Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-8r8mm Total loading time: 0.362 Render date: 2021-12-07T22:29:44.294Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

4 - Judicial appointments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Shimon Shetreet
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Sophie Turenne
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Introduction

4.1 In any system, the methods of appointment have direct bearing on both the integrity and independence of the judges. Weak appointments lower the status of the judiciary in the eyes of the public and create a climate in which the necessary independence of the judiciary is liable to be undermined. Similarly, political appointments that are seen by the public as not based on merit may arouse concern about the judge’s independence and impartiality on the bench. The quality of judicial appointments depends upon the process and standards applied by the appointing authorities, yet every appointment system has its limitations. It is difficult to predict what sort of judge a man or a woman will be and irreversible mistakes in judicial appointments are bound to occur, even when the method of appointment is fair and efficient and the standards are high, as they are in England. Such errors in selection apply equally to appointing persons who were unfit for occupying a judicial office as well as failing to appoint a person who might have been a good judge.

In this chapter, we consider the principles which shape the selection process and criteria. Professional competence and integrity are a universal requirement for appointment to the bench, and are encompassed in the English requirement of ‘merit and good character’. This requirement is underpinned, however, by the principles of transparency, independence from politics, a concern for a fair reflection of society in the appointment process and proper judicial accountability. Transparency, in particular, supports the prioritisation of merit and a fairer reflection of society. In England, the lack of diversity in the composition of the judiciary is noticeable at the level of the High Court and above, and the policies adopted to encourage diversity within the judiciary (from the ‘trickle up’ policy to the ‘need to have regard to diversity’) should not compromise the requirement of merit for judicial appointment. The Judicial Appointments Commission, which now recommends all appointments to the Lord Chancellor, can only have regard to the need to encourage diversity in the pool of applicants. This duty aims to address the persistent criticism of the judiciary that the judges have been white, male and upper middle class, privately educated Oxbridge graduates and barristers.

Type
Chapter
Information
Judges on Trial
The Independence and Accountability of the English Judiciary
, pp. 102 - 178
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bell, J., Judiciaries within Europe, A Comparative Review (Cambridge University Press, 2006) 314.Google Scholar
Clarke, , ‘Selecting Judges: Merit, Moral Courage, Judgment and Diversity’ (2009) 5 High Court Quarterly Review49.Google Scholar
Stevens, R., The English Judges: Their Role in the Changing Constitution, rev. edn (Oxford: Hart, 2005), pp. 12–21.Google Scholar
Edwards, J.L.J., The Law Officers of the Crown: a Study of the Offices of Attorney-General and Solicitor-General with an Account of the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions of England (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1964), ch. 15Google Scholar
Toulson, LJ, ‘Judging Judicial Appointments’, Pilgrim Fathers Lecture, Plymouth (3 December 2009), p. 9.
Heuston, R.F.V., Lives of the Lord Chancellors (1885–1940) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1964), xxi.Google Scholar
Coldstream, G., ‘Judicial Appointment in England’ (1959) 43 Journal of the American Judicial Society, 41, 44.Google Scholar
Birkenhead, , The Life of F.E Smith, First Earl of Birkenhead (London: Eyre & Spottiswoode, 1960), 332.Google Scholar
Erskine, M, ‘The Selection of Judges in England: A Standard for Comparison’ (1953) 39 American Bar Association Journal279.Google Scholar
Griffith, J.A.G., The Politics of the Judiciary, 5th edn (London: Fontana, 1997), pp. 18–22.Google Scholar
Shetreet, S., ‘The Normative Cycle of Shaping Judicial Independence in Domestic and International Law: The Mutual Impact of National and International Jurisprudence and Contemporary Practical and Conceptual Challenges’ (2009) 10 U Chi JIL 275.
McGlynn, C., ‘The Status of Women Lawyers in the United Kingdom’, in Schultz, U. and Shaw, G. (eds.), Women in the Worlds’ Legal Professions (Oxford: Hart, 2003), ch. 9.Google Scholar
Malleson, K.E., ‘Modernising the Constitution: Completing the Unfinished Business’ (2004) 24 LS 119, 120.
Malleson, K.E, ‘Rethinking the Merit Principle in the Judicial Appointments Process’ (2006) Journal of Law and Society 126
Gibbs, F., ‘Top Judge Could Be a Woman as Decision Goes to Lay Majority’, The Times, 12 March 2013.
Malleson, K.E., The Legal System, 3rd edn (Oxford University Press, 2007), p. 212.Google Scholar
Straw, Jack, ‘Judicial Appointments’, Hamlyn Lecture, Inner Temple (4 December 2012).
Hazell, R., ‘Britain’s Constitutional Reforms: Trivial or Transforming?’, Transcript of Anthony Simpson Memorial Lecture (2009)
Paterson, A. and Paterson, C., ‘Guarding the Guardians? Towards an Independent, Accountable and Diverse Senior Judiciary’ (London: CentreForum, 2012), p. 28.
Cecil, H., The English Judge (London: Stevens and Sons, 1970).Google Scholar
Evans, S. and Williams, J., ‘Appointing Australian Judges: A New Model’ (2008) 30(2) Sydney Law Review295, 295–7.Google Scholar
Bailey, S.H., Smith, Bailey and Gunn on the Modern English Legal System (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2007), paras. 4.023 and 4.029.Google Scholar
Malleson, K., The New Judiciary (Aldershot: Ashgate Press, 1999), p. 111.Google Scholar
Dobbs, J, ‘Diversity in the Judiciary’, Lecture at Queen Mary University of London (17 October 2007).
Minow, M., ‘Stripped Down Like a Runner or Enriched by Experience: Bias and Impartiality of Judges and Jurors’ (1992) 33 William and Mary Law Review1201.Google Scholar
Abel-Smith, B. and Stevens, R., Lawyers and the Courts. A Sociological Study of the English Legal System, 1750–1965 (London: Heinemann Educational Books, 1967).Google Scholar
Pannick, D., ‘Why the Silk’s Purse Won’t Survive’ [2001] PL 439.
Blom-Cooper, L., ‘The Judiciary in an Era of Law Reform’ (1966) 37 Political Quarterly378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abel Smith, B. and Stevens, R., In Search of Justice (London: Allen Lane, 1968), p. 190.Google Scholar
Gardiner, , ‘Two Lawyers or One?’ (1970) 23 CLP 1, 19
Zander, M., ‘Book Review’, 35 MLR 104, 105 (1972)
Goodman, , Hansard, HL, vol. 288, col. 616 (29 January 1968).
de Smith, S.A., Constitutional and Administrative Law (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1971), 369.Google Scholar
Shiels, R. S., ‘Professional Conduct and the Solicitor Advocate’ (2009) Criminal Law Review, 794.
Gibb, F., ‘Lord Judge: Recession could Harm Judicial Diversity’, The Times (12 March 2009)
Berlins, M. and Dyer, C., The Law Machine (London: Penguin, 2000), p. 71.Google Scholar
Taylor, , ‘The Judiciary in the Nineties’, The Richard Dimbleby Lecture (30 November 1992)
Barmes, L. and Malleson, K., ‘The Legal Profession as Gatekeeper to the Judiciary: Design Faults in Measures to Enhance Diversity’ (2011) 74 MLR 245.
Healy, G., Kirton, G., Ozbilgin, M., Calveley, M., Forson, C., Oikelome, F. and Tatli, A., Assessment Centres for Judicial Appointments and Diversity (Research Report for the Department of Constitutional Affairs, 2006)Google Scholar
Thomas, C., Judicial Diversity and the Appointment of Deputy District Judges (London: CJA, 2006).Google Scholar
Kennedy, H., Eve Was Framed: Women and British Justice (London: Vintage, 1993, revised edn 2005)Google Scholar
Hazell, R., The Bar on Trial (London: Quartet, 1978)Google Scholar
Brown, M. (1972) 116 Solicitors’ Journal81–2
Hale, B., ‘Equality and the Judiciary: Why Should We Want More Women Judges?’ [2001] PL 489
Malleson, K., ‘Judicial Training and Performance Appraisal: The Problem of Judicial Independence’ (1997) 60 MLR 655.
Blom-Cooper, L., ‘The Age of Judicial Responsibility: The Retirement and Resignation of Appellate Court Judges’, in Shetreet, S. and Forsyth, C. (eds.), The Culture of Judicial Independence: Conceptual Foundations and Practical Challenges (Leiden: M. Njihof, 2012).Google Scholar
Di Frederico, G. (ed.), Recruitment, Professional Evaluation and Career of Judges and Prosecutors in Europe (Bologna; IRSIG-CNR, 2005)Google Scholar
Bell, J., ‘Memorandum’, in Select Committee on Constitutional Reform Bill, ‘First Report. Written Evidence’, vol. II, HC 125-II (24 June 2004)
Kommers, D.P., ‘The German Judiciary’, In Russell, P.H. and O’Brien, D.M. (eds), Judicial Independence in the Age of Democracy (Charlottesville/London: University of Georgia, 2001) p. 131.Google Scholar
du Bois, F., ‘Judicial Selection in Post-Apartheid South Africa’, in Malleson, K. and Russell, P. H. (eds.), Appointing Judges in an Age of Judicial Power. Critical Perspectives from Around the World (University of Toronto Press, 2006), p. 281.Google Scholar
Hunter, R., McGlynn, C. and Rackley, E., Feminist Judgments: From Theory to Practice (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010)Google Scholar
Rackley, E., Women, Judging and the Judiciary. From Difference to Diversity (London: Routledge-Cavendish, 2012)Google Scholar
Smith, R., ‘Judging the Judges’ (2009) 159 NLJ 1154
Soeharno, J.E., ‘From Rechtsstaat to Ruler in the Rule of Law: an Inquiry into the Increased Role of the Judiciary’, in van Hoek, A. et al. (eds.) Multilevel Governance in Enforcement and Adjudication (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2006), p. 157.Google Scholar
Shetreet, S., ‘On Assessing the Role of Courts in Society’ (1980) 10 Manitoba Law Journal355, 399–402.Google Scholar
Mahoney, P., ‘The International Judiciary: Independence and Accountability’ (2008) 7 The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz-Fabri, H. and Sorel, J.-M. (eds), Indépendence et impartialité des juges internationaux (Paris: Pédone, 2010)Google Scholar
Mackenzie, R et al (eds), Selecting International Judges: Principles, Process, and Politics (Oxford University Press, 2010) 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burley, A.-M. and Mattli, W., ‘Europe before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration’ (1993) 47 International Organization41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mance, , ‘The Common Law and Europe: Differences of Style Or Substance and Do They Matter?’, Presidential Address to the Holdsworth Club of the University of Birmingham, 26 November 2006, p. 10.
Mance, , ‘The Composition of the European Court of Justice’, talk given to the UK Association for European Law, 19 October 2011, p. 8.
Limbach, J. et al., Judicial Independence: Law and Practice of Appointments to the European Court of Human Rights (London, Interights, 2003).Google Scholar
Bruinsma‚, F. ‘A Socio-Legal Analysis of the Legitimacy of Highest Courts’, in Huls, N., Adams, M. and Bomhoff, J. (eds), The Legitimacy of Highest Courts’ Ruling. Judicial Deliberations and Beyond (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2009) 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voeten, E., ‘The Politics of International Judicial Appointments. Evidence from the Court of Human Rights’ (2007) 61 International Organization, 669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, R., The Independence of the Judiciary. The View from the Lord Chancellor’s Office (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993), p. 134.Google Scholar
Beloff, M., ‘Paying Judges: Who, Whom, Why, How Much?’(2006) 18 Denning Law Journal1, 24.Google Scholar
Spencer, J.R., Jackson’s Machinery of Justice, 8th edn (Cambridge University Press, 1989), p. 274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shetreet, S. and Deschenes, J. (eds.), Judicial Independence: The Contemporary Debate (Leiden: M. Nijhoff, 1985), p. 672.Google Scholar
Dodek, A. and Sossin, L. (eds.), Judicial Independence in Context (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2010), pp. 25–93.Google Scholar
Abel-Smith, B. and Stevens, R., Lawyers and the Courts (London: Heineman, 1967), p. 127.Google Scholar
Holdsworth, W., ‘Constitutional Position of the Judges’ (1932) 48 LQR 25
Shetreet, S., Justice in Israel: A Study of the Israeli Judiciary (Leiden: M. Nijhoff, 1994), pp. 160–1.Google Scholar
Wallace, J.C., ‘Resolving Judicial Corruption’, in Das, C. and Chandra, K. (eds.), Judges and Judicial Accountability (Delhi: Universal Law Publishing Company, 2003), pp. 86–101.Google Scholar
Genn, H., ‘The Attractiveness of Senior Judicial Appointment to Highly Qualified Practitioners’, Report to the Judicial Executive Board of England and Wales (December 2008), pp. 11, 18–19.
Rozenberg, Joshua wrote in 1994 that ‘The real problem is not that judges earn too little but that lawyers earn too much’, The Search for Justice (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1995), p. 92.Google Scholar
Pannick, D., Judges (Oxford University Press, 1987), p. 20Google Scholar
Bristow, Peter, writing in a memoir (Judge for Yourself (London: Kimber, 1986), p. 25Google Scholar
Gibbs, F., ‘Judges Threaten to Resign over Pension Losses’, The Times, 6 October 2005

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×