Immunity, discipline and removal of judges

Shimon Shetreet; Sophie Turenne

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139005111.008

Home
Books
Judges on Trial
Immunity, discipline and removal of judges

7 - Immunity, discipline and removal of judges

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2014

Shimon Shetreet and

Sophie Turenne

Show author details

Shimon Shetreet: Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Sophie Turenne: Affiliation:
University of Cambridge

Chapter

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

7.1 We saw in Chapters 5 and 6 how standards of judicial conduct are now expressly construed as a defining component of public trust in the judiciary. In this chapter we focus upon the process of regulation of judicial conduct. While tenure of judicial office is a fundamental element of judicial independence, disciplinary procedures apply to judges who misbehave in one way or another, albeit that few judges have had charges brought against them. The power to remove and discipline judges directly affects individual judges as well as the judiciary as a whole, thus the grounds and mechanisms for the discipline and removal of judges are of vital importance to the independence of the judiciary. They must be subject to proper safeguards, and their analysis forms the major part of this chapter. Little has been written in recent times about removal and discipline of English judges, no doubt because of the proud record of English judges with regard to their professional behaviour. The separation of powers enshrined in the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 (CRA) invites a renewed scrutiny, however, of the role played by the executive and the legislature in the exercise of the powers of discipline and removal of judges. Until the CRA, the power to discipline was in the hands of the Lord Chancellor, also the head of the judiciary. Following the transfer of the latter responsibility to the Lord Chief Justice in 2005, the power to discipline judges is now shared between the Lord Chief Justice and the Lord Chancellor, placing safeguards upon its use. In addition to disciplinary actions, the procedures of impeachment and address of removal, which can lead to the vacation of senior judicial office, are also considered.

Type: Chapter
Information: Judges on Trial
The Independence and Accountability of the English Judiciary
, pp. 272 - 356

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139005111.008[Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Purchase

Buy Book

Buy print or eBook

References

Pannick, D., Judges (Oxford University Press, 1987)Google Scholar

Holdsworth, W., ‘Constitutional Position of the Judges’ (1932) 48 LQR 25 26–8

Diplock, in Chokolingo v. A.-G. of Trinidad and Tobago [1981] 1 WLR 106, 107

Olowofoyeku, A.A., Suing Judges: A Study of Judicial Immunity (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993), pp. 20–1.Google Scholar

Nicol, A., ‘Judicial Immunity and Human Rights’ (2006) 5 EHRLR 558, 563–4

Olowofoyeku, A.A., ‘State Liability for the Exercise of Judicial Power’ [1998] PL 444, 460–1

Beatson, J. et al., Human Rights: Judicial Protection in the United Kingdom (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2008), paras. 7-169–72Google Scholar

Stevens, R., The English Judge (Oxford University Press, 2002), 166Google Scholar

Coke, E., Institutes of the Laws of England (W. Clarke & Sons, London, last edn, 1824), vol. I, p. 42Google Scholar

Chitty, J., A Treatise on the Law of the Prerogatives of the Crown; and the Relative Duties and Rights of the Subject (London: J. Butterworth and Son, 1820)Google Scholar

Blackstone, W., Commentaries on the Laws of England (1765), vol. II, book 4, ch. 18.

Hawkins, W., A Treatise of the Pleas of the Crown, 6th edn (London: Leach, 1787), ch. 66, p. 310Google Scholar

Anson, T.R.S., The Law and Custom of the Constitution, 3rd edn (Oxford: Clarendon, 1907), vol. I, 222–3Google Scholar

Comyns, J., A Digest of the Laws of England, 5th edn (London: J. Butterworth and Son, 1822), pp. 210–11Google Scholar

Bell, J., Judiciaries within Europe, A Comparative Review (Cambridge University Press, 2006), p. 323Google Scholar

Wood, D., ‘Judicial Ethics. A Discussion Paper’ (Melbourne: AIJA, 1996), p. 15

Turenne, S., ‘Judicial Misconduct and Disciplinary Procedures – a Brave New World’ (2012) 23 European Law Business Review107Google Scholar

Robertson, G.S., The Law and Practice of Civil Proceedings By and Against the Crown and Departments of the Government (London: Stevens & Sons, 1908), p. 537Google Scholar

Viner, C., A General Abridgement of Law and Equity, 2nd edn 30 vols., with 7 vol. Supplement (London: G.G.J. and J. Robinson, 1792–1795), vol. 19Google Scholar

Short, P.H. and Mellor, F.H., Practice on the Crown Side of the Queen's Bench Division of Her Majesty's High Court of Justice, Founded on Corner's Crown Office Practice. Including Appeals from Inferior Courts. With Appendices of Rules and Forms, 2nd edn (London: Stevens & Haynes, 1908)Google Scholar

McIlwain, C.H., ‘The Tenure of English Judges’ (1913) 7 Am Pol Sci Rev 217, pp. 221, 223

de Smith, A, ‘The Prerogative Writs’ (1951) CLJ 40, 41

Williams, G.L., Crown Proceedings: an Account of Civil Proceedings by and against the Crown as Affected by the Crown Proceedings Act, 1947 (London: Stevens, 1948), p. 114Google Scholar

Comyns, , Laws of England, vol. V, 215; Kenrick's Case II (1826) 14 Parl. Deb. 2nd Ser., 660

Hallam, H., The Constitutional History of England from the Accession of Henry VII to the Death of George II, 5th edn (London: John Murray, 1846), vol. II, pp. 357–8Google Scholar

Maitland, F.W., The Constitutional History of England: a Course of Lectures (Cambridge University Press, 1908), p. 313Google Scholar

Shortt, J., Informations (Criminal and Quo Warranto) Mandamus and Prohibition (London: W. Clowes & Sons, 1887), p. 24Google Scholar

May, Erskine, Parliamentary Practice, 8th edn (1879), 681

May, Erskine, Parliamentary Practice, 7th edn (1964), 39

May, Erskine, Parliamentary Practice, 8th edn (1879), 681

Pengelly, Serjeant's Speech, Trial of the Earl of Macclesfield, T.B. Howell, A Complete Collection of State Trials (London: Hansard, Bagshaw, 1809–16), vol. XVIGoogle Scholar

Hatsell, J., Precedents of Proceedings in the House of Commons, with Observations (London: Printed for L. Hansard and Sons, 1818)Google Scholar

Berger, R., ‘Impeachment for “High Crimes and Misdemeanors”’ (1971) 44 Southern California Law Review 395, 400–15Google Scholar

May, Erskine, Parliamentary Practice, 8th edn (1879), 681–3

Black, C.L., Impeachment: A Handbook (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974Google Scholar

May, Erskine, Parliamentary Practice, 8th edn (1879), 684

May, Erskine, Parliamentary Practice, 8th edn (1879), 681, 685–6

May, Erskine, Parliamentary Practice, 8th edn (1879), 684

Berger, R., ‘Impeachment of Judges and “Good Behavior” Tenure’ (1970) 79 Yale Law Journal 1475, 1518–19CrossRef Google Scholar

Gibb, A.D., Judicial Corruption in the United Kingdom (Edinburgh: Green & Son, 1957)Google Scholar

Campbell, J., Lives of the Chief Justices (London: John Murray, 1849), 509–10Google Scholar

Gower, L.C.B., ‘A South Sea Heresy?’ (1952) 68 LQR 214; Foss, Judges of England, vol. VIII, 2–3

Jeafferson, J.C., A Book About Lawyers (London: Hurst and Blackett, 1867), vol. I, p. 256Google Scholar

Denning, A., The Road to Justice (London: Stevens, 1955), 20–2Google Scholar

Russell, John in Kenrick's Case (1826) 14 Parl. Deb., 3rd Ser., 367

Wooddeson, L.R., Elements of Jurisprudence Treated of in the Preliminary Part of a Course of Lectures on the Laws of England (Dublin: printed by H. Fitzpatrick for J. Moore, 1792), pp. 88Google Scholar

Curtis, G.T., History of the Origin, Formation and Adoption of the Constitution of the United States (New York: Harper, 1860), vol. II, p. 69Google Scholar

Hearn, W.E., The Government of England: its Structure and its Development, 2nd edn (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1886), 87Google Scholar

Birkenhead, , The Life of F.E. Smith, First Earl of Birkenhead (London: Eyre & Spottiswoode, 1960), p. 403Google Scholar

Denning, A., The Changing Law (London: Stevens, 1953), 5Google Scholar

Brougham, , The British Constitution: Its History, Structure and Working (London: Richard Griffin & Co., 1861)Google Scholar

Dicey, , Law of the Constitution, 10th edn (London: Macmillan, 1959), 132Google Scholar

Cecil, , Hansard, HL, vol. 95, cols. 124 and 127 (28 November 1934)

Sankey, , Hansard, HL, vol. 90, col. 124 (23 November 1933)

Cecil, , Hansard, HL, vol. 90, cols. 73, 84–5 (23 November 1933)

Rankeillour, , Hansard, HL, vol. 90, col. 101 (23 November 1933)

Marshall, G., Constitutional Conventions: the Rules and Forms of Political Accountability (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984)Google Scholar

Jennings, I., The Law and the Constitution, 5th edn (London: University of London Press, 1959)Google Scholar

de Smith, S.A., Constitutional and Administrative Law (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1971), 374Google Scholar

Ridges, E.W., Constitutional Law, 8th edn, ed. Forrest, G.A. (London: Stevens and Sons, 1950), 336Google Scholar

Hearn, , Government of England, 84: ‘the Crown is not bound to act upon that address’; contra Bagehot: ‘the sovereign . . . has three rights . . . the right to be consulted, the right to encourage, the right to warn’, The English Constitution (London: C.A. Watts, 1964)Google Scholar

Wade, E.S.C and Phillips, G., Constitutional Law. An Outline of the Law and Practice of the Constitution Including Central and Local Government and the Constitutional Relations of the British Commonwealth and Empire, 4th edn, ed Wade, E.C.S. (London: Longmans, Green and Co, 1950), p. 663Google Scholar

Barrington, Jonah, (1828) 2 Mirror of Parliament, 1577

Gordon, R. and Street, Amy, ‘Select Committees and Coercive Powers – Clarity or Confusion?’ (London: Constitution Society, 2012)

Scarlett, James (later Lord Abinger); Smith's Case (1834) 21 Parl. Deb., 3rd Ser., 518

Shortt, J., Informations (Criminal and Quo Warranto) Mandamus, and Prohibition (London: W. Clowes and Sons, 1887), pp. 26–9Google Scholar

Nash, T.A., The Life of Richard, Lord Westbury, Formerly Lord High Chancellor, with Selections from his Correspondence (London: R. Bentley and Sons, 1888)Google Scholar

Atlay, J.B., The Victorian Chancellors (London: Smith Elder, 1906–1908)Google Scholar

Pollock, G., Mr Justice McCardie: A Biography (London: John Lane, 1934), 132–9Google Scholar

Drewry, G., ‘The Privilege of Parliament’ (1974) 124 New Law Journal489Google Scholar

National Commission on Judicial Discipline and Removal, Report (Washington: West Company Publishing, 1993), 152 FRD265, pp. 291–2Google Scholar