Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-rlmms Total loading time: 0.761 Render date: 2021-10-21T22:36:22.422Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

13 - Comparative Political Thought

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2017

Adrian Blau
King's College London
Get access


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Ackerly, Brooke, 2001. ‘Women’s human rights activists as cross-cultural theorists’, International Feminist Journal of Politics 3, 311–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerly, Brooke, 2005. ‘Is liberalism the only way toward democracy? Confucianism and democracy’, Political Theory 33, 547–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerly, Brooke, 2008. Universal Human Rights in a World of Difference. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerly, Brooke and True, Jacqui, 2010. Doing Feminist Research in Political and Social Science. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerly, Brooke and True, Jacqui, 2012. ‘Methods and methodologies’, in Waylen, Georgina, Celis, Karen, Kantola, Johanna and Weldon, Laurel, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics. Oxford University Press, 109–33.Google Scholar
Angle, Stephen, 2002. Human Rights and Chinese Thought: A Cross-cultural Inquiry. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angle, Stephen, 2005. ‘Decent democratic centralism’, Political Theory 33, 518–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angle, Stephen, 2012. Contemporary Confucian Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Talal, Asad, 1993. Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Bajpai, Rochana, 2002. ‘The conceptual vocabularies of secularism and minority rights in India’, Journal of Political Ideologies 7, 179–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajpai, Rochana, 2011. Debating Difference: Group Rights and Liberal Democracy in India. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajpai, Rochana, 2012. ‘Liberalisms in India: a sketch’, in Jackson, Ben and Stears, Marc, eds., Liberalism as Ideology: Essays in Honour of Michael Freeden. Oxford University Press, 5376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajpai, Rochana and Brown, Graham, 2013. ‘From ideas to hegemony: ideational change and affirmative action policy in Malaysia, 1955–2010’, Journal of Political Ideologies 18, 257–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Daniel, 2000. East Meets West: Human Rights and Democracy in East Asia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Daniel, 2006. Beyond Liberal Democracy: Political Thinking for an East Asian Context. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Daniel, 2008. China’s New Confucianism: Politics and Everyday Life in a Changing Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Beltrán, Cristina, 2009. ‘Going public’, Political Theory 37, 595622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevir, Mark and Rhodes, R. A. W., 2002. ‘Interpretive theory’, in Marsh, David and Stoker, Gerry, eds., Theory and Methods in Political Science. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 131–52.Google Scholar
Browers, Michaelle, 2006. Democracy and Civil Society in Arab Political Thought: Transcultural Possibilities. Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Cabrera, Luis, 2010. The Practice of Global Citizenship. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, Joseph Cho Wai, 1997. ‘An alternative view’, Journal of Democracy 8, 3548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, Joseph Cho Wai, 2009. ‘Is there a Confucian perspective on social justice?’, in Shogimen, Takashi and Nederman, Cary, eds., Western Political Thought in Dialogue with Asia. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 261–77.Google Scholar
Chan, Joseph Cho Wai, 2015. Confucian Perfectionism: A Political Philosophy for Modern Times. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Clifford, Stacy, 2012. ‘Making disability public in deliberative democracy’, Contemporary Political Theory 11, 211–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dallmayr, Fred, ed., 1999. Border Crossings: Toward a Comparative Political Theory. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Dallmayr, Fred, 2004. ‘Beyond monologue: for a comparative political theory’, Perspectives on Politics 2, 249–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Euben, Roxanne Leslie, 1999. Enemy in the Mirror: Islamic Fundamentalism and the Limits of Modern Rationalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Euben, Roxanne Leslie, 2006. Journeys to the Other Shore: Muslim and Western Travelers in Search of Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Forman, Fonna and Cruz, Teddy, forthcoming. ‘Global justice at the municipal scale: the case of Medellín, Colombia’, in Pogge, Thomas and Cabrera, Luis, eds., Institutional Cosmopolitanism. Oxford University Press.
Forst, Rainer, 2001. ‘Towards a critical theory of transnational justice’, Metaphilosophy 32, 160–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeden, Michael, 1996. Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Freeden, Michael, 2007. ‘The comparative study of political thinking’, Journal of Political Ideologies 12, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeden, Michael and Vincent, Andrew, eds., 2013. Comparative Political Thought: Theorizing Practices. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fricker, Miranda, 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis, 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Gaus, Gerald, 1990. Value and Justification: The Foundations of Liberal Theory. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, Clifford, 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Godrej, Farah, 2011. Cosmopolitan Political Thought: Method, Practice, Discipline. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Jane Anna, 2014. Creolizing Political Theory: Reading Rousseau through Fanon. Bronx: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goto-Jones, Chris, 2011. ‘A cosmos beyond space and area studies: toward comparative political thought as political thought’, boundary 2 38, 87118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnell, John, 2010. ‘Professing political theory’, Political Research Quarterly 63, 674–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzog, Don, 1985. Without Foundations: Justification in Political Theory. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel, 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Iqtidar, Humeira, 2011Secularism beyond the state: the “state” and the “market” in Islamist imagination’, Modern Asian Studies 45, 535–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaac, Jeffrey, 1995. ‘The strange silence of political theory’, Political Theory 23, 636–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenco, Leigh, 2007. ‘“What does heaven ever say?” A methods-centered approach to cross-cultural engagement’, American Political Science Review 101, 741–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenco, Leigh, 2011. ‘Recentering political theory: the promise of mobile locality’, Cultural Critique 79, 2759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman-Osborn, Timothy, 2010. ‘Political theory as profession and as subfield?’, Political Research Quarterly 63, 655–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, Christine, 2011. Decolonizing Democracy: Transforming the Social Contract in India. Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Kim Dae, Jung, 1994. ‘Is culture destiny: the myth of Asia’s anti-democratic values’, Foreign Affairs 73.Google Scholar
Kim, Sungmoon, 2014. Confucian Democracy in East Asia: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laborde, Cécile, 2008. Critical Republicanism: The Hijab Controversy and Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, Eva, 2005. ‘Universal rights in conflict: “backlash” and “benevolent resistance” to indigenous land rights’, Anthropology Today 21, 1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahmood, Saba, 2005. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
March, Andrew, 2009. ‘What is comparative political theory?’, The Review of Politics 71, 531–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Karl, 1967. Writings of the Young Marx on Philosophy and Society, ed. Easton, Loyd David and Guddat, Kurt. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Medina, José, 2012. The Epistemology of Resistance: Gender and Racial Oppression, Epistemic Injustice, and Resistant Imaginations. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, Charles, 2015. ‘Decolonizing Western political philosophy’, New Political Science 37, 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Matthew, 2011. In the Shadow of Shari, ah: Islam, Islamic Law, and Democracy in Pakistan. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Parel, Anthony, 2006. Gandhi’s Philosophy and the Quest for Harmony. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rothschild, Cynthia, Long, Scott and Fried, Susana, eds., 2005. Written Out: How Sexuality Is Used to Attack Women’s Organizing. New York: International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission & The Center for Women’s Global Leadership.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ian, 2005. The Flight from Reality in the Human Sciences. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tan, Sor-Hoon, 2003. Confucian Democracy: A Deweyan Reconstruction. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles, 1985. Philosophy and the Human Sciences. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Megan, 2010. ‘Orientalism and comparative political theory’, The Review of Politics 72, 653–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripp, Charles, 2013. ‘Acting and acting out: conceptions of political participation in the Middle East’, in Freeden, Michael and Vincent, Andrew, eds., Comparative Political Thought: Theorizing Practices. New York: Routledge, 88109.Google Scholar
Von Vacano, Diego, 2015. ‘The scope of comparative political theory’, Annual Review of Political Science 18, 465–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedeen, Lisa, 2002. ‘Conceptualizing culture: possibilities for political science’, American Political Science Review 96, 713–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedeen, Lisa, 2008. Peripheral Visions: Publics, Power, and Performance in Yemen. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, Laurence, 2013. ‘Latin American approaches to “the political”’, in Freeden, Michael and Vincent, Andrew, eds., Comparative Political Thought: Theorizing Practices. New York: Routledge, 4059.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon, 1969. ‘Political theory as a vocation’, American Political Science Review 63, 1062–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanow, Dvora and Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine, eds., 2013. Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Zakaria, Fareed, 1994. ‘Culture is destiny: a conversation with Lee Kuan Yew’, Foreign Affairs 73, 109–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats