Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-xrnlw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T14:19:35.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - The titling role of possession

from I - Foundation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Yun-chien Chang
Affiliation:
Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alemán, Mateo 1604. Segunda parte de la vida de Guzmán de Alfarache, atalaya de la vida humana. Lisbon: Pedro Craasbeck.Google Scholar
Anderson, Terry L., and Hill, Peter J. 2002. “Cowboys and Contracts,” Journal of Legal Studies 31:S489S514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Terry L., and Hill, Peter J. 2004. The Not So Wild, Wild West: Property Rights on the Frontier. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arruñada, Benito 2003a. “Property Enforcement as Organized Consent,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 19:401–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arruñada, Benito 2003b. “Vías de acceso al Registro de la Propiedad: La experiencia española.” Revista Crítica de Derecho Inmobiliario 79:3271–89.Google Scholar
Arruñada, Benito 2012. Institutional foundations of impersonal exchange: Theory and policy of contractual registries. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arruñada, Benito Forthcoming. “The Institutions of Roman Markets.” In Dari-Mattiacci, Giuseppe, (ed.), Roman Law and Economics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baird, Douglas G., and Jackson, Thomas H. 1983. “Possession and Ownership: An Examination of the Scope of Article 9,” Stanford Law Review 35:175212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, Douglas G., and Jackson, Thomas H.. 1984. “Information, Uncertainty, and the Transfer of Property,” Journal of Legal Studies 13:299320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balzac, Honoré 1830. Gobseck. Paris: Mame-Delaunay (under the title Les dangers de l'inconduite).Google Scholar
Blackstone, W. 1765–1769. Commentaries on the Laws of England. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Buckland, William Warwick 1912. Elementary Principles of the Roman Private Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Calabresi, Guido and Douglas, Melamed A. 1972. “Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral,” Harvard Law Review 85:1089–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caruso, Peter J. II 2000. “To Buy or Not to Buy: Protecting Yourself from Stolen Art,” Arts Editor, August (artseditor.com, accessed July 13, 2013).Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost,” Journal of Law and Economics 3:144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demsetz, Harold 1998. “Property Rights.” In Newman, Peter (ed.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, 3:144–55. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Diamond, Arthur S. [1951] 1975. The Evolution of Law and Order. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. 1998. “Possession.” In Newman, Peter (ed.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, 3:6268. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fernández del Pozo, Luis 2004. El registro de bienes muebles: Los bienes muebles y la preferencia registral de los derechos inscritos. Madrid: Marcial Pons.Google Scholar
Gaius 170. The Institutes of Gaius. Translation, Poste, Edward. Revision, Whittuck, E.A.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1904.Google Scholar
Hansmann, Henry and Kraakman, Reinier 2002. “Property, Contract, and Verification: The Numerus Clausus Problem and the Divisibility of Rights,” Journal of Legal Studies 31:S373S420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holdsworth, William S. [1927] 1977. An Historical Introduction to the Land Law. Aalen: Scientia.Google Scholar
Honoré, Anthony Maurice 1989. “Conveyances of Land and Professional Standards in the Later Empire.” In Birks, Peter Goodwin, (ed.) New Perspectives in the Roman Law of Property: Essays for Barry Nicholas, 137–52. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kötz, Hein 1992. “Rights of Third Parties: Third Party Beneficiaries and Assignment.” In von Mehren, Arthur, (chief ed.) Contracts in General, chap. 13. vol. 7 in International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law. Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Landes, William M. and Posner, Richard A. 1996. “The Economics of Legal Disputes Over the Ownership of Works of Art and Other Collectibles.” In Ginsburgh, Victor A. and Menger, Pierre-Michel, (eds.) Economics of the Arts: Selected Essays, 177220. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Manning, Joe G. 1995. “Demotic Egyptian Instruments of Transfer as Evidence for Private Ownership of Real Property,” Chicago-Kent Law Review 71:237–68.Google Scholar
Medina, Barak 2003. “Augmenting the Value of Ownership By Protecting It Only Partially: The ‘Market-Overt’ Rule Revisited,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 19:343–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Méndez González, Fernando P. 2007. “La inscripción como título valor o el valor de la inscripción como título.” Revista Crítica de Derecho Inmobiliario 83:2059–164.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W. and Smith, Henry E. 2001a. “What Happened to Property in Law and Economics?Yale Law Journal 111:357–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W., and Smith, Henry E. 2001b. “The Property/Contract Interface.” Columbia Law Review 101:773852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merryman, John Henry 2008. “The Good Faith Acquisition of Stolen Art.” In Jackson, John, Langer, Maximo, and Tillers, Peter, (eds.) Crime, Procedure and Evidence in a Comparative Context: Essays in Honour of Professor Mirjan Damaska, 275–94. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Meyer, Elizabeth A. 2004. Legitimacy and Law in the Roman World: Tabulae in Roman Belief and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholas, Barry [1962] 2010. An Introduction to Roman Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass C. and Thomas, Robert P. 1973. The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass C., Wallis, John Joseph, and Weingast, Barry R. 2009. Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver y Esteller, Bienvenido. 1892. Derecho inmobiliario español: Exposición fundamental y sistemática de la Ley Hipotecaria, vol. 1. Madrid: Sucesores de Rivadeneyra.Google Scholar
Patault, Anne-Marie 1989. Introduction historique au droit des biens. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Rose, Carol M. 1985. “Possession as the Origin of Property,” University of Chicago Law Review 52:7388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauveplanne, Jean-Georges 1965. “The Protection of the Bona Fide Purchaser of Corporeal Movables in Comparative Law,” Rabels Zeitschrift 29:651–93.Google Scholar
Silver, Morris 1995. Economic Structures of Antiquity, Contributions in Economics and Economic History 159. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, Alfred William Brian 1986. A History of the Land Law. 2nd rev. edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam [1776] 1981. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Indianapolis: Oxford University Press/Liberty Press.Google Scholar
Steiger, Otto 2006. “Property Economics versus New Institutional Economics: Alternative Foundations of How to Trigger Economic Development,” Journal of Economic Issues 40:183208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallon, Denis 1983. “Civil Law and Commercial Law.” In Zweigert, Konrad, (chief ed.) Specific Contracts, chap. 2. vol. 8 in International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law. Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Weinberg, Harold R. 1980. “Sales Law, Economics, and the Negotiability of Goods,” Journal of Legal Studies 9:569–92.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×