Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T01:51:59.247Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2018

Melissa Merritt
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, Sydney
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelung, Johann Christoph. 1811. Grammatisch-kritisches Wörterbuch der hochdeutschen Mundart. http://lexika.digitale-sammlungen.de/adelung/online/angebot (accessed 24 March 2015).Google Scholar
Allison, Henry. 2001. Kant's Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. 2006. ‘A Common-Sense Kant?’ In Kant and the Historical Turn: Philosophy as Critical Interpretation, 108–33. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Annas, Julia. 1995. ‘Virtue as a Skill.’ International Journal of Philosophical Studies 3 (2): 227–43.Google Scholar
Annas, Julia. 2001. ‘The Structure of Virtue.’ In Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives from Ethics and Epistemology, edited by DePaul, Michael and Zagzebski, Linda, 1533. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Annas, Julia. 2011. Intelligent Virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1958. ‘Modern Moral Philosophy.’ Philosophy 33 (124): 119.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, edited by Barnes, Jonathan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bacin, Stefano. 2010. ‘The Doctrine of Method of Pure Practical Reason.’ In Kant's Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide, edited by Reath, Andrew and Timmerman, Jens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baehr, Jason. 2011. The Inquiring Mind: On Intellectual Virtues and Virtue Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Battaly, Heather. 2014. ‘Intellectual Virtues.’ In The Handbook of Virtue Ethics, edited by van Hooft, Stan, 177–87. Durham: Acumen.Google Scholar
Baxley, Anne Margaret. 2010. Kant's Theory of Virtue: The Value of Autocracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Betzler, Monika, ed. 2008. Kant's Ethics of Virtue. Berlin and New York, NY: DeGruyter.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Paul. 2000. ‘Virtue Epistemology and the Epistemology of Virtue.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (1): 2343.Google Scholar
Boswell, Terry. 1988. ‘On the Textual Authenticity of Kant's Logic.’ History and Philosophy of Logic 9 (2): 193203.Google Scholar
Brandt, Reinhard. 1999. Kritischer Kommentar zu Kants Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht (1798). Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Brandt, Reinhard. 2003. ‘The Vocation of the Human Being.’ In Essays on Kant's Anthropology, edited by Jacobs, Brian and Kain, Patrick, 85104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brewer, Talbot. 2000. The Bounds of Choice: Unchosen Virtues, Unchosen Commitments. New York, NY and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brewer, Talbot. 2002. ‘Maxims and Virtues.’ Philosophical Review 111 (4): 539–72.Google Scholar
Brewer, Talbot. 2011. ‘Two Pictures of Practical Thinking.’ In Perfecting Virtue: New Essays on Kantian Ethics and Virtue Ethics, edited by Jost, Lawrence and Wuerth, Julian, 116–46. Cambridge and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Broadie, Alexander and Pybus, Elizabeth M.. 1982. ‘Kant and Weakness of Will.’ Kant-Studien 73 (4): 406–12.Google Scholar
Cambiano, Giuseppe. 2012. ‘The Desire to Know: Metaphysics A1.’ In Aristotle's Metaphysics Alpha: Symposium Aristotelicum, edited by Steel, Carlos and Primavesi, Oliver, 147. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carlisle, Clare. 2014. On Habit. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew. 2007. ‘Belief in Kant.’ The Philosophical Review 116 (3): 323–60.Google Scholar
Ciafardone, Raffael, ed. 1990. Die Philosophie der deutschen Aufklärung: Texte und Darstelling. German edition prepared by Hinske, Nobert and Specht, Reiner. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
Clarke, Bridget. 2010. ‘Virtue and Disagreement.’ Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (3): 273–91.Google Scholar
Cohen, Alix, ed. 2014a. Kant on Emotion and Value. Basingstoke and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cohen, Alix. 2014b. ‘Kant on the Ethics of Belief.’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 114 (3): 317–34.Google Scholar
Collins, Arthur W. 1999. Possible Experience: Understanding Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Berkeley, CA, Los Angeles, CA and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, John. 1998. ‘The Unity of Virtue.’ Social Philosophy and Policy 15 (1): 233–74.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen. 1977. ‘Two Kinds of Respect.’ Ethics 88 (1): 3649.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen. 2008. ‘Kant on Respect, Dignity, and the Duty of Respect.’ In Kant's Ethics of Virtue, edited by Betzler, Monika, 175200. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
de Boer, Karin. 2011. ‘Transformations of Transcendental Philosophy: Wolff, Kant, and Hegel.’ Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 32 (1–2): 5079.Google Scholar
Deligiorgi, Katerina. 2002. ‘Universalisability, Publicity, and Communication: Kant's Conception of Reason.’ European Journal of Philosophy 10(2): 143–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, Lara. 2000. ‘Kant's Cold Sage and the Sublimity of Apathy.’ Kantian Review 4 (1): 4873.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. 1985. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Translated by Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert and Murdoch, Dugald. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Driver, Julia. 2003. ‘The Conflation of Moral and Epistemic Virtue.’ Metaphilosophy 34 (30): 367–83.Google Scholar
Dyck, Corey W. 2016. ‘Spontaneity before the Critical Turn: Crusius, Tetens, and the Pre-Critical Kant on the Spontaneity of the Mind.’ Journal of the History of Philosophy 54 (4): 625–48.Google Scholar
Elizondo, E. Sonny. 2013. ‘Reason in Its Practical Application.’ Philosophers’ Imprint 13 (21): 117.Google Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen. 2009. The Form of Practical Knowledge: A Study of the Categorical Imperative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fridland, Ellen. 2014. ‘They've Lost Control: Reflections on Skill.’ Synthese 191 (12): 2729–50.Google Scholar
Frierson, Patrick. 2003. Freedom and Anthropology in Kant's Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frierson, Patrick. 2014. Kant's Empirical Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Formosa, Paul. 2011. ‘A Life without Affects and Passions: Kant on the Duty of Apathy.’ Parrhesia 13: 96111.Google Scholar
Gardner, Sebastian. 2006. ‘The Primacy of Practical Reason.’ In A Companion to Kant, edited by Bird, Graham, 259–74. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Geiger, Ido. 2015. ‘How Do We Acquire Moral Knowledge? Is Knowing Our Duty Ever Passive? – Two Questions for Martin Sticker.’ British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (5): 990–7.Google Scholar
Gelfert, Axel. 2006. ‘Kant on Testimony.’ British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (4): 627–52.Google Scholar
Grenberg, Jeanine. 2005. Kant and the Ethics of Humility: A Story of Dependence, Corruption, and Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grenberg, Jeanine. 2013. Kant's Defence of Common Moral Experience: A Phenomenological Account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 2011. ‘Kantian Perfectionism.’ In Perfecting Virtue: New Essays on Kantian Ethics and Virtue Ethics, edited by Jost, Lawrence and Wuerth, Julian, 194214. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hare, John. 2011. ‘Kant, the Passions, and the Structure of Moral Motivation.’ Faith and Philosophy 28 (1): 5470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrower, Elizabeth. 2012 [1966]. The Watch Tower. Melbourne: Text Publishing Australia.Google Scholar
Harrower, Elizabeth. 2014. In Certain Circles. Melbourne: Text Publishing Australia.Google Scholar
Heidemann, Dietmar H. 2012. ‘The “I Think” Must Be Able to Accompany All My Representations: Unconscious Representations and Self-consciousness in Kant’. In Kant's Philosophy of the Unconscious, edited by Giordanetti, Piero, Pozzo, Riccardo, and Sgarbi, Marco, 3760. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Herman, Barbara. 1993. The Practice of Moral Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Herman, Barbara. 2007. Moral Literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas E. Jr. 2012. ‘Kant on Weakness of Will.’ In Virtue, Rules, and Justice: Kantian Aspirations, 107–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Iyengar, B. K. S. 1979. Light on Yoga, rev. ed. New York, NY: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Jost, Lawrence and Wuerth, Julian, eds. 2011. Perfecting Virtue: New Essays on Kantian Ethics and Virtue Ethics. Cambridge and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Pierre. 1998. Kant and the Demands of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kennett, Jeanette. 2015. ‘What is Required for Motivation by Principle?’ In Motivational Internalism, edited by Björnsson, Gunnar, Strandberg, Caj, Olinder, Ragnar Francén, Eriksson, John and Björklund, Fredrik, 108–29. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Patricia. 2003. ‘What is a Maxim?’ Philosophical Topics 31 (1–2): 215–43.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Patricia. 2011. Kant's Thinker. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Patricia. 2012. ‘Kant's Unconscious “Given”.’ In Kant's Philosophy of the Unconscious, edited by Giordanetti, Piero, Pozzo, Riccardo and Sgarbi, Marco, 536. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. 2007. ‘Kant's Second Thoughts about Race.’ Philosophical Quarterly 57 (229): 573–92.Google Scholar
Klemme, Heiner F. 2014. ‘Is the Categorical Imperative the Highest Principle of Both Pure Practical and Theoretical Reason?’ Kantian Review 19 (1): 119126.Google Scholar
Kohl, Markus. 2015. ‘Kant on Freedom of Empirical Thought.’ Journal of the History of Philosophy 53 (2): 301–26.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. 1996. The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. 2008. The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reason and Moral Psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. 2009. Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred. 1987. Scottish Common Sense in Germany, 1768–1800: A Contribution to the History of Critical Philosophy. Kingston, ON and Montreal, QB: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred. 2009. ‘Reason as a Species Characteristic.’ In Kant's Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim: A Critical Guide, edited by Rorty, Amélie O. and Schmidt, James, 6893. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Larmore, Charles. 2008. The Autonomy of Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G.W. 1981. New Essays on Human Understanding. Translated and edited by Remnant, Peter and Bennett, Jonathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G.W. 1989. Philosophical Essays. Translated and edited by Ariew, Roger and Garber, Daniel. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Liedtke, Max. 1966. ‘Der Begriff der Reflexion bei Kant.’ Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 48 (1–3): 207–16.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice. 1998. Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Wolfe, Charles T.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Louden, Robert B. 2011. Kant's Human Being: Essays on His Theory of Human Nature. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lu-Adler, Huaping. 2015. ‘Constructing a Demonstration of Logical Rules, or How to Use Kant's Logic Corpus.’ In Reading Kant's Lectures, edited by Clewis, Robert, 137–58. Berlin and New York, NY: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lu-Adler, Huaping. 2017. ‘Kant and the Normativity of Logic.’ European Journal of Philosophy 25 (2): 207–30.Google Scholar
Mahon, James Edwin. 2009. ‘The Truth about Kant on Lies.’ In The Philosophy of Deception, edited by Martin, Clancy, 201–22. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf. 2014. ‘Self-Cognition and Self-Assessment.’ In Kant's Lectures on Anthropology: A Critical Guide, edited by Cohen, Alix, 1837. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McAndrew, Mathew. 2014. ‘Healthy Understanding and Urtheilskraft: The Development of the Power of Judgment in Kant's Early Faculty Psychology.’ Kant-Studien 105 (3): 394405.Google Scholar
McDowell, John. 1979. ‘Virtue and Reason.’ The Monist 62 (3): 331350. Reprinted in McDowell (1998, 50–73).Google Scholar
McDowell, John. 1994. Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, John. 1998. Mind, Value, and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, John. 2009. Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Meier, Georg Friedrich. 1752. Auszug aus der Vernunftlehre. Halle: Gebauer.Google Scholar
Meier, Georg Friedrich. 2016 [1752]. Excerpt from the Doctrine of Reason. Translated by Bunch, Aaron in collaboration with Gelfert, Axel and Pozzo, Riccardo. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Mellin, G.S.A. 1799. Encyclopädisches Wörterbuch der Kritischen Philosophie, Vol. 2, Part 2. Jena and Leipzig: F. Frommann.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses. 1771. Philosophische Schriften. Zweiter Teil. Berlin: Christian Friedrich Voß.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses. 1997. Philosophical Writings. Translated by Dahlstrom, Daniel O.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Merritt, Melissa McBay. 2009. ‘Reflection, Enlightenment, and the Significance of Spontaneity in Kant.’ British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (5): 9811010.Google Scholar
Merritt, Melissa McBay. 2011a. ‘Kant's Argument for the Apperception Principle.’ European Journal of Philosophy 19 (1): 5984.Google Scholar
Merritt, Melissa McBay. 2011b. ‘Kant on Enlightened Moral Pedagogy.’ Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (3): 227–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, Melissa McBay. 2015. ‘Varieties of Reflection in Kant's Logic.’ British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (3): 478501.Google Scholar
Merritt, Melissa McBay. 2017a. ‘Practical Reason and Respect for Persons.’ Kantian Review 22: 5379.Google Scholar
Merritt, Melissa McBay. 2017b. ‘Respect, Love, and Individuals: Murdoch as a Guide to Kantian Ethics.’ European Journal of Philosophy. DOI: 10.1111/ejop.12280.Google Scholar
Merritt, Melissa McBay. 2017c. ‘Sublimity and Joy: Kant on the Aesthetic Constitution of Virtue.’ In The Palgrave Kant Handbook, edited by Altman, Matthew C., 447–67. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Merritt, Melissa McBay. Forthcoming. ‘Mendelssohn and Kant on Virtue as a Skill.’ In Routledge Handbook of Skill and Expertise, edited by Fridland, Ellen and Pavese, Carlotta. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Merritt, Melissa and Valaris, Markos. 2017. ‘Attention and Synthesis in Kant's Conception of Experience.’ Philosophical Quarterly 67 (268): 571–92.Google Scholar
Mikelsen, Kjartan Koch. 2010. ‘Testimony and Kant's Idea of Public Reason.’ Res Publica 16 (1): 2340.Google Scholar
Mikkelsen, Jon M., ed. and trans. 2013. Kant and the Concept of Race: Late Eighteenth Century Writings. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Mole, Christopher. 2011. Attention is Cognitive Unison: An Essay in Philosophical Psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mole, Christopher, Smithies, Declan and Wu, Wayne, eds. 2011. Attention: Philosophical and Psychological Essays. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Montero, Barbara. 2013. ‘A Dancer Reflects.’ In Mind, Reason, and Being-in-the-World: The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate, edited by Schear, Joseph K., 303–19. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Montmarquet, James. 1987. ‘Epistemic Virtue.’ Mind 96 (384): 482–97.Google Scholar
Montmarquet, James. 1993. Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Mudd, Sasha. 2016. ‘Rethinking the Priority of Practical Reason in Kant.’ European Journal of Philosophy 24 (1): 78102.Google Scholar
Munzel, G. Felicitas. 1999. Kant's Conception of Moral Character. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Iris. 1971. The Sovereignty of Good. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Naragon, Steve. 2006. ‘Kant in the Classroom: Materials to Aid the Study of Kant's Lectures.’ Available from www.manchester.edu/kant/ [accessed 7 December 2017].Google Scholar
O'Neill, Onora. 1989. Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant's Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Onora. 1996. Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Onora. 1998. ‘Kant's Virtues.’ In How Should One Live?, edited by Crisp, Roger, 7797. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pozzo, Riccardo. 2005. ‘Prejudices and Horizons: G.F. Meier's Vernunftlehre and Its Relation to Kant.’ Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (2): 185202.Google Scholar
Roberts, Robert C. and Wood, W. Jay. 2007. Intellectual Virtues: An Essay in Regulative Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roessler, Johannes. 2011. ‘Perceptual Attention and the Space of Reasons.’ In Attention: Philosophical and Psychological Essays, edited by Mole, Christopher, Smithies, Declan and Wu, Wayne, 274–91. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sandel, Adam Adatto. 2014. The Place of Prejudice: A Case for Reasoning Within the World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schear, Joseph K., ed. 2013. Mind, Reason, and Being-in-the-World: The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate. Abingdon and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schmidt, James, ed. 1996. What is Enlightenment?: Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth-Century Questions. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schneiders, Werner. 1983. Aufklärung und Vorurteilskritik: Studien zur Geschichte der Vorurteilstheorie. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: frommann-holzboog.Google Scholar
Sherman, Nancy. 1997. Making a Necessity of Virtue: Aristotle and Kant on Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smit, Houston. 1999. ‘The Role of Reflection in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason.’ Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80 (2): 203–23.Google Scholar
Sosa, Ernest. 1991. Knowledge and Perspective: Selected Essays in Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sosa, Ernest. 2015. Judgment and Agency. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Leslie. 2011. ‘Freedom of Judgment in Descartes, Spinoza, Hume, and Kant.’ In Inspirations from Kant: Essays, 95117. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sticker, Martin. 2015. ‘The Moral-Psychology of the Common Agent – A Reply to Ido Geiger.’ British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (5): 976–89.Google Scholar
Strawson, Galen. 2003. ‘Mental Ballistics or the Involuntariness of Spontaneity.’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103 (3): 227–56.Google Scholar
Sussman, David. 2005. ‘Perversity of the Heart.’ The Philosophical Review 114 (2): 153–77.Google Scholar
Tolley, Clinton. 2006. ‘Kant on the Nature of Logical Laws.’ Philosophical Topics 34 (1/2): 371407.Google Scholar
Tolley, Clinton. 2012. ‘The Generality of Kant's Transcendental Logic.’ Journal of the History of Philosophy 50 (3): 417–46.Google Scholar
Valaris, Markos. 2008. ‘Inner Sense, Self-Affection, and Temporal Consciousness in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason.’ Philosophers’ Imprint 8 (4): 118.Google Scholar
Waterlow, Sarah. 1982. Nature, Change, and Agency in Aristotle's Physics: A Philosophical Study. Oxford and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric, ed. and trans. 2009. Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: Background Source Materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Waxman, Wayne. 1991. Kant's Model of the Mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1973. ‘Ethical Consistency.’ In Problems of the Self: Philosophical Papers 1956–1972, 166–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1981. ‘Utilitarianism and Moral Self-Indulgence.’ In Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 4053. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen. 2003. ‘Kant and the Problem of Human Nature.’ In Essays on Kant's Anthropology, edited by Jacobs, Brian and Kain, Patrick, 3859. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen. 2008. Kantian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Young, J. Michael. 1992. ‘Translator's Introduction.’ In Immanuel Kant: Lectures on Logic, translated and edited by Young, J. Michael, xvxxxii. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zangwill, Nick. 2012. ‘Rationality and Moral Realism.’ Ratio 25 (3): 345–64.Google Scholar
Zagzebski, Linda. 1996. Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zagzebski, Linda. 2012. Epistemic Authority: A Theory of Trust, Authority, and Autonomy in Belief. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Melissa Merritt, University of New South Wales, Sydney
  • Book: Kant on Reflection and Virtue
  • Online publication: 26 April 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108344005.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Melissa Merritt, University of New South Wales, Sydney
  • Book: Kant on Reflection and Virtue
  • Online publication: 26 April 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108344005.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Melissa Merritt, University of New South Wales, Sydney
  • Book: Kant on Reflection and Virtue
  • Online publication: 26 April 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108344005.011
Available formats
×