Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-kpmwg Total loading time: 0.304 Render date: 2021-11-27T15:55:58.700Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

4 - The Enduring Problem of World Trade Organization Export Subsidies Rules

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2010

Kyle W. Bagwell
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
George A. Bermann
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Petros C. Mavroidis
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Get access

Summary

This chapter examines the World Trade Organization (WTO) rules and decisions concerning export subsidies in the nonagricultural context to determine why these disputes are so prevalent and contentious and whether the rules or their interpretation should be altered. It discusses the basic economic case against export subsidies and political economy explanations for their continued use. It then reviews two central concerns about the WTO rules on export subsidies. First, it examines issues surrounding identification of export subsidies, including defining what constitutes a subsidy, distinguishing export subsidies from other types of subsidies, and how closely the WTO should review domestic policies for potential (rather than actual) export subsidies. Second, it discusses the difficulty the WTO has had in finding an appropriate remedy for violations of the prohibition against export subsidies. It argues that existing WTO rules do not adequately address either set of issues. In particular, Panels and the Appellate Body should adopt a more appropriate level of penalty for the use of export subsidies, such as tying the level of penalty to the adverse trade effects from the subsidy.

Introduction

Export subsidies have been at the center of a long series of high-profile disputes at the WTO. For example, in the 1990s, Canada and Brazil initiated reciprocal complaints that each gave subsidies for the export of domestically made regional aircraft. A number of countries challenged the United States over its rules for “foreign sales corporations.”

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bagwell, K., Mavroidis, P. C., and Staiger, R. W.. 2002. “It Is All About Market Access.” American Journal of International Law 96:56–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagwell, K., and Staiger, R. W.. 2006. “Will International Rules on Subsidies Disrupt the World Trading System?American Economic Review 96:877–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brander, J., and Spencer, B.. 1985. “Export Subsidies and International Market Share Rivalry.” Journal of International Economics 18:83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, A. O. 2003. “The Economics of the WTO Rules on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures.” John M. Olin program in Law & Economics Working Papers, No. 186, University of Chicago.
Jackson, John H., The World Trading System (Cambridge, The MIT Press, 1997) at 279Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul and Obstfeld, Maurice, International Economics: Theory and Policy (7th ed.) (Boston, Addison Wesley, 2005), pp. 101–102Google Scholar
Trebilcock, Michael J. and Howse, Robert, The Regulation of International Trade, 3rd ed. (London/New York, Routledge, 2005) at 283Google Scholar
Leitner, Kara and Lester, Simon, “WTO Dispute Settlement from 1995 to 2005 – A Statistical Analysis9 Journal of International Economic Law 2006, 219 at 226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, Donald, “What are Trade Agreements For? Two Conflicting Stories Told by Economists, with a Lesson for Lawyers,” 9(4) Journal of International Economic Law 2006, 951–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brander, James A. and Spencer, Barbara J., “Export Subsidies and International Market Share Rivalry,” 18 Journal of International Economics 1985, p. 83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helpman, Elhanan and Krugman, Paul R., Trade Policy and Market Structure (Cambridge, The MIT Press, 1989) at 83–115Google Scholar
Bagwell, Kyle and Staiger, Robert W., The Economics of the World Trading System (Cambridge, The MIT Press, 2002) at pp. 168–179Google Scholar
Bagwell, Kyle and Staiger, Robert W., “The Role of Export Subsidies When Product Quality Is Unknown,” 27 Journal of International Economics 1989, p. 69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janow, Merit E. and Staiger, Robert W., “Canada – Measures Affecting the Importation of Dairy Products and the Exportation of Milk” in Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C. (Eds.), The WTO Case Law of 2001 (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003) 236 at 247Google Scholar
Cass, Ronald A. and Boltuck, Richard D., “Antidumping and Countervailing-Duty Law: The Mirage of Equitable International Competition” in Bhagwati, Jagdish N. and Hudec, Robert E. (Eds.), Fair Trade and Harmonization. Vol. 2, Legal Analysis: Prerequisites for Free Trade? (Cambridge, The MIT Press, 1996), 351Google Scholar
Janow, Merit E. and Staiger, Robert W., “Canada – Measures Affecting the Importation of Dairy Products and the Exportation of Milk,” in Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C. (Eds.), The WTO Case Law of 2001 (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003), 236 at 242Google Scholar
Kaplow, Louis, “Rules Versus Standards: An Economic Analysis,” 42(3) Duke Law Journal 1992, 557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Andrew and Trebilcock, Michael, “Enforcing WTO Obligations: What Can We Learn from Export Subsidies?10(3) Journal of International Economic Law 2007, 653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trebilcock, Michael J. and Howse, Robert, The Regulation of International Trade, 3rd ed. (London/New York, Routledge, 2005) at 265Google Scholar
Green, A., “Trade Rules and Climate Change Subsidies,” 5(3) World Trade Review 2006, 377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, Karen Halverson, “King Cotton, Developing Countries and the ‘Peace Clause’: The WTO's US Cotton Subsidies Decision,” 9 Journal of International Economic Law 2006, 149 at 164–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trebilcock, Michael J. and Howse, Robert, The Regulation of International Trade, 3rd ed. (London/New York, Routledge, 2005) at 337–339Google Scholar
Clough, Mark, “Subsidies and the WTO Jurisprudence8 International Trade Law and Regulation. 2002, 109Google Scholar
Bénitah, Marc, The Law of Subsidies under the GATT/WTO System (The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 2001)Google Scholar
Jackson, John H., The World Trading System (Cambridge, The MIT Press, 1997) at pp. 296–299Google Scholar
Wilcox, W., “GATT-Based Protectionism and the Definition of a Subsidy16 Boston University International Law Journal 1998, 129Google Scholar
Cross, Karen Halverson, “King Cotton, Developing Countries and the ‘Peace Clause’: The WTO's US Cotton Subsidies Decision9 Journal of International Economic Law 2006, 149 at 170–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bénitah, Marc, The Law of Subsidies under the GATT/WTO System (The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 2001) at pp. 145–146Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert E., “Industrial Subsidies: Tax Treatment of ‘Foreign Sales’ Corporations” in Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich and Pollack, Mark A. (Eds.), Transatlantic Economic Disputes: The EU, the US, and the WTO (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2003), 175 at 201–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,OECD, The Export Credit Arrangement: Achievements and Challenges 1978–1998 (Paris, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1998) at 16–21Google Scholar
Howse, Robert and Neven, Damien J., “Canada – Export Credits and Loan Guarantees for Regional Aircraft (WT/DS222/R: A Comment) in Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C. (Eds.), The WTO Case Law of 2002 (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005) 88 at 96–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sim, Kwan Kiat, “Rethinking the mandatory/discretionary legislation distinction in WTO jurisprudence,” 2 World Trade Review 2003, 33 at 8–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhuiyan, Sharif, “Mandatory and Discretionary Legislation: The Continued Relevance of the Distinction under the WTO,” 5 Journal of International Economic Law 2002, 571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sim, Kwan Kiat, “Rethinking the Mandatory/Discretionary Legislation Distinction in WTO Jurisprudence,” 2 World Trade Review 2003, 33 at 48–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukunaga, Yuka, “Securing Compliance Through the WTO Dispute Settlement System: Implementation of DSB Recommendations,” 9(2) Journal of International Economic Law 2006, 383 at 393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trachtman, Joel, “The WTO Cathedral,” 43(1) Stanford Journal of International Law 2007, 127Google Scholar
Schwartz, Warren and Sykes, Alan O., “The Economic Structure of Renegotiation and Dispute Resolution in the World Trade Organization,” 31 Journal of Legal Studies 2002, S179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronckers, Marco and Broek, Naboth, “Financial Compensation in the WTO: Improving the Remedies of WTO Dispute Settlement,” 8(1) Journal of International Economic Law 2005, 101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelzman, Joseph and Shoham, Amir, “WTO Enforcement Issues,” 7(1) Global Economy Journal 2007, 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goh, Gavin and Ziegler, Andreas R., “Retrospective Remedies in the WTO after Automotive Leather,” 6 Journal of International Economic Law 2003, 545 at 548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goh, Gavin and Ziegler, Andreas R., “Retrospective Remedies in the WTO after Automotive Leather,” 6 Journal of International Economic Law 2003, 545 at 545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goh, Gavin and Ziegler, Andreas R., “Retrospective Remedies in the WTO after Automotive Leather,” 6 Journal of International Economic Law 2003, 545 at 549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulis, Daniel and O'Donnell, Benjamin, “Does Withdraw the Subsidy Mean “Repay the Subsidy”? The Implications of the Howe Leather Case for Firms in Receipt of Government Subsidies,” 6 International Trade Law and Regulation 2000, 168 at 170Google Scholar
Moulis, Daniel and O'Donnell, Benjamin, “Does ‘Withdraw the Subsidy’ Mean “Repay the Subsidy”? The Implications of the Howe Leather Case for Firms in Receipt of Government Subsidies,” 6 International Trade Law and Regulation 2000, 168 at 171Google Scholar
Spamann, Holger, “The Myth of ‘Rebalancing’ Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement Practice,” 9(1) Journal of International Economic Law 2006, 31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howse, Robert and Neven, Damien J., “United States – Tax Treatment for ‘Foreign Sales Corporations’ Recourse to Arbitration by the United States under Article 22.6 of the DSU and Article 4.11 of the SCM Agreement (WT/DS108/ARB) A Comment,” in Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C. (Eds.), The WTO Case Law of 2002 (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005) 36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trebilcock, Michael J. and Howse, Robert, The Regulation of International Trade, 3rd ed. (London/New York, Routledge, 2005) at 272Google Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×