Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T05:04:14.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

63 - NUS guidelines for student participation in medical experiments and guidance for students considering participation in medical drug trials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Sue Eckstein
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access

Summary

NUS produced these Guidelines in consultation with the Independent Clinical Research Contractors and the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry following the deaths of two students in the 1980s.

  1. Student participation must be on a truly voluntary basis free from academic or financial pressure.

  2. To ensure the above, no student should undertake experiments for ANY academic or researcher who tutors or lectures that student orwhois involved in their academic assessment.

  3. To ensure the above, payments for participation in experiment should be standardised, in both NHS and private research at rates of payments which compensate the student for expenses and inconvenience. There should be no financial incentive to participate.

  4. A national computerised register of those participating in all experiments should be kept which records incidents of side effect or ill health but which can also be used to identify individuals submitting themselves to a large number of experiments.

  5. College authorities must monitor their own students' participation and tackle the unhealthy concentration of experiment participation among students involved in medical faculties and the associated natural sciences.

  6. At any time a student should be able to free themselves from a previously agreed series of experiments.

  7. Students should not sign documents which indemnify researchers against legal action. The NHS and private research companies should make their own insurance arrangements.

  8. The scientific and medical authorities should indicate clearly the degree of risk involved. Obvious differences can be highlighted between the testing of totally new drugs and those which are already on the market but simply up for certification in the UK.

Type
Chapter
Information
Manual for Research Ethics Committees
Centre of Medical Law and Ethics, King's College London
, pp. 449 - 450
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×