Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-pkshj Total loading time: 1.011 Render date: 2021-11-29T05:28:54.288Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2018

Patrick Capps
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Henrik Palmer Olsen
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aalberts, T. Constructing Sovereignty between Politics and Law (London: Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar
Allan, T. R. S. Constitutional Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Allott, P. ‘The Concept of International Law’. European Journal of International Law 10 (1999): 3150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allott, P. The Health of Nations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, P., and Goodman, R.. International Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Alter, K. ‘The New International Courts: A Bird’s Eye View’ (Buffett Center for International and Comparative Studies Working Paper Series No. 09-001, 2009).
Alter, K. The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, K., Helfer, L. and Madsen, M. R.. ‘How Context Shapes the Authority of International Courts’. Law and Contemporary Problems 79 (2016): 136.Google Scholar
Alter, K., Helfer, L. and Madsen, M. R.. ‘The Variable Authority of International Courts’. Law and Contemporary Problems 79 (2016): 1314.Google Scholar
Alvarez, J. E. International Organizations as Lawmakers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Alvik, I., Emberland, M. and Eriksen, C., eds. The New International Law (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2010).Google Scholar
Anghie, A. ‘Angola: A New Cease-Fire – A New Opportunity for Human Rights’. Amnesty International, 5 April 2002. www.amnesty.org.uk/press-releases/angola-new-cease-fire-new-opportunity-human-rights.
Anghie, A. ‘The Evolution of International Law: Colonial and Postcolonial Realities’. Third World Quarterly 27 (2006): 739–53.Google Scholar
Applbaum, A. ‘Legitimacy without the Duty to Obey’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 38 (2010): 215–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arajärvi, N. The Changing Nature of Customary International Law: Methods of Interpreting the Concept of Custom in International Criminal Tribunals (Abingdon: Routledge, 2014).Google Scholar
Arendt, H. Human Condition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958).Google Scholar
Arendt, H. ‘What Is Authority?’ In Between Past and Future, edited by Arendt, H. and Kohn, J. (New York: Penguin Books, 2006).Google Scholar
Armitage, D. Foundations of Modern International Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Austen, J. Persuasion. The World Classics, vol. 356 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. C.Accountability for Violations of International Humanitarian Law and Other Serious Violations of Human Rights.’ In Post-conflict Justice, edited by M. C. Bassiouni, (New York: Transnational, 2002).
Baum, L. Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Beitz, C. The Idea of Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, S. Another Cosmopolitanism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennet, N. ‘Health Concerns Raised over EU-US Trade Deal’. The Lancet 384 (2014): 843–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bentham, J. A Fragment on Government and an Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, edited by W. Harrison, (Oxford: Blackwell, 1967).Google Scholar
Benton, L., and Ford, L.. Rage for Order: The British Empire and the Origins of International Law, 1800–1850 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benvenisti, E., and Downs, G. W.. ‘National Courts, Domestic Democracy, and the Evolution of International Law’. European Journal of International Law 20 (2009): 5972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, M. ‘Two Types of Retributivism’. In The Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law, edited by Duff, R. A. and Green, S. P. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Berman, P. S. Global Legal Pluralism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Berman, P. S.A Pluralist Approach to International Law’. Yale Journal of International Law 32 (2007): 301–29.Google Scholar
Bertea, S. The Normative Claim of Law (Oxford: Hart, 2009).Google Scholar
Besson, S.The Authority of International Law – Lifting the State Veil’. Sydney Law Review 31 (2009): 343–80.Google Scholar
Besson, S.State Consent and Disagreement in International Law Making: Dissolving the Paradox’. Leiden Journal of International Law 29 (2016): 289316.Google Scholar
Besson, S.Theorizing the Sources of International Law’. In The Philosophy of International Law, edited by Besson, S. and Tasioulas, J. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Besson, S., and Tasioulas, J., eds. The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Bibas, S., and Burke-White, W. W.. ‘International Idealism Meets Domestic-Criminal-Procedure Realism’. Duke Law Journal 59 (2010): 637704.Google Scholar
Bingham, T. The Rule of Law (London: Penguin, 2011).Google Scholar
Birnie, P., Boyle, A. and Redgwell, C.. International Environmental Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Bjorge, E. The Evolutionary Interpretation of Treaties (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodansky, D.The Concept of Legitimacy in International Law’. In Legitimacy in International Law, edited by Wolfrum, R. and Roben, V. (Heidelberg: Springer, 2008).Google Scholar
Bodansky, D.Non Liquet and the Incompleteness of International Law’. In International Law, the International Court of Justice and Nuclear Weapons, edited by de Chazournes, L. and Sands, P. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Borgwardt, E. A New Deal for the World: America’s Vision for Human Rights (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucher, D., and Kelly, P. J., eds. The Social Contract from Hobbes to Rawls (Abingdon: Routledge, 2005).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P.Authorized Language: The Social Conditions for the Effectiveness of Ritual Discourse’. In Language and Symbolic Power, edited by P. Bourdieu, , translated by G. Raymond and M. Adamson (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. Entwurf einer Theorie der Praxis (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1996).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P.The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field’. Hastings Law Journal 38 (1987): 814–53.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. The Logic of Practice (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. Sozialer Sinn. Kritik der theoretischen Vernunft (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1987).Google Scholar
Boyle, A., and Chinkin, C.. The Making of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Brandom, R.Some Pragmatist Themes in Hegel’s Idealism: Negotiation and Administration in Hegel’s Account of the Structure and Content of Conceptual Norms’. European Journal of Philosophy 7 (1999): 164–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlie, I. The Rule of Law in International Affairs: International Law at the Fiftieth Anniversary of the United Nations (Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1998).Google Scholar
Brudner, A. Constitutional Goods (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Brudner, A. The Unity of the Common Law: Studies in Hegelian Jurisprudence (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Brunée, J., and Toope, S. J.. Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRef
Buchanan, A. The Heart of Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, A. Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Buckle, S. Natural Law and the Theory of Property: Grotius to Hume (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Byers, M. Custom, Power, and the Power of Rules: International Relations and Customary International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çali, B. The Authority of International Law: Obedience, Respect and Rebuttal (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capps, P. Human Dignity and the Foundations of International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2009).Google Scholar
Capps, P. ‘Legal Idealism and Global Law’. In Ethical Rationalism and the Law, edited by Capps, P. and Pattinson, S. D. (Oxford: Hart, 2017).Google Scholar
Capps, P. ‘The Rejection of the Universal State’. In Transnational Constitutionalism, edited by N. Tsagourias, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Capps, P., and Rivers, J.. ‘Kant’s Concept of International Law’. Legal Theory 16 (2010): 229–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruba, et al., ‘Judicial Behavior under Political Constraints: Evidence from the European Court of Justice’. American Political Science Review 102 (2008): 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carty, A. The Decay of International Law: A Reappraisal of the Limits of Legal Imagination in International Affairs (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Cassese, A., ed. Realizing Utopia (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charney, J. I.Universal International Law’. American Journal of International Law 83 (1993): 523–53.Google Scholar
Chehtman, A. The Philosophical Foundations of Extraterritorial Punishment (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, T. ‘Authority’. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2013 ed., edited by Zalta, E. N.. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/authority/.Google Scholar
Christiano, T. ‘The Authority of Democracy’. Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (2004): 266–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, T. ‘The Legitimacy of International Institutions’. In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Law, edited by Marmor, A. (New York: Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar
Christoffersen, J. Fair Balance: A Study of Proportionality, Subsidiarity and Primarity in the European Convention on Human Rights (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christoffersen, J., and Madsen, M. R., eds. The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. An Essay on Metaphysics (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1940).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. An Essay on Philosophical Method (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1933).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. The New Leviathan or Man, Society, Civilization and Barbarism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1942).Google Scholar
Collins, R. ‘Classical Legal Positivism in International Law Revisited’. In International Legal Positivism in a Post-Modern World, edited by Kammerhofer, J. and d’Aspremont, J. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Collins, R. The Institutional Problem in Modern International Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2016).Google Scholar
Collins, R. ‘Mapping the Terrain of Institutional “Lawmaking”: Form and Function in International Law’. In The Actors of Postnational Rule-Making: Contemporary Challenges of European and International Law, edited by Fahey, E. (Abingdon: Routledge, 2015).Google Scholar
Collins, R. ‘No Longer at the Vanishing Point? International Law and the Analytical Tradition in Jurisprudence’. Jurisprudence 5 (2014): 265–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Combacau, J., and Sur, S.. Droit International Public (Paris: Montchrestien, 2010).Google Scholar
Coşeriu, E. Synchronie, Diachronie und Geschichte. Das Problem des Sprachwandels (München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1974).Google Scholar
Cover, R. M.The Folktales of Justice: Tales of Jurisdiction’. Capital University Law Review 14 (1985): 179203.Google Scholar
Cover, R. M.Nomos and Narrative’. Harvard Law Review 97 (1983): 468.Google Scholar
Craig, P., and de Burca, G.. EU Law: Texts, Cases and Materials, 5th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J. The Creation of States in International Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J.The Problems of Legitimacy Speak’. Proceedings of the American Society of International Law 98 (2004): 271.Google Scholar
d’Aspremont, J. Formalism and the Sources of International Law: A Theory of the Ascertainment of Legal Rules (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d’Aspremont, J. Participants in the International Legal System: Multiple Perspectives on Non-state Actors in International Law (London: Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar
Dai, X. ‘Why Comply? The Domestic Constituency Mechanism’. International Organization 59 (2005): 363–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Chazournes, L. B., and Sands, P., eds. International Law, the International Court of Justice and Nuclear Weapons (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
de Goede, M. Speculative Security: The Politics of Pursuing Terrorist Monies (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Goede, M., and Sullivan, G.. ‘The Politics of Security Listing’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space (2015): 6788.Google Scholar
de Sadeleer, N. Environmental Principles: From Political Slogans to Legal Rules (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Sadeleer, N. Implementing the Precautionary Principle (London: Earthscan, 2007).Google Scholar
de Sousa Santos, B. Toward a New Legal Common Sense (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
de Sousa Santos, B., and Rodriguez-Garavito, C., eds. Law and Globalization from Below (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vattel, E. The Law of Nations. Edited by Kapossy, B. and Whitmore, R. (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2008).Google Scholar
DeGuzman, M. ‘Choosing to Prosecute: Expressive Selection at the International Criminal Court’. Michigan Journal of International Law 33 (2012): 265320.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Y., and Garth, B. G.. Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Dezalay, Y., and Madsen, M. R.. ‘The Force of Law and Lawyers: Pierre Bourdieu and the Reflexive Sociology of Law’. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 8 (2012): 433–52.Google Scholar
Domingo, R. The New Global Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dothan, S. Reputation and Judicial Tactics: A Theory of National and International Courts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Doyle, M.The UN Charter – A Global Constitution’. In Ruling the World, edited by Dunoff, J. L. and Trachtmann, J. P. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Drumbl, M. A. ‘The Curious Criminality of Mass Atrocity: Diverse Actors, Multiple Truths, and Plural Responses’ (Washington & Lee Legal Studies Paper No. 2012-33, October 4, 2012). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2156512.
Drumbl, M. A. ‘Juridical and Jurisdictional Disconnects’ (Washington & Lee Public Law Research Paper No. 02-02, 2003).
Dunn, J.Contractualism’. In The History of Political Theory and Other Essays, edited by J. Dunn, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Dunn, J. The History of Political Theory and Other Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Dunoff, J. L., and Trachtmann, J. P., eds. Ruling the World?: Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R. Law’s Empire (Oxford: Hart, 1998).Google Scholar
Dworkin, R.A New Philosophy for International Law’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 41 (2013): 230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R. Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977).Google ScholarPubMed
Dworkin, R.Thirty Years On’. Harvard Law Review 115 (2002): 1655–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. Legality and Legitimacy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, K. The Functions of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, E. Freie Rechtsfindung und freie Rechtswissenschaft. Translated by I. Venzke (Leipzig, 1903). http://www.gleichsatz.de/b-u-t/can/rec/ehrlich1frei.html.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, E. Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law (1913; London: Transaction, 2001).Google Scholar
Engle, K. ‘Anti-impunity and the Turn to Criminal Law in Human Rights’. Cornell Law Review 100 (2015): 10691127.Google Scholar
Eschenburg, T. Über Autorität (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1969).Google Scholar
Estlund, D. Democratic Authority (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Fassbender, J. ‘Rediscovering a Forgotten Constitution: Notes on the Place of the UN Charter in the International Legal Order’. In Ruling the World, edited by Dunoff, J. L. and Trachtman, J. P. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Finnis, J. Natural Law and Natural Rights, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, A., and Liste, P.. ‘Völkerrechtspolitik. Zu Trennung und Verknüpfung von Politik und Recht der Weltgesellschaft’. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 12 (2005): 209–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G. G.The General Principles of International Law considered from the Standpoint of the Rule of Law’. Recueil des Cours 92 (1957-II): 1227.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M. ‘Third Parties and the Law of Treaties’. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 6 (2002): 37137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanders, C. ‘Toward a Theory of Persuasive Authority’. Oklahoma Law Review 62 (2009): 5588.Google Scholar
Flathman, R. E. The Practice of Political Authority: Authority and the Authoritative (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Franck, T. Fairness in International Law and Institutions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Franck, T. ‘Lessons of Kosovo’. American Journal of International Law 93 (1999): 857–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrichs, J. ‘The Neomedieval Renaissance: Global Governance and International Law in the New Middle Ages’. In Governance and International Legal Theory, edited by Dekker, I. F. and Werner, W. G. (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2004).Google Scholar
Fuller, L. L. The Morality of Law, rev. ed. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Gardbaum, S. ‘Human Rights and International Constitutionalism’. In Ruling the World, edited by Dunoff, J. L. and Trachtman, J. P. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Gardner, J. Law as a Leap of Faith (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Geuss, R. Philosophy and Real Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geuss, R. Public Goods, Private Goods (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Giddens, A. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis (London: Macmillan, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillroy, J. M. The Assent of Public Order Principles in International Law: Philosophical Method, G. W. F. Hegel and Legal Right through Recognition (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, forthcoming).
Gillroy, J. M. An Evolutionary Paradigm for International Law: Philosophical Method, David Hume and the Essence of Sovereignty (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillroy, J. M. Justice and Nature: Kantian Philosophy, Environmental Policy and the Law (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Gillroy, J. M.Justice-as-Sovereignty: David Hume and the Origins of International Law’. British Year Book of International Law 78 (2008): 429–79.Google Scholar
Gillroy, J. M.Philosophical Policy and International Dispute Settlement: Process Principle and the Ascendance of the WTO’s Concept of Justice’. Journal of International Dispute Settlement 53 (2012): 3.Google Scholar
Glenn, H. P.Persuasive Authority’. McGill Law Journal 32 (1986–87): 261–98.Google Scholar
Godard, O. ‘Social Decision-Making under Conditions of Scientific Controversy’. In Integrating Scientific Expertise into Regulatory Decision-Making, edited by Joerges, C., Ladeur, K.-H. and Vos, E. (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgessellschaft, 1997).Google Scholar
Goldmann, M. ‘Inside Relative Normativity: From Sources to Standard Instruments for the Exercise of International Public Authority’. German Law Journal 9 (2008): 18651908.Google Scholar
Goldmann, M. ‘A Matter of Perspective: Global Governance and the Distinction between Public and Private Authority (and Not Law)’. January 15, 2015. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2260293.
Goldsmith, J. L., and Posner, E. A.. The Limits of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Goodin, R. E.Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 35 (2007): 4068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, L.Legal Obligation and Authority’. In The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, Winter 2012 ed., edited by Zalta, E. N.. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/legal-obligation/.
Grotius, H. On the Law of War and Peace, vol. 1. Translated by G. L. Williams (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1950).Google Scholar
Gur, N.Are Legal Rules Content-Independent Reasons?Problema 5 (2011): 175210.Google Scholar
Guzman, A. T. How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. Between Facts and Norms (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Habermas, J. Between Naturalism and Religion (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Habermas, J. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action (1989; Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Habermas, J. The Postnational Constellation (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Hachez, N., and Wouters, J.. ‘A Glimpse at the Democratic Legitimacy of Private Standards: Assessing the Public Accountability of GLOBALG.A.P’. Journal of International Economic Law 14 (2011): 677710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, R. ‘Our Equivocal Constitutional Guarantees’. Columbia Law Review 39 (1939): 563–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. Language as a Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning (Baltimore: University Park Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., and Hasan, R.. Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Harrison, R. Hobbes, Locke and Confusion’s Masterpiece (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. The Concept of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961).Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. Essays on Bentham (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. Encyclopedia of Philosophical Science V1: Logic. Translated by W. Wallace (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. Encyclopedia of Philosophical Science V3: Philosophy of Mind. Translated by W. Wallace and A. V. Wallace (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. Natural Law. Translated by T. M. Knox (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. Outlines of the Philosophy of Right. Translated by T. M. Knox and S. Houlgate (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. The Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by W. Wallace and A. V. Miller (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. The Philosophy of History. Translated by J. Sibree (New York: Dover, 1956).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. Science of Logic. Translated by A. V. Millers (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1976).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. Werke in 20 Bänden mit Registerband (Frankfurt: Surkamp, 1986).Google Scholar
Held, D. Models of Democracy, 3rd ed. (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Helfer, L. ‘Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: Embeddedness as a Deep Structural Principle of the European Human Rights Regime’. European Journal of International Law 19 (2008): 125–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henkin, L. How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy, 2nd ed. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Hernandez, G. The International Court of Justice and the Judicial Function (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, R. ‘Policy Considerations and the International Judicial Process’. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 17 (1968): 5884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Himma, K. E.Law’s Claim to Legitimate Authority’. In Hart’s Postscript: Essays on the Postscript to the Concept of Law, edited by Coleman, J. (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. De Cive (Whitefish: Kessinger, 2004).Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. Leviathan. Edited by E. Curley, (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1994).Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. Leviathan. Edited by M. Oakeshott, (Oxford: Blackwell, 1957).Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. Writings on Common Law and Hereditary Right, edited by Cromartie, A. and Skinner, Q. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Holmes, O. W.The Path of the Law’. Harvard Law Review 10 (1897): 457–78.Google Scholar
Holtermann, J. v. H.A “Slice of Cheese” – a Deterrence-Based Argument for the International Criminal Court’. Human Rights Review 11 (2010): 289315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hovell, D. ‘Kadi: King-Slayer or King-Maker? The Shifting Allocation of Decision-making Power between the UN Security Council and Courts’. Modern Law Review 79 (2016): 147–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, D. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, 3rd ed. Edited by Selby-Bigge, L. A. and Nidditch, P. H. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Hume, D. A Treatise of Human Nature, 5th ed. Edited by Selby-Bigge, L. A. and Nidditch, P. H. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Hurd, H. ‘Challenging Authority’. Yale Law Journal 101 (1991): 1611–77.Google Scholar
Hurd, H. ‘Expressing Doubts about Expressivism’. University of Chicago Legal Forum 1 (2005): 405–35.Google Scholar
Hurd, H. ‘The International Rule of Law and the Domestic Analogy’. Global Constitutionalism 4 (2015): 365–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, H. ‘The International Rule of Law: Law and the Limits of Politics’. Ethics and International Affairs 28 (2014): 3951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Criminal Court, Office of the Prosecutor, ‘Policy Paper on the Interests of Justice’. September 2007. https://www.icc-cpi.int/NR/rdonlyres/772C95C9-F54D-4321-BF09-73422BB23528/143640/ICCOTPInterestsOfJustice.pdf.
International Law Association, ‘Final Report of the Committee on Formation of Customary (General) International Law’. 2000. http://www.ila-hq.org/download.cfm/docid/A709CDEB-92D6-4CFA-A61C4CA30217F376.
International Law Commission. ‘Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law.’ Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission. UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.682. Geneva, 13 April 2006. http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_l682.pdf.
Jabloner, C. ‘Verrechtlichung und Rechtsdynamik’. Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht 54 (1999): 261–78.Google Scholar
Jansen, N. The Making of Legal Authority (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joerges, C. ‘Good Governance through Comitology’. In Committees: Social Regulation, Law and Politics, edited by Joerges, C. and Vos, E. (Oxford: Hart, 1999).Google Scholar
Joerges, C. ‘Unity in Diversity as Europe’s Vocation and Conflicts Law as Europe’s Constitutional Form’. LSE Europe in Question Discussion Paper No. 28, 2010.
Joerges, C., and Glinski, C., eds. The European Crisis and the Transformation of Transnational Governance: Authoritarian Managerialism versus Democratic Governance (Oxford: Hart, 2014).Google Scholar
Joerges, C., Sand, I. J. and Teubner, G., eds. Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism (Oxford: Hart, 2004).Google Scholar
Joseph, S. ‘Trade Law and Investment Law’. In The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law, edited by Shelton, D. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, J., and d’Aspremont, J., eds. International Legal Positivism in a Postmodern World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. The Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by M. Gregor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Kaul, H.-P.The International Criminal Court: Current Challenges and Perspectives’. Washington University Global Studies Law Review 6.3 (2007): 575–82.Google Scholar
Keller, R. Sprachwandel (Tübingen: Francke, 2003).Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. Law and Peace in International Relations (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1942).Google Scholar
Kendall, S. ‘Commodifying Global Justice: Economies of Accountability at the International Criminal Court’. Journal of International Criminal Justice 13 (2015): 113–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsbury, B. ‘International Courts: Uneven Judicialization in Global Order’. In Cambridge Companion to International Law, edited by Crawford, J. and Koskenniemi, M. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Kingsbury, B. ‘Legal Positivism as Normative Politics: International Society, Balance of Power and Lassa Oppenheim’s Positive International Law’. European Journal of International Law 13 (2002): 401–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsbury, B. ‘The Concept of “Law” in Global Administrative Law’. European Journal of International Law 20 (2009): 2357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirgis, , F. L. Jr. ‘Custom on a Sliding Scale’. American Journal of International Law 81 (1987): 146–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiyani, A. G.Group-Based Differentiation and Local Repression: The Custom and Curse of Selectivity’. Journal of International Criminal Justice 14.4 (2016): 939–57.Google Scholar
Klabbers, J. ‘Institutional Ambivalence by Design: Soft Organizations in International Law’. Nordic Journal of International Law 70 (2001): 403–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klabbers, J. International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klabbers, J. ‘The Redundancy of Soft Law’. Nordic Journal of International Law 65 (1996): 167–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klabbers, J., Peters, A. and Ulfstein, G.. The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koh, H. H.Transnational Legal Process’. Nebraska Law Review 75 (1996): 181207.Google Scholar
Kolb, R. ‘Repères historiques dans l’évolution de l’occupation de guerre’. The Global Community: Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence (2007): 65102.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. ‘Between Commitment and Cynicism: Outline for a Theory of International Law as Practice’. In Collection of Essays by Legal Advisrers of States, Legal Advisers of International Organizations and Practitioners in the Field of International Law, edited by United Nations (New York: United Nations Publication, 1999).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. ‘The Fate of Public International Law: Between Technique and Politics’. Modern Law Review 70 (2007): 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. ‘Fragmentation of International Law: Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission’. UN Doc A/CN4/L.682, 2006.
Koskenniemi, M. From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. The Gentle Civilizer of Nations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. ‘International Law: Constitutionalism, Managerialism and the Ethos of Legal Education’. European Journal of Legal Studies 1 (2007): 118.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. ‘Legitimacy, Rights and Ideology: Notes towards a Critique of the New Moral Internationalism’. Associations: Journal for Legal and Social Theory 7 (2003): 349374.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. ‘Miserable Comforters: International Relations as New Natural Law’. European Journal of International Relations 15 (2009): 395422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. The Politics of International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2011).Google Scholar
Krahmann, E. States, Citizens and the Privatization of Security (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, F. ‘The Limits of Contract’. European Journal of International Law 5 (1994): 465–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krisch, N. Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kron, J. ‘Rwandan Is Convicted in 1994 Killings’. New York Times, 17 November 2011. www.nytimes.com/2011/11/18/world/africa/former-rwandan-mayor-convicted-in-tutsi-massacre.html?_r=0.
Kulovesi, K. The WTO Dispute Settlement System: Challenges of the Environment, Legitimacy and Fragmentation (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2011).Google Scholar
Lewis, D. Conventions: A Philosophical Study (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, C. L., and Elias, O. A.. The Paradox of Consensualism in International Law (Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1998).Google Scholar
Lincoln, B. Authority: Construction and Corrosion (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Llewellyn, K. ‘What Price Contract? An Essay in Perspective’. Yale Law Journal 40 (1931): 704–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeb, J. ‘Talking to the Other Side: Humanitarian Engagement with Armed Non-state Actors in Darfur’. Humanitarian Policy Group Working Paper, 2013, 1–48.
Luban, D. ‘Fairness to Rightness: Jurisdiction, Legality, and the Legitimacy of International Criminal Law’. Georgetown Law Faculty Working Paper, 2008. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1154177.
Luhmann, N. Das Recht der Gesellschaft (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1993).Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. Die Wirtschaft der Gesellschaft (Germany: Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft, 1994).Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. Law as a Social System (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. Legitimation durch Verfahren (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1983).Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. Risk: A Socological Theory (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1993).Google Scholar
Maduro, M. P. We, the Court: The European Court of Justice and the European Economic Constitution (Oxford: Hart, 1998).Google Scholar
Mahoney, P. ‘The Relationship between the Strasbourg Court and the National Courts’. Law Quarterly Review 130 (2014): 568–86.Google Scholar
Martin, M. ‘International Criminal Law: Between Utopian Dreams and Political Realities’. In Rethinking Criminal Law Theory: New Canadian Perspectives in the Philosophy of Domestic, Transnational, and International Criminal Law, edited by Tanguay-Renaud, F. and Stribopoulos, J. (Oxford: Hart, 2011).Google Scholar
Martin, M. Judging Positivism (Oxford: Hart, 2014).Google Scholar
Martin, M. ‘Reflections on Punishment from a Global Perspective: An Exploration of Chehtman’s The Philosophical Foundations of Extraterritorial Punishment’. Criminal Law and Philosophy 8.3 (2014): 693712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mashaw, J. L.Recovering American Administrative Law: Federalist Foundations, 1787–1801’. Yale Law Journal 115 (2006): 12561344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDougal, M. ‘International Law, Power, and Policy: A Contemporary Conception’. Recueil des Cours 82 (1954): 137259.Google Scholar
McDougal, M. Studies in World Public Order (New Haven: Yale University Press 1960).Google Scholar
Mégret, F. ‘The Anxieties of International Criminal Justice’. Leiden Journal of International Law 29 (2016): 197221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meidinger, E. ‘The Administrative Law of Global Private-Public Regulation: The Case of Forestry’. European Journal of International Law 17 (2006): 4787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. Die Abenteuer der Dialektik (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1968).Google Scholar
Merrills, J. ‘International Adjudication and Autonomy’. In International Organizations and the Idea of Autonomy: Institutional Independence in the International Legal Order, edited by Collins, R. and White, N. D. (New York: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Mian, M. ‘The Curious Case of Exclusionary Reasons’. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 15 (2002): 99124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mommsen, T. Römisches Staatsrecht, vol. 3 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Moyn, S. The Last Utopia (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Murphy, C. ‘The Dynamics of Transnational Counter-terrorism Law: Towards a Methodology, Map, and Critique’. In Constitutionalism across Borders in the Struggle against Terrorism, edited by Fabbrini, F. and Jackson, V. (London: Edward Elgar, 2016).Google Scholar
Musielak, H. J., and Schurig, K., eds. Festschrift für Gerhard Kegel (Berlin: Kohlhammer, 1987).Google Scholar
Neff, S. Justice among Nations (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuhouser, F. Rousseau’s Theodicy of Self-Love: Evil, Rationality, and the Drive for Recognition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, D. G.The Rome Statute, Some Reservations Concerning Amnesties, and a Distributive Problem’. American University International Law Review 20.2 (2004): 293357.Google Scholar
Nouwen, S., and Kendell, S.. ‘Representational Practices at the International Criminal Court: The Gap between Juridified and Abstract Victimhood’. Law and Contemporary Problems 76 (2013): 235–62.Google Scholar
Nouwen, S., and Werner, W.. ‘Doing Justice to the Political: The International Criminal Court in Uganda and Sudan’. European Journal of International Law 21 (2011): 941–65.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, M. Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1991).Google Scholar
Olsen, H. P.Fidelity to International Law: On International Law and Politics’. In Ethical Rationalism and the Law, edited by Capps, P. and Pattinson, S. D. (Oxford: Hart, 2017).Google Scholar
Olsen, H. P.International Courts and the Doctrinal Channels of Legal Diplomacy’. Transnational Legal Theory 6 (2015): 661–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, H. P., and Toddington, S.. ‘The End of an Era: Static and Dynamic Interpretation in International Courts’. International Criminal Law Review 14 (2014): 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orakhelashvili, A. Peremptory Norms in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Palma, M. ‘The Possible Contribution of International Civil Society to the Protection of Human Rights’. In Realizing Utopia. The Future of International Law, by A. Cassese, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Pattinson, S. D.The Human Rights Act and the Doctrine of Precedent’. Legal Studies 35 (2015): 142–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, J. Conflicts of Norms in Public International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, J., and Elsig, M.. ‘The Politics of Treaty Interpretation: Variations and Explanations across International Tribunals’. In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, edited by Dunoff, J. L. and Pollack, M. A. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Payandeh, M. ‘The Concept of International Law in the Jurisprudence of H. L. A. Hart’. The European Journal of International Law 21 (2011): 967–91.Google Scholar
Peat, D., and Windsor, M.. ‘Playing the Game of Interpretation: On Meaning and Metaphor in International Law’. In Interpretation in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Pelc, K. ‘The Politics of Precedent in International Law: A Social Network Application’. American Political Science Review 108 (2014): 547–64.Google Scholar
Perry, S. R.Law and Obligation’. American Journal of Jurisprudence 50 (2005): 263–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, S. R.Second Order Reasons, Uncertainty, and Legal Theory’. Southern California Law Review 62 (1989): 913–94.Google Scholar
Peters, A. ‘Compensatory Constitutionalism: The Function and Potential of Fundamental International Norms and Structures’. Leiden Journal of International Law 19 (2006): 579610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, B., and Schaffer, J. K.. ‘The Turn to Authority beyond States’. Transnational Legal Theory 4 (2013): 315–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersmann, E.Human Rights, International Economic Law and “Constitutional Justice”’. European Journal of International Law 19 (2008): 955–60.Google Scholar
Petman, J. ‘Deformalization of International Organizations Law’. In Research Handbook on the Law of International Organizations, edited by Klabbers, J. and Wallendahl, Å. (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011).Google Scholar
Pettit, P. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postema, G. J.Coordination and Convention at the Foundations of the Law’. The Journal of Legal Studies 11 (1982): 165203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postema, G. J.Custom in International Law: A Normative Practice Account’. In The Nature of Customary Law: Legal, Historical, and Philosophical Accounts, edited by Murphy, J. B. and Perreau-Saussine, A. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Postema, G. J.Law’s Autonomy and Public Practical Reason’. In The Autonomy of Law, edited by George, R. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Pound, R. ‘Law in Books and Law in Action’. American Law Review 44 (1910): 1236.Google Scholar
Ragazzi, M. The Concept of International Obligations Omnes, Erga, ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Ratner, S. R. The Thin Justice of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. The Law of Peoples (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Raz, J. ‘Authority, Law and Morality’. Monist 86 (1985): 295324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J. The Authority of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Raz, J. The Authority of Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Raz, J. Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics, rev. ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Raz, J. ‘Legitimate Authority’. In The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality, edited by Raz, J (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Raz, J. The Morality of Freedom (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Raz, J. Practical Reason and Norms (London: Hutchinson, 1975).Google Scholar
Raz, J. ‘The Problem of Authority: Revisiting the Service Conception’. Minnesota Law Review 90 (2006): 1003–44.Google Scholar
Reisman, M. ‘International Lawmaking: A Process of Communication’. American Society of International Law Proceedings 75 (1981): 101–20.Google Scholar
Reisman, M. ‘Unilateral Action and the Transformations of the World Constitutive Process: The Special Problem of Humanitarian Intervention’. European Journal of International Law 11 (2000): 318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivers, J. ‘Proportionality and Variable Intensity of Review’. Cambridge Law Journal 65 (2006): 174207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, A. E.Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation’. American Journal of International Law 95 (2001): 757–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, S. ‘After Government? On Representing Law without the State’. Modern Law Review 68 (2005): 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, D. ‘Inescapable Dyads: Why the ICC Cannot Win’. Leiden Journal of International Law 28 (2015): 323–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roughan, N. Authorities: Conflicts, Cooperation, and Transnational Legal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roughan, N. ‘Mind the Gaps: Authority and Legality in International Law’. European Journal of International Law 27 (2016): 329–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, J. G.International Regimes, Transactions and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order’. International Organization 36 (1982): 379415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rundle, K. Forms Liberate: Reclaiming the Jurisprudence of Lon L. Fuller (Oxford: Hart, 2012).Google Scholar
Sand, I. J.Hybridization, Change and the Expansion of Law’. In Hybrid Forms of Governance, edited by Andersen, Å and Sand, I. J. (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012).Google Scholar
Sandholtz, W. ‘Creating Authority by the Council: The International Criminal Tribunals’. In The UN Security Council and the Politics of International Authority, edited by Cronin, B. and Hurd, I. (Abingdon: Routledge, 2008).Google Scholar
Sassen, S. Territory, Authorities, Rights (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Schachter, O. ‘The Nature and Process of Legal Development in International Society’. In The Structure and Process of International Law: Essays in Legal Philosophy, Doctrine, and Theory, edited by Macdonald, R St. J and Johnston, D. M. ( Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1983).Google Scholar
Schatzki, T. R.Introduction: Practice Theory’. In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, edited by Schatzki, T. R., Knorr, Centina K. and Savigny, von E. (London: Routledge, 2001).Google Scholar
Schauer, F. ‘Authority and Authorities’. Virginia Law Review 94 (2008): 1931.Google Scholar
Scholte, J. A.Civil Society and Democratically Accountable Global Governance’. Government and Opposition 39 (2004): 211–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schöndorf-Haubold, B. ‘The Administration of Information in International Administrative Law: The Example of Interpol’. German Law Journal 9 (2008): 1719–52.Google Scholar
Schrijver, N. The Evolution of Sustainable Development in International Law: Inception, Meaning and Status (Leiden: Nijhoff, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sciaraffa, S. ‘On Conent-Independent Reasons: It’s Not in the Name’. Law and Philosophy 28 (2009): 233–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shany, Y. Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Shany, Y. ‘Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts: A Goal-Based Approach’. American Journal of International Law 106 (2012): 225–70.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. ‘Authority’. In The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law, edited by Coleman, J., Himma, K. and Shapiro, S. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. ‘Hart’s Way Out’. In Hart’s Postscript: Essays on the Postscript to the Concept of Law, edited by Coleman, J. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Shklar, J. N. Legalism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1964).Google Scholar
Simmons, A. J.Associative Political Obligations’. Ethics 106 (1996): 247–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, A. J. Moral Principles and Political Obligations (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Skouteris, T. The Notion of Progress in International Law Discourse (Hague: TMC Asser Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Slaughter, A.-M. A New World Order (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Somek, A. ‘The Concept of “Law” in Global Administrative Law: A Reply to Benedict Kingsbury’. European Journal of International Law 20 (2010): 985–95, esp. 993–94.Google Scholar
Somek, A. ‘The Owl of Minerva: Constitutional Discourse before Its Conclusion’. Modern Law Review 71 (2008): 473–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorel, J. M., and Eveno, V. B.. ‘Article 31’. In The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, edited by Corten, O. and Klein, P. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Stein, E. ‘International Integration and Democracy: No Love at First Sight’. American Journal of International Law 95 (2001): 489534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, R. ‘Remedying Disregard in Global Regulatory Governance: Accountability, Participation, and Responsiveness’. American Journal of International Law 108 (2014): 211–70.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. Globalization and Its Discontents (New York: Norton, 2002).Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, A., and Brunell, T.. ‘Trustee Courts and the Judicialization of International Regimes: The Politics of Majoritarian Activism in the European Convention on Human Rights, the European Union, and the World Trade Organization’. Journal of Law and Courts 1 (2013): 6188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suganami, H. The Domestic Analogy and World Order Proposals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, G., and de Goede, M.. ‘Between Law and the Exception: The UN1267 Ombudsperson as a Hybrid Model of Legal Expertise’. Leiden Journal of International Law 26 (2013): 833–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swart, M. ‘Judicial Lawmaking at the Ad Hoc Tribunals: The Creative Use of the Sources of International Law and “Adventurous Interpretation”’. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 70 (2010): 459.Google Scholar
Tams, C. Enforcing Obligations Erga Omnes in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tasioulas, J. ‘Human Rights, Legitimacy, and International Law’. American Journal of Jurisprudence 58 (2013): 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tasioulas, J. ‘The Legitimacy of International Law’. In The Philosophy of International Law, edited by Besson, S. and Tasioulas, J. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Taylor, C. ‘To Follow a Rule …’ In Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives, edited by Calhoun, C., LiPuma, E. and Postone, M. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Teubner, G. ‘Coincidentia Oppositorum: Hybrid Networks beyond Contract and Organization’. In Networks: Legal Issues of Multilateral Co-operation, edited by Teubner, G. and Amstutz, M. (Oxford, Hart, 2009).Google Scholar
Teubner, G. Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, G. Law as an Autopoietic System (Oxford: Blackwell, 1993).Google Scholar
Teubner, G. ‘Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law’. Law and Society Review 17 (1983): 239–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, C. A. ‘The Uses and Abuses of Legitimacy in International Law’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 34 (2014): 729–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornhill, C. A Sociology of Constitutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomuschat, C. Human Rights: Between Idealism and Realism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Torrance, M. ‘Persuasive Authority beyond the State: A Theoretical Analysis of Transnational Corporate Social Responsibility Norms as Legal Reasons within Positive Legal Systems’. German Law Journal 12 (2011): 15731636.Google Scholar
Tucker, A. ‘The Limits of Razian Authority’. Res Publica 18 (2012): 225–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuori, K., Maduro, M. and Sankari, S.. Transnational Law. Rethinking European Law and Legal Thinking (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).
v. Gestel, R., Micklitz, H. W. and Maduro, M. P.. ‘Methodology in the New Legal World’. European University Institute Working Paper, 2012, 13.
v. Jhering, R. Der Kampf um’s Recht (1913; Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1948).Google Scholar
v. Wijk, J. ‘Amnesty for War Crimes in Angola: Principled for a Day?International Criminal Law Review 12.4 (2012): 743–61.Google Scholar
van der Vossen, B. ‘Assessing Law’s Claim to Authority’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 31 (2011): 481501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Hoof, G. J. H. Rethinking the Sources of International Law (Deventer: Kluwer, 1983).Google Scholar
van Mulligen, A. ‘Framing Deformalisation in International Law’. Transnational Legal Theory 3–4 (2015): 635–60.Google Scholar
Venzke, I. ‘Between Power and Persuasion: On International Institutions’ Authority in Making Law’. Transnational Legal Theory 4 (2013): 354–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venzke, I. How Interpretation Makes International Law: On Semantic Change and Normative Twists (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Venzke, I. ‘Is Interpretation in International Law a Game?’ In Interpretation in International Law, edited by Bianchi, A. et al. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Venzke, I. ‘Legal Contestation about “Enemy Combatants”: On the Exercise of Power in Legal Interpretation’. Journal of International Law & International Relations 5 (2009): 155–84.Google Scholar
Venzke, I., and Von Bernstorff, J.. ‘Ethos, Ethics, and Morality in International Relations’. In Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, edited by Wolfrum, R. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Verdirame, G. ‘A Normative Theory of Sovereignty Transfers’. Stanford Journal of International Law 49 (2013): 371424.Google Scholar
Verdirame, G. ‘Rescuing Human Rights from Proportionality’. In Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights, edited by Cruft, R., Liao, S. M. and Renzo, M. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
von Bogdandy, A. ‘Globalization and Europe: How to Square Democracy, Globalization, and International Law’. European Journal of International Law 15 (2004): 885906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Bogdandy, A., Goldmann, M. and Venzke, I.. ‘From Public International Law to International Public Law: Translating World Public Opinion into International Public Authority’. European Journal of International Law 28 (2017): 115–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Bogdandy, A., and Venzke, I.. In Whose Name? A Public Law Theory of International Adjudication (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voyiakis, E. ‘Customary International Law and the Place of Normative Considerations’. American Journal of Jurisprudence 55 (2010): 163200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vulliamy, E., and Hartmann, F.. ‘How Britain and the US Decided to Abandon Srebrenica to Its Fate,’ The Guardian, 4 July 2015. www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jul/04/how-britain-and-us-abandoned-srebrenica-massacre-1995.
Walker, N. ‘Beyond Boundary Disputes and Basic Grids: Mapping the Global Disorder of Normative Orders’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 34 (2008): 373–396.Google Scholar
Weber, M. ‘Der Sinn der “Wertfreiheit” der Soziologischen und Ökonomischen Wissenschaften’. Logos 7 (1917): 40.Google Scholar
Weber, M. Economy and Society. Edited by Roth, G. and Wittich, C. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Weber, M. ‘Politics as a Vocation’. In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, by Weber, M., translated and edited by Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. W. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Wei, D. L. T. ‘Rethinking Erdemović: Beyond the Clash of Laws’. Singapore Law Review 23 (2003): 7184.Google Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H. ‘The Geology of International Law: Governance, Democracy and Legitimacy’. Zeitschrift für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 64 (2004): 547–62.Google Scholar
Wheatley, S. The Democratic Legitimacy of International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2010).Google Scholar
Willaschek, M. ‘Which Imperatives for Right? On the Non-prescriptive Character of Juridical Law in Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals’. In Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays, edited by Timmons, M. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Winkler, M. ‘Die Normativität des Praktischen’. Juristenzeitung 64 (2009): 821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe (Oxford: Blackwell, 1958).Google Scholar
Wolfrum, R. ‘Legitimacy of International Law and the Exercise of Administrative Functions: The Example of the International Seabed Authority, the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) and the International Fisheries Organizations’. German Law Journal 9 (2008): 2039–59.Google Scholar