Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-pkshj Total loading time: 0.83 Render date: 2021-11-28T10:17:38.155Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

7 - Political Liberalism, Islamic Family Law, and Family Law Pluralism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2011

Joel A. Nichols
Affiliation:
University of St Thomas, Minnesota
Get access

Summary

Western democracies in recent years have witnessed dramatic (and often highly charged) debates regarding Islamic law, women, and the limits of pluralism in a liberal polity. Perhaps the most relevant of these for the issue of family law pluralism was the “Shari‘a Arbitration controversy” of Ontario, Canada, of 2004–2005. Although Jewish, Christian, and Isma‘ili Muslim (a relatively small sect of Shi‘a Muslims who follow the Agha Khan) residents of Ontario had long made use of private arbitration for the resolution of intracommunal family disputes, when a group of Sunni Muslims announced their intent to establish a mechanism to allow orthodox Muslims to arbitrate their family law disputes in accordance with their understanding of Islamic law, a transatlantic controversy erupted that was resolved only when Ontario took the drastic step of prohibiting the arbitration of all family law disputes in which the arbitrator purported to apply non-Canadian law. Great Britain, too, experienced its own moment of Islamic law anxiety when the Archbishop of Canterbury suggested that British commitments to pluralism might require the English legal system to recognize certain aspects of Islamic law. That controversy was subsequently heightened when it was revealed that British Muslims had already set up judicial councils that engaged in legally binding arbitration of family law disputes pursuant to British law permitting binding arbitration.

Given the general anxiety surrounding Islamic law in Western democracies, the fact that fear of Islamic law should be a substantial stumbling block to increasing legal pluralism in the domain of family law is ironic given the pluralistic nature of Islamic law’s regulation of the family. At the same time, legal recognition of family law pluralism is not without its genuine risks: The rules of Islamic family law, as well as the rules and traditions of other subcommunities within a liberal polity, are not substantively equivalent to the generally applicable rules of civil law. Any system of family law pluralism within a liberal polity, therefore, must establish institutional mechanisms to ensure that legal pluralism does not become a tool to deprive individuals of their rights as citizens.

Type
Chapter
Information
Marriage and Divorce in a Multi-Cultural Context
Multi-Tiered Marriage and the Boundaries of Civil Law and Religion
, pp. 164 - 199
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gaudreault-DesBiens, Jean-FrancoisThe Limits of Private Justice? The Problems of the State Recognition of Arbitral Awards in Family and Personal Status Disputes in OntarioPerspectives 16 2005 18Google Scholar
Bakht, Natasha 2004
Shachar, AyeletPrivatizing Diversity: A Cautionary Tale from Religious Arbitration in Family LawTheoretical Inquiries in Law 9 2008 573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emon, AnverIslamic Law and the Canadian Mosaic: Politics, Jurisprudence, and Multicultural AccommodationCanadian Bar Review 87 2009 391Google Scholar
Williams, MelissaThe Ties that BindBrusselsP.I.E. Peter Lang 2009Google Scholar
Bakht, NatashaWere Muslim Barbarians Really Knocking on the Gates of Ontario?: The Religious Arbitration Controversy – Another PerspectiveOttawa Law Review 40 2006 67Google Scholar
Burns, John F. 2008
Nichols, Joel A.Multi-Tiered Marriage: Ideas and Influences from New York and Louisiana to the International CommunityVanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 40 2007 135Google Scholar
Moller Okin, SusanIs Multiculturalism Bad for Women?Cohen, JoshuaHoward, MatthewNussbaum, Martha C.Princeton, NJPrinceton University Press 1999Google Scholar
Korteweg, Anna C.The Sharia Debate in OntarioISIM Review 18 2006 50Google Scholar
Wax, Amy L.Bargaining in the Shadow of the Market: Is There a Future for Egalitarian Marriage?Virginia Law Review 84 1998 509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frantz, Carolyn J.Dagan, HanochProperties of MarriageColumbia Law Review 104 2004 75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starnes, LeeMothers, Myths, and the Law of Divorce: One More Feminist Case for PartnershipWilliam and Mary Journal of Women and the Law 13 2006 203Google Scholar
Tsoukala, PhilomilaGary Becker, Legal Feminism, and the Costs of Moralizing CareColumbia Journal of Gender and Law 16 2007 357Google Scholar
Rawls, JohnThe Idea of Public Reason RevisitedUniversity of Chicago Law Review 64 1997 765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, JohnPolitical LiberalismNew YorkColumbia University Press 2005Google Scholar
Ibrahim Ibn Nujaym, ‘Umar b.Al-Nahr al-Fā’iq Sharḥ Kanz al-Daqā’iqBeirutDar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya 2002Google Scholar
Fadel, Mohammad H.The True, the Good and the Reasonable: The Theological and Ethical Roots of Public Reason in Islamic LawCanadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 21 2008 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Bernard G.The Spirit of Islamic LawAthens, GAUniversity of Georgia Press 1998Google Scholar
al-Qarafi, Shihab al-Dinal-Umniyya fī Idrāk al-NiyyaQasim al-Falih, Musa‘id b.Maktabat al-HaramaynRiyad 1988Google Scholar
Johansen, BaberTruth and Validity of the Qadi’s Judgment. A Legal Debate among Muslim Sunnite Jurists from the 9th to the 13th centuriesRecht van de Islam 14 1997 1Google Scholar
Fadel, Mohammad 1995
1986
Hamoudi, Haider AlaBaghdad Booksellers, Basra Carpet Merchants, and the Law of God and Man: Legal Pluralism and the Contemporary Muslim ExperienceBerkeley Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Law 1 2008 1Google Scholar
1994
Esposito, John L.Women in Muslim Family LawSyracuse, NYSyracuse University Press 2001Google Scholar
El Alami, Dawoud S.The Marriage Contract in Islamic Law in the Shari’ah and Personal Status Laws of Egypt and MoroccoLondonGraham and Trotman 1992Google Scholar
Nasir, Jamal J.The Status of Women Under Islamic Law and Under Modern Islamic LegislationLondonGraham and Trotman 1994Google Scholar
Pollack, DanielClassical Religious Perspectives of Adoption LawNotre Dame Law Review 79 2004 693Google Scholar
Powers, David S.Law, Society and Culture in the Maghrib, 1300–1500CambridgeCambridge University Press 2009Google Scholar
Abu-Odeh, LamaModernizing Muslim Family Law: The Case of EgyptVanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 37 2004 1043Google Scholar
Fadel, MohammadReinterpreting the Guardian’s Role in the Islamic Contract of Marriage: The Case of the Maliki SchoolJournal of Islamic Law 3 1998 1Google Scholar
Ziadeh, Farhat J.Equality () in the Muslim Law of MarriageAmerican Journal of Comparative Law 6 1957 503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992
1984
Powers, David S.Women and Divorce in the Islamic West: Three CasesHawwa 1 2003 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapoport, YossefMarriage, Money and Divorce in Medieval Islamic SocietyCambridgeCambridge University Press 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muhammad al-Ghazali, Abu Hamid Muhammad b.The Proper Conduct of Marriage in IslamAl-Baz Publishing 1998Google Scholar
1988
‘Ābidīn, IbnḤāshiyat Radd al-MuḥtārCairoMustafa al-Babi al-Halabi 1966Google Scholar
Aḥmad Ibn Rushd, Abū al-Walīd Muḥammad b.al-Bayān wa-l-TaḥṣīlBeirutDar al-Gharb al-Islami 1984Google Scholar
Krämer, GudrunShari’a: Islamic Law in the Contemporary ContextAmanat, AbbasGriffel, FrankStanford, CAStanford University Press 2007Google Scholar
Amin, QasimModernist Islam 1840–1940: A SourcebookKurzman, CharlesOxfordOxford University Press 2002Google Scholar
Zein-ed-Din, NaziraLiberal Islam: A SourcebookKurzman, CharlesOxfordOxford University Press 1998Google Scholar
Abou el Fadl, KhaledSpeaking in God’s Name: Islamic Law, Authority and WomenOxfordOne World Publications 2001Google Scholar
Ali, KeciaSexual Ethics & Islam: Feminist Reflections on Qur’an, Hadith and JurisprudenceOxfordOne World Publications 2006Google Scholar
1997
Fadel, The True, the Good and the Reasonable,” 58 n.234; Andrew F. March, “Islamic Foundations for a Social Contract in Non-Muslim Liberal DemocraciesAmerican Political Science Review 101 2007 235Google Scholar
2004
Fadel, Mohammad H.Public Reason as a Strategy for Principled Reconciliation: The Case of Islamic Law and International Human Rights LawChicago Journal of International Law 8 2007 1Google Scholar
March, Andrew F.Is There a Right to Polygamy? Marriage, Equality and Subsidizing Families in Liberal Public JustificationJournal of Moral Philosophy 8 2011 244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
al-Shatibi, Abu Ishaqal-Muwafaqat fi Usul al-Shari’aCairoal-Maktaba al-Tijariyya al-Kubra 1975Google Scholar
D’Avray, D.S.Medieval Marriage: Symbolism and SocietyOxfordOxford University Press 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, >Elizabeth S.Scott, Robert E.Marriage as a Relational ContractVirginia Law Review 84 1998 1225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C.India: Implementing Sex Equality Through LawChicago Journal of International Law 2 2001 35Google Scholar
Rogerson, CarolThe Canadian Law of Spousal SupportFamily Law Quarterly 38 2004 69Google Scholar
2008
2002
Case, AnneMarriage LicensesMinnesota Law Review 89 2005 1758Google Scholar
Macklem, PatrickMilitant Democracy, Legal Pluralism and the Paradox of Self-DeterminationInternational Journal of Constitutional Law 4 2006 488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1993

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×