Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-66nw2 Total loading time: 0.524 Render date: 2021-12-01T17:02:09.708Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2019

Henry E. Allison
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Kant's Conception of Freedom
A Developmental and Critical Analysis
, pp. 504 - 514
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberg, Jeremiah, “Metaphysics as Kant’s coquette: Rousseau’s influence on Dreams of a Spirit-Seer,” Kantian Review, 20 (2015), 347–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberg, Jeremiah, “What dreams may come: Kant’s Träume eines Geistersehers elucidated by the dreams of a coquette,” Kant-Studien, 106 (2015) 169200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, H. G. (Ed.), The Leibniz–Clarke Correspondence, Together with Extracts from Newton’s Principia and Opticks (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1956).Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E., “Comments on Guyer,” Inquiry, 50 (2007), 480–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E., Essays on Kant (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E., “The concept of freedom in Kant’s ‘semi-critical’ ethics,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 68 (1986), 96115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E., Idealism and Freedom: Essays on Kant’s Theoretical and Practical Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E., “Kant’s critique of Berkeley,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 11 (1973), 4363.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E., Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E., Kant’s Theory of Freedom (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E., Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E., Kant’s Transcendental Deduction: An Analytical-Historical Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E., Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E., Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. Revised and enlarged edn. (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E., “Practical and transcendental freedom in the Critique of Pure Reason,” Kant-Studien, 73 (1982), 271–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E., “From Transcendental Realism to Transcendental Idealism: The nature and significance of Kant’s Transcendental Turn,” in Gardner, Sebastian and Grist, Matthew (Eds.), The Transcendental Turn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 2034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E. and Heath, Peter (Eds.), Theoretical Philosophy after 1781, translated by Allison, Henry E., Heath, Peter, Hatfield, Gary and Friedman, Michael, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl, Interpreting Kant’s Critiques (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl, Kant’s Theory of Mind: An Analysis of the Paralogisms of Pure Reason (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl, “Kant’s Transcendental Deduction as a regressive argument,” Kant-Studien, 69 (1978), 273–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl, “Vindicating autonomy: Kant, Sartre, and O’Neill,” in Sensen, Oliver (Ed.), Kant on Moral Autonomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 5370.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl and Steve, Naragon (Eds.), Kant’s Lectures on Metaphysics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Anderson-Gold, Sharon, “Kant’s rejection of devilishness: The limits of human volition,” Idealistic Studies, 14 (1984), 3548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aune, Bruce, Kant’s Theory of Morals (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander, Metaphysics: A Critical Translation with Kant’s Elucidations, Selected Notes, and Related Materials, edited and translated by Fugate, Courtney D. and Hymers, John (London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2014).Google Scholar
Baxley, Anne Margaret, “Autocracy and autonomy,” Kant-Studien, 94 (2003), 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxley, Anne Margaret, Kant’s Theory of Virtue: The Value of Autocracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Lewis White, Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1960).Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis White, Early German Philosophy: Kant and His Predecessors (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis White, “Five concepts of freedom in Kant,” in Srzednick, J. T. J. (Ed.), Philosophical Analysis and Reconstruction: A Festschrift to Stephan Körner (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1987), pp. 3551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan, Kant’s Dialectic (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Bittner, Rüdiger, What Reason Demands, translated by Talbot, Theodore (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Bojanowski, Jochen, “Kant on the justification of moral principles,” Kant-Studien, 108 (2017), 5588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bojanowski, Jochen, Kant’s Theorie der Freiheit: Rekonstruktion und Rehabilitierung (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Reinhard, “Der Zirkel im dritten Abschnitt von Kants Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten,” in Oberer, Hariolf and Seel, Gerhard (Eds.), Kant: Analysen–Probleme–Kritik (Wurtburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 1988), pp. 169–91.Google Scholar
Brandt, Reinhard, “Kant as rebel against the social order,” in Shell, Susan Meld and Velkley, Richard (Eds.), Kant’s Observations and Remarks: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 185–97.Google Scholar
Broad, C. D., “Some reflections on moral sense theories in ethics,” reprinted in Sellars, W. S. and Hospers, J. (Eds.), Readings in Ethical Theory (New York, NY: Appleton-Century Crofts, 1952), pp. 363–92.Google Scholar
Carnois, Bernard, The Coherence of Kant’s Doctrine of Freedom, translated by Booth, David (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst, “Kant and Rousseau,” in Rousseau, Kant, Goethe, translated by Gutmann, James, Kristeller, Paul Oskar, and Randall, John Hermann Jr. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1945), pp. 160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chignell, Andrew, “Kant, modality, and the most real being,” Archiv für die Geschichte der Philosophie, 91 (2009), 157–91.Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew, “Kant, real possibility, and the threat of Spinoza,” Mind, 121 (2012), 635–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Ted, “Why beauty is the symbol of morality,” in Cohen, Ted and Guyer, Paul (Eds.), Essays in Kant’s Aesthetics (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1982), pp. 221–36.Google Scholar
Crawford, Donald W., Kant’s Aesthetic Theory (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Crusius, Christian August, Anweisung vernünftig zu leben (1744), reprinted in Christian August Crusius: Die philosphischen Hauptwerke, Vol. 3, edited by Tonelli, Giorgio (Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1969).Google Scholar
Crusius, Christian August, Entwurf der nothwendigen Vernunft=Wahrheiten, wiefern sie den zufälligen entgegen gestetzt (1745), reprinted in Christian August Crusius: Die philosphischen Hauptwerke, Vol. 2, edited by Tonelli, Giorgio (Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1964).Google Scholar
Crusius, Christian August, Weg zur Gewissheit und Zuverlässigkeit der mensclichen Erknntniss (1747), reprinted in Christian August Crusius: Die philosphischen Hauptwerke, Vol. 3, edited by Tonelli, Giorgio (Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1965).Google Scholar
Delbois, Victor, La Philosophie pratique de Kant, 3rd edn. (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1969).Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C., Elbow Room: The Varieties of Free Will Worth Wanting (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Dent, Nicholas, Rousseau (London: Routledge, 2005).Google Scholar
Düsing, Klaus, Die Teleologie in Kants Weltbegriff, Kantstudien Ergänzungshefte, Vol. 96 (Bonn: H. Bouvier und Co. Verlag, 1968).Google Scholar
Dyck, Corey W.Chimerical ethics and flattering moralists: Baumgarten’s influence on Kant’s moral theory in the Observations and Remarks,” in Shell, Susan Meld and Velkley, Richard (Eds.), Kant’s Observations and Remarks: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 3856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyck, Corey W. Kant & Rational Psychology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdmann, Benno (Ed.), Reflexionen Kants zur Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Leipzig: Fues’s Verlag [R. Reisland], 1882).Google Scholar
Esteves, Julio, “The alleged incompatibility between the concepts of practical freedom in the Dialectic and in the Canon of the Critique of Pure Reason,” Kant-Studien, 105 (2014), 336–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, A. C., A Short Commentary on Kant’s “Critique of Pure Reason,” 2nd edn. (London: Methuen, 1950).Google Scholar
Firestone, Chris L. and Jacobs, Nathan, In Defense of Kant’s Religion (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Frankena, William, “Hutcheson’s moral sense theory,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 16 (1955), 356–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, Paul W., All or Nothing: Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Skepticism in German Idealism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Frierson, Patrick, “Two concepts of universality in Kant’s moral theory,” in Shell, Susan Meld and Velkley, Richard (Eds.), Kant’s Observations and Remarks: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 5776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frierson, Patrick and Guyer, Paul (Eds.), Kant: Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime and Other Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guéroult, Martial, “Canon de la raison pure et critique de la raison pratique,” Revue internationale de la philosophie, 8 (1954), 331–57.Google Scholar
Gregor, Mary, J., Laws of Freedom: A Study of Kant’s Method of Applying the Categorical Imperative in the Metaphysik der Sitten (Oxford: Blackwell, 1963).Google Scholar
Gregor, Mary, J. (Ed.), Practical Philosophy, translated by Gregor, Mary J., The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Grier, Michelle, Kant’s Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul, “Freedom as the foundation of morality: Kant’s early efforts,” in Shell, Susan Meld and Velkley, Richard (Eds.), Kant’s Observations and Remarks: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 7798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul, Kant and the Experience of Freedom: Essays on Aesthetics and Morality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul, Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul, “Naturalistic and transcendental moments in Kant’s moral philosophy,” Inquiry, 50 (2007), 444–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul, “Pleasure and society in Kant’s theory of taste,” in Cohen, Ted and Guyer, Paul (Eds.), Essays in Kant’s Aesthetics (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1982), pp 2154.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (Ed.), Critique of the Power of Judgment, translated by Matthews, Eric, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul Notes and Fragments, translated by Guyer, Paul, Bowman, Curtis and Rauscher, Frederick, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Heath, Peter and Schneewind, J. B. (Eds.), Lectures on Ethics, translated by Heath, Peter, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., Lectures on the History of Philosophy, Vol. 3, translated by Haldane, E. S. and Simson, Frances H. (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., Phenomenology of Spirit, translated by Miller, A. V. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Heimsoeth, Heinz, “Freiheit und Charakter nach den Kant-Reflexionen Nr. 5611 bis 5620,” in Arnold, Wilhelm and Zeltner, Hermann (Eds.), Tradition und Kritik, Festschrift für Rudolf Zocher zum 80, Geburtstag (Stuttgart: Friedrich Frommann, 1967), pp. 123–44.Google Scholar
Heimsoeth, Heinz, Transzendental Dialektik: ein Kommentar zu Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft, 4 vols. (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1968).Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter, “Concerning Kant’s earliest ethics: An attempt at a reconstruction,” in Shell, Susan Meld and Velkley, Richard (Eds.), Kant’s Observations and Remarks: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 1337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, Dieter, “The concept of moral insight and Kant’s doctrine of the fact of reason,” in Velkley, Richard (Ed.), The Unity of Reason: Essays on Kant’s Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter, “Das Prinzip der Kantischen Ethik,” Philosophische Rundschau, 2 (1954–5), 2038.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter, “The deduction of the moral law: The reasons for the obscurity of the final section of Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals,” in Guyer, Paul (Ed.), Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: Critical Essays (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 1998).Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter, “Hutcheson und Kant,” Kant-Studien, 49 (1957), 4969.Google Scholar
Home, Henry (Lord Kames), “Essays on the Principles of Morals and Natural Religion (selections),” in Selby-Bigge, L. A. (Ed.), British Moralists, Vol. 2 (Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1964), pp. 300–25.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis, An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections, with Illustrations on the Moral Sense, edited with an introduction by Aaron Garrett (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, Inc., 2002).Google Scholar
Insole, Christopher, Kant and the Creation of Freedom: A Theological Problem (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, Terence, “Morality and personality: Kant and Green,” in Wood, Allen W. (Ed.), Self and Nature in Kant’s Philosophy (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984), pp. 3156.Google Scholar
Josifovic, Sasa, “Das ‘Kanon-Problem’ in Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft,” Kant-Studien, 106 (2015), 487506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp Smith, Norman, A Commentary to Kant’s “Critique of Pure Reason,” 2nd edn. revised and enlarged (New York, NY: Humanities Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline, “Moral consciousness and the fact of reason,” in Reath, Andrews and Timmermann, Jens (Eds.), Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Kohl, Markus, “Transcendental and practical freedom in the Critique of Pure Reason,” Kant-Studien, 105 (2014), 313–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M., “Kant’s analysis of obligation: The argument of Foundations I,” The Monist, 72 (1989), 311–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred, “Collins: Kant’s proto-critical position,” in Denis, Lara and Sensen, Oliver (Eds.), Kant’s Lectures on Ethics: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 5167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred, Kant: A Biography (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Mettrie, Julien Offray de, Man a Machine, French–English edn. (La Salle, IL: Open Court Publishing Company, 1953).Google Scholar
Laywine, Alison, Kant’s Early Metaphysics and the Origins of the Critical Philosophy (Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing, 1993).Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., New Essays on Human Understanding, edited and translated by Remnant, Peter and Bennett, Jonathan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Louden, Robert B. and Zöller, Günter (Eds.), Anthropology, History, and Education, translated by Louden, Robert B. and Zöller, Günter, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur O., The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea (New York, NY: Harper, 1960).Google Scholar
McCarthy, Michael H., “Kant’s application of the analytic/synthetic distinction to imperatives,” Dialogue, 18 (1979), 373–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Georg Friedric, Philosophische Sittenlehre, 5 vols. (Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung, 2007).Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y., “Omnis determinatio est negatio,” in Melamed, Yitzhak Y. and Förster, Eckart (Eds.), Spinoza and German Idealism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 175–96.Google Scholar
Menzer, Paul, “Der Entwicklungsgang der Kantischen Ethik in den Jahren 1760–1785,” Erster Abschnitt, Kant-Studien, 2 (1898), 290322.Google Scholar
Menzer, Paul, “Der Entwicklungsgang der Kantischen Ethik in den Jahren 1760–1785,” Zweiter Abschnitt, Kant-Studien, 3 (1899), 41104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michalson, Gordon E. Jr., Fallen Freedom: Kant on Radical Evil and Moral Regeneration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munzel, Felicitas, “The beautiful is the symbol of the morally-good: Kant’s philosophical basis of proof for the idea of the morally-good,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 33 (1995), 301–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuhouser, Frederick, Rousseau’s Theodicy of Self-Love, Evil, Rationality, and the Drive for Recognition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberst, Michael, “Two worlds and two aspects: On Kant’s distinction between things in themselves and appearances,” Kantian Review, 20 (2015), 5375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortwein, Birger, Kants problematische Freiheitslehre (Bonn: Bouvier, 1983).Google Scholar
Papish, Laura, Kant on Evil, Self-Deception, and Moral Reform (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paton, H. J., The Categorical Imperative: A Study in Kant’s Moral Philosophy, 3rd edn. (London: Hutchinson & Co, 1958).Google Scholar
Potter, Nelson, “The Argument of Kant’s Groundwork, Chapter 1,” in Guyer, Paul (Ed.), Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: Critical Essays (Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield, 1998), pp. 2950.Google Scholar
Prauss, Gerold, Kant über Freiheit als Autonomie (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proops, Ian, “Kant’s legal metaphor and the nature of a deduction,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 41 (2003), 209–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quarfood, Marcel, “The circle and the two standpoints,” in Horn, Christoph and Schönecker, Dieter (Eds.), Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2006), pp. 285300.Google Scholar
Reath, Andrews, “Hedonism, heteronomy and Kant’s principle of happiness,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 70 (1989), 4272.Google Scholar
Reath, Andrews, “Kant’s theory of moral sensibility: Respect for the moral law and the influence of inclination,” Kant-Studien, 80 (1989), 284302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhold, Karl Leonhard, Einige Bemerkungen über die in der Einleitung zu den “Metaphysischen Anfangsgründen der Rechtslehre” von I Kant aufgestellten Begriffe von der Freiheit des Willens, in Bittner, Rüdiger and Cramer, Konrad (Eds.), Materialien zu Kants Kritik der praktischen Vernunft (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1975), pp. 310–24.Google Scholar
Rischmüller, Marie (Ed.), Immanuel Kant: Bemerkungen in den “Beobachtungen über das Gefühl des Schönen und Erhabenen” (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1991).Google Scholar
Röttges, Heinz, “Kants Auflösung der Freiheitsantinomie,” Kant-Studien, 65 (1974), 3349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings, edited by Gourevitch, Victor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997a).Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Emile, translated with introduction and notes by Bloom, Allan (New York, NY: Basic Books, 1979).Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Emile or On Education, translated and edited by Kelly, Christopher and Bloom, Allan (Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 2010).Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Julie or the New Heloise, translated and annotated by Stewart, Philip and Vache, Jean, The Collected Writings of Rousseau, Vol. 6 (Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1997).Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, On the Social Contract with Geneva Manuscript and Political Economy, edited by Masters, Roger D., translated by Masters, Judith R. (New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert, The Concept of Mind (New York, NY: Barns & Noble, 1949).Google Scholar
Schiller, Fredrich. Über Anmut und Würde, Schillers Werke, Bd. 11 (Stuttgart: J. G. Cotta’schen, 1867), pp. 238–96.Google Scholar
Schlipp, Paul Arthur, Kant’s Pre-critical Ethics, 2nd edn. (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1960).Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B., The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Schmucker, Josef, Die Ursprünge der Ethik Kants (Meisenheim am Glan: Verlag Anton Hain, 1961).Google Scholar
Schönecker, Dieter, Kant: Grundlegung III Die Deduktion des kategorischen Imperativs (Freiburg/Munich: Verlag Karl Alber, 1999).Google Scholar
Schönecker, Dieter, Kants Begriff transzendentaler und praktischer Freiheit: Eine entwicklungsgeschichtliche Studie, Kantstudien Ergänzungshefte 149 (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönfeld, Martin, The Philosophy of the Young Kant: The Precritical Project (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur, On the Basis of Morality, translated by Payne, E. F. (Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill Co., 1965).Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur, The World as Will and Representation, Vol. 1, translated by Payne, E. F. (Indian Hills, CO: Falcon Wing’s Press, 1958).Google Scholar
Schulz, Eberhard Günter, Rehbergs Opposition gegen Kants Ethik, Eine Untersuchung ihrer Grundlegung, ihrer Berücksichtigung durch Kant und ihrer Wirkungen auf Reinhold, Schiller, Fichte (Cologne: Böhlau Verlag, 1975).Google Scholar
Schulz, Johann, “Review of Kant’s Inaugural Dissertation,” Appendix B in Exposition of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, translated by Morrison, James C. (Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Schwaiger, Clemens, “Die Anfänge des Projekts einer Metaphysik der Sitten zu den wolffianischen Wurzeln einer kantischen Schlüsselidee,” in Volker, Gerhardt, Horstmann, Rolf-Peter, and Schumacher, Ralph (Eds.), Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung, Akten des IX. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, Vol. 2 (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2001), pp. 52–8.Google Scholar
Schwaiger, Clemens, Kategorische und andere Imperative: Zur Entwicklung von Kants praktischer Philosophie bis 1785 (Stuttgart: Friedrich Frommann Verlag, 1999).Google Scholar
Schwaiger, Clemens, “The Theory of Obligation in Wolff, Baumgarten, and the early Kant,” in Ameriks, Karl and Höffe, Otfried (Eds.), Kant’s Moral and Legal Philosophy, translated by Walker, Nicholas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 5873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweitzer, Albert, Die Religionsphilosophie Kants von der Kritik der reinen Vernunft bis zur Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der blossen Vernunft (Freiburg: J. C. D. Mohr, 1899).Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfred, Essays in Philosophy and Its History (Dordrecht/Boston: D. Reidel, 1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, William R., “Filled with wonder: Kant’s cosmological essay, the Universal Natural History and Theory of the Heavens,” in Butts, Robert E. (Ed.), Kant’s Philosophy of Physical Science (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1986), pp. 95124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shell, Susan Meld, The Embodiment of Reason: Kant on Spirit, Generation and Community (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry, The Methods of Ethics (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 2005).Google Scholar
Silber, John, “The ethical significance of Kant’s religion,” introduction to the English translation of Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone (New York, NY: Harper & Row, 1960).Google Scholar
Stang, Nicholas. “Kant’s possibility proof,” History of Philosophy Quarterly, 27 (2010), 275–99.Google Scholar
Stark, Werner (Ed.), Immanuel Kant: Vorlesung zur Moral Philosophie (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2004).Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F., The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason (London: Methuen, 1966).Google Scholar
Thorndike, Oliver, “Ethica deceptrix: The significance of Baumgarten’s notion of a chimerical ethics for the development of Kant’s moral philosophy,” in Rohden, Valerio, Terra, Ricardo R., de Almeida, Guido A., and Ruffing, Margit (Eds.), Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants, Akten des X. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, Vol. 3 (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2008), pp. 451–61.Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens, “Reversal or retreat? Kant’s deductions of freedom and morality,” in Reath, Andrews and Timmermann, Jens (Eds.), Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp. 7389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonelli, Giorgio, “Von den verschiedenen Bedeutungen des Wortes Zweckmässigkeit in der Kritik der Urteilskraft,” Kant-Studien, 49 (1957–8), 154–66.Google Scholar
Vaihinger, Hans, The Philosophy of As If, trans. Ogden, C. K., 2nd edn. (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., 1935).Google Scholar
Velkley, Richard L., Freedom and the End of Reason (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walford, David and Meerbote, Ralf (Eds.), Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770, translated by Walford, David in collaboration with Meerbote, Ralf, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Ware, Owen, “Rethinking Kant’s fact of reason,” Philosopher’s Imprint, 14 (2014), 121.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric (Ed.), Natural Science, translated by Beck, Lewis White, Edwards, Jeffrey B., Reinhardt, Olaf, Schönfeld, Martin and Watkins, Eric, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Willaschek, Marcus, Praktische Vernunft: Handlungstheorie und Moralbegründung bei Kant (Stuttgart: J. B. Metzerg, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, translated by Pears, D. F. and McGuinness, B. F. (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1961).Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian, Vernünftige Gedanken von der Kräften des mensclichen Verstandes und ihrem richtigen Gebrauche in Erkenntnis der Wahrheit, edited by Werner Arndt, von Hans (Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1965).Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian, Vernünfftige Gedancken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, Auch allen Dingen überhaupt, Den Leibhabern der Wahrheit mitgetheilet (1751) (Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Research Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Wolff, Michael, “Warum das Faktum der Vernunft ein Faktum ist, Auflösung einiger Verständnissschwierigkeiten I Kants Grundlegung der Moral,” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 57 (2009), 511–49.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W., Hegel’s Ethical Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen W., Kantian Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W., “Kant’s compatibilism,” in Self and Nature in Kant’s Philosophy (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984), 73101.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W., Kant’s Ethical Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen W., “Kant’s fourth proposition: The unsociable sociability of human nature,” in Rorty, Amélie Oksenberg and Schmidt, James (Eds.), Kant’s Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 112–28.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W., Kant’s Moral Religion (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. and di Giovanni, George (Eds.), Religion and Rational Theology, translated by Wood, Allen W. and di Giovanni, George, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Young, J. Michael (Ed.), Lectures on Logic, translated by Young, J. Michael, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Zammito, John, H., The Genesis of Kant’s Critique of Judgment (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Henry E. Allison, University of California, San Diego
  • Book: Kant's Conception of Freedom
  • Online publication: 19 December 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316535196.012
Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Henry E. Allison, University of California, San Diego
  • Book: Kant's Conception of Freedom
  • Online publication: 19 December 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316535196.012
Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Henry E. Allison, University of California, San Diego
  • Book: Kant's Conception of Freedom
  • Online publication: 19 December 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316535196.012
Available formats
×