Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-7ccbd9845f-z5z76 Total loading time: 1.246 Render date: 2023-01-27T11:13:06.072Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Part I - The Process Is the Punishment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2019

Rosann Greenspan
University of California, Berkeley
Hadar Aviram
University of California, Hastings College of the Law
Jonathan Simon
University of California, Berkeley
Get access


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
The Legal Process and the Promise of Justice
Studies Inspired by the Work of Malcolm Feeley
, pp. 17 - 94
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)



Alexander, M. 2010. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Amsterdam, A. G. 1984. “Clinical Legal Education–A 21st Century Perspective.” Journal of Legal Education 34 (4): 612–18.Google Scholar
Aviram, H. 2011. “Packer in Context: Formalism and Fairness in the Due Process Model.Law & Social Inquiry 36 (1): 237–61.Google Scholar
Aviram, H. 2012. “What Would You Do? Conducting Web-Based Factorial Vignette Surveys.” In Handbook of Survey Methodology for the Social Sciences, edited by Gideon, Lior, 463–73. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Aviram, H. 2013. “Legally Blind: Hyperadversarialsm, Brady Violations, and the Prosecutorial Organizational Culture.” St. John’s Law Review 87 (1): 146.Google Scholar
Aviram, H., Dyer, D., and Thomas, S. C. 2015. “Check, Pleas: Toward a Jurisprudence of Defense Ethics in Plea Bargaining.” Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 41 (4): 775843.Google Scholar
Bedau, H. A. and Radelet, M. L. 1987. “Miscarriages of Justice in Potentially Capital Cases.” Stanford Law Review 40 (1): 21179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bibas, S. 2004. “Plea Bargaining Outside the Shadow of Trial.” Harvard Law Review 117 (8): 2463–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bibas, S. 2012. The Machinery of Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumberg, A. S. 1967a. “The Practice of Law as Confidence Game: Organizational Cooptation of a Profession.” Law & Society Review 1 (2): 1540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumberg, A. S. 1967b. Criminal Justice. Chicago: Quadrangle Books.Google Scholar
Blumberg, A. S. 1969. “Book Review: The Limits of the Criminal Sanction.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 117 (5): 790–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, G. A. 2005. “Preparing a Qualitative Research-Based Dissertation: Lessons Learned.” The Qualitative Report 10 (2): 208–22.Google Scholar
Bugliosi, V. and Gentry, C. 2001 [1974]. Helter Skelter: The True Story of the Manson Murders. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Burke, A. S. 2006. “Improving Prosecutorial Decision Making: Some Lessons of Cognitive Science.” William & Mary Law Review 40: 1587–633.Google Scholar
Burke, A. S. 2007. “Neutralizing Cognitive Bias: An Invitation to Prosecutors.N.Y.U. Law and Liberty Journal 2: 512–30 (symposium).Google Scholar
Burke, A. S. 2010. “Prosecutorial Agnosticism.Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 8: 79100 (symposium).Google Scholar
Butler, J. 2013. “DNA Mixture Interpretation: History, Background, Thresholds, Statistical Methods, and SWGDAM.” New York: National Institute of Standards and Technology, available at: (accessed on July 23, 2015).Google Scholar
Cole, S. A. 2002. Suspect Identities: A History of Fingerprinting and Criminal Identification. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, S. A. 2008. “The ‘Opinionization’ of Fingerprint Evidence.” BioSocieties 3: 105–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, A. J. 2007. Arbitrary Justice: The Power of the American Prosecutor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dershowitz, A. 1996. Reasonable doubts: The OJ Simpson Case and the Criminal Justice System. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, J. and Jacob, H. 1977. Felony Justice: An Organizational Analysis of Criminal Courts. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Emmelman, D. S. 1996. “Trial by Plea Bargain: Case Settlement as a Product of Recursive Decisionmaking.” Law & Society Review 30 (2): 335–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmelman, D. S. 2003. Justice for the Poor: A Study of Criminal Defense Work. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Feeley, M. M. 1973. “Two Models of the Criminal Justice System: An Organizational Perspective.” Law & Society Review 7: 407–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeley, M. M. 1978. “Pleading Guilty in Lower Courts.” Law & Society Review 7: 461–66.Google Scholar
Feeley, M. M. 1979a. “Perspectives on Plea Bargaining.Law & Society Review 13 (2): 199209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeley, M. M. 1979b. The Process is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court. New York: Russel-Sage.Google Scholar
Feeley, M. M. 1982. “Plea Bargaining and the Structure of the Criminal Process.The Justice System Journal 7: 338–54.Google Scholar
Feeley, M. M. 2013 [1983]. Court Reform on Trial: Why Simple Solutions Fail. New York: Quid Pro Quo.Google Scholar
Feeley, M. M. and Simon, J. 1992. “The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and Its Limitations.” Criminology 30 (4): 449–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findley, K. A. and Scott, M. S. 2006. “The Multiple Dimensions of Tunnel Vision in Criminal Cases.” Wisconsin Law Review 2006: 291397.Google Scholar
Fiss, O. 1984. “Against Settlement.” Yale Law Journal 93 (6): 1073–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, J. 1993. “Primary Error Detection and Minimization (PEDMIN) Strategies in Social Cognition: A Reinterpretation of Confirmation Bias Phenomena.Psychological Review 100 (2): 298319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frohmann, L. 1997. “Convictability and Discordant Locales: Reproducing Race, Class, and Gender Ideologies in Prosecutorial Decisionmaking.” Law & Society Review, 31 (3): 531–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanter, M. 1974. “Why the Haves Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change.” Law & Society Review 9 (1): 95160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganzach, Y. and Schul, Y. 1995. “The Influence of Quantity of Information and Goal Framing on Decision.” Acta Psychologica 89: 2336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, J. 1969. “Ideology in Criminal Procedure or a Third ‘Model’ of the Criminal Process.” Yale Law Journal 79 (3): 359417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heumann, M. 1968. Plea Bargaining: The Experiences of Prosecutors, Judges, and Defense Attorneys. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kahan, D. and Braman, D. 2008. “The Self-Defensive Cognition of Self-Defense.” American Criminal Law Review 45 (1): 165.Google Scholar
Kahan, D. 2010. “Culture, Cognition, and Consent: Who Perceives What, and Why, in ‘Acquaintance Rape’ Cases.University of Pennsylvania Law Review 158: 729–98.Google Scholar
Kahan, D., Hoffman, D., and Braman, D. 2009. “Whose Eyes Are You Going to Believe? Scott v. Harris and the Perils of Cognitive Illiberalism.” Harvard Law Review 122 (3): 838904.Google Scholar
Kassin, S. M. and Kiechel, K. M. 2005. “The Social Psychology of False Confessions: Compliance, Internalization, and Confabulation.” Psychological Science 7 (3): 125–28.Google Scholar
Kotkin, M. J. and Rivkin, D. H. 2010. “Clinical Legal Education at a Generational Crossroads: Reflections from Two Boomers.” Clinical Law Review 17: 197.Google Scholar
Klayman, J. 1995. “Variaties of Confirmation Bias.” In Decision Making from a Cognitive Perspective: Advances in Research and Theory, edited by Busemeyer, Jerome and Hastie, Reid, 385418. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kramer, T. H., Buckhout, R., and Eugenio, P. 1990. “Weapon Focus, Arousal, and Eyewitness Memory: Attention Must Be Paid.” Law and Human Behavior 14 (2): 167–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leo, R. 1996. “Miranda’s Revenge: Police Interrogation as a Confidence Game.Law & Society Review 30 (2): 259–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leo, R. 2009. Police Interrogation and American Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Leo, R. and Ofshe, R. 1998. “Consequences of False Confessions: Deprivations of Liberty and Miscarriages of Justice.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 88 (2): 422–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, K. L. 2005. “The New Prosecution.” Wake Forest Law Review 40 (4): 1125–214.Google Scholar
Levine, K. L. 2007. “Can Prosecutors Be Social Workers?Studies in Law, Politics and Society 40: 127–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loftus, E. F. and Hoffman, H. G. 1989. “Misinformation and Memory: The Creation of New Memories.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 118 (1): 100–04.Google ScholarPubMed
Loftus, E. F. 2005. “Planting Misinformation in the Human Mind: A 30-year Investigation of the Malleability of Memory.” Learning and Memory 12: 361–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, S. 2008Constructing a Framework for Criminal Justice Research: Learning from Packer’s Mistakes.New Criminal Law Review 11 (2): 257311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markman, S. J. and Cassell, P. G. 1988. “Protecting the Innocent: A Response to the Bedau-Radelet Study.” Stanford Law Review 41 (1): 121–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, D. 1984. Inside Plea Bargaining: The Language of Negotiation. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBarnet, D. 1981. Conviction: Law, the State, and the Construction of Justice. London: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, L. J. 1988. The Public Defender: The Practice of Law in the Shadows of Repute. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Medwed, D. S. 2009. “The Prosecutor as a Minister of Justice: Preaching to the Unconverted from the Post-Conviction Pulpit.” Washington Law Review 84: 3566.Google Scholar
Medwed, D. S. 2012. Prosecution Complex: America’s Race to Convict and Its Impact on the Innocent. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickerson, R. S. 1998. “Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises.” Review of General Psychology 2 (2): 175220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardulli, P. 1978. The Courtroom Elite: An Organizational Perspective on Criminal Justice. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Packer, H. 1968. The Limits of the Criminal Sanction. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Pfaff, J. F. 2011. “The Micro and Macro Causes of Prison Growth.” Georgia State University Law Review 28 (4): 1237–71.Google Scholar
Pfaff, J. F. 2017. Locked In: The True Causes of Mass Incarceration – And How to Achieve Real Reform. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Robinson, R. 2011. “Does Prosecutorial Experience ‘Balance Out’ a Judge’s Liberal Tendencies?Justice System Journal 32 (2): 146–68.Google Scholar
Shelton, D. 2015. “Closing the Gate on Biased Expert Testimony: The Judicial Perspective.” Paper presented at the annual meeting for the American Academy of Forensic Sciences, Orlando, Florida, February 16–21.Google Scholar
Skolnick, J. 2011 [1968]. Justice Without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democratic Society. New York: Quid Pro.Google Scholar
Simon, D., Stenstrom, D., and Read, S. J. 2009. “Partisanship and Prosecutorial Decisionmaking: An Experiment.” Paper presented at the annual conference for Empirical Legal Studies, Ithaca, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, D. 2012. In Doubt: The Psychology of the Criminal Justice Process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sudnow, D. 1965. “Normal Crimes: Sociological Features of the Penal Code in a Public Defender’s Office.” Social Problems 12 (3): 255–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swisher, K. 2012. “Prosecutorial Conflicts of Interest in Post Conviction Practice.Hofstra Law Review 41 (1): 181215.Google Scholar
Tarrow, S. 1995. “Bridging the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide in Political Science.” American Political Science Review 89 (2): 471–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teichman, D., and Zamir, E. 2013. “Judicial Decisionmaking: A Behavioral Perspective.” In Oxford Handbook of Behavioral Economics and the Law, edited by Zamir, Eyal and Teichman, Doron, 664702. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. I. C. 2014. “Defining Experiential Legal Education.” University of Denver Legal Studies Research Paper no. 14–50, available at: (last accessed July 23, 2015).Google Scholar
Thompson, W. C. 2015. “A Setback for Forensic Science.” The Washington Post, May 8, 2015, available at: setback-for-forensic-science/2015/05/08/540273f2-f350-11e4-84a6-6d7c67c50db0_story.html (last accessed July 23, 2015).Google Scholar
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. 1974. “Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 185 (4157): 1124–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. 1981. “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science 211 (4481): 453–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, G. L. and Bradfield, A. L. 1998. “‘Good, You Identified the Suspect’: Feedback to Eyewitnesses Distorts Their Reports of the Witnessing Experience.” Journal of Applied Psychology 83 (3): 360–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitebread, C. H. and Slobogin, C. 2007. Criminal Procedure: An Analysis of Cases and Concepts. New York: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Wright, R. F. and Levine, K. L. 2015. “The Cure for Young Prosecutor’s Syndrome.” Arizona Law Review 56: 1066–128.Google Scholar


Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)

Connick v. Thompson, 563 U.S. 51 (2011)

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)

Additional Sources

The University of Michigan’s National Registry of Exonerations ( Scholar


Dewey, John. 2013 [1938]. Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. Redditch: Read Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1988. The Later Works of John Dewey, 1925–1953: Essays, Reviews, and Miscellany, 1939–1941. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1924. “Logical Method and Law.” Cornell Law Review 10: 1727.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1922. The Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, Mustafa and Maynard, Douglas W.. 2010. “Pragmatism and Ethnomethodology.” Qualitative Sociology 34: 221–61.Google Scholar
Etzioni, Amitai. 1960. “Two Approaches to Organizational Analysis: A Critique and a Suggestion.” Administrative Science Quarterly 5 (2) (September): 258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm. 1979. The Process Is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm. 1976. “The Concept of Laws in Social Science: A Critique and Notes on an Expanded View.” Law & Society Review 10: 497523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm. 1973. “Two Models of the Criminal Justice System: An Organizational Perspective.” Law and Society Review 7: 407–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foote, Caleb. 1955. “Vagrancy-Type Law and Its Administration.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 104: 603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goluboff, Risa. 2016. Vagrant Nation: Police Power, Constitutional Change, and the Making of the 1960s. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 2012. The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadish, Sanford H. 1968. “The Crisis of Overcriminalization.” American Criminal Law Quarterly 7: 17.Google Scholar
Kohler-Hausmann, Issa. 2017. “Jumping Bunnies and Legal Rules: The Organizational Sociologist and the Legal Scholar Should Be Friends.” In The New Criminal Justice Thinking, edited by Dolovich, Sharon and Natapoff, Alexandra, 246–70. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Livingston, Debra. 1997. “Police Discretion and the Quality of Life in Public Places: Courts, Communities, and the New Policing.” Columbia Law Review 97: 551–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NCJRS. 1967. “Task Force on the Administration of Justice, The Report by the President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice, The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society,” available at (last accessed November 8, 2012).Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 1981. “Gap Problem in the Sociology of Law: A Theoretical Review.” The Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 1: 35.Google Scholar
Pound, Rosco. 1930. Criminal Justice in America. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Seron, Carroll and Silbey, Susan. 2008. “Profession, Science and Culture: An Emergent Canon of Law and Society Research.” In The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society, edited by Sarat, Austin, 3059. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Scott. 2011. Legality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuntz, William. 2011. The Collapse of American Criminal Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978 [1922]. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar


Akers, R. L. 1990. “Rational Choice, Deterrence, and Social Learning Theory in Criminology: The Path Not Taken.” Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 81: 653–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akers, R. L. 2008. “Self-Control and Social Learning Theory.” In Out of control: Assessing the General Theory of Crime, edited by Goode, Erich, 7789. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Akers, R. L. and Lee, G.. 1999. “Age, Social Learning, and Social Bonding in Adolescent Substance Use.” Deviant Behavior 20 (1): 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E. 1997. “Violence and the Inner-City Street Code.” In Violence and Childhood in the Inner City, edited by McCord, Joan, 130.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. 2000. Code of the Street: Decency, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Aronsson, K., Jönsson, L., and Linell, P.. 1987. “The Courtroom Hearing as a Middle Ground: Speech Accommodation by Lawyers and Defendants.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 6 (2): 99115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besemer, S. and Farrington, D. P.. 2012. “Intergenerational Transmission of Criminal Behaviour: Conviction Trajectories of Fathers and Their Children.” European Journal of Criminology 9 (2): 120141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besemer, S., Van der Geest, V., Murray, J., Bijleveld, C. C., and Farrington, D. P.. 2011. “The Relationship Between Parental Imprisonment and Offspring Offending in England and the Netherlands.” British Journal of Criminology 51 (2): 413–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belli, R. F. and Loftus, E. F.. 1996. “Misinformation and the False Memory Problem.” In Remembering Our Past: Studies in Autobiographical Memory, edited by Rubin, David C., 157–79.Google Scholar
Chauhan, P. and Widom, C. S.. 2012. “Childhood Maltreatment and Illicit Drug Use in Middle Adulthood: The Role of Neighborhood Characteristics.” Development and Psychopathology 24 (3): 723–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Currie, J. and Tekin, E.. 2012. “Understanding the Cycle Childhood Maltreatment and Future Crime.” Journal of Human Resources 47 (2): 509–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eckenrode, J., Laird, M., and Doris, J.. 1993. “School Performance and Disciplinary Problems Among Abused and Neglected Children.” Developmental Psychology 29 (1): 5362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, D. S., Wilson, W. J., Huizinga, D., Sampson, R. J., Elliott, A., and Rankin, B.. 1996. “The Effects of Neighborhood Disadvantage On Adolescent Development.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 33 (4): 389426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. W. 2004. “The Environment of Childhood Poverty.” American Psychologist 59 (2): 7792CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, G. W. and Kim, P.. 2013. “Childhood Poverty, Chronic Stress, Self‐Regulation, and Coping.” Child Development Perspectives 7 (1): 4348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrington, D. P. 1997. “Early Prediction of Violent and Non-Violent Youthful Offending.” European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 5 (2): 5166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeley, M. M. 1979. The Process is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Finkelhor, D., Turner, H., Ormrod, R., and Hamby, S. L.. 2009. “Violence, Abuse, and Crime Exposure in a National Sample of Children and Youth.” Pediatrics 124 (5): 1411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frederick, T. J., McCarthy, B., and Hagan, J.. 2013. “Perceived Danger and Offending: Exploring the Links Between Violent Victimization and Street Crime.” Violence and Victims 28 (1): 1635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glueck, S, Glueck, E. 1950. Unraveling Juvenile DelinquencyCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1963. Behavior in Public Places. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Gulley, L. D., Oppenheimer, C. W., and Hankin, B. L.. 2014. “Associations Among Negative Parenting, Attention Bias to Anger, and Social Anxiety Among Youth.” Developmental Psychology 50 (2): 577585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hackman, D. A. and Farah, M. J.. 2009. “Socioeconomic Status and the Developing Brain.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13 (2): 6573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagan, J. and Dinovitzer, R.. 1999. “Collateral Consequences of Imprisonment for Children, Communities, and Prisoners.” Crime and Justice 26: 121–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haney, L. 2013. “Motherhood as Punishment: The Case of Parenting in Prison.” Signs 39 (1): 105–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennigan, K. M., Kolnick, K. A., Vindel, F., and Maxson, C. L.. 2015. “Targeting Youth at Risk for Gang Involvement: Validation of a Gang Risk Assessment to Support Individualized Secondary Prevention.” Children and Youth Services Review 56: 8696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, E. I. and Easterling, B.. 2012. “Understanding Unique Effects of Parental Incarceration on Children: Challenges, Progress, and Recommendations.” Journal of Marriage and Family 74 (2): 342–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, D. and Gabel, K.. 1995. “Incarcerated Parents.” In Children of Incarcerated Parents, edited by Gabel, K. and Johnson, D., 320. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Laird, J. 1981. “An Ecological Approach to Child Welfare.” In Parents of Children in Placement, edited by Sinanoglu, P. A. and Maluccio, A. N., 97132. New York: Child Welfare League of America.Google Scholar
Leventhal, T. and Brooks-Gunn, J.. 2011. “Changes in Neighborhood Poverty from 1990 to 2000 and Youth’s Problem Behaviors.” Developmental Psychology 47 (6): 1680–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCoy, D. C., Roy, A. L., and Raver, C. C.. 2015. “Neighborhood Crime as a Predictor of Individual Differences in Emotional Processing and Regulation.” Developmental Science 19(1): 164–74.Google ScholarPubMed
McLoyd, V. C. 1998. “Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Child Development.” American Psychologist 53 (2): 185-204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, J. and Farrington, D. P.. 2008a. “Parental Imprisonment: Long-Lasting Effects on Boys’ Internalizing Problems Through the Life Course.” Development and Psychopathology 20 (1): 273–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, J. and Farrington, D. P.. 2008b. “The Effects of Parental Imprisonment on Children.” Crime and Justice 37 (1): 133206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, J., Janson, C. G., and Farrington, D. P.. 2007. “Crime in Adult Offspring of Prisoners: A Cross-National Comparison of Two Longitudinal Samples.” Criminal Justice and Behavior 34 (1): 133–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, J., Loeber, R., and Pardini, D.. 2012. “Parental Involvement in the Criminal Justice System and the Development of Youth Theft, Marijuana Use, Depression, and Poor Academic Performance.” Criminology 50 (1): 255302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, D. C. and Farrington, D. P.. 1997. “The Familial Transmission of Criminal Convictions.” Criminology 35 (1): 177202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., and Gannon-Rowley, T.. 2002. “Assessing ‘Neighborhood Effects’: Social Processes and New Directions in Research.” Annual Review of Sociology : 443–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shonk, S. M. and Cicchetti, D.. 2001. “Maltreatment, Competency Deficits, and Risk for Academic and Behavioral Maladjustment.” Developmental Psychology 37 (1): 314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tedeschi, J. T., ed. 2013. Impression Management Theory and Social Psychological Research. Cambridge: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Thornberry, T. P. 2009. “The Apple Doesn’t Fall Far from the Tree (or Does It?): Intergenerational Patterns of Antisocial Behavior – The American Society of Criminology 2008 Sutherland Address.” Criminology 47 (2): 297325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomsich, E., Jennings, W. G., Richards, T. N., Gover, A. R., and Powers, R. A.. 2015. “Childhood Physical Maltreatment and Young Adult Dating Violence: A Propensity Matching Approach.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 3(22): 3475–96Google Scholar
Topalli, V. 2005. “When Being Good Is Bad: An Expansion of Neutralization Theory.” Criminology 43 (3): 797836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turney, K. 2014. “Incarceration and Social Inequality Challenges and Directions for Future Research.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 651 (1): 97101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turney, K. and Haskins, A. R.. 2014. “Falling Behind? Children’s Early Grade Retention After Paternal Incarceration.” Sociology of Education 87 (4): 241–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakefield, S. and Wildeman, C.. 2011. “Mass Imprisonment and Racial Disparities in Childhood Behavioral Problems.” Criminology & Public Policy 10(3): 793817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, D. J. and Farrington, D. P.. 1973. Who Becomes Delinquent? Second Report of the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Wildeman, C. 2010. “Paternal Incarceration and Children’s Physically Aggressive Behaviors: Evidence from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study.” Social Forces 89 (1): 285309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildeman, C., Wakefield, S., and Turney, K.. 2013. “Misidentifying the Effects of Parental Incarceration? A Comment on Johnson and Easterling (2012).” Journal of Marriage and Family 75 (1): 252–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar


Beisner, John H. 2010. US Chamber Inst. for Legal Reform. “The Centre Cannot Hold: The Need for Effective Reform of the U.S. Civil Discovery Process,” at 7, available at Scholar
Bell, Griffen D., Varner, Chilton Davis, and Gottschalk, Hugh Q.. 1992. “Automatic Disclosure in Discovery – The Rush to Reform.” Georgia Law Review 27: 158.Google Scholar
Blaner, Kathleen L., Cortese, Alfred W., and Green, Donald H.. 1998. “Federal Discovery: Crown Jewel or Curse?Litigation 24(4): 865.Google Scholar
Boyd, L. Christina, Hoffman, David A., Obradovic, Zoran, and Ristovski, Kosta. 2013. “Building a Taxonomy of Litigation: Clusters of Causes of Action in Federal Complaints.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 10: 253–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Charles E. and Samenow, Charles U.. 1929. “The Summary Judgment.” Yale Law Journal 38: 423–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denlow, Morton. 1998. “Summary Judgment: Boon or Burden?The Judges’ Journal 37: 2631.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm. 1979. The Process is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Gelbach, Jonah. 2012. “Note: Locking the Doors to Discovery?: Assessing the Effects of Twombly and Iqbal on Access to Discovery.” Yale Law Journal 121: 2270–345.Google Scholar
Gilles, Myriam. 2012. “Procedure in Eclipse: Group-Based Adjudication in a Post-Concepcion Era.” St. Louis Law Journal 56: 1203–29.Google Scholar
Hazelton, L. W. Morgon. 2015. “Quit Your Complaining? Considering the Impact of Supreme Court Decisions on Strategic Litigants.” Unpublished working paper.Google Scholar
Hornby, D. Brock. 2010. “Summary Judgment Without Illusions.” Green Bag 2d 13: 273–88.Google Scholar
Hubbard, H. J. William. 2017. “The Effects of Twombly and Iqbal.Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 14: 474526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Patricia Hatamyar. 2012. “An Updated Quantitative Study of Iqbal’s Impact on 12(b)(6) Motions.” University of Richmond Law Review 46: 603–58.Google Scholar
Moore, Patricia Hatamyar. 2010. “The Tao of Pleading: Do Twombly and Iqbal Matter Empirically.” American University Law Review 59: 553634.Google Scholar
Talesh, Shauhin. 2009. “The Privatization of Public Legal Rights: How Manufacturers Construct the Meaning of Consumer Law.” Law & Society Review 43: 527–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talesh, Shauhin. 2012. “How Dispute Resolution System Design Matters: An Organizational Analysis of Dispute Resolution Structures and Consumer Lemon Laws.” Law & Society Review 46: 463–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talesh, Shauhin. 2013. “How the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead in the Twenty-First Century.DePaul Law Review 62: 519–54.Google Scholar
Talesh, Shauhin. 2014. “Institutional and Political Sources of Legislative Change: Explaining How Private Organizations Influence the Form and Content of Consumer Protection Legislation.” Law & Social Inquiry 39: 9731005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talesh, Shauhin. 2015. “Rule-Intermediaries in Action: How State and Business Stakeholders Influence the Meaning of Consumer Rights in Regulatory Governance Arrangements.” Law & Policy 37: 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Diane P. 2011. “Summary Judgment and the Law of Unintended Consequences.Oklahoma City University Law Review 36: 231–52.Google Scholar
White House signing ceremony, Feb. 18, 2005; transcript and official press release available at Scholar


Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144 (1969).

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, 477 U.S. 242 (1986).

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009).

AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011)

Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007).

Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986).

Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 (1957).

Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, 138 S. Ct. 1612 (2018).

Matsushita Electrical Industrial Corp. v. Zenith Radio, 475 U.S. 574 (1986).

Poller v. CBS, Inc., 368 U.S. 464 (1962).

Shearson/American Express, Inc. v. McMahon, 482 U.S. 220, 232 (1987).

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, 564 U.S. 338 (2011).

American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant, 570 U.S. 228 (2013).


Fed. R. Civ. Pro. Rule 1

Fed. R. Civ. Pro. Rule 8

Fed. R. Civ. Pro. Rule 23

Fed. R. Civ. Pro. Rule 26

Fed R. Civ. Pro. Rule 26(b)(1) 398 U.S. 977, 982 (1970) (amended 2000)


Civil Code § 1793.22(c)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats