Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-8bbf57454-k9dpc Total loading time: 2.631 Render date: 2022-01-26T05:26:06.198Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2015

Simon J. Joseph
Affiliation:
California Lutheran University
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Jesus and the Temple
The Crucifixion in its Jewish Context
, pp. 245 - 298
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahams, Israel 1917. Studies in Pharisaism and the Gospels. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Adams, Rebecca 2000. “Loving Mimesis and Girard’s “Scapegoat of the Text”: A Creative Reassessment of Mimetic Desire,” in Willar, M. Swartley (ed.), Violence Renounced: René Girard, Biblical Studies, and Peacemaking. Studies in Peace and Scripture 4. Telford: Pandora Press, 277307.Google Scholar
Ådna, Jostein 1999. “Jesus’ Symbolic Act in the Temple (Mark 11:15–17): The Replacement of the Sacrificial Cult by his Atoning Death,” in Ego, B., Lange, A., and Pilhofer, P. (eds.), Gemeinde ohne Tempel: Zur Substituierung und Transformation des Jerusalemer Tempels und seines Kults im Alten Testament, antiken Judentum und frühen Christentum. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 118. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 461475.Google Scholar
Ådna, Jostein 2000. Jesu Stellung zum Tempel: die Tempelaktion und das Tempelwort als Ausdruck seiner messianischen Sendung. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament II.119. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Ådna, Jostein 2011. “Jesus and the Temple,” in Holmén, Tom (ed.), Handbook for the Study of the Historical Jesus. 4 vols. Leiden: Brill, 3: 26352675.Google Scholar
Aitken, Ellen Bradshaw 2004. Jesus’ Death in Early Christian Memory: The Poetics of the Passion. Novum Testamentum et orbis antiquus / Studien zur Umwelt des Neuen Testaments 53. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akers, Keith 2000. The Lost Religion of Jesus: Simple Living and Nonviolence in Early Christianity. New York: Lantern Books.Google Scholar
Alexander, T. Desmond 2008. From Eden to the New Jerusalem: An Introduction to Biblical Theology. Grand Rapids: Kregel.Google Scholar
Alexander, T. Desmond and Gathercole, S. (eds.) 2004. Heaven on Earth: The Temple in Biblical Theology. Carlisle: Paternoster.Google Scholar
Alexander, Philip S. 1988. “Jewish Law in the Time of Jesus: Towards a Clarification of the Problem,” in Lindars, B. (ed.), Law and Religion: Essays on the Place of the Law in Israel and Early Christianity. Cambridge: James Clarke & Co., 4458.Google Scholar
Alexander, Philip S. 2007. “Jewish Believers in Early Rabbinic Literature (2nd to 5th Centuries),” in Skarsaune, Oskar and Hvalvik, Reidar (eds.), Jewish Believers in Jesus: The Early Centuries. Peabody: Hendrickson, 659709.Google Scholar
Alexis-Baker, Andy 2012. “Violence, Nonviolence and the Temple Incident in John 2:13–15,” Biblical Interpretation 20: 7396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Dale C. 1987. “Jesus and the Covenant: A Response to E.P. Sanders,” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 29: 5778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Dale C. 1997. The Jesus Tradition in Q. Harrisburg: Trinity Press International.Google Scholar
Allison, Dale C. 1999. Jesus of Nazareth: Millenarian Prophet. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
Allison, Dale C. 2000. The Intertextual Jesus: Scripture in Q. Harrisburg: InterVarsity.Google Scholar
Allison, Dale C. 2001. “Q’s New Exodus and the Historical Jesus,” in Lindemann, A. (ed.), The Sayings Source Q and the Historical Jesus. Bibliotheca ephemeridum theologicarum lovaniensium 158. Leuven: Peeters, 395428.Google Scholar
Allison, Dale C. 2002. “John and Jesus: Continuity and Discontinuity,” Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus 1.1, 6-27.
Allison, Dale C. 2005. Resurrecting Jesus: The Earliest Christian Tradition and Its Interpreters. New York: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Allison, Dale C. 2010. Constructing Jesus: Memory, Imagination, and History. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.
Alobaidi, Joseph (ed.) 1998. The Messiah in Isaiah 53: The Commentaries of Saadia Gaon, Salmon ben Yeruham, and Yefer ben Eli on Isaiah 52:13–53:12. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Amphoux, C-B. 1995. “L’Évangile selon les Hébreux: Source de L’Évangile de Luc,” Apocrypha 6: 6777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amsler, Frédéric 2003. “Les Reconnaissances du Pseudo-Clément comme catéchèse romaneque,” in Marguerat, D. (ed.), La Bible en récits: L’exégese biblique à l’heure du lecteur. Geneva: Labor et Fides, 141167.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. W. (ed.) 1984. Creation in the Old Testament. Philadelphia: Fortress.Google Scholar
Anderson, Gary A. 1987. Sacrifices and Offerings in Ancient Israel: Studies in their Social and Political Importance. Harvard Semitic Monographs 41. Atlanta: Scholars.Google Scholar
Angel, Joseph L. 2010. Otherworldly and Eschatological Priesthood in the Dead Sea Scrolls. Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah 86. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antwi, Daniel J. 1991. “Did Jesus Consider His Death to be an Atoning Sacrifice?Interpretation 45: 1728.Google Scholar
Arai, S. 1988. “Zum ‘Tempelwort’ Jesu in Apostelgeschichte 6.14,” New Testament Studies 34: 397410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arens, E. 1976. The ΗΛΘΟΝ-Sayings in the Synoptic Tradition. Orbis Biblicus et orientalis 10. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Arnal, William E. 2005. The Symbolic Jesus: Historical Scholarship, Judaism, and the Construction of Contemporary Identity. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Astell, Ann W. and Goodhart, Sandor (eds.) 2011. “Substitutive Reading: An Introduction to Girardian Thinking, Its Reception in Biblical Studies, and This Volume,” in Astell, A. W. and Goodhart, S (eds.), Sacrifice, Scripture, and Substitution: Readings in Ancient Judaism and Christianity. Christianity and Judaism in Antiquity Series 18. Notre Dame University Press, 136.Google Scholar
Attridge, Harold W. 2014. “The Temple and Jesus the High Priest in the New Testament,” in Charlesworth, J. H. (ed.), Jesus and the Temple: Textual and Archaeological Explorations. Minneapolis: Fortress, 213247.Google Scholar
Aulén, Gustaf 1969 (1931). Christus Victor: An Historical Study of the Three Main Types of the Idea of Atonement. Translated by Herber, A. G.. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Baarda, T. 1985. “1 Thess. 2:14–16: Rodrigues in ‘Nestle-Aland,’” Nederlands theologisch tijdschrift 39: 186–93.
Badia, Leonard F. 1980. The Qumran Baptism and John the Baptist’s Baptism. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Bailie, Gil 1995. Violence Unveiled: Humanity at the Crossroads. New York: Crossroad.Google Scholar
Bammel, E. 1986. “A New Variant Form of the Testimonium Flavianum,” in Judaica. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 37. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 190193.Google Scholar
Bandera, Pablo 2007. “Love vs. Resentment: The Absence of Positive Mimesis in Generative Anthropology,” Contagion: Journal of Violence, Mimesis, and Culture 14: 1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, R. 1975. Jesus and the Law in the Synoptic Tradition. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baras, Z. 1977. “Testimonium Flavianum: The State of Recent Scholarship,” in Avi-Yonah, M. and Baras, Z. (eds.), Society and Religion in the Second Temple Period. The World History of the Jewish People VII. Jerusalem: Massada, 303313, 378–385.Google Scholar
Barber, Michael Patrick 2013. “Jesus as the Davidic Temple Builder and Peter’s Priestly Role in Matthew 16:16–19,” Journal of Biblical Literature 132.4: 935953.Google Scholar
Barclay, John and Sweet, John (eds.) 1996. Early Christian Thought in its Jewish Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bareille, G. 1911. “Elcésaites,” Dictionnaire de théologie catholique 4/2: 22332239.Google Scholar
Barnett, P. 1999. Jesus and the Rise of Early Christianity: A History of New Testament Times. Downers Grove: InterVarsity.Google Scholar
Barrett, C. K. 1955. The Gospel According to St. John. London: SPCK.Google Scholar
Barstad, Hans M. 1994. “The Future of the ‘Servant Songs’: Some Reflections on the Relationship of Biblical Scholarship to Its Own Tradition,” in Barr Festschrift. Oxford: Clarendon, 261270.Google Scholar
Barth, G. 1961. “Das Gesetzesverständnis des Evangelisten Mätthaus,” in Bornkamm, G., Barth, G., and Held Neukirchern, H. J. (eds.), Überlieferung und Auslegung im Matthäusevangelium. Wissenschaftliche Monographien zum Alten und Neuen Testament 1. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener, 54154.Google Scholar
Barth, G. 1992. Der Tod Jesu Christi im Verständnis des Neuen Testaments. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener.Google Scholar
Bauckham, Richard 1986. “The Coin in the Fish’s Mouth,” in Wenham, D. and Blomberg, C. (eds.), Gospel Perspectives VI: The Miracles of Jesus. Sheffield: JSOT, 219252.Google Scholar
Bauckham, Richard 1988. “Jesus’ Demonstration in the Temple,” in Lindars, B. (ed.), Law and Religion: Essays on the Place of the Law in Israel and Early Christianity. Cambridge: James Clarke & Co., 7289.Google Scholar
Bauckham, Richard 1990. Jude and the Relatives of Jesus in the Early Church. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Bauckham, Richard 2003. “The Origin of the Ebionites,” in Tomson, Peter J. and Lambers-Petry, Doris (eds.), The Image of the Judaeo-Christians in Ancient Jewish and Christian Literature. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 158. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 162181.Google Scholar
Bauckham, Richard 2006. Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
Bauckham, Richard 2011. Living with Other Creatures: Green Exegesis and Theology. Waco: Baylor University Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, Walter 1967. “Jesus der Galiläer,” in Strecker, G. (ed.), Aufsätze und Kleine Schriften. Tübingen: Mohr, 91108.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Albert I. 1994. “Josephus on Essene Sacrifice,” Journal of Jewish Studies 45: 169183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgarten, Albert I. 1997. The Flourishing of Jewish Sects in the Maccabean Era: An Interpretation. Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism 55. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Albert I. (ed.) 2002. Sacrifice in Religious Experience. Studies in the History of Religions 93. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Joseph M. 1953. “Sacrifice and Worship among the Jewish Sectarians of the Dead (Qumran) Scrolls,” Harvard Theological Review 46.3: 141159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgarten, Joseph M. 1977. “The Essenes and the Temple: A Reappraisal,” in Studies in Qumran Law. Leiden: Brill, 5962.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Joseph M. 1989. “4Q500 and the Ancient Conceptions of the Lord’s Vineyard,” Journal of Jewish Studies 40: 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgarten, Joseph M. 1990. “The Qumran-Essene Restraints on Marriage,” in Schiffman, L. H. (ed.), Archaeology and History in the Dead Sea Scrolls: The New York University Conference in Memory of Yigael Yadin. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1324.Google Scholar
Baur, F. C. 1838. Über den Ursprung des Episcopats in der christlichen Kirche. Tübingen: Ludwig Friedrich Fues.Google Scholar
Baur, F. C. 1860. Das Christentum und die christliche Kirche der drei ersten Jahrhunderte. 2nd ed. Tübingen: Ludwig Friedrich Fues.Google Scholar
Beal, Todd S. 1988. Josephus’ Description of the Essenes Illustrated by the Dead Sea Scrolls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beasley-Murray, G. R. 1987. John. Word Biblical Commentary 36. Waco: Word Books.Google Scholar
Becker, Adam H. and Reed, Annette Yoshiko (eds.) 2003. The Ways that Never Parted: Jews and Christians in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. Texte und Studien zum antiken Judentum 95. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Becker, Jürgen 1972. Johannes der Täufer und Jesus von Nazareth. Biblische Studien (Neukirchen) 63. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener.Google Scholar
Becker, Jürgen. Jesus of Nazareth 1998. Translated by Couch, J. E.. New York: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckwith, Roger T. 1988. “The Vegeterianism of the Therapeutae, and the Motives for Vegetarianism in Early Jewish and Christian Circles,” Revue de Qumran 13: 407410.Google Scholar
Beckwith, Roger T. and Selman, Martin 1995. Sacrifice in the Bible. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House.Google Scholar
Beily, J. and Eddy, P. R. (eds.) 2006. The Nature of the Atonement. Downers Grove: InterVarsity.Google Scholar
Bellinger, Jr., W. H. and Farmer, W. R. 1998. Jesus and the Suffering Servant. Harrisburg: Trinity Press International.Google Scholar
Berger, K. 1972. Die Gesetzesauslegung Jesu. Ihr historischer Hintergrund im Judentum und im Alten Testament. Teil I: Markus und Parallelen. Wissenschaftliche Monographien zum Alten und Neuen Testament 40. Neukirchener-Vluyn: Neukirchener.Google Scholar
Berman, Saul J. 1975. “Lifnim Mishurat Hadin,” Journal of Jewish Studies 26: 86104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Saul J. 1977. “Lifnim Mishurat Hadin,” Journal of Jewish Studies 28: 181193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, John Henry 1928. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to St. John. 2 vols. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Bertrand, D. A. 1980. “L’Evangile des Ebionites: une harmonie évangélique antérieure au Diatessaron,” New Testament Studies 26: 548563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betz, Hans Dieter 1995. The Sermon on the Mount. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
Betz, Hans Dieter 1997. “Jesus and the Purity of the Temple (Mark 11:15–18): A Comparative Religion Approach,” Journal of Biblical Literature 116: 455472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betz, Johannes 1996. “Eucharist in the Didache,” in Draper, J. A. (ed.), The Didache in Modern Research. Leiden: Brill, 244275.Google Scholar
Betz, Otto 2009. “Jesus and Isaiah 53,” in Bellinger, William H. and Farmer, William R. (eds.), Jesus and the Suffering Servant: Isaiah 53 and Christian Origins. Eugene: Wipf and Stock, 7087.Google Scholar
Bickerman, Elias J. 1947. “The Warning Inscriptions of Herod’s Temple,” The Jewish Quarterly Review 37.4: 387405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Matthew 1985. The Book of Enoch or 1 Enoch: A New English Edition with Commentary and Textual Notes. Studia in Veteris Testamenti pseudepigraphica 7. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Blomberg, C. L. 1986. “The Law in Luke-Acts,” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 22: 5380.Google Scholar
Boccaccini, Gabriele 1998. Beyond the Essene Hypothesis: The Parting of the Ways between Qumran and Enochic Judaism. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Boccaccini, Gabriele 1995. “The Preexistence of the Torah: A Commonplace in Second Temple Judaism, or a Later Rabbinic Development?Henoch 17: 329–50.Google Scholar
Boccaccini, Gabriele 2009. “From a Movement of Dissent to a Distinct Form of Judaism: The Heavenly Tablets in Jubilees as the Foundation of a Competing Halakah,” in Boccaccini, G. and Ibba, G. (eds.), Enoch and the Mosaic Torah: The Evidence of Jubilees. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 193210.Google Scholar
Bock, Darrell L. 2012. “What Did Jesus Do that Got Him into Trouble? Jesus in the Continuum of Early Judaism-Early Christianity,” in Holmén, Tom (ed.), Jesus in Continuum. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 289. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 171210.Google Scholar
Bockmuehl, Markus 1989. “Matthew 5:32; 19:9 in the Light of Pre-Rabbinic Halakah,” New Testament Studies 35: 291–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bockmuehl, Markus 2000. Jewish Law in Gentile Churches: Halakhah and the Beginnings of Christian Public Ethics. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Bockmuehl, Markus 2001. “1 Thessalonians 2:14–16 and the Church in Jerusalem,” Tyndale Bulletin 52.1: 131.Google Scholar
Bodewitz, Henk W. 1999. “Hindu Ahimsā and its Roots,” in Houben, Jan E. M. and Van Kooij, Karel R. (eds.), Violence Denied: Violence, Non-Violence and the Rationalization of Violence in South Asian Cultural History. Brill’s Indological Library 16. Leiden: Brill, 1744.Google Scholar
Boismard, M.-E. 1966. “Evangile des Ebionites et problème synoptique (Mc 1, 2–6 and par.),” Revue Biblique 73: 321352.Google Scholar
Bond, Helen K. 1998. Pontius Pilate in History and Interpretation. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, Helen K. 2004. Caiaphas: Friend of Rome and Judge of Jesus. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar
Bond, Helen K. 2012. The Historical Jesus: A Guide for The Perplexed. London; New York: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Bond, Helen K. 2013. “Dating the Death of Jesus: Memory and the Religious Imagination,” New Testament Studies 59.4, 461475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borg, Marcus J. 1984. Conflict, Holiness, and Politics in the Teaching of Jesus. New York: Edwin Mellen.Google Scholar
Böttrich, C. 1997. “Jesus und der Feigenbaum. Mk 11:12–14, 20–25 in der Diskussion,” Novum Testamentum 39: 328–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourgel, Jonathan 2015. “Reconnaissances 1.27-71, ou la réponse d’un groupe judéo-chrétien de Judée au désastre du soulèvement de Bar-Kokhba,” New Testament Studies 61.1, 3049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boustan, Ra’anan 2005. From Martyr to Mystic: Rabbinic Martyrology and the Making of Merkavah Mysticism. Texts and Studies in Ancient Judaism 112. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Boustan, Ra’anan 2008. Review of Jonathan Klawans’s Purity, Sacrifice, and the Temple. AJS Review 32:1: 169219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boustan, Ra’anan and Reed, Annette Yoshiko 2008. “Blood and Atonement in the Pseudo-Clementines and The Story of the Ten Martyrs: The Problem of Selectivity in the Study of ‘Judaism’ and ‘Christianity,’” Henoch 30: 333364.Google Scholar
Boyarin, Daniel 1999. Dying for God: Martyrdom and the Making of Christianity and Judaism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Boyarin, Daniel 2001. “Justin Martyr Invents Judaism,” Church History 70: 427461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyarin, Daniel 2004. Border Lines: The Partition of Judaeo-Christianity. Divinations. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyarin, Daniel 2009. “Rethinking Jewish Christianity: An Argument for Dismantling a Dubious Category (to which is Appended a Correction of my Border Lines),” Jewish Quarterly Review 99.1: 736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Gregory A. 2006. “Christus Victor View,” in Beilby, J. and Eddy, P. R. (eds.), The Nature of the Atonement. Downers Grove: InterVarsity, 2366.Google Scholar
Brandon, S. G. F. 1967. Jesus and the Zealots: A Study of the Political Factor in Primitive Christianity. New York: Scribners.Google Scholar
Brandt, W. 1912. Elchasai, ein Religionsstifter und sein Werk. Beiträge zur jüdischen, christlichen und allgemeinen Religionsgeschichte. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs.Google Scholar
Brandt, W. 1912. “Elkesaites, ,” in Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics V. 262269.
Brawley, Robert L. 1987. Luke-Acts and the Jews: Conflict, Apology, and Conciliation. Society of Biblical Literature Monograph Series 23. Atlanta: Scholars.Google Scholar
Breytenbach, C. and Schröter, J. (eds.) 2004. Die Apostelgeschichte und die hellenistiche Geschichtsschreibung: Festschrift für Eckhard Plümacher zu seinem 65. Geburtstag. Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity 57. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Briggs, C. A. 1883. “The Argument E Silentio: With Special Relation to the Religion of Israel,” Journal of the Society of Biblical Literature and Exegesis 3: 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brin, G. 1997. “Divorce at Qumran,” in Bernstein, M., F. García Martínez, and J. Kampen (eds.), Legal Texts and Legal Issues: Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the International Organization for Qumran Studies Cambridge 1995. Leiden: Brill, 231249.Google Scholar
Broadhead, Edwin K. 1992. “Mark 1,44: The Witness of the Leper,” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 83: 257265.Google Scholar
Broadhead, Edwin K. 1992. “Christology as Polemic and Apologetic: The Priestly Portrait of Jesus in the Gospel of Mark,” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 47: 2134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadhead, Edwin K. 2010. Jewish Ways of Following Jesus: Redrawing the Religious Map of Antiquity. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 266. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Broer, I. 1980. Freiheit vom Gesetz und Radikalisierung des Gesetzes. Stuttgarter Bibelstudien 98. Stuttgart: KBW.Google Scholar
Brooke, George J. 1985. Exegesis at Qumran: 4QFlorilegium in its Jewish Context. Supplements to the Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Sup 29. Sheffield: JSOT.Google Scholar
Brooke, George J. 1995. “4Q500 1 and the Use of Scripture in the Parable of the Vineyard,” Dead Sea Discoveries 2: 268294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooke, George J. 1998. “Shared Intertextual Interpretations in the Dead Sea Scrolls and the New Testament,” in Stone, M. E. and Chazon, E. G. (eds.), Biblical Perspectives: Early Use and Interpretation of the Bible in Light of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah 28. Leiden: Brill, 3557.Google Scholar
Brooke, George J. 1999. “Miqdash Adam, Eden and the Qumran Community,” in Ego, B., A. Lange, and P. Pilhofer (eds.), Gemeinde ohne Tempel-Community without Temple: Zur Substituierung und Transformation des Jerusalemer Tempels und seines Kultes im Alten Testament, antiken Judentum und fruhen Christentum. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 118. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 285330.Google Scholar
Brooke, George J. 2005. The Dead Sea Scrolls and the New Testament. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
Brown, Raymond E. 1973. The Virginal Conception and Bodily Resurrection of Jesus. New York: Paulist.Google Scholar
Brown, Raymond E. 1983. “Not Jewish Christianity and Gentile Christianity but Types of Jewish/Gentile Christianity,” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 45: 7479.Google Scholar
Brown, Raymond E. 1994. The Death of the Messiah: From Gethsemane to the Grave: A Commentary on the Passion Narratives in the Four Gospels. 2 vols. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Bruce, F. F. 1983. The Gospel of John. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Bryan, Steven M. 2002. Jesus and Israel’s Traditions of Judgement and Restoration. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 117. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf 1913. “Was läßt die Spruchquelle über die Urgemeinde erkennen,” Oldenburgisches Kirchenblatt 19: 3537, 41–44.Google Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf 1961. “New Testament and Mythology: The Mythological Element in the Message of the New Testament and the Problem of its Re-Interpretation,” in H.W. Bartsch (ed.), Kerygma and Myth: A Theological Debate. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf 1963. The History of the Synoptic Tradition. Translated by Marsh, John. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf 1967. “Das Verhältnis der urchristlichen Christusbotschaft zum historischen Jesus,” in Dinkler, D. (ed.), Exegetica. Aufsätze zur Erforschung des Neuen Testaments. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 445469.Google Scholar
Burkert, Walter 1983. Homo Necans: The Anthropology of Ancient Greek Sacrificial Ritual and Myth. Translated by Bing, Peter. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Byrskog, Samuel 2000. Story as History—History as Story: The Gospel Tradition in the Context of Ancient Oral History. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 123. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Cadoux, A. T. 1931. The Parables of Jesus: Their Art and Use. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Caird, G. B. 1995. New Testament Theology. Hurst, L. D. (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Ron 1982. The Other Gospels: Non-Canonical Gospel Texts. Philadelphia: Westminster.Google Scholar
Campbell, K. M. 1978. “The New Jerusalem in Matthew 5:14,” Scottish Journal of Theology 31: 335363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Donald H. 2013. Jewish-Christian Interpretation of the Pentateuch in the Pseudo-Clementine Homilies. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
Carroll, John T. and Green, Joel B. 1995. “Paul’s Theology of the Cross,” in Carroll, J. T. and Green, J. B. (eds.), The Death of Jesus in Early Christianity. Peabody: Hendrickson, 113132.Google Scholar
Carter, C. 2003. Understanding Religious Sacrifice: A Reader. London; New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Casabona, Jean 1966. Recherches sur le vocabulaire des sacrifices en grec, des origines à la fin de l’époque classique. Paris: Editions Ophrys.Google Scholar
Casey, P. Maurice 1997. “Culture and Historicity: The Cleansing of the Temple,” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 59: 306332.Google Scholar
Casey, P. Maurice 1998. Aramaic Sources of Mark’s Gospel. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 102. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Catchpole, David R. 1970. “The Problem of the Historicity of the Sanhedrin Trial,” in Bammel, E. (ed.), The Trial of Jesus – Cambridge Studies in Honour of C. F. D. Moule. Studies in Biblical Theology 2.13. London: SCM, 4765.Google Scholar
Catchpole, David R. 1971. The Trial of Jesus. Studia Post-Biblica 18. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Catchpole, David R. 1975. “The Synoptic Divorce Material as a Traditio-Historical Problem,” Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester 57: 92127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catchpole, David R. 1987. “The Law and the Prophets in Q,” in Hawthorne, G. F. and Betz, O. (eds.), Tradition and Interpretation in the New Testament: Essays in Honor of E. Earle Ellis for his 60th Birthday. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 95109.Google Scholar
Catchpole, David R. 1993. The Quest for Q. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Cave, H. C. 1979. “The Leper: Mk 1:40–45,” New Testament Studies 25: 245250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chance, J. Bradley 1988. Jerusalem, the Temple, and the New Age in Luke-Acts. Macon: Mercer.Google Scholar
Chanikuzhy, Jacob 2012. Jesus, The Eschatological Temple: An Exegetical Study of Jn 2,13–22 in the Light of the Pre-70 C.E. Eschatological Temple Hopes and the Synoptic Temple Action. Contributions to Biblical Exegesis and Theology. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Chapman, David W. 2008. Ancient Jewish and Christian Perceptions of Crucifixion. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament II.244. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, James H. (ed.) 2014. Jesus and Temple: Textual and Archaeological Explorations. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
Chávez, Emilio G. 2002. The Theological Significance of Jesus’ Temple Action in Mark’s Gospel. Toronto Studies in Theology 87. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen.Google Scholar
Chilton, Bruce 1990. “A Coin of Three Realms (Matthew 17.24–27),” in Clines, D. J. A., Fowl, S. E., andPorter, S. E. (eds.), The Bible in Three Dimensions: Essays in Celebration of Forty Years of Biblical Studies in the University of Sheffield. Supplements to the Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 87. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 269282.Google Scholar
Chilton, Bruce 1992. The Temple of Jesus: His Sacrificial Program Within a Cultural History of Sacrifice. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Chilton, Bruce 1993. “René Girard, James Williams, and the Genesis of Violence,” Bulletin for Biblical Research 3: 1729.Google Scholar
Chilton, Bruce 1994. Judaic Approaches to the Gospels. Atlanta: Scholars.Google Scholar
Chilton, Bruce 1994. A Feast of Meanings: Eucharistic Theologies from Jesus through Johannine Circles. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Chilton, Bruce 2008. Abraham’s Curse: The Roots of Violence in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Chilton, Bruce 2011. “The Eucharist and the Mimesis of Sacrifice,” in Astell, A. W. and Goodhart, S. (eds.), Sacrifice, Scripture, & Substitution: Readings in Ancient Judaism and Christianity. Christianity and Judaism in Antiquity 18. Notre Dame: University of Notre Damee Press, 140154.Google Scholar
Chilton, Bruce and Evans, Craig A. 1997. Jesus in Context: Temple, Purity, and Restoration. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Clines, David J. A. 1976. I, He, We, and They: A Literary Approach to Isaiah 53. Sheffield: JSOT.Google Scholar
Cohn, Haim Hermann 1977. The Trial and Death of Jesus. New York: Ktav Publishing.Google Scholar
Cohn, Naftali S. 2013. The Memory of the Temple and the Making of the Rabbis. Divinations. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coloe, Mary L. 2001. God Dwells with Us: Temple Symbolism in the Fourth Gospel. Collegeville: Liturgical Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Adela Yarbro 2001. “Jesus’ Action in Herod’s Temple,” in Collins, A. Yarbro and Mitchell, M. (eds.), Antiquity and Humanity: Essays on Ancient Religion and Philosophy. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 4561.Google Scholar
Collins, Adela Yarbro 2007. Mark: A Commentary. Hermeneia. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
Collins, John J. 1978. “The Root of Immortality: Death in the Context of Jewish Wisdom,” Harvard Theological Review 71: 1792.Google Scholar
Collins, R. F. 1984. Studies on the First Letter to the Thessalonians. Bibliotheca ephemeridum theologicarum lovaniensium 66. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Collins, John J. 1997. “Creation and the Origin of Evil,” in Apocalypticism in the Dead Sea Scrolls. London: Routledge, 3051.Google Scholar
Conzelmann, H. 1960. The Theology of Saint Luke. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Conzelmann, H. 1965. “On the Analysis of the Confessional Formula in 1 Corinthians 15:3–5,” Interpretation 20: 1525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conzelmann, H. 1965. “Zur Analyse der Bekenntnisformel I. Kor 15,3–5,” Evangelische Theologie 25: 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Michael J. 2011. “How Credible Is Jewish Scholarship on Jesus?” in Garber, Z. (ed.), The Jewish Jesus: Revelation, Reflection, Reclamation. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press, 251270.Google Scholar
Coté, D. 2001. Le thème de l’opposition entre Pierre et Simon dans les Pseudo-Clémentines. Études Augustiniennes Série Antiquités 167. Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Cromhout, Markus 2007. Jesus and Identity: Reconstructing Judean Ethnicity in Q. Matrix: The Bible in Mediterranean Context. Eugene: Cascade.Google Scholar
Crook, Zeba A. 2013. “Collective Memory Distortion and the Quest for the Historical Jesus,” Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus 11, 5376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, Frank Moore 1995. The Ancient Library of Qumran. 3rd edn. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
Crossan, John Dominic 1971. “The Parable of the Wicked Husbandmen,” Journal of Biblical Literature 90: 451465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crossan, John Dominic 1973. In Parables: The Challenge of the Historical Jesus. New York: Harper San Francisco.Google Scholar
Crossan, John Dominic 1991. The Historical Jesus: The Life of a Mediterranean Jewish Peasant. San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco.Google Scholar
Crossan, John Dominic 1995. Who Killed Jesus? Exposing the Roots of Anti-Semitism in the Gospel Story of the Death of Jesus. San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco.Google Scholar
Crossan, John Dominic 1998. The Birth of Christianity: Discovering What Happened in the Years Immediately After the Execution of Jesus. San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco.Google Scholar
Crossley, James G. 2004. The Date of Mark’s Gospel: Insights from the Law in Earliest Christianity. London: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Crossley, James G. 2006. Why Christianity Happened: A Sociohistorical Account of Christian Origins (26–50 CE). Louisville: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar
Crossley, James G. 2010. “Mark’s Christology and a Scholarly Creation of a Non-Jewish Christ of Faith,” in Crossley, J. G. (ed.), Judaism, Jewish Identities and the Gospel Tradition: Essays in Honour of Maurice Casey. London: Equinox, 118151.Google Scholar
Crossley, James G. 2010. The New Testament and Jewish Law: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: T & T Clark International.Google Scholar
Crossley, James G. 2013. “A ‘Very Jewish’ Jesus: Perpetuating the Myth of Superiority.” Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus 11: 109129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullmann, Oscar 1963. The Christology of the New Testament. London: SCM.Google Scholar
Dahl, N.A. 1962. “The Problem of the Historical Jesus,” in C.E. Braaten and R. A. Harrisville (eds.), Kerygma and History: A Symposium on the Theology of Rudolf Bultmann. Nashville: Abingdon, 138171.Google Scholar
Dalman, Gustaf 1893. Jesus Christ in the Talmud, Midrash, Zohar and the Liturgy of the Synagogue. Cambridge: Deighton & Bell.Google Scholar
Daly, Robert J. 2005. “Eucharistic Origins: From the New Testament to the Liturgies of the Golden Age,” Theological Studies 66: 322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, Robert 1978. Christian Sacrifice: The Judaeo-Christian Background Before Origen. Washington: Catholic University of America.Google Scholar
Danielou, Jean 1964. The Theology of Jewish Christianity. Translated by Baker, J. A.. London: Darton, Longman, and Todd.Google Scholar
Das, A. Andrew 2001. Paul, the Law, and the Covenant. Peabody: Hendrickson.Google Scholar
Daube, David 1962. “Death as Release in the Bible,” Novum Testamentum 5: 82104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daube, David 1987. “Temple Tax,” in Sanders, E. P. (ed.), Jesus, the Gospels and the Church. Macon: Mercer University Press, 121134.Google Scholar
Dautzenberg, Gerhard 1991. “Jesus und der Temple. Beobachtungen zur Exegese der Perikope von der Tempelsteuer (Mt 17,24–27),” in Oberlinner, I. and Fiedler, P. (eds.), Salz der Erde – Licht der Welt: Exegetische Studien zum Matthäusevangelium. FS für Anton Vögtle zum 80. Geburtstag. Stuttgart: KBW, 223238.Google Scholar
Dautzenberg, Gerhard 1992. “Tora des Menschensohnes? Kritische?-erlegungen zu Daniel Kosch,” Biblische Zeitschrift 36: 93103.Google Scholar
Davies, M. 1993. Matthew. Readings: A New Biblical Commentary. Sheffield: JSOT.Google Scholar
Davies, P. R. 1987. Behind the Essenes: History and Ideology in the Dead Sea Scrolls. Atlanta: Scholars.Google Scholar
Davies, P. R. 1990. “Halakhah at Qumran,” in Davies, P. R. and White, R. T. (eds.), A Tribute to Geza Vermes: Essays on Jewish and Christian Literature and History. Sheffield: JSOT: 3750.Google Scholar
Davies, W. D. 1948. Paul and Rabbinic Judaism: Some Rabbinic Elements in Pauline Theology. London: SPCK.Google Scholar
Davis, Richard A. 1972. “Lifnim Mishurat Hadin: The Rabbinic Concept.” Ph.D. dissertation. Hebrew Union College – Jewish Institute of Religion, New York.
De Heusch, Luc. 1982. “L’Evangile selon Saint-Girard.” Le Monde: 19.Google Scholar
De Heusch, Luc 1985. Sacrifice in Africa: A Structuralist Approach. Translated by O’Brian, L. and Morton, A.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
De Jonge, Marinus 1988. “Jesus’ Death for Others and the Death of the Maccabean Martyrs,” in Baarda, T., A. Hilhorst, G.P. Luttikhuizen, and A.F.J. Klijn (eds.), Text and Testimony: Essays on the New Testament and Apocryphal Literature in Honour of A. F. J. Klijn. Kampen: Kok, 142151.Google Scholar
De Jonge, Marinus 1991. Jesus, The Servant-Messiah. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
De Jonge, Marinus 1998. God’s Final Envoy. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
De Jonge, Henk Jan 2003. “The Cleansing of the Temple in Mark 11:15 and Zechariah 14:21,” in Tuckett, C. (ed.), The Book of Zechariah and its Influence. Burlington: Ashgate, 87100.Google Scholar
De Smedt, Charles 1883. Principes de la critique historique. Paris: Librarie de la Societe Bibliographique.Google Scholar
De Waard, J. 1965. A Comparative Study of the Old Testament Text in the Dead Sea Scrolls and in the New Testament. Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah 4. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Deane, S. N. 1962. St. Anselm: Basic Writings. LaSalle: Open Court.Google Scholar
Deines, R. 2004. Die Gerechtigkeit der Tora im Reich des Messias: Mt 5,13–20 als Schlüsseltext der matthäischen Theologie. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 177. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
DeMaris, Richard E. 2013. “Sacrifice, an Ancient Mediterranean Ritual.” Biblical Theology Bulletin 43: 6073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denney, James 1903. The Death of Christ: Its Place and Interpretation in the New Testament. 3rd edn. New York: A. C. Armstrong and Sons.Google Scholar
Derrett, J. D. M. 1977. “The Zeal of thy House and the Cleansing of the Temple,” Downside Review 95: 7994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detienne, Marcel and Vernant, Jean-Pierre 1989. The Cuisine of Sacrifice among the Greeks. Translated by Wissing, Paula. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dettwiler, Andreas 2008. “La source Q et la Torah,” in Dettwiler, A. and Marguerat, D. (eds.), La source des paroles de Jésus (Q): Aux origines du christianisme. Le Monde de la Bible 62. Geneva: Labor et Fides, 221254.Google Scholar
Dillmann, August 1853. Das Buch Henoch übersetzt und erklärt. Leipzig: Vogel.Google Scholar
Dillon, Richard J. 1987. “The Psalms of the Suffering Just in the Accounts of Jesus’ Passion,” Worship 61: 430440.Google Scholar
Dimant, D. 1986. “4QFlorilegium and the Idea of Community as Temple,” in Caquot, A., M. Hadas-Lebel, and J. Riaud (eds.), Hellenica et Judaica: Hommage à Valentin Nikiprowetzky. Leuven: Peeters, 165189.Google Scholar
Doble, Peter 1996. The Paradox of Salvation: Luke’s Theology of the Cross. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 87. Cambridge University Press.
Dodd, C. H. 1961. The Parables of the Kingdom. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Dodd, C. H. 1971. The Founder of Christianity. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Doering, Lutz 2009. “Marriage and Creation in Mark 10 and CD 4–5,” in Martínez, F. García (ed.), Echoes from the Caves: Qumran and the New Testament. Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah 85. Leiden: Brill, 131163.Google Scholar
Doering, Lutz 2011. “Urzeit-Endzeit Correlation in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Pseudepigrapha,” in Eckstein, J., Landmesser, C., and Lichtenberger, H. (eds.), Eschatologie: Eschatology. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 272. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck: 1958.Google Scholar
Dombrowski, Daniel A. 1984. The Philosophy of Vegetarianism. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T. L. 1985. Jesus on the Mountain: A Study in Matthean Typology. Sheffield: JSOT.Google Scholar
Donfried, Karl Paul 2002. Paul, Thessalonica, and Early Christianity. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary 1982. Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Droge, A. J. and Tabor, J. D. 1992. A Noble Death. San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco.Google Scholar
Dumbrell, W. J. 1981. “The Logic of the Law in Matthew V 1–20,” Novum Testamentum 23.1: 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumouchel, P. (ed.) 1988. Violence and Truth: On the Work of René Girard. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Dunn, James D. G. 1980. Christology in the Making: An Inquiry into the Origins of the Doctrine of the Incarnation. London: SCM.Google Scholar
Dunn, James D. G. 1991. “Paul’s Understanding of the Death of Jesus as Sacrifice,” in Sykes, S. (ed.), Sacrifice and Redemption: Durham Essays in Theology. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, James D. G. 1998. The Theology of Paul the Apostle. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Dunn, James D. G. 2008. The New Perspective on Paul. Rev. edn. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Dunn, James D. G. 2003. Jesus Remembered. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Dungan, D. 1971. The Sayings of Jesus in the Churches of Paul: The Use of the Synoptic Tradition in the Regulation of Early Church Life. Philadelphia: Fortress.Google Scholar
Easter, Matthew C. 2010. “The Pistis Christou Debate: Main Arguments and Responses in Summary,” Currents in Biblical Research 9.1: 3347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberhart, Christian A. (ed.) 2011. Ritual and Metaphor: Sacrifice in the Bible. Resources for Biblical Study 68. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Eckhardt, Benedikt 2014. “‘Bloodless Sacrifice’: A Note on Greek Cultic Language in the Imperial Era.” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 54: 255273.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. R. 1989. “Markan Sandwiches: The Significance of Interpolations in Markan Narratives,” Novum Testamentum 31: 193216.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. R. 2002. “The Gospel of the Ebionites and the Gospel of Luke,” New Testament Studies 48: 568586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ego, Beato 2005. “Vergangenheit im Horizont eschatologischer Hoffnung: Die Tiervision (1 Hen 85–90) als Beispiel apolkalypischer Geschichtskonzeption,” in Becker, Eve-Marie (ed.), Die antike Historiographie und die Anfänge der christlichen Geschichtsschreibung. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 171195.Google Scholar
Ehrman, Bart D. 2012. The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings. 5th edn. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eidevall, Göran 2011. “The Role of Sacrificial Language in Prophetic Rhetoric,” in Eberhart, C. (ed.), Ritual and Metaphor: Sacrifice in the Bible. Resources for Biblical Study 68. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 4961.Google Scholar
Eisler, Robert 1931 (1929–1930). “The Baptist’s Food and Clothing,” in The Messiah Jesus and John the Baptist according to Flavius Josephus’ Recently Rediscovered ‘Capture of Jerusalem’ and Other Jewish and Christian Sources. New York: L. MacVeagh [Dial], 235240.Google Scholar
Elliott, John H. 2007. “Jesus the Israelite was neither a ‘Jew’ nor a ‘Christian’: On Correcting Misleading Nomenclature,” Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus 5/2: 119154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eppstein, V. 1964. “The Historicity of the Gospel Account of the Cleansing of the Temple,” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 55: 4258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eschner, Christina 2010. Gestorben und hingegeben “für” die Sünder. Die griechische Konzeption des Unheil abwendenden Sterbens und deren paulinische Aufnahme für die Deutung des Todes Jesu Christi. Wissenschaftliche Monographien zum Alten und Neuen Testament 122. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener.Google Scholar
Esler, P. 1987. Community and Gospel in Luke-Acts: The Social and Political Motivations of Lucan Theology. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Craig A. 1989. “Jesus’ Action in the Temple: Cleansing or Portent of Destruction?Catholic Biblical Quarterly 51: 237270.Google Scholar
Evans, Craig A. 1989. “Jesus’ Action in the Temple and Evidence of Corruption in the First-Century Temple,” in Lull, D. J. (ed.), Society of Biblical Literature 1989 Seminar Papers. Society of Biblical Literature Seminar Papers 28. Atlanta: Scholars, 522539.Google Scholar
Evans, Craig A. 1992. “Predictions of the Destruction of the Herodian Temple in the Pseudepigrapha, Qumran Scrolls, and Related Texts,” Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha 10: 89146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Craig A. 1992. “Opposition to the Temple: Jesus and the Dead Sea Scrolls,” in Charlesworth, J. H. (ed.), Jesus and the Dead Sea Scrolls. New York: Doubleday, 235253.Google Scholar
Evans, Craig A. 1993. “Jesus and the “Cave of Robbers”: Toward a Jewish Context for the Temple Action,” Bulletin for Biblical Research 2: 92110.Google Scholar
Evans, Craig A. 1996. “Jesus’ Parable of the Tenant Farmers in Light of Lease Agreements in Antiquity,” Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha 14: 2583.Google Scholar
Evans, Craig A. 1997. “From ‘House of Prayer’ to ‘Cave of Robbers’: Jesus’ Prophetic Criticism of the Temple Establishment,” in Evans, C. A. and Talmon, S. (eds.), The Quest for Context and Meaning: Studies in Biblical Intertextuality in Honor of James A. Sanders. Leiden: Brill, 417442.Google Scholar
Evans, Craig A. 1997. “Jesus’ Action in the Temple: Cleansing or Portent of Destruction?” in Chilton, B. and Evans, C. A. (eds.), Jesus in Context: Temple, Purity and Restoration. Arbeiten zur Geschichte des antiken Judtentums und des Urchristentums 39. Leiden: Brill, 395439.Google Scholar
Evans, Craig A. 1999. “Jesus and James: Martyrs of the Temple,” in Chilton, B. D. and Evans, C. A. (eds.), James the Just and Christian Origins. Novum Testamentum Supplements 98. Leiden: Brill, 233249.Google Scholar
Evans, Craig A. 2001. Mark 8:27–16:20. Word Biblical Commentary 34B. Nashville: Thomas Nelson.Google Scholar
Evans, Craig A. 2003. “How Septuagintal is Isa 5:1–7 in Mark 12:1–9?Novum Testamentum 45: 105110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Craig A. 2007. “The Jewish Christian Gospel Tradition,” in Skarsaune, O. and Hvalvik, R. (eds.), Jewish Believers in Jesus: The Early Centuries. Peabody: Hendrickson, 241277.Google Scholar
Evans, Craig A. 2014. From Jesus to the Church: The First Christian Generation. Grand Rapids: Westminster John Knox Press.Google Scholar
Fander, M. 1989. Die Stellung der Frau im Markusevangelium. Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung kultur- und religionsgeschichtlicher Hintergründe. Münsteraner Theologische Abhandlungen 8. Altenberge: Telos.Google Scholar
Faßbeck, Gabriele 2000. Der Tempel der Christen. Traditionsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen zur Aufnahme des Tempelkonzepts im frühen Christentum. Texte und Arbeiten zum neutestamentlichen Zeitalter 33. Tübingen: Francke.Google Scholar
Faraone, Christopher and Naiden, F. S. (eds.) 2012. Greek and Roman Animal Sacrifice: Ancient Victims, Modern Observers. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, L. H. 1965. Josephus: Jewish Antiquities, Books, XVIII-XIX. Loeb Classical Library 433. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fine, Steven 1997. This Holy Place: On the Sanctity of the Synagogue during the Greco-Roman Period. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Finlan, Stephen 2004. The Background and Content of Paul’s Cultic Atonement Metaphors. Anchor Bible 19. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Finlan, Stephen 2005. Problems with Atonement: The Origins of, and Controversy about, the Atonement Doctrine. Collegeville: Liturgical Press.Google Scholar
Finlan, Stephen 2007. Options on Atonement in Christian Thought. Wilmington.: Michael Glazier.Google Scholar
Finley, Gregory C. 2009. “The Ebionites and ‘Jewish Christianity’: Examining Heresy and the Attitudes of Church Fathers.” Ph.D. dissertation. Catholic University of America.
Fiorenza, Elisabeth Schüssler 1976. “Cultic Language in Qumran and in the NT,” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 38: 159–77.Google Scholar
Fitzmyer, Joseph A. 1955. “The Qumran Scrolls, the Ebionites and their Literature,” Theologicla Studies 16: 335372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzmyer, Joseph A. 1976. “The Matthean Divorce Texts and Some New Palestinian Evidence,” Theological Studies 37: 197226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzmyer, Joseph A. 1989. “The Jewish People and the Mosaic Law in Luke-Acts,” in Luke the Theologian: Aspects of his Teaching. London: Chapman, 175202.Google Scholar
Fleddermann, Harry T. 2005. Q: A Reconstruction and Commentary. Biblical Tools and Studies 1. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Flood, Gavin 2013. “Sacrifice as Refusal,” in Zachhuber, J. and Meszaros, J. T. (eds.), Sacrifice and Modern Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 115131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flusser, David 1961. “Matthew XVII, 24–27 and the Dead Sea Sect,” Tarbiz 31: 150156.Google Scholar
Flusser, David 1969. Jesus. New York: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar
Fonrobert, Charlotte Elisheva 2001. “The Didascalia Apostolorum: A Mishnah for the Disciples of Jesus,” Journal of Early Christian Studies 9: 483509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, Paul 2004. Community, Law and Mission in Matthew’s Gospel. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament II.177. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Foster, Paul 2011. “Paul and Matthew: Two Strands in the Early Jesus Movement with Little Sign of Connection,” in Bird, M. F. and Willitts, J. (eds.), Paul and the Gospels: Christologies, Conflicts and Convergences. Library of New Testament Studies 411. London: T & T Clark, 86114.Google Scholar
Foster, Paul 2013. “Matthew’s Use of ‘Jewish’ Traditions from Q,” in Tiwald, M. (ed.), Kein Jota wird vergehen. Das Gesetzesverständnis der Logienquelle vor dem Hintergrund frühjüdischer Theologie. Beiträge zur Wissenschaft vom Alten und Neuen Testament 200. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer, 179201.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel 1977. Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Fredriksen, Paula 1988 From Jesus to Christ: The Origins of the New Testament Images of Jesus. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fredriksen, Paula 1990Jesus and the Temple, Mark and the War,” in SBL Seminar Papers, 1990. Society of Biblical Literature Seminar Papers 29. Atlanta: Scholars, 293310.Google Scholar
Fredriksen, Paula 1999. Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Fredriksen, Paula 1999. “Did Jesus Oppose the Purity Laws?Biblical Research 11.3: 2025, 42–47.Google Scholar
Fredriksen, Paula 2008. “Gospel Chronologies, the Scene in the Temple, and the Crucifixion of Jesus,” in F.E. Udoh (ed.) Redefining First-Century Jewish and Christian Identities: Essays in Honor of Ed Parish Sanders. Christianity and Judaism in Antiquity 16. Notre Dame: Universityof Notre Dame, 246282.Google Scholar
Fredriksen, Paula 2015. “Arms and The Man: A Response to Dale Martin’s ‘Jesus in Jerusalem: Armed and Not Dangerous,” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 37: 312325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Jörg 2012. “Die Fragmente des Ebionäerevangeliums,” in Markschies, C. and Schröter, J. (eds.), Antike christliche Apokryphen in deutscher Übersetzung 1: Evangelien und Verwandtes 1. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 607620.Google Scholar
Fried, J. 2004. Der Schleier der Erinnerung: Grundzüge einer historischen Memorik. Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Friedrich, G. 1982. Die Verkündigung des Todes Jesu im Neuen Testaments. Biblisch-theologische Studien 6. Neukirchen: Neukirchener.Google Scholar
Fuglseth, Kåre Sigvald 2005. Johannine Sectarianism in Perspective: A Sociological, Historical, and Comparative Analysis of Temple and Social Relationships in the Gospel of John, Philo and Qumran. Novum Testamentum Supplements 119. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Reginald H. 1954. The Mission and Achievement of Jesus. Studies in Biblical Theology 12. London: SCM.Google Scholar
Funk, Robert, Hoover, Roy W. and the Jesus Seminar 1993. The Five Gospels: The Search for the Authentic Words of Jesus: New Translation and Commentary. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
García Martínez, Florentino 1997. “The Heavenly Tablets in the Book of Jubilees,” in Albani, M., J. Frey, and A. Lange (eds.), Studies in the Book of Jubilees. Texte und Studien zum antiken Judentum 65. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 243259.Google Scholar
García Martínez, Florentino 1999. “Man and Woman: Halakhah Based upon Eden in the Dead Sea Scrolls,” in Luttikuizen, G. P. (ed.), Paradise Interpreted: Representations of Biblical Paradise in Judaism and Christianity. Themes in Biblical Narrative 2. Leiden: Brill, 95115.Google Scholar
Gärtner, Bertil 1965. The Temple and the Community in: Qumran and the New Testament: A Comparative Study in the Temple Symbolism of the Qumran Texts and the New Testament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaston, Lloyd 1970. No Stone on Another: Studies in the Significance of the Fall of Jerusalem in the Synoptic Gospels. Novum Testamentum Supplements 23. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Gelston, Anthony 1993. “Knowledge, Humiliation, or Suffering: A Lexical, Textual, and Exegetical Problem in Isaiah 53,” in Whybray, R. N., McKay, H. A., and Clines, D. J. A. (eds.), Of Prophets’ Visions and the Wisdom of Sages: Essays in Honour of R. Norman Whybray on His Seventieth Birthday. Journal of the Study of the Old Testament: Supplement Series 162. Sheffield: JSOT, 126141.Google Scholar
Gese, Hartmut 1981. Essays on Biblical Theology. Translated by Crim, Keith. Minneapolis: Augsburg.Google Scholar
Gieseler, Johann Karl Ludwig 1820. “Über die Nazaräer und Ebioniten,” Archiv für alte und neue Kirchengeschichte 4: 279330.Google Scholar
Giesen, H. 1976. “Der verdorrte Feigenbaum – Eine symbolische Aussage? Zu Mk 11,12–14.20f,” Biblische Zeitschrift 20: 95111.Google Scholar
Gilders, William K. 2011. “Jewish Sacrifice: Its Nature and Function (According to Philo),” in Knust, Jennifer W. and Várhelyi, Zsuzsanna (eds.), Ancient Meditteranean Sacrifice. New York: Oxford University Press, 94105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilliard, Frank D. 1989. “The Problem of the Antisemitic Comma Between 1 Thessalonians 2.14 and 15,” New Testament Studies 35: 481502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girard, Réne 1977. Violence and the Sacred. Translated by Gregory, Patrick. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Girard, Réne 1987. Things Hidden since the Foundation of the World. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Girard, Réne 1986. The Scapegoat. Translated by Frecerro, Yvonne. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Girard, Réne 2001. Celui par qui le scandale arrive. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.Google Scholar
Girard, Réne 2003. Sacrifice. Translated by Pattilo, Matthew and Dawson, David. Breakthroughs in Mimetic Theory. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girard, Réne 2011. “Mimesis, Sacrifice, and the Bible: A Conversation with Sandor Goodhart,” in Astell, A. W. and Goodhart, S. (eds.), Sacrifice, Scripture, & Substitution: Readings in Ancient Judaism and Christianity. Christianity and Judaism in Antiquity 18. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 3969.Google Scholar
Gnilka, G. 1979. Das Evangelium nach Markus. Evangelisch-katholischer Kommentar zum Neuen Testament 11/2. Zürich: Benzinger.Google Scholar
Goodacre, Mark 2006. “Scripturalization in Mark’s Crucifixion Narrative,” in G. van Oyen and T. Shepherd (eds.), The Trial and Death of Jesus: Essays on the Passion Narrative in Mark. Contributions to Biblical Exegesis and Theology 45. Leuven: Peeters, 33–47.
Goodblatt, David 1998. “From Judeans to Israel: Names of Jewish States in Antiquity,” Journal for the Study of Judaism 29: 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Martin 1996. “The Function of Minim in early Rabbinic Judaism,” in Schäfer, P. (ed.), Tradition – Reflexion. Festschrift für Martin Hengel zum 70. Geburtstag, I. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 501510.Google Scholar
Goodman, Martin 2007. “The Temple in First-Century CE Judaism,” in Day, J. (ed.), Temple and Worship in Biblical Israel. New York: T & T Clark, 459468.Google Scholar
Goppelt, Leonhard 1981–1982. Theology of the New Testament. 2 vols. Translated by Alsup, J. E.. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Goulder, Michael 1995. St. Paul versus St. Peter: A Tale of Two Missions. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar
Grant, Michael 1977. Jesus: An Historian’s Review of the Gospels. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Grant, Robert M. and Freedman, David N. 1960. The Secret Sayings of Jesus. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Gray, Timothy C. 2010. The Temple in the Gospel of Mark: A Study in Its Narrative Role. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
Green, Joel B. 1988. The Death of Jesus: Tradition and Interpretation in the Passion Narrative. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament II.33. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Green, Joel B. 1991. The Way of the Cross: Following Jesus in the Gospel of Mark. Nashville: Discipleship Resources.Google Scholar
Gregory, Andrew 2005. “Prior or Posterior? The Gospel of the Ebionites and the Gospel of Luke,” New Testament Studies 51: 344360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregory, Andrew 2008. “Jewish-Christian Gospels,” in Foster, P. (ed.), The Non-canonical Gospels. London: T & T Clark, 5467.Google Scholar
Greisch, Jean 1981. “Une anthropologie fondamentale du rite: René Girard,” in Le rite. Philosophie Institut catholique de Paris, présentation de Jean Greisch. Paris: Beauchesne, 89119.Google Scholar
Gubler, Marie-Louise 1977. Die frühesten Deutungen des Todes Jesu. Orbis biblicus et orientalis 15. Freiburg: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Guelich, R. A. 1976. “The Antitheses of Matt 5:21–48: Traditional and/or Redactional?New Testament Studies 22: 444457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, Nijay K. 2010. Worship That Makes Sense to Paul: A New Approach to the Theology and Ethics of Paul’s Cultic Metaphors. New York and Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurtner, Daniel M. 2007. The Torn Veil: Matthew’s Exposition of the Death of Jesus. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 139. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. 1966. Orpheus and Greek Religion: A Study of the Orphic Movement. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Guttmann, Alexander 1969. “The End of the Jewish Sacrificial Cult,” Hebrew Union College Annual 38: 137148.Google Scholar
Gyanshruti, S. and Srividyananda, S. 2006. Yajna: A Comprehensive Survey. Munger: Yoga Publications Trust.Google Scholar
Haas, N. 1970. “Anthropological Observations on the Skeletal Remains from Giv’at ha-Mivtar,” Israel Exploration Journal 20: 3859.Google Scholar
Haenchen, E. 1968. Die Apostelgeschichte. Kritisch-exegetischer Kommentar Uber das Neue Testament 111. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Haenchen, E. 1984. John, 1, 2. Hermeneia. Philadelphia: Fortress.
Hägerland, Tobias 2011. Jesus and the Forgiveness of Sins: An Aspect of His Prophetic Mission. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hägglund, Fredrik 2008. Isaiah 53 in the Light of Homecoming after Exile. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Hagner, Donald A. 2003. “Matthew: Apostate, Reformer, Revolutionary?New Testament Studies 49: 193209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagner, Donald A. 2009. “Jesus and the Synoptic Sabbath Controversies,” in Bock, D. L. and Webb, R. L. (eds.), Key Events in the Life of the Historical Jesus: A Collaborative Exploration of Context and Coherence. Darrell L. Bock and Robert L. Webb (eds.). Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 251292.Google Scholar
Hahn, Ferdinand 1970. Der urchristliche Gottesdienst. Stuttgarter Bibelstudien 41. Stuttgart: KBW.Google Scholar
Hahn, Ferdinand 2002. Die Einheit des Neuen Testaments: Thematische Darstellung. Vol. 2, Theologie des Neuen Testaments. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Häkkinen, S. 2005. “Ebionites,” in Marjanen, A. and Luomanen, P. (eds.), A Companion to Second-Century Christian “Heretics.” Leiden: Brill, 247278.Google Scholar
Hallo, William W. 1981. The Torah: A Modern Commentary. New York: Union of American Hebrew Congregations.Google Scholar
Hallo, William W. 1987. “The Origins of the Sacrificial Cult: New Evidence from Mesopotamia and Israel,” in Miller, P. D. Jr., Hanson, P. D., and McBridge, S. Dean (eds.), Ancient Israelite Religion: Essays in Honor of Frank Moore Cross. Philadelphia: Fortress, 3–13.Google Scholar
Hallo, William W. 1993. “Lugalbanda Excavated,” Journal of the American Oriental Society 103: 165180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallo, William W. 2011. “The Origin of Israelite Sacrifice,” Biblical Archaeology Review 37/6: 5960, 71.Google Scholar
Hallo, William W. and Simpson, W. K. 1971. The Ancient Near East: A History. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Ham, C. A. 2005. The Coming King and the Rejected Shepherd: Matthew’s Reading of Zechariah’s Messianic Hope. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press.Google Scholar
Hamerton-Kelly, Robert 1992. “Sacred Violence and the Messiah: The Markan Passion Narrative as a Redefinition of Messianology,” in Charlesworth, J. H. (ed.), The Messiah: Developments in Earliest Judaism and Christianity. Philadelphia: Fortress, 461493.Google Scholar
Hamerton-Kelly, Robert 1992. Sacred Violence: Paul’s Hermeneutic of the Cross. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
Hamerton-Kelly, Robert 1994. The Gospel and the Sacred: Poetics of Violence in Mark. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
Hamerton-Kelly, Robert (ed.) 1987. Violent Origins: Walter Burkert, René Girard, and Jonathan Z. Smith on Ritual Killing and Cultural Formation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Han, Kyu Sam 2002. Jerusalem and the Early Jesus Movement: The Q Community’s Attitude Toward the Temple. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 207. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hare, D. R. A. 2000. “How Jewish is the Gospel of Matthew?Catholic Biblical Quarterly 62: 264277.Google Scholar
Harrington, D. J. 1991. The Gospel of Matthew. Sacra Pagina 1. Collegeville: Liturgical Press.Google Scholar
Harrington, D. J. 2008. “Matthew and Paul,” in Sim, D. and Repschinski, B. (eds.), Matthew and His Christian Contemporaries. London: T & T Clark, 1126.Google Scholar
Harvey, A. E. 1982. Jesus and the Constraints of History. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Harvey, Graham 1996. The True Israel: Uses of the Name Jew, Hebrew and Israel in Ancient Jewish and Early Christian Literature. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Haussleiter, Johannes 1935. Der Vegetarismus in der Antike. Religionsgeschichtliche Versuche und Vorarbeiten 24. Berlin: Alfred Töpelmann.Google Scholar
Hays, Richard B. 1997. First Corinthians. Interpretation. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar
Hays, Richard B. 2002. The Faith of Jesus Christ: The Narrative Substructure of Galatians 3:1–4:11. Biblical Resource Series. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Hays, Richard B. 1996. The Jewish Temple: A Non-Biblical Sourcebook. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Head, P. M. 2004. “The Temple in Luke’s Gospel,” in Alexander, T. D. and Gathercole, S. (eds.), Heaven on Earth: The Temple in Biblical Theology. Carlisle: Paternoster, 102119.Google Scholar
Hecht, Richard D. 1982. “Studies on Sacrifice,” Religious Studies Review 8.3: 253259.Google Scholar
Hedley, Douglas 2011. Sacrifice Imagined: Violence, Atonement and the Sacred. New York; London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Heil, Christoph 2013. “Nachfolge und Tora in Q 9 57–60,” in Tiwald, M. (ed.), Kein Jota wird vergehen: das Gesetzesverständnis der Logienquelle vor dem Hintergrund frühjüdischer Theologie. Beiträge zur Wissenschaft vom Alten und Neuen Testament 10. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 111140.Google Scholar
Heil, John P. 1997. “The Narrative Strategy and Pragmatics of the Temple Theme in Mark,” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 59.1: 76100.Google Scholar
Hendel, Ronald S. 1989. “Sacrifice As a Cultural System: The Ritual Symbolism of Exodus 24, 3–8,” Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 101: 366390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hengel, Martin 1961. Die Zeloten: Untersuchungen zur Jüdischen Freiheitsbewegung in der Zeit von Herodes 1.bis 70 n. Chr. Arbeiten zur Geschichte des antiken Judentums und des Urchristentums 1. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Hengel, Martin 1971. Was Jesus a Revolutionist? Translated by Klassen, William. Philadelphia: Fortress.Google Scholar
Hengel, Martin 1977. Crucifixion in the Ancient World and the Folly of the Message of the Cross. Translated by Bowden, John. Philadelphia: Fortress.Google Scholar
Hengel, Martin 1980. “Der stellvertrentende Sühnetod Jesu. Ein Beitrag zur Entstehung des urchristlichen Kerygmas,” Internationale kirchliche Zeitschrift 9: 1–25, 135–47.Google Scholar
Hengel, Martin 1981. The Atonement: The Origins of the Doctrine in the New Testament. Translated by Bowden, John. Philadelphia: Fortress.Google Scholar
Hengel, Martin 1989. The Zealots: Investigations into the Jewish Freedom Movement in the Period from Herod I Until 70 A. D. Translated by Smith, D.. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Hengel, Martin and Schwemer, Anna Maria 2007. Jesus und das Judentum. Vol. I: Geschichte des frühen Christentums. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Henige, David P. 2005. Historical Evidence and Argument. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Henne, P. 1994. “L’Evangile des Ebionites. Une fausse harmonie. Une vraie supercherie,” in Van Damme, D., Kessler, A., Ricklin, T., and Wurst, G. (eds.), Peregrina curiositas. Eine Reise durch den Orbis antiquus. Zu Ehren von Dirk van Damme. Novum Testamentum et orbis antiquus 27. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 5775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herr, Moshe David 1980. “Jerusalem, the Temple, and Its Cult – Reality and Concepts in Second Temple Times,” in Oppenheimer, A., U. Rappaport, and M. Stern (eds.), Jerusalem in the Second Temple Period: Abraham Schalit Memorial Volume. Jerusalem: Yad Ben-Zvi, Ministry of Defense, 166177.Google Scholar
Herzog II, William R. 2000. Jesus, Justice, and the Reign of God. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar
Heskett, Randall 2007. Messianism within the Scriptural Scroll of Isaiah. New York: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Heyman, George 2007. The Power of Sacrifice: Roman and Christian Discourses in Conflict. Washington: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Himmelfarb, Martha 1991. “The Temple and the Garden of Eden in Ezekiel, the Book of Watchers, and the Wisdom of Ben Sira,” in Scott, J. S. and Simpson-Housely, P. (eds.), Sacred Places and Profane Spaces: Essays in the Geographies of Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Westport: Greenwood, 6378.Google Scholar
Himmelfarb, Martha 1993. Ascent to Heaven in Jewish and Christian Apocalypses. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Himmelfarb, Martha 1999. “Torah, Testimony, and Heavenly Tablets: The Claim of Authority of the Book of Jubilees,” in Wright, B. G. (ed.), A Multiform Heritage. Festschrift Robert A. Kraft. Atlanta: Scholars, 1929.Google Scholar
Hitch, Sarah and Rutherford, Ian (eds.) 2015. Animal Sacrifice in the Ancient World. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Paul 1972. Studien zur Theologie der Logienquelle. Neutestamentliche Abhandlungen 8. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
Hogeterp, Albert L.A. 2006. Paul and God’s Temple: A Historical Interpretation of Cultic Imagery in the Corinthian Correspondence. Biblical Tools and Studies 2. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Hogg, Michael A. and Abrams, Dominic 2007. “Intergroup Behavior and Social Identity,” in Hogg, M. A. and Cooper, J. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Social Psychology. Concise Student Edition. Los Angeles: Sage, 335360.Google Scholar
Holdrege, Barbara A. 1996. Veda and Torah: Transcending the Textuality of Scripture. Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
Holl, Karl (ed.) 1915, 1933. Ancoratus und Panarion. 3 vols. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs.Google Scholar
Holmås, Geir Otto 2005. “‘My House Shall Be a House of Prayer,’ Regarding the Temple as a Place of Prayer in Acts within the Context of Luke’s Apologetic Objective,” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 27: 394416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmén, Tom 2000. “The Temple Action of Jesus (Mark 11:15–17) in Historical Context,” in Illman, K-J., Ahlbäck, T., Back, S.-O., and Nurmela, R (eds.), A Bouquet of Wisdom: Essays in Honour of Karl-Gustav Sandelin. Religionsvetenskapliga skrifter 48. Åbo: Åbo Akademi, 99127.Google Scholar
Holmén, Tom 2001. Jesus and Jewish Covenant Thinking. Biblical Interpretation Series 55. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Holmén, Tom 2004. “Jesus, Judaism and the Covenant,” Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus 2.1: 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmén, Tom 2007. “An Introduction to the Continuum Approach,” in Holmén, T. (ed.), Jesus from Judaism to Christianity: Continuum Approaches to the Historical Jesus. Library of New Testament Studies 352. London: T & T Clark, 116.Google Scholar
Hooker, Morna D. 1972. “On Using the Wrong Tool,” Theology 75: 570581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooker, Morna D. 1988. “Traditions about the Temple in the Sayings of Jesus,” Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester 70: 719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooker, Morna D. 1991. A Commentary on the Gospel According to St. Mark. Black’s New Testament Commentaries 2. Peabody: Hendrickson.Google Scholar
Hooker, Morna D. 1994. Not Ashamed of the Gospel. Didsbury Lectures, , 1988. Carlisle: Paternoster.Google Scholar
Hooker, Morna D. 1997. The Signs of a Prophet: The Prophetic Actions of Jesus. London: SCM.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Jamal-Dominique 2011. “The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Greco-Roman World: Examining the Essenes’ View of Sacrifice in Relation to the Scrolls,” in Lange, A., Tov, E., Weigold, M., and Reynolds, B. III (eds.), The Dead Sea Scrolls in Context: Integrating the Dead Sea Scrolls in the Study of Ancient Texts, Languages, and Cultures. 2 vols. Vetus Testamentum Supplements 140. Leiden: Brill: 367383.Google Scholar
Horbury, William 1982. “The Benediction of the Minim and Early Jewish-Christian Controversy,” Journal of Theological Studies 33: 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horbury, William 1984. “The Temple Tax,” in Bammel, E. and Moule, C. F. D (eds.), Jesus and the Politics of His Day. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 265286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horsley, Richard 1984. “Popular Messianic Movements Around the Time of Jesus,” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 46: 471–95.Google Scholar
Horsley, Richard 1987. Jesus and the Spiral of Violence: Popular Jewish Resistance in Roman Palestine. San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Horsley, Richard 1991. “Q and Jesus: Assumptions, Approaches, and Analyses,” Semeia 55: 175209.Google Scholar
Horsley, Richard 2007. Scribes, Visionaries, and the Politics of Second Temple Judea. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar
Horsley, Richard 2012. The Prophet Jesus and the Renewal of Israel: Moving Beyond a Diversionary Debate. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Horsley, Richard and Hanson, John S. 1985. Bandits, Prophets, and Messiahs: Popular Movements in the Time of Jesus. Minneapolis: Winston.Google Scholar
Hort, F. J. A. 1894. Judaistic Christianity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Horvath, Tibor 1979. The Sacrificial Interpretation of Jesus’ Achievement in the New Testament: Historical Development and its Reasons. New York: Philosophical Library, Inc.Google Scholar
Hoskins, Paul M. 2006. Jesus as the Fulfillment of the Temple in the Gospel of John. Milton Keynes: Paternoster.Google Scholar
Hoskyns, E. C. 1947. The Fourth Gospel. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Hubert, Henri and Mauss, Marcel 1964 (1898). Sacrifice: Its Nature and Functions. Translated by Halls, W. D.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hübner, H. 1973. Das Gesetz in der synoptischen Tradition. Witten: Luther.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Jonathan 2012. Eschatology in Genesis. Forschungen zum Alten Testament 2/57. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Hulst, A. R. 1963. “Opmerkingen over de Ka’aser-Zinnen in Deuteronomium,” Nederlands Theologisch Tijdschrift 18: 337–61.Google Scholar
Hultgren, Arland J. 2000. The Parables of Jesus: A Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Humbert, J.-B. 1994. “L’espace sacré à Qumrân: Propositions pour l’archéologie,” Revue biblique 101: 161214.Google Scholar
Hummel, Reinhardt 1966. Die Auseinandersetzung zwischen Kirche und Judentum im Matthäusevangelium. München: Kaiser.Google Scholar
Hurtado, Larry H. 1983. Mark. The New International Biblical Commentary. Peabody: Hendrickson.Google Scholar
Hurtado, Larry H. 2003. Lord Jesus Christ: Devotion to Jesus in Earliest Christianity. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Instone-Brewer, D. 1998. “Nomological Exegesis in Qumran ‘Divorce’ Texts,” Revue de Qumran 18: 561579.
Instone-Brewer, D. 2000. “Jesus’ Old Testament Basis for Monogamy,” in Moyise, S. (ed.), The Old Testament in the New Testament: Essays in Honour of J. L. North. Sheffield Academic Press, 75105.Google Scholar
Irmscher, J. 1992. “The Book of Elchasai,” in Schneelmelcher, W. (ed.), New Testament Apocrypha II: Writings Relating to the Apostles, Apocalypses and Related Subjects. Translated by Wilson, R. McL. Louisville: John Knox Press, 685690.Google Scholar
Jackson, David R. 2004. Enochic Judaism: Three Defining Paradigm Exemplars. Library of Second Temple Studies 49. London: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Jackson-McCabe, Matt (ed.) 2007. Jewish Christianity Reconsidered: Rethinking Ancient Groups and Texts. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Arland D. 1992. The First Gospel: An Introduction to Q. Sonoma: Polebridge.Google Scholar
Jaffee, M. S. 2001. Torah in the Mouth: Writing and Oral Tradition in Palestinian Judaism, 200 BCE-400 CE. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janowski, Brend, Stuhlmacher, Peter, and Bailey, Daniel P. (eds.) 2004. The Suffering Servant: Isaiah 53 in Jewish and Christian Sources. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Janowski, Brend and Stuhlmacher, Peter 1997. Biblische Theologie des Neuen Testaments. Vol. 1: Grundlegung von Jesus zu Paulus. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Jassen, Alex P. 2014. Scripture and Law in the Dead Sea Scrolls. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jay, Nancy 1992. Throughout Your Generations Forever: Sacrifice, Religion, and Paternity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jeremias, J. 1955. The Parables of Jesus. London: SCM.Google Scholar
Jeremias, J. 1966. “Artikellos Χριστός. Zur Ursprache von 1. Kor 15.3b-5,” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 57: 211215.Google Scholar
Jeremias, J. 1971. New Testament Theology. New York: SCM.Google Scholar
Jeremias, J. 1972. The Parables of Jesus. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Jervell, J. 1972. Luke and the People of God: A New Look at Luke-Acts. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
Jewett, R. 1986. The Thessalonian Correspondence. Philadelphia: Fortress.Google Scholar
Johnson, Aaron P. 2013. Religion and Identity in Porphyry of Tyre: The Limits of Hellenism in Late Antiquity. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, F. Stanley 1990. “An Ancient Jewish Christian Rejoinder to Luke’s Acts of the Apostles: Pseudo-Clementine Recognitions 1.27–71,” in Stoops, R. (ed.), Semeia 80: The Apocryphal Acts of the Apostles in Intertextual Perspectives. Atlanta: Scholars, 223245.Google Scholar
Jones, F. Stanley 1995. An Ancient Jewish Christian Source On the History of Christianity: Pseudo-Clementine Recognitions I.27–71. Atlanta: Scholars.Google Scholar
Jones, F. Stanley 2000. “Pseudo-Clementine Literature,” in Schiffman, L. H. and VanderKam, J. C. (eds.), Encyclopedia of the Dead Sea Scrolls. 2 vols. New York: Oxford University Press, 2: 717719.Google Scholar
Jones, F. Stanley 2001. “Jewish-Christian Chiliastic Restoration in Pseudo-Clementine Recognitions 1.27–71,” in Scott, J. M. (ed.), Restoration: Old Testament, Jewish, and Christian Perspectives. Journal for the Study of Judaism 72. Leiden: Brill, 529547.
Jones, F. Stanley 2001. “Hegesippus as a Source for the History of Jewish Christianity,” in Mimouni, S. and Jones, F. S. (eds.), Le judéo-christianisme dans tous ses états. Paris: Cerf, 201212.Google Scholar
Jones, F. Stanley 2004. “The Book of Elchasai in its Relevance for Manichaean Institutions with a Supplement: The Book of Elchasai Reconstructed and Translated,” ARAM 16: 179215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, F. Stanley 2005. “Jewish Christianity of the Pseudo-Clementines,” in Marjanen, A. and Luomanen, P. (eds.), A Companion to Second Century Christian “Heretics.” Leiden: Brill, 315334.Google Scholar
Jones, F. Stanley 2008. “Sonship in Some Early Jewish Christian Traditions.” Occasional Papers of the Institute for Antiquity and Christianity 52. Claremont.
Jones, F. Stanley 2009. “The Genesis of Pseudo-Clementine Christianity.” A paper presented for the Construction of Christian Identities Section at the 2009 Annual Meeting of the Society of Biblical Literature, New Orleans.
Jones, F. Stanley 2012. Pseudoclementina Elchasaiticaque inter Judaeochristiana: Collected Studies. Orientalia Lovaniensia analecta 203. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Joseph, Simon J. 2010. “The Ascetic Jesus,” Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus 8: 146181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Simon J. 2011. “‘Seek His Kingdom’: Q 12,22b-31, God’s Providence, and Adamic Wisdom,” Biblica 92.3: 392410.Google Scholar
Joseph, Simon J. 2012. Jesus, Q, and the Dead Sea Scrolls: A Judaic Approach to Q. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament II.333. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Joseph, Simon J. 2014. The Nonviolent Messiah: Jesus, Q, and the Enochic Tradition. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
Joseph, Simon J. 2014. “‘For Heaven and Earth to Pass Away’? Reexamining Q 16,16–18, Eschatology, and the Law,” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 105/2: 169188.Google Scholar
Juel, D. 1977. Messiah and Temple: The Trial of Jesus in the Gospel of Mark. Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series 31. Missoula: Scholars.Google Scholar
Juel, D. 1983. Luke-Acts: The Promise of History. Atlanta: John Knox.Google Scholar
Juster, Jean 1914. Les Juifs dans l’Empire Romain: leur Condition Juridique, Économique, Sociale. Paris: Paul Geuthner.Google Scholar
Kähler, Martin 1964. The So-Called Historical Jesus and the Historic Biblical Christ. Philadelphia: Fortress.Google Scholar
Kalmin, R. 1994. “Christians and Heretics in Rabbinic Literature of Late Antiquity,” Harvard Theological Review 87: 155169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Käsemann, Ernst 1964. “The Problem of the Historical Jesus,” in Essays on New Testament Themes. Studies in Biblical Theology 41. London: SCM, 1547.Google Scholar
Käsemann, Ernst 1970. “The Pauline Theology of the Cross,” Interpretation 24: 151177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazen, Thomas 2008. “The Christology of Early Christian Practice.” Journal of Biblical Literature, 127.3: 591614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazen, Thomas 2013. Scripture, Interpretation, or Authority? Motives and Arguments in Jesus’ Halakic Conflicts. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 320. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Kazmierski, C. R. 1992. “Evangelist and Leper: A Socio-Cultural Study of Mk 1.40–45,” New Testament Studies 38: 3750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kee, Howard Clark 1975. “The Function of Scriptural Quotations and Allusions in Mark 11–16,” in Ellis, E. Earle and Grässer, Erich (eds.), Jesus und Paulus: Festschrift für Werner Georg Kümmel zum 70. Geburtstag. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck-Ruprecht, 165188.Google Scholar
Keener, Craig S. 2005. 1–2 Corinthians. New Cambridge Bible Commentary. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, Chris 2014. Jesus Against the Scribal Elite: The Origins of the Conflict. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
Kelber, W. H. 1979. Mark’s Story of Jesus. Philadelphia: Fortress.Google Scholar
Kelhoffer, James A. 2005. The Diet of John the Baptist: ‘Locusts and Wild Honey’ in Synoptic and Patristic Interpretation. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 176. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Kelley, Nicole 2005. “Problems of Knowledge and Authority in the Pseudo-Clementine Romance of Recognitions,” Journal of Early Christian Studies 13.3: 315348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Nicole 2006. Knowledge and Religious Authority in the Pseudo-Clementines: Situating the Recognition in Fourth-Century Syria. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament II.213. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Kerr, A. R. 2002. The Temple of Jesus’ Body: The Temple Theme in the Gospel of John. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 220. London: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kertelge, K. (ed.) 1976. Der Tod Jesu. Quaestiones disputatae 74. Freiburg: Herder.Google Scholar
Kieferndorf, Philipp 1921. “Seine Speise war Heuschrecken?Vegetarische Warte 54: 188189.Google Scholar
Kiilunen, Jarmo 1985. Die Vollmacht im Widerstreit: Untersuchungen zum Werdegang von Mk 2,1–3,6. Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae. Diss. Humanarum litterarum 40. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.Google Scholar
Kilgallen, J. J. 1989. “The Function of Stephen’s Speech (Acts 2–53),” Biblica 70: 177181.Google Scholar
King, Karen L. 2003. What is Gnosticism? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kinman, B. 1995. Jesus’ Entry into Jerusalem: In the Context of Lukan Theology and the Politics of His Day. Arbeiten zur Geschichte des antiken Judentums und des Urchristentums 28. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Kirk, Alan 1998. The Composition of the Sayings Source: Genre, Synchrony, and Wisdom Redaction in Q. Novum Testamentum Supplements 91. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Kirk, Alan 2005. “The Memory of Violence and the Death of Jesus in Q,” in A. Kirk and T. Thatcher (eds.), Memory, Tradition, and Text: Uses of the Past in Early Christianity. Semeia Studies 52. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 191–206.
Kister, M. 2009. “Divorce, Reproof, and Other Sayings in the Synoptic Gospels: Jesus Traditions in the Context of ‘Qumranic’ and Other Texts,” in Clements, R. A. and Schwartz, D. R. (eds.), Text, Thought, and Practice in Qumran and Early Christianity: Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium of the Orion Center for the Study of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Associated Literature, Jointly Sponsored by the Hebrew University Center for the Study of Christianity, 11–12 January, 2004. Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah 84. Leiden: Brill, 195229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kister, Menahem 1999. “Studies in 4Miqsat Ma’aseh ha-Torah” and Related Texts: Law, Theology, Language and Calendar,” Tarbiz 68.3: 317372.Google Scholar
Kiuchi, N. 1987. The Purification Offering in the Priestly Literature: Its Meaning and Function. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
Klawans, Jonathan 2002. “Interpreting the Last Supper: Sacrifice, Spiritualization, and Anti-Sacrifice,” New Testament Studies 48: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klawans, Jonathan 2005. Purity, Sacrifice, and the Temple: Symbolism and Supersessionism in the Study of Ancient Judaism. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klijn, A. F. J. 1974. “The Study of Jewish Christianity,” New Testament Studies 20: 419431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klijn, A. F. J. 1992. Jewish-Christian Gospel Tradition. Vigiliae christianae: Supplements Series 17. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Klijn, A. F. J. and Reinink, G. J. 1974. “Elchasai and Mani,” Vigiliae christianae 28: 277289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klinghardt, M. 1988. Gesetz und Volk Gottes: Das lukanische Verständnis des Gesetzes nach Herkunft, Funktion und seinem Ort in der Geschichte des Urchristentums. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament II.32. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Klinzing, Georg 1971. Die Umdeutung des Kultus in der Qumrangemeinde und im Neuen Testament. Studien zur Umwelt des Neuen Testaments 7. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Kloppenborg, John S. 1978. “An Analysis of the Pre-Pauline Formula in 1 Cor 15:3b-5 in Light of Some Recent Literature,” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 40.3: 351357.Google Scholar
Kloppenborg, John S. 1986. “The Function of Apocalyptic Language in Q,” in Society of Biblical Literature Seminar Papers 25. Atlanta: Scholars, 224235.Google Scholar
Kloppenborg, John S. 1987. “Symbolic Eschatology and the Apocalypticism of Q,” Harvard Theological Review 80.3: 287306.Google Scholar
Kloppenborg, John S. 1987. The Formation of Q: Trajectories in Ancient Christian Wisdom Collections. Philadelphia: Fortress.Google Scholar
Kloppenborg, John S. 1990. “Nomos and Ethos in Q,” in Goehring, J. E., J. T. Sanders, and C. W. Hedrick (eds.), Gospel Origins and Christian Beginnings: In Honor of James M. Robinson. Sonoma: Polebridge, 3548.Google Scholar
Kloppenborg, John S. 1990. “Alms, Debt and Divorce: Jesus’ Ethics in their Mediterranean Context,” Toronto Journal of Theology 6: 182200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kloppenborg, John S. 1991. “City and Wasteland: Narrative World and the Beginning of the Sayings Gospel (Q),” Semeia 52: 145160.Google Scholar
Kloppenborg, John S. 1993. “The Sayings Gospel Q: Recent Opinion on the People behind the Document,” Currents in Research: Biblical Studies 1: 9–34.Google Scholar
Kloppenborg, John S. 1996. “The Sayings Gospel Q and the Quest of the Historical Jesus,” Harvard Theological Review 89: 307–44.Google Scholar
Kloppenborg, John S. 2001. “Discursive Practices in the Sayings Gospel Q and the Quest of the Historical Jesus,” in Lindemann, A. (ed.), The Sayings Source Q and the Historical Jesus. Bibliotheca ephemeridum theologicarum lovaniensium 158. Leuven: Peeters, 149190.Google Scholar
Kloppenborg, John S. 2002. “Preface,” in Han, Kyu Sam, Jerusalem and the Early Jesus Movement: The Q Community’s Attitude Toward the Temple. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplements Series 207. Sheffield Academic Press, 78.Google Scholar
Kloppenborg, John S. 2006. The Tenants in the Vineyard: Ideology, Economics, and Agrarian Conflict in Jewish Palestine. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 195. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Kloppenborg, John S. 2014. “A New Synoptic Problem: Mark Goodacre and Simon Gathercole on Thomas,” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 36/3: 199239.Google Scholar
Kloppenborg Verbin, John S. 2000. Excavating Q: The History and Setting of the Sayings Gospel. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Kloppenborg Verbin, John S. 2000. “Isaiah 5:1–7, the Parable of the Tenants, and Vineyard Leases on Papyrus,” in Wilson, S. G. and Desjardins, M. (eds.), Text and Artifact: Religions in Mediterranean Antiquity: Essays in Honor of Peter Richardson. Studies in Christianity and Judaism 9. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 111134.Google Scholar
Kloppenborg Verbin, John S. 2002. “Egyptian Viticultural Practices and the Citation of Isa 5:1–7 in Mark 12:1–9,” Novum Testamentum 44: 134159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kloppenborg Verbin, John S. 2004. “Isa 5:1–7 LXX and Mark 12:1, 9, Again,” Novum Testamentum 46: 1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knibb, Michael A. 1987. The Qumran Community. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knust, Jennifer W. and Várhelyi, Zsuzsanna (eds.) 2011. Ancient Mediterranean Sacrifice. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, G. A. 1976. “A Critical Investigation of Epiphanius’ Knowledge of the Ebionites: A Translation and Critical Discussion of Panarion 30.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania Press.
Koch, K. 1966. “Sühne und Sündenvergebung um die Wende von der exilischen zur nachexilischen Zeit,” Evangelische Theologie 26: 217239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koester, Helmut 1983. “Three Thomas Parables,” in Logan, A. H. B. and Wedderburn, A. J. M. (eds.), The New Testament and Gnosis: Essays in Honor of Robert McL. Wilson. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 195203.Google Scholar
Koester, Helmut 1990. Ancient Christian Gospels: Their History and Development. Philadelphia: Fortress.Google Scholar
Koester, Helmut 2000. History and Literature of Early Christianity. 2nd edn. New York: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosch, Daniel 1985. Die Gottesherrschaft im Zeichen des Widerspruchs. Traditions- und redaktionsgeschichtliche Untersuchung von Lk 16,16/Mt 11,12 bei Jesus, Q und Lukas. Europäische Hochschulschriften 23/257. Bern; New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kosch, Daniel 1989. Die eschatologische Tora des Menschensohnes: Untersuchungen zur Rezeption der Stellung Jesu zur Tora in Q. Novum Testamentum et Orbis Antiquus 12. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosch, Daniel 1992. “Q und Jesus,” Biblische Zeitschrift 36: 3058.Google Scholar
Kotila, M. 1988. Umstrittene Zeuge. Studien zur Stellung des Gesetzes in der johanneischen Theologiegeschichte. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.Google Scholar
Kraft, R. A. 1972. “In Search of ‘Jewish Christianity’ and its ‘Theology’: Problems of Definition and Methodology,” Recherches de Science Religieuse 60: 8192.Google Scholar
Kramer, W. 1966. Christ, Lord, Son of God. Studies in Biblical Theology 50. London: SCM.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Heinz-Wolfgang 1982. “Die Kreuzesstrafe während der frühen Kaiserzeit. Ihre Wirklichkeit und Wertung in der Umwelt des Urchristentums,” ANRW II.25.1: 648793.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Heinz-Wolfgang 2002. “The Qumran Meal and the Lord’s Supper in Paul in the Context of the Graeco-Roman World,” in Christophersen, A. (ed.), Paul, Luke and the Graeco-Roman World: Essays in Honour of Alexander J. M. Wedderburn. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 217. London: Sheffield Academic Press, 221248.Google Scholar
Kuhn, K. G. 1958. “The Last Supper and the Communal Meal of Qumran,” in The Scrolls and the New Testament. London: SCM, 6593.Google Scholar
Laato, Antti 2012. Who Is the Servant of the Lord? Jewish and Christian Interpretations on Isaiah 53 From Antiquity to the Middle Ages. Studies in Rewritten Bible 4. Turku: Åbo Akademi University; Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Lachs, Samuel Tobias 1987. A Rabbinic Commentary on the New Testament: The Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke. Hoboken: Ktav; New York: Anti-Defamation League of B’Nai Brith.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Jan 1981. Once More Astonished: The Parables of Jesus. New York: Crossroad.Google Scholar
Lampe, G. W. H. 1981. “Martyrdom and Inspiration,” in Horbury, W. (ed.), Suffering and Martyrdom in the New Testament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 118135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanci, John R. 1997. A New Temple for Corinth: Rhetorical and Archaeological Approaches to Pauline Imagery. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lang, Bernhard 1997. Sacred Games: A History of Christian Worship. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lange, John 1966. “The Argument from Silence,” History and Theology 5: 288301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlois, Charles Victor and Seignobos, Charles 1904. Introduction to the Study of History. Translated by Berry, G. G.. New York: Henry Holt and Co..Google Scholar
Larsson, Edvin 1993. “Temple-Criticism and the Jewish Heritage: Some Reflections on Acts 6–7,” New Testament Studies 39: 379395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Déaut, R. 1974. “Le Targumic Literature and New Testament Interpretation,” Biblical Theology Bulletin 4: 243289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Donne, Anthony 2009. The Historiographical Jesus: Memory, Typology, and the Son of David. Waco: Baylor.
Lefebure, Leo D. 2000. Revelation, the Religious, and Violence. Maryknoll: Orbis.Google Scholar
Légasse, Simon 1997. The Trial of Jesus. Translated by Bowden, John. London: SCM.Google Scholar
Lémonon, J.-P. 1981. Pilate et le gouvernement de la Judée. Paris: Gabalda.Google Scholar
Leonhardt, Jutta 2001. Jewish Worship in Philo of Alexandria. Texts and Studies in Ancient Judaism 84. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Levenson, Jon D. 1984. “The Temple and the World,” Journal of Religion 64: 275298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levenson, Jon D. 1993. The Death and Resurrection of the Beloved Son: The Transformation of Child Sacrifice in Judaism and Christianity. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Levine, Amy-Jill 1988. The Social and Ethnic Dimensions of Matthean Salvation History: “Go nowhere among the Gentiles ...” (Matt. 10:5b). Studies in the Bible and Early Christianity 14. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen.Google Scholar
Levine, Amy-Jill 2000. “Jesus, Divorce, and Sexuality: A Jewish Critique,” in le Beau, B. F., L. Greenspoon, and D. Hamm (eds.), The Historical Jesus through Catholic and Jewish Eyes. Harrisburg: Trinity, 113129.Google Scholar
Levine, Amy-Jill 2014. Review of Patrick Oliver, Torah Praxis after 70 CE. Reviews of the Enoch Seminar. Retrieved from www.enochseminar.org.
Levine, Baruch A. 1968. “On the Presence of God in Biblical Religion,” in Jacob Neusner (ed.), Religions in Antiquity: Essays in Memory of Erwin Ramsdell Goodenough. Leiden: Brill, 7187.Google Scholar
Levine, Baruch A. 1974. In the Presence of the LORD: A Study of the Cult and Some Cultic Terms in Ancient Israel. Studies in Judaism in Late Antiquity. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Levinson, Bernard M. 2008. Legal Revision and Religious Renewal in Ancient Israel. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsey, E. Duane 1985. The Servant Songs: A Study in Isaiah. Chicago: Moody Press.Google Scholar
Lietzmann, H. 1953–1979 (1926). Mass and Lord’s Supper: A Study in the History of the Liturgy. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Lindars, B. 1972. The Gospel of John. New Century Bible Commentary 25. London: Oliphants.Google Scholar
Linzey, Andrew 2003. “The Bible and Killing for Food,” in Armstrong, S. J. and Botzler, R. G. (eds.), The Animal Ethics Reader. London: Routledge, 227234.Google Scholar
Loader, William R. G. 2002. Jesus’ Attitude towards the Law: A Study of the Gospels. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Loader, William R. G. 2004. The Septuagint, Sexuality, and the New Testament: Case Studies on the Impact of the LXX in Philo and the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Loader, William R. G. 2011. “Attitudes to Judaism and the Law and Synoptic Relations,” in Foster, P., A. Gregory, and J. S. Kloppenborg (eds.), New Studies in the Synoptic Problem Oxford Conference, April 2008. Bibliotheca ephemeridum theologicarum lovaniensium 239. Leuven: Peeters, 347369.Google Scholar
Lohse, E. 2008. “Christus, des Gesetzes Ende? Die Theologie des Apostels Paulus in kritischer Perspektive,” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 99: 1832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longenecker, R. N. 1970. The Christology of Early Jewish Christianity. Studies in Biblical Theology 2/17. London: SCM.Google Scholar
Longenecker, R. N. 1983. “Jews, Hebrews and Christians: Some Needed Distinctions,” Novum Testamentum 24: 194208.Google Scholar
Lüdemann, Gerd 1989. Opposition to Paul in Jewish Christianity. Translated by Boring, M. Eugene. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
Lüdemann, Gerd 1989. Early Christianity according to the Traditions in Acts: A Commentary. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
Lüdemann, Gerd 1996. Heretics: The Other Side of Early Christianity. Translated by Bowden, John. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar
Lüdemann, Gerd 2001. Jesus After 2000 Years: What He Really Said and Did. Amherst: Prometheus.Google Scholar
Lührmann, Dieter 1969. Die Redaktion der Logienquelle. Wissenschaftliche Monographien zum Alten und Neuen Testament 33. Neukirchener-Vluyn: Neukirchener.Google Scholar
Lührmann, Dieter 1981. “Markus 14, 55–64: Christologie und Zerstörung des Tempels im Markusevangelium,” New Testament Studies 27: 457474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundquist, John M. 1984. “The Common Temple Ideology of the Ancient Near East,” in Madsen, T. G. (ed.), The Temple in Antiquity: Ancient Records and Modern Perspectives. Provo: Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young University, 5376.Google Scholar
Luomanen, Petri 2012. Recovering Jewish Christian Sects and Gospels. Vigiliae christianae Supplements 110. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Luttikhuizen, Gerard P. 1985. The Revelation of Elchasai: Investigations into the Evidence for a Mesopotamian Jewish Apocalypse of the Second Century and its Reception by Judeo-Christian Propagandists. Texte und Studien zum antiken Judentum 8. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Luz, Ulrich 2002. “Warum zog Jesus nach Jerusalem?” in Schröter, J. and Brucker, R. (eds.), Der historische Jesus. Edited by. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 114. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 409427.Google Scholar
Maccoby, Hyam 1987. The Mythmaker: Paul and the Invention of Christianity. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
MacGreggor, G. H. C. 1961. “The Concept of the Wrath of God in the New Testament,” New Testament Studies 7: 101109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, Burton L. 1987. “Introduction: Religion and Ritual,” in Hamerton-Kelly, R. (ed.), Violent Origins: Ritual Killing and Cultural Formation. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 170.Google Scholar
Mack, Burton L. 1988. A Myth of Innocence: Mark and Christian Origins. Philadelphia: Fortress.Google Scholar
Magness, Jodi 2003. The Archaeology of Qumran and the Dead Sea Scrolls. Studies in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Related Literature. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Maier, Johann 1982. Jüdische Auseinandersetzung mit dem Christentum in der Antike. Erträge der Forschung 177. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Maimonides, 1956. Guide to the Perplexed. Translated by Friedlander, M.. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Majumdar, Ramesh Chandra (ed.) 1951. The History and Culture of the Indian People. Vol. 1: The Vedic Age. Bombay [Mumbai]: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan.Google Scholar
Malina, B. J. 1976. “Jewish Christianity or Christian Judaism: Toward a Hypothetical Definition,” Journal for the Study of Judaism 7: 4657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, C. S. 1986. Mark. Anchor Bible. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Manson, T. W. 1943. Jesus the Messiah. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Manson, T. W. 1953. The Servant-Messiah. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, Joel 1992. The Way of the Lord: Christological Exegesis of the Old Testament in the Gospel of Mark. Louisville: John Knox Westminster.Google Scholar
Marcus, Joel 1995. “The Old Testament and the Death of Jesus: The Role of Scripture in the Gospel Passion Narratives,” in Carroll, John T. and Green, Joel B. (eds.), The Death of Jesus in Early Christianity. Peabody: Hendrickson, 205233.Google Scholar
Marcus, Joel 2000. Mark 1–8: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. Anchor Bible 27. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Marcus, Joel 2000. “Mark – Interpreter of Paul,” New Testament Studies 46: 473487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Dale B. 2014. “Jesus in Jerusalem: Armed and Not Dangerous,” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 37/1: 324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Dale B. 2015. “Response to Downing and Fredriksen,” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 37.3: 334345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Ralph 1967. Carmen Christi: Philippians ii.5–11 in Recent Interpretation and in the Setting of Early Christian Worship. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martyn, J. L. 1977. “Clementine Recognitions 1,33–71, Jewish Christianity, and the Fourth Gospel,” in Jervell, J. and Meeks, W. A. (eds.), God’s Christ and His People: Studies in Honour of Nils Alstrup Dahl. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 265295.Google Scholar
Marx, Alfred 2005. Les systèmes sacrificiels de l’Ancien Testament: Formes et fonctions du culte sacrificiel à Yhwh. Vetus Testamentum Supplements 105. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marxsen, Willi 1970. The Lord’s Supper As a Christological Problem. Translated by Nieting, Lorenz. Philadelphia: Fortress.Google Scholar
Marxsen, Willi 1992. “The Meals of Jesus and the Lord’s Supper of the Church,” in Jesus and the Church. Translated by Devenish, P. I.. New York: Trinity, 137146.Google Scholar
Mason, Steve 1992. Josephus and the New Testament. Peabody: Hendrickson.Google Scholar
Mason, Steve 2009. Josephus, Judea and Christian Origins: Methods and Categories. Peabody: Hendrickson.Google Scholar
Massaux, Édouard 1950. Influence de l’Évangile de saint Matthieu sur la littérature chrétienne avant saint Irénée. Universitas Catholica Lovaniensis 2.42. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Matson, Mark A. 1992. “The Contribution to the Temple Cleansing by the Fourth Gospel,” in Lovering, E. H. (ed.), Society of Biblical Literature 1992 Seminar Papers. Society of Biblical Literature Seminar Papers 31. Atlanta: Scholars, 489506.Google Scholar
Matthews, Kenneth A. 1988. “John, Jesus and the Essenes: Trouble at the Temple,” Criswell Theological Review 3.1: 101126.Google Scholar
McClymond, Kathryn 2008. Beyond Sacred Violence: A Comparative Study of Sacrifice. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
McGowan, Andrew 2012. “Eucharist and Sacrifice: Cultic Tradition and Transformation in Early Christian Ritual Meals,” in Klinghardt, M. and Taussig, H. (eds.), Mahl und religiöse Identität im frühen Christentum. Meals and Religious Identity in Early Christianity. Tübingen: Francke, 191206.Google Scholar
McGrew, Timothy J. 2013. “The Argument from Silence,” Acta Analytica 29.2: 215228.Google Scholar
McGuckin, J. A. 1989. “Sacrifice and Atonement: An Investigation into the Attitude of Jesus of Nazareth towards Cultic Sacrifice,” in Bauer, Y., A. Eckardt, F. H. Littell, D. Patterson, E. Maxwell, and R. Maxwell (eds.), Remembering for the Future: Working Papers and Addenda; Volume 1: Jews and Christians During and After the Holocaust. 3 vols. Oxford: Pergamon, 1: 548661.Google Scholar
McHugh, John 2009. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on John 1–4. International Critical Commentary on the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
McKelvey, R. J. 1969. New Temple: The Church in the New Testament. Old Testament Message. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McKenna, Andrew J. 1991. Violence and Difference: Girard, Derrida, and Deconstruction. Urbana: University of Illionis Press.Google Scholar
McKnight, Scot 2005. Jesus and His Death: Historiography, the Historical Jesus, and Atonement Theory. Waco: Baylor University Press.Google Scholar
McLean, Bradley H. 1992. “The Absence of an Atoning Sacrifice in Paul’s Soteriology,” New Testament Studies 38: 531553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, Bradley H. 1996. The Cursed Christ: Mediterranean Expulsion Rituals and Pauline Soteriology. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplements Series 126. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mealand, David L. 1978. “The Dissimilarity Test,” Scottish Journal of Theology 31: 4150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, John P. 1990. “Jesus in Josephus, a Modest Proposal,” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 52: 76103.Google Scholar
Meier, John P. 1991. A Marginal Jew: Rethinking the Historical Jesus. Vol. 1: The Roots of the Problem of the Person. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Meier, John P. 1994. A Marginal Jew: Rethinking the Historical Jesus. Vol. 2: Mentor, Message, and Miracles. ABRL. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Meier, John P. 2001. A Marginal Jew: Rethinking the Historical Jesus. Vol. 3: Companions and Competitors. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Meier, John P. 2003. “The Historical Jesus and the Historical Law: Some Problems within the Problem,” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 65: 5279.Google Scholar
Meier, John P. 2009. A Marginal Jew: Rethinking the Historical Jesus. Vol. 4: Law and Love. Anchor Bible Reference Library. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mendenhall, G. E. and Herion, G. A. 1992. “Covenant,” Anchor Bible Dictionary 1: 11791202.Google Scholar
Merklein, H. 1978. Die Gottesherrschaft als Handlungsprinzip. Untersuchung zur Ethik Jesu. Forschung zur Bibel 34. Würzburg: Echter.Google Scholar
Merklein, H. 1989. Jesu Botschaft von de Gottesherrschaft. Eine Skizze. 3rd edn. Stuttgart: Katholisches Bibelwerk.Google Scholar
Mermelstein, Ari 2014. Creation, Covenant, and the Beginnings of Judaism: Reconceiving Historical Time in the Second Temple Period. Journal for the Study of Judaism: Supplements Series 168. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Meshorer, Yaakov 1984. “One Hundred Ninety Years of Tyrian Shekels,” in Houghton, A., L. Mildenberg, and A. A. Houghton (eds.), Festschrift für/Studies in Honor of Leo Mildenberg. Wetteren: Editions NR, 171191.Google Scholar
Mettinger, Tryggve N. D. 1983. A Farewell to the Servant Songs: A Critical Examination of the Exegetical Axiom. Lund: C. W. K. Gleerup.Google Scholar
Metzner, Rainer 2010. Kaiphas. Der Hohepriester jenes Jahres. Geschichte und Deutung. Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity 75. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Ben F. 1979. The Aims of Jesus. London: SCM.Google Scholar
Meyer, P. D. 1967. “The Community of Q.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Iowa.
Milgrom, Jacob 1971. “A Prolegomenon to Leviticus 17:11,” Journal of Biblical Literature 90: 149–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgrom, Jacob 1971. “Sin Offering or Purification Offering?Vetus Testamentum 21: 237239.Google Scholar
Milgrom, Jacob 1976. “Profane Slaughter and the Composition of Deuteronomy,” Hebrew Union College Annual 47: 1–17.Google Scholar
Milgrom, Jacob 1976. Cult and Conscience: The Asham and the Priestly Doctrine of Repentance. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Milgrom, Jacob 1983. Studies in Cultic Theology and Terminology. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Milgrom, Jacob 1992. Leviticus 1–16: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. Anchor Bible 3. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Milgrom, Jacob 2002. Pesharim, Other Commentaries, and Related Documents. J. H. Charlesworth (ed.), Princeton Theological Seminary Dead Sea Scrolls Project 6B. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar
Mimouni, Simon Claude 1997. “La ‘Birkat ha-minim’: Une prière juive contre les judéo-chrétiens,” Recherches de science religieuse 71: 275298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mimouni, Simon Claude 1998. Le Judéo-christianisme ancien: Essais historiques. Série Patrimoines. Paris: Cerf.Google Scholar
Mimouni, Simon Claude 2006. Les fragments évangéliques Judéo-chrétiens “apocryphisés”: Recherches et perspectives. Cahiers de la Revue biblique 66. Paris: Gabalda.Google Scholar
Mimouni, Simon Claude 2012. Early Judaeo-Christianity: Historical Essays. Interdisciplinary Studies in Ancient Culture and Religion 13. Translated by Fréchet, R.. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Mimouni, Simon Claude and Jones, F. S. (eds.) 2001. Le Judéo-Christianisme dans tous ses états: acts du colloque de Jérusalem 6–10 Juillet 1998. Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar
Montefiore, Hugh 1962. “A Comparison of the Parables of the Gospel according to Thomas and the Synoptic Gospels,” in Turner, H. E. W. and Montefiore, H. (eds.), Thomas and the Evangelists. Studies in Biblical Theology 35. Naperville: Alec R. Allenson, 455465.Google Scholar
Montefiore, Hugh 1965. “Jesus and the Temple Tax,” New Testament Studies 10: 6071.Google Scholar
Moo, Douglas J. 1983. The Old Testament in the Gospel Passion Narratives. Sheffield: Almond.Google Scholar
Morris, Leon 1962. The Cross in the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Muddiman, John 2009. “The Triumphal Entry and Cleansing of the Temple (Mark 11.1–17 and Parallels): a Jewish Festival Setting?” in Tuckett, C. M. (ed.), Feast and Festivals. Contributions to Biblical Exegesis and Theology 53. Leuven: Peeters, 7786.Google Scholar
Mueller, J. R. 1980. “The Temple Scroll and the Gospel Divorce Texts,” Revue de Qumran 10: 247256.Google Scholar
Müller, K. 1986. “Gesetz und Gesetzeserfüllung im Frühjudentum,” in Kertelge, K. (ed.), Das Gesetz im Neuen Testament. Freiburg: Herder, 1127.Google Scholar
Müller, K. 2000. “Forschungsgeschichtliche Anmerkungen zum Thema ‘Jesus von Nazareth und das Gesetz’: Versuch einer Zwischenbilanz,” Kirche und Volk Gottes. FS. Jürgen Roloff. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener, 5877.Google Scholar
Munck, Johannes 1960. “Jewish Christianity in Post-Apostolic Times,” New Testament Studies 6, 103116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munck, Johannes 1965. “Primitive Jewish Christianity and Later Jewish Christianity: Continuation or Rupture?” in Aspects du Judéo-Christianisme: Colloque de Strasbourg 23–25 avril 1964. Université de Strasbourg, Centre de recherches d’histoire des religions. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 7793.Google Scholar
Münderlein, Gerhard 1963. “Die Verfluchung Des Feigenbaumes (Mk. XI.12–14),” New Testament Studies 10/1: 89104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy O’Connor, Jerome 1970. “An Essene Missionary Document? CD II, 4–VI, 1,” Revue Biblique 77: 201229.Google Scholar
Murphy O’Connor, Jerome 1981. “Tradition and Redaction in 1 Cor 15:3–7,” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 43.4: 582589.Google Scholar
Murphy O’Connor, Jerome 2000. “Jesus and the Money Changers (Mark 11:15–17; John 2:13–17),” Revue Biblique 107: 4255.Google Scholar
Murry, R. 1974. “Defining Judaeo-Christianity,” Heythrop 15: 303310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murry, R. 1982. “Jews, Hebrews and Christians: Some Needed Distinctions,” Novum Testamentum 24: 194208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, C. 1988. Binding the Strong Man: A Political Reading of Mark’s Story of Jesus. Maryknoll: Orbis.Google Scholar
Myllykoski, Matti 2007. “James the Just in History and Tradition: Perspectives of Past and Present Scholarship (Part II),” Currents in Biblical Research 6: 1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naiden, F.S. 2013. Smoke Signals for the Gods: Ancient Greek Sacrifice from the Archaic through Roman Periods. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Najman, Hindy 1999. “Interpretation as Primordial Writing: Jubilees and Its Authority Conferring Strategies,” Journal for the Study of Judaism 30: 379410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Najman, Hindy 2009. “Reconsidering Jubilees: Prophecy and Exemplarity,” in Boccaccini, G. and Ibba, G. (eds.), Enoch and the Mosaic Torah: The Evidence of Jubilees. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 229243.Google Scholar
Nanos, Mark D. 1996. The Mystery of Romans. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
Nanos, Mark D. 2002. The Irony of Galatians: Paul’s Letter in First-Century Context. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
Nasrallah, Laura 2011. “The Embarrassment of Blood: Early Christians and Others on Sacrifice, War, and Rational Worship,” in Knust, Jennifer W. and Várhelyi, Zsuzsanna (eds.), Ancient Meditteranean Sacrifice. New York: Oxford University Press, 142166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neufeld, Thomas R. Yoder 2011. Killing Enmity: Violence and the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
Neusner, Jacob 1976. “First Cleanse the Inside,” New Testament Studies 22.4: 486495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neusner, Jacob 1989. “Money-Changers in the Temple: The Mishnah’s Explanation,” New Testament Studies 35: 287290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Louis E. 1989. “Law, Virtue and Supererogation in the Halakha: The Problem of ‘Lifnim Mishurat Hadin’ Reconsidered,” Journal of Jewish Studies 40/1: 6188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickelsburg, George W. E. 1999. “The Nature and Function of Revelation in 1 Enoch, Jubilees, and Some Qumranic Documents,” in Chazon, E. G. and Stone, M. (eds.), Pseudepigraphic Perspectives: The Apocrypha and Pseudeipgrapha in Light of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah 31. Leiden: Brill, 92120.Google Scholar
Nickelsburg, George W. E. 2001. 1 Enoch: A Commentary on the Book of 1 Enoch. Hermeneia. Philadelphia: Fortress.Google Scholar
Nickelsburg, George W. E. 2003. Ancient Judaism and Christian Origins: Diversity, Continuity, and Transformation. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
Nineham, D. E. 1963. The Gospel of St. Mark. Pelican New Testament Commentaries. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Nolland, John 2005. The Gospel of Matthew. The New International Greek Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Nolland, John 2008. “The King as Shepherd: The Role of Deutero-Zechariah in Matthew,” in Hatina, T. R. (ed.), Biblical Interpretation in Early Christian Gospels. Volume 2: The Gospel of Matthew. London: T & T Clark International, 133146.Google Scholar
Noland, John 1718. Nazarenus: Or, Jewish, Gentile, and Mahometan Christianity. 2nd edn. London: J. Brotherton, J. Roberts, and A. Dodd.Google Scholar
North, Christopher Richard 1948. The Suffering Servant in Deutero-Isaiah: An Historical and Critical Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Leary, A. M. 2006. Matthew’s Judaization of Mark: Examined in the Context of the Use of Sources in Graeco-Roman Antiquity. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplements Series 323. London: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Och, Bernard 2014. “Creation and Redemption: Toward a Theology of Creation,” in Morales, L. Michael (ed.), Cult and Cosmos: Tilting toward a Temple-Centered Theology. Biblical Tools and Studies 18. Leuven: Peeters, 331350.Google Scholar
Oliver, Isaac W. 2013. Torah Praxis after 70 CE: Reading Matthew and Luke-Acts as Jewish Texts. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament II.355. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Olson, Daniel C. 2013. A New Reading of the Animal Apocalypse of 1 Enoch: “All Nations Shall Be Blessed”: With A New Translation and Commentary. Studia in Veteris Testamenti Pseudepigrapha 24. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Origen, 1965. Contra Celsum. Translated by Chadwick, Henry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ottenheijm, Eric 2014. “‘So the Sons are Free’: The Temple Tax in the Matthean Community,” in Houtman, A., Poorthuis, M., Schwartz, J., and Turner, Y. (eds.), The Actuality of Sacrifice: Past and Present. Jewish and Christian Perspectives 28. Leiden: Brill, 7188.Google Scholar
Overman, J. A. 1990. Matthew’s Gospel and Formative Judaism: The Social World of the Matthean Community. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
Paesler, Kurt 1999. Das Tempelwort Jesu. Die Traditionen von Tempelzerstōrung und Tempelerneuerung im Neuen Testament. Forschungen zur Religion und Literatur des Alten und Neuen Testaments 184. Gōttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paget, James Carleton 2001. “Some Observations on Josephus and Christianity,” Journal of Theological Studies 52.2: 539624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paget, James Carleton 2010. Jews, Christians, and Jewish Christians in Antiquity. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 251. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Painter, John 1997. Mark’s Gospel: Worlds in Conflict. New Testament Readings. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Painter, John 1997. Just James: The Brother of Jesus in History and Tradition. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Pallis, Alexander 1903. A Few Notes on the Gospels according to St. Mark and St. Matthew: Based Chiefly on Modern Greek. Liverpool: Liverpool Booksellers.Google Scholar
Palmer, D. W. 1975. “To Die is Gain,” Novum Testamentum 17: 203218.Google Scholar
Pancaro, S. 1975. The Law in the Fourth Gospel: The Torah and the Gospel, Moses and Jesus, Judaism and Chrsitianity according to John. Novum Testamentum Supplements 42. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Patai, Raphael 1947. Man and Temple in Ancient Jewish Myth and Ritual. London: Thomas Nelson.Google Scholar
Pate, C. Marvin and Kennard, Douglas W. 2005. Deliverance Now and Not Yet: The New Testament and the Great Tribulation. Studies in Biblical Literature 54. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Patte, D. 1987. The Gospel According to Matthew: A Structural Commentary on Matthew’s Faith. Philadelphia: Fortress.Google Scholar
Patterson, Stephen J. 1993. The Gospel of Thomas and Jesus. Sonoma: Polebridge.Google Scholar
Penella, Robert J. (ed.) 1979. The Letters of Apollonius of Tyana: A Critical Text with Prolegomena, Translation and Commentary. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Perkins, Pheme 1981. Hearing the Parables of Jesus. New York: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
Perrin, Nicholas 2010. Jesus the Temple. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
Perrin, Norman 1967. Rediscovering the Teaching of Jesus. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Perrin, Norman 1974. The New Testament: An Introduction: Proclamation and Parenesis, Myth and History. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Pervo, Richard I. 1987. Profit With Delight: The Literary Genre of the Acts of the Apostles. Philadelphia: Fortress.Google Scholar
Pesch, Rudolf 1986. Die Apostelgeschichte I. Evangelisch-katholischer Kommentar zum Neuen Testament 5. Zürich: Benziger.Google Scholar
Pesch, Rudolf 1977. Das Markusevangelium. 2 vols. Herders theologischer Kommentar zum Neuen Testament 2. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder.Google Scholar
Petersen, William L. 1997. “From Justin to Pepys: The History of the Harminonised Gospel Tradition,” Studia Patristica 30: 7196.Google Scholar
Petersen, William L. 2001. “Constructing the Matrix of Judaic Christianity from Texts,” in Jones, F. S. and Mimouni, S. C. (eds.), Le Judéo-Christianisme dans tous ses états: acts du colloque de Jérusalem 6–10 Juillet 1998. Paris: Cerf, 126145.Google Scholar
Peterson, David 2004. “The New Temple: Christology and Ecclesiology in Ephesians and 1 Peter,” in Alexander, T. D. and Gathercole, S. (eds.), Heaven on Earth: The Temple in Biblical Theology. Carlisle: Paternoster, 161176.Google Scholar
Petropolou, Maria-Zoe 2008. Animal Sacrifice in Ancient Greek Religion, Judaism, and Christianity, 100 BC-AD 200. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pobee, John 1985. Persecution and Martyrdom in the Theology of Paul. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplements Series 6. Sheffield: JSOT.Google Scholar
Porphyry, 2000. On Abstinence from Killing Animals. Translated by Clark, Gillian. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Pounds, Brian 2015. “The Crucifiable Jesus.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge.
Porter, Anne and Schwartz, Glenn M. (eds.) 2012. Sacred Killing: The Archaeology of Sacrifice in the Ancient Near East. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Powery, E. B. 2003. Jesus Reads Scripture: The Function of Jesus’ Use of Scripture in the Synoptic Gospels. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Pratscher, W. 1987. Der Herrenbruder Jakobus und die Jakobustradition. Forschungen zur Religion und Literatur des Alten und Neuen Testaments 139. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prescendi, Francesca 2007. Décrire et comprendre le sacrifice. Les réflexions des Romains sur leur propre religion à partir de la littérature antiquaire. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Quispel, Gilles 1957. “The Gospel of Thomas and the New Testament,” Vigiliae christianae 11: 205206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahner, J. 1998. Er aber sprach vom Tempel seines Leibes. Jesus von Nazaret als Ort der Offenbarung Gottes im vierten Evangelium. Bonner biblische Beiträge 117. Bodenheim: Philo.Google Scholar
Räisänen, Heikki 1987. Paul and the Law. 2nd edn. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Räisänen, Heikki 1992. Jesus, Paul and Torah: Collected Essays. Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplements 43. Sheffield: JSOT.Google Scholar
Reasoner, Mark 1999. The Strong and the Weak: Romans 14.1–15.13 in Context. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 103. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Redekop, Vern Neufeld and Ryba, Thomas (eds.) 2014. René Girard and Creative Mimesis. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Redman, Judith C. S. 2010. “How Accurate are Eyewitnesses? Bauckham and the Eyewitnesses in the Light of Psychological Research,” Journal of Biblical Literature, 129, 177197.CrossRef
Reed, Annette Yoshiko 2003. “‘Jewish Christianity’ after the ‘Parting of the Ways,’” in Reed, A. Y. and Becker, A. (eds.), The Ways that Never Parted: Jews and Christians in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. Texte und Studien zum antiken Judentum 95. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 189231.Google Scholar
Reed, Annette Yoshiko 2005. Fallen Angels and the History of Judaism and Christianity: The Reception of Enochic Literature. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, Annette Yoshiko 2008. “‘Jewish Christianity’ as Counter-history?: The Apostolic Past in Eusebius’ Ecclesiastical History and the Pseudo-Clementine Homilies,” in Gardner, G. and Osterloh, K. (eds.), Antiquity in Antiquity: Jewish and Christian Pasts in the Greco-Roman World. Texte und Studien zum antiken Judentum 123. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 173216.Google Scholar
Reed, Annette Yoshiko 2008. “Heresiology and the (Jewish-) Christian Novel: Narrativized Polemics in the Pseudo-Clementines,” in Iricinschi, E. and Zelletin, H. (eds.), Heresy and Self-Definition in Late Antiquity. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 273298.Google Scholar
Regev, Eyal 2003. “Abominated Temple and a Holy Community: The Formation of the Notions of Purity and Impurity in Qumran,” Dead Sea Discoveries 10/2: 243278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regev, Eyal 2004. “Moral Impurity and the Temple in Early Christianity in Light of Qumranic Ideology and Ancient Greek Practice,” Harvard Theological Review 79: 383411.Google Scholar
Regev, Eyal 2010. “Temple Concerns and High-Priestly Prosecutions from Peter to James: Bet