Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T02:47:39.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2011

Lisa Vanhala
Affiliation:
Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, Oxford University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Making Rights a Reality?
Disability Rights Activists and Legal Mobilization
, pp. 273 - 282
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alter, Karen and Vargas, Jeannette. 2000. “Explaining Variation in the Use of European Litigation Strategies: European Community Law and British Gender Equality Policy.” Comparative Political Studies 33(4): 452–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Ellen Ann. 2005. Out of the Closets and Into the Courts: Legal Opportunity Structure and Gay Rights Litigation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
,ARCH Disability Law Centre. 2005. ARCH Celebrating 25 Years. Toronto: ARCH Disability Law Centre.
Armstrong, Sarah. 2003. “Disability Advocacy in the Charter Era.” Journal of Law and Equality 2(1): 33–91.Google Scholar
Barnes, Colin. 2002. “Disability, Policy and Politics.” Policy and Politics 30(3): 311–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Mark. 2002. Anti-Discrimination Law and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Benford, Robert D. and Snow, David A. 2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börzel, Tanja A. and Risse, Thomas. 2000. “When Europe Hits Home: Europeanization and Domestic Change.” European Integration Online Papers 4(15).Google Scholar
Bouwen, Pieter and McCown, Margaret. 2007. “Lobbying versus Litigation: Political and Legal Strategies of Interest Representation in the European Union.” Journal of European Public Policy 14(3): 422–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodie, Ian. 2001. “Interest Group Litigation and the Embedded State: Canada's Court Challenges Program.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 34(2): 357–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Thomas F. 2004. “The European Union and the Diffusion of Disability Rights.” In Levin, Martin A and Shapiro, Martin, eds., Transatlantic Policy-Making in an Age of Austerity: Diversity and Drift. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
Campbell, Jane and Oliver, Mike. 1996. Disability Politics: Understanding our Past, Changing our Future. London: Routledge.
Casserley, Catherine. 2000. “The Disability Discrimination Act: An Overview.” In Cooper, Jeremy, ed., Law, Rights and Disability. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Cichowski, Rachel A. 2007. The European Court, Civil Society and European Integration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cichowski, Rachel and Sweet, Alec Stone. 2003. “Participation, Representative Democracy and the Courts.” In Cain, Bruce E, Dalton, Russell J, and Scarrow, Susan E, eds., Democracy Transformed? Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Colker, Ruth. 2009. When Is Separate Unequal? A Disability Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
,Commission of the European Union, Directorate-General V. 1996. Mainstreaming Disability within EU Employment and Social Policy. Brussels: DG V Services Working Paper.
Curtis, Russell L. and Zurcher, Louis A. 1973. “Stable Resources of Protest Movements: The Multi-Organizational Field.” Social Forces 52(1): 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella and Diani, Mario. 2006. Social Movements: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Diani, Mario and McAdam, Doug. 2003. Social Movements and Networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
,Disability Rights Commission. 2007. DRC Legal Achievements 2000–2007. Manchester: Disability Rights Commission.
,Disability Rights Commission. 2007. Evaluating the Impact of the Disability Rights Commission: Final Report. Manchester: Disability Rights Commission.
Dowding, Keith. 1994. “The Compatibility of Behaviouralism, Rational Choice and ‘New Institutionalism.’” Journal of Theoretical Politics 6(1): 105–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisinger, P. K. 1973. “The Conditions of Protest Behavior in American Cities.” American Political Science Review 67(1): 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endicott, Orville R. “Key Trends in Case Law Pertaining to Supports for Persons with Disabilities.” Unpublished manuscript on file with the author. Toronto.
Engel, David M. and Munger, Frank W. 2003. Rights of Inclusion: Law and Identity in the Life Stories of Americans with Disabilities. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Epp, Charles R. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Epp, Charles R. 1999. “The Two Motifs of ‘Why the “Haves” Come out Ahead’ and its Heirs.” Law and Society Review 33(4): 1089–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Lee and Kobylka, Joseph. 1992. The Supreme Court and Legal Change: Abortion and the Death Penalty. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52(4): 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredman, Sandra. 2002. Discrimination Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Galanter, Marc. 1974. “Why the ‘Haves’ Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” Law and Society Review 9(1): 95–160.Google Scholar
Gamson, William A. and Meyer, David S. 1996. “The Framing of Political Opportunity.” In McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D, and Zald, Mayer N, eds., Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gibson, James. 1978. “Judge's Role Orientations, Attitudes and Decision: An Interactive Model.” American Political Science Review 72(3): 911–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Gooding, Caroline. 2000. “Disability Discrimination Act: From Statute to Practice.” Critical Social Policy 20(4): 533–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Jeff and Jasper, James M. 1999. “Caught in a Winding, Snarling Vine: The Structural Bias of Political Process Theory.” Sociological Forum 14(1): 27–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grewal, Ini, Joy, Sarah, Lewis, Jane, Swales, Kirby, and Woodfield, Kandy. 2002. “Disabled for Life”? Attitudes Towards, and Experiences of, Disability in Britain. London: DWP Research Report No. 148.
Hansford, Thomas G. 2004. “Information Provision, Organizational Constraints, and the Decision to Submit an Amicus Curiae Brief in a US Supreme Court Case.” Political Research Quarterly 57(2): 219–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harlow, Carol and Rawlings, Richard. 1992. Pressure Through Law. London: Routledge.
Herman, Didi. 1994. Rights of Passage: Struggles for Lesbian and Gay Legal Equality. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Heyer, Katharina C. 2002. “The ADA on the Road: Disability Rights in Germany.” Law and Social Inquiry 27(4): 723–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilson, Chris. 2002. “New Social Movements: The Role of Legal Opportunity.” Journal of European Public Policy 9(2): 238–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holyoke, Thomas T. 2003. “Choosing Battlegrounds: Interest Group Lobbying Across Multiple Venues.” Political Research Quarterly 56(3): 325–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Melinda and Ann, LeeBasser, Marks, eds. 1999. Disability, Divers-Ability and Legal Change. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Kelemen, R. Daniel. Forthcoming. The Rise of Adversarial Legalism in Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kirkland, Anna. 2008. “Think of the Hippopotamus: Rights Consciousness in the Fat Acceptance Movement.” Law and Society Review 42(2): 397–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkland, Anna. 2008. Fat Rights: Dilemmas of Difference and Personhood. New York: New York University Press.
Kitschelt, Herbert P. 1986. “Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 16(1): 57–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud. 1999. “Political. Opportunity. Structure. Some Splitting to Balance the Lumping.” Sociological Forum 14(1): 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieger, Linda H. and Carr, K. E. 2003. Backlash against the ADA: Reinterpreting Disability Rights. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 1995. New Social Movements in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Lawrence, Susan E. 1990. The Poor in Court: The Legal Services Program and Supreme Court Decision Making. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lempert, Robert O. 1976. “Mobilizing Private Law: An Introductory Essay.” Law and Society Review 11(2): 173–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James and Goertz, Gary. 2004. “The Possibility Principle: Choosing Negative Cases in Comparative Research.” American Political Science Review 98(4): 653–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malhotra, Ravi A. 2003. “The Duty to Accommodate Unionized Workers with Disabilities in Canada and the United States: A Counter-Hegemonic Approach.” Journal of Law and Equality 2(1): 92–155.Google Scholar
Manfredi, Christopher P. 2004. Feminist Activism in the Supreme Court: Legal Mobilization and the Women's Legal Education and Action Fund. Toronto: University of British Columbia Press.
Manfredi, Christopher P. and Maioni, Antonia. 2002. “Courts and Health Policy: Judicial Policy Making and Publicly Funded Health Care in Canada.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 27(2): 213–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, James G. 1981. “Footnotes to Organizational Change.”Administrative Science Quarterly 26(4): 563–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, James G. and Olsen, Johan P. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.
March, James G. and Olsen, Johan P. 1998. “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders.” International Organization 52(4): 943–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, James G. and Olsen, Johan P. “The Logic of Appropriateness.” ARENA Working Paper 04/09. University of Oslo, Centre for European Studies.
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.
McCann, Michael. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McCarthy, John D. and Zald, Mayer N. 1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.” American Journal of Sociology 82(6): 1212–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McColgan, Aileen. 2005. Discrimination Law: Text, Cases and Materials. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Meister, Joan. 2003. “An Early DAWNing (1985–1994).” In Stienstra, Deborah and Wight-Felske, Aileen, eds., Making Equality: History of Advocacy and Persons with Disabilities in Canada. Concord, ON: Captus Press.
Morag-Levine, Noga. 2003. “Partners No More: Relational Transformation and the Turn to Litigation in Two Conservationist Organizations.” Law and Society Review 37(2): 457–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, F. L. and Allen, Avril. 2001. “Feminists and the Courts: Measuring Success in Interest Group Litigation in Canada,” Canadian Journal of Political Science 34(1): 55–84.Google Scholar
Naples, Nancy. 2003. Feminism and Method: Ethnography, Discourse Analysis and Activist Research. New York: Routledge.
Neufeldt, Aldred H. 2003. “Growth and Evolution of Disability Advocacy in Canada.” In Stienstra, Deborah and Wight-Felske, Aileen, eds., Making Equality: History of Advocacy and Persons with Disabilities in Canada. Concord, ON: Captus Press.
Orren, Karen. 1976. “Standing to Sue: Interest Group Conflict in the Federal Courts.” American Political Science Review 70(3): 723–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Peter, Monteiro, Althea, and Kappel, Bruce. 2003. “People First: The History and the Dream.” In Stienstra, Deborah and Wight-Felske, Aileen, eds., Making Equality: History of Advocacy and Persons with Disabilities in Canada. Concord, ON: Captus Press.
Peters, B. Guy. 2005. Institutional Theory in Political Science: The “New Institutionalism.” London: Continuum Press.
Peters, B. Guy, Pierre, Jon, and King, Desmond. 2000. “The Politics of Path Dependency: Political Conflict in Historical Institutionalism.” Journal of Politics 67(4): 1275–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, Yvonne. 2003. “From Charity to Equality: Canadians with Disabilities Take Their Rightful Place in Canada's Constitution.” In Stienstra, Deborah and Wight-Felske, Aileen, eds., Making Equality: History of Advocacy and Persons with Disabilities in Canada. Concord, ON: Captus Press.
Poulter, Sebastien M. 1998. Ethnicity, Law and Human Rights: The English Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pritchett, C. Herman. 1948. The Roosevelt Court: A Study in Judicial Politics and Values. New York: MacMillan.
,Public Law Project. 2001. Third Party Interventions in Judicial Review: An Action Research Study. London: Public Law Project.
Quinn, Gerard. 1999. “The Human Rights of People with Disabilities under EU Law.” In Alston, P, Bustelo, M, and Heenan, J, eds., The EU and Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rootes, Chris. 1997. “Shaping Collective Action: Structure, Contingency and Knowledge.” In Edmondson, Ricca, ed., The Political Context of Collective Action: Power, Argumentation and Democracy. London: Routledge.
Rubin, Eva R. 1987. Abortion, Politics and the Courts. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Rucht, Dieter. 2005. “Movement Allies, Adversaries and Third Parties.” In Snow, David A, Soule, Sarah A, and Kriesi, Hanspeter, eds., The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Segal, Jeffrey A. and Spaeth, Harold J. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Shakespeare, Tom, ed. 1998. The Disability Reader. New York: Continuum.
Shakespeare, Tom. 2006. Disability Rights and Wrongs. London: Routledge.
Sikkink, Kathryn. 2005. “Patterns of Dynamic Multilevel Governance and the Insider-Outsider Coalition.” In Della Porta, Donatella and Tarrow, Sidney, eds., Transnational Protest and Global Activism. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
Smith, Miriam. 1998. “Social Movements and Equality Seeking: The Case of Gay Liberation in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 31(2): 285–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Miriam. 2005. “Social Movements and Judicial Empowerment: Courts, Public Policy, and Lesbian and Gay Organizing in Canada.” Politics and Society 33(2): 327–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Miriam. 2008. Political Institutions and Lesbian and Gay Rights in the United States and Canada. London: Routledge.
Snow, David A., Rochford, Jr Burke., Worden, Steven K, and Benford, Robert D. 1986. “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation.” American Sociological Review 51: 464–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solberg, Rorie Spill and Waltenburg, Eric N. 2006. “Why Do Interest Groups Engage the Judiciary? Policy Wishes and Structural Needs.” Social Science Quarterly 87(3): 558–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stienstra, Deborah and Wight-Felske, Aileen. 2003. Making Equality: History of Advocacy and Persons with Disabilities in Canada. Concord, ON: Captus Press.
Waddington, Lisa. 1999. “The European Community's Response to Disability.” In Jones, Melinda and Ann, LeeMarks, Basser, eds., Disability, Divers-ability and Legal Change. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Watters, Colleen. 2003. “History of Advocacy Organizations of the Blind in Canada: Two Stories.” In Stienstra, Deborah and Wight-Felske, Aileen, eds., Making Equality: History of Advocacy and Persons with Disabilities in Canada. Concord, ON: Captus Press.
Wendell, Susan. 2006. “Toward a Feminist Theory of Disability.” In Davis, Lenard J, ed., The Disability Studies Reader. New York: Routledge.
Williams, Bridget, Copestake, Phil, Eversley, John, and Stafford, Bruce. 2008. Experiences and Expectations of Disabled People. London: Office for Disability Issues.
Wilson, Bruce M. and Carlos, JuanCordero, Rodríguez. 2006. “Legal Opportunity Structures and Social Movements: The Effects of Institutional Change on Costa Rican Politics.” Comparative Political Studies 39(3): 325–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wintemute, Robert. 1998. “When Is Pregnancy Discrimination Indirect Sex Discrimination?Industrial Law Journal 27(1): 23–36.Google Scholar
,World Health Organization. 2001. Rethinking Care from the Perspective of Disabled People: Conference Report and Recommendations. Geneva: WHO's Disability and Rehabilitation Team.
Zemans, Frances K. 1983. “Legal Mobilization: The Neglected Role of the Law in the Political System.” American Political Science Review 77(3): 690–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zurcher, Louis A. and Curtis, Russell L. 1973. “A Comparative Analysis of Propositions Describing Social Movement Organizations.” Sociological Quarterly 14(2): 175–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Lisa Vanhala
  • Book: Making Rights a Reality?
  • Online publication: 03 May 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976506.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Lisa Vanhala
  • Book: Making Rights a Reality?
  • Online publication: 03 May 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976506.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Lisa Vanhala
  • Book: Making Rights a Reality?
  • Online publication: 03 May 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976506.007
Available formats
×