmological powers in the De Iside et Osiride’, Apeiron 49/3: 329–67.Google Scholar
Petrucci, F. M. 2016c. ‘Argumentative strategies for interpreting Plato’s cosmogony: Taurus and the issue of literalism in Antiquity’, Phronesis 61/1: 43–59.Google Scholar
Petrucci, F. M. 2018a. Taurus of Beirut. The other side of Middle Platonism. New York-London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Petrucci, F. M. 2018b. ‘Theon of Smyrna and “Plato’s system of mathematics”: re-thinking Platonic mathematics in Middle Platonism’, in Tarrant, Layne, Baltzly, and Renaud (eds.), 143–55.Google Scholar
Petrucci, F. M. 2019a. ‘Making Sense of the Soul’s Numbers’, Apeiron 52: 65–92.Google Scholar
Petrucci, F. M. 2019b. ‘A homeopathic remedy for the human soul. The ethical import of the experience of music in Plutarch and other Middle Platonists’, Ancient Philosophy 39: 427–50.Google Scholar
Polito, R. 2014. Aenesidemus of Cnossus: Testimonia. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. 2014. ‘Aristotle on the “so-called Pythagoreans”: from lore to principles’, in Huffman 2014a, 227–49.Google Scholar
Provenza, A. 2012. ‘Aristoxenus and music therapy: fr. 26 Wehrli within the tradition on music and catharsis’, in Huffman, C. A. (ed.), Aristoxenus of Tarentum. Discussion. New Brunswick-London, Transaction Publishers, 91–128.Google Scholar
Radice, R. 2000. Oikeiosis. Ricerche sul fondamento del pensiero stoico e sulla sua genesi. Milan, Vita e Pensiero.Google Scholar
Raffa, M. 2002. La scienza armonica di Claudio Tolemeo. Messina, Edizioni Dr. Antonino Sfameni.Google Scholar
Raffa, M. 2016a. Claudio Tolemeo, Armonica con il Commentario di Porfirio. Milan, Bompiani.Google Scholar
Raffa, M.(ed.) 2016b. Porphyrius, Commentarius in Claudii Ptolemaei Harmonica. Berlin-New York, De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Raffa, M. 2017. ‘Artificio retorico o sapere musicale? L’accordatura del cosmo in Clemente alessandrino, Protrettico, 1, 5, 1–2’, Rivista di Cultura Classica e Medioevale 59/1: 47–57.Google Scholar
Raffa, M. 2018. Theophrastus of Eresus. Commentary, Vol. 9.1. Sources on Music (Texts 714-726 C). Leiden-Boston, Brill.Google Scholar
Ramelli, I. 2011. ‘The philosophical stance of allegory in Stoicism and its reception in Platonism, Pagan and Christian: Origen in dialogue with the Stoics and Plato’, International Journal of the Classical Tradition 18/3: 335–71.Google Scholar
Ramelli, I. 2018. ‘Origen to Evagrius’, in Tarrant, Layne, Baltzly, and Renaud (eds.), 271–91.Google Scholar
Rashed, M. 2007. Essentialisme. Alexandre d’Aphrodise entre logique, physique et cosmologie. Berlin-New York, De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rashed, M. 2013. ‘Boethus’ Aristotelian ontology’, in Schofield (ed.), 53–77.Google Scholar
Ravaisson, F. 1933. Testament philosophique et fragments. Paris, Boivin.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. 2007. ‘Andronicus of Rhodes and Boethus of Sidon on Aristotle’s Categories’, in R. Sorabji and R. W. Sharples (eds.), Greek and Roman Philosophy 100 BC–200 AD, 2 vols. (supplement to the Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 94). London, Institute of Classical Studies, 513–29.Google Scholar
Reiss, J. 1934. ‘Sextus Empiricus przeciw muzykom (Sextus Empiricus contre les musiciens)’, Bulletin International de l’Académie Polonaise des Sciences et des Lettres. Classe de Philologie, Classe d’Histoire et de Philosophie 7–10: 181–3.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. J. 1999. Demiurge and providence. Stoic and Platonist readings of Plato’s Timaeus. Turnhout, Brepols.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. J.(ed.) 2002. Plato’s Timaeus as cultural icon. University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. J. 2007. ‘Meta-discourse: Plato’s Timaeus according to Calcidius’, Phronesis 52/3: 301–27.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. J. 2017. ‘Maximus of Tyre on God and providence’, in Seaford, R., Wilkins, J., and Wright, M. (eds.), Selfhood and the soul. Essays on ancient thought and literature in honour of Christopher Gill. Oxford University Press, 125–38.Google Scholar
Riethmüller, A. 1975. ‘Die Hinfälligkeit musiktheoretischer Prinzipien nach Sextus Empiricus, Adversus Musicos’, Archiv für Musikwissenschaft 32: 184–95.Google Scholar
Rispoli, G. M. 1992. ‘Sesto Empirico e Filodemo contro i musici’, in El-Mosalawy, A. H. S. (ed.), Proceedings of the XIXth International Congress of Papyrology, Cairo 2–9 September 1989. Cairo, Ain Shams University Center of Papyrological Studies, 213–48.Google Scholar
Ritoók, Zs. 2004. Griechische Musikästhetik. Quellen zur Geschichte der antiken griechischen Musikästhetik. Frankfurt a.M., Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Rocconi, E. 2009. ‘Il suono musicale tra età ellenistica ed età imperiale’, in Martinelli (ed.), 191–204.Google Scholar
Rocconi, E. 2012. ‘Aristoxenus and musical Ēthos’, in Huffman, C. A. (ed.), Aristoxenus of Tarentum. Discussion. New Brunswick-London, Transaction Publishers, 65–90.Google Scholar
Roessli, J.-M. 2002. ‘Convergence et divergence dans l’interprétation du mythe d’Orphée. De Clément d’Alexandrie à Eusèbe de Césarée’, Revue de l’histoire des religions 219/4: 503–13.Google Scholar
Roessli, J.-M. 2008. ‘Imágenes de Orfeo en el arte judío y cristiano’, in Bernabé, A. and Casadesús, F. (eds.), Orfeo y la tradición órfica: un reencuentro, vol. 1. Madrid, Akal, 179–226.Google Scholar
Roessli, J.-M. 2014. ‘Assimilation chrétienne d’éléments païens. Construction apologétique ou réalité culturelle?’, Laval théologique et philosophique 70/3: 507–16.Google Scholar
Romano, F. 1979. Porfirio di Tiro: filosofia e cultura nel III secolo d.C. Università di Catania.Google Scholar
Romeyer-Dherbey, G. 1985. Les sophistes. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. 2011. ‘Two Quaestiones Socraticae in Plutarch’, in Candau Morón, J. M., González Ponce, F. J., and Chávez Reino, A. L. (eds.), Plutarco transmisor. Actas del X Simposio Internacional de la Sociedad Española de Plutarquistas, Sevilla, 12–14 de noviembre de 2009. Universidad de Sevilla, 419–31.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. 2013. ‘A ζήτημα on eros and poetry in Plutarch (Quaest. conv. 1,5)’, in Santana Henríquez, G. (ed.), Plutarco y las artes. Madrid, Ediciones Clásicas, 95–108.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. 2014. ‘Plutarch’s yearning after divinity. The introduction to On Isis and Osiris’, Classical Journal 110/2: 213–39.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. 2017. ‘On the multi-coloured robes of philosophy. Plutarch’s approach in On Isis and Osiris’, in Erler, M. and Stadler, M. A. (eds.), Platonismus und spätägyptische Religion. Plutarch und die Ägyptenrezeption in der römischen Kaiserzeit. Berlin-New York, De Gruyter, 199–218.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. 1993. Plato, Phaedo. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rowell, L. 1987. ‘Review of Davidson Greaves, Against the musicians (Adversus musicos) of Sextus Empiricus 1986’, Journal of Music Theory 31/2: 359–61.Google Scholar
Ruelle, Ch. É. 1898. ‘Sextus Empiricus contre les musiciens’, Revue des Études Grecques 11/42: 138–58.Google Scholar
Runia, D. T. 1993. ‘Was Philo a Middle Platonist? A difficult question revisited’, Studia Philonica Annual 5: 112–140.Google Scholar
Runia, D. T. 2001. Philo of Alexandria. On the creation of the cosmos according to Moses. Leiden-Boston, Brill.Google Scholar
Runia, D. T. and Share, M. 2008. Proclus, Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus, vol. II, Book 2: Proclus on the Causes of the Cosmos and Its Creation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Russo, A. (ed.) 1972. Sesto Empirico, Contro i Matematici, libri I–VI. Bari, Laterza.Google Scholar
Salles, R. 2017. ‘Soul as harmony in Phaedo 85e-86d and Stoic pneumatic theory’, in Harte, V. and Woolf, R. (eds.), Rereading ancient philosophy. Old chestnuts and sacred cows. Cambridge University Press, 221–39.Google Scholar
Sassi, M. M. (2015). ‘Parmenides and Empedocles on krasis and knowledge’, Apeiron 45: 1–19.Google Scholar
Scade, P. 2017. ‘Music and the soul in Stoicism’, in Seaford, R., Wilkins, J., and Wright, M. (eds.), Selfhood and the soul. Essays on ancient thought and literature in honour of Christopher Gill. Oxford University Press, 197–218.Google Scholar
Schlapbach, K. 2011. ‘Dance and discourse in Plutarch’s Table Talks 9.15’, in Schmidt, T. and Fleury, P. (eds.), Perceptions of the second sophistic and its times. Regards sur la Seconde Sophistique et son époque. University of Toronto Press, 149–68.Google Scholar
Schlapbach, K. 2018. The anatomy of dance discourse. Literary and philosophical approaches to dance in the later Graeco-Roman world. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 2007. ‘Aenesidemus: Pyrrhonist and “Heraclitean”’, in Ioppolo, A. M. and Sedley, D. N. (eds.), Pyrrhonists, Patricians, Platonizers. Hellenistic Philosophy in the period 155–86 BC. Naples, Bibliopolis, 271–338.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 2010. ‘Music all pow’rful’, in McPherran, M. L. (ed.), Plato’s Republic. A critical guide. Cambridge University Press, 229–48.Google Scholar
Schofield, M.(ed.) 2013. Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the first century BC. New directions for philosophy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. 1976. ‘Epicurus and his professional rivals’, in Bollack, J. and Laks, A. (eds.), Études sur l’Epicurisme antique, Publications de l’Université de Lille, Cahiers de Philologie 1, 121–59.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. 1985. ‘Three notes on Theophrastus’ treatment of tastes and smells’, in Fortenbaugh, W. W., together with Huby, P. M. and Long, A. A. (eds.), Theophrastus of Eresus. On his life and work. New Brunswick-Oxford, Transaction Books, 205–7.Google Scholar
Segonds, A. Ph. 1992. ‘À propos d’une page du De aeternitate mundi de Jean Philopon’, in Goulet-Cazé, M. O., Madec, G., and O’Brien, D. (eds.), ΣΟΦΙΗΣ ΜΑΙΗΤΟΡΕΣ, Chercheurs de sagesse, Hommage à Jean Pépin. Paris, Institut d’ Etude Augustiniennes, 461–79.Google Scholar
Share, M. 2005. ‘John Philoponus, Against Proclus’s on the eternity of the world 1–5’. Ithaca (NY), Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. 1985. ‘Theophrastus on tastes and smells’, in Fortenbaugh, W. W., together with Huby, P. M. and Long, A. A. (eds.), Theophrastus of Eresus. On his life and work. New Brunswick-Oxford, Transaction Books, 183–204.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. 2003. ‘Threefold providence: the history and background of a doctrine’, in Sharples, R. W. and Sheppard, A. (eds.), Ancient approaches to Plato’s Timaeus (supplement to the Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 78). London, Institute of Classical Studies, 107–27.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W.(ed.) 2005. Philosophy and the sciences in Antiquity. Aldershot, Ashgate.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. 2010. Peripatetic philosophy 200 BC to AD 200. An introduction and collection of sources in translation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sheppard, A. 2005. ‘Music therapy in Neoplatonism’, in R. W. Sharples (ed.), 148–55.Google Scholar
Sheppard, A. 2017. ‘Neoplatonists and pantomime dancers’, in Cardullo, R. L. and Coniglione, F. (eds.), Reason and no-reason from ancient philosophy to neurosciences. Old parameters, new perspectives. Sankt Augustin, Academia Verlag, 65–78.Google Scholar
Shorey, P. 1916. ‘Notes on Sextus Empiricus ΠΡΟΣ ΜΟΥΣΙΚΟΥΣ 21’, Classical Philology 11/1: 99.Google Scholar
Simonetti, E. G. 2017. A perfect medium? Oracular divination in the thought of Plutarch. Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Skeris, R. A. 1976. ΧΡΩΜΑ ΘΕΟΥ. On the origins and theological interpretation of the musical imagery used by the ecclesiastical writers of the first three centuries, with special reference to the image of Orpheus. Altötting, Alfred Coppenrath.Google Scholar
Slaveva-Griffin, S. 2009. Plotinus on number. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Slings, S. R. 1999. Plato, Clitophon. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 2010. ‘Porphyry and his school’, in Gerson (ed.), 325–57.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1974. Porphyry’s place in the Neoplatonic tradition. A study in post-Plotinian Neoplatonism. The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Smith, W. S. 1962. Musical aspects of the New Testament. Amsterdam, Uitgeverij W. Ten Have N.V.Google Scholar
Smits, J. P. H. M. 1970. Plutarchus en de Griekse muziek. Bilthoven, Creyghton.Google Scholar
Somfai, A. 2003. ‘The nature of daemons. A theological application of the concept of geometrical proportion in Calcidius’ Commentary to Plato’s Timaeus (40d-41a)’, in Sharples, R. W. and Sheppard, A. (eds.), Ancient approaches to Plato’s Timaeus (supplement to the Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 78). London, Institute of Classical Studies, 129–42.Google Scholar
Spinelli, E. 2008. ‘Sesto Empirico contro i musici: contesto e senso di una polemica antica’, in Tatasciore, C. (ed.), Filosofia e musica. Milan, Mondadori, 41–56.Google Scholar
Spinelli, E. 2010. ‘Pyrrhonism and the specialized sciences’, in Bett, R. (ed.), The Cambridge companion to ancient Scepticism. Cambridge University Press, 249–64.Google Scholar
Spinelli, E. 2014. ‘Sesto, Pitagora, la musica’, in Cardullo, R. L. and Iozzia, D. (eds.), ΚΑΛΛΟΣ ΚΑΙ ΑΡΕΤH – Bellezza e virtú: Studi in onore di Maria Barbanti. Acireale-Rome, Bonanno Editore, 335–47.Google Scholar
Spinelli, E. 2016. ‘“Are flute-players better than philosophers?” Sextus Empiricus on music, against Pythagoras’, in Renger, A.-B. and Stavru, A. (eds.), Pythagorean knowledge from the Ancient to the Modern World: askesis, religion, science. Wiesbaden, Harrassowitz Verlag, 305–18.Google Scholar
Staehle, K. 1931. Die Zahlenmystik bei Philon von Alexandreia. Leipzig, Teubner.Google Scholar
Stapert, C. R. 2007. A new song for an old world. Musical thought in the early Church. Grand Rapids (MI)-Cambridge (UK), W. B. Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Sterling, G. E. 1993. ‘Platonizing Moses: Philo and Middle Platonism’, Studia Philonica Annual 5: 96–111.Google Scholar
Stover, J. A. (ed.) 2016. A new work by Apuleius: The lost third book of the ‘De Platone’. Edited and translated with an introduction and commentary. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. 1993. Thrasyllan Platonism. Ithaca (NY), Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. 2004. ‘Must commentators know their sources? Proclus’ In Timaeum and Numenius’, in Adamson, P., Baltussen, H., and Stone, M. W. F. (eds.), Philosophy, science and exegesis in Greek, Latin and Arabic commentaries (supplement to the Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 83/1–2). London, Institute of Classical Studies, 175–90.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. 2017a. Proclus: Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus, vol. VI, Book 5: Proclus on the Gods of Generation and the Creation of Humans. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. 2017b. ‘Plotinus, Origenes, and Ammonius on the King’, in van Kooten, G. H. and Petersen, A. K. (eds.), Religio-philosophical discourses in the Mediterranean world. From Plato, through Jesus, to late Antiquity. Leiden-Boston, Brill, 323–37.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H., and Johnson, M. 2018. ‘Porphyry and “Neopythagorean” exegesis in Cave of the Nymphs and elsewhere’, Méthexis 30: 154–74.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H., Layne, D. A., Baltzly, D., and Renaud, F. (eds.) 2018. Brill’s companion to the reception of Plato in Antiquity. Leiden-Boston, Brill.Google Scholar
Tassi, C. 2009. ‘Esperienze sonore in Plutarco’, in Castaldo, D., Restani, D., and Tassi, C. (eds.), Il sapere musicale e i suoi contesti da Teofrasto a Claudio Tolemeo. Ravenna, Longo Editore, 129–44.Google Scholar
Teodorsson, S.-T. 1996. A commentary on Plutarch’s Table Talks. Vol. III. Gothenburg, Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Towey, A. 2000. Alexander of Aphrodisias, On Aristotle’s On Sense Perception. Ithaca (NY), Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Tsouna-McKirahan, V. 1996. ‘Conservatism and Pyrrhonian Skepticism’, Syllecta Classica 6: 69–86.Google Scholar
Ulacco, A. 2016. ‘The appropriation of Aristotle in the ps-Pythagorean treatises’, in Falcon (ed.), 202–17.Google Scholar
Van den Berg, R. 2001. Proclus’ Hymns. Essays, translation, commentary. Leiden-Boston, Brill.Google Scholar
Van den Hoek, A. 1996. ‘Techniques of quotation in Clement of Alexandria. A view of ancient literary working methods’, Vigiliae Christianae 50/3: 223–43.Google Scholar
van den Hoek, A. 2005. ‘Apologetic and protreptic discourse in Clement of Alexandria’, in Wlosok, A. and Paschoud, F. (eds.), L’apologétique chrétienne gréco-latine à l’époque prénicénienne (Entretiens sur l’Antiquité Classique 51), Vandœuvres-Genève, Fondation Hardt, 69–102.Google Scholar
Van der Stockt, L. 1992. ‘Plutarch on τέχνη’, in Gallo, I. (ed.), Plutarco e le scienze. Genoa, Sagep Editrice, 287–95.Google Scholar
van der Stockt, L. 2009. ‘“The tunes of death”. Music as a way to the divine in Plutarch’s De superstitione, Quaestiones Convivales IX 14, and Non posse suaviter vivi secundum Epicurum’, in Karamalengou, E. and Makrygianni, E. (eds.), ᾿Αντιφίλησις: Studies on Classical, Byzantine and Modern Greek literature and culture in honour of Professor John-Theophanes A. Papademetriou. Stuttgart, Franz Steiner Verlag, 401–13.Google Scholar
Van Winden, J. C. M. 1959. Calcidius on matter: his doctrine and sources. A chapter in the history of Platonism. Leiden-Boston, Brill.Google Scholar
Van Winden, J. C. M. 1978. ‘Quotations from Philo in Clement of Alexandria’s Protrepticus’, Vigiliae Christianae 32/3: 208–13.Google Scholar
Veres, M. 2020. ‘Keep calm and carry on: Sextus Empiricus on the origins of Pyrrhonism’, in J. K. Larsen and P. Steinkrüger (eds.), Ancient Modes of Philosophical Inquiry (special issue of History of Philosophy and Logical Analysis 23/1).Google Scholar
Vernière, Y. 1977. Symboles et mythes dans la pensée de Plutarque. Essai d’interprétation philosophique et religieuse des Moralia. Paris, Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Viltanioti, I.-F. 2015. L’harmonie des Sirènes du pythagorisme ancien à Platon. Berlin-Boston, De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wakker, G. 1997. ‘Emphasis and affirmation. Some aspects of μήν in tragedy’, in Rijksbaron, A. (ed.), New approaches to Greek particles. Amsterdam, J. C. Gieben, 209–31.Google Scholar
Wallies, M. (ed.) 1891. Alexandri Aphrodisiensis In Aristotelis Topicorum libros octo commentaria. Berlin, Reimer.Google Scholar
Warren, J. 2002. Epicurus and Democritean ethics. An archaeology of ataraxia. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Warren, J. 2003. ‘Sextus Empiricus and the tripartition of time’, Phronesis 48/4: 313–43.Google Scholar
Waszink, J. H. 1957. ‘Der Platonismus und die altchristliche Gedankenwelt’, in Recherches sur la tradition platonicienne (Entretiens sur l’Antiquité Classique 3), Vandœuvres-Genève, Fondation Hardt, 137–79.Google Scholar
Waszink, J. H. 1964. Studien zum ‘Timaioskommentar’ des Calcidius. Die erste Hälfte des Kommentars. Leiden-Boston, Brill/Warburg Institute.Google Scholar
Waszink, J. H., and Jensen, P. J. (eds.) 1962. Plato, Timaeus a Calcidio translatus commentarioque instructus. Leiden-Boston, Brill/Warburg Institute.Google Scholar
Webb, R. 2008a. Demons and dancers. Performance in late Antiquity, Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Webb, R. 2008b. ‘Inside the mask: pantomime from the performers’ perspective’, in Hall, E. and Wyles, R. (eds.), New directions in ancient pantomime. Oxford University Press, 43–60.Google Scholar
Weil, H., and Reinach, T. 1900. Plutarque, De la musique. Paris, Leroux.Google Scholar
Wendland, P. (ed.) 1901. Alexandri Aphrodisiensis in librum de sensu commentarium. Berlin, Reimer.Google Scholar
Wersinger, A. G. 2007. ‘La philosophie entre logique et musique. Sextus Empiricus et la diaphônia (Discussion de quelques arguments de Jonathan Barnes)’, Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 56/4: 499–519.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1992. Ancient Greek Music. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Whitaker, G. H. 1929. The Works of Philo of Alexandria, v. 1. London, William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Wilberding, J. 2008. ‘Automatic action in Plotinus’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 34: 373–407.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L. P. 1938. ‘Philodemus on ethos in music’, Classical Quarterly 32/3–4: 174–81.Google Scholar
Wolff, F. 2015. Pourquoi la musique? Paris, Fayard.Google Scholar
Woodruff, P. 1988. ‘Aporetic Pyrrhonism’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 6: 139–68.Google Scholar
Woodward, L. 2010. ‘Diogenes of Babylon reading Plato on music’, in Harte, V., McCabe, M. M., Sharples, R. W., and Sheppard, A. (eds.), Aristotle and the Stoics reading Plato (supplement to the Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 107). London, Institute of Classical Studies, 233–53.Google Scholar
Zhmud, L. 2012a. Pythagoras and the early Pythagoreans. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zhmud, L. 2012b. ‘Aristoxenus and the Pythagoreans’, in Huffman, C. A. (ed.), Aristoxenus of Tarentum. Discussion. New Brunswick-London, Transaction Publishers, 223–49.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Francesco Pelosi, Università degli Studi, Pisa, Federico M. Petrucci, Università degli Studi di Torino, Italy
  • Book: Music and Philosophy in the Roman Empire
  • Online publication: 27 November 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108935753.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Francesco Pelosi, Università degli Studi, Pisa, Federico M. Petrucci, Università degli Studi di Torino, Italy
  • Book: Music and Philosophy in the Roman Empire
  • Online publication: 27 November 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108935753.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Francesco Pelosi, Università degli Studi, Pisa, Federico M. Petrucci, Università degli Studi di Torino, Italy
  • Book: Music and Philosophy in the Roman Empire
  • Online publication: 27 November 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108935753.015
Available formats
×