Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-45s75 Total loading time: 0.415 Render date: 2021-11-30T19:16:14.834Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Jane Kneller
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, Meyer H., The Mirror and the Lamp. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1953Google Scholar
Abrams, Meyer H., Natural Supernaturalism: Tradition and Revolution in Romantic Literature. New York: W. W. Norton, 1973Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E., Kant's Theory of Freedom. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E., Kant's Theory of Taste. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl, The Cambridge Companion to German Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl, “The Critique of Metaphysics: Kant and Traditional Ontology,” in The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl, Kant and the Fate of Autonomy: Problems in the Appropriation of the Critical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl, “Kant, Fichte, and the Radical Primacy of the Practical,” in Kant and the Fate of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl, “On Paul Guyer's Kant and the Experience of Freedom,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 60(2) (1995).Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah, Lectures on Kant's Political Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982Google Scholar
Auxter, Thomas, Kant's Moral Teleology. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1982Google Scholar
Baier, Kurt, “Radical Virtue Ethics,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 13 (1988), pp. 126–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauemler, Alfred, Das Irrationalitätsproblem im ästhetischen Denken des 18. Jahrhunderts. Halle, 1923; republished Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1967.
Baeumler, Alfred, Kant's Kritik der Urteilskraft. Halle: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1923Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander G., Aesthetica. Hildesheim, 1961Google Scholar
Baumgarten, A. G., Meditationes Philosophicae de Nonnullis ad Poema Pertinentibus. Halle, 1735, trans. Karl Aschenbrenner and ed. Holther, William B. as Reflections on Poetry. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1954Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis W., Commentary on Kant's Critique of Practical Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis W., ed., Critique of Practical Reason and Other Writings in Moral Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis W., Early German Philosophy: Kant and His Predecessors. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1969Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis W., Essays on Kant and Hume. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1978Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis W., “Kant and the Right of Revolution,” Journal of the History of Ideas 32, 1971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Lewis W., Kant on History. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1963Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis W., “What have we learned from Kant?,” in Self and Nature in Kant's philosophy, ed. Wood, Allen W.. Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press, 1984Google Scholar
Behler, Ernst, German Romantic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behler, Ernst, “Review of Manfred Frank's Einführung in die Frühromantische Ästhetik, Athenäum” 3, Paderborn: F. Schohningh 1993Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C., The Early Political Writings of the German Romantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C., Enlightenment, Revolution and Romanticism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C., “Kant's Intellectual Development: 1746–1781,” chapter I of The Cambridge Companion to Kant, ed. Guyer, Paul. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Jay, Classic and Romantic German Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003Google Scholar
Bodmer, J. J. and Breitinger, J. J.Von dem Einfluss und Gebrauche der Einbildungs-Krafft; Zur Ausbesserung des Geschmackes; Genaue Untersuchung Aller Arten Beschreibungen, Worinne die ausserlesenste Stellen der berühmtesten Poeten dieser Zeit mit gründtlicher Freyheit beurtheilt werden. Frankfurt 1727Google Scholar
Böhme, Hartmut and Böhme, GernotDas Andere der Vernunft: Zur Entwicklung von Rationalitätsstrukturen am Beispiel Kants. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1996Google Scholar
Böhme, Hartmut and Böhme, Gernot, Aesthetics and Subjectivity: From Kant to Nietzsche. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1990Google Scholar
Bowie, Andrew, Aesthetics and Subjectivity: From Kant to Nietzsche. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1990Google Scholar
Bowie, Andrew, From Romanticism to Critical Theory: The Philosophy of German Literary Theory. London: Routledge, 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breazeale, Daniel, Fichte: Early Philosophical Writings. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988Google Scholar
Buchwald, Reinhard, Schiller. Wiesbaden, 1954Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst, “Hölderlin und der deutsche Idealismus,” in Hölderlin: Beiträge zu seinem Verständnis in unserm Jahrhundert, Alfred Kelletat, ed. Tübingen: Mohr, 1961Google Scholar
Constantine, David, Hölderlin. Oxford: Clarendon, 1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Donald, Kant's Aesthetic Theory. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1974Google Scholar
Eldridge, Richard, The Persistence of Romanticism: Essays in Philosophy and Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb, Early Philosophical Writings, DanielBreazeale, Breazeale, trans. and ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb Science of Knowledge, Heath, Peter and Lachs, John, ed. and trans. New York: Meredith, 1970Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb Einführung in die Frühromantische Ästhetik: Vorlesungen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1989, English trans. Elizabeth Millán-Zaibert, The Foundations of Early German Romanticism. Albany: SUNY Press, 2004
Fricke, Christel, Kants Theorie des reinen Geschmacksurteils. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frierson, Patrick R., Freedom and Anthropology in Kant's Moral Philosophy. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah, The Role of Taste in Kant's Theory of Cognition. New York: Garland Press, 1990Google Scholar
Gottsched, J. C., Versuch einer Critischen Dichtkunst: Ausgewählte Werke, eds. Joachim Birke and Birgitte Birke. New York, 1973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregor, Mary J., Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1974Google Scholar
Grenberg, Jeanine, Kant and the Ethics of Humility: A Story of Dependence, Corruption and Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul, “Feeling and Freedom: Kant on Aesthetics and Morality,” in Kant and the Experience of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul, Kant and the Claims of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979Google Scholar
Guyer, PaulKant and the Experience of Freedom: Essays on Aesthetics and Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul, Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul, Kant's Critique of the Power of Judgment, ed. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003Google Scholar
Harris, H. S., Hegel's Development: Toward the Sunlight 1770–1801. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972Google Scholar
Haym, Rudolf, Die Romantische Schule. Berlin: Gaertner, 1870Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, trans. James S. Churchill. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press, 1962Google Scholar
Helfer, Martha, The Retreat of Representation: The Concept of Darstellung in German Critical Discourse. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter, Aesthetic Judgment and the Moral Image of the World. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter, “Die Einheit der Subjektivität,” Philosophische Rundschau 3 (1955), “On the Unity of Subjectivity,” trans. G. Zöller, in The Unity of Reason: Essays on Kant's Philosophy, ed. Velkley, Richard, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter, “Fichte's Original Insight” (in Contemporary German Philosophy, ed. Christensen, Darrell E. et al. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1982, pp. 15–53)Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter, Der Grund im Bewußtstein: Hölderlins Denken in Jena (1794–95). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1992Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter, “Hegel und Hölderlin,” in Hegel im Kontext. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1987Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter, “Kant und Hegel,” in Selbstverhältnisse. Stuttgart: Reclam, 1982Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter, Konstellationen: Probleme und Debatten am Ursprung der idealistischen Philosophie (1789–1795). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1991Google Scholar
Hölderlin, FriedrichEssays and Letters on Theory, trans. and ed. Thomas Pfau. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1988Google Scholar
Hölderlin, Friedrich, “The Ground for ‘Empedocles,’ ” in Pfau, Thomas, Friedrich Hölderlin: Essays and Letters on Theory. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1988Google Scholar
Hölderlin, Friedrich, Hyperion or the Hermit in Greece, trans. W. R. Trask. New York: Ungar, 1965Google Scholar
Hölderlin, Friedrich, On the Law of Freedom, pp. 33–34.
Huch, Ricarda, Die Romantik: Blütezeit, Ausbreitung und Verfall. Hamburg: Rowholt, 1985 [1951]Google Scholar
Jacobs, B. and Kain, P.Essays in Kant's Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleist, Heinrich, Werke in einem Band. Munich: Karl Hanser Verlag, 1966Google Scholar
Kneller, Jane, “The Aesthetic Dimension of Kantian Autonomy”, in Feminist Interpretations of Immanuel Kant, ed. Robin, May Schott. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1997, pp. 173–189Google Scholar
Kneller, Jane, “Beauty, Autonomy and Respect for Nature,” L'Esthétique de Kant/Kants Ästhetik/Kant's Aesthetics. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1995Google Scholar
Kneller, Jane, “Discipline and Silence: Women and Imagination in Kant's Theory of Taste,” in Aesthetics in Feminist Perspective, eds. Hein, Hilde and Korsmeyer, Carolyn. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press, 1993Google Scholar
Kneller, Jane, “Fantasts and Fantasias: A Kantian Theory of Imaginative Free Play,” Evelyn Dunbar Early Music Festival Symposium, Northwestern University, February 2003.
Kneller, Jane, “Kant's Concept of Beauty,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 3 (1986).Google Scholar
Kneller, Jane, “Kant's Immature Imagination,” in Modern Engendering: Critical Feminist Readings in Modern Western Philosophy, ed. Ami, Bat Bar-on. Albany: SUNY Press, 1994Google Scholar
Kneller, Jane,ed., Novalis: Fichte Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M., “Aristotle and Kant on the Source of Value,” in Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred, Kant: A Biography. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe and Jean-Luc Nancy, trans. Barnard, Philip and Lester, Cheryl, The Literary Absolute: The Theory of Literature in German Romanticism. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1988Google Scholar
Ladd, John, The Metaphysical Elements of Justice. New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1965Google Scholar
Larmore, Charles, The Romantic Legacy. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996Google Scholar
Laursen, John Christian, “The Subversive Kant: The Vocabulary of ‘Public’ and ‘Publicity’,” Political Theory 14 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Willhelm, Philosophische Schriften, ed. Gerhardt, C. I.. Berlin, 1875–90, trans. Leroy Loemker, Philosophical Papers and Letters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956Google Scholar
Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim, Briefe, die neueste Literatur betreffend, 1759, Werke, ed. Göpfert, Herbart C.. Munich, 1973, VGoogle Scholar
Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim, Hamburgische Dramaturgie, Werke, ed. Göpfert, Herbart C.. Munich, 1973, IVGoogle Scholar
Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim,Laokoon, 1766, Werke, ed. Göpfert, Herbart C.. Munich, 1973, VIGoogle Scholar
Longueness, Beatrice, Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Critique of Pure Reason. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998Google Scholar
Louden, Robert B., Kant's Impure Ethics: From Rational Beings to Human Beings. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000Google Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf A., Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990Google Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf A., “Imagination and Temporality in Kant's Theory of the Sublime,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 42 [1984], pp. 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martindale, Colin, “How Can we Measure a Society's Creativity,?” in Dimensions of Creativity, ed. Boden, Margaret A.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996Google Scholar
Molnár, Geza, Novalis' “Fichte Studies”: The Foundations of His Aesthetics. The Hague: Mouton, 1970Google Scholar
Munzel, Felicitas, Kant's Conception of Moral Character: The “Critical” Link of Morality, Anthropology, and Reflective Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999Google Scholar
Neiman, Susan, The Unity of Reason: Rereading Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994Google Scholar
Neubauer, John, Novalis. Boston: Twayne, 1980Google Scholar
Neuhouser, Frederick, Fichte's Theory of Subjectivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, Onora, Constructions of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989Google Scholar
O'Neill, Onora, “Vindicating Reason,” chapter 9 of The Cambridge Companion to Kant, ed. Guyer, Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pluhar, Werner, “Introduction to Kant's Critique of Judgment,” trans. Pluhar, Werner. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett, 1987Google Scholar
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971Google Scholar
Reath, Andrews, “Two Conceptions of the Highest Good in Kant,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 26 (4) (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, Patrick, Kant's Political Philosophy. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield, 1983Google Scholar
Santner, Eric L., Friedrich Hölderlin: Hyperion and Selected Poems. New York: Continuum, 1990Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich, On the Aesthetic Education of Man, in a Series of Letters, trans. Wilkinson, Elizabeth M. and Willonghby, L. A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967Google Scholar
Schleuning, Peter, The Fantasia: 16th to 18th Centuries (I), trans. Howie, A. C.. Cologne: Arno Volk Verlag, 1971Google Scholar
Schmidt, James, ed., What is Enlightenment? Eighteenth Century Answers and Twentieth Century Questions. Riverside: University of California Press, 1996Google Scholar
Schott, Robin May, Cognition and Eros: A Critique of the Kantian Paradigm. Boston: Beacon Press, 1988Google Scholar
Schott, Robin May “The Gender of Enlightenment,” in Feminist Interpretations of Immanuel Kant. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1997Google Scholar
Schulz, Gerhard, Fichte-Studien, in Novalis Werke. Munich: Beck, 1969Google Scholar
Seyhan, Azade, Representation and Its Discontents: The Critical Legacy of German Romanticism. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992Google Scholar
Silber, John R., “Kant's Conception of the Highest Good as Immanent and Transcendent,” Philosophical Review 68 (1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Norman Kemp, Critique of Pure Reason. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1929Google Scholar
Tugendhat, Ernst, Self-Consciousness and Self-Determination, trans. Paul Stern. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986Google Scholar
Uerlings, Herbert, Friedrich von Hardenberg, genannt Novalis: Werk und Forschung. Stuttgart: Metzler, 1991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linden, Harry, Kantian Ethics and Socialism, Trans. Paul Sten. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1988Google Scholar
Velkley, Richard, Freedom and the End of Reason: On the Moral Foundations of Kant's Critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989Google Scholar
Velkey, Richard,ed. The Unity of Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994Google Scholar
Wilson, Holly L., “A Gap in American Kant Scholarship: Pragmatic Anthropology as the Application of Kantian Moral Theory,” in Akten des Siebten Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, ed. Funke, G.. Bonn: Bouvier, 1991Google Scholar
Wilson, Holly L., Kant's Pragmatic Anthropology. Albany, NY: State University New York Press, 2006Google Scholar
Wood, Allen, Self and Nature in Kant's Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984Google Scholar
Wilson, Holly L., Kant's Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999Google Scholar
Wood, David, Notes for a Romantic Encyclopedia: The Universal Brouillon. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2007Google Scholar
Yovel, Yirmiyahu, Kant and the Philosophy of History. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980Google Scholar
Zammito, John, The Genesis of Kant's Critique of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992Google Scholar
Zammito, John, Kant, Herder and the Birth of Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002Google Scholar
Zweig, Arnulf, Kant: Philosophical Correspondence 1759–99. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967Google Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Jane Kneller, Colorado State University
  • Book: Kant and the Power of Imagination
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487248.010
Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Jane Kneller, Colorado State University
  • Book: Kant and the Power of Imagination
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487248.010
Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Jane Kneller, Colorado State University
  • Book: Kant and the Power of Imagination
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487248.010
Available formats
×