Bailey, Guy, Wikle, Tom, Tillery, Jan, & Sand, Lori. 1996. The linguistic consequences of catastrophic events. In Arnold, Jennifer, Blake, Renée, Davidson, Brad, Schwenter, Scott, & Solomon, Julie (eds.), Sociolinguistic Variation: Data, Theory, and Analysis, 469–485. Selected papers from NWAV-23 at Stanford. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Benson, Erica J. 2003. Folk linguistic perceptions and the mapping of dialect boundaries. American Speech 78(3). 307–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bucholtz, Mary, Bermudez, Nancy, Fung, Victor, Edwards, Lisa, & Vargas, Rosalva. 2007. Hella Nor Cal or Totally So Cal?: The perceptual dialectology of California. Journal of English Linguistics 35(4). 325–352.Google Scholar

CensusViewer-Texas. U.S. Census Bureau. Moonshadow Mobile. Census Viewer. http://censusviewer.com/state/TX. (July 24, 2016).Google Scholar

Central Intelligence Agency. 2017. The World Factbook. Retrieved from www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ks.html#PeopleGoogle Scholar

Cramer, Jennifer. 2010. The effect of borders on the linguistic production and perception of regional identity in Louisville, Kentucky. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois dissertation.Google Scholar

Cramer, Jennifer. 2016. Rural vs. urban: Perception and production of identity in a border city. In Cramer, & Montgomery, (eds.), 27–53.Google Scholar

Cramer, Jennifer & Montgomery, Chris (eds.). 2016. Cityscapes and Perceptual Dialectology: Global Perspectives on Non-linguists Knowledge of the Dialect Landscape. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Cukor-Avila, Patricia & Bailey, Guy. 2017. The effect of small Ns and gaps in contact on panel survey data. In Wagner, Suzanne E. & Buchstaller, Isa (eds.), Panel Studies of Variation and Change. New York: Routledge, 210–45.Google Scholar

Cukor-Avila, Patricia & Jeon, Lisa. 2013. Texas twang and Southern drawl: How Texans perceive regional variation from the Panhandle to the Rio Grande Valley. Paper presented at the American Dialect Society (ADS), Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Cukor-Avila, Patricia, Jeon, Lisa, Rector, Patricia C., Tiwari, Chetan, & Shelton, Zak. 2012. “Texas – It’s like a whole nuther country”: Mapping Texans’ perceptions of dialect variation in the Lone Star state. Texas Linguistics Forum 55. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Symposium about Language and Society, Austin, 10–19. Austin: University of Texas.Google Scholar

ESRI 2016. What is GIS? | GIS.com. http://www.gis.com/content/what-gis (July 24, 2016).Google Scholar

Evans, Betsy. 2011. ‘Seattletonian’ to ‘faux hick’: Perceptions of English in Washington state. American Speech 86. 383–414.Google Scholar

Evans, Betsy. 2016. City talk and country talk: Perceptions of urban and rural English in Washington state. In Cramer, & Montgomery, (eds.), 56–72.Google Scholar

Leghorn, Foghorn. Wikia. http://looneytunes.wikia.com/wiki/Foghorn_Leghorn. (July 24, 2016).Google Scholar

Fought, Carmen. 2002. California students’ perceptions of, you know, regions and dialects? In Long, Daniel & Preston, Dennis R. (eds.), Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology, Vol. 2, 113–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Garrett, Peter, Williams, Angie, & Evans, Betsy. 2005. Accessing social meanings: Values of keywords, values in keywords. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 37. 37–54.Google Scholar

Hartley, Laura C. 1999. A view from the West: Perceptions of U.S. dialects by Oregon residents. In Preston, (ed.), 315–332.Google Scholar

Hartley, Laura C. 2005. The consequences of conflicting stereotypes: Bostonian perceptions of U.S. dialects. American Speech 80. 388–405.Google Scholar

Hartley, Laura C. & Preston, Dennis R..1999. The names of U.S. English: Valley girl, cowboy, Yankee, normal, nasal, & ignorant. In Bex, Tony & Watts, Richard J. (eds.), Standard English: The Widening Debate, 207–238. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hayata, Teruhiro. 1976. An attempt at a family tree for accent in some Korean dialects. Bungaku Kenkyuu 73. 100–126.Google Scholar

Jeon, Lisa. 2013. Drawing boundaries and revealing language attitudes: Mapping perceptions of dialects in Korea. Denton, TX: University of North Texas MA thesis.Google Scholar

Jeon, Lisa. 2014. New ways of analyzing perceptual dialectology data with GIS and R: Investigating factors that influence Koreans’ perception of a standard dialect region. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 43. University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar

Jeon, Lisa. 2016. Unpacking the complex concept of cuteness in South Korea: Dialect perceptions and language attitudes. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation Asia Pacific (NWAV AP) 4. National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi, Taiwan.Google Scholar

Jeon, Lisa & Cukor-Avila, Patricia. 2015. “One country, one language?”: Mapping perceptions of dialects in South Korea. Dialectologia 14. 17–46.Google Scholar

Jeon, Lisa 2016. Urbanicity and language variation and change: Mapping dialect perceptions in and of Seoul. In Cramer, & Montgomery, (eds.), 97–116.Google Scholar

Jeon, Lisa, Cukor-Avila, Patricia, & Rector, Patricia C.. 2013. Mapping dialect perceptions in a variationist framework. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 42. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar

Jeon, Lisa, Cukor-Avila, Patricia, & Tiwari, Chetan. 2015. Analyzing and mapping sociolinguistic data with Geographic Information Systems. Workshop presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 44. University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar

Johnstone, Barbara. 2010. Language and geographical space. In Auer, Peter & Schmidt, Jurgen E. (eds.), Language and Space: An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation, 1–17. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kim, Wan-Jin 1983. Phonological structure of the Korean Language. In Korean National Commission for UNESCO (ed.), The Korean Language, 157–170. Seoul: Si-sa-yong-o-sa.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Lameli, Alfred, Purschke, Christoph, & Kehrein, Roland. 2008. Stimulus und Kognition. Zur Aktivierung mentaler Raumbilder. Linguistik Online 35. 55–86.Google Scholar

Lippi-Green, Rosina. 2012. English with an Accent, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Long, Daniel & Yim, Young-Cheol. 2002. Regional differences in the perception of Korean dialects. In Long, Daniel & Preston, Dennis R. (eds.), Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology, Vol. 2, 249–275. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Montgomery, Chris. 2012. The effect of proximity in perceptual dialectology. Journal of Sociolinguistics 16. 638–668.Google Scholar

Montgomery, Chris. 2016. Perceptual prominence of city-based dialect areas in Great Britain. In Cramer, & Montgomery, (eds.), 185–208.Google Scholar

Montgomery, Chris & Stoeckle, Philippe. 2013. Geographic Information Systems and perceptual dialectology: A method for processing draw-a-map data. Journal of Linguistic Geography 1. 52–85.Google Scholar

Moon, Kyuwon. 2012. Stylistic variation of female call center employees: Negotiating femininity and professionalism in South Korea. Paper presented at NWAV-Asia Pacific II. Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar

Potter, Lloyd. 2016. Demographic characteristics and trends in Texas [PowerPoint slides]. http://osd.texas.gov/Presentations. (July 24, 2016).Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 1981. Perceptual dialectology: Mental maps of United States dialects from a Hawaiian perspective. In Warkentyne, Henry J. (ed.), Methods/Méthodes IV (Papers from the 4th International Conference on Methods in Dialectology), 192–198. University of Victoria, British Columbia.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 1986. Five visions of America. Language in Society 15. 221–240.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 1989. Perceptual dialectology: Nonlinguists’ Views of Areal Linguistics. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 1996. Where the worst English is spoken. In Schneider, Edgar W. (ed.), Focus on the USA: Varieties of English around the World 16, 297–360. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 1999. A Language Attitude Approach to the Perception of Regional Variety. In Preston, (ed.), 359–375.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 2010. Language, people, salience, space: Perceptual dialectology and language regard. Dialectologia 5. 87–131.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 2013. The influence of regard on language variation and change. Journal of Pragmatics 52. 93–104.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. (ed.). 1999. Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. & Howe, George M.. 1987. Computerized studies of mental dialect maps. In Denning, Keith M., Inkelas, Sharon, McNair-Knox, Faye, & Rickford, John (eds.), Variation in Language: NWAV-XV at Stanford, 361–378. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar

Texas Tourism. The Office of the Governor, Economic Development and Tourism. https://www.traveltexas.com/#/ (July 24, 2016).Google Scholar

Valencia, Lila. 2016. Texas demographic trends, characteristics, and projections [PowerPoint slides]. http://osd.texas.gov/Presentations. (July 24, 2016).Google Scholar

Yi, Kigap. 1998. Sonam pangon (Southwest dialects). Sae Kugo Saenghwal (Special Edition on Dialects) 8(4). 95–110.Google Scholar

Yi, Sanggyu. 1998. Tongnam pangon (Southeast dialects). Sae Kugo Saenghwal (Special Edition on Dialects), 8(4). 111–132.Google Scholar

Yi, Sang-ok. 1983. Remarks on tone in Middle Korean. In The Korean National Commission for UNESCO (ed.), The Korean Language. 171–189. Seoul: Si-sa-yong-o-sa.Google Scholar

Agar, Michael. 1996. The Professional Stranger: An Informal Introduction to Ethnography, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Agar, Michael. 2011. Making sense of one other for another: Ethnography as translation. Language & Communication 31(1). 38–47.Google Scholar

Benson, Erica J. 2003. Folk linguistic perceptions and the mapping of dialect boundaries. American Speech 78(3). 307–330.Google Scholar

Bloomfield, Leonard. 1944. Secondary and tertiary responses to language. Language 20. 44–55.Google Scholar

Bucholtz, Mary, Bermudez, Nancy, Fung, Victor, Edwards, Lisa, & Vargas, Rosalva. 2007. Hella nor Cal or totally so Cal?: The perceptual dialectology of California. Journal of English Linguistics 35(4). 325–352.Google Scholar

Bucholtz, Mary, & Hall, Kira. 2005. Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7. 585–614.Google Scholar

Cheshire, Jenny. 1982. Variation in an English Dialect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cramer, Jennifer. 2010. The effect of borders on the linguistic production and perception of regional identity in Louisville, Kentucky. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar

Cramer, Jennifer. 2016a. Contested Southernness: The Linguistic Production and Perception of Identities in the Borderlands. Publication of the American Dialect Society 100. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Cramer, Jennifer. 2016b. Rural vs. urban: Perception and production of identity in a border city. In Cramer, & Montgomery, (eds.), 27–53.Google Scholar

Cramer, Jennifer & Montgomery, Chris (eds.). 2016. Cityscapes and Perceptual Dialectology: Global Perspectives on Non-linguists’ Knowledge of the Dialect Landscape. Language and Social Life 5. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Cukor-Avila, Patricia, Jeon, Lisa, Rector, Patricia C., Tiwari, Chetan, & Shelton, Zac. 2012. “Texas – it’s like a whole nuther country”: Mapping Texans’ perceptions of dialect variation in the Lone Star State. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Symposium about Language and Society – Austin (55), 10–19. Austin, TX: Texas Linguistics Forum.Google Scholar

Duranti, Alessandro. 1997. Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12. 453–476.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41. 87–100.Google Scholar

Evans, Betsy. 2011a. Seattle to Spokane: Mapping perceptions of English in Washington state all responses. http://depts.washington.edu/folkling/ (August 30, 2016).Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2011b. Seattletonian to Faux Hick: Mapping perceptions of English in Washington. American Speech 86(4). 383–413.Google Scholar

Hahn, Christina. 2006. Clear-cut concepts vs. methodological ritual. Etic and emic revisited. Beitrage zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft 16(1–2). 245–262.Google Scholar

Harris, Marvin. 1976. History and significance of the emic/etic distinction. Annual Review of Anthropology 5. 329–350.Google Scholar

Hazen, Kirk & Fluharty, Ellen. 2004. Defining Appalachian English. In Bender, Margaret (ed.), Linguistic Diversity in the South: Changing Codes, Practices and Ideology, 50–65. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar

Hoenigswald, Henry. 1966. A proposal for the study of folk-linguistics. In Bright, William (ed.), Sociolinguistics, 16–26. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Iannàccaro, Gabriele & Dell’Acquila, Vittorio. 2001. Mapping languages from inside: notes on perceptual dialectology. Social & Cultural Geography 2(3). 265–280.Google Scholar

Irons, Terry Lynn. 2007. On the Southern shift in Appalachian English. In Cook, Toni & Evanini, Keelan (eds.), Selected Papers from NWAV 35: University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 13(2). 121–134.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, & Boberg, Charles. 2006. The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology and Sound Change. A Multimedia Reference Tool. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Lett, James. 1990. Emics and etics: Notes on the epistemology of anthropology. In Headland, Thomas N., Pike, Kenneth L. & Harris, Marvin (eds.), Emics and Etics: The Insider/Outsider Debate. Frontiers of Anthropology, Vol. 7, 127–142. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Long, Daniel & Preston, Dennis R. (eds.). 2002. Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Milroy, Leslie. 1980. Language and Social Networks. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Milroy, Leslie. 2004. Language ideologies and linguistic change. In Fought, Carmen (ed.), Sociolinguistic Variation: Critical Reflections, 161–177. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Montgomery, Chris. 2014. Perceptual ideology across the Scottish-English border. In Watt, Dominic & Llamas, Carmen (eds.), Language, Borders and Identities, 118–136. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Montgomery, Chris & Cramer, Jennifer. 2016. Developing Methods in Perceptual Dialectology. In Cramer, & Montgomery, (eds.), 9–24.Google Scholar

Montgomery, Chris & Stoeckle, Philipp. 2013. Geographic information systems and perceptual dialectology: A method for processing draw-a-map data. Journal of Linguistic Geography 1(1). 52–85.Google Scholar

Montgomery, Michael. 2013. The historical background and nature of the Englishes of Appalachia. In Clark, Amy & Hayward, Nancy (eds.), Talking Appalachian: Voice, Identity, and Community, 25–53. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar

Niedzielski, Nancy. 1999. The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. In Milroy, Lesley & Preston, Dennis R. (eds.), Attitudes, Perception, and Linguistic Issues. Journal of Language and Social Psychology special issue 18(1). 162–85.Google Scholar

Niedzielski, Nancy & Preston, Dennis R.. 2000. Folk Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Pike, Kenneth L. 1954. Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior, Part 1. Glendale, CA: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 1989. Perceptual Dialectology: Nonlinguists’ View of Aerial Linguistics. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 1996. Where the worst English is spoken. In Schneider, Edgar W. (ed.), Focus on the USA, 297–369. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. (ed.). 1999a. Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 1999b. A language attitude approach to the perception of regional variety. In Preston, (ed.), 359–373.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 2010a. Language, people, salience, and space: Perceptual dialectology and language regard. Dialectologia 5. 87–131.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 2010b. Variation in language regard. In Gilles, Peter, Scharloth, Joachim, & Ziegler, Evelyn (eds.), Varatio delectat: Empirische Evidenzen und theoretische Passungen sprachlicher Variation, für Klaus J. Mattheier zum 65. Geburtstag, 7–27. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 2016. Introduction. In Cramer, & Montgomery, (eds.), 1–8.Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 1979. Language structure and linguistic ideology. In Clyne, Paul R., Hanks, William F., and Hofbauer, Carol L. (eds.), The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels, 193–247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 1974. The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wolfram, Walt. 1969. A Sociolinguistic Description of Detroit Negro Speech. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Wolfram, Walt & Christian, Donna. 1976. Appalachian Speech. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Woolard, Kathryn A. 1992. Language ideology: Issues and approaches. Pragmatics 2(3). 235–249.Google Scholar

Attardo, Salvatore & Brown, Steven. 2005. What’s the use of linguistics? Pre-service English teachers’ beliefs towards language use and variation. In Bartels, Nat (ed.), Applied Linguistics and Language Teacher Education, 91–102. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers/Springer.Google Scholar

Baugh, John. 2012. SWB (Speaking while Black or speaking while Brown): Linguistic profiling and discrimination based on speech as a surrogate for race in international perspective. New Ways of Analyzing Variation 41. Bloomington, Indiana.Google Scholar

Cargile, Aaron Castelan & Bradac, James J.. 2001. Attitudes toward language: A review of speaker-evaluation research and a general process model. Communication Yearbook 25. 347–382.Google Scholar

Cargile, Aaron Castelan & Giles, Howard. 1997. Understanding language attitudes: Exploring listener affect and identity. Language & Communication 17(3). 195–217.Google Scholar

CCCC/NCTE. 2000. Language knowledge and awareness survey conducted by CCCC Language Policy Committee. Chair, Geneva Smitherman. www.ncte.org/library/NCTEFiles/Groups/CCCC/Committees/langsurvey.pdfGoogle Scholar

Cook, Stuart W. & Sellitz, Claire. 1964. A multiple-indicator approach to attitude measurement. Psychological Bulletin 62(1). 36–55. doi: 10.1037/h0040289Google Scholar

Coupland, Nikolas & Bishop, Hywel. 2007. Ideologised values for British accents. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(1). 74–93.Google Scholar

D’Anglejan, Alison & Tucker, G. Richard. 1973. Sociolinguistic correlates of speech style in Quebec. In Shuy, & Fasold, (eds.), 1–27.Google Scholar

Dunstan, Stephany Brett, Wolfram, Walt, Jaeger, Audrey J., & Crandall, Rebecca E.. 2015. Educating the educated: Language diversity in the university backyard. American Speech 90(2). 266–280.Google Scholar

Garrett, Peter. 2010. Attitudes to Language. Key Topics in Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Giles, Howard. 1971. Ethnocentrism and the evaluation of accented speech. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 10(2). 187–188.Google Scholar

Houston, Susan H. 1978. An EJ readership survey: Language attitudes and information study. The English Journal 67(3). 33–38.Google Scholar

International personality item pool: A scientific collaboratory for the development of advanced measures of personality traits and other individual differences http://ipip.ori.org/. Accessed: July 8, 2012.Google Scholar

Kamata, Akihito, Turhan, Ahmet, & Darandari, Eqbal. 2013. Estimating reliability for multidimensional composite scale scores. Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association. Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar

Kelley, Ken. 2007. Methods for the behavioral, educational, and social sciences: An R package. Behavior Research Methods 39(4). 979–984.Google Scholar

Kelley, Ken & Lai, Keke. 2012. MBESS: An R package. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MBESS. Accessed: August 20, 2013.Google Scholar

Ladegaard, Hans J. 2000. Language attitudes and sociolinguistic behavior: Exploring attitude-behavior relations in language. Journal of Sociolinguistics 4(2). 214–233.Google Scholar

Luhman, Reid. 1990. Appalachian English stereotypes: Language attitudes in Kentucky. Language in Society 19(3). 331–348.Google Scholar

McKenzie, Robert M. & Osthus, Dietmar. 2011. That which we call a rose by any other name would sound as sweet: Folk perceptions, status and language variation. AILA Review 24(1). 100–115.Google Scholar

McKirnan, David J. & Hamayan, Else V.. 1984. Speech norms and attitudes toward outgroup members: A test of a model in a bicultural context. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 3(1). 21–38.Google Scholar

Miller, J. D. 2011. Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus, 112(2). 29–48.Google Scholar

Niedzielski, Nancy. 1999. The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(1). 62–85.Google Scholar

Oppenheim, A. N. 1992. Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar

Ostrom, Elinor, Gardner, Roy, & Walker, James. 1994. Rules, Games, and Common-pool Resources. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Pantos, Andrew J. & Perkins, Andrew W.. 2013. Measuring implicit and explicit attitudes toward foreign accented speech. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 32(1). 3–20.Google Scholar

Perloff, Richard M. 2008. The Dynamics of Persuasion: Communication and Attitudes in the 21st Century, 3rd edn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 2010. Variation in language regard. In Gilles, Peter, Scharloth, Joachim, & Ziegler, Evelyn (eds.), Variatio delectat: Empirische Evidenzen und theoretische Passungen sprachlicher Variation, für Klaus J. Mattheier zum 65. Geburtstag, 7–27. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 2015. Does language regard vary? In Prikhodkine, Alexei & Preston, Dennis R. (eds.), Responses to Language Varieties: Variability, Processes, and Outcomes, 1–36. IMPACT: Studies in Language and Society 39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

R Core Team 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed: August 20, 2013.Google Scholar

Reaser, Jeffrey. 2006. The effect of dialect awareness on adolescent knowledge and attitudes. Durham, NC: Duke University dissertation.Google Scholar

Shuy, Roger & Fasold, Ralph (eds.). 1973. Language Attitudes: Current Perspectives. Washington, DC: Georgetown University.Google Scholar

Soukup, Barbara. 2012. Current issues in the social psychological study of “language attitudes”: Constructionism, context, and the attitude-behavior link. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(4). 212–224.Google Scholar

Taylor, Orlando L. 1973. Teachers’ attitudes toward Black and nonstandard English as measured by the language attitude scale. In Shuy, & Fasold, (eds.), 174–201.Google Scholar

Williams, Frederick. 1973. Some research notes on dialect attitudes and stereotypes. In Shuy, & Fasold, (eds.), 113–128.Google Scholar

Zinberg, Richard E., Revelle, William, Yovel, Iftah, & Li, Wen. 2005. Cronbach’s Alpha, Revelle’s Beta, and McDonald’s Omega: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika 70(1). 123–133.Google Scholar

Bezooijen, Renée van. 1997. Normen met betrekking tot het Standaard Nederlands. Taal en Tongval.TijdschriftvoorDialectologie 10. 30–48.Google Scholar

Knotter, Ad. 2002. Aesthetic evaluation of Dutch. Comparisons across dialects, accents and languages. In Long, & Preston, (eds.), 13–31.Google Scholar

Cornips, Leonie. 2013. Recent developments in the Limburg dialect region. In Hinskens, & Taeldeman, (eds.), 378–399.Google Scholar

Cornips, Leonie & Ad Knotter. In press. Inventing Limburg (the Netherlands): territory, history, language and identity. In Helen Christen, Peter Gilles, Cristoph Purschke (eds.), Räume, Grenzen, Übergänge. ZDL Beihefte, 71–92. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar

Cornips, Leonie & Rooij, Vincent de. 2015. Belonging through language: Cultural practices in the periphery. The politics of Carnival in the Dutch province of Limburg. Anthropological Journal of European Cultures 24(1). 83–101.Google Scholar

Cornips, Leonie, Rooij, Vincent de, & Stengs, Irene L.. 2012. Carnavalesk taalgebruik en de constructie van locale identiteiten. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1). 15–40.Google Scholar

Cornips, Leonie, Rooij, Vincent de, Stengs, Irene, & Thissen, Lotte. 2016. Local language and local media. Reproducing the multi-dialectal space of Limburg (the Netherlands). In Coupland, Nikolas, Mortensen, Janus & Thøgersen, Jacob (eds.), Style, Media and Language Ideologies, 189–216. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar

Doesborgh, Wim. 2014. De vijand heet Zuid-Limburg. De Limburger/Limburgs Dagblad, February 26, 2–3.Google Scholar

Driessen, Geert. 2006. Ontwikkelingen in het gebruik van streektalen en dialecten in de periode 1995–2003. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen 75. 103–113.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2011. Fractals all the way down. Paper presented at the workshop on The Construction of Local Identities through Language and Culture. Netherlands Institute of Advanced Studies. Wassenaar.Google Scholar

Evans, Betsy. 2013. Seattle to Spokane: Mapping perceptions of English in Washington. Journal of English Linguistics 41. 268–291.Google Scholar

Goeman, Ton. 2002. Perception of dialect distance: Standard and dialect in relation to new data on Dutch varieties. In Long, & Preston, (eds.), 137–151.Google Scholar

Goeman, Ton & Jongenburger, Willy. 2009. Dimensions and determinants of dialect use in the Netherlands at the individual and regional levels at the end of the twentieth century. Dialect death in Europe? International Journal of Sociology of Language 196/197. 31–72.Google Scholar

Gooskens, Charlotte, Bezooijen, Rene van & Nerbonne, John. 2013. Perception of geographically conditioned linguistic variation. In Hinskens, & Taeldeman, (eds.), 567–585.Google Scholar

Grondelaers, Stefan & Hout, Roeland van. 2010. Is Standard Dutch with a regional accent standard or not? Evidence from native speakers’ attitudes. Language Variation and Change 22. 221–239.Google Scholar

Grondelaers, Stefan, Hout, Roeland van & Harst, Sander van der. 2015. Subjective accent strength perceptions are not only a function of objective strength. Evidence from Netherlandic Standard Dutch. Speech Communication 74. 1–11.Google Scholar

Hagen, Anton & Giesbers, Herman. 1988. Dutch sociolinguistic studies. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 73. 29–44.Google Scholar

Heeringa, Wilbert. 2004. Measuring dialect pronunciation. Groningen: University of Groningen doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar

Hermans, Ben. 2013. Phonological features of Limburgian dialects. In Hinskens, & Taeldeman, (eds.), 336–356.Google Scholar

Hinskens, Frans & Taeldeman, Johan (eds.). 2013. Language and Space: Dutch. An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Irvine, Judith. T. & Gal, Susan. 2000. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Kroskrity, Paul V. (ed.), Regimes of Language, Ideologies, Polities and Identities, 35–83. Santa Fe, NM: SAR Press.Google Scholar

Knotter, Ad (ed.). 2009a. Dit is Limburg! Opstellen over de Limburgse identiteit. Sociaal Historisch Centrum voor Limburg: Waanders Uitgeverij.Google Scholar

Knotter, Ad. 2009b. Limburg bestaat niet. Paradoxen van een sterke identiteit. In Knotter, (ed.), 263–277.Google Scholar

Knotter, Ad. 2011. Regional character and regional stereotypes: some thoughts about their construction in Dutch Limburg. Paper presented at the workshop on The Construction of Local Identities through Language and Culture. Netherlands Institute of Advanced Studies, Wassenaar, the Netherlands.Google Scholar

Long, Daniel & Preston, Dennis R. (eds.). 2002. Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Maastricht Dictionary online (Dictionair vaan de Mesteechter Taol). http://www.mestreechtertaol.nl/ (December 2015).Google Scholar

Massey, Doreen. 1993. Power geometry and a progressive sense of place. In Bird, Jon, Curtis, Barry, Putnam, Tim, & Tickner, Lisa (eds.), Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change, 60–70. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mathijsen, Marita. 2011. De Limburger als de ander. Roermond, Netherlands: Letterkundig Centrum Limburg.Google Scholar

Niedzielski, Nancy & Preston, Dennis. 2010. Folk Linguistics. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Pietikäinen, Sari & Kelly-Holmes, Helen (eds.). 2013. Multilingualism and the Periphery. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 2002. Language with an attitude. In Chambers, J.K., Trudgill, Peter & Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 40–66. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 2010. Language, people, salience, space, perceptual dialectology and language regard. Dialectologia 5. 87–131.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 2011. The power of language regard – Discrimination, classification, comprehension, and production. Dialectologia Special Issue II. 9–33.Google Scholar

Smakman, Dirk. 2006. Standard Dutch in the Netherlands. A Sociolinguistic and Phonetic Description. Utrecht: LOT 135.Google Scholar

Thissen, Lotte. 2013. The ambiguities of Limburgerness. Language, place and belonging in Limburg, the Netherlands. Etnofoor 25(2). 119–143.Google Scholar

Thissen, Lotte & Cornips, Leonie. 2014. Sjtómme Limburger met een zachte G. In Andeweg, Agnes & Wesseling, Lies (eds.), Wat de verbeelding niet vermag! Essays bij het afscheid van Maaike Meijer, 295–300. Nijmegen: Vantilt.Google Scholar

Wijers, Carla. 2009. ‘In één hand de rozenkrans, in de andere een glas bier’. De Limburgse identiteit onder de loep. In Knotter, Ad (ed.), Dit is Limburg! Opstellen over de Limburgse identiteit, 127–150. Sociaal Historisch Centrum voor Limburg: Waanders Uitgeverij.Google Scholar

Wikimedia Commons contributors, “Atlas of the Netherlands,” Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Atlas_of_the_Netherlands&oldid=203571069 (September 20, 2016).Google Scholar

Beregszászi, Anikó. 2012. A lehetetlent lehetni: Tantárgy-pedagógiai útmutató és feladatgyűjtemény az anyanyelv oktatásához a kárpátaljai magyar iskolák 5–9. osztályában. Budapest: Tinta Könyvkiadó.Google Scholar

Cameron, Deborah. 1995. Verbal Hygiene. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Dornbach, F. Mária & Kontra, Miklós. 2013. Falusi történet. In Benő, Attila, Fazakas, Emese & Kádár, Edit (eds.), “... hogy legyen a víznek lefolyása...”: Köszöntő kötet Szilágyi N. Sándor tiszteletére, 99–119. Kolozsvár: Erdélyi Múzeum-Egyesület.Google Scholar

Fenyvesi, Anna (ed.). 2005. Hungarian Language Contact Outside Hungary. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Gal, Susan. 1995. Linguistic theories and national images in 19th century Hungary. Pragmatics 5(2). 155–166.Google Scholar

Hudson, Richard. 2004. Why education needs linguistics (and vice versa). Journal of Linguistics 40. 105–130.Google Scholar

Hudson, Richard & Walmsley, John. 2005. The English patient: English grammar and teaching in the twentieth century. Journal of Linguistics 41. 593–622.Google Scholar

Kontra, Miklós. 2002. Where is the “most beautiful” and the “ugliest” Hungarian spoken? In Long, Daniel & Preston, Dennis R. (eds.), Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology, Vol. 2, 205–218. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. (ed.). 2003. Nyelv és társadalom a rendszerváltáskori Magyarországon. Budapest: Osiris Kiadó.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 2006. Sustainable linguicism. In Hinskens, Frans (ed.), Language Variation – European Perspectives, 97–126. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 2009. Mivel korrelálnak a nyelvi előítéletek Budapesten? In Borbély, Anna, Kremmer, Ildikó Vančoné, & Hattyár, Helga (eds.), Nyelvideológiák, attitűdök és sztereotípiák, 37–51. Budapest: Tinta Könyvkiadó.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 2010. Hasznos nyelvészet. Somorja: Fórum Kisebbségkutató Intézet.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 2016. Hungary: A sham fightback against the domination of English. In Bunce, Pauline, Phillipson, Robert, Rapatahana, Vaughan, & Tupas, Ruanni (eds.), Why English? Confronting the Hydra, 234–241. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Kontra, Miklós, Péntek, János, & Szilágyi, Sándor N.. 2011. A Kárpát-medencei szociolingvisztikai vizsgálat 1996. évi romániai kérdőíve és kereszttáblái (II.). Nyelv- és Irodalomtudományi Közlemények LV(1). 67–84.Google Scholar

Kontra, Miklós & Vargha, Fruzsina S.. 2014. Are there speakers of the /ɛ/ vs. /e/ dialect in Budapest? In Barysevich, Alena, D’Arcy, Alexandra & Heap, David (eds.), Proceedings of Methods XIV, 14–24. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Lippi-Green, Rosina. 1997. English with an Accent: London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Margócsy, István. 1996. Magyar nyelv és/vagy irodalom: Egy tantárgy kialakulása és változásai. Budapesti Könyvszemle 1996/1. 42–52.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 2006a. “Istennőm, végzetem, mindenem, magyar nyelv!”: A magyar nyelv kultikus megközelítései – 1. rész. Beszélő 2006/10. 95–109.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 2006b. “Istennőm, végzetem, mindenem, magyar nyelv!”: A magyar nyelv kultikus megközelítései – 2. rész. Beszélő 2006/11. 90–98.Google Scholar

Milroy, James. 1999. The consequences of standardisation in descriptive linguistics, in Bex, Tony & Watts, Richard J. (eds.), Standard English: The Widening Debate, 16–39. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ngũgĩ, wa Thiong’o. 1987. Decolonising the Mind: The Politics of Language in African Literature. London: James Currey.Google Scholar

Pléh, Csaba & Bodor, Péter. 2000. Linguistic superego in a normative language community and the stigmatization – hypercorrection dimension. Multilingua 19(1–2). 123–139.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 2011. The power of language regard – discrimination, classification, comprehension, and production. Dialectologia. Special issue II. 9–33.Google Scholar

Szabó, Tamás Péter. 2012. “Kirakunk táblákat, hogy csúnyán beszélni tilos”: A javítás mint gyakorlat és mint téma diákok és tanáraik metanyelvében. Dunaszerdahely: Gramma.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 2013. A corpus-based analysis of language ideologies in Hungarian school metalanguage. Research in Corpus Linguistics 1. 65–79.Google Scholar

Szilágyi, N. Sándor. 2001. A többség nyelvi jogai. In Andor, József, Szűcs, Tibor, & Terts, István (eds.), Színes eszmék nem alszanak...: Szépe György 70. születésnapjára, 1209–1218. Pécs: Lingua Franca Csoport.Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2016. Making Waves: The Story of Variationist Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

The Fundamental Law of Hungary (April 25, 2011). http://www.kormany.hu/download/e/02/00000/The%20New%20Fundamental%20Law%20of%20Hungary.pdf (March 30, 2016).Google Scholar

Wolfram, Walt, Reaser, Jeffrey, & Vaughn, Charlotte. 2008. Operationalizing linguistic gratuity: From principle to practice. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(16). 1109–1134.Google Scholar

Bates, Douglas, Mächler, Martin, Bolker, Ben, & Walker, Steve. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lmer4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1). 1–48. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01Google Scholar

Clopper, Cynthia & Bradlow, Ann R.. 2008. Perception of dialect variation in noise: Intelligibility and classification. Language and Speech 51(3). 175–198.Google Scholar

Clopper, Cynthia & Pate, John. 2008. Effects of talker and token variability on perceptual learning of dialect categories. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 5(1). 060002.Google Scholar

Clopper, Cynthia & Tamati, Terrin. 2010. Lexical recognition memory across dialects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 127(3). 1956.Google Scholar

Dimov, Svetlin, Katseff, Shira, & Johnson, Keith. 2012. Social and personality variables in compensation for altered auditory feedback. In Solé, Maria-Josep & Recasens, Daniel (eds.). The Initiation of Sound Change: Perception, Production, and Social Factors, 185–210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

D’Onofrio, Annette. 2015. Persona-based information shapes linguistic perception: Valley Girls and California vowels. Journal of Sociolinguistics 19(2). 241–256.Google Scholar

Drager, Katie. 2010. Sociophonetic variation in speech perception. Language and Linguistic Compass 4(7). 473–480.Google Scholar

Farrington, Charlie, Kendall, Tyler, & Fridland, Valerie. 2015. The dynamic South: Inherent spectral change in the Southern Vowel Shift. Paper presented at Southeastern Conference on Linguistics (SECOL) 82/Language Variation in the South (LAVIS) IV. Raleigh, North Carolina.Google Scholar

Fridland, Valerie & Kendall, Tyler. 2012. The effect of regional vowel differences on vowel perception and production: Evidence from U.S. vowel shifts. Lingua 122(7). 779–793.Google Scholar

Fridland, Valerie 2015. Within-region diversity in the Southern Vowel Shift: Production and perception. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Glasgow, UK: University of Glasgow. Paper number 500. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/Papers/ICPHS0500.pdfGoogle Scholar

Fridland, Valerie, Kendall, Tyler, & Farrington, Charlie. 2014. Durational and spectral differences in American English vowels: Dialect variation within and across regions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 136(1). 341–349.Google Scholar

Giles, Howard & Ryan, Ellen B. (eds.). 1982. Attitudes towards Language Variation. Social and Applied Contexts. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Harrington, Jonathan. 2012. The coarticulatory basis of diachronic high back vowel fronting. In Solé, Maria-Josep & Recasens, Daniel (eds.). The Initiation of Sound Change: Perception, Production, and Social Factors, 103–122. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hartley, Laura C. 1999. A view from the West: Perceptions of U.S. dialects by Oregon residents. In Preston, Dennis R. (ed.). Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology, Vol. 1, 315–332. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hay, Jennifer & Drager, Katie. 2010. Stuffed toys and speech perception. Linguistics 48(4). 865–892.Google Scholar

Hay, Jennifer, Nolan, Aaron, & Drager, Katie. 2006. From fush to feesh: Exemplar priming in speech perception. The Linguistic Review, 23. 351–79.Google Scholar

Hay, Jennifer, Warren, Paul, & Drager, Katie. 2006. Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress. Journal of Phonetics 34(4). 458–484.Google Scholar

Kendall, Tyler & Fridland, Valerie. 2012. Variation in the production and perception of mid front vowels in the US Southern Vowel Shift. Journal of Phonetics 40. 289–306.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1991. The three dialects of English. In Eckert, Penelope (ed.). New Ways of Analyzing Variation, 1–44. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change: Social Factors. Boston, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, & Boberg, Charles. 2006. The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology and Sound Change. A Multimedia Reference Tool. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Magnuson, James S. & Nusbaum, Howard C.. 2007. Acoustic differences, listener expectations, and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology 33(2). 391–409.Google Scholar

Niedzielski, Nancy A. 1999. The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Social Psychology 18. 62–85.Google Scholar

Niedzielski, Nancy A. & Preston, Dennis R.. 2000. Folk linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Nygaard, Lynne C., Sommers, Mitchell S., & Pisoni, David B.. 1994. Speech perception as a talker-contigent process. Psychological Science 5(1). 42–46.Google Scholar

Ohala, John. 1981. The listener as a source of sound change. In Masek, C. S., Laver, John, & Anderson, John (eds.). The Cognitive Representation of Speech, 111–122. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Ohala, John. 1989. Sound change is drawn from a pool of synchronic variation. In Breivik, Leiv Egil & Jahr, Ernst Hakon (eds.). Language Change: Contributions to the Study of Its Causes, 173–198. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyer.Google Scholar

Pisoni, David B. 1993. Long-term memory in speech perception: Some new findings on talker variability, speaking rate and perceptual learning. Speech Communication 13. 109–125.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 1989. Perceptual Dialectology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 1993. Folk dialectology. In Preston, Dennis R. (ed.). American Dialect Research, 333–378. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 1996. Where the worst English is spoken. In Schneider, Edgar (ed.). Focus on the USA, 297–360. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. (ed.). 1999. Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 2013. Language with an attitude. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, Peter & Schilling, Natalie (eds.). The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 2nd edn. 157–182. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Remez, Robert E., Philip, E. Rubin, P., Pisoni, David B., & Carrell, Thomas D.. 1981. Speech perception without traditional speech cues. Science 212. 947–950.Google Scholar

Shuy, Roger W. & Fasold, Ralph W. (eds.). 1973. Language Attitudes: Current Trends and Prospects. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Solé, Maria-Josep & Recasens, Daniel (eds.). 2012. The Initiation of Sound Change: Perception, Production, and Social Factors. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Sumner, Meghan & Samuel, Arthur. 2009. The effect of experience on the perception and representation of dialect variants. Journal of Memory and Language 60. 487–501.Google Scholar

Thomas, Erik. 2002. Sociophonetic applications of speech perception experiments. American Speech 77(2). 115–147.Google Scholar