Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-888d5979f-t46fd Total loading time: 1.282 Render date: 2021-10-26T13:04:38.940Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Chapter 13 - Future Directives in Sperm Handling for ART

from Part III - Laboratory Handling of Retrieved Sperm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2021

Ashok Agarwal
Affiliation:
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
Ahmad Majzoub
Affiliation:
Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
Sandro C. Esteves
Affiliation:
Andrology & Human Reproduction Clinic, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Get access

Summary

Couple infertility is gradually increasing, and couples unable to conceive naturally are dependent on assisted reproductive techniques (ART). Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) bypasses the natural selection process of sperm in the female reproductive tract, hence sperm-handling techniques are used to select the most suitable sperm for oocyte fertilization. In this chapter we discuss the conventional sperm-processing methods such as swim-up and density gradient centrifugation. Furthermore, advanced techniques such as magnetic-activated cell sorting, microfluidic devices, motile sperm organelle morphology examination, flow cytometry, and zeta potential are presented. We provide an overview of the sperm-handling approach and its outcome in ART. Additionally, we highlight the future sperm-handling techniques such as Raman spectrometry, interferometric phase microscopy, confocal light absorption and scattering spectroscopy, proteomic analysis, and peptide-based selection of sperm.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Sharma, R, Agarwal, A. Spermatogenesis: an overview. In: Zini, A, Ashok, A (eds.) Sperm Chromatin. Springer, New York, 2011, pp. 1944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agarwal, A, Mulgund, A, Hamada, A, Chyatte, MR. A unique view on male infertility around the globe. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2015;13(1):37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sunderam, S, Kissin, DM, Crawford, SB, et al. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance: United States, 2015. MMWR Surveill Summ 2018;67(3):128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tarozzi, N, Nadalini, M, Borini, A. Effect on sperm DNA quality following sperm selection for ART: new insights. Adv Exp Med Biol 2019;1166:169187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henkel, R. Sperm preparation: state-of-the-art: physiological aspects and application of advanced sperm preparation methods. Asian J Androl 2012;14(2):260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tarozzi, N, Nadalini, M, Borini, A. Effect on sperm DNA quality following sperm selection for ART: new insights. In: Baldi, E, Muratori, M (eds.) Genetic Damage in Human Spermatozoa. Springer, New York, 2019, pp. 169187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gangrade, BK, Agarwal, A. Sperm processing and selection techniques in an IVF/ICSI. In: Varghese, AC, Sjoblom, P, Jayaprakasan, K (eds.), A Practical Guide to Setting Up an IVF Lab, Embryo Culture Systems and Running the Unit. JP Medical, London, 2013, pp. 151159.Google Scholar
Muratori, M, Tarozzi, N, Carpentiero, F, et al. Sperm selection with density gradient centrifugation and swim up: effect on DNA fragmentation in viable spermatozoa. Sci Rep 2019;9(1):7492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beydola, T, Sharma, RK, Lee, W, et al. Sperm preparation and selection techniques. In: Rizk, BRMB, Aziz, N, Agarwal, A, Sanbanegh, E (eds.) Male Infertility Practice. Jaypee Brothers, New Delhi, 2013, pp. 244251.Google Scholar
Otsuki, J, Chuko, M, Momma, Y, Takahashi, K, Nagai, Y. A comparison of the swim-up procedure at body and testis temperatures. J Assist Reprod Genet 2008;25(8):413415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agarwal, A, Gupta, S, Sharma, R. Sperm preparation for intrauterine insemination (IUI) by swim-up method. In: Agarwal, A, Gupta, S, Sharma, R (eds.) Andrological Evaluation of Male Infertility. Springer, New York, 2016, pp. 109112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickey, RP, Pyrzak, R, Lu, PY, Taylor, SN, Rye, PH. Comparison of the sperm quality necessary for successful intrauterine insemination with World Health Organization threshold values for normal sperm. Fertil Steril 1999;71(4):684689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Younglai, EV, Holt, D, Brown, P, Jurisicova, A, Casper, RF. Sperm swim-up techniques and DNA fragmentation. Hum Reprod 2001;16(9):19501953.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esteves, SC, Sharma, RK, Thomas, AJ Jr, Agarwal, A. Effect of swim-up sperm washing and subsequent capacitation on acrosome status and functional membrane integrity of normal sperm. Int J Fertil Women Med 2000;45(5):335341.Google ScholarPubMed
Grunewald, S, Paasch, U. Sperm processing and selection. In Parekattil, SJ, Agarwal, A (eds.) Male Infertility: Contemporary Clinical Approaches, Andrology, ART & Antioxidants. Springer, New York, 2012, pp. 423430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malvezzi, H, Sharma, R, Agarwal, A, Abuzenadah, AM, Abu-Elmagd, M. Sperm quality after density gradient centrifugation with three commercially available media: a controlled trial. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2014;12(1):121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agarwal, A, Selvam, MKP. Advanced sperm processing/selection techniques. In: Zini, A, Agarwal, A (eds.) A Clinician’s Guide to Sperm DNA and Chromatin Damage. Springer, New York, 2018, pp. 529543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molday, RS, Yen, SPS, Rembaum, A. Application of magnetic microspheres in labelling and separation of cells. Nature 1977;268(5619):437438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asghar, W, Velasco, V, Kingsley, JL, et al. Selection of functional human sperm with higher DNA integrity and fewer reactive oxygen species. Adv Healthcare Mater 2014;3(10):16711679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nosrati, R, Vollmer, M, Eamer, L, et al. Rapid selection of sperm with high DNA integrity. Lab Chip 2014;14(6):11421150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartoov, B, Berkovitz, A, Eltes, F, et al. Real‐time fine morphology of motile human sperm cells is associated with IVF‐ICSI outcome. J Androl 2002;23(1):18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perdrix, A, Saïdi, R, Ménard, JF, et al. Relationship between conventional sperm parameters and motile sperm organelle morphology examination (MSOME). Int J Androl 2012;35(4):491498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebner, T, Shebl, O, Oppelt, P, Mayer, RB. Some reflections on intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection. Int J Fertil Steril 2014;8(2):105112.Google ScholarPubMed
Mahfouz, RZ, Said, TM, Agarwal, A. The diagnostic and therapeutic applications of flow cytometry in male infertility. Arch Med Sci 2009;5(1A):S99S108.Google Scholar
Suh, TK, Schenk, JL, Seidel, GE Jr., High pressure flow cytometric sorting damages sperm. Theriogenology 2005;64(5):10351048.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Geyter, C, Gobrecht-Keller, U, Ahler, A, Fischer, M. Removal of DNA-fragmented spermatozoa using flow cytometry and sorting does not improve the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Assist Reprod Genet 2019;36(10):20792086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ainsworth, C, Nixon, B, Aitken, RJ. Development of a novel electrophoretic system for the isolation of human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 2005;20(8):22612270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, L, Murphy, K, Aston, KI, et al. Optimization of microelectrophoresis to select highly negatively charged sperm. J Assist Reprod Genet 2016;33(6):679688.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, PJ, Jacobson, JD, Corselli, JU, Patton, WC. A simple zeta method for sperm selection based on membrane charge. Fertil Steril 2006;85(2):481486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kheirollahi-Kouhestani, M, Razavi, S, Tavalaee, M, et al. Selection of sperm based on combined density gradient and zeta method may improve ICSI outcome. Hum Reprod 2009;24(10):24092416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martins, AD, Agarwal, A, Henkel, R. Sperm cryopreservation. In: Nagy, ZP, Varghese, A, Agarwal, A (eds.) In Vitro Fertilization. Springer, New York, 2019, pp. 625642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allamaneni, SS, Agarwal, A, Rama, S, et al. Comparative study on density gradients and swim‐up preparation techniques utilizing neat and cryopreserved spermatozoa. Asian J Androl 2005;7(1):8692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Said, TM, Grunewald, S, Paasch, U, et al. Effects of magnetic-activated cell sorting on sperm motility and cryosurvival rates. Fertil Steril 2005;83(5):14421446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kam, TL, Jacobson, JD, Patton, WC, Corselli, JU, Chan, PJ. Retention of membrane charge attributes by cryopreserved-thawed sperm and zeta selection. J Assist Reprod Genet 2007;24(9):429434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ainsworth, C, Nixon, B, Jansen, RP, Aitken, RJ. First recorded pregnancy and normal birth after ICSI using electrophoretically isolated spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 2006;22(1):197200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karamahmutoglu, H, Erdem, A, Erdem, M, et al. The gradient technique improves success rates in intrauterine insemination cycles of unexplained subfertile couples when compared to swim up technique; a prospective randomized study. J Assist Reprod Genet 2014;31(9):11391145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berg, U, Brucker, C, Berg, FD., Effect of motile sperm count after swim-up on outcome of intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 1997;67(4):747750.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boomsma, CM, Heineman, MJ, Cohlen, BJ, Farquhar, CM. Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;3:CD004507.Google Scholar
Said, TM Land, JA. Effects of advanced selection methods on sperm quality and ART outcome: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2011;17(6):719733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jakab, A, Sakkas, D, Delpiano, E, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a novel selection method for sperm with normal frequency of chromosomal aneuploidies. Fertil Steril 2005;84(6):16651673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parmegiani, L, Cognigni, GE, Bernardi, S, et al. “Physiologic ICSI”: hyaluronic acid (HA) favors selection of spermatozoa without DNA fragmentation and with normal nucleus, resulting in improvement of embryo quality. Fertil Steril 2010;93(2):598604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oehninger, SC, Kotze, D. Sperm binding to the zona pellucida, hyaluronic acid binding assay, and PICSI. In: Agarwal, A, Borges, E Jr., Setti, AS (eds.) Non-Invasive Sperm Selection for In Vitro Fertilization: Novel Concepts and Methods, Springer, New York, 2015, pp. 5968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasr-Esfahani, MH, Razavi, S, Vahdati, AA, Fathi, F, Tavalaee, M. Evaluation of sperm selection procedure based on hyaluronic acid binding ability on ICSI outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet 2008;25(5):197203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avalos-Durán, G, Cañedo-Del Ángel, AME, Rivero-Murillo, J, et al. Physiological ICSI (PICSI) vs. conventional ICSI in couples with male factor: a systematic review. JBRA Assist Reprod 2018;22(2):139.Google ScholarPubMed
Miller, D, Pavitt, S, Sharma, V, et al. Physiological, hyaluronan-selected intracytoplasmic sperm injection for infertility treatment (HABSelect): a parallel, two-group, randomised trial. Lancet 2019;393(10170):416422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parrella, A, Choi, D, Keating, D, Rosenwaks, Z, Palermo, GD. A microfluidic device for selecting the most progressively motile spermatozoa yields a higher rate of euploid embryos. Fertil Steril 2018;110(4):e342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinnasamy, T, Behr, B, Demirci, U. Microfluidic sperm sorting device for selection of functional human sperm for IUI application. Fertil Steril 2016;105(2):e17e18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrella, A, Choi, D, Keating, D, Rosenwaks, Z, Palermo, GD. Effects of the microfluidic chip technique in sperm selection for intracytoplasmic sperm injection for unexplained infertility: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Assist Reprod Genet 2019;36(3):403409.Google Scholar
Knowlton, SM, Sadasivam, M, Tasoglu, S. Microfluidics for sperm research. Trends Biotechnol 2015;33(4):221229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Souza Setti, A, Ferreira, RC, Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga, D, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome versus intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection outcome: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 2010;21(4):450455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Vos, A, Van de Velde, H, Bocken, G, et al. Does intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection improve embryo development? A randomized sibling-oocyte study. Hum Reprod 2013;28(3):617626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duran-Retamal, M, Morris, G, Achilli, C, et al. Live birth and miscarriage rate following intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection vs intracytoplasmic sperm injection: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2019;99:2433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brauchle, E, Schenke‐Layland, K. Raman spectroscopy in biomedicine–non‐invasive in vitro analysis of cells and extracellular matrix components in tissues. Biotechnol J 2013;8(3):288297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, Y, Zhu, Y, Li, Z. Application of Raman spectroscopy in andrology: non-invasive analysis of tissue and single cell. Transl Androl Urol 2014;3(1):125.Google ScholarPubMed
Mirsky, SK, Barnea, I, Levi, M, Greenspan, H, Shaked, NT. Automated analysis of individual sperm cells using stain‐free interferometric phase microscopy and machine learning. Cytometry A 2017;91(9):893900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eravuchira, PJ, Mirsky, SK, Barnea, I, et al. Individual sperm selection by microfluidics integrated with interferometric phase microscopy. Methods 2018;136:152159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Itzkan, I, Qiu, L, Fang, H, et al. Confocal light absorption and scattering spectroscopic microscopy monitors organelles in live cells with no exogenous labels. PNAS 2007;104(44):1725517260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enciso, M, Pieczenik, G, Cohen, J, Wells, D. Development of a novel synthetic oligopeptide for the detection of DNA damage in human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 2012;27(8):22542266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×