Bamman, David, Eisenstein, Jacob & Schnoebelen, Tyler. 2014. Gender identity and lexical variation in social media. Journal of Sociolinguistics 18, 135–160.Google Scholar

Barbaresi, Adrian. 2016. Collection and indexation of Tweets with a geographical focus. Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2016), May 2016. Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Challenges in the Management of Large Corpora (CMLC), (2016), 24–27. <hal-01323274>>Google Scholar

Bergs, Alexander. 2005. Social Networks and Historical Sociolinguistics: Studies in Morphosyntactic Variation in the Paston Letters 1421–1503. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Blake, Norman. Introduction. 1992. In Blake, Norman (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. II, 1066–1476, 1–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Boyd, Danah & Crawford, Kate. 2012. Critical questions for big data. Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society 15(5), 662–679. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878.Google Scholar

Burger, John D., Henderson, John, Kim, George & Zarrella, Guido. 2011. Discriminating gender on Twitter. Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 1301–1309. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. www.aclweb.org/anthology/D11-1120.Google Scholar

Cheshire, Jenny, Kerswill, Paul, Fox, Sue & Torgersen, Eivind. 2011. Contact, the feature pool and the speech community: The emergence of Multicultural London English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(2), 151–196.Google Scholar

Coats, Steven. 2015. Non-standard lexical and grammatical resources in Finland Twitter English. A paper presented at Poznan Linguistics Meeting, 19 September 2015, Poznan, Poland. http://cc.oulu.fi/~scoats/poznan1handout.pdf (22.1.2018).Google Scholar

Coats, Steven. 2016. Grammatical frequencies and gender in Nordic Twitter Englishes. In Fišer, Darja and Beißwenger, Michael (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Conference on CMC and Social Media Corpora for the Humanities, 12–16. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana Academic Publishing.Google Scholar

Coats, Steven. 2017a. European language ecology and bilingualism with English on Twitter. In Wigham, Ciara & Stemle, Egon (eds.), Proceedings of the 5th Conference on CMC and Social Media Corpora for the Humanities, 35–38. Bozen/Bolzano: Eurac Research.Google Scholar

Coats, Steven. 2017b. Gender and lexical type frequencies in Finland Twitter English. In Hiltunen, Turo, McVeigh, Joe & Säily, Tanja (eds.), Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 19: Big and Rich Data in English Corpus Linguistics: Methods and Explorations. Helsinki: VARIENG. www.helsinki.fi/varieng/series/volumes/19/coats/.Google Scholar

Dunbar, Robin. 1992. Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates. Journal of Human Evolution, 22(6), 469–493.Google Scholar

Jacob, Eisenstein, O’Connor, Brendan, Smith, Noah A. & Xing, Eric P.. 2014. Diffusion of lexical change in social media. PLoS ONE 9(11), e113114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113114.Google Scholar

EJES. 2000. European Journal of English Studies 4(3).Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Susan. 2000. The spectator, the politics of social networks, and language standardization in eighteenth century England. In Wright, Laura (ed.), The Development of Standard English 1300–1800: Theories, Descriptions, Conflicts, 195–218. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gonçalves, Bruno, Loureiro-Porto, Lucía, Ramasco, José & Sánchez, David. 2018. Mapping the Americanization of English in space and time. PLoS ONE 13(5), e0197741. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197741.Google Scholar

Graham, Mark, Hale, Scott A. & Gaffney, Devin. 2013. Where in the world are you? Geolocation and language identification in Twitter. The Professional Geographer 66, 568–578. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2014.907699.Google Scholar

Granovetter, Mark. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78(6), 1360–1380.Google Scholar

Granovetter, Mark. 1983. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory 1, 201–233.Google Scholar

Hiltunen, Turo, McVeigh, Joe & Säily, Tanja. 2017. How to turn linguistic data into evidence? In Hiltunen, Turo, McVeigh, Joe & Säily, Tanja (eds.), Big and Rich Data in English Corpus Linguistics: Methods and Explorations (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 1). Helsinki: VARIENG. www.helsinki.fi/varieng/series/volumes/19/.Google Scholar

Huang, Yuan, Guo, Diansheng, Kasakoff, Alice & Grieve, Jack. 2016. Understanding US regional linguistic variation with Twitter data analysis. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 59, 244–255. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.12.003.Google Scholar

Kirschenbaum, Matthew G. 2010. What is digital humanities and what’s it doing in English departments? ADA Bulletin 150, 55–61. doi: 10:1632/ade.150.55.Google Scholar

Krishnamurthy, Balachander, Gill, Phillipa & Arlitt, Martin. 2008. A few chirps about Twitter. In Faloutsos, Christos, Karagiannis, Thomas & Rodriguez, Pablo (eds.), Proceedings of the First Workshop on Online Social Networks (WOSN ’08), 19–24. New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/1397735.1397741.Google Scholar

Laitinen, Mikko. 2016. Ongoing changes in English modals: On the developments in ELF. In Timofeeva, Olga, Chevalier, Sarah, Gardner, Anne-Christine & Honkapohja, Alpo (eds.), New Approaches in English Linguistics: Building Bridges, (Studies in Language Companion Series), 175–196. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.177.07lai.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laitinen, Mikko, Lundberg, Jonas, Levin, Magnus & Martins, Rafael. 2018. The Nordic tweet stream: A dynamic real-time monitor corpus of big and rich language data. Proc. of Digital Humanities in the Nordic Countries 3rd Conference, Helsinki, Finland, March 7–9, 2018. CEUR-WS.org/Vol-2084/short10.pdf.Google Scholar

Laitinen, Mikko, Lundberg, Jonas, Levin, Magnus & Lakaw, Alexander. 2017a. Utilizing multilingual language data in (nearly) real time: the case of the Nordic Tweet Stream. Journal of Universal Computer Science 23 (11), 1038–1056.Google Scholar

Laitinen, Mikko, Lundberg, Jonas, Levin, Magnus & Lakaw, Alexander. 2017b. Revisiting weak ties: using present-day social media data in variationist studies. In Säily, Tanja, Palander-Collin, Minna, Nurmi, Arja & Auer, Anita (eds.), Exploring Future Paths for Historical Sociolinguistics, 303–325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ahs.7.12lai.Google Scholar

Fabio, Lamanna, Lenormand, Maxime, Salas-Olmedo, María Henar, Romanillos, Gustavo, Gonçalves, Bruno & Ramasco, José J.. 2018. Immigrant community integration in world cities. PLoS ONE 13(3), e0191612. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191612.Google Scholar

Leetaru, Kalev H., Wang, Shaowen, Cao, Guofeng, Padmanabhan, Anand & Shook, Eric. 2013. Mapping the global Twitter heartbeat: The geography of Twitter. First Monday 18(5). http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4366/3654.Google Scholar

Lundberg, Jones, Nordqvist, Jonas & Matosevic, Antonio. 2018. On-the-fly detection of autogenerated Tweets, arXiv preprint.Google Scholar

Lundberg, Jonas, Nordqvist, Jonas & Laitinen, Mikko. 2019. Towards a language independent Twitter bot detector. Proceedings of the Digital Humanities in the Nordic Region (DHN2019), University of Copenhagen, March 6–9, 2019.Google Scholar

Mauranen, Anna. 2018. Conceptualising ELF. In Jenkins, Jennifer, Baker, Will & Dewey, Martin (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mauranen, Anna. 2012. Exploring ELF: Academic English Shaped by Non-Native Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McCarty, Christopher, Peter, Killworth, Russell Bernard, H., Johnsen, Eugene & Shelley, Gene. 2001. Comparing two methods for estimating network size. Human Organization 60(1), 28–39.Google Scholar

Milroy, James. 1992. Linguistic Variation and Change. On the Historical Sociolinguistics of English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Milroy, Lesley. 2004. Social networks. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, Peter & Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 549–570. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milroy, James & Milroy, Lesley. 1985. Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics 21, 339–384. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700010306.Google Scholar

Rao, Delip, Yarowsky, David, Shreevats, Abhishek & Gupta, Manaswi. 2010. Classifying latent user attributes in Twitter. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Search and Mining User-Generated Contents, 37–44. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. doi: 10.1145/1871985.1871993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena. 1998. Social factors and pronominal change in the seventeenth century: The civil-war effect? In Fisiak, Jacek & Krygier, Marcin (eds.), Advances in English Historical Linguistics, 361–388. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Sairio, Anni. 2009. Language and Letters of the Bluestocking Network: Sociolinguistic Issues in Eighteenth-century Epistolary English (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki LXXV). Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar

Scheffler, Tatjana. 2014. A German Twitter Snapshot. Proceedings of LREC, (2014), 2284–2289.Google Scholar

Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William & Herzog, Marvin. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehmann, Winfred P. & Malkiel, Yakov (eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics, 95–188. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Arnon, Inbal & Christiansen, Morten H.. 2017. The role of multiword building blocks in explaining L1–L2 differences. Topics in Cognitive Science 9(3), 621–636.Google Scholar

Barlow, Michael. 2013. Individual differences and usage-based grammar. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(4), 443–478.Google Scholar

Barth, Danielle & Kapatsinski, Vsevolod. 2017. A multimodel inference approach to categorical variant choice: Construction, priming and frequency effects on the choice between full and contracted forms of am, are and is. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 13(2), 203–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beckner, Clay, Blythe, Richard, Bybee, Joan, Christiansen, Morten H., Croft, William, Ellis, Nick C., Holland, John, Ke, Jinyun, Larsen-Freeman, Diane & Schoenemann, Tom. 2009. Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning 59(s1), 1–26.Google Scholar

Bernolet, Sarah & Hartsuiker, Robert J.. 2010. Does verb bias modulate syntactic priming? Cognition 114(3), 455–461.Google Scholar

Bernolet, Sarah, Hartsuiker, Robert J. & Pickering, Martin J.. 2009. Persistence of emphasis in language production: A cross-linguistic approach. Cognition 112(2), 300–317.Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Branigan, Holly P., Pickering, Martin J. & Cleland, Alexandra A.. 2000. Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition 75(2), B13–B25.Google Scholar

Branigan, Holly P., Pickering, Martin J., McLean, Janet F. & Cleland, Alexandra A.. 2007. Syntactic alignment and participant role in dialogue. Cognition 104(2), 163–197.Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan & Spencer, Jessica. (n.d.). Frequency and variation in English subject-verb contraction. Unpublished manuscript. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Department of Linguistics and Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2002. Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change 14(3), 261–290.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82(4), 711–733.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan & Scheibman, Joanne. 1999. The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: The reduction of don’t in English. Linguistics 37(4), 575–596.Google Scholar

Charles, Maggie. 2004. The Construction of Stance: A Corpus-Based Investigation of Two Contrasting Disciplines. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Birmingham.Google Scholar

Cheng, Winnie, Greaves, Chris, Sinclair, John McH. & Warren, Martin. 2009. Uncovering the extent of the phraseological tendency: Towards a systematic analysis of concgrams. Applied Linguistics 30(2), 236–252.Google Scholar

D’Arcy, Alexandra & Tagliamonte, Sali A.. 2015. Not always variable: Probing the vernacular grammar. Language Variation and Change 27(3), 255–285.Google Scholar

Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2012. Different speakers, different grammars: Individual differences in native language attainment. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 2(3), 219–253.Google Scholar

de Bot, Kees & Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 2013. Researching second language development from a dynamic systems theory perspective. In Verspoor, Marjolijn, de Bot, Kees & Lowie, Wander (eds.), A Dynamic Approach to Second Language Development: Methods and Techniques, 5–23. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

de Bot, Kees, Lowie, Wander & Verspoor, Marjolijn. 2007. A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10(1), 7–21.Google Scholar

Divjak, Dagmar & Arppe, Antti. 2013. Extracting prototypes from exemplars: What can corpus data tell us about concept representation? Cognitive Linguistics 24(2), 221–274.Google Scholar

Ellis, Nick C. & Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 2006. Language emergence: Implications for Applied Linguistics – Introduction to the special issue. Applied Linguistics 27(4), 558–589.Google Scholar

Fodor, Janet D. 2002. Psycholinguistics cannot escape prosody. Proceedings of Speech Prosody, 83–90. Aix-en-Provence, France.Google Scholar

Francis, Gill, Hunston, Susan & Manning, Elizabeth. 1998. Collins COBUILD Grammar Patterns: Nouns and Adjectives. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Frank, Austin F. & Jaeger, T. Florian. 2008. Speaking rationally: Uniform information density as an optimal strategy for language production. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 30, 939–944.Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. 2017. Syntactic alternation research: Taking stock and some suggestions for the future. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 31(1), 8–29.Google Scholar

Groom, Nicholas. 2005. Pattern and meaning across genres and disciplines: An exploratory study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4(3), 257–277.Google Scholar

Hall, Christopher J., Joyce, Jack & Robson, Chris. 2017. Investigating the lexico-grammatical resources of a non-native user of English: The case of can and could in email requests. Applied Linguistics Review 8(1), 35–59.Google Scholar

Hartsuiker, Robert J., Pickering, Martin J. & Veltkamp, Eline. 2004. Is syntax separate or shared between languages? Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in Spanish-English bilinguals. Psychological Science 15(6), 409–414.Google Scholar

Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. (eds.). 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hundt, Marianne, Mollin, Sandra & Pfenninger, Simone E.. 2017. The Changing English Language: Psycholinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hunston, Susan. 2007. Semantic prosody revisited. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 12(2), 249–268.Google Scholar

Hunston, Susan. 2010. Starting with the small words. In Römer, Ute & Schulze, Rainer (eds.), Patterns, Meaningful Units and Specialized Discourses, 7–30. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaeger, T. Florian. 2006. Redundancy and Syntactic Reduction in Spontaneous Speech. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Stanford University.Google Scholar

Jenkins, Jennifer. 2015. Repositioning English and multilingualism in English as a Lingua Franca. Englishes in Practice 2(3), 49–85.Google Scholar

Jenkins, Jennifer, Baker, Will & Dewey, Martin (eds.). 2017. The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca (Routledge Handbooks in Applied Linguistics). Milton Park, Abingdon; New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jurafsky, Daniel, Bell, Alan, Gregory, Michelle & Raymond, William D.. 2001. Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production. Typological Studies in Language 45, 229–254.Google Scholar

Kaschak, Michael P. & Glenberg, Arthur M.. 2004. This construction needs learned. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133(3), 450.Google Scholar

Kaschak, Michael P., Kutta, Timothy J. & Schatschneider, Christopher. 2011. Long-term cumulative structural priming persists for (at least) one week. Memory & Cognition 39(3), 381–388.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1969. Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45(4), 715–762.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 2006. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Luka, Barbara J. & Barsalou, Lawrence W.. 2005. Structural facilitation: Mere exposure effects for grammatical acceptability as evidence for syntactic priming in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 52(3), 436–459.Google Scholar

MacKenzie, Laurel E. 2012. Locating Variation Above the Phonology. PhD thesis. University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

Mair, Christian. 2017. From priming and processing to frequency effects and grammaticalization? Contracted semi-modals in present-day English. In Hundt, Marianne, Mollin, Sandra & Pfenninger, Simone E. (eds.), The Changing English Language, 191–212. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mauranen, Anna. 2005. English as a Lingua Franca – an unknown language? In Cortese, Giuseppina & Duszak, Anna (eds.), Identity, Community, Discourse: English in Intercultural Settings, 269–293. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Mauranen, Anna. 2012. Exploring ELF: Academic English Shaped by Non-Native Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mauranen, Anna. 2013. Hybridism, edutainment, and doubt: Science blogging finding its feet. Nordic Journal of English Studies 12(1), 7–36.Google Scholar

Mauranen, Anna. 2017. Conceptualising ELF. In Jennifer, Jenkins, Baker, Will & Dewey, Martin (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca (Routledge Handbooks in Applied Linguistics), 7–24. Abingdon; New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

McCauley, Stewart M. & Christiansen, Morten H.. 2017. Computational investigations of multiword chunks in language learning. Topics in Cognitive Science 9(3), 637–652.Google Scholar

Mollin, Sandra. 2009. “I entirely understand” is a Blairism: The methodology of identifying idiolectal collocations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(3), 367–392.Google Scholar

Myers, Greg. 2009. The Discourse of Blogs and Wikis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Pickering, Martin J. & Garrod, Simon. 2004. Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27(02), 169–190.Google Scholar

Pickering, Martin J. & Garrod, Simon. 2017. Priming and language change. In Hundt, Marianne, Mollin, Sandra & Pfenninger, Simone E. (eds.), The Changing English Language, 173–190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pitzl, Marie-Luise. 2012. Creativity meets convention: idiom variation and re-metaphorization in ELF. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 1(1), 27–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poplack, Shana. 1980. The notion of the plural in Puerto Rican English: Competing constraints on (s) deletion. In Labov, William (ed.), Locating Language in Time and Space, 55–67. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Sankoff, David. 1988. Sociolinguistics and syntactic variation. In Newmeyer, Frederick J. (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, 140–161. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Seidlhofer, Barbara. 2009. Accommodation and the idiom principle in English as a Lingua Franca. Intercultural Pragmatics 6(2), 195–215.Google Scholar

Sinclair, John McH. 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2006. Morphosyntactic Persistence in Spoken English: A Corpus Study at the Intersection of Variationist Sociolinguistics, Psycholinguistics, and Discourse Analysis. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali. 2011. Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, Observation, Interpretation. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2006. Analysing Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Vetchinnikova, Svetlana. 2015. Usage-based recycling or creative exploitation of the shared code? The case of phraseological patterning. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 4(2), 223–252.Google Scholar

Vetchinnikova, Svetlana. 2017. On the relationship between the cognitive and the communal: A complex systems perspective. In Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani, Mauranen, Anna & Vetchinnikova, Svetlana (eds.), Changing English: Global and Local Perspectives (Topics in English Linguistics). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William & Herzog, Marvin. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehmann, Winfred P. & Malkiel, Yakov (eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics, 99–188. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Wright, David. 2017. Using word n-grams to identify authors and idiolects. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22(2), 212–241.Google Scholar

Wulff, Stefanie, Gries, Stefan Th. & Lester, Nicholas. 2018. Optional that in complementation by German and Spanish learners: Where and how German and Spanish learners differ from native speakers. In Tyler, Andrea, Huang, Lihong & Jan, Hana (eds.), What is Applied Cognitive Linguistics: Answers from Current SLA Research, 99–120. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Agustín-Llach, M. 2017. The impact of bilingualism on the acquisition of an additional language: Evidence from lexical knowledge, lexical fluency, and (lexical) cross-linguistic influence. International Journal of Bilingualism. doi:10.1177/1367006917728818.Google Scholar

Berthele, R. & Vanhove, J. 2017. What would disprove independence? Lessons learned from a study on biliteracy in Portuguese heritage language speakers in Switzerland. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. doi:10.1080/13670050.2017.1385590.Google Scholar

Bialystok, E. 2001. Bilingualism in Development: Language, Literacy, and Cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bialystok, E. et al. 2004. Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon Task. Psychology and Aging 19(2), 290−303. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.19.2.290.Google Scholar

Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M. & Freedman, M. 2007. Bilingualism as a protection against the onset of symptoms of dementia. Neuropsychologia 45(2), 459–464.Google Scholar

Bialystok, E. et al. 2010. Receptive vocabulary differences in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism (Cambridge, England) 13(4), 525–531. doi:10.1017/S1366728909990423.Google Scholar

Bialystok, E, Craik, F. I. M. & Luk, G. 2012. Bilingualism: Consequences for mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16(4), 240–250. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.001.Google Scholar

Bialystok, E. 2018. Bilingualism and executive function. What’s the connection? In Miller, D. et al. (ed.), Bilingual Cognition and Language: The State of the Science across its Subfields. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 283−305.Google Scholar

Bonnet, A. & Siemund, P. (eds.) 2018. Foreign Language Education in Multilingual Classrooms. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Canagarajah, S. 2007. Lingua franca English, multilingual communities and language acquisition. Modern Language Journal 91, 923−939.Google Scholar

Cenoz, J. 2003. The additive effect of bilingualism on third language acquisition: A review. The International Journal of Bilingualism 7, 71–88.Google Scholar

Cenoz, J. 2013. The influence of bilingualism on third language acquisition: Focus on multilingualism. Language Teaching 46(1). doi: 10.1017/S0261444811000218.Google Scholar

Cenoz, J. and Valencia, J. 1994. Additive trilingualism: Evidence from the Basque Country. Applied Psycholinguistics 15, 197−209.Google Scholar

Clark, H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620539.Google Scholar

Cogo, A. 2012. ELF and super-diversity: A case study of ELF multilingual practices from a business context. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 1(2), 287−313. doi:10.1515/jelf-2012-0020.Google Scholar

Council of Europe. 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.Google Scholar

Craik, F. I. M., Bialystok, E. & Freedman, M. 2010 Delaying the onset of Alzheimer disease: Bilingualism as a form of cognitive reserve. Neurology 75(19), 1726–1729. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181fc2a1c.Google Scholar

Cummins, J. 1976. The influence of bilingualism on cognitive growth: A synthesis of research findings and explanatory hypotheses. Working Papers on Bilingualism 9, 1–44.Google Scholar

Cummins, J. 1979. Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research 49(2), 222–251.Google Scholar

Cummins, J. 2000. Language, Power and Pedagogy: Bilingual Children in the Crossfire. Buffalo, NY: Multilingual Matters Ltd.Google Scholar

Cummins, J. 2001. Language, Power and Pedagogy: Bilingual Children in the Crossfire. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

de Swaan, A. 2001. Words of the World: The Global Language System. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Dewaele, J.-M. 2018. Why the dichotomy ‘L1 Versus LX User’ is better than ‘Native Versus Non-native Speaker’. Applied Linguistics 39(2), 236–240.Google Scholar

Duñabeitia, J. A. & Carreiras, M. 2015. The bilingual advantage: Acta est fabula? Cortex 73, 371−372. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.06.009.Google Scholar

Fleckenstein, J., Möller, J. & Baumert, J. 2018. Mehrsprachigkeit als Ressource: Kompetenzen dual-immersiv unterrichteter Schülerinnen und Schüler in der Drittsprache Englisch. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 1(3). doi: 10.1007/s11618-017-0792-9.Google Scholar

Flynn, S., Foley, C. & Vinnitskaya, I. 2004. The cumulative-enhancement model for language acquisition: Comparing adults’ and children’s patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition of relative clauses. International Journal of Multilingualism 1(1), 3−16.Google Scholar

Herdina, P. & Jessner, U. 2002. A Dynamic Model of Multilingualism. Perspectives of Changes Psycholinguistics. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

IBM Corp. 2015. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar

Ivanova, I. & Costa, A. 2008. Does bilingualism hamper lexical access in speech production? Acta Psychologica 127, 277−288. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.06.003.Google Scholar

Jessner, U. 2006. Linguistic Awareness in Multilinguals: English as a Third Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Jessner, U. 2008. Teaching third languages: Findings, trends and challenges. Language Teaching 41, 15–56.Google Scholar

Kachru, B. B. 1986. The Alchemy of English: The Spread, Functions, and Models of Non-Native Englishes. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Kuteeva, M. 2019. Revisiting the ‘E’ in EMI: students’ perceptions of standard English, lingua franca and translingual practices. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, doi: 10.1080/13670050.2019.1637395.Google Scholar

Lasagabaster, D. 1998. The threshold hypothesis applied to three languages in contact at school. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 1(2), 119–133.Google Scholar

Lasagabaster, D. 2001. Bilingualism, immersion programmes and language learning in the Basque Country. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 22(5), 401−425.Google Scholar

Lehtonen, M. et al. 2018. Is bilingualism associated with enhanced executive functioning in adults? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin 144(4), 394−425.Google Scholar

Leimgruber, J. R. E., Siemund, P. & Terassa, L. 2018. Singaporean students´ language repertoires and attitudes revisited. World Englishes 37(1), 1−25. doi:10.1111/weng.12292.Google Scholar

Lorenz, E. & Siemund, P. 2019a. Differences in the acquisition and production of English as a foreign language. A study of bilingual and monolingual students in Germany. In Vetter, E & Jessner, U (eds.), International Research on Multilingualism: Breaking with the Monolingual Perspective. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Lorenz, E. & Siemund, P. 2019b. The acquisition of English as an additional language by multilingual heritage speakers. In Meyer, M & Hoinkes, U. (eds.), Der Einfluss der Migration auf Sprach - und Kulturräume - The Impact of Migration on Linguistic and Cultural Areas. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

MacSwan, J. 2000. The Threshold Hypothesis, semilingualism, and other contributions to a deficit view of linguistic minorities. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 22(1), 3−45.Google Scholar

Maluch, J. T., Kempert, S., Neumann, M. & Stanat, P. 2015. The effect of speaking a minority language at home on foreign language learning. Learning and Instruction 36, 76–85.Google Scholar

Maluch, J. T., Neumann, M. & Kempert, S. 2016. Bilingualism as a resource for foreign language learning of language minority students? Empirical evidence from a longitudinal study during primary and secondary school in Germany. Learning and Individual Differences 51, 111–118.Google Scholar

Martin-Rhee, M. & Bialystok, E. 2008. The development of two types of inhibitory control in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 11(1), 81−93. doi: 10.1017/S1366728907003227.Google Scholar

Mauranen, A. 2012. Exploring ELF. Academic English Shaped by Non-Native Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mueller, J. T. 2018. English as a lingua franca at the multilingual university: A comparison of monolingually and multilingually raised students and instructors. In Bonnet, A. & Siemund, P. (eds.), Foreign Language Education in Multilingual Classrooms, 359−380. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Mueller, J. T. & Siemund, P. 2017. Die Sprachen der Lehre: English in the Multilingual University. In Gogolin, I. et al. (eds.), Mehrsprachigkeit in der nachhaltigen Universität. Projektbericht, 48−72. Hamburg: Universität Hamburg. URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-140469: 46–72.Google Scholar

Paap, K. R., Johnson, H. A. & Sawi, O. 2016. Should the search for bilingual advantages in executive functioning continue? Cortex 74, 305−314. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.09.010.Google Scholar

Peal, E. & Lambert, W. E. 1962. The relation of bilingualism to intelligence. Psychological Monographs 76(27), 1−23.Google Scholar

Safont Jordà, M. P. 2003. Metapragmatic awareness and pragmatic production of third language learners of English: A focus on request acts realizations. International Journal of Bilingualism 7(1), 43–68. doi:10.1177/13670069030070010401.Google Scholar

Sanders, M. & Meijers, G. 1995. English as L3 in the elementary school. ITL: Review of Applied Linguistics 107−108, 59−78.Google Scholar

Sanz, C. 2000. Bilingual education enhances third language acquisition: Evidence from Catalonia. Applied Psycholinguistics 21, 23–44.Google Scholar

Sanz, C. 2012. Multilingualism and metalinguistic awareness. In Chapelle, C. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, 3933–3942. Oxford: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Siemund, P. 2018. Speech Acts and Clause Types. English in a Cross-Linguistic Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Siemund, P., Schröter, S. & Rahbari, S. 2018. Learning English demonstrative pronouns on bilingual substrate: Evidence from German heritage speakers of Russian, Turkish, and Vietnamese. In Bonnet, A. & Siemund, P. (eds.), Foreign Language Education in Multilingual Classrooms, 381−405. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Siemund, P., Al-Issa, A. and Leimgruber, J. 2020. Multilingualism and the role of English in the United Arab Emirates. World Englishes 2020;1–14. doi: 10.1111/weng.12507Google Scholar

Siemund, P., Schulz, M. E. & Schweinberger, M. 2014. Studying the linguistic ecology of Singapore: A comparison of college and university students. World Englishes 33(3), 340–362.Google Scholar

Spellerberg, S. 2016. Metalinguistic awareness and academic achievement in a linguistically diverse school setting: A study of lower secondary pupils in Denmark. International Journal of Multilingualism 13(1), 19−39, doi: 10.1080/14790718.2015.1053891.Google Scholar

Anderson, Anne H., Bader, Miles, Bard, Ellen Gurman, Boyle, Elizabeth, Doherty, Gwyneth, Garrod, Simon, Isard, Stephen, Kowtko, Jacqueline, McAllister, Jan, Miller, Jim, Sotillo, Catherine, Thompson, Henry S. & Weinert, Regina. 1991. The HCRC Map Task Corpus. Language and Speech 34(4), 351–366.Google Scholar

Altieri, Nicholas, Gruenenfelder, Thomas & Pisoni, David B.. 2010. Clustering coefficients of lexical neighborhoods: Does neighborhood structure matter in spoken word recognition? The Mental Lexicon 5(1), 1–21.Google Scholar

Bartlett, Frederic C. 1932 [reissued 1995]. Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bobrow, Daniel G. & Collins, Allan (eds.). 1975. Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2016. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.16. www.praat.org/ (retrieved 6 April 2016).Google Scholar

Brown, Adam. 1989. Some thoughts on intelligibility. The English Teacher XVIII. www.melta.org.my/ET/1989/main4.html (16 January 2016).Google Scholar

Brown, Gillian & Yule, George. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Byrd, Dani & Mintz, Toben H.. 2010. Discovering Speech, Words, and Mind. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Catford, John C. 1950. Intelligibility. English Language Teaching 5(1), 7–15.Google Scholar

Catford, John C. 1965. A Linguistic Theory of Translation: An Essay in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dascal, Marcelo. 1999. Introduction: Some questions about misunderstanding. Journal of Pragmatics 31(6), 753–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drager, Kathryn D. R., Clark-Serpentine, Elizabeth A., Johnson, Kate E. & Roeser, Jennifer L.. 2006. Accuracy of repetition of digitized and synthesized speech for young children in background noise. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 15(2), 155–164.Google Scholar

Deterding, David. 2013. Misunderstandings in English as a Lingua Franca. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Deterding, David & Sharbawi, Salbrina. 2013. Brunei English: A New Variety in a Multilingual Society. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Deterding, David & Kirkpatrick, Andy. 2006. Emerging South-East Asian Englishes and intelligibility. World Englishes 25(3–4), 391–409.Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod & Barkhuizen, Gary P.. 2005. Analysing Learner Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fetzer, Anita. 2004. Recontextualizing Context: Grammaticality Meets Appropriateness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Field, John. 2004. An insight into listeners' problems: Too much bottom-up or too much top-down? System 32(3), 363–377.Google Scholar

Field, John. 2008. Listening in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Firth, John R. 1957. Papers in Linguistics: 1934–1951. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Firth, Alan. 1996. The discursive accomplishment of normality: On ‘lingua franca’ English and conversation analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 26(2), 237–259.Google Scholar

Garcia, Jane M. & Cannito, Michael P.. 1996. Influence of verbal and nonverbal contexts on the sentence intelligibility of a speaker with dysarthria. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 39(4), 750–760.Google Scholar

Gass, Susan M. & Varonis, Evangeline M.. 1984. The effect of familiarity on the comprehensibility of nonnative speech. Language Learning 34(1), 65–87.Google Scholar

Gass, Susan M. & Varonis, Evangeline M.. 1991. Miscommunication in nonnative speaker discourse. In Coupland, Nikolas, Giles, Howard & Wiemann, John M. (eds.), "Miscommunication" and problematic talk, 121–145. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications .Google Scholar

Gass, Susan M. & Mackey, Alison. 2000. Stimulated Recall Methodology in Second Language Research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Grønnum, Nina. 2009. A Danish phonetically annotated spontaneous speech corpus (DanPASS). Speech Communication 51(7), 594–603.Google Scholar

Gumperz, John J. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gureckis, Todd M. & Goldstone, Robert L. 2011. Schema. In Hogan, Patrick C. (ed.), The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences, 725–727. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gu, Peter Y., Hu, Guangwei & Zhang, Lawrence J.. 2005. Investigating language learner strategies among lower primary school pupils in Singapore. Language and Education 19(4), 281–303.Google Scholar

Hansen, Christa & Jensen, Christine. 1994. Evaluating lecture comprehension. In Flowerdew, John (ed.), Academic Listening: Research Perspectives, 241–268. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. 1999. The notion of ‘context’ in language education. In Ghadessy, Mohsen (ed.), Text and Context in Functional Linguistics, 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Hustad, Katherine C. & Beukelman, David R.. 2001. Effects of linguistic cues and stimulus cohesion on intelligibility of severely dysarthric speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 44, 497–510.Google Scholar

Hymes, Dell. 1977. Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar

Jenkins, Jennifer. 2000. The Phonology of English as an International Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kaur, Jagdish. 2011. Intercultural communication in English as a lingua franca: Some sources of misunderstanding. Intercultural Pragmatics 8(1), 93–116.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Sara. 2012. When non-native speakers misunderstand each other: Identifying important aspects of pronunciation. Contact 38(2), 49–62.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Sara. 2017. Using stimulated recall to explore the use of communication strategies in English lingua franca interactions. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 6(1), 1–27.Google Scholar

Luce, Paul A. & Pisoni, David B.. 1998. Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing 19(1), 1–36.Google Scholar

Luchini, Pedro L. & Kennedy, Sara. 2013. Exploring sources of phonological unintelligibility in spontaneous speech. International Journal of English and Literature 4(3), 79–88.Google Scholar

Linell, Per. 1995. Troubles with mutualities: Towards a dialogical theory of misunderstanding and miscommunication. In Marková, Ivana, Graumann, Carl F. & Foppa, Klaus (eds.), Mutualities in Dialogue, 176–213. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Linell, Per. 2015. Mishearings are occasioned by contextual assumptions and situational affordances. Language & Communication 40, 24–37.Google Scholar

Magnuson, James S. 2017. Mapping spoken words to meaning. In Gaskell, M. Gareth & Mirkovic, Jelena (eds.), Speech Perception and Spoken Word Recognition, 76–96. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mauranen, Anna. 2006. Signaling and preventing misunderstanding in English as lingua franca communication. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2006(177), 123–150.Google Scholar

Minsky, Marvin. 1975. A framework for representing knowledge. In Winston, Patric H. (ed.), The Psychology of Computer Vision, 211–277. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Osimk, Ruth. 2009. Decoding sounds: An experimental approach to intelligibility in ELF. Vienna English Working Papers 18(1), 64–89.Google Scholar

Pickering, Lucy. 2009. Intonation as a pragmatic resource in ELF interaction. Intercultural Pragmatics 6(2), 235–255.Google Scholar

Pietikäinen, Kaisa S. 2018. Misunderstandings and ensuring understanding in private ELF talk. Applied Linguistics 39(2), 188–212.Google Scholar

Pisoni, David B. & McLennan, Conor T.. 2016. Spoken word recognition: Historical roots, current theoretical issues, and some new directions. In Hickok, Gregory & Small, Steven L. (eds.), Neurobiology of Language, 239–253. Tokio: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Pitzl, Marie-Luise. 2010. English as a Lingua Franca in International Business: Resolving Miscommunication and Reaching Shared Understanding. Saarbrücken: VDM Müller.Google Scholar

Rumelhart, David E. 1980. Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In Spiro, Rand J., Bruce, Bertram C. & Brewer, William F. (eds.), Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension, 33–58. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Schank, Roger C. & Abelson, Robert P.. 1975. Scripts, plans and knowledge. In Johnson-Laird, Philip N. & Wason, Peter C. (eds.), Thinking: Readings in Cognitive Science, 151–157. Tbilisi, USSR.Google Scholar

Seidlhofer, Barbara. 2011. Understanding English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, Larry E. 1992. Spread of English and issues of intelligibility. In Kachru, Braj B. (ed.), The Other Tongue: English across Cultures, 75–90. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah. 1993. What's in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations. In Tannen, Deborah (ed.), Framing in Discourse, 14–56. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah & Wallat, Cynthia. 1993. Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/interview. In Tannen, Deborah (ed.), Framing in Discourse, 57–76. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tsui, Amy B. M. & Fullilove, John. 1998. Bottom-up or top-down processing as a discriminator of L2 listening performance. Applied Linguistics 19(4), 432–451.Google Scholar

van Dijk, Teun. 1977. Text and Context. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Vandergrift, Larry & Goh, Christine C. M.. 2012. Teaching and Learning Second Language Listening: Metacognition in Action. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Vitevitch, Michael S. & Luce, Paul A.. 1999. Probabilistic phonotactics and neighbourhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 40(3), 374–408.Google Scholar

VOICE Project. 2007. Mark-up conventions. VOICE Transcription Conventions [2.1]. www.univie.ac.at/voice/documents/VOICE_mark-up_conventions_v2-1.pdf (14 March 2018).Google Scholar

Warren, Richard M. 1970. Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds. Science 167(3917), 392–393.Google Scholar

Weigand, Edda. 1999. Misunderstanding: The standard case. Journal of Pragmatics 31, 763–785.Google Scholar

Widdowson, Henry G. 1983. Learning Purpose and Language Use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Widdowson, Henry G. 2004. Text, Context, Pretext: Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Widdowson, Henry G. 2011. Context and co-text. In Hogan, Patrick Colm (ed.), The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences, 221–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Zielinski, Beth. 2006. Reduced Intelligibility in L2 Speakers of English. Phd thesis. Bundoora, Victoria: La Trobe University.Google Scholar

Amaghlobeli, Natia. 2012. Linguistic features of typographic emoticons in SMS discourse. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 2(2), 348–354.Google Scholar

Bosso, Rino. 2018. First steps in exploring computer-mediated English as a Lingua Franca. In Martin-Rubió, Xavier (ed.), Contextualizing English as a Lingua Franca: From Data to Insights, 10–35. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar

Derks, Daantje, Bos, Arjan & von Grumbkow, Jasper. 2008. Emoticons and online message interpretation. Social Science Computer Review 26(3), 379–388.Google Scholar

Diemer, Stefan, Brunner, Marie-Louise & Schmidt, Selina. 2016. Compiling computer-mediated spoken language corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21 (3), 348–371.Google Scholar

Dresner, Eli & Herring, Susan. 2010. Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication Theory 20, 249–268.Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. 1976. A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Facebook Newsroom. 2018. Facebook statistics. Available at: http://newsroom.fb.com/company-info/ (last accessed 30 January 2019).Google Scholar

Fairclough, Norman. 2013. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gaved, Mark & Mulholland, Paul. 2005. Grassroots initiated networked communities: A study of hybrid physical/virtual communities. System Sciences, 2005. HICSS '05. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.Google Scholar

Hammersley, Martyn & Atkinson, Paul. 1995. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Herring, Susan C. 2018. The coevolution of computer-mediated communication and computer-mediated discourse analysis. In Patricia, Bou-Franch & Pilar, Garcés-Conejos Blitvich (eds.), Analyzing Digital Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions, 25–67. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hine, Christine. 2000. Virtual Ethnography. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Nina, Hynninen, Pietikäinen, Kaisa & Vetchinnikova, Svetlana. 2017. Multilingualism in English as a lingua franca: Flagging as an indicator of perceived acceptability and intelligibility. In Nurmi, Arja, Rütten, Tanja & Pahta, Päivi (eds.), Challenging the Myth of Monolingual Corpora (Language and Computers 80), 95–126. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Jordan, Brigitte. 2009. Blurring boundaries: The “real” and the “virtual” in hybrid spaces. Human Organization: Summer 2009 68(2), 181–193.Google Scholar

Kaur, Jagdish. 2009. Pre-empting problems of understanding in English as a Lingua Franca. In Mauranen, Anna & Ranta, Elina (eds.), English as a Lingua Franca: Studies and Findings, 107–123. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar

Konakahara, Mayu. 2016. The use of unmitigated disagreement in ELF casual conversation: Ensuring mutual understanding by providing correct information. In Murata, Kumiko (ed.), Exploring ELF in Japanese Academic and Business Contexts: Conceptualization, Research and Pedagogic Implications, 70–89. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mauranen, Anna. 2006. Signaling and preventing misunderstanding in English as lingua franca communication. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 177, 123–150.Google Scholar

Mauranen, Anna. 2013. Hybridism, edutainment, and doubt: Science blogging finding its feet. Nordic Journal of English Studies 13(1), 7–36.Google Scholar

Navarrete, Celene, Huerta, Esperanza & Horan, Thomas. 2008. Social place identity in hybrid communities. In Aurigi, Alessandro & De Cindio, Fiorella (eds.), Augmented Urban Spaces: Articulating the Physical and Electronic City, 125–137. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar

Pietikäinen, Kaisa. 2018. Misunderstandings and ensuring understanding in private ELF talk. Applied Linguistics 39(2), 188–212.Google Scholar

Seidlhofer, Barbara. 2011. Understanding English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Vettorel, Paola. 2014. English as a Lingua Franca in Wider Networking: Blogging Practices. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Widdowson, Henry. 2004. Text, Context, Pretext: Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Archibald, Alasdair, Cogo, Alessia & Jenkins, Jennifer. 2011. Latest Trends in ELF Research. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar

Auer, Peter. 1984. Bilingual Conversation. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Auer, Peter. 1998. Code-Switching in Conversation: Language, Interaction and Identity. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Brouwer, Catherine E. 2003. Word searches in NNS–NS interaction: Opportunities for language learning? The Modern Language Journal 87(4), 534–545. doi: 10.1111/1540-4781.00206.Google Scholar

Brouwer, Catherine E. 2004. Doing pronunciation: A specific type of repair sequence. In Gardner, Rod & Wagner, Johannes (eds.), Second Language Conversations, 93–113. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Brouwer, Catherine E. & Wagner, Johannes. 2004. Developmental issues in second language conversation. Journal of Applied Linguistics 1(1), 30–47.Google Scholar

Burch, Alfred R. 2014. Pursuing information: A conversation analytic perspective on communication strategies. Language Learning 64(3), 651–684.Google Scholar

Cogo, Alessia. 2009. Accommodating difference in ELF conversations: A study of pragmatic strategies. In Mauranen, Anna & Ranta, Elina E. (eds.), English as a Lingua Franca: Studies and Findings, 254–273. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar

Cogo, Alessia. 2010. Strategic use and perceptions of English as a Lingua Franca. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 46(3), 295–312. doi: 10.2478/v10010-010-0013-7.Google Scholar

Cogo, Alessia. 2012. ELF and super-diversity: A case study of ELF multilingual practices from a business context. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 1(2), 287–313. doi:10.1515/jelf-2012-0020.Google Scholar

Cogo, Alessia. 2017. ELF and multilingualism. In Jenkins, Jennifer, Baker, Will & Dewey, Martin (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca, 357–368. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cogo, Alessia & Dewey, Martin. 2012. Analysing English as a Lingua Franca: A Corpus-Driven Investigation. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Dings, Abby. 2014. Interactional competence and the development of alignment activity. The Modern Language Journal 98(3), 742–756. doi: 10.1111/modl.12120.Google Scholar

Drew, Paul. 1995. Conversation analysis. In Smith, Jonathan A., Hareé, Rom & van Langenhove, Luk (eds.), Rethinking Methods in Psychology, 64–79. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Drew, Paul. 1997. "Open" class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 28(1), 69–101.Google Scholar

Funayama, Izumi. 2002. Word-searches in cross-linguistic settings: Teaching-learning collaboration between native and non-native speakers. Crossroads of Language, Interaction, and Culture 4, 33–57.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. 1983. Searching for a word as an interactive activity. In Deely, John N. & Lenhart, Margot D. (eds.), Semiotics, 129–137. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Marjorie Harness & Goodwin, Charles. 1986. Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica 62(1/2), 51–75.Google Scholar

Greer, Tim. 2008. Accomplishing difference in bilingual interaction: Translation as backwards-oriented medium repair. Multilingua-Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication 27(1–2), 99–127.Google Scholar

Greer, Tim. 2013. Word search sequences in bilingual interaction: Codeswitching and embodied orientation toward shifting participant constellations. Journal of Pragmatics 57, 100–117.Google Scholar

Hauser, Eric. 2013. Stability and change in one adult's second language English negation. Language Learning 63(3), 463–498. doi: 10.1111/lang.12012.Google Scholar

Hellermann, John. 2006. Classroom interactive practices for developing L2 literacy: A microethnographic study of two beginning adult learners of English. Applied Linguistics 27(3), 377–404.Google Scholar

Hellermann, John. 2007. The development of practices for action in classroom dyadic interaction: Focus on task openings. The Modern Language Journal 91(1), 83–96.Google Scholar

Hellermann, John. 2009. Looking for evidence of language learning in practices for repair: A case study of self-initiated self-repair by an adult learner of English. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 53(2), 113–132.Google Scholar

Hellermann, John. 2011. Members' methods, members' competencies: Looking for evidence of language learning in longitudinal investigations of other-initiated repair. In Hall, Joan Kelly, Hellermann, John & Doehler, Simona Pekarek (eds.), L2 Interactional Competence and Development, 147–172. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Hellermann, John & Cole, Elizabeth. 2008. Practices for social interaction in the language-learning classroom: Disengagements from dyadic task Interaction. Applied Linguistics 30(2), 186–215.Google Scholar

Heritage, John. 2012a. The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1), 30–52.Google Scholar

Heritage, John. 2012b. Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1), 1–29.Google Scholar

Hosoda, Yuri. 2006. Repair and relevance of differential language expertise in second language conversations. Applied Linguistics 27(1), 25–50. doi: 10.1093/applin/ami022.Google Scholar

House, Juliane. 2016. Own-language use in academic discourse in English as a lingua franca. In Murata, Kumiko (ed.), Exploring ELF in Japanese Academic and Business Contexts, 59–70. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hülmbauer, Cornelia. 2009. “We don’t take the right way. We just take the way that we think you will understand” – The shifting relationship between correctness and effectiveness in ELF. In Mauranen, Anna & Ranta, Elina E. (eds.), English as a Lingua Franca: Studies and Findings, 323–347. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar

Huth, Thorsten. 2006. Negotiating structure and culture: L2 learners’ realization of L2 compliment-response sequences in talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 38(12), 2025–2050.Google Scholar

Hynninen, Niina, Pietikäinen, Kaisa S. & Vetchinnikova, Svetlana. 2017. Multilingualism in English as a Lingua Franca: Flagging as an indicator of perceived acceptability and intelligibility. In Nurmi, Arja, Rütten, Tanja & Pahta, Päivi (eds.), Challenging the Myth of Monolingual Corpora, 95–126. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Ishida, Midori. 2009. Development of interactional competence: Changes in the use of ne in L2 Japanese during study abroad. In Nguyen, Hanh Thi & Kasper, Gabriele (eds.), Talk-in-Interaction: Multilingual Perspectives, 351–385. Honolulu: National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa.Google Scholar

Ishida, Midori. 2011. Engaging in another person's telling as a recipient in L2 Japanese: Development of interactional competence during one-year study abroad. In Pallotti, Gabriele & Wagner, Johannes (eds.), L2 Learning as Social Practice: Conversation-Analytic Perspectives, 45–86. Honolulu: National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa.Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 1972. Side sequences. In Sudnow, David (ed.), Studies in Social Interaction, 294–338. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Lerner, Gene H. (ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, 13–23. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jenkins, Jennifer. 2015. Repositioning English and multilingualism in English as a lingua franca. Englishes in Practice 2(3), 49–85.Google Scholar

Kalocsai, Karolina. 2009. Erasmus exchange students: A behind-the-scenes view into an ELF community of practice. Apples – Journal of Applied Language Studies 3(1), 25–49.Google Scholar

Kalocsai, Karolina. 2011. The show of interpersonal involvement and the building of rapport in an ELF community of practice. In Archibald, Alasdair, Cogo, Alessia & Jenkins, Jennifer (eds.), Latest Trends in English as a Lingua Franca Research, 113–138. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar

Kamio, Akio. 1994. The theory of territory of information: The case of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 21(1), 67–100.Google Scholar

Kamio, Akio. 1997. Territory of Information. Vol. 48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Kärkkäinen, Elise. 2003. Epistemic Stance in English Conversation, Pragmatics and Beyond New Series. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klimpfinger, Theresa. 2007. “Mind you sometimes you have to mix” – The role of code-switching in English as a lingua franca. Vienna English Working Papers 16(2), 36–61.Google Scholar

Klimpfinger, Theresa. 2009. “She’s mixing the two languages together” – Forms and functions of code-switching in English as a Lingua Franca. In Mauranen, Anna & Ranta, Elina (eds.), English as a Lingua Franca: Studies and Findings, 348–371. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar

Kurhila, Salla. 2006. Second Language Interaction. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Mauranen, Anna. 2012. Exploring ELF: Academic English Shaped by Non-Native Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mauranen, Anna. 2014. Lingua franca discourse in academic contexts: Shaped by complexity. In Flowerdew, John (ed.), Discourse in Context: Contemporary Applied Linguistics, 225–245. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar

Mauranen, Anna & Mauko, Ida. 2019. ELF among multilingual practices in a trialingual university. In Jenkins, Jennifer & Mauranen, Anna (eds.), Linguistic Diversity on the EMI Campus: Insider Accounts of the Use of English and Other Languages in Universities within Asia, Australasia, and Europe. Abingdon & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mazeland, Harrie & Zaman-Zadeh, Minna. 2004. The logic of clarification: Some observations about word-clarification repairs in Finnish-as-a-lingua-franca interactions. In Gardner, Rod & Wagner, Johannes (eds.), Second Language Conversations, 132–156. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Mori, Junko & Hasegawa, Atsushi. 2009. Doing being a foreign language learner in a classroom: Embodiment of cognitive states as social events. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 47(1), 65–94. doi: 10.1515/iral.2009.004.Google Scholar

Pekarek Doehler, Simona & Pochon-Berger, Evelyne. 2011. Developing “methods” for interaction: A cross-sectional study of disagreement sequences in French L2. In Hall, Joan Kelly, Hellermann, John & Doehler, Simona Pekarek (eds.), L2 Interactional Competence and Development, 206–243. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Pietikäinen, Kaisa S. 2014. ELF couples and automatic code-switching. Journal of English as a lingua franca 3(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pietikäinen, Kaisa S. 2017. English as a Lingus Franca in Intercultural Relationships: Interaction, Identity, and Multilingual Practices of ELF Couples. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Department of Modern Languages, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar

Pitzl, Marie-Luise. 2016. World Englishes and creative idioms in English as a lingua franca. World Englishes 35(2), 293–309. doi: 10.1111/weng.12196.Google Scholar

Pölzl, Ulrike. 2003. Signalling cultural identity: The use of L1/Ln in ELF. View [z]–Vienna English Working Papers 12(2), 3–23.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana. 2001. Code-switching (linguistic). In Smelser, Neil J. and Baltes, Paul B. (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2062–2065. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raymond, Geoffrey & Heritage, John. 2006. The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Language in Society 35(5), 677–705. doi: 10.1017/S0047404506060325.Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel & Jefferson, Gail. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4), 696–735.Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel. 1984. On some gestures’ relation to talk. In Maxwell Atkinson, J. & Heritage, John (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, 266–296. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel, Jefferson, Gail & Sacks, Harvey. 1977. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53(2), 361–382.Google Scholar

Seedhouse, Paul. 2004. The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom: A Conversation Analysis Perspective. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Seidlhofer, Barbara. 2011. Understanding English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Smit, Ute. 2010. English as a Lingua Franca in Higher education: A Longitudinal Study of Classroom Discourse. Vol. 2. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Svennevig, Jan. 2008. Trying the easiest solution first in other-initiation of repair. Journal of Pragmatics 40(2), 333–348.Google Scholar

Watanabe, Aya. 2017. Developing L2 interactional competence: Increasing participation through self-selection in post-expansion sequences. Classroom Discourse 8(3), 271–293.Google Scholar

Young, Richard F. & Miller, Elizabeth R.. 2004. Learning as changing participation: Discourse roles in ESL writing conferences. The Modern Language Journal 88, 519–535.Google Scholar

Blackledge, Adrian & Creese, Angela. 2010. Multilingualism. A Critical Perspective. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Blommaert, Jan. 2010. The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blommaert, Jan. 2012. Complexity, accent and conviviality: Concluding comments. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies 26, Tilburg: Tilburg University.Google Scholar

Blommaert, Jan & Backus, Ad. 2011. Repertoires revisited: ‘Knowing language’ in superdiversity. Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies 67.Google Scholar

Blommaert, Jan & Rampton, Ben. 2011. Language and superdiversity: a position paper. Available at www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp/departments/education/research/Research-Centres/ldc/publications/workingpapers/abstracts/WP070-Language-and-superdiversity-a-position-paper-.aspx.Google Scholar

Cenoz, Jasone & Gorter, Durk. 2011. A holistic approach to multilingual education: Introduction. Modern Language Journal, 95(3), 339–343.Google Scholar

Cogo, Alessia. 2009. Accommodating difference in ELF conversations: A study of pragmatic strategies. In Mauranen, Anna & Ranta, Elina (eds.), English as a Lingua Franca: Studies and Findings, 254–273. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar

Cogo, Alessia. 2012. ELF and super-diversity: A case study of ELF multilingual practices from a business context. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 1(2), 287–313.Google Scholar

Cogo, Alessia. 2016a. Conceptualizing ELF as a translanguaging phenomenon: covert and overt resources in a transnational workplace. WASEDA Working Papers in ELF (English as a Lingua Franca) 5, 61–77.Google Scholar

Cogo, Alessia. 2016b. Visibility and absence: Ideologies of ‘diversity’ in BELF. In Pitzl, Marie-Luise & Osimk-Teasdale, Ruth (eds.), English as a Lingua Franca: Perspectives and Prospects. Contributions in Honour of Barbara Seidlhofer , 39–48. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Cogo, Alessia. 2018. ELF and Multilingualism. The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca. London: Routledge, 357–368.Google Scholar

Conteh, Jean. 2018 Translanguaging as pedagogy: A critical review. In Creese, Angela & Blackledge, Adrian (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Superdiversity, 473–487. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Conteh, Jean. 2019. Translanguaging. Key concepts in ELT. ELT Journal 72(4), 445–447.Google Scholar

Conteh, Jean & Brock, Avril. 2011. ‘Safe spaces’? Sites of bilingualism for young learners in home, school and community. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 14(3), 347–360.Google Scholar

Copland, Fiona & Creese, Angela. 2015. Linguistic Ethnography: Collecting, Analysing and Presenting Data. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Creese, Angela & Blackledge, Adrian. 2010. Translanguaging in the bilingual classroom: A pedagogy for learning and teaching? Modern Language Journal 94(1), 103–115.Google Scholar

Dorn, Nora, Rienzner, Martina, Busch, Brigitta & Santner-Wolfartsberger, Anita. 2014. ‘Here I Find Myself to Be Judged’: ELF/Plurilingual Perspectives on Language Analysis for the Determination of Origin. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 3(2), 409–424.Google Scholar

García, Ofelia. 2009. Education, multilingualism and translanguaging in the 21st century. In Mohanty, Ajit, Panda, Minati, Phillipson, Robert & Skutnabb-Kangas, Tove (eds.) Multilingual Education for Social Justice: Globalising the local, 128–145. New Delhi: Orient Blackswan (formerly Orient Longman).Google Scholar

García, Ofelia & Li, Wei. 2014. Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Grosjean, François. 1982. Life with Two Languages: An Introduction to Bilingualism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Guido, Maria Grazia. 2012. ELF authentication and accommodation strategies in crosscultural immigration encounters. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 1(2), 219–240.Google Scholar

Heller, Monica (ed.). 2007. Bilingualism: A Social Approach. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Jenkins, Jennifer. 2015. Repositioning English and multilingualism in English as a Lingua Franca. Englishes in Practice 2(3), 49–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, Gwyn, Jones, Bryn & Baker, Colin. 2012. Translanguaging: Origins and development from school to street and beyond. Educational Research and Evaluation 18(7), 641–654.Google Scholar

Li, Wei. 2011. Moment Analysis and translanguaging space: Discursive construction of identities by multilingual Chinese youth in Britain. Journal of Pragmatics 43(5), 1222–1235.Google Scholar

Mauranen, Anna. 2012. Exploring ELF in Academia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mauranen, Anna. 2013. Lingua franca discourse in academic contexts: Shaped by complexity. In Flowerdew, John (ed.), Discourse in Context: Contemporary Applied Linguistics. Vol. 3, 225–245. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Seidlhofer, Barbara. 2011. Understanding English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Vettorel, Paola. 2014. English as a Lingua in Wider Networking: Blogging Practices. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Granovetter, Mark. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78(6), 1360–1380.Google Scholar

Hynninen, Niina, Pietikäinen, Kaisa S. & Vetchinnikova, Svetlana. 2017. Multilingualism in English as a Lingua Franca: Flagging as an indicator of perceived acceptability and intelligibility. In Nurmi, Arja, Rütten, Tanja and Pahta, Päivi (eds.), Challenging the Myth of Monolingual Corpora, 95–126. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Mauranen, Anna. 2012. Exploring ELF: Academic English Shaped by Non-Native Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Milroy, James & Milroy, Lesley. 1985. Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics 21, 339–384.Google Scholar