Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-jpcp9 Total loading time: 2.539 Render date: 2022-12-01T02:50:55.928Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2021

Esmé Shirlow
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Judging at the Interface
Deference to State Decision-Making Authority in International Adjudication
, pp. 284 - 332
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aalberts, TE and Venzke, I (2017), ‘Moving beyond Interdisciplinary Turf Wars: Towards an Understanding of International Law as Practice’ in d’Aspremont, et al. (eds.), International Law as a Profession (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Abbott, KW (2008), ‘Enriching Rational Choice Institutionalism for the Study of International Law’, University of Illinois Law Review 5Google Scholar
Abi-Saab, G (1996), ‘The International Court as a World Court’ in Lowe, and Fitzmaurice, (eds.), Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Adede, AO (1977a), ‘International Law and Property of Aliens: The Old Order Changeth’, 19 Malaya Law Review 175Google Scholar
Adede, AO (1977b), ‘A Survey of Treaty Provisions on the Rule of Exhaustion of Local Remedies’, 18 Harvard International Law Journal 1Google Scholar
Adler, MH (1990), ‘The Exhaustion of the Local Remedies Rule after the International Court of Justice’s Decision in ELSI’, 39 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahdieh, R (2004), ‘Between Dialogue and Decree: International Review of National Courts’, 79 New York University Law Review 2029Google Scholar
Ajevski, M (2014), ‘Unstable Identities: The European Court of Human Rights and the Margin of Appreciation’, University of Oslo Faculty of Law Research Paper Series, Paper No. 2014-34Google Scholar
Akinsanya, AA (1980), The Expropriation of Multinational Property in the Third World (Praeger)Google Scholar
Alexander, L and Schauer, F (1997), ‘On Extrajudicial Constitutional Interpretation’, 110 Harvard Law Review 1359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, R (2009), A Theory of Constitutional Rights (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Alford, R (2002), ‘Federal Courts, International Tribunals, and the Continuum of Deference’, 43 Virginia Journal of International Law 675Google Scholar
Allan, TRS (2006), ‘Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Critique of “Due Deference”’, 65 Cambridge Law Journal 671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, TRS (2010), ‘Deference, Defiance, and Doctrine: Defining the Limits of Judicial Review’, 60 University of Toronto Law Review 41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, TRS (2011), ‘Judicial Deference and Judicial Review: Legal Doctrine and Legal Theory’, 127 Law Quarterly Review 96Google Scholar
Allars, M (1994), ‘On Deference to Tribunals, with Deference to Dworkin’, 20 Queen’s Law Journal 163Google Scholar
Allen, T (2005a), Property and the Human Rights Act 1998 (Hart)Google Scholar
Allen, T (2005b), ‘Transitional Justice and the Right to Property under the European Convention on Human Rights’, 16 Stellenbosch Law Review 413Google Scholar
Allen, T (2007), ‘Compensation for Property under the European Convention on Human Rights’, 28 Michigan Journal of International Law 287Google Scholar
Allen, T (2010), ‘Liberalism, Social Democracy and the Value of Property under the European Convention on Human Rights’, 59 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, JWF (1994), ‘Fuller’s Analysis of Polycentric Disputes and the Limits of Adjudication’, 53 Cambridge Law Journal 367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allott, P (1999), ‘International Law and the Idea of History’, 1 Journal of the History of International Law 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alschner, W (2014), ‘The Return of the Home State and the Rise of ‘Embedded’ Investor-State Arbitration’ in Lalani, and Lazo, (eds.), The Role of the State in Investor-State Arbitration (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar
Alter, K (2008a), ‘Agents or Trustees? International Courts in Their Political Context’, 14 European Journal of International Relations 33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, K (2008b), ‘Delegating to International Courts: Self-Binding vs. Other-Binding Delegation’, 71 Law & Contemporary Problems 37Google Scholar
Alter, K (2011), ‘The Evolving International Judiciary’, 7 Annual Review of Law and Social Science 387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, K (2014), The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights (Princeton University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, K, Helfer, L and Madsen, MR (2016), ‘How Context Shapes the Authority of International Courts’, 79 Law and Contemporary Problems 1Google Scholar
Alvarez, JE (2006), International Organizations as Law-Makers (Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, JE (2016), ‘Is Investor-State Arbitration “Public”?’, 7 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvik, I (2010), ‘The Hybrid Nature of Investment Treaty Arbitration: Straddling the National/International Divide’ in Eriksen, and Emberland, (eds.), The New International Law: An Anthology (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar
Alvik, I (2018), ‘Protection of Private Property in the Early Law of Nations’, 20 Journal of the History of International Law 217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amaza, IP (2012), ‘Multiplicity of International Dispute Settlement Forums: Avoiding the Risk of Parallel Proceedings’, 6 Dispute Resolution International 149Google Scholar
Ambrus, M (2013), ‘The European Court of Human Rights and Standards of Proof in Religion Cases’, 8 Religion and Human Rights 107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amerasinghe, CF (2008), Diplomatic Protection (Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Bar Association (2016), Investment Treaty Working Group: Task Force Report on the Investment Court System ProposalGoogle Scholar
Anand, RP (1963), ‘The International Court of Justice and Impartiality between Nations’, 12 Indian Year Book of International Affairs 12Google Scholar
Anand, RP (1965), ‘The Role of Individual and Dissenting Opinions in International Adjudication’, 14 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anand, RP (1969), Studies in International Adjudication (Oceana Publications Inc.)Google Scholar
Anthony, R (1998), ‘Which Agency Interpretations Should Get Judicial Deference? A Preliminary Inquiry’, 40 Administrative Law Review 121Google Scholar
Anzilotti, D (1928), Corso Di Diritto Internazionale (3rd edn, Athenaeum)Google Scholar
Arai, Y (1998), ‘The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Jurisprudence of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights’, 16 Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arai-Takahashi, Y (2002), The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR (Intersentia)Google Scholar
Arangio-Ruiz, G (1990), ‘Le Domaine Reserve: L’Organisation Internationale et Le Rapport Entre Droit International et Droit Interne’, Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, vol. 225Google Scholar
Arangio-Ruiz, G (1996), ‘The Plea of Domestic Jurisdiction before the International Court of Justice: Substance or Procedure?’ in Lowe, and Fitzmaurice, (eds.), Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice: Essays in Honour of Sir Robert Jennings (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Arato, J (2014), ‘The Margin of Appreciation in International Investment Law’, 54 Virginia Journal of International Law 2Google Scholar
Arendt, H (2006), Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought (Penguin Books)Google Scholar
Arnardóttir, OM (2015), ‘Organised Retreat? The Move from “Substantive” to “Procedural” Review in the ECtHR’s Case Law on the Margin of Appreciation’, European Society of International Law Conference Paper No. 4/2015Google Scholar
Arnardóttir, OM (2017), ‘The “Procedural Turn” under the European Convention on Human Rights and Presumptions of Convention Compliance’, 15 International Journal of Constitutional Law 9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arndt, JD (1959), ‘International Court of Justice – Legal Effect, Constitutional and International, of the Connally Reservation’, 28 University of Kansas Law Review 1Google Scholar
Ashforth, BE and Gibbs, BW (1990), ‘The Double-Edge of Organizational Legitimation’, 1 Organization Science 177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atik, J (2003), ‘Repenser NAFTA Chapter 11: A Catalogue of Legitimacy Critiques’, 3 Asper Review of International Business and Trade Law 215Google Scholar
Austin, J (1885), Lectures on Jurisprudence: Or, the Philosophy of Positive Law, vol. 2 (5th edn, Lawbook Exchange Ltd)Google Scholar
Ayres, L, Kavanaugh, K and Knafl, K (2003), ‘Within-Case and Across-Case Approaches to Qualitative Data Analysis’, 13 Qualitative Health Research 871CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, P (2006), Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis (Continuum)Google Scholar
Balcerzak, M (2004), ‘The Doctrine of Precedent in the International Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights’, 27 Polish Yearbook of International Law 131Google Scholar
Balkin, JM (1996), ‘A Night in the Topics: The Reason of Legal Rhetoric and the Rhetoric of Legal Reason’ in Brooks, and Gewirtz, (eds.), Law’s Stories: Narrative and Rhetoric in the Law (Yale University Press)Google Scholar
Banakar, R and Travers, M (eds.) (2013), Law and Social Theory (2nd edn, Hart)Google Scholar
Bankowski Z, MacCormick N, Summers R, and Jerzy W (1991), ‘On Method and Methodology’, in N MacCormick and R Summers (eds), Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study (Dartmouth)Google Scholar
Banks, K (1999), ‘NAFTA’s Article 1110 – Can Regulation Be Expropriation?’, 5 NAFTA: Law & Business Review of the Americas 499Google Scholar
Barkhuysen, T and van Emmerik, M (2009), ‘Legitimacy of European Court of Human Rights Judgments: Procedural Aspects’ in Huls, et al. (eds.), The Legitimacy of Highest Courts’ Ruling (TMC Asser Press)Google Scholar
Barnett, M and Finnemore, M (2004), Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics (Cornell University Press)Google Scholar
Barrie, G (1995), ‘International Human Rights Conventions: Public International Law Applicable to the Protection of Rights’, Journal of South African Law 66Google Scholar
Beck, G (2007), ‘The Idea of Human Rights between Value Pluralism and Conceptual Vagueness’, 25 Penn State International Law Review 615Google Scholar
Bedjaoui, M (1991), ‘The “Manufacture” of Judgments at the International Court of Justice’, 3 Pace Yearbook of International Law 29Google Scholar
Behn, D, Langford, M and Laudal Berge, T (2018), ‘Development or Democracy? Explaining Outcomes in Investment Treaty Arbitration, 38(3) Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business 333Google Scholar
Bellamy, R (2014), ‘The Democratic Legitimacy of International Human Rights Conventions: Political Constitutionalism and the European Convention on Human Rights’, 25 European Journal of International Law 1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bemelmans-Videc M (2011), ‘Guaranteeing the Authority and Effectiveness of the European Convention on Human Rights’ AS/Jur 44 Committee on Legal Affairs and Human RightsGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, S (2009), ‘Claiming Rights across Borders: International Human Rights and Democratic Sovereignty’, 103 American Political Science Review 691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennouna, M (2014), ‘The International Court of Justice: Bestriding Past and Present’ in Gaja, Grote Stoutenburg, (eds.), Enhancing the Rule of Law through the International Court of Justice (Brill)Google Scholar
Benvenisti, E (1999), ‘Margin of Appreciation, Consensus, and Universal Standards’, 31 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 843Google Scholar
Benvenisti, E (2013), ‘Sovereigns as Trustees of Humanity: On the Accountability of States to Foreign Stakeholders’, 107 American Journal of International Law 295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benvenisti, E (2018), ‘The Margin of Appreciation, Subsidiarity and Global Challenges to Democracy’, 9 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benvenisti, E and Harel, A (2017), ‘Embracing the Tension between National and International Human Rights Law: The Case for Discordant Parity’, 15(1) International Journal of Constitutional Law 36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, BL and Lune, H (2014), Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (8th edn, Pearson)Google Scholar
Bergbohm, C (1877), Staatsverträge Und Gesetze Als Quellen Des Völkerrechts (Mattiesen)Google Scholar
Berman, F (2013a), ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Rejoinder to Martins Paparinskis’ EJIL: Talk!Google Scholar
Berman, PS (2007), ‘A Pluralist Approach to International Law’, 32 Yale Journal of International Law 301Google Scholar
Berman, PS (2008), ‘Federalism and International Law Through the Lens of Legal Pluralism’, 73 Missouri Law Review 1149Google Scholar
Berman, PS (2012), Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law Beyond Borders (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, PS (2013), ‘Jurisgenerative Constitutionalism: Procedural Principles for Managing Global Legal Pluralism’, 20 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhardt, R (1993), ‘The Convention and Domestic Law’ in Macdonald, et al. (eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar
Besson, S (2009), ‘The Authority of International Law – Lifting the State Veil’, 31 Sydney Law Review 343Google Scholar
Besson, S (2011), ‘International Judges as Dispute-Settlers and Law-Enforcers: From International Law without Courts to International Courts without Law; A Reply to Anna Spain’, 34 Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 33Google Scholar
Bickel, AM (1962), The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics (Yale University Press)Google Scholar
Bilder, R (1982), ‘Some Limitations of Adjudication as an International Dispute Settlement Technique’, 23 Virginia Journal of International Law 1Google Scholar
Bilder, R (2007), ‘Adjudication: International Arbitral Tribunals and Courts’ in Zartman, (ed.), Peacemaking in International Conflict: Methods and Techniques (United States Institute of Peace)Google Scholar
Bilkova, V (2014), ‘The Standard of Equivalent Protection as a Standard of Review’ in Gruszczynski, and Werner, (eds.), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Bjørge, E and Miles, CA (eds.) (2017), Landmark Cases in Public International Law (Hart)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjorklund, A (2004), ‘Waiver and the Exhaustion of Local Remedies Rule in NAFTA Jurisprudence’ in Weiler (ed.), NAFTA Investment Law and Arbitration: Past Issues, Current Practice, Future ProspectsGoogle Scholar
Bjorklund, A (2007), ‘Private Rights and Public International Law: Why Competition among International Economic Law Tribunals Is Not Working’, 59 Hastings Law Journal 241Google Scholar
Blades, BW (2006) ‘The Exhausting Question of Local Remedies: Expropriation under NAFTA Chapter 11’, Oregon Review of International Law 31Google Scholar
Block-Lieb, S and Halliday, T (2007), ‘Incrementalisms in Global Lawmaking’, 32(3) Brooklyn Journal of International Law 851Google Scholar
Bodansky, D (1999), ‘The Legitimacy of International Governance: A Coming Challenge for International Environmental Law?’, 93 American Journal of International Law 596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodansky, D (2006), ‘International Law in Black and White’, 34 Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 285Google Scholar
Bodansky, D (2007), ‘The Concept of Legitimacy in International Law’ in Wolfrum, and Röben, (eds.), Legitimacy in International Law (Springer)Google Scholar
Bodansky, D (2012), ‘Legitimacy in International Law and International Relations’ in Dunoff, and Pollack, (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Bodie, TJ (1995), Politics and the Emergence of an Activist International Court of Justice (Greenwood Publishing Group)Google Scholar
Bodin J (1576), Six Books of the Commonwealth (translated by M.J. Tooley) (Blackwell Oxford)Google Scholar
Bomhoff, J (2010), ‘Genealogies of Balancing as Discourse’, 4 Law & Ethics of Human Rights 109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnitcha, J (2014), Substantive Protection under Investment Treaties: A Legal and Economic Analysis (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borchard, E (1919), The Diplomatic Protection of Citizens Abroad (Banks Law Publishing Co.)Google Scholar
Boyatzis, RE (1998), Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development (Sage Publications)Google Scholar
Bradley, C and Kelley, J (2008), ‘The Concept of International Delegation’, 71 Law and Contemporary Problems 1Google Scholar
Brems, E (1996), ‘The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights’, 56 Zeitschrift für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Volkerrecht 230Google Scholar
Brems, E (2017), ‘The “Logics” of Procedural-Type Review by the European Court of Human Rights’ in Brems, and Gerards, (eds.), Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brems, E and Gerards, J (eds.) (2017), Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brems, E and Lavrysen, L (2013), ‘Procedural Justice in Human Rights Adjudication: The European Court of Human Rights’, 35 Human Rights Quarterly 176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brems, E and Lavrysen, L (2015), ‘“Don’t Use a Sledgehammer to Crack a Nut”: Less Restrictive Means in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights’, 15 Human Rights Law Review 139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brierly, JL (1925), ‘Matters of Domestic Jurisdiction’, 6 British Yearbook of International Law 8Google Scholar
Briggs, H (1960), ‘Confidence, Apprehension and the International Court of Justice’, 54 American Society of International Law Proceedings 25Google Scholar
Bring, OE (1980), ‘The Impact of Developing States on International Customary Law Concerning Protection of Foreign Property’, 24 Scandinavian Studies in Law 97Google Scholar
Brisbane Telegraph (1927), ‘League of Nations: How It Can Fail - University Lecture’ (Trove)Google Scholar
Brölmann, C (2007), ‘Deterritorialization in International Law: Moving Away from the Divide Between National and International Law’ in Nijman, and Nollkaemper, (eds.), New Perspectives on the Divide Between National and International Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Brölmann, C (2013), ‘The Permanent Court of International Justice and the International Rights of Groups and Individuals’ in Tams and Fitzmaurice (eds.), Legacies of the Permanent Court of International Justice (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar
Broude, T (2012), ‘The Constitutional Function of Contemporary International Tribunals, or Kelsen’s Visions Vindicated’, 4 Goettingen Journal of International Law 519Google Scholar
Broude, T (2016), ‘Selective Subsidiarity and Dialectic Deference in the World Trade Organization’, 79 Law and Contemporary Problems 53Google Scholar
Brown, C (2002), ‘Review Essay – The Proliferation of International Courts and Tribunals: Finding Your Way through the Maze’, 3 Melbourne Journal of International Law 453Google Scholar
Brown, MB (2014), ‘Expertise and Deliberative Democracy’ in Elstub, and McLaverty, (eds.), Deliberative Democracy (Edinburgh University Press)Google Scholar
Brownlee, K (2004), ‘Obedience, Conformity, and Deference’, 10 Res Publica 267Google Scholar
Brownlie, I (1963), ‘The Relations of Nationality in Public International Law’, 39 British Yearbook of International Law 284Google Scholar
Brownlie, I (1967),‘The Justiciability of Disputes and Issues in International Relations’, 42 British Yearbook of International Law 123Google Scholar
Brownlie, I (1998), Principles of Public International Law (5th edn, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Brunnée, J and Toope, SJ (2000), ‘International Law and Constructivism: Elements of an International Theory of International Law’, 39 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 19Google Scholar
Brunnée, J and Toope, SJ (2010), Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryman, A and Burgess, RG (eds.) (2000), Analyzing Qualitative Data (Routledge)Google Scholar
Buchanan, A (2003), Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination (Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, A and Keohane, RO (2006), ‘The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions’, 20 Ethics & International Affairs 405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, R (2009), ‘Reconceptualising Law and Politics in the Transnational Constitutional and Legal Pluralist Approaches’, 5 Socio-Legal Review 21Google Scholar
Bücheler, G (2015), Proportionality in Investor-State Arbitration (Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bultrini, A (2010), ‘The European Convention on Human Rights and the Rule of Prior Exhaustion of Domestic Remedies in International Law’, 20 Italian Yearbook of International Law 101Google Scholar
Burke-White, WW (2008a), ‘The Argentine Financial Crisis: State Liability under BITs and the Legitimacy of the ICSID System’, 3 Asian Journal of WTO and International Health Law and Policy 199Google Scholar
Burke-White, WW (2008b), ‘Proactive Complementarity: The International Criminal Court and National Courts in the Rome System of International Justice’, 49 Harvard International Law Journal 53Google Scholar
Burke-White, WW and von Staden, A (2008), ‘Investment Protection in Extraordinary Times: The Interpretation and Application of Non-Precluded Measures Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties’, 48 Virginia Journal of International Law 307Google Scholar
Burke-White, WW and von Staden, A (2010), ‘Private Litigation in a Public Law Sphere: The Standard of Review in Investor-State Arbitrations’, 35 Yale Journal of International Law 283Google Scholar
Butler, N (2013), ‘Possible Improvements to the Framework of International Investment Arbitration’, 14 Journal of World Investment & Trade 613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvert, C and Hayes, J (2012), ‘To Defer or Not to Defer? Deference and Its Differential Impact on First Amendment Rights in the Roberts Court’, 63 Case Western Reserve Law Review 13Google Scholar
Candia, G (2014), ‘Comparing Diverse Approaches to the Margin of Appreciation: The Case of the European and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Law School Working Paper Series, Paper No. 2014/01Google Scholar
Caporaso, JA (2000), ‘Changes in the Westphalian Order: Territory, Public Authority, and Sovereignty’, 2 International Studies Review 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardozo, B (1947), ‘Law and Literature’ in Hall, and Patterson, (eds.), Selected Writings of Benjamin Nathan Cardozo (Fallon Publications)Google Scholar
Carolan, E (2009), The New Separation of Powers (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Caron, DD (1991), ‘Comparative Analysis of International Dispute Resolution Institutions’, 85 Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caron, DD (1992), ‘Reputation and Reality in the ICSID Annulment Process: Understanding the Distinction between Annulment and Appeal’, 7 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caron, DD (1993), ‘The Legitimacy of the Collective Authority of the Security Council’, 87 American Journal of International Law 552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caron, DD (2000), ‘War and International Adjudication: Reflections on the 1899 Peace Conference’, 94 American Journal of International Law 4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caron, DD (2007a), ‘Towards a Political Theory of International Courts and Tribunals’, 24 Berkeley Journal of International Law 401Google Scholar
Caron, DD (2007b), ‘The Iran-US Claims Tribunal and Investment Arbitration: Understanding the Claims Settlement Declaration as a Retrospective BIT’ in Drahozal, and Gibson, (eds.), The Iran-US Claims Tribunal at 25 (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Caron, DD (2012), ‘Framing the Work of ICSID Annulment Committees’, 6 World Arbitration & Mediation Review 173Google Scholar
Caron, DD (2014), ‘International Claims and Compensation Bodies’ in Romano et al. (eds.), International Claims and Compensation Bodies 279Google Scholar
Caron, DD (2015), ‘The United Nations Compensation Commission: Understanding an Institution and the Three Phases of Its Work’ in Feighery, et al. (eds.), War Reparations and the UN Compensation Commission: Designing Compensation After Conflict (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Caron, DD and Shirlow, E (2015), ‘Most-Favored-Nation Treatment: Substantive Protection’ in Kinnear, et al. (eds.), Building International Investment Law: The First 50 Years of ICSID (Wolters Kluwer)Google Scholar
Caron, DD and Shirlow, E (2018), ‘Dissecting Backlash: The Unarticulated Causes of Backlash and its Unintended Consequences’ in Ulfstein, and Føllesdal, (eds.), The Judicialization of International Law – A Mixed Blessing? (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Caron, DD and Shirlow, E (2019), ‘Article 25(2)(b)’ in Fouret, et al. (eds.), The ICSID Convention, Rules and Regulations: A Practical Commentary (Edward Elgar)Google Scholar
Carter, Jr W (2008), ‘Rethinking Subsidiarity in International Human Rights Adjudication’, 30 Hamline Journal of Public Law and Policy 319Google Scholar
Casas, M (2016), ‘Nationalities of Convenience, Personal Jurisdiction, and Access to Investor-State Dispute Settlement’, 49 International Law and Politics 63Google Scholar
Casini, L (2014), ‘“Down the Rabbit-Hole”: The Projection of the Public/Private Distinction beyond the State’, 12 International Journal of Constitutional Law 402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cass, D (1996), ‘Navigating the Newstream: Recent Critical Scholarship in International Law’, 65 Nordic Journal of International Law 341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cass, D (2001), ‘The “Constitutionalisation” of International Trade Law: Judicial Norm-Generation as the Engine of Constitutional Development in International Trade’, 12 European Journal of International Law 39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, A (1990), ‘Remarks on Scelle’s Theory of “Role Splitting” (Dedoublement Fonctionnel) in International Law’, 1 European Journal of International Law 210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caudle, S (2010), ‘Qualitative Data Analysis’ in Wholey, et al. (eds.), Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation (Jossey-Bass)Google Scholar
Charlotin, D (2017), ‘US Court Declines to Set Aside Mesa v. Canada Award’ IAReporterGoogle Scholar
Chen, T (2012), ‘The Standard of Review and the Roles of ICSID Arbitral Tribunals in Investor-State Dispute Settlement’, 5 Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal 23Google Scholar
Cheng, B (2006), General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (1st edn, Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Chesney, R (2006), ‘Disaggregating Deference: The Judicial Power and Executive Treaty Interpretations’, 92 Iowa Law Review 1723Google Scholar
Cheyne, I (2014), ‘Deference and the Use of the Public Policy Exception in International Courts and Tribunals’ in Gruszczynski, and Werner, (eds.), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Christiano, T (2010), ‘Democratic Legitimacy and International Institutions’ in Besson, and Tasioulas, (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford University Press) 119Google Scholar
Christiano, T (2012), Authority (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)Google Scholar
Christie, GC (1962), ‘What Constitutes a Taking of Property under International Law?’, 38 British Yearbook of International Law 307Google Scholar
Christoffersen, J and Madsen, MR (eds.) (2011), The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics (Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christoffersen, J and Madsen, MR (2013), ‘Postscript: Understanding the Past, Present, and Future of the European Court of Human Rights’ in Christoffersen, and Madsen, (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics (2nd edn, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Christol, C (1959), ‘The Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice’, 33 Southern California Law Review 378Google Scholar
Clark, I (2007), International Legitimacy and World Society (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Clayton, R (2004), ‘Judicial Deference and “Democratic Dialogue”: The Legitimacy of Judicial Intervention under the Human Rights Act 1998’, Public Law 33Google Scholar
Clayton, R (2006), ‘Principles for Judicial Deference’, 11 Judicial Review 109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, R and Ghaly, K (2007), ‘Shifting Standards of Review’, 12 Judicial Review 210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coe, Jr JJ (2003), ‘Taking Stock of NAFTA Chapter 11 in Its Tenth Year: An Interim Sketch of Selected Themes, Issues, and Methods’, 36 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 1381Google Scholar
Cohen, HG (2009), ‘Can International Law Work? A Constructivist Expansion’, 27 Berkeley Journal of International Law 636Google Scholar
Cohen, HG (2010), ‘From International Law to International Conflicts of Law: The Fragmentation of Legitimacy’, 104 American Society of International Law Proceedings 49Google Scholar
Cohen, HG (2012a), ‘Finding International Law, Part II: Our Fragmenting Legal Community’, 44 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 1049Google Scholar
Cohen, HG (2012b), ‘From Fragmentation to Constitutionalization’, 24 Pacific McGeorge Global Business & Development Law Journal 381Google Scholar
Cohen, HG (2015), ‘International Precedent and the Practice of International Law’ in Helfand, (ed.) (Cambridge University Press)172Google Scholar
Cohen, J (2010), ‘Sovereignty in the Context of Globalization: A Constitutional Pluralist Perspective’ in Besson, and Tasioulas, (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Cohen, M (1927), ‘Property and Sovereignty’, 13 Cornell Law Quarterly 8Google Scholar
Cohen-Eliya, M and Porat, I (2011), ‘Proportionality and the Culture of Justification’, 59 American Journal of Comparative Law 463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colangelo, AJ (2009), ‘Universal Jurisdiction as an International “False Conflict” of Laws’, 30 Michigan Journal of International Law 881Google Scholar
Colangelo, AJ (2016), ‘A Systems Theory of Fragmentation and Harmonization’, 49 International Law and Politics 1Google Scholar
Collins, D (2016), ‘The Line of Equilibrium: Improving the Legitimacy of Investment Treaty Arbitration through the Application of the WTO’s General Exceptions’, 32 Arbitration International 575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colwell, B (2007), ‘Deference or Respect? Status Management Practices Among Prison Inmates’, 70 Social Psychology Quarterly 442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Contreras, P (2012), ‘National Discretion and International Deference in the Restriction of Human Rights: A Comparison Between the Jurisprudence of the European and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’, 11 Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights 28Google Scholar
Coquiz, J (1977), ‘The Problem of Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice’, 52 Philippine Law Journal 154Google Scholar
Costa, J-P (2011), ‘On the Legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights’ Judgments’, 7 European Constitutional Law Review 173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottier, T et al., (2017) ‘The Principle of Proportionality in International Law: Foundations and Variations’, 18 Journal of World Investment & Trade 628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotula, L (2015), ‘Property in a Shrinking Planet: Fault Lines in International Human Rights and Investment Law’, 11 International Journal of Law in Context 113Google Scholar
Cotula, L (2017), ‘Democracy and International Investment Law’, 30 Leiden Journal of International Law 351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craven, M (2003), ‘Unity, Diversity and the Fragmentation of International Law’, 14 Finnish Yearbook of International Law 3Google Scholar
Crawford, J (2002), International Law as an Open System: Selected Essays (Cameron May)Google Scholar
Crawford, J (2005), The International Law Commission’s articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text and Commentaries (3rd edn, Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Crawford, J (2006), ‘Multilateral Rights and Obligations in International Law’, Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, vol. 319 (Brill)Google Scholar
Crawford, J (2013), State Responsibility: The General Part (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J (2014), ‘Chance, Order, Change: The Course of International Law, General Course on Public International Law’ in Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, vol. 365 (Hague Academy of International Law)Google Scholar
Crawford, J and Brownlie, I (2012), Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (8th edn, Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J and Koskenniemi, M (eds.) (2012), The Cambridge Companion to International Law (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crema, L (2010), ‘Disappearance and New Sighting of Restrictive Interpretation(s)’, 21 European Journal of International Law 681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creswell, JW and Plano Clark, VL (2011), Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd edn, Sage Publications)Google Scholar
Croquet, N (2010), ‘The European Court of Human Rights’ Norm-Creation and Norm-Limiting Processes: Resolving a Normative Tension’, 17 Columbia Journal of European Law 307Google Scholar
Cross, FB (2007), Decision Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals (Stanford University Press)Google Scholar
Crow, K (2017), ‘A Taxonomy of Proportionality in International Courts’ iCourts Working Paper Series, Paper No. 107Google Scholar
Cunliffe, J and Reeve, A (1999), ‘Dialogic Authority’, 19 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, AC (2001), ‘Critical Reflections on the Westphalian Assumptions of International Law and Organization: A Crisis of Legitimacy’, 27 Review of International Studies 133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czapiewska, M (1990), ‘General Principles of International Responsibility of the State for Nationalization of Foreign Investments as One of the Means of Their Protection’, 2 Sri Lanka Journal of International Law 59Google Scholar
Ҫali, B (2016), ‘From Flexible to Variable Standards of Judicial Review: The Responsible Domestic Courts Doctrine at the European Court of Human Rights’ in Arnardóttir, and Buyse, (eds.), Shifting Centres of Gravity in Human Rights Protection: Rethinking Relations between the ECHR, EU, and National Legal Orders (Routledge)Google Scholar
Ҫali, B (2018), ‘Explaining Variation in the Intrusiveness of Regional Human Rights Remedies in Domestic Orders’, 16 International Journal of Constitutional Law 214Google Scholar
Çoban, AR (2004), Protection of Property Rights within the European Convention on Human Rights (Ashgate)Google Scholar
d’Aspremont, J (2012), ‘The Permanent Court of International Justice and Domestic Courts: A Variation in Roles’ in Tams and Fitzmaurice (eds.), Legacies of the Permanent Court of International Justice (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar
d’Aspremont, J (2020), ‘The Control over Knowledge by International Courts and Arbitral Tribunals’ in Schultz, and Ortino, (eds.), Oxford Handbook of International Arbitration (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
d’Aspremont, J and de Brabandere, E (2011), ‘The Complementary Faces of Legitimacy in International Law: The Legitimacy of Origin and the Legitimacy of Exercise’, 34 Fordham International Law Journal 190Google Scholar
d’Aspremont, J and Mbengue, MM (2014), ‘Strategies of Engagement with Scientific Fact-Finding in International Adjudication’, 5 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Alterio, E (2011), ‘From Judicial Comity to Legal Comity: A Judicial Solution to Global Disorder?’, 9 International Journal of Constitutional Law 394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Amato, A (1983), ‘Legal Uncertainty’, 71 California Law Review 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Ascoli, S and Scherr, KM (2007), ‘The Rule of Prior Exhaustion of Local Remedies in the International Law Doctrine and Its Application in the Specific Context of Human Rights Protection’ 16(1) Italian Yearbook of International Law 117Google Scholar
Daly P (2011), ‘Deference on Questions of Law’, 74 Modern Law Review 694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, P (2012), A Theory of Deference in Administrative Law: Basis, Application and Scope (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dan-Cohen, M (1994), ‘In Defense of Defiance’, 23 Philosophy and Public Affairs 24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniel, J (2017), ‘Scrutinizing Deference to Administrative Agencies’, The Regulatory ReviewGoogle Scholar
Danilowicz, W (1983), ‘The Relation between International Law and Domestic Law in the Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice’, 12 Polish Yearbook of International Law 153Google Scholar
Davis, H (1996), ‘Democratic Disablement and the Right to Property in the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights’, 1 Journal of Civil Liberties 125Google Scholar
de Brabandere, E (2012), ‘Arbitral Decisions as a Source of International Investment Law’ in Gazzini, and de Brabandere, (eds.), International Investment Law: The Sources of Rights and Obligations (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar
de Brabandere, E (2015), Investment Treaty Arbitration as Public International Law: Procedural Aspects and Implications (1st edn, Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
de Bustamente y Sirven, AS (1924), ‘The Permanent Court of International Justice’, 9 Minnesota Law Review 122Google Scholar
De Dycker, S (2010), ‘Private International Law Disputes before the International Court of Justice’, 1 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Londras, F and Dzehtsiarou, K (2015), ‘Managing Judicial Innovation in the European Court of Human Rights’, 15 Human Rights Law Review 523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Schutter, O and Tulkens, F (2008), ‘Rights in Conflict: The European Court of Human Rights as a Pragmatic Institution’ in Brems, (ed.), Conflicts between Fundamental Rights (Intersentia)Google Scholar
de Vattel, E (1797), The Law of Nations: Or, Principles of the Law of Nature Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns (GG & J Robinson)Google Scholar
De Ville, JR (2004), ‘Deference as Respect and Deference as Sacrifice’, 20 South African Journal on Human Rights 577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Ville, JR (2006), ‘Deference and Différance: Judicial Review and the Perfect Gift’, 9 Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 1Google Scholar
de Visscher, C (1956), ‘Reflections on the Present Prospects of International Adjudication’, 50 American Journal of International Law 467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Visscher, C (1968), Theory and Reality in Public International Law (PE Corbett tr., Princeton University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Wet, E (2007), ‘The Emerging International Constitutional Order: The Implications of Hierarchy in International Law for the Coherence and Legitimacy of International Decision-Making’, 10 Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 7Google Scholar
Delmas-Marty, M (2009), Ordering Pluralism: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding the Transnational Legal World (Hart)Google Scholar
Demirkol, B (2018), Judicial Acts and Investment Treaty Arbitration (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deneen, C (1930), ‘The Permanent Court of International Justice’, 35 Commercial Law League Journal 178Google Scholar
Desierto, DA (2012), Necessity and National Emergency Clauses: Sovereignty in Modern Treaty Interpretation (Martinus Nijhoff)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dick, JC (1978), ‘The Bounds of Authority’, 4 Social Theory and Practice 375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, MJ (1996), ‘Fairness in International Laws and Institutions by Thomas M. Franck’, 55 Cambridge Law Journal 617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodge, W (2006), ‘Investor-State Dispute Settlement between Developed Countries: Reflections on the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement’, 39 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 1Google Scholar
Dolzer, R (2002), ‘Indirect Expropriations: New Developments?’, 11 New York University Environmental Law Journal 64Google Scholar
Donoghue, J (2012), ‘The Role of the World Court Today’, 47 Georgia Law Review 181Google Scholar
Donoho, DL (2001), ‘Autonomy, Self-Governance, and the Margin of Appreciation: Developing a Jurisprudence of Diversity within Universal Human Rights’, 15 Emory International Law Review 391Google Scholar
Dothan, S (2018), ‘Margin of Appreciation and Democracy: Human Rights and Deference to Political Bodies’, 9(2) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Z (2003), ‘The Hybrid Foundations of Investment Treaty Arbitration’, 74 British Yearbook of International Law 151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Z (2009), The International Law of Investment Claims (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Z (2014a), ‘Property, Investment and the Scope of Investment Protection Obligations’ in Douglas, et al. (eds.), The Foundations of International Investment Law: Bringing Theory into Practice (Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Z (2014b), ‘International Responsibility for Domestic Adjudication: Denial of Justice Deconstructed’, 63 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Z, Pauwelyn, J and Viñuales, JE (eds.) (2014), The Foundations of International Investment Law: Bringing Theory into Practice (Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drezner, D (2001), ‘On the Balance between International Law and Democratic Sovereignty’, 2 Chicago Journal of International Law 321Google Scholar
Dugard, J (2004), ‘Fifth Report on Diplomatic Protection’ UN Doc. A/CN.4/538Google Scholar
Dugard, J (2005), ‘Diplomatic Protection and Human Rights: The Draft Articles of the International Law Commission’, 24 Australian Year Book of International Law 75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duguit, L (1917), ‘The Law and the State’, 31 Harvard Law Review 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duhaime, B (2014), ‘Subsidiarity in the Americas: What Room Is There for Deference in the Inter-American System?’ in Gruszczynski, and Werner, (eds.), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Dumberry, P and Stone, J (2014), ‘International Law, Whether You Like It or Not: An Analysis of Arbitral Tribunal Practice Regarding the Applicable Law in Deciding State Contracts Disputes under the ICSID Convention in the Twenty-First Century’, 5 Yearbook of International Investment Law and Policy 477Google Scholar
Duncan, K (2004), ‘Revisiting the Rights of Man: Georg Jellinek on Rights and the State’, 22 Law and History Review 493Google Scholar
Dunoff, JL and Pollack, MA (2012), ‘International Law and International Relations: Introducing an Interdisciplinary Dialogue’ in Dunoff, and Pollack, (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunoff, JL (2006), ‘Constitutional Conceits: The WTO’s “Constitution” and the Discipline of International Law’, 17 European Journal of International Law 647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunoff, JL and Trachtman, J (1999), ‘Economic Analysis of International Law’, 24 Yale Law Journal Online 1Google Scholar
Dupuy, P-M (1997), ‘The Constitutional Dimension of the Charter of the United Nations Revisited’, 1 Max Planck Yearbook of International Law 1Google Scholar
Dupuy, P-M (1999), ‘The Danger of Fragmentation or Unification of the International Legal System and the International Court of Justice’, 31 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 791Google Scholar
Dupuy, P-M (2007), ‘A Doctrinal Debate in the Globalisation Era: On the “Fragmentation” of International Law’, 1 European Journal of Legal Studies 25Google Scholar
Dupuy, P-M (2009), ‘Unification Rather than Fragmentation of International Law? The Case of International Investment Law and Human Rights Law’ in Dupuy, et al. (eds.), Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration (Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupuy, P-M and Viñuales, JE (2012), ‘Human Rights and Investment Disciplines: Integration in Progress’ in Bungenberg, et al. (eds.), International Investment Law (Nomos)Google Scholar
Dupuy, P-M and Viñuales, JE (2013), ‘The Challenge of “Proliferation”: An Anatomy of the Debate’ in Romano, et al. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Dworkin, R (1977), Taking Rights Seriously (Duckworth)Google Scholar
Dworkin, R (1986), Law’s Empire: Legal Theory (Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Dworkin, R (1996), Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution (Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Dye, VD (2013), ‘“Deference as Respect” in WTO Standard of Review’, 12 Journal of International Trade Law and Policy Information 23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyson, LJ (2006), ‘Some Thoughts on Judicial Deference’, 11 Judicial Review 103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D (1997), ‘The Politics of Deference: Judicial Review and Democracy’ in Taggart, (ed.), The Province of Administrative Law (Hart)Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D (1998), ‘Law as Justification: Etienne Mureinik’s Conception of Legal Culture’, 14 South African Journal on Human Rights 11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D (2003), ‘Humpty Dumpty Rules or the Rule of Law: Legal Theory and the Adjudication of National Security’, 28 Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 1Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D (2011), ‘Positivism and the Pesky Sovereign22 European Journal of International Law 363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dzehtsiarou, K and Greene, A (2011), ‘Legitimacy and the Future of the European Court of Human Rights: Critical Perspectives from Academia and Practitioners’, 12 German Law Journal 1707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ederington, LB (1997), ‘Property as a Natural Institution: The Separation of Property from Sovereignty in International Law’, 13 American University of International Law Review 263Google Scholar
Edwards, R (2002), ‘Judicial Deference under the Human Rights Act’, 65 Modern Law Review 859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egger, P and Pfaffermayr, M (2004), ‘The Impact of Bilateral Investment Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment’, 32 Journal of Comparative Economics 788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehlermann, C-D and Lockhart, N (2004), ‘Standard of Review in WTO Law’, 7 Journal of International Economic Law 491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Boudouhi, S (2015), ‘A Comparative Approach of the National Margin of Appreciation Doctrine before the ECtHR, Investment Tribunals and WTO Dispute Settlement Bodies’ RSCAS Global Governance Programme Paper No. 2015/27Google Scholar
El Hayek, I and Gilles, A (2014), ‘Multifaceted Settlement of International Investments Disputes: Thoughts about the Variety of Instruments Claiming Their Applicability to the Investment Dispute’, 29 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eleftheriadis, P (2010), ‘The Law of Laws’, 1(4) Transnational Legal Theory 597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, T (1983), The International Court of Justice and Some Contemporary Problems: Essays on International Law (Martinus Nijhoff)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, M (2010), ‘Proportionality and Deference: The Importance of a Structured Approach’ in Forsyth, et al. (eds.), Effective Judicial Review: A Cornerstone of Good Governance (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Elliott, M (2015a), ‘Justification, Calibration and Substantive Judicial Review: Putting Doctrine in Its Place’ in Wilberg, and Elliott (eds.), , The Scope and Intensity of Substantive Review: Traversing Taggart’s Rainbow (Hart)Google Scholar
Elliott, M (2015b), ‘From Bifurcation to Calibration: Twin-Track Deference and the Culture of Justification’ in Wilberg, and Elliott, (eds.), The Scope and Intensity of Substantive Review: Traversing Taggart’s Rainbow (Hart)Google Scholar
Ellis, J (2011), ‘General Principles and Comparative Law’, 22 European Journal of International Law 949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ely, JH (1980), Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review (Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Emberland, M (2004), ‘The Corporate Veil in the Jurisprudence of the Human Rights Committee and the Inter-American Court and Commission of Human Rights’, 4 Human Rights Law Review 257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emberland, M (2006), The Human Rights of Companies: Exploring the Structure of ECHR Protection (Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emberland, M (2007), ‘The International Court of Justice and Companies: Is It Possible to Discern a “Structural Bias” at the Court Regarding Private Economic Enterprise?’, 9 International Community Law Review 187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endicott, T (2001), ‘International Meaning: Comity in Fundamental Rights Adjudication’, 13 International Journal of Refugee Law 280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endicott, T (2015), ‘Comity among Authorities’, 68 Current Legal Problems 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engle, E (2012), ‘The History of the General Principle of Proportionality: An Overview’, 10 Dartmouth Law Journal 1Google Scholar
Enoch, D (2014), ‘A Defense of Moral Deference’, 111 Journal of Philosophy 229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esty, D (2006), ‘Good Governance at the Supranational Scale: Globalizing Administrative Law’, 115 Yale Law Journal 1490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evenson, E (2001), ‘Reforms Ahead: Enlargement of the Council of Europe and the Future of the Strasbourg System’, 1 Human Rights Law Review 219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing-Chow, M (2001), ‘Investor Protection in Free Trade Agreements: Lessons from North America’, 5 Singapore Journal of International and Comparative Law 748Google Scholar
Eyffinger, A (2007a), The 1907 Hague Peace Conference (JudiCap)Google Scholar
Eyffinger, A (2007b), ‘A Highly Critical Moment: Role and Record of the 1907 Hague Peace Conference’, 54 Netherlands International Law Review 197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fachiri, AP (1932), The Permanent Court of International Justice: Its Constitution, Procedure and Work (2nd edn, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Fahner, JH (2013), ‘Margin of Appreciation in Investor-State Arbitration: The Prevalence and Desirability of Discretion and Deference’, 26 Hague Year Book of International Law 422Google Scholar
Fahner, JH (2016), ‘From Dispute Settlement to Judicial Review? The Deference Debate in International Investment Law’ in Duchateau, et al. (eds.), Evolution in Dispute Resolution: From Adjudication to ADR? (Eleven International Publishing)Google Scholar
Falk, RA (1964), The Role of Domestic Courts in the International Legal Order (Syracuse University Press)Google Scholar
Falk, RA (1967), ‘New Approaches to the Study of International Law’, 61 American Journal of International Law 477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fassbender, B (2003), ‘Sovereignty and Constitutionalism in International Law’ in Walker, (ed.), Sovereignty in Transition (Hart)Google Scholar
Fauchald, OK (2008), ‘The Legal Reasoning of ICSID Tribunals – An Empirical Analysis’, 19 European Journal of International Law 301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fawcett, JES (1954), ‘The Exhaustion of Local Remedies: Substance or Procedure?’, 31 British Yearbook of International Law 452Google Scholar
Feldman, M (2017), ‘Investment Arbitration Appellate Mechanism Options: Consistency, Accuracy, and Balance of Power’, 32 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 528Google Scholar
Feller, AH (1935), The Mexican Claims Commissions: 1923–1934, A Study in the Law and Procedure of International Tribunals (Macmillan)Google Scholar
Fereday, J and Muir-Cochrane, E (2006), ‘Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development’, 5 International Journal of Qualitative Methods 80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari-Bravo, L (1983), ‘International and Municipal Law: The Complementarity of Legal Systems’ in Macdonald, and Johnston, (eds.), The Structure and Process of International Law: Essays in Legal Philosophy, Doctrine and Theory (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar
Ferrero, G (1942), The Principles of Power: The Great Political Crises of History (Putnam’s)Google Scholar
Finnis, J (2011), Natural Law and Natural Rights (2nd edn, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, A and Teubner, G (2004), ‘Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law’, 25 Michigan Journal of International Law 999Google Scholar
Fish, S (1989), Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies (Clarendon)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, S (2000), Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities (11th edn, Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Flanders, CW (2009), ‘Toward a Theory of Persuasive Authority’, 62 Oklahoma Law Review 55Google Scholar
Føllesdal, A (2009), ‘Why the European Court of Human Rights Might Be Democratically Legitimate – A Modest Defense27 Nordisk Tidsskrift for Menneskerettigheter 289Google Scholar
Føllesdal, A (2013a) ‘Much Ado About Nothing? International Judicial Review of Human Rights in Well-Functioning Democracies’ in Føllesdal, et al., The Legitimacy of International Human Rights Regimes (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Føllesdal, A (2013b), ‘The Principle of Subsidiarity as a Constitutional Principle in International Law’, 2 Global Constitutionalism 37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Føllesdal, A (2016), ‘Subsidiarity and International Human Rights Courts: Respecting Self-Governance and Protecting Human Rights – Or Neither?’, 79 Law and Contemporary Problems 147Google Scholar
Foster, C (2010), ‘Burden of Proof in International Courts and Tribunals’, 29 Australian Year Book of International Law 27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, GK (2011), ‘Striking a Balance between Investor Protections and National Sovereignty: The Relevance of Local Remedies in Investment Treaty Arbitration’, 49 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 201Google Scholar
Foucault, M (2007), The Politics of Truth (MIT Press)Google Scholar
Fragale, AR et al. (2012), ‘Appeasing Equals: Lateral Deference in Organizational Communication’, 57 Administrative Science Quarterly 373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francioni, F (1999), ‘Customary International Law and the European Convention on Human Rights’, 9 Italian Yearbook of International Law 11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franck, S (2006), ‘The Role of International Arbitrators’, 12 ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law 499Google Scholar
Franck, S (2009), ‘Development and Outcomes of Investment Treaty Arbitration’, 50 Harvard International Law Journal 435Google Scholar
Franck, TM (1988), ‘Legitimacy in the International System’, 82 American Journal of International Law 705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franck, TM (1990), The Power of Legitimacy among Nations (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Franck, TM (1998), Fairness in International Law and Institutions (Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franck, TM (2006b), ‘The Power of Legitimacy and the Legitimacy of Power: International Law in an Age of Power Disequilibrium’, 100 American Journal of International Law 88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franck, TM (2008), ‘On Proportionality of Countermeasures in International Law’, 102 American Journal of International Law 715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredman, S (2006), ‘From Deference to Democracy: The Role of Equality under the Human Rights Act 1998’, 122 Law Quarterly Review 53Google Scholar
Freeman, E (2003), ‘Regulatory Expropriation under NAFTA Chapter 11: Some Lessons from the European Court of Human Rights’, 42 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 117Google Scholar
Friedheim, RL and Kadane, JB (1970), ‘Quantitative Content Analysis of the United Nations Seabed Debate: Methodology and a Continental Shelf Case Study’, 24 International Organization 479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, S (1953), Expropriation in International Law (Stevens & Sons Limited)Google Scholar
Friedmann, W (1964), The Changing Structure of International Law (Stevens & Sons Limited)Google Scholar
Frigo, M (2000), ‘Peaceful Enjoyment of Possessions, Expropriation and Control of the Use of Property in the System of the European Convention on Human Rights’, 10 Italian Year Book of International Law 45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frowein, JA (1993), ‘The Protection of Property’ in Macdonald, et al. (eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar
Fry, JD (2007), ‘International Human Rights Law in Investment Arbitration: Evidence of International Law’s Unity’, 18 Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 77Google Scholar
Fukunaga, Y (2012), ‘Standard of Review and “Scientific Truths” in the WTO Dispute Settlement System and Investment Arbitration’, 3 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaillard, E (2010), Legal Theory of International Arbitration (Martinus Nijhoff)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaja, G (1992), ‘Positivism and Dualism in Dionisio Anzilotti’, 3 European Journal of International Law 123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallie, WB (1956), ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Harrison & Sons)Google Scholar
Galligan, DJ (2010), ‘Legal Theory and Empirical Research’ in Cane, and Kritzer, (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Gardbaum, S (2009), ‘Human Rights and International Constitutionalism’ in Dunoff, and Trachtman, (eds.), Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law and Global Government (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Garner, JW (1929), ‘The New Arbitration Treaties of the United States’, 23 American Journal of International Law 595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrity-Rokous, G and Brescia, RH (1993), ‘Procedural Justice and International Human Rights: Towards a Procedural Jurisprudence for Human Rights Tribunals’, 18 Yale Journal of International Law 559Google Scholar
Gathii, JT (2009), ‘War’s Legacy in International Investment Law’, 11 International Community Law Review 353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelinas, F (2005), ‘Investment Tribunals and the Commercial Arbitration Model: Mixed Procedures and Creeping Institutionalisation’ in Gehring, and Cordonier, Segger, (eds.), Sustainable Development in World Trade Law (Kluwer Law International)Google Scholar
Gerards, J (2004), ‘Intensity of Judicial Review in Equal Treatment Cases, 51 Netherlands International Law Review 135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerards, J (2009), ‘Judicial Deliberations in the European Court of Human Rights’ in Huls, et al. (eds.), The Legitimacy of Highest Courts’ Rulings (TMC Asser Institute)Google Scholar
Gerards, J (2011), ‘Pluralism, Deference and the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine’, 17 European Law Journal 80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerards, J (2014), ‘Diverging Fundamental Rights Standards and the Role of the European Court of Human Rights’ in Claes, and de Visser, (eds.), Constructing European Constitutional Law (Hart)Google Scholar
Gerards, J (2017), ‘Procedural Review by the ECtHR: A Typology’ in Brems, and Gerards, (eds.), Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerards, J (2018a), ‘The Draft Copenhagen Declaration and the Court’s Dual Role – the Need for a Different Definition of Subsidiarity and the Margin of Appreciation’ Strasbourg ObserversGoogle Scholar
Gerards, J (2018b), ‘Margin of Appreciation and Incrementalism in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights’ 18 Human Rights Law Review 495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerards, J and Senden, H (2009), ‘The Structure of Fundamental Rights and the European Court of Human Rights’, 7 International Journal of Constitutional Law 619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerbic, P and Stacey, E (2005), ‘A Purposive Approach to Content Analysis: Designing Analytical Frameworks’, 8 Internet and Higher Education 45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, VN (2015), ‘An Uncertain Shield – Res Judicata in Arbitration’, 31 Arbitration International 661Google Scholar
Ghouri, A (2014), ‘On Genealogy of Proposals to Reform Investor-State Arbitration’, 11 Transnational Dispute Management 1Google Scholar
Gibson, C (2015), ‘Beyond Self-Judgment: Exceptions Clauses in US BITs’, 1 Fordham International Law Journal 38Google Scholar
Gibson, JL, Caldeira, GA and Baird, V (1998), ‘On the Legitimacy of National High Courts’, 92 American Political Science Review 343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, G (1945), ‘The International Court of Justice’, 55 Yale Law Journal 1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, T (2004), ‘Bounded Discretion in International Judicial Lawmaking’, 45 Virginia Journal of International Law 631Google Scholar
Ginsburg, T (2005), ‘International Substitutes for Domestic Institutions: Bilateral Investment Treaties and Governance’, 25 International Review of Law and Economics 107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, T (2016), ‘The Interaction between Domestic and International Law’ in Kontorovich, and Parisi, (eds.), Economic Analysis of International Law (Edward Elgar)Google Scholar
Giorgetti, C (2013), ‘Is the Truth in the Eyes of the Beholder? The Perils and Benefits of Empirical Research in International Investment Arbitration’, 12 Santa Clara Journal of International Law 263Google Scholar
Giustini, A (1986), ‘Compulsory Adjudication in International Law: The Past, the Present, and Prospects for the Future’, 9 Fordham International Law Journal 213Google Scholar
Glashausser, A (2005), ‘Difference and Deference in Treaty Interpretation’, 50 Villanova Law Review 25Google Scholar
Glenn, HP (1987), ‘Persuasive Authority’, 32 Revue de droit de McGill 261Google Scholar
Goldhaber, M (2016), ‘A Matter of Perspective: Global Governance and the Distinction between Public and Private Authority (and Not Law)’, 5 Global Constitutionalism 48Google Scholar
Goldsmith III, JL and Levinson, D (2009), ‘Law for States: International Law, Constitutional Law, Public Law’ 122(7) Harvard Law Review 1791Google Scholar
Gordillo, LI (2011), Interlocking Constitutions: Towards an Interordinal Theory of National, European and UN Law (Hart)Google Scholar
Graham, DE (1970), ‘The Calvo Clause: Its Current Status as a Contractual Renunciation of Diplomatic Protection’, 6 Texas International Law Forum 289Google Scholar
Grant, JA (2017), ‘Reason and Authority in Administrative Law’, 76 Cambridge Law Journal 507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, K (2015), ‘ICSID’s Reinforcement?: UNASUR and the Rise of a Hybrid Regime for International Investment Arbitration’, 52 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 1115 Google Scholar
Green, A (2010), ‘An Absolute Theory of Convention Rights: Why the ECHR Gives Rise to Legal Rights That Cannot Conflict with Each Other’, 16 UCL Jurisprudence Review 75Google Scholar
Green, L (1988), The Authority of the State (Clarendon)Google Scholar
Greene, RD (1927), ‘The Permanent Court of International Justice’, 7 B.U.L. Review 181Google Scholar
Greene, RD (1931), ‘The Progress of the Permanent Court of International Justice’, 6 St. John’s Law Review 226Google Scholar
Greener, J (2002), ‘Constructive Expropriation and the Framework of Deferential Progressivism’, 25 Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 725Google Scholar
Greer, S (2000), The Margin of Appreciation: Interpretation and Discretion under the European Convention on Human Rights (Council of Europe Publishing)Google Scholar
Greer, S (2004), ‘“Balancing” and the European Court of Human Rights: A Contribution to the Habermas-Alexy Debate’, 63 Cambridge Law Journal 412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greer, S (2010), ‘The Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights: Universal Principle or Margin of Appreciation?’, 3 UCL Human Rights Review 1Google Scholar
Greer, S and Wildhaber, L (2012), ‘Revisiting the Debate about “Constitutionalising” the European Court of Human Rights’, 12 Human Rights Law Review 655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grieves, FL (1969), Supranationalism and International Adjudication (University of Illinois Press)Google Scholar
Griffey, B (2011), ‘The “Reasonableness” Test: Assessing Violations of State Obligations under the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’, 11 Human Rights Law Review 275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grisel, F (2014a), ‘Precedent in Investment Arbitration: The Case of Compound Interest’, 2 Peking University Transnational Law Review 217Google Scholar
Grisel, F (2014b), ‘The Sources of Foreign Investment Law’ in Douglas, et al. (eds.), The Foundations of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Grisel, F (2017), ‘Competition and Cooperation in International Commercial Arbitration: The Birth of a Transnational Legal Profession’, 51 Law & Society Review 790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grisel, F (2020), ‘Marginals and Elites in International Arbitration’ in Schultz, and Ortino, (eds.), Oxford Handbook of International Arbitration (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Gross, O and Ni Aolain, F (2001), ‘From Discretion to Scrutiny: Revisiting the Application of the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Context of Article 15 of the European Convention on Human Rights’, 23 Human Rights Quarterly 652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, N (2009), ‘Legitimacy and International Adjudicative Bodies’. 41 George Washington International Law Review 107Google Scholar
Gruszczynski, L and Vadi, V (2014) ‘Standard of Review and Scientific Evidence in WTO Law and International Investment Arbitration – Converging Parallels?’ in Gruszczynski, and Werner, (eds.), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation (Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruszczynski, L and Werner, W (eds.) (2014), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation (Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillaume, G (1995), ‘The Future of International Judicial Institutions’, 44 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillaume, G (2011), ‘The Use of Precedent by International Judges and Arbitrators’, 2 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, G (2010), Basic Research Methods an Entry to Social Science Research (Sage Publications)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, AT (2008), ‘International Tribunals: A Rational Choice Analysis’, 157 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 171Google Scholar
Guzman, AT and Meyer, T (2008), ‘International Common Law: The Soft Law of International Tribunals’, 9 Chicago Journal of International Law 515Google Scholar
Habermas, J (2015), Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (Polity Press)Google Scholar
Haesler, T (1968), The Exhaustion of Local Remedies in the Case Law of International Courts and Tribunals (AW Sijthoff)Google Scholar
Hall, M and Wright, R (2008), ‘Systematic Content Analysis of Judicial Opinions’, 96 California Law Review 63Google Scholar
Han, SWD (2006), ‘Decentralized Proliferation of International Judicial Bodies’, 16 Journal of Transnational Law and Policy 101Google Scholar
Harbo, T-I (2017), ‘Introducing Procedural Proportionality Review in European Law’, 30 Leiden Journal of International Law 25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, J (1962), ‘The Nationalization of Canadian Property in Cuba under International Law’, 2 Western Law Review 50Google Scholar
Harowitz, P (2008), ‘Three Faces of Deference’, 83 Notre Dame Law Review 1061Google Scholar
Harris, B (2003), ‘Judicial Review, Justiciability and the Prerogative of Mercy’, 62 Cambridge Law Journal 631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, HLA (1994), The Concept of Law (2nd edn, Clarendon)Google Scholar
Hart, Jr HM and Sacks, AM (1994), The Legal Process: Basic Problems in the Making and Application of Law (Foundation Press)Google Scholar
Hathaway, O (2008), ‘International Delegation and State Sovereignty’, 71 Law and Contemporary Problems 115Google Scholar
Hayward, B (2017), Conflict of Law and Arbitral Discretion: The Closest Connection Test (1st edn, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Heise, M, (2000) ‘Preliminary Thoughts on the Virtues of Passive Dialogue’, 34 Akron Law Review 73Google Scholar
Heiskanen, V (1994), ‘Jurisdiction v. Competence: Revisiting a Frequently Neglected Distinction’, 5 Finnish Yearbook of International Law 1Google Scholar
Helfer, L (2003), ‘Constitutional Analogies in the International Legal System’, 37 Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 193Google Scholar
Helfer, L (2008), ‘Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: Embeddedness as a Deep Structural Principle of the European Human Rights Regime’, 19 European Journal of International Law 125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfer, L and Alter, KJ (2009), ‘The Andean Tribunal of Justice and Its Interlocutors: Understanding Preliminary Reference Patterns in the Andean Community’, 41 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 871Google Scholar
Helfer, L and Slaughter, A-M (1997), ‘Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication’, 107 Yale Law Journal 273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henckels, C (2012), ‘Indirect Expropriation and the Right to Regulate: Revisiting Proportionality Analysis and the Standard of Review in Investor-State Arbitration’, 15 Journal of International Economic Law 223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henckels, C (2013), ‘Balancing Investment Protection and the Public Interest: The Role of the Standard of Review and the Importance of Deference in Investor-State Arbitration’, 4 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henckels, C (2014), ‘The Role of the Standard of Review and the Importance of Deference in Investor-State Arbitration’ in Gruszczynski, and Werner, (eds.), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Henckels, C (2015), Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration: Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henkin, L (1990), ‘International Law: Politics, Values and Functions’, in Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, vol. 4 (Brill)Google Scholar
Henrard, K (2012), ‘A Critical Appraisal of the Margin of Appreciation Left to States Pertaining to “Church-State Relations” under the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’ in Vrielink, et al. (eds.), A Test of Faith? Religious Diversity and Accommodation in the European Workplace (Ashgate)Google Scholar
Hepburn, J (2014), ‘Comparative Public Law at the Dawn of Investment Treaty Arbitration: Saar Papier Vertriebs GmbH v. Republic of Poland’, 15 Journal of World Investment & Trade 705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hepburn, J (2016), ‘Applicable Law in TPP Investment Disputes’, 17 Melbourne Journal of International Law 368Google Scholar
Hepburn, J (2017), Domestic Law in International Investment Arbitration (Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heringa, AW (1996), ‘The “Consensus Principle” – The Role of “Common Law” in the ECHR Case Law’, 3 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernández, GI (2014), The International Court of Justice and the Judicial Function (Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershovitz, S (2003), ‘Legitimacy, Democracy, and Razian Authority’ 9 Legal Theory 201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herz, J (1941), ‘Expropriation of Foreign Property’, 35 American Journal of International Law 243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, G (2013), ‘Qualitative Research on Legal Education: Studying Outstanding Law Teachers’, 51 Alberta Law Review 925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hey, E and Mak, E (2009), ‘Introduction: The Possibilities of Comparative Law Methods for Research on the Rule of Law in a Global Context’, 2 Erasmus Law Review 287Google Scholar
Hickman, T (2005), ‘Constitutional Dialogue, Constitutional Theories and the Human Rights Act 1998’, Public Law 306Google Scholar
Higgins, R (1968), ‘Policy Considerations and the International Judicial Process’, 17 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, R (1981), ‘Reality and Hope in International Human Rights: A Critique’, 9 Hofstra Law Review 1485Google Scholar
Higgins, R (1982), ‘The Taking of Property by the State: Recent Developments in International Law’, in Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, vol. 176 (Brill)Google Scholar
Higgins, R (2009), Themes and Theories (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Hill, N (1931), ‘National Judges in the Permanent Court of International Justice’, 25 American Journal of International Law 670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, N (1932), ‘The Extension of the Jurisdiction of the Permanent Court of International Justice by Treaties’, 10 New York University Law Quarterly Review 484Google Scholar
Hilson, C (2013), ‘The Margin of Appreciation, Domestic Irregularity and Domestic Court Rulings in ECHR Environmental Jurisprudence: Global Legal Pluralism in Action’, 2 Global Constitutionalism 262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, M (2005), ‘The Sociology of International Law: Invitation to Study International Rules in Their Social Context’, 55 University of Toronto Law Journal 891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, T (1996), Leviathan (Tuck, R ed., Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Hoexter, C (2000), ‘The Future of Judicial Review in South African Administrative Law’, 117 South African Law Journal 484Google Scholar
Holmes, OW (1991), The Common Law (Dover Publications)Google Scholar
Holstein, J and Gubrium, J (2000), ‘The Constructionist Analytics of Interpretive Practice’ in Denzin, and Lincoln, (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd edn, Sage Publications)Google Scholar
Holtermann, J v. H and Madsen, MR (2016), ‘What Is Empirical in Empirical Studies of Law? A European New Legal Realist Conception’ iCourts Working Paper Series, Paper No. 77Google Scholar
Hovius, B (1985), ‘The Limitation Clauses of the European Convention on Human Rights: A Guide for the Application of Section 1 of the Charter?’, 17 Ottawa Law Review 213Google Scholar
Howell, J (2006), ‘Book Reviews: Property and the Human Rights Act 1998’, 65 Cambridge Law Journal 728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, H-F (2005), ‘Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis’, Qualitative Health Research 1277Google Scholar
Hudson, MO (1928), ‘The World Court: 1922–1928’ World Peace Foundation Pamphlet Series 1Google Scholar
Hudson, MO (1930), ‘The Eighth Year of the Permanent Court of International Justice’, 13 International Conciliation 193Google Scholar
Hudson, MO (1931), ‘The Independence of the Permanent Court of International Justice’, 17 American Bar Association Journal 430Google Scholar
Hudson, MO (1941), ‘The Nineteenth Year of the Permanent Court of International Justice’, 35 American Journal of International Law 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, MO (1945), ‘The Twenty-Third Year of the Permanent Court of International Justice and Its Future’, 39 American Journal of International Law 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, MO (1957), ‘The Succession of the International Court of Justice to the Permanent Court of International Justice’, 51 American Journal of International Law 569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huijbers, L (2017), ‘Procedural-Type Review: A More Neutral Approach to Human Rights Protection by the European Court of Human Rights?’ European Society of International Law, Conference Paper No. 6/2017Google Scholar
Huiping, C (2008), ‘The Investor-State Dispute Settlement Mechanism: Where to Go in the 21st Century?’, 9 Journal of World Investment & Trade 467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, WI (1970), The Two Hague Conferences and Their Contributions to International Law (Kraus)Google Scholar
Hurd, I (1999), ‘Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics’, 53 International Organization 379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurrelmann, A and others (2005), ‘Is There a Legitimation Crisis of the Nation-State?’, 13 European Review 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, CJB (1943), ‘The Permanent Court of International Justice’, 59 Law Quarterly Review 312Google Scholar
Hussain, I (1984), Dissenting and Separate Opinions at the World Court (Martinus Nijhoff)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, CC (1930), ‘The Interpretation of Treaties by the Permanent Court of International Justice’, 24 American Journal of International Law 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ICJ Registry (1976), The International Court of Justice (International Court of Justice)Google Scholar
Iluyomade, BO (1977), ‘Dual Claim and the Exhaustion of Local Remedies Rule in International Law’, 10 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 83Google Scholar
International Institute for Sustainable Development (2017), Exhaustion of Local Remedies in International Investment LawGoogle Scholar
International Law Association (2000), ‘Committee on Diplomatic Protection of Persons and Property’, 69 International Law Association Reports of Conferences 604Google Scholar
International Law Association (2006), ‘Diplomatic Protection of Persons and Property’, 72 International Law Association Reports of Conferences 353Google Scholar
Ishikawa, T (2010), ‘Third Party Participation in Investment Treaty Arbitration’, 59 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isiksel, T (2013), ‘Global Legal Pluralism as Fact and Norm’, 2 Global Constitutionalism 160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jachtenfuchs, M and Krisch, N (2016), ‘Subsidiarity in Global Governance’, Law & Contemporary Problems 79Google Scholar
Jackson, JH (2003), ‘Sovereignty-Modern: A New Approach to an Outdated Concept’, 97 American Journal of International Law 782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, JL (2006), ‘Broniowski v. Poland: A Recipe for Increased Legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights as a Supranational Constitutional Court’, 39 Connecticut Law Review 759Google Scholar
Jacob, M (2011), ‘Precedents: Lawmaking through International Adjudication’, 12 German Law Journal 1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, S (1936), ‘Some Aspects of the Jurisdiction of the Permanent Court of International Justice’, 30 American Journal of International Law 233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, H (1935), ‘The Legal Monism of Alfred Verdross’, 29 American Political Science Review 387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jellinek, G (1968), Die Rechtliche Natur Der Staatenverträge: Ein Beitrag Zur Juristischen Construction Des Völkerrechts (Keip)Google Scholar
Jenks, CW (1938), ‘The Interpretation and Application of Municipal Law by the Permanent Court of International Justice’, 19 British Yearbook of International Law 67Google Scholar
Jenks, CW (1964), The Prospects of International Adjudication (Stevens & Sons Limited)Google Scholar
Jennings, RY (1996), ‘The Judiciary, International and National, and the Development of International Law’, 45 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, RY (1998), ‘The Role of the International Court of Justice’, British Yearbook of International Law 1Google Scholar
Jennings, RY (2002), ‘Sovereignty and International Law’ in Kreijen, et al. (eds.), State, Sovereignty, and International Governance (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Jessup, PC (1956), Transnational Law (Yale University Press)Google Scholar
Jhabvala, F (1978), ‘Declarations by Judges of the International Court of Justice’, 72 American Journal of International Law 830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jimenez de Arechaga, E (1965), ‘Diplomatic Protection of Shareholders in International Law’, 4 Philippine International Law Journal 71Google Scholar
Jimenez de Arechaga, E (1978), ‘International Law in the Past Third of a Century’, in Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, vol. 159 (Brill)Google Scholar
Johns, F (2009), ‘International Legal Theory: Snapshots from a Decade of International Legal Life’, 10 Melbourne Journal of International Law 1Google Scholar
Johnson, OT and Gimblett, J (2011), ‘From Gunboats to BITs: The Evolution of Modern International Investment Law’, Yearbook on International Investment Law and Policy 649Google Scholar
Johnstone, I (1990), ‘Treaty Interpretation: The Authority of Interpretive Communities’, 12 Michigan Journal of International Law 371Google Scholar
Jones, JW (1935), ‘The “Pure” Theory of International Law’, 16 British Yearbook of International Law 5Google Scholar
Jowell, J (2003), ‘Judicial Deference and Human Rights: A Question of Competence’ in Craig, et al. (eds.), Law and Administration in Europe: Essays in Honour of Carol Harlow (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Juss, SS (1994), ‘Nationality Law, Sovereignty, and the Doctrine of Exclusive Domestic Jurisdiction’, 9 Florida Journal of International Law 227Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, J (2005), ‘Unearthing Structural Uncertainty through Neo-Kelsenian Consistency: Conflicts of Norms in International Law’ Papers of the European Society of International LawGoogle Scholar
Kammerhofer, J (2009), ‘Kelsen – Which Kelsen? A Reapplication of the Pure Theory to International Law’, 22 Leiden Journal of International Law 225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanetake, M (2016a), ‘The Interfaces between the National and International Rule of Law: A Framework Paper’ in Kanetake, and Nollkaemper, (eds.), The Rule of Law at the National and International Levels: Contestations and Deference (Hart)Google Scholar
Kanetake, M (2016b), ‘Subsidiarity in the Practice of International Courts’ in Kanetake, and Nollkaemper, (eds.), The Rule of Law at the National and International Levels: Contestations and Deference (Hart)Google Scholar
Kanetake, M and Nollkaemper, A (eds.) (2016), The Rule of Law at the National and International Levels: Contestations and Deference (Hart)Google Scholar
Kanto, M (2017), ‘The Status of Municipal Law before the World Court in the Light of Recent Cases’ in Maluwa, et al. (eds.), The Pursuit of a Brave New World in International Law (Brill)Google Scholar
Kapeliuk, D (2010), ‘The Repeat Appointment Factor: Exploring Decision Patterns of Elite Investment Arbitrators’, 96 Cornell Law Review 47Google Scholar
Katselas, A (2012), ‘Do Investment Treaties Prescribe a Deferential Standard of Review?’, 34 Michigan Journal of International Law 87Google Scholar
Kaushal, A (2009), ‘Revisiting History: How the Past Matters for the Present Backlash Against the Foreign Investment Regime’, 50 Harvard International Law Journal 491Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A (2008), ‘Deference of Defiance?: The Limits of the Judicial Role in Constitutional Adjudication’ in Huscroft, (ed.), Expounding the Constitution: Essays in Constitutional Theory (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A (2014), ‘Proportionality and Parliamentary Debates: Exploring Some Forbidden Territory’, 34 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawano, M (2014), ‘Decisions of the International Court of Justice on Disputes Concerning Internal Law’ in Gaja, and Grote, Stoutenburg, (eds.), Enhancing the Rule of Law through the International Court of Justice (Brill)Google Scholar
Kelsen, H (1943), ‘Compulsory Adjudication of International Disputes’, 37 American Journal of International Law 397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, H (1960), ‘Sovereignty and International Law’, 48 Georgetown Law Journal 627Google Scholar
Kelsen, H (2003), Principles of International Law (Lawbook Exchange)Google Scholar
Kennedy, D (2005), ‘Challenging Expert Rule: The Politics of Global Governance’, 27 Sydney Law Review 5Google Scholar
Keohane, RO, Moravcsik, A and Slaughter, A-M (2003),‘Legalized Dispute Resolution: Interstate and Transnational’ in Keohane, (ed.), Power and Governance in a Partially Globalized World (Routledge)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, DB and Moloo, R (2014), ‘International Arbitrators as Lawmakers’, 46 International Law and Politics 875Google Scholar
King, JA (2008), ‘Institutional Approaches to Judicial Restraint: Judging the Scientific and Medical Literature’, 28 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, JA (2012), Judging Social Rights (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsbury, B (1997), ‘The Concept of Compliance as a Function of Competing Conceptions of International Law’, 19 Michigan Journal of International Law 345Google Scholar
Kingsbury, B (2011), ‘International Courts: Uneven Judicialization in Global Order’ in Crawford, and Koskenniemi, (eds.), Cambridge Companion to International Law (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Kjeldgaard-Pedersen, A (2010), ‘The Evolution of the Right of Individuals to Seise the European Court of Human Rights’, 12 Journal of the History of International Law 267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjeldgaard-Pedersen, A (2014), ‘The Influence of the Concept of International Legal Personality on the Drafting of the PCIJ Statute’, 16 Journal of the History of International Law 9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjos, HE (2013), Applicable Law in Investor-State Arbitration: The Interplay between National and International Law (1st edn, Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjos, HE (2016), ‘Domestic Courts under Scrutiny: The Rule of Law as a Standard (of Deference) in Investor-State Arbitration’ in Kanetake, and Nollkaemper, (eds.), The Rule of Law at the National and International Levels: Contestations and Deference (Hart)Google Scholar
Klabbers, J (2009), ‘The Bridge Crack’d: A Critical Look at Interdisciplinary Relations’, 23 International Relations 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klabbers, J and Piiparinen, T (2013), ‘Normative Pluralism: An Exploration’ in Klabbers, and Piiparinen, (eds.), Normative Pluralism and International Law: Exploring Global Governance (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klabbers, J, Peters, A and Ulfstein, G (2009), The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klager, R (2010), ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Look at the Theoretical Underpinnings of Legitimacy and Fairness’, 11 Journal of World Investment & Trade 435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinlein, T (2011), ‘Judicial Lawmaking by Judicial Restraint? The Potential of Balancing in International Economic Law’, 12 German Law Journal 1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, D (2018), Vigilance and Restraint in the Common Law of Judicial Review (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koessler, M (1947), “Subject”, “Citizen”, “National”, and “Permanent Allegiance”’, 64 South African Law Journal 350Google Scholar
Koh, HH (1996), ‘Transnational Legal Process’, 75 Nebraska Law Review 181Google Scholar
Koh, HH (1997), ‘Why Do Nations Obey International Law?’, 106 Yale Law Journal 2599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koh, HH (2003), ‘On American Exceptionalism’, 55 Stanford Law Review 1479Google Scholar
Kolb, R (2007), ‘German Legal Scholarship as Reflected in Hague Academy Courses on Public International Law’, 50 German Yearbook of International Law 201Google Scholar
Kolb, R (2013), The International Court of Justice (Hart)Google Scholar
Kolb, R (2015), ‘The Jurisprudence of the Permanent Court of International Justice Between Utilitas Publica and Utilitas Singulorum’, 14 Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korowicz, MS (1956), ‘The Problem of the International Personality of Individuals’, 50 American Journal of International Law 533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korzun, V (2017), ‘The Right to Regulate in Investor-State Arbitration: Slicing and Dicing Regulatory Carve-Outs’, 50 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 355Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M (1997), ‘Hierarchy in International Law: A Sketch’, 8 European Journal of International Law 566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, M (2001), The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law, 1870–1960 (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, M (2006), From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, M (2014), ‘What Is International Law For?’ in Evans, (ed.), International Law (Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochvil, J (2011), ‘The Inflation of the Margin of Appreciation by the European Court of Human Rights’, 29 Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, F (1982), ‘On the Notion of “Interest” in International Relations’, 36 International Organization 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriebaum, U (2007), ‘Regulatory Takings: Balancing the Interests of the Investor and the State’, 8 Journal of World Investment & Trade 717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriebaum, U (2014), ‘The Nature of Investment Disciplines’ in Douglas, et al. (eds.), The Foundations of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Krisch, N (2006), ‘Introduction: Global Governance and Global Administrative Law in the International Legal Order’, 17 European Journal of International Law 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krisch, N (2010), Beyond Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krisch, N (2017), ‘Pluralism in International Law and Beyond’ in d’Aspremont, and Singh, (eds.), Fundamental Concepts for International Law: The Construction of a Discipline (Edward Elgar)Google Scholar
Krotoszynski, Jr R (1998) ‘Constitutional Flares: On Judges, Legislatures, and Dialogue’, 83 Minnesota Law Review 1Google Scholar
Krotoszynski, Jr R (2002), ‘Why Deference? Implied Delegations, Agency Expertise, and the Misplaced Legacy of Skidmore’, 54 Administrative Law Review 735Google Scholar
Kulick, A (2010), ‘The Integration of International Investment Law’, 23 Hague Year Book of International Law 171Google Scholar
Kulick, A (2012), Global Public Interest in International Investment Law (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumm, M (2016), ‘Sovereignty and the Right to Be Left Alone: Subsidiarity, Justice-Sensitive Externalities, and the Proper Domain of the Consent Requirement in International Law’, 79 Law and Contemporary Problems 239Google Scholar
Kunz, J (1934), ‘The “Vienna School” and International Law’, 11 New York University Law Quarterly Review 370Google Scholar
Kunz, J (1938), ‘The Theory of International Law’, 32 American Society of International Law Proceedings 23Google Scholar
Kunz, J (1960), ‘The Nottebohm Judgment’, 54 American Journal of International Law 536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuo, M-S (2010), ‘On the Constitutional Question in Global Governance: Global Administrative Law and the Conflicts-Law Approach in Comparison’, 2 Global Constitutionalism 437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurtz, J (2013), ‘Building Legitimacy Through Interpretation in Investor-State Arbitration: On Consistency, Coherence and the Identification of Applicable Law’ in Douglas, et al. (eds.), The Foundations of International Investment Law: Bringing Theory into Practice (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Kurtz, J (2015), ‘Balancing Investor Protection and Regulatory Freedom in International Investment Law: The Necessary, Complex, and Vital Search for State Purpose’ in Bjorklund, (ed.), Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2013–2014 (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Kwiecien, R (2004), ‘In Defence of the Idea of State Sovereignty in International Law’, 27 Polish Yearbook of International Law 87Google Scholar
Kwiecien, R (2011), ‘Sir Hersch Lauterpacht’s Idea of State Sovereignty – Is It Still Alive?’, 13 International Community Law Review 23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwiecien, R (2012), ‘Does the State Still Matter? Sovereignty, Legitimacy and International Law’, 32 Polish Yearbook of International Law 45Google Scholar
Kyriakou, N (2007), ‘Reform of the Reform: The European Court of Human Right’s Endless Quest for Efficient Justice’, 5 Hellenic Review of European Law 385Google Scholar
Lamm, V (2014), Compulsory Jurisdiction in International Law (Edward Elgar)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Land, M (2015), ‘Justice as Legitimacy in the European Court of Human Rights’ in Grant, Cohen, and Grossman, (eds.), Legitimacy and International Courts (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Landes, W and Posner, EA (1976), ‘Legal Precedent: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis’, 19 Journal of Law and Economics 249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langford, M and Behn, D (2017), ‘Managing Backlash: The Evolving Investment Treaty Arbitrator?’, 29(2) European Journal of International Law 551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larouer, CJ (2009), ‘In the Name of Sovereignty? The Battle over In Dubio Mitius Inside and Outside the Courts’ Cornell Law School, Inter-University Graduate Student Conference Papers, Paper No. 22Google Scholar
Larson, A and Jenks, CW (1965), Sovereignty within the Law (Dobbs Ferry)Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, E (1962), ‘The Drafting of Treaties for the Protection of Investment’, 3 International & Comparative Law Quarterly Supplementary Publication 18Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, E (1991), Aspects of the Administration of International Justice (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H (1928), ‘The Doctrine of Non-Justiciable Disputes in International Law’, 24 Economica 277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauterpacht, H (1930), ‘The Absence of an International Legislature and the Compulsory Jurisdiction of International Tribunals’, 11 British Yearbook of International Law 134Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H (1933), The Function of Law in the International Community (Oxford Clarendon)Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H (1946), ‘The Grotian Tradition in International Law’, 23 British Yearbook of International Law 1Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H (1949), ‘Restrictive Interpretation and the Principle of Effectiveness in the Interpretation of Treaties’, 26 British Yearbook of International Law 48Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H (2010), The Development of International Law by the International Court (1st edn, Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Lavranos, N (2008), ‘Towards a Solange-Method between International Courts and Tribunals?’ in Broude, and Shany, (eds.), The Shifting Allocation of Authority in International Law: Considering Sovereignty, Supremacy and Subsidiarity (Hart)Google Scholar
Lazarus, L and Simonsen, N (2015), ‘Judicial Review and Parliamentary Debate: Enriching the Doctrine of Due Deference’ in Hunt, et al. (eds.), Parliaments and Human Rights: Redressing the Democratic Deficit (Hart)Google Scholar
Leech, NL and Onwuegbuzie, AJ (2007), ‘An Array of Qualitative Data Analysis Tools: A Call for Data Analysis Triangulation’, 22 School Psychology Quarterly 557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leech, NL and Onwuegbuzie, AJ (2008), ‘Qualitative Data Analysis: A Compendium of Techniques and a Framework for Selection for School Psychology Research and Beyond’, 23 School Psychology Quarterly 587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legg, A (2012), The Margin of Appreciation in International Human Rights Law: Deference and Proportionality (1st edn, Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legg, A (2016), ‘Human Rights, the Margin of Appreciation, and the International Rule of Law’ in Kanetake, and Nollkaemper, (eds.), The Rule of Law at the National and International Levels: Contestations and Deference (Hart)Google Scholar
Legrand, P (1998), ‘On the Singularity of Law’, 47 Harvard International Law Journal 517Google Scholar
Lehavi, A (2010), ‘The Global Law of the Land’, 81 University of Colorado Law Review 425Google Scholar
Lehavi, A (2015), ‘Unbundling Harmonization: Public versus Private Law Strategies to Globalize Property’, 15 Chicago Journal of International Law 452Google Scholar
Leigh, GIF (1971), ‘Nationality and Diplomatic Protection’, 20 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonhardsen, EM (2012), ‘Looking for Legitimacy: Exploring Proportionality Analysis in Investment Treaty Arbitration’, 3 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonhardsen, EM (2013), ‘Navigating International Waters: Standards of Review in Investment Treaty Arbitration as Adjudicative Response’ SSRNCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonhardsen, EM (2014), ‘Treaty Change, Arbitral Practice and the Search for a Balance: Standards of Review and the Margin of Appreciation in International Investment Law’ in Gruszczynski, and Werner, (eds.), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Letsas, G (2006), ‘Two Concepts of the Margin of Appreciation’, 26 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letsas, G (2007), A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letsas, G (2013), ‘The ECHR as a Living Instrument: Its Meaning and Legitimacy’ in Føllesdal, et al. (eds.), Constituting Europe (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Levit, JK (2005), ‘A Bottom-Up Approach to International Lawmaking: The Tale of Three Trade Finance Instruments’, 30 Yale Journal of International Law 125Google Scholar
Lillich, R and Weston, BH (1988), ‘Lump Sum Agreements: Their Continuing Contribution to the Law of International Claims’, 82 American Journal of International Law 69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, E (2014), ‘Of “Landmark” or “Leading” Cases: Salomon’s Challenge’, 41 Journal of Law and Society 523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lissitzyn, OJ (1951), ‘The International Court of Justice: Its Role in the Maintenance of International Peace and Security’, in United Nations Studies (Carnegie Endowment)Google Scholar
Little, L (2009), ‘Empowerment through Restraint: Reverse Preemption or Hybrid Lawmaking’, 59 Case Western Reserve Law Review 955Google Scholar
Llewelyn, K (1930), ‘A Realistic Jurisprudence – The Next Step’, 30 Columbia Law Review 431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, J (1988), Two Treatises of Government (Laslett, P ed., Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López Escarcena, S (2014), Indirect Expropriation in International Law (Edward Elgar)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lourie, G (2015), ‘Diplomatic Protection under the State-to-State Arbitration Clauses of Investment Treaties’, Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration 511Google Scholar
Lowe, V (1996), ‘Res Judicata and the Rule of Law in International Arbitration’, 8 African Journal of International and Comparative Law 38Google Scholar
Lugato, M (2013), ‘The Margin of Appreciation and Freedom of Religion: Between Treaty Interpretation and Subsidiarity’, 52 Journal of Catholic Legal Studies 49Google Scholar
Madsen, MR (2013), ‘Towards a Sociology of International Courts’ iCourts Working Paper Series, Paper No. 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, MR (2014), ‘The International Judiciary as Transnational Power Elite’, 8 International Political Sociology 332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, MR (2015), ‘The Legitimization Strategies of International Judges’ in Bobek, (ed.), Selecting Europe’s Judges (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Madsen, MR (2016), ‘The Challenging Authority of the European Court of Human Rights: From Cold War Legal Diplomacy to the Brighton Declaration and Backlash’, 79 Law and Contemporary Problems 141Google Scholar
Madsen, MR (2018), ‘Who Rules the World? The Educational Capital of the International Judiciary’ iCourts Working Paper Series, Paper No. 127Google Scholar
Madsen, MR and Dezalay, Y (2002), ‘The Power of the Legal Field: Pierre Bourdieu and the Law’ in Banakar, and Travers, (eds.), An Introduction to Law and Social Theory (Hart)Google Scholar
Maduro, MP (2013), ‘In Search of a Meaning and Not in Search of the Meaning: Judicial Review and the Constitution in Times of Pluralism’, Wisconsin Law Review 541Google Scholar
Magnaye, J and Reinisch, A (2016), ‘Revisiting Res Judicata and Lis Pendens in Investor-State Arbitration’, 15 Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, B (2010), ‘The Greater Good or Property Rights? Resolving the Tension between Positive and Negative Civil Rights in Eminent Domain’, SSRNCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, P (1990), ‘Judicial Activism and Judicial Self-Restraint in the European Court of Human Rights: Two Sides of the Same Coin’, 11 Human Rights Law Journal 5Google Scholar
Makela, F (2013), ‘Acquired Expertise of Administrative Tribunals and the Standard of Judicial Review: The Case of Grievance Arbitrators and Human Rights Law’, 17 Canadian Labour & Employment Law Journal 345Google Scholar
Malintoppi, L (2006), ‘Methods of Dispute Resolution in Inter-State Litigation: When States Go to Arbitration Rather than Adjudication’, 5 Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mamolea, A (2014), ‘Good Faith Review’ in Gruszczynski, and Werner, (eds.), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Mann, FA (1987), ‘The Proper Law in the Conflict of Laws’, 36 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mardikian, L (2018), ‘The Right to Property as Regional Custom in Europe’, 9 Transnational Legal Theory 56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, E (1955), ‘Soviet Views on the Relationship between National and International Law’, 4 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, A (1947), ‘Private Property, Rights, and Interests in the Paris Peace Treaties’, 24 British Yearbook of International Law 273Google Scholar
Martinez-Fraga, P and Reetz, R (2015), Public Purpose in International Law: Rethinking Regulatory Sovereignty in the Global Era (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinkute, I (2016), ‘The Delimitation of Contractual Rights and Property in International Investment Law’, 1 European Investment Law and Arbitration Review Online 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCorquodale, R (2006), ‘International Community and State Sovereignty: An Uneasy Symbiotic Relationship’ in Warbrick, and Tierney, (eds.), Towards an ‘International Legal Community’? The Sovereignty of States and the Sovereignty of International Law (British Institute of International and Comparative Law)Google Scholar
McCorquodale, R (2013), ‘Pluralism, Global Law and Human Rights: Strengthening Corporate Accountability for Human Rights Violations’, 2 Global Constitutionalism 287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrudden, C (2007), ‘Judicial Comparativism and Human Rights’ in Örücü, and Nelken, (eds.), Comparative Law: A Handbook (Hart)Google Scholar
McGoldrick, D (2010), ‘The Boundaries of Justiciability’, 59 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGoldrick, D (2016), ‘A Defence of the Margin of Appreciation and an Argument for Its Application by the Human Rights Committee’, 65 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHarg, A (1999), ‘Reconciling Human Rights and the Public Interest: Conceptual Problems and Doctrinal Uncertainty in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’, 62 Modern Law Review 671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLachlan, C (2005), ‘The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention’, 54 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLachlan, C (2008), ‘Investment Treaties and General International Law’, 57 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLachlan, C (2009), Lis Pendens in International Litigation (Martinus Nijhoff)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McRae, DM (1971), ‘Sovereignty and the International Legal Order’, 10 Western Ontario Law Review 56Google Scholar
Meagher, D (2011), ‘The Brennan Conception of the Implied Freedom: Theory, Proportionality and Deference’, 30 University of Queensland Law Review 119Google Scholar
Melish, T (2009), ‘From Paradox to Subsidiarity: The United States and Human Rights Treaty Bodies’, 34 Yale Journal of International Law 389Google Scholar
Menon, PK (1989), ‘Primary, Subsidiary and Other Possible Sources of International Law’, 1 Sri Lanka Journal of International Law 113Google Scholar
Merges, RP (2011), Justifying Intellectual Property (Harvard University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrills, JG (1969), ‘The Justiciability of International Disputes’, 47 Canadian Bar Review 240Google Scholar
Merrills, JG (1988), The Development of International Law by the European Court of Human Rights (Manchester University Press)Google Scholar
Merry, SE (1988), ‘Legal Pluralism’, 22 Law & Society Review 869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaels, R and Pauwelyn, J (2010), ‘Conflict of Norms or Conflict of Laws? Different Techniques in the Fragmentation of International Law’ in Broude, and Shany, (eds.), Multi-Sourced Equivalent Norms in International Law (Hart)Google Scholar
Mik, C (2014), ‘Book Review: Lukasz Gruscyznski, Wouter Werner (eds.), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation’, 34 Polish Yearbook of International Law 305Google Scholar
Milano, E (2005), ‘Diplomatic Protection and Human Rights before the International Court of Justice: Re-Fashioning Tradition?’ in Curtin, and Nollkaemper, (eds.), Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, vol. 35 (TMC Asser Press)Google Scholar
Miles, K (2010), ‘International Investment Law: Origins, Imperialism and Conceptualizing the Environment’, 21 Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy 1Google Scholar
Miller, N (2002), ‘An International Jurisprudence? The Operation of “Precedent” Across International Tribunals’, 15 Leiden Journal of International Law 483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, D (2014),‘Protocols No. 15 and 16 to the European Convention on Human Rights in the Context of the Perennial Process of Reform’, 17 Zeitschrift für europarechtliche Studien 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, A, Munro, J and Voon, T (2018), ‘Importing WTO General Exceptions into International Investment Agreements: Proportionality, Myths and Risks’, in Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2016–2017 (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Moloo, R and Jacinto, J (2012), ‘Standards of Review and Reviewing Standards: Public Interest Regulation in International Investment Law’, Yearbook of International Law and Policy 539Google Scholar
Montt, S (2012), State Liability in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Global Constitutional and Administrative Law in the BIT Generation (Hart)Google Scholar
Moon, WJ (2012), ‘Essential Security Interests in International Investment Agreements’, 15 Journal of International Economic Law 481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, JB (1922), ‘The Organization of the Permanent Court of International Justice’, 22 Columbia Law Review 497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenthau, H (1940), ‘Positivism, Functionalism, and International Law’, 34 American Journal of International Law 260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosk, RM (2003),‘The Role of Facts in International Dispute Resolution’, in Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, vol. 304 (Hague Academy of International Law)Google Scholar
Mosler, H (1963), ‘The Protection of Human Rights by International Legal Procedure’, 52 Georgetown Law Journal 800Google Scholar
Mountfield, H (2002), ‘Regulatory Expropriations in Europe: The Approach of the European Court of Human Rights’, 11 New York University Environmental Law Journal 136Google Scholar
Mowbray, A (2010), ‘A Study of the Principle of Fair Balance in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’, 10 Human Rights Law Review 289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowbray, A (2015), ‘Subsidiarity and the European Convention on Human Rights’, 15 Human Rights Law Review 313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulhern, JP (1988), ‘In Defense of the Political Question Doctrine’, 137 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullan, DJ (2006), ‘Deference: Is It Useful Outside Canada?’, Acta Juridica 42Google Scholar
Müller, E and Schneider, P (2007), ‘The ICJ 1945–2001: Empirical Findings about its Performance and Recommendations for an Improvement of its Efficiency’, 3 Review of International Law & Politics 71Google Scholar
Mureinik, E (1994), ‘A Bridge to Where? Introducing the Interim Bill of Rights’, 10 South African Journal on Human Rights 31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, S (1991), ‘The ELSI Case: An Investment Dispute at the International Court of Justice’, 16 Yale Journal of International Law 391Google Scholar
Murphy, S (2013), ‘International Judicial Bodies for Resolving Disputes between States’ in Romano, et al. (eds.), Oxford Handbook on International Adjudication (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Nafziger, JAR (1984), ‘Some Remarks on the Writing Style of the International Court of Justice’ in Buergenthal, (ed.), Contemporary Issues in International Law: Essays in Honor of Louis B. Sohn (N P Engel)Google Scholar
Nelken, D (2004), ‘Using the Concept of Legal Culture’, 29 Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 1Google Scholar
Nelken, D (2013), ‘Comparative Sociology of Law’ in Banakar, and Travers, (eds.), Law and Social Theory (2nd edn, Hart)Google Scholar
Newcombe, A (2005), ‘The Boundaries of Regulatory Expropriation in International Law’, 20 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ngulube, P (2015), ‘Qualitative Data Analysis and Interpretation: Systematic Search for Meaning’ in Mathipa, and Gumbo, (eds.), Addressing Research Challenges: Making Headway for Developing Researchers (Mosala-MASEDI Publishers & Booksellers)Google Scholar
Nicholson, F (1965), ‘The Protection of Foreign Property under Customary International Law’, 6 Boston College Industrial and Commercial Law Review 391Google Scholar
Niedlispacher, I (2018), The Developing Remedial Practice of the European Court of Human Rights (Speaking Notes) (Council of Europe)Google Scholar
Niedlispacher, I et al. (2018), The Developing Remedial Practice of the European Court of Human Rights (Handout) (Council of Europe)Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, A (2006), ‘The Role of Domestic Courts in the Case Law of the International Court of Justice’, 5 Chinese Journal of International Law 301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nollkaemper, A (2009), ‘The Reception by the International Court of Justice of Decisions of Domestic Courts’, 7(15)Federalismi.it: Rivista di Diritto Pubblico Italiano 1Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, A (2011), National Courts and the International Rule of Law (Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nollkaemper, A (2013a), ‘Conversations Among Courts: Domestic and International Adjudicators’ in Romano, and Shany, (eds.), Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, A (2013b), ‘Inside or Out’ in Klabbers, and Piiparinen, (eds.), Normative Pluralism and International Law (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Nourse, V and Shaffer, G (2014), ‘Empiricism, Experimentalism, and Conditional Theory’, 67 Southern Methodist University Law Review 141Google Scholar
O’Connell, D (1960), ‘The Relationship between International Law and Municipal Law’, 48 Georgetown Law Journal 431Google Scholar
O’Donnell, T (1982), ‘The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine: Standards in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’, 4 Human Rights Quarterly 474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Donoghue, A (2013), ‘International Constitutionalism and the State’, 11 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oellers-Frahm, K (2001), ‘Multiplication of International Courts and Tribunals and Conflicting Jurisdiction – Problems and Possible Solutions’, 5 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 67Google Scholar
Oesch, M (2003), ‘Standards of Review in WTO Dispute Resolution’, 6 Journal of International Economic Law 635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldfather, C, Bockhorst, J and Dimmer, B (2012), ‘Triangulating Judicial Responsiveness: Automated Content Analysis, Judicial Opinions, and the Methodology of Legal Scholarship’, 64 Florida Law Review 1189Google Scholar
Olivier, M (1988), ‘Aspects of the Establishment of Sovereignty and the Transfer of Government Authority’, 14 African Year Book of International Law 85Google Scholar
Olynyk, S (2012), ‘A Balanced Approach to Distinguishing between Legitimate Regulation and Indirect Expropriation in Investor-State Arbitration’, 15 International Trade & Business Law Review 254Google Scholar
Oppenheim, L (1908), ‘The Science of International Law: Its Task and Method’, 2 American Journal of International Law 313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheim, L, Jennings, RY and Watts, A (1996)Oppenheim’s International Law: Volume 1, Peace (9th edn, Longman)Google Scholar
Orakhelashvili, A (2003), ‘Restrictive Interpretation of Human Rights Treaties in Recent Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’, 14 European Journal of International Law 529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orakhelashvili, A (2008), The Interpretation of Acts and Rules in Public International Law (Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Origgi, G (2018), Reputation: What it Is and Why it Matters (Princeton University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortino, F (2005), ‘From “Non-Discrimination” to “Reasonableness”: A Paradigm Shift in International Economic Law?’ Jean Monnet Working Paper No. 01/05Google Scholar
Ortino, F (2014), ‘The Investment Treaty System as Judicial Review’ Dickson Poon School of Law Research Paper No. 2014–23Google Scholar
Ortino, F (2017), ‘Investment Treaties, Sustainable Development and Reasonableness Review: A Case Against Strict Proportionality Balancing’, 30 Leiden Journal of International Law 71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrovsky, A (2005), ‘What’s So Funny about Peace, Love, and Understanding? How the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine Preserves Core Human Rights within Cultural Diversity and Legitimises International Human Rights Tribunals’, 1 Hanse Law Review 47Google Scholar
Owen, H (1968), ‘Compulsory Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice: A Study of Its Acceptance by Nations’, 3 Georgia Law Review 704Google Scholar
Paine, J (2015), ‘The Project of System-Internal Reform in International Investment Law: An Appraisal’, Journal of International Dispute Settlement 1Google Scholar
Paine, J (2019), ‘Standard of Review (Investment Arbitration)’ in Ruiz-Fabri, (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Procedural Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Pandya, APG and Moody, A (2010), ‘Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Arbitration: An Unclear Future’, 15 Tilburg Law Review 93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paparinskis, M (2014), ‘Analogies and Other Regimes of International Law’ in Douglas, et al. (eds.), The Foundations of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Pappas, M (2008), ‘No Two-Stepping in the Laboratories: State Deference Standards and Their Implications for Improving the Chevron Doctrine’, 39 McGeorge Law Review 977Google Scholar
Parker, D (2013), ‘Policing Procedure before Substance: Reforming Judicial Review of the Factual Predicates to Legislation’, 99 Virginia Law Review 1327Google Scholar
Parlett, K (2011), The Individual in the International Legal System (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Paul, JR (1991), ‘Comity in International Law’, 32 Harvard International Law Journal 1Google Scholar
Paulsson, J (2005), Denial of Justice in International Law (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, J (2014), ‘At the Edge of Chaos? Foreign Investment Law as a Complex Adaptive System, How It Emerged and How It Can Be Reformed’, 29 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, J and Elsig, M (2012), ‘The Politics of Treaty Interpretation: Variations and Explanations across International Tribunals’ in Dunoff, and Pollack, (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, J and Salles, LE (2009), ‘Forum Shopping before International Tribunals: (Real) Concerns, (Im)Possible Solutions’, 42 Cornell International Law Journal 77Google Scholar