Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-rn2sj Total loading time: 0.966 Render date: 2022-08-14T19:05:43.414Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2022

Edited and translated by
Jörg Noller
Affiliation:
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munchen
John Walsh
Affiliation:
Martin Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Germany
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Abicht, Johann Heinrich. 1789. “Ueber die Freyheit des Willens” (“On the Freedom of the Will”). Abicht, J. H. and Born, F. G, eds., Neues Philosophisches Magazin 1, part i(iii), 6485.Google Scholar
Ariew, Roger, and Garber, Daniel. 1989. G. W. Leibniz, Philosophical Essays. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Basedow, Johann Bernhard. 1764. Methodischer Unterricht der Jugend in der Religion und Sittenlehre der Vernunft (Methodical Instruction of the Youth in the Religion and Ethics of Reason). Altona: David Iversen.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. 1740. Ethica philosophica (Philosophical Ethics). Halle.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb 4 1757. Metaphysica Alexandri Gottlieb Baumgarten (Metaphysics). Halle and Magdeburg: Carl Hermann Hemmerde.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb 1760. Initia philosophiae practicae primae. Halle.Google Scholar
Creuzer, Leonhard. 1793. Skeptische Betrachtungen über die Freyheit des Willens mit Hinsicht auf die neuesten Theorien über dieselbe (Skeptical Reflections on Freedom of the Will with Respect to the Most Recent Theories on the Same). Giessen: Georg Friedrich Heyer.Google Scholar
Christian August, Crusius. 1744. Anweisung vernünftig zu leben, Darinnen nach Erklärung der Natur des menschlichen Willens die natürlichen Pflichten und allgemeinen Klugheitsregeln im richtigen Zusammenhange vorgetragen werden (Guide to Rational Living). Leipzig: Johann Friedrich Gleditsch.Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. 1793. “Rezension von Creuzers ‘Skeptischen Betrachtungen über die Freyheit des Willens’” (“Review of Creuzer’s Skeptical Reflections on Freedom of the Will”). Allgemeine Literatur-Zeitung 303, cols. 201–205. “Review of Leonhard Creuzer, Skeptical Reflections on the Freedom of the Will (1793),” translated by Daniel Breazeale. Philosophical Forum 32(4) (Winter 2001), 289296.Google Scholar
Forberg, Friedrich Carl. 1795. Ueber die Gründe und Gesetze freyer Handlungen (On the Grounds and Laws of Free Actions). Jena and Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth.Google Scholar
Fugate, Courtney D., and Hymers, John. 2013. Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten, Metaphysics: A Critical Translation with Kant’s Elucidations, Selected Notes, and Related Materials. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Gawlick, Gunter, Kreimendahl, Lothar, and Stark, Werner, eds. 2019. Immanuel Kant, Neue Reflexionen. Die frühen Notate zu Baumgartens “Metaphysica.” Forschungen und Materialien zur deutschen Aufklärung i: Texte. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Heydenreich, August Christian, Ludwig. 1793. Über Freiheit und Determinismus und ihre Vereinigung (On Freedom and Determinism and Their Compatibility). Erlangen: Johann Jakob Palm.Google Scholar
Heydenreich, Karl Heinrich. 1791. “Über die moralische Freiheit” (“On Moral Freedom”). In Betrachtungen über die Philosophie der natürlichen Religion. 2 vols, vol. ii, 5669. Leipzig: Weygandsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Hommel, Carl Ferdinand (alias Alexander von Joch). 1772 (11770). Über Belohnung und Bestrafung nach türkischen Gesetzen (Concerning Reward and Punishment According to Turkish Laws). Baireuth and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1793. Untersuchung über den menschlichen Verstand, neu übersetzt von M. W. G. Tennemann nebst einer Abhandlung über den philosophischen Skeptizismus von Herrn Professor Reinhold in Jena. Jena: Akademische Buchhandlung. An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding. Edited and with an introduction and notes by Peter Millican. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Jacobi, Friedrich Heinrich. 1787. Ueber den Transcendentalen Idealismus (On Transcendental Idealism). In David Hume über den Glauben oder Idealismus und Realismus. Ein Gespräch von Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi, 209230. Breslau: Gottlieb Loewe.Google Scholar
Jakob, Ludwig Heinrich von. 1787. “An den Hrn. Prof. Cäsar” (“To Prof. Cäsar”). In Cäsar, Karl Adolph, ed., Denkwürdigkeiten aus der philosophischen Welt, vol. v, 226243. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Jakob, Ludwig Heinrich von 1788a. Grundriß der allgemeinen Logik und kritische Anfangsgründe zu einer allgemeinen Metaphysik (Outline of General Logic and Critical Foundations to a Universal Metaphysics). Halle: Franke & Bispink.Google Scholar
Jakob, Ludwig Heinrich von 1788b. “Über Freiheit” (“On Freedom”). In Kiesewetter, Johann Gottfried Karl Christian, Ueber den ersten Grundsatz der Moralphilosophie, 328. Leipzig, Eisleben, and Halle: Fried. Christian Dreyzig.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1755. Principiorum primorum cognitionis metaphysicae nova dilucidatio. Ak. 1:385416. New Elucidation of the First Principles of Metaphysical Cognition. In Walford, David, ed. and transl., Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770, 145. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1756. Neue Anmerkungen zur Erläuterung der Theorie der Winde. Ak. 1:489503. New Notes to Explain the Theory of the Winds. In Watkins, Eric, ed., Kant: Natural Science, 374385. Translated by Olaf Reinhardt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1781, 1787. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Riga: Johann Friedrich Hartknoch, A and B respectively.Critique of Pure Reason. Edited and translated by Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1785. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Ak. 4:385463. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Edited and translated by Gregor, Mary J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1786. Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft. Ak. 4:465565. Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Edited and translated by Friedman, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1788a. Kraus’ Recension von Ulrichs Eleutheriologie. Ak. 8:451460. Kraus’ Review of Ulrich’s “Eleutheriology”. In Kant, Immanuel, Practical Philosophy. Edited and translated by Gregor, Mary J., 119131. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1788b. Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Ak. 5:1163.Critique of Practical Reason. Edited and translated by Gregor, Mary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1790. Kritik der Urteilskraft. Ak. 5:165485. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Edited and translated by Guyer, Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1793. Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft. Ak. 6:1202. Religion within the boundaries of mere reason. In Religion and Rational Theology. Edited by Wood, Allen W. and Di Giovanni, G. and translated by G. Di Giovanni, 39–215. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1797a. Die Metaphysik der Sitten. Ak. 6:203293. The Metaphysics of Morals. Introduction, translation, and notes by Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1797b. Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre. Metaphysical Foundations of the Doctrine of Right. In The Metaphysics of Morals. Introduction, translation, and notes by Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. Metaphysical Elements of Justice. Introduction, translation, and notes by John Ladd. Cambridge, MA: Hackett, 1999.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1797c. Vorarbeiten zur Vorrede und Einleitung in die Metaphysik der Sitten (Preliminary Notes and Reflections to the Introduction of the Metaphysics of Morals). Ak. 23:243252.Google Scholar
Kiesewetter, Johann Christian, Gottfried Karl. 1791. Ueber den ersten Grundsatz der Moralphilosophie. Zweiter Theil welcher die Darstellung und Prüfung des Kantischen Moralprinzips enthält (On the First Principle of Moral Philosophy). Berlin: Carl Matzdorff.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1710. Theodicy. Edited by Farrer, Austin and translated by E. M. Huggard. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm 1765. New Essays on Human Understanding. Translated and edited by Remnant, Peter and Bennet, Jonathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm 18751890. Philosophische Schriften. Edited by Gerhardt, Carl Immanuel. 7 vols. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Maimon, Salomon. 1793. Streifereien im Gebiete der Philosophie (Forays in the Area of Philosophy), first part. Berlin: Wilhelm Vieweg.Google Scholar
Maimon, Salomon 1800. “Der moralische Skeptiker” (“The Moral Skeptic”). Berlinisches Archiv der Zeit und ihres Geschmacks 2, 271292.Google Scholar
Pistorius, Hermann Andreas.1784. “Rezension von I. Kants Prolegomena” (“Review of I. Kant’s Prolegomena”). Allgemeine deutsche Bibliothek 59(2), 322356.Google Scholar
Pistorius, Hermann 1786. “Erläuterungen über des Herrn Professor Kant Critik der reinen Vernunft von Joh. Schultze, Königl. Preußischem Hofprediger. Königsberg 1784” (Review of Elucidations of Professor Kant’s “Critique of Pure Reason” by Joh. Schulze, Royal Prussian Court Chaplain. Königsberg: Dengel, 1784). Allgemeine deutsche Bibliothek 66(1), 92123.Google Scholar
Ploucquet, Wilhelm Gottfried. 1778. Elementa philosophiae contemplativae (Elements of Contemplative Philosophy). Stuttgart: Johann Benedikt Metzler.Google Scholar
Rehberg, August Wilhelm. 1788. “Rezension von Kants ‘Kritik der praktischen Vernunft’” (“Review of Kant’s ‘Critique of Practical Reason’”). Allgemeine Literatur-Zeitung 188a and 188b, cols. 345–352 and 353–360.Google Scholar
Reinhold, Karl Leonhard. 1789. Versuch einer neuen Theorie des menschlichen Vorstellungsvermögens (Attempt at a New Theory of the Human Faculty of Representation). Prague and Jena: Widtmann & Mauke.Google Scholar
Reinhold, Karl Leonhard 1790, 1794. Beyträge zur Berichtigung bisheriger Missverständnisse der Philosophen (Contributions to the Correction of Previous Misunderstandings of Philosophers). Volumes i and ii. Jena: Johann Michael Mauke.Google Scholar
Reinhold, Karl Leonhard 1792. Briefe über die Kantische Philosophie (Letters on the Kantian Philosophy). Volume ii. Leipzig: Georg Joachim Göschen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhold, Karl Leonhard 1797. “Einige Bemerkungen über die in der Einleitung zu den Metaphysischen Anfangsgründender Rechtslehre von I. Kant aufgestellten Begriffe von der Freyheit des Willens” (“Some Remarks on the Concept of the Freedom of the Will, posed by I. Kant in the Introduction to the Metaphysical Foundations of the Doctrine of Right”). In Auswahl vermischter Schriften, second part, 364400. Jena: Johann Michael Mauke.Google Scholar
Sassen, Brigitte. 2000. Kant’s Early Critics: The Empiricist Critique of the Theoretical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schelling, Friedrich Joseph, Wilhelm. 1795. Vom Ich als Prinzip der Philosophie oder über das Unbedingte im menschlichen Wissen (Of the I as Principle of Philosophy or on the Unconditional in Human Knowledge). Tübingen: Jakob Friedrich Heerbrandt.Google Scholar
Schelling, Friedrich 1797. “Allgemeine Übersicht über die neueste philosophische Literatur” (“General Overview of the Most Recent Philosophical Literature”). Philosophisches Journal 7(2) (Jena and Leipzig), 105186.Google Scholar
Schmid, Carl Erhard, Christian. 1788. Wörterbuch zum leichtern Gebrauch der kantischen Schriften (Lexicon for the Easier Use of the Kantian Writings). Jena: Cröker.Google Scholar
Schmid, Carl 1 1790/2 1792. Versuch einer Moralphilosophie (Attempt at a Moral Philosophy). Jena: Cröker.Google Scholar
Schulze, Gottlob Ernst. 1792. Aenesidemus oder über die Fundamente der von Herrn Professor Reinhold in Jena gelieferten Elementar-Philosophie. Nebst einer Verteidigung des Skeptizismus gegen die Anmaßungen der Vernunftkritik (Aenesidemus or on the Foundations of the Elementary Philosophy Provided by Professor Reinhold in Jena). N.p.Google Scholar
Schwab, Johann Christoph. 1792a.“Über die zweierlei Ich, und den Begriff der Freiheit in der Kantischen Moral” (“On the Two Kinds of I, and the Concept of Freedom in Kant’s Ethics”).Philosophisches Archiv 1(1), 6980.Google Scholar
Schwab, Johann Christoph 1792b. “Ueber eine ungerechte Beschuldigung der Leibnitzischen Lehre von der besten Welt in hrn. Professor Schmidts Moral-Philosophie” (“On an Unjust Accusation of Leibniz’ Doctrine of the Best World in Mr. Professor Schmidt’s Moral Philosophy”). Philosophisches Archiv 1(3), 4862.Google Scholar
Schwab, Johann Christoph 1794. “Ueber den intelligiblen Fatalismus in der kritischen Philosophie” (“On Intelligible Fatalism in the Critical Philosophy”). Philosophisches Archiv 2(2), 2633.Google Scholar
Snell, Christian Wilhelm. 1789. Über Determinismus und moralische Freiheit (On Determinism and Moral Freedom). Offenbach: Ulrich Weiß & Carl Ludwig Brede.Google Scholar
Ulrich, Johann Heinrich, August. 1788. Eleutheriologie oder über Freyheit und Nothwendigkeit (Eleutheriology or On Freedom and Necessity). Jena: Cröker.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. 1720a. Deutsche Ethik (German Ethics) (Vernünfftige Gedancken von der Menschen Thun und Lassen, zu Beförderung ihrer Glückseligkeit). Halle: Renger.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian 1720b. Deutsche Metaphysik (German Metaphysics) (Vernünftige Gedancken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, auch allen Dingen überhaupt). Halle: Renger.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian 1738. Psychologia Empirica. Frankfurt and Leipzig: Renger.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Allison, Henry. 1990. Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry 2002. “Editor’s Introduction to ‘What Real Progress has Metaphysics Made in Germany Since the Time of Leibniz and Wolff’.” In Kant, Immanuel, Theoretical Philosophy after 1781. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry 2011. Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry 2018. “Freedom of the Will in Baumgarten and Kant’s ML1.” In Fugate, Courtney D. and Hymers, John, eds., Baumgarten and Kant on Metaphysics, 171181. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. 2000. Kant and the Fate of Autonomy: Problems in the Appropriation of the Critical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl 2003. Interpreting Kant’s Critiques. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl 2012. “Ambiguities in the Will: Reinhold and Kant, Briefe II.” In Stolz, Violetta, Heinz, Marion, and Bondeli, Martin, eds., Wille, Willkür, Freiheit: Reinholds Freiheitskonzeption im Kontext der Philosophie des 18. Jahrhunderts, 7189. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacin, Stefano. 2015. “Kant’s Lectures on Ethics and Baumgarten’s Moral philosophy.” In Denis, Lara and Sensen, Oliver, eds., Kant’s Lectures on Ethics: A Critical Guide, 1533. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, Manfred. 2012. “Kants Replik auf Reinhold.” In Stolz, Violetta, Heinz, Marion, and Bondeli, Martin, eds., Wille, Willkür, Freiheit: Reinholds Freiheitskonzeption im Kontext der Philosophie des 18. Jahrhunderts, 153163. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Lewis White, . 1960. A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis White, 1987. “Five Concepts of Freedom in Kant.” In Srzednicki, Jan T. J., ed., Stephan Körner – Philosophical Analysis and Reconstruction, 3551. Contributions to Philosophy 28. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, Frederick. 1987. The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan. 1984. “Kant’s Theory of Freedom.” In Wood, Allen, ed., Self and Nature in Kant’s Philosophy, 102112. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bojanowski, Jochen. 2006. Kants Theorie der Freiheit: Rekonstruktion und Rehabilitierung. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bondeli, Martin. 2001. “Freiheit im Anschluss an Kant: Zur Kant-Reinhold-Kontroverse und ihren Folgen.” In Gerhard, Volker, Horstmann, Rolf-Peter, and Schumacher, Ralph, eds., Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung: Akten des IX. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, 243251. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bondeli, Martin 2008. “Einleitung.” In Reinhold, Karl Leonhard, Briefe über die Kantische Philosophie, volume ii, edited by Bondeli, Martin, viilxxxvi. Basel: Schwabe.Google Scholar
Bondeli, Martin 2012. “Zu Reinholds Auffassung von Willensfreiheit in den Briefen II.” In Stolz, Violetta, Heinz, Marion, and Bondeli, Martin, eds., Wille, Willkür, Freiheit: Reinholds Freiheitskonzeption im Kontext der Philosophie des 18. Jahrhunderts, 125152. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bondeli, Martin 2018. “Freiheit, Gewissen und Gesetz. Zu Reinholds und Kants Disput über Willensfreiheit.” In Waibel, Violetta L., Ruffing, Margit, and Wagner, David, eds., Natur und Freiheit: Akten des XII. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, vol. i, 529544. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breazeale, Daniel. 2012. “The Fate of Kantian Freedom: One Cheer (More) for Reinhold.” In Stolz, Violetta, Heinz, Marion, and Bondeli, Martin, eds., Wille, Willkür, Freiheit: Reinholds Freiheitskonzeption im Kontext der Philosophie des 18. Jahrhunderts, 91123. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cafagna, Emanuele. 2018a.“Der Angriff von Ulrichs Determinismus und die Replik von Kraus und Kant.” In Falduto, Antonino and Klemme, Heiner, eds., Kant und seine Kritiker, 1328. Hildesheim: Georg Oms.Google Scholar
Cafagna, Emanuele 2018b. “Kants Begriff der Freiheit in der Nova Dilucidatio.” In Waibel, Violetta L., Ruffing, Margit, and Wagner, David, eds., Natur und Freiheit: Akten des XII. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, vol. ii, 847855. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnois, Bernard. 1987. The Coherence of Kant’s Doctrine of Freedom. Transl. David Booth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cross, Richard. 2010. “Weakness and Grace.” In Pasnau, Robert, ed., The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy, vol. i, 441453. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Di Giovanni, George. 2001. “Rehberg, Reinhold und C. C. E. Schmid über Kant und die moralische Freiheit.” In Oberhausen, Michael, ed., Vernunftkritik und Aufklärung: Studien zur Philosophie Kants und seines Jahrhunderts, 93113. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Di Giovanni, George 2005. Freedom and Religion in Kant and His Immediate Successors. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyck, Corey W. 2019. Early Modern German Philosophy (1690–1750). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen. 2002. “The Inner Virtue of Freedom.” In Timmons, Mark, ed., Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretive Essays, 289315. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fabbianelli, Faustino. 2000. “Die Theorie der Willensfreiheit in den ‘Briefen über die Kantische Philosophie’ (1790–92) von Karl Leonhard Reinhold.” Philosophisches Jahrbuch 107, 428442.Google Scholar
Fabbianelli, Faustino, ed., transl., and annot. 2004. Karl Leonhard Reinhold: Beiträge zur Berichtigung bisheriger Mißverständnisse der Philosophen, Zweiter Band, die Fundamente des Wissens, der Metaphysik, Moral, moralischen Religion und Geschmackslehre betreffend. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Falduto, Antonino. 2016. “Freedom and Obligation: The Moral Debate between Kant and Hegel (1781–1807).” In Orden Jiménez, Rafael V et al., eds., Kant’s Shorter Writings: Critical Paths Outside the Critiques, 171179. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Falduto, Antonino 2018. “Freiheit zwischen Autonomie und Notwendigkeit: J. A. H. Ulrich.” In Waibel, Violetta L., Ruffing, Margit, and Wagner, David, eds., Natur und Freiheit: Akten des XII. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, vol. v, 33953402. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonnesu, Luca. 2006. “The Problem of Theodicy.” In Haakonssen, Knud, ed., The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy, vol. ii, 749778. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Forster, Michael N. 2018. “Free Will in Antiquity and in Kant.” In Krijnen, Christian, ed., Metaphysics of Freedom? Kant’s Concept of Cosmological Freedom in Historical and Systematic Perspective, 1026. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Fugate, Courtney F. 2012. “On a Supposed Solution to the Reinhold/Sidgwick Problem in Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals.” European Journal of Philosophy 23(3), 349373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulgate, Courtney F., and Hymers, John, eds. and trans. 2020. Baumgarten’s Elements of First Practical Philosophy: A Critical Translation with Kant’s Reflections on Moral Philosophy. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Sean. 2005. “Leibniz against Molinism: Freedom, Indifference, and the Nature of the Will.” In Rutherford, Donald and Cover, J. A., eds., Leibniz: Nature and Freedom, 217233. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grunert, Frank, and Hahmann, Andree, eds. 2021. Christian August Crusius (1715–1775). Philosophy between Reason and Revelation. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 2017. The Virtues of Freedom: Selected Essays on Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul 2018. “The Struggle for Freedom: Freedom of Will in Kant and Reinhold.” In Watkins, Erik, ed., Kant on Persons and Agency, 120–37. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, James A. 2005. Of Liberty and Necessity: The Free Will Debate in Eighteenth-Century British Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, Dieter. 1994. “The Concept of Moral Insight and Kant’s Doctrine of the Fact of Reason.” Translated by Manfred Kuehn. In Velkley, Richard L., ed., The Unity of Reason: Essays on Kant’s Philosophy, 5587. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter 2007. Denken und Selbstsein. Vorlesungen über Subjektivität. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias. 2010. “Intellectualism and Voluntarism.” In Pasnau, Robert, ed., The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy, vol. i, 414427. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias 2020. Free Will and the Rebel Angels in Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas Sören. 2018. “Kants theoretischer Freiheitsbegriff und die Tradition der ‚libertas spontaneitatis.” In Krijnen, Christian, ed., Metaphysics of Freedom? Kant’s Concept of Cosmological Freedom in Historical and Systematic Perspective, 4767. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
James, Susan. 1988. “The Passions in Metaphysics and the Theory of Action.” In Garber, Daniel and Ayers, Michael, eds., The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, 913949. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jorati, Julia. 2017. “Gottfried Leibniz (on Free Will).” In Timpe, Kevin, Griffith, Meghan, and Levy, Neil, eds., The Routledge Companion to Free Will, 293302. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kaehler, Klaus Erich. 2018. “The Freedom of the Monad and the Subject of Freedom.” In Krijnen, Christian, ed., Metaphysics of Freedom? Kant’s Concept of Cosmological Freedom in Historical and Systematic Perspective, 6876. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Kawamura, Katsutoshi. 1996. Spontaneität und Willkür: Der Freiheitsbegriff in Kants Antinomielehre und seine historischen Wurzeln. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Kaye, Sharon M. 2004. “Why the Liberty of Indifference is Worth Wanting: Buridan’s Ass, Friendship and Peter John Olivi.History of Philosophy Quarterly 21(1), 2142.Google Scholar
Kemp Smith, Norman. 2 1962. A Commentary to Kant’s “Critique of Pure Reason.” Revised and enlarged. New York: Humanities.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. 2010. “Moral Consciousness and the Fact of Reason.” In Reath, Andrews and Timmermann, Jens, eds., Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide, 5572. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemme, Heiner. 1996. Kants Philosophie des Subjekts: Systematische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen zum Verhältnis von Selbstbewußtsein und Selbsterkenntnis. Hamburg: Meiner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemme, Heiner 2008. “Moralisches Sollen, Autonomie und Achtung: Kants Konzeption der ‘libertas indifferentiae’ zwischen Wolff und Crusius.” In Rohden, Valerio et al., eds., Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants, Akten des X. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, vol. v, 215227. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemme, Heiner 2013. “Kants Erörterung der ‘libertas indifferentiae’ in der Metaphysik der Sitten und ihre philosophische Bedeutung.” In Rush, Fred and Stolzenberg, Jürgen, eds., Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus. Freiheit 9(2011), 2250. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Klemme, Heiner 2015. “Freiheit, Recht und Selbsterhaltung: Zur philosophischen Bedeutung von Kants Begriff der Verbindlichkeit.” In Rothhaar, Markus and Hähnel, Martin, eds., Normativität des Lebens – Normativität der Vernunft?, 95116. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemme, Heiner 2018a. “Das Problem der transzendentalen Freiheit und seine Lösung: Kant versus Wolff.” In Krijnen, Christian, ed., Metaphysics of Freedom? Kant’s Concept of Cosmological Freedom in Historical and Systematic Perspective, 7790. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Klemme, Heiner 2018b. “How is Moral Obligation Possible? Kant’s Principle of Autonomy in Historical Context.” In Bacin, Stefano and Sensen, Oliver, eds., The Emergence of Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Philosophy, 1028. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemme, Heiner 2019. “Kant’s Metaphysics of Freedom (1775–1782): Theoretical and Practical Perspectives.” In Fugate, Courtney D., ed., Kant’s Lectures on Metaphysics: A Critical Guide, 179193. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemme, Heiner, and Kuehn, Manfred, eds. 2016.The Bloomsbury Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century German Philosophers. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Kohl, Markus. 2014. “Transcendental and Practical Freedom in the Critique of Pure Reason.” Kant-Studien 105(3), 313335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohl, Markus 2020. “Spontaneity and Contingency: Kant’s Two Models of Rational Self-Determination.” In Kisner, Manja and Noller, Jörg, eds., The Concept of Will in Classical German Philosophy: Between Ethics, Politics, and Metaphysics, 2948. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosch, Michelle. 2006. Freedom and Reason in Kant, Schelling, and Kierkegaard. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred. 2001. Kant: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazzari, Alessandro. 2003a. “Das Eine, was der Menschheit Noth ist”: Einheit und Freiheit in der Philosophie Leonhard Reinholds (1789–1792). Stuttgart Bad-Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Lazzari, Alessandro 2003b. “K. L. Reinholds Behandlung der Willens- und Freiheitsthematik zwischen 1789 und 1792.” In Bondeli, Martin and Schrader, Wolfgang H., eds., Die Philosophie Karl Leonhard Reinholds, 191215. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Loncar, Samuel. 2013. “Converting the Kantian Self: Radical Evil, Agency, and Conversion in Kant’s Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason.” Kant-Studien 104(3), 346366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louden, Robert. 2000. Kant’s Impure Ethics: From Rational Beings to Human Beings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meier, Georg Friedrich. 1763. Alexander Gottlieb Baumgartens Leben, beschrieben von Georg Friedrich Meier. Halle: Hemmerde.Google Scholar
Mohr, Georg. 2018. “Autonomy and Moral Empiricism: Kant’s Criticism of Sentimentalist Moral Principles (1762–1785).” In Bacin, Stefano and Sensen, Oliver, eds., The Emergence of Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Philosophy, 6782. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noller, Jörg. 2 2016. Die Bestimmung des Willens: Zum Problem individueller Freiheit nach Kant. Freiburg and Munich: Karl Alber.Google Scholar
Noller, Jörg 2019. “‘Practical Reason is Not the Will’: Kant and Reinhold’s Dilemma.” European Journal of Philosophy 27(4), 852864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noller, Jörg 2020. “Higher Necessity: Schelling’s Volitional Compatibilism.” Idealistic Studies 50(1), 3349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, James. 1947. The Categorical Imperative: A Study in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. London: Hutchinson’s University Library.Google Scholar
Poser, Hans. 2005. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius.Google Scholar
Prauss, Gerold. 1983. Kant über Freiheit als Autonomie. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reath, Andrews. 1989. “Kant’s Theory of Moral Sensibility.” Kant-Studien 80(3), 284302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas. 1960. “Choice without Preference: A Study of the History of the Logic of the Problem of ‘Buridan’s Ass’.” Kant-Studien 51, 142175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivero, Gabriel. 2017. “Nötigung und Abhängigkeit. Zur Bestimmung des Begriffs der Verbindlichkeit bei Kant bis 1775.” In Dörflinger, Bernd, Hüning, Dieter, and Kruck, Günter, eds., Zum Verhältnis von Recht und Ethik in Kants praktischer Philosophie, 4570. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Donald. 2005. “Leibniz on Spontaneity.” In Rutherford, Donald and Cover, J. A., eds., Leibniz: Nature and Freedom, 156180. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schierbaum, Sonja. 2021. “Crusius on Moral Motivation.” In Grunert, Frank and Hahmann, Andree, eds., Christian August Crusius (1715–1775): Philosophy between Reason and Revelation. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schmucker, Josef. 1961. Die Ursprünge der Ethik Kants in seinen vorkritischen Schriften und Reflektionen. Meisenheim: Hain.Google Scholar
Schneewind, Jerome B. 2002. Moral Philosophy from Montaigne to Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönborn, Alexander von. 2004. “K. L. Reinholds letzte Erörterung des menschlichen Willens.” In Bondeli, Martin and Lazzari, Alessandro, eds., Philosophie ohne Beynamen: System, Freiheit, und Geschichte im Denken Karl Leonhard Reinholds, 290300. Basel: Schwabe.Google Scholar
Schönborn, Alexander von 2005. “Intelligibler Fatalismus: Reinhold mit und gegen Kant über die Freiheit.” Archivio di Filosofia (K. L. Reinhold. Alle soglie dell’idealismo) 73(1–3), 223232.Google Scholar
Schönecker, Dieter. 1999. Kant: Grundlegung III. Freiburg and Munich: Karl Alber.Google Scholar
Schönecker, Dieter 2005. Kants Begriff transzendentaler und praktischer Freiheit. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönecker, Dieter 2011. “Kants Grundlegung über den bösen Willen: Eine kommentarische Interpretation von GMS 457.25–458.5.” Studi Kantiani 24, 7391.Google Scholar
Schönecker, Dieter 2006. “How is a Categorical Imperative Possible? Kant’s Deduction of the Moral Law in Groundwork III.” In Horn, Christoph and Schönecker, Dieter, eds., Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: New Interpretations, 302324. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schönecker, Dieter 2013. “‘A Free Will and a Will under Moral Laws are the Same’: Kant’s Concept of Autonomy and His Thesis of Analyticity in Groundwork III.” In Sensen, Oliver, ed., Kant on Moral Autonomy, 225245. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schwaiger, Clemens. 2009. “The Theory of Obligation in Wolff, Baumgarten, and the Early Kant.” In Ameriks, Karl and Höffe, Otfried, eds., Kant’s Moral and Legal Philosophy, 5874. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwaiger, Clemens 2011. Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten – ein intellektuelles Porträt. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt. Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Schwaiger, Clemens 2018. “Baumgarten’s Theory of Freedom: A Contribution to the Wolff–Lange Controversy.” In Fugate, Courtney and Hymers, John, eds., Baumgarten and Kant on Metaphysics, 4260. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Ralph C. 1978. Kant. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wallwitz, Georg. 1998. Die Interpretation und Ausformung von Kants Philosophie durch Carl Christian Erhard Schmid (1762–1812). Aachen: Shaker.Google Scholar
Walschots, Michael. 2021. “Crusius on Freedom of the Will.” In Grunert, Frank and Hahmann, Andree, eds., Christian August Crusius (1715–1775): Philosophy between Reason and Revelation. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Walschots, Michael Forthcoming. Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: Background Source Materials Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walsh, John. 2020. “The Fact of Freedom: Reinhold’s Theory of Free Will Reconsidered.” In Kisner, Manja and Noller, Jörg, eds., The Concept of Will in Classical German Philosophy: Between Ethics, Politics, and Metaphysics, 89104. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, John 2021. “Reinhold’s Theory of Free Will in Relation to Kant’s Religion.” In Bondeli, Martin and Westerkamp, Dirk, eds., Vorstellen, Denken, Sprache: Reinholds Philosophie im Kontext des Deutschen Idealismus. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ware, Owen. 2014. “Rethinking Kant’s Fact of Reason.Philosopher’s Imprint 14(32), 121.Google Scholar
Wayne, Martin. 2018. “Fichte’s Creuzer Review and the Transformation of the Free Will Problem.European Journal of Philosophy 26, 717729.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Stephan. 2018. “Kant on ‘Practical Freedom’ and its Transcendental Possibility.” In Krijnen, Christian, ed., Metaphysics of Freedom? Kant’s Concept of Cosmological Freedom in Historical and Systematic Perspective, 91122. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Zöller, Günter. 2005. “Von Reinhold zu Kant: Zur Grundlegung der Moralphilosophiezwischen Vernunft und Willkür.” Archivio di Filosofia (K. L. Reinhold. Alle soglie dell’idealismo) 73(1–3), 7391.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited and translated by Jörg Noller, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munchen, John Walsh, Martin Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Germany
  • Book: Kant's Early Critics on Freedom of the Will
  • Online publication: 24 March 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108687720.024
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited and translated by Jörg Noller, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munchen, John Walsh, Martin Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Germany
  • Book: Kant's Early Critics on Freedom of the Will
  • Online publication: 24 March 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108687720.024
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited and translated by Jörg Noller, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munchen, John Walsh, Martin Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Germany
  • Book: Kant's Early Critics on Freedom of the Will
  • Online publication: 24 March 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108687720.024
Available formats
×