Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-5rlvm Total loading time: 0.749 Render date: 2021-10-21T13:05:40.450Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

3 - Process as Intergenerational Punishment

from Part I - The Process Is the Punishment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2019

Rosann Greenspan
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Hadar Aviram
Affiliation:
University of California, Hastings College of the Law
Jonathan Simon
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access

Summary

In The Process is the Punishment, Malcolm Feeley exposed the lower criminal court as a powerful institution in American life, an important counterpart to both the more glamorous federal courts and the more highly charged superior courts that preside over serious crimes within a jurisdiction. Although it typically handles only low-level criminal charges, the lower criminal court’s reach is both broad and deep; in its functioning and process it has the capacity to change the lives of many who come before it – sometimes for the better, sometimes for the worse – irrespective of guilt or innocence, conviction or dismissal.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Legal Process and the Promise of Justice
Studies Inspired by the Work of Malcolm Feeley
, pp. 55 - 71
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akers, R. L. 1990. “Rational Choice, Deterrence, and Social Learning Theory in Criminology: The Path Not Taken.” Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 81: 653–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akers, R. L. 2008. “Self-Control and Social Learning Theory.” In Out of control: Assessing the General Theory of Crime, edited by Goode, Erich, 7789. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Akers, R. L. and Lee, G.. 1999. “Age, Social Learning, and Social Bonding in Adolescent Substance Use.” Deviant Behavior 20 (1): 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E. 1997. “Violence and the Inner-City Street Code.” In Violence and Childhood in the Inner City, edited by McCord, Joan, 130.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. 2000. Code of the Street: Decency, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Aronsson, K., Jönsson, L., and Linell, P.. 1987. “The Courtroom Hearing as a Middle Ground: Speech Accommodation by Lawyers and Defendants.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 6 (2): 99115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besemer, S. and Farrington, D. P.. 2012. “Intergenerational Transmission of Criminal Behaviour: Conviction Trajectories of Fathers and Their Children.” European Journal of Criminology 9 (2): 120141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besemer, S., Van der Geest, V., Murray, J., Bijleveld, C. C., and Farrington, D. P.. 2011. “The Relationship Between Parental Imprisonment and Offspring Offending in England and the Netherlands.” British Journal of Criminology 51 (2): 413–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belli, R. F. and Loftus, E. F.. 1996. “Misinformation and the False Memory Problem.” In Remembering Our Past: Studies in Autobiographical Memory, edited by Rubin, David C., 157–79.Google Scholar
Chauhan, P. and Widom, C. S.. 2012. “Childhood Maltreatment and Illicit Drug Use in Middle Adulthood: The Role of Neighborhood Characteristics.” Development and Psychopathology 24 (3): 723–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Currie, J. and Tekin, E.. 2012. “Understanding the Cycle Childhood Maltreatment and Future Crime.” Journal of Human Resources 47 (2): 509–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eckenrode, J., Laird, M., and Doris, J.. 1993. “School Performance and Disciplinary Problems Among Abused and Neglected Children.” Developmental Psychology 29 (1): 5362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, D. S., Wilson, W. J., Huizinga, D., Sampson, R. J., Elliott, A., and Rankin, B.. 1996. “The Effects of Neighborhood Disadvantage On Adolescent Development.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 33 (4): 389426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. W. 2004. “The Environment of Childhood Poverty.” American Psychologist 59 (2): 7792CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, G. W. and Kim, P.. 2013. “Childhood Poverty, Chronic Stress, Self‐Regulation, and Coping.” Child Development Perspectives 7 (1): 4348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrington, D. P. 1997. “Early Prediction of Violent and Non-Violent Youthful Offending.” European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 5 (2): 5166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeley, M. M. 1979. The Process is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Finkelhor, D., Turner, H., Ormrod, R., and Hamby, S. L.. 2009. “Violence, Abuse, and Crime Exposure in a National Sample of Children and Youth.” Pediatrics 124 (5): 1411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frederick, T. J., McCarthy, B., and Hagan, J.. 2013. “Perceived Danger and Offending: Exploring the Links Between Violent Victimization and Street Crime.” Violence and Victims 28 (1): 1635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glueck, S, Glueck, E. 1950. Unraveling Juvenile DelinquencyCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1963. Behavior in Public Places. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Gulley, L. D., Oppenheimer, C. W., and Hankin, B. L.. 2014. “Associations Among Negative Parenting, Attention Bias to Anger, and Social Anxiety Among Youth.” Developmental Psychology 50 (2): 577585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hackman, D. A. and Farah, M. J.. 2009. “Socioeconomic Status and the Developing Brain.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13 (2): 6573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagan, J. and Dinovitzer, R.. 1999. “Collateral Consequences of Imprisonment for Children, Communities, and Prisoners.” Crime and Justice 26: 121–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haney, L. 2013. “Motherhood as Punishment: The Case of Parenting in Prison.” Signs 39 (1): 105–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennigan, K. M., Kolnick, K. A., Vindel, F., and Maxson, C. L.. 2015. “Targeting Youth at Risk for Gang Involvement: Validation of a Gang Risk Assessment to Support Individualized Secondary Prevention.” Children and Youth Services Review 56: 8696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, E. I. and Easterling, B.. 2012. “Understanding Unique Effects of Parental Incarceration on Children: Challenges, Progress, and Recommendations.” Journal of Marriage and Family 74 (2): 342–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, D. and Gabel, K.. 1995. “Incarcerated Parents.” In Children of Incarcerated Parents, edited by Gabel, K. and Johnson, D., 320. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Laird, J. 1981. “An Ecological Approach to Child Welfare.” In Parents of Children in Placement, edited by Sinanoglu, P. A. and Maluccio, A. N., 97132. New York: Child Welfare League of America.Google Scholar
Leventhal, T. and Brooks-Gunn, J.. 2011. “Changes in Neighborhood Poverty from 1990 to 2000 and Youth’s Problem Behaviors.” Developmental Psychology 47 (6): 1680–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCoy, D. C., Roy, A. L., and Raver, C. C.. 2015. “Neighborhood Crime as a Predictor of Individual Differences in Emotional Processing and Regulation.” Developmental Science 19(1): 164–74.Google ScholarPubMed
McLoyd, V. C. 1998. “Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Child Development.” American Psychologist 53 (2): 185-204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, J. and Farrington, D. P.. 2008a. “Parental Imprisonment: Long-Lasting Effects on Boys’ Internalizing Problems Through the Life Course.” Development and Psychopathology 20 (1): 273–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, J. and Farrington, D. P.. 2008b. “The Effects of Parental Imprisonment on Children.” Crime and Justice 37 (1): 133206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, J., Janson, C. G., and Farrington, D. P.. 2007. “Crime in Adult Offspring of Prisoners: A Cross-National Comparison of Two Longitudinal Samples.” Criminal Justice and Behavior 34 (1): 133–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, J., Loeber, R., and Pardini, D.. 2012. “Parental Involvement in the Criminal Justice System and the Development of Youth Theft, Marijuana Use, Depression, and Poor Academic Performance.” Criminology 50 (1): 255302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, D. C. and Farrington, D. P.. 1997. “The Familial Transmission of Criminal Convictions.” Criminology 35 (1): 177202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., and Gannon-Rowley, T.. 2002. “Assessing ‘Neighborhood Effects’: Social Processes and New Directions in Research.” Annual Review of Sociology : 443–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shonk, S. M. and Cicchetti, D.. 2001. “Maltreatment, Competency Deficits, and Risk for Academic and Behavioral Maladjustment.” Developmental Psychology 37 (1): 314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tedeschi, J. T., ed. 2013. Impression Management Theory and Social Psychological Research. Cambridge: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Thornberry, T. P. 2009. “The Apple Doesn’t Fall Far from the Tree (or Does It?): Intergenerational Patterns of Antisocial Behavior – The American Society of Criminology 2008 Sutherland Address.” Criminology 47 (2): 297325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomsich, E., Jennings, W. G., Richards, T. N., Gover, A. R., and Powers, R. A.. 2015. “Childhood Physical Maltreatment and Young Adult Dating Violence: A Propensity Matching Approach.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 3(22): 3475–96Google Scholar
Topalli, V. 2005. “When Being Good Is Bad: An Expansion of Neutralization Theory.” Criminology 43 (3): 797836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turney, K. 2014. “Incarceration and Social Inequality Challenges and Directions for Future Research.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 651 (1): 97101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turney, K. and Haskins, A. R.. 2014. “Falling Behind? Children’s Early Grade Retention After Paternal Incarceration.” Sociology of Education 87 (4): 241–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakefield, S. and Wildeman, C.. 2011. “Mass Imprisonment and Racial Disparities in Childhood Behavioral Problems.” Criminology & Public Policy 10(3): 793817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, D. J. and Farrington, D. P.. 1973. Who Becomes Delinquent? Second Report of the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Wildeman, C. 2010. “Paternal Incarceration and Children’s Physically Aggressive Behaviors: Evidence from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study.” Social Forces 89 (1): 285309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildeman, C., Wakefield, S., and Turney, K.. 2013. “Misidentifying the Effects of Parental Incarceration? A Comment on Johnson and Easterling (2012).” Journal of Marriage and Family 75 (1): 252–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1
Cited by

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×