Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-z5d2w Total loading time: 0.391 Render date: 2021-12-06T19:05:59.621Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2019

Get access

Summary

A proper understanding of democratic politics needs to account for the functioning of constitutional courts. These courts play an increasingly important role in democratic policy-making. More specifically, they (usually) have the ability to nullify legislation passed by Parliament and their rulings define a framework of possible future policies. Therefore, improving our understanding of how constitutional courts write their opinions – and in particular how certain case characteristics influence different aspects (outcome, justificatory ground) of the judicial decision in that case – is a relevant research objective.

Traditionally, legal scholarship on judicial review is predominantly normative, concentrating on how courts should decide cases and to what extent they should show deference towards the legislative branch. Political scientists, on the other hand, seem more interested in what motivates judges and which factors influence their decisions. In addition, while legal scholars traditionally use qualitative methods to analyse legal texts and judicial behaviour, political scientists increasingly and predominantly answer their research questions through quantitative methods. Furthermore, in contrast to the extensive body of literature on judicial behaviour in countries with a common law tradition (and especially on the US Supreme Court), there is little systematic empirical knowledge relating to European constitutional courts. The approach in this book is unique since it combines normative ideas on how courts should behave with an empirical analysis of the case law of the Belgian Constitutional Court (BeCC).

On the one hand, this book builds a normative framework, based on insights from deliberative theory, that sets out criteria for evaluating the performance of constitutional courts. In particular, the book discusses several ‘judicial good practices’ that allow the Court to enhance the deliberative component of policy-making. On the other hand, it is acknowledged that normative claims need to have a sensible idea of what may realistically shape judicial behaviour and, therefore, of what can actually be delivered. Legal theories about judicial review profit from a more empirically informed understanding of constitutional courts that builds upon and incorporates knowledge of the forces that shape their decisions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Judicial Review and Strategic Behaviour
An Empirical Case Law Analysis of the Belgian Constitutional Court
, pp. 1 - 10
Publisher: Intersentia
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Introduction
  • Josephine De Jaegere
  • Book: Judicial Review and Strategic Behaviour
  • Online publication: 26 June 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780688619.002
Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

  • Introduction
  • Josephine De Jaegere
  • Book: Judicial Review and Strategic Behaviour
  • Online publication: 26 June 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780688619.002
Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

  • Introduction
  • Josephine De Jaegere
  • Book: Judicial Review and Strategic Behaviour
  • Online publication: 26 June 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780688619.002
Available formats
×