Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-vl2kb Total loading time: 0.455 Render date: 2021-12-08T04:53:34.758Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

18 - Deserts, forests and mountains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2011

Michael Bowman
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Peter Davies
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Catherine Redgwell
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

It was hoped that the Rio process would bring about not only a convention conserving biodiversity but also conventions on desertification and forests. From 1975 onwards, the UN, UNEP, and various conferences of concerned international organisations and bodies had drawn attention to the increasingly serious environmental and economic consequences of the expansion of arid lands and destruction of forests, especially tropical forests. Various recommendations emerged from these and were promoted by, inter alia, UNEP, UNESCO, and the FAO, but action lagged until the spread and severity of desertification and rate of destruction of forests led to intensified demands for action. This was inhibited, however, by the insistence of some states that the issues involved fell wholly within their national sovereignty. Thus, although some progress was made on definitional aspects, the goal of concluding conventions on these topics was not attained at UNCED, though Agenda 21 did define and draw attention to desertification, and a non-binding statement of principles relating to forests was adopted. It was not until 1994 that a Convention to Combat Desertification was adopted; to date, no global agreement on binding standards for the protection of forests has been reached.

Agenda 21 also called for regional legal and other instruments to protect fragile mountain ecosystems, with a step in this direction taken the previous year with the conclusion of the 1991 Alps Convention in Europe.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burns, W. C., ‘International Convention to Combat Desertification: Drawing a Line in the Sand’ (1994–5) 16 Mich. J. Int'l L831Google Scholar
Danish, K. W., ‘International Environmental Law and the “Bottom-up” Approach: A Review of the Desertification Convention’ (1995) 3 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud.1Google Scholar
Treves, T., Pineschi, L. and Fodella, A. (eds.), International Law and the Protection of Mountain Areas (Giuffrè Editore, 2002)
Treves, T., Pineschi, L. and Fodella, A. (eds.), Protection of Mountain Areas in International Law: Rio, Johannesburg and Beyond (Giuffrè Editore, 2004)
Sands, P., Principles of International Environmental Law (Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed., 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Managing Fragile Ecosystems: Combating Desertification and Drought’, Agenda 21: Earth's Action Plan (Oceana Publications, 2002)
Tarlock, D., ‘Ecosystems’, in Bodansky, D., Brunnee, J. and Hey, E. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar
,United Nations Environment Programme, Global Environmental Outlook for Deserts (UNEP, 2006)Google Scholar
,Global Drylands Partnership (CIDA, UNSO, UNDP/GEF, IIED, IUCN, WWF, NEF), Biodiversity in Drylands: Challenges and Opportunities for Conservation and Sustainable Use (International Union for the Conservation of Nature, 2004), p. 3Google Scholar
(1993) 23 Environmental Policy and Law43–6
(1993) 23 Environmental Policy and Law202–3
(1994) 24 Environmental Policy and Law36
(1997) 27 Environmental Policy and Law80 and 169
(1998) 28 Environmental Policy and Law46
(2000) 30 Environmental Policy and Law32–3
Bekhechi, M., ‘Une nouvelle étape dans le développement de droit international de l'environnement: la Convention sur la desertification’ (1997) 101 Revue générale de droit international public32Google Scholar
Kassas, M., ‘Desertification: A General Review’ (1995) 30(2) J. of Arid Environments115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayfuse, R., ‘Biological Resources’, in Bodansky, D., Brunnee, J. and Hey, E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford University Press, 2007) 362, at p. 383Google Scholar
Iles, H., ‘The Desertification Convention: A Deeper Focus on Social Aspects of Environmental Degradation’ (1995) 36 Harvard International Law Journal207Google Scholar
(2009) 4(229) Earth Negotiations Bulletin (of the IIED) (5 October 2009)
Tarasofsky, R., The International Forest Regime: Legal and Policy Issues (International Union for the Conservation of Nature, 1995)Google Scholar
König, D., in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), Enforcing International Environmental Standards: Economic Mechanisms as Viable Means (Springer, 1996)
,Canadian Council on International Law, Global Forests and International Environmental Law (CCIL, 1996)Google Scholar
(1983) Australian Law Reports46, 625
,International Union for the Conservation of Nature, A Global Overview of Forest Protected Areas on the World Heritage List (IUCN, 1997)Google Scholar
Sand, P. H., ‘Institution-Building to Assist Compliance with International Environmental Law: Perspectives’ (1996) 56 Zeitschrift für Ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht774Google Scholar
Birnie, P. W., Boyle, A. E. and Redgwell, C. J., International Law and the Environment (Oxford University Press, 3rd ed., 2009), p. 695Google Scholar
Forner, (2007) 16 YBIEL488
Myers, N., ‘The Biodiversity Challenge: Expanded Hot-Spot Analysis’ (1990) 10 Environmentalist243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Operational Program Number 4: Mountain Ecosystems (Global Environmental Facility (IBRD/UNEP/UNDP), 2000)
Price, M. F., ‘The Alpine Convention: A Model for Other Mountain Regions?’ (2000) 20(2) Mountain Research and Development192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pineschi, L., ‘The Compliance Mechanism of the 1991 Convention on the Protection of the Alps and its Protocols’, in Treves, T. et al. (eds.), Non-compliance Procedures and Mechanisms and the Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements (T.M.C. Asser Press, 2009Google Scholar
Fall, J., ‘Designing Framework Conventions to Promote and Support Transboundary Protected Areas: Theory and Practice from the Carpathian Convention’, in Tamburelli, G. (ed.), Biodiversity and Protected Areas: The Evolution of the Italian and Ukrainian Legislation (Giuffrè Editore, 2006)Google Scholar
Samce, E., The Carpathians: Existing Instruments and Programmes and a Background Sector Analysis (United Nations Environment Programme, 2002)Google Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×