Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-xbgml Total loading time: 3.636 Render date: 2022-08-20T01:33:26.512Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Works Consulted

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2020

Alister E. McGrath
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Iustitia Dei
A History of the Christian Doctrine of Justification
, pp. 420 - 494
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia, ed. Elliger, K., Rudolph, W., Schenker, A. and Kittel, R.. 5th edn. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 1998.Google Scholar
Biblia Sacra iuxta Vulgatam versionem. 4th edn. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 1994.
The Earlier Version of the Wycliffite Bible, ed. Lindberg, C.. 8 vols. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1959.Google Scholar
Libri Psalmorum versio antiqua Latina cum paraphrasi Anglo-Saxonica, ed. Thorpe, B.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1835.Google Scholar
Septuaginta, ed. Rahlfs, A. and Hanhart, R.. Editio altera. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2014.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Acta Reformationis Catholicae, ed. Pfeilschifter, G.. 6 vols. Regensburg: Pustet, 1959–74.Google Scholar
Die Bekenntnisschriften der Evangelisch–Lutherischen Kirche: Vollständige Neuedition. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2014.
Die Bekenntnisschriften der reformierten Kirche, ed. Müller, E. F. K.. Leipzig: Deichert, 1903.Google Scholar
Concilium Tridentinum diarorum, actorum, epistularum, tractatuum nova collectio. Freiburg: Societas Goersiana, 1901–50.
Corpus Christianorum Series Latina. Turnholt: Brepols, 1953–.
Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1886–.
Denzinger, H., Enchiridion Symbolorum Definitionum et Declarationum de Rebus Fidei et Morum. 39th edn. Freiburg: Herder, 2001.Google Scholar
Dokumente zur Causa Lutheri (1517–1521), ed. Fabish, Peter and Iserloh, Erwin. 2 vols. Münster: Aschendorff, 1988–91.Google Scholar
Lloyd, C., Formularies of Faith Put Forth by Authority during the Reign of Henry VIII. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1825.Google Scholar
Lloyd, C., Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2000.Google Scholar
Migne, J. P., Patrologia cursus completus series Latina. 221 vols. Paris: Migne, 1844–64.Google Scholar
Migne, J. P., Patrologia cursus completus series Graeca. 162 vols. Paris: Migne, 1857–66.Google Scholar
The Pearl, ed. Gordon, E. V.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Opuscoli e lettere di riformatori italiani del cinquecento, ed. Paladino, G.. 2 vols. Bari: Laterza, 1913–27.Google Scholar
The Two Books of Homilies Appointed to Be Read in Churches. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1859.
2
Romanus, Aegidius, Commentarius in secundum librum sententiarum. 2 vols. Venice, 1581.Google Scholar
Ælfric of Eynsham, Homilies, ed. Thorpe, B.. 2 vols. London: Ælfric Society, 1846.Google Scholar
Magnus, Albertus, Opera omnia, ed. Borgnet, S. C. A.. 38 vols. Paris: Vives, 1890–9.Google Scholar
Alexander, III, Die Sentenzen Rolands, nachmals Papstes Alexander III, ed. Gietl, A. M.. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1969.Google Scholar
Alexander of Hales, Glossa in IV. Libros sententiarum. 4 vols. Quaracchi: Typographia Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1951–7.
Alexander of Hales, Quaestiones disputatae antequam esset frater. 3 vols. Quaracchi: Typographia Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1960.
Alexander of Hales (attributed), Summa Theologica. 4 vols. Quaracchi: Typographia Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1924–48.
Alsted, Johann Heinrich, Theologia scholastica didactica. Hanover, 1618.Google Scholar
Ambrosiaster, , Commentary on the Pauline Epistles: Romans, ed. and trans. De Bruyn, T., Cooper, S. A. and Hunter, D. G.. Atlanta, GA: SBL Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrewes, Launcelot, Works. 11 vols. London, 1841–52.Google Scholar
Anselm of Canterbury, Opera omnia, ed. Schmitt, F. S.. 6 vols. Stuttgart: Frommann, 1968.Google Scholar
Anselm of Laon, Anselms von Laon systematische Sentenzen, ed. Bliemetzrieder, F. P.. Münster: Aschendorff, 1919.Google Scholar
Arminius, Jakobus, Works. 3 vols. London: Thomas Baker, 1825–75.Google Scholar
Baius, Michel, Opera. Cologne, 1696.Google Scholar
Barlow, Thomas, Two Letters Written by the Rt Rev. Thomas Barlow. London, 1701.Google Scholar
Barnes, Robert, A supplicatyon Made by Robert Barnes Doctoure in Divinite unto the Most Excellent and Redoubted Prince Kinge Henrye the Eyght. Antwerp, 1531.Google Scholar
Barrow, Isaac, Theological Works, ed. Napier, A.. 9 vols. Cambridge, 1859.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl, ‘Die Gerechtigkeit Gottes’, in Das Wort Gottes und die Theologie. Munich: Kaiser, 1925, 517.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl, Die Christliche Theologie im Entwurf. Munich: Kaiser Verlag, 1927.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl, Kirchliche Dogmatik. 13 vols. Zurich: Evangelischer Verlag, 1932–68.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl, Rechtfertigung und Recht. Zollikon-Zürich: Evangelischen Buchhandlung, 1938.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl, Die Protestantische Theologie im 19. Jahrhundert. Zurich: Evangelischer Verlag, 1957.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl, Die Theologie Calvins, 1922. Zurich: Theologischer Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl, ‘Gespräch mit Vertretern der Herrnhuter Brüdergemeine’, in Gespräche 1959–1962, ed. Busch, E.. Zurich: Theologischer Verlag, 1995, 124–57.Google Scholar
Baxter, Richard, Aphorisms on Justification. London, 1649.Google Scholar
Baxter, Richard, A Treatise of Justifying Righteousness. London, 1676.Google Scholar
Bellarmine, Roberto, Disputationum de controversiis Christianae fidei. Ingolstadt, 1601.Google Scholar
[Benedetto da Mantova, Dom?], Il beneficio di Cristo con le versioni del secolo XVI, ed. Caponetto, Salvatore. Florence: Salvatori, 1972.Google Scholar
Beveridge, William, Theological Works. 12 vols. Oxford, 1844–8.Google Scholar
Beza, Theodore, Iesu Christi Domini Nostri Novum Testamentum … Annotationes. 5th edn. Geneva, 1598.Google Scholar
Beza, Theodore, Tractationes theologicae. 2nd edn. Geneva, 1632.Google Scholar
Biel, Gabriel, Sermones dominicales de tempore. Hagenau, 1510.Google Scholar
Biel, Gabriel, Canonis missae expositio, ed. Oberman, H. A. and Courtenay, W. J.. 4 vols. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1963–7.Google Scholar
Biel, Gabriel, Collectorium circa quattuor libros sententiarum, ed. Werbeck, W. and Hoffmann, U.. 4 vols. Tübingen Mohr, 1973–84.Google Scholar
Bonaventure, Opera omnia. 10 vols. Quaracchi: Typographia Collegii S. Bonaven-turae, 1882–1902.
Bradwardine, Thomas, De causa Dei contra Pelagium. London, 1618.Google Scholar
Bramhall, John, Works. 5 vols. Oxford, 1842–5.Google Scholar
Brochmand, Jesper Rasmussen, Universae theologiae systema. Ulm, 1638.Google Scholar
Brunner, Emil. Das Ärgernis des Christentums: Fünf Vorlesungen über den christlichen Glauben. Zurich: Theologischer Verlag, 1957.Google Scholar
Brunner, Emil. Dogmatik III: Die christliche Lehre von der Kirche, vom Glauben, und von der Vollendung. Zurich: Zwingli-Verlag, 1960.Google Scholar
Brunner, Emil. ‘Die Offenbarung als Grund und Gegenstand der Theologie’, in Ein offenes Wort. 2 vols. Zurich: Theologischer Verlag, 1981, vol. 1, 98122.Google Scholar
Bucanus, Guillaume, Institutiones theologicae. N.p., 1604.
Bucer, Martin, Metaphrasis et Enarrationes in Epistolam ad Romanos. Strasbourg, 1536.Google Scholar
Bucer, Martin, Praelectiones in epistolam ad Ephesios. Basel, 1561.Google Scholar
Bucer, Martin, Metaphrasis et enarratio in epistolam ad Romanos. Basel, 1562.Google Scholar
Buddeus, Johann Franz, Institutiones theologiae dogmaticae. Jena, 1723.Google Scholar
Bull, George, Harmonia apostolica. London, 1842.Google Scholar
Bullinger, Heinrich, Sermonum decades quinque. Zurich, 1552.Google Scholar
Bullinger, Heinrich, De gratia Dei iustificante. Zurich, 1554.Google Scholar
Burmann, Franz, Synopsis theologiae. Amsterdam, 1699.Google Scholar
Calov, Abraham, Systema locorum theologicorum. Wittenberg, 1655.Google Scholar
Calvin, John, Opera omnia quae supersunt. 59 vols. Brunswick, 1863–1900.Google Scholar
Calvin, John, Opera selecta, ed. Barth, P. and Niesel, W.. 5 vols. Munich: Kaiser, 1922–36.Google Scholar
Catechismus Romanus. Leipzig: Tauchnitz, 1852.
Chemnitz, Martin, Loci theologici. 3 vols. Frankfurt, 1599.Google Scholar
Chemnitz, Martin, Examinis Concilii Tridentini. Frankfurt, 1646.Google Scholar
Chubb, Thomas, Several Inquiries. London, 1718.Google Scholar
Chubb, Thomas, Posthumous Works. 2 vols. London, 1747.Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel, The Saints Nosegay, or, 741 Spiritual Flowers. London, 1642.Google Scholar
Cocceius, Johannes, Summa theologiae. Amsterdam, 1665.Google Scholar
Cocceius, Johannes, Opera. 8 vols. Amsterdam, 1673–5.Google Scholar
Contarini, Gasparo, Regesten und Briefe, ed. Dittrich, F.. Braunsberg: Emil Bender, 1881.Google Scholar
Contarini, Gasparo, Gegenreformatorische Schriften 1530–42, ed. Hünermann, F.. Münster: Aschendorff, 1923.Google Scholar
Cosin, John, Works. 5 vols. Oxford, 1843–55.Google Scholar
Cotton, John, Gods Mercie Mixed with His Iustice. London, 1641.Google Scholar
Cotton, John, Christ the Fountaine of Life. London, 1651.Google Scholar
Cotton, John, A Treatise of the Covenant of Grace. London, 1659.Google Scholar
Cranmer, Thomas, Works. 2 vols. Cambridge, 1844–6.Google Scholar
Alighieri, Dante, La divina commedia, ed. Mattalia, D.. 3 vols. Milan: Rizzoli, 1975.Google Scholar
Davenant, John, A Treatise on Justification, or the ‘Disputatio de Iustitia Habituali et Actuali’. London, 1844.Google Scholar
De Molina, Luis, Concordia liberii arbitrii cum gratiae donis. Lisbon, 1588.Google Scholar
De Soto, Domingo, De natura et gratia. Paris, 1549.Google Scholar
De Soto, Domingo, In epistolam ad Romanos commentarii. Antwerp, 1550.Google Scholar
De Suárez, Francisco, Opera omnia. 28 vols. Paris Vives, 1856–78.Google Scholar
De Valdés, Juan, Diálogo de doctrina cristiana, ed. Stockwell, B. F.. Mexico: Mexico City, 1946.Google Scholar
De Valdés, Juan, Las ciento diez divinas consideraciones, ed. Idigoras, J. I. T.. Salamanca: Centro de Estudios Orientales y Ecuménicos, 1975.Google Scholar
De Vega, Andrés, Opusculum de iustificatione. Venice, 1546.Google Scholar
De Vega, Andrés, De iustificatione doctrina universa. Cologne, 1572.Google Scholar
Downham, George, A Treatise of Justification. London, 1639.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, John, Commentaria Oxoniensia. 2 vols. Quaracchi: Typographia Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1912–14.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, John, Opera omnia, ed. Balic, C.. Rome: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis, 1950–.Google Scholar
Durandus of St Pourçain, In Petri Lombardi sententias theologicas commentariorum. 2 vols. Venice, 1571.
Ebeling, Gerhard, Dogmatik des christlichen Glaubens. 3 vols: Tübingen: Mohr, 1979.Google Scholar
Eck, Johannes, Chrysospassus praedestinationis. Augsburg, 1514.Google Scholar
Eck, Johannes, In primum librum sententiarum annotatiunculae, ed. Moore, L.. Leiden: Brill, 1976.Google Scholar
Edwards, Jonathan, Five Discourses on Justification by Faith. Boston, 1738.Google Scholar
Edwards, Jonathan, Works, ed. Hickman, E.. 2 vols. London, 1834.Google Scholar
Eedes, John, The Orthodox Doctrine concerning Justification. London, 1642.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius, Novum instrumentum omne. Basel, 1516.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius, Opera omnia, ed. Clericus, J.. 10 vols. Leiden, 1703–6.Google Scholar
Eyre, William, Vindiciae iustificationis gratuitae. London, 1654.Google Scholar
Farel, Guillaume, Summaire et briefve declaration, ed. Piaget, A.. Paris: Droz, 1935.Google Scholar
Fisher, John, Opera. Würzburg, 1597.Google Scholar
Fisher, John, English Works, ed. Mayor, J. E. B.. EETS extra series 27. London, 1876.Google Scholar
Forbes, William, Considerationes modestae et pacificae. 2 vols. London, 1850–6.Google Scholar
Frith, John, Whole Workes. London, 1573.Google Scholar
Gataker, Thomas, An Antidote against Error. London, 1670.Google Scholar
Gerhard, Johann, Loci communes, ed. Cotta, Johann F.. 10 vols. Tübingen, 1768.Google Scholar
Godescalc of Orbais, Oeuvres théologiques et grammaticales, ed. Lambot, C.. Louvain: Spicilegium Sacrum Lovaniense, 1945.Google Scholar
Gogarten, Friedrich, ʻDas Problem einer theologischen Anthropologie’. ZZ 7 (1929), 493511.Google Scholar
Goodwin, John, Imputatio fidei; or A Treatise of Justification. London, 1615.Google Scholar
Gregory of Rimini, Lectura super primum et secundum sententiarum, ed. Trapp, A. D.. 6 vols. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1979–84.Google Scholar
Gropper, Johann, Enchiridion Christianae institutiones. Cologne, 1536.Google Scholar
Gropper, Johann, Antidigagma. Cologne, 1544.Google Scholar
Hafenreffer, Matthias, Loci theologici. Tübingen, 1603.Google Scholar
Hall, Joseph, Works. 12 vols. Oxford, 1837–9.Google Scholar
Hammond, Henry, A Practical Catechism. London, 1847.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Johann Heinrich, Medulla theologiae Christianae. Zurich, 1616.Google Scholar
Henke, Heinrich Philipp Konrad, Lineamenta institutionum fidei Christianae. Helmstedt, 1793.Google Scholar
Hincmar of Reims, ‘Zwei Schriften des Erzbischofs Hinkmar von Reims’, ed. Gundlach, W.. ZKG 10 (1889), 92145, 258–310.Google Scholar
Hoard, Samuel, and Mason, Henry, God’s Love to Mankind Manifested by Disproving His Absolute Decree for Their Damnation. N.p., 1633.
Holcot, Robert, Opus super sapientiam Salomonis. Hagenau, 1494.Google Scholar
Holcot, Robert, Quaestiones super IV libros sententiarum. Leiden, 1497.Google Scholar
Hooker, Richard, Works, ed. Keble, J.. 3rd edn. 3 vols. Oxford, 1845.Google Scholar
Hooker, Thomas, The Soules Preparation for Christ. London, 1632.Google Scholar
Hooker, Thomas, The Soules Humiliation. London, 1638.Google Scholar
Hooker, Thomas, The Unbeleevers Preparing for Christ. London, 1638.Google Scholar
Hooker, Thomas, Thomas Hooker: Writings in England and Holland 1626–33. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Huss, John, Opera omnia, ed. Flajshans, V.. 3 vols. Prague, 1903–8.Google Scholar
Huss, John, Johannis Hus Tractatus Responsivus, ed. Thomson. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1927.Google Scholar
Hutter, Leonhard, Compendium locorum theologicorum. Wittenberg, 1652.Google Scholar
Jackson, Thomas, Works. 12 vols. Oxford, 1844.Google Scholar
Jansenius, Cornelius, Augustinus. Paris, 1641.Google Scholar
John of La Rochelle, Die neuen Quästionen der Gnadentheologie des Johannes von Rupella, ed. Hodl, L.. Munich: Hueber, 1964.Google Scholar
Joye, George, Answer to Ashwell. [The Letters which Johan Ashwell, Priour of Newnham Abbey, Sent Secretly to the Byshop of Lyncolne …]. Antwerp, 1531.Google Scholar
Latomus, Jacobus, Duae Epistolae. Antwerp, 1544.Google Scholar
Laud, William. The History of the Troubles and Trial of … William Laud. 2 vols. London, 1695–1700.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Gesammelte Schriften. 22 vols. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1902–42.Google Scholar
Knewstub, John, Lectures upon the Twentieth Chapter of Exodus. London, 1577.Google Scholar
Knox, Alexander, Remains, ed. Newman, J. H.. 2nd edn. 4 vols. London, 1836–7.Google Scholar
Koenig, Johann Friedrich, Theologia positiva acroamatica. 11th edn. Rostok, 1703.Google Scholar
Locke, John, The Reasonableness of Christianity, in Works, VII, London, 1823, 1159.Google Scholar
Locke, John, Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Löscher, V. E., Vollständiger Timotheus Verinus oder Darlegung der Wahrheit und des Friedens in denen bisherigen Pietistischen Streitigkeiten. 2 vols. Wittenberg, 1718–21.Google Scholar
Luther, Martin, Kritische Gesamtausgabe. 72 vols. Weimar: Böhlau, 1883–2009.Google Scholar
Luttrell, Johannes, Die Schriften des Oxforder Kanzlers Johannes Lutterell, ed. Hoffmann, F.. Leipzig: St Benno, 1959.Google Scholar
Mair, John, Joannis Majoris doctoris theologiae in quartum sententiarum quaestiones. Paris: Badius, 1516.Google Scholar
Maresius, Samuel, Collegium theologicum. Geneva, 1662.Google Scholar
Victorinus, Marius, Commentarii in epistolas Pauli ad Ephesios, ad Galatos, ad Philippenses, ed. Gori, F.. Turin: Società editrice internazionale, 1981.Google Scholar
Matthew of Aquasparta, Quaestiones disputatae de gratia, ed. Doucet, V.. Quaracchi: Typographia Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1935.Google Scholar
Melanchthon, Philip, Opera omnia quae supersunt. 28 vols. Brunswick, 1834–60.Google Scholar
Melanchthon, Philip, Werke in Auswahl, ed. Stupperich, R.. 8 vols. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann, 1951–75.Google Scholar
Morgan, Thomas, The Moral Philosopher. 3 vols. London, 1738–40.Google Scholar
Mosse, Miles, Iustifying and Saving Faith distinguished from the Faith of the Devils. Cambridge, 1614.Google Scholar
Musculus, Wolfgang, Loci communes sacrae theologiae. Basel, 1561.Google Scholar
Newman, John Henry, Remarks on Certain Passages in the Thirty-Nine Articles. Tract 90. Oxford, 1841.Google Scholar
Newman, John Henry, Lectures on the Doctrine of Justification. 3rd edn. London, 1874.Google Scholar
Rigaldi, Odo, In II Sent. dist. xxvi–xxix, ed. J. Bouvy, in ‘Les Questions sur la grâce dans le Commentaire des Sentences d’Odon Rigaud’, RThAM 27 (1960), 305–43; ‘La necessité de la grâce dans le Commentaire des Sentences d’Odon Rigaud’, RThAM 28 (1961), 69–96.
Owen, John, Works, ed. Russell, T.. 21 vols. London, 1826.Google Scholar
Pelagius, Commentary on St Paul’s Epistle to the Romans, ed. de Bruyn, T.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Perkins, William, An Exposition of the Apostles Creed. Cambridge, 1595.Google Scholar
Perkins, William, Workes. 3 vols. Cambridge, 1608–9.Google Scholar
Petavius, Dionysius, Opus de theologicus dogmatibus. 3 vols. Antwerp, 1700.Google Scholar
Aureoli, Peter, Commentarorium in primum librum sententiarum. Rome, 1596.Google Scholar
Peter of Bergamo, Summa aurea. Venice, 1593.
Cantor, Peter, Summa de sacramentis et animae consiliis, ed. Dugauquier, J.-A.. 5 vols. Louvain: Nauwelaerts, 1954–67.Google Scholar
Lombard, Peter, Libri IV Sententiarum. 2nd edn. 2 vols. Quaracchi: Typographia Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1916.Google Scholar
Peter of Tarantaise, In IV libros sententiarum commentaria. 4 vols. Toulouse, 1649–52.
Pfaff, Christoph Matthaeus, Institutiones theologiae dogmaticae et moralis. Tübingen, 1720.Google Scholar
Philip the Chancellor, Summa de bono, ed. Wicki, N.. Bern: Franke, 1985.Google Scholar
Polanus a Polansdorf, Amandus, Syntagma theologiae Christianae. Geneva, 1612.Google Scholar
Quenstedt, Johannes Andreas, Theologia didactico-polemica. Wittenberg, 1685.Google Scholar
Richard of Middleton, Supra quattuor libros sententiarum. 4 vols. Brescia, 1591.
Robert of Melun, Questiones theologice de epistolis Pauli, ed. Martin, R. M.. Louvain: Spicilegium Sacrum Lovaniense, 1938.Google Scholar
Roger of Marston, Quaestiones disputatae de statu naturae lapsae. Quaracchi: Typographia Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1932.
Roland of Cremona, Summae magistri Rolandi Cremonensis, ed. Cortesi, A.. Bergamo: Edizioni Monumenta Bergomensia, 1962.Google Scholar
Sanderson, Robert, Sermons, ed. Montgomery, P.. 2 vols. London, 1841.Google Scholar
Scherzer, J. A., Breviculus theologicus. 3rd edn. Leipzig, 1680.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, F. D. E., Der christliche Glaube. 4th edn. 2 vols. Berlin, 1842–3.Google Scholar
Simon of Tournai, Les disputationes de Simon de Tournai, ed. Warichez, J.. Louvain: Spicilegium Sacrum Lovaniense, 1932.Google Scholar
Stapleton, Thomas, Opera. 4 vols. Paris, 1620.Google Scholar
Steinbach, Wendelin, Opera exegetica quae supersunt omnia, ed. Feld, H.. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1976.Google Scholar
Steinbart, Gotthilf Samuel, System der reinen Philosophie oder Glückseligkeitslehre des Christenthums. Zullichau, 1778.Google Scholar
Taylor, Jeremy, Works, ed. Eden, C. P.. 10 vols. London, 1847–54.Google Scholar
Teller, Wilhelm Abraham, Die Religion der Vollkommnern. Berlin, 1792.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas, Opera omnia. 31 vols. Rome: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis, 1882–1947.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas, Scriptum super libros sententiarum Magistri Petri Lombardi, ed. Mandonnet, P. and Moos, F.. 4 vols. Paris: Lethielleux, 1929–47.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas, Super Epistolam ad Romanos Lectura. Rome: Marietti, 1953.Google Scholar
Thomas of Strasbourg, Commentaria in IIII libros sententiarum. Venice, 1564.
Tillich, Paul, The Protestant Era. London: Nisbet, 1951.Google Scholar
Tillich, Paul, ‘Das Neue Sein als Zentralbegriff einer christlichen Theologie’, in Eranos-Jahrbuch 1954. Vol. XXIII: Mensch und Wandlung. Zurich: Rhein-Verlag, 1955, 251–74.Google Scholar
Tillich, Paul, Rechtfertigung und Neues Sein. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 2018.Google Scholar
Tindal, Matthew, Christianity as Old as the Creation, ed. Gawlick, G.. Stuttgart: Frommann, 1968.Google Scholar
Toland, John, Christianity not Mysterious, ed. Gawlick, G.. Stuttgart: Frommann, 1964.Google Scholar
Töllner, Johann Gottlieb, Der thätige Gehorsam Christi untersucht. Breslau, 1768.Google Scholar
Töllner, Johann Gottlieb, Theologische Untersuchungen. 2 vols. Riga, 1772–4.Google Scholar
Turrettini, François, Institutio theologiae elencticae. 3 vols. Rome, 1734.Google Scholar
Tyndale, William, Works. 3 vols. Cambridge, 1848.Google Scholar
Ussher, James, Whole Works, ed. Elrington, C. R. and Todd, J. H.. 17 vols. Dublin, 1847–64.Google Scholar
Valla, Lorenzo, Monumenta politica et philosophica rariora. Turin: Bottega d’Erasmo, , 1959.Google Scholar
Van Mastricht, Peter, Theoretico-practica theologia. Amsterdam, 1725.Google Scholar
Van Rijssen, Leonhard, Compendium theologiae didactico elencticae. Amsterdam, 1695.Google Scholar
Vermigli, Peter Martyr, Loci Communes. London, 1583.Google Scholar
Vom Mosheim, Lorenz, Elementa theologiae dogmaticae. Nuremburg, 1758.Google Scholar
Walker, George, A Defence of the True Sense and Meaning of the Words of the Holy Apostle: Rom. 4 ver. 3.5.9. London, 1641.Google Scholar
Wendelin, Friedrich, Christianae theologiae. Amsterdam, 1646.Google Scholar
Wesley, John, Works. 14 vols. London: Epworth Press, 1829–31.Google Scholar
Wesley, John, Sermons on Several Occasions. London: Caxton Press, 1860.Google Scholar
William of Auvergne, Opera omnia. 2 vols. Paris. 1674.
William of Auxerre, Summa aurea in quattuor libros sententiarum. Paris, 1500.
William of Ockham, Commentaria in quattuor libros sententiarum. Leiden, 1495.
William of Ockham, Tractatus de praedestinatione et de praescientia Dei et de futuris contingentibus, ed. Boehmer, P.. New York: Franciscan Institute, 1945.Google Scholar
William of Ockham, Opera philosophica et theologica. 9 vols. New York: Franciscan Institute, 1966–.
Wollebius, Johannes, Christianae theologiae compendium. Amsterdam, 1637.Google Scholar
Zanchi, Girolamo, Commentarius in Epistolam Sancti Pauli ad Ephesios. 2 vols. Amsterdam, 1888.Google Scholar
Zwingli, Huldrych, Sämtliche Werke. 4 vols. Zurich: Theologischer Verlag, 1905–.Google Scholar
3
Aers, D., Salvation and Sin: Augustine, Langland, and Fourteenth-Century Theology. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Affeldt, W., ‘Verzeichnis der Römerbriefkommentare der lateinischen Kirche bis zu Nikolaus von Lyra’, Traditio 13 (1957), 369406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberigo, G., I vescovi italiani al Concilio di Trento (1545–1547). Florence: Sansoni, 1959.Google Scholar
Alberigo, G., ‘From the Council of Trent to “Tridentinism”’, in Bulman, R. F. and Parrella, F. J., eds, From Trent to Vatican II: Historical and Theological Investigations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, 1937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albrecht, Ruth, Johanna Eleonora Petersen: Theologische Schriftstellerin des frühen Pietismus. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alfaro, J., ‘Sobrenatural y pecado original en Bayo’, RET 12 (1952), 376.Google Scholar
Alford, J. A., ‘Jesus the Jouster: The Christ-Knight and Medieval Theories of Atonement in Piers Plowman and the “Round Table” Sermons’, Yearbook of Langland Studies 10 (1996), 129–43.Google Scholar
Allen, M., and Swain, S. R., Reformed Catholicity: The Promise of Retrieval for Theology and Biblical Interpretation. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2015.Google Scholar
Allison, C. F., The Rise of Moralism: The Proclamation of the Gospel from Hooker to Baxter. London: SPCK, 1966.Google Scholar
Althaus, P., ‘Gottes Gottheit als Sinn der Rechtfertigungslehre Luthers’, LuJ 13 (1931), 128.Google Scholar
Alszeghy, S., Nova creatura: la nozione della grazia nei commentari medievali di S. Paolo. Rome: Pontificia Università Gregoriana, 1956.Google Scholar
Amand de Mendieta, D., Fatalisme et liberté dans l’antiquité grecque. Louvain: Bibliothèque de l’université, 1945.Google Scholar
Anatolios, K., ‘The Soteriological Significance of Christ’s Humanity in St. Athanasius’, SVThQ 40 (1996), 265–86.Google Scholar
Anatolios, K., ‘The Soteriological Grammar of Conciliar Christology’, The Thomist 78 (2014), 165–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anciaux, P., La théologie du sacrament du pénance au XIIe siècle. Louvain: Bibliothèque de l’Université, 1949.Google Scholar
Anderson, H. G., Murphy, T. A. and Burgess, J. A., eds, Justification by Faith: Lutherans and Catholics in Dialogue VII. Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Publishing House, 1985.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. W., ‘Luther’s Sola Fide in Italy: 1542–1551’, ChH 38 (1969), 2542.Google Scholar
Angenendt, A., ‘Fear, Hope, Death and Salvation’, in Arnold, J. H., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Medieval Christianity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, 289304.Google Scholar
Ahnert, T., Religion and the Origins of the German Enlightenment: Faith and the Reform of Learning in the Thought of Christian Thomasius. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Arand, C. P., ‘Two Kinds of Righteousness as a Framework for Law and Gospel in the Apology’, LuQ 15 (2001), 417–39.Google Scholar
Armitage, J. M., ‘A Certain Rectitude of Order: Jesus and Justification according to Aquinas’, The Thomist 72 (2008), 4566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, B. G., Calvinism and the Amyraut Heresy: Protestant Scholasticism and Humanism in Seventeenth-Century France. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Artis, A., ‘Locke and Original Sin’, Locke Studies 12 (2012), 201–19.Google Scholar
Ashley, K. M., ‘The Guiler Beguiled: Christ and Satan as Theological Tricksters in Medieval Religious Literature’, Criticism 24 (1982), 126–37.Google Scholar
Aspenson, S. S., ‘Anselmian Satisfaction, Duns Scotus and The Debt of Sin’, Modern Schoolman 73 (1996), 141–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auer, J., Die menschliche Willensfreiheit im Lehrsystem des Thomas von Aquin und Johannes Duns Skotus. Munich: Hueber, 1938.Google Scholar
Auer, J., ‘Textkritische Studien zur Gnadenlehre des Alexander von Hales’, Scholastik 15 (1940), 6375.Google Scholar
Auer, J., Die Entwicklung der Gnadenlehre in der Hochscholastik. 2 vols. Freiburg: Herder, 1942–51.Google Scholar
Aulén, G., ‘Die drei Haupttypen des christlichen Versöhnungsgedankens’, ZSTh 8 (1930), 501–38.Google Scholar
Avemarie, F., Tora und Leben: Untersuchungen zur Heilsbedeutung der Tora in der frühen rabbinischen Literatur. Tübingen: Mohr, 1996.Google Scholar
Ayres, L., Nicaea and Its Legacy: An Approach to Fourth-Century Trinitarian Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, L., ‘Into the Poem of the Universe: Exempla, Conversions, and Church in Augustine’s Confessiones’, ZAC 13 (2009), 263–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baard, R. S., ‘Original Grace, Not Destructive Grace: A Feminist Appropriation of Paul Tillich’s Notion of Acceptance’, JR 87 (2007), 411–34.Google Scholar
Bäder-Butschle, I., Brüchige Fundamente: Eine Revision der Rechtfertigungslehre. Berlin: LIT Verlag, 2017.Google Scholar
Badiou, A., Saint Paul: La fondation de l’universalisme. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1998.Google Scholar
Bagchi, D., ‘“Eyn mercklich underscheyd”: Catholic Reactions to Luther’s Doctrine of the Priesthood of All Believers, 1520–25’, SCH 26 (1989), 155–65.Google Scholar
Bagchi, D., ‘Luther’s Ninety-Five Theses and the Contemporary Criticism of Indulgences’, in Swanson, R., ed., Promissory Notes on the Treasury of Merits: Indulgences in the Later Middle Ages. Leiden: Brill, 2006, 331–55.Google Scholar
Bagchi, D., ‘Defining Heresies: Catholic Heresiologies, 1520–50’, SCH 43 (2007), 241–51.Google Scholar
Bagchi, D., Luther’s Earliest Opponents: Catholic Controversialists, 1518–25. 2nd edn. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Baker, D. W., ‘The Historical Faith of William Tyndale: Non-Salvific Reading of Scripture at the Outset of the English Reformation’, RenQ 62 (2009), 661–92.Google Scholar
Bakhuizen van den Brink, J. N., ‘Mereo(r) and Meritum in Some Latin Fathers’, StPatr 3 (1961), 333–40.Google Scholar
Bakhuizen van den Brink, J. N., Juan de Valdés réformateur en Espagne et en Italie. Geneva: Droz, 1969.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. W., Masters, Princes, and Merchants: The Social Views of Peter the Chanter & His Circle. 2 vols. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Ball, D., ‘Libre arbitre et liberté dans Saint Augustin’, AThA 6 (1945), 368–82.Google Scholar
Ball, D., ‘Les développements de la doctrine de la liberté chez Saint Augustin’, AThA 7 (1946), 400–30.Google Scholar
Ballor, J. J., Covenant, Causality, and Law: A Study in the Theology of Wolfgang Musculus. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bammel, C. P., ‘Justification by Faith in Augustine and Origen’, JEH 47 (1996), 223–35.Google Scholar
Bannach, K., Die Lehre von der doppelten Macht Gottes bei Wilhelm von Ockham. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1975.Google Scholar
Barclay, J. M. G., ‘“Neither Jew Nor Greek”: Multiculturalism and the New Perspective on Paul’, in Brett, M. G., ed., Ethnicity and the Bible. Leiden: Brill, 1996, 197214.Google Scholar
Barclay, J. M. G., ʻConstructing Judean Identity after 70 C.E.: A Study of Josephus’s “Against Apion”’, in Crook, Z. A. and Harland, P. A., eds, Identity and Interaction in the Ancient Mediterranean: Jews, Christians and Others. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2007, 99112.Google Scholar
Barclay, J. M. G., ‘Under Grace: The Christ-Gift and the Construction of a Christian Habitus’, in Gaventa, B., ed., Apocalyptic Paul: Cosmos and Anthropos in Romans 5–8. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2013, 5976.Google Scholar
Barclay, J. M. G., Paul and the Gift. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2015.Google Scholar
Barclift, P. L., ‘In Controversy with Saint Augustine: Julian of Eclanum on the Nature of Sin’, RThAM 58 (1991), 520.Google Scholar
Barmann, L. F., ‘Baron Friedrich von Hügel and the Great War’, in Talar, C. J. T. and Barmann, L. F., eds, Roman Catholic Modernists Confront the Great War. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015, 77106.Google Scholar
Barnett, M. J., ‘Erasmus and the Hermeneutics of Linguistic Praxis’, RenQ 49 (1996), 542–72.Google Scholar
Barnett, S. J., The Enlightenment and Religion: The Myths of Modernity. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Barth, H.-M., ‘Martin Luther disputiert über den Menschen: Ein Beitrag zu Luthers Anthropologie’, KuD 27 (1981), 154–66.Google Scholar
Barth, U., ‘Das gebrochene Verhältnis zur Reformation: Beobachtungen zum Protestantismusverständnis Albrecht Ritschls’, in Berger, M. and Murrmann-Kahl, M., eds, Transformationsprozesse des Protestantismus: Zur Selbstreflexion einer christlichen Konfession an der Jahrtausendwende. Gütersloh: Mohn, 1999, 8099.Google Scholar
Bartlett, R., The Natural and the Supernatural in the Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Baschera, L., Tugend und Rechtfertigung: Peter Martyr Vermiglis Kommentar zur Nikomachischen Ethik im Spannungsfeld von Philosophie und Theologie. Zurich: Theologischer Verlag, 2008.Google Scholar
Basse, M., Certitudo Spei: Thomas von Aquins Begründung der Hofffnungsgewissheit und ihre Rezeption bis zum Konzil von Trient: Ein Beitrag zur Verhältnisbestimmung von Eschatologie und Rechtfertigungslehre. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1993.Google Scholar
Basse, M., ‘Theologiegeschichtsschreibung und Kontroverstheologie: Die Bedeutung der Scholastik für die protestantische Kirchengeschichtsschreibung’, ZKG 107 (1996), 5071.Google Scholar
Bastianel, S., ‘L’uomo giustificato, nuova creatura in Cristo. Il punto di vista cattolico’, in Ancona, G., ed., La giustificazione: Atti del VII Corso di Aggiornamento tenutosi a Roma nei giorni 2‒4 gennaio 1997. Padua: Il Messaggero, 195–213.
Batto, B. F., ‘Zedeq’, in van der Toorn, K., Becking, B. and van der Horst, P.W., eds, Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible. Leiden: Brill, 1999, 923–34.Google Scholar
Bauks, M., ‘“Chaos” als Metapher für die Gefährdung der Weltordnung’, in Janowski, B., Ego, B. and Krüger, A., eds, Das biblische Weltbild und seine altorientalischen Kontexte. Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2001, 431–64.Google Scholar
Bauke-Ruegg, J., ‘Die Frage nach dem gnädigen Gott: Erinnerungen an einige Implikationen der reformatorischen Rechtfertigungslehre’, EvTh 57 (1997), 474–95.Google Scholar
Baur, F. C., Die christliche Lehre von der Versöhnung in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung von der ältesten Zeit bis auf die neueste. Tübingen: C. F. Osiander, 1838.Google Scholar
Baur, J., Salus Christiana: Die Rechtfertigungslehre in der Geschichte des christlichen Heilsverständnisses. Gütersloh: Mohn, 1968.Google Scholar
Baur, J., Frei durch Rechtfertigung: Vorträge anlässlich der römisch-katholisch lutherischen ‘Gemeinsamen Erklärung’. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1999.Google Scholar
Bavaud, G., ‘La doctrine de la justification d’après Saint Augustin et la Réforme’, REAug 5 (1959), 2132.Google Scholar
Bavaud, G., ‘La Doctrine de la justification d’après Calvin et le Concile de Trent’, VCaro 22 (1968), 8392.Google Scholar
Bavaud, G., ‘L’attitude du réformateur Pierre Viret face à l’argument de prescription chez saint Augustin’, REAug 26 (1980), 257‒65.Google Scholar
Bavaud, G., Le réformateur Pierre Viret (1511‒1571): sa théologie. Geneva: Labor et Fides, 1986.Google Scholar
Bayer, O., Promissio: Geschichte der reformatorischen Wende in Luthers Theologie. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1971.Google Scholar
Bayer, O., ‘Tillich as a Systematic Theologian’, in Re Manning, R., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Paul Tillich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009, 18‒38.Google Scholar
Beach, J. M., ‘The Doctrine of the Pactum Salutis in the Covenant Theology of Herman Witsius’, MJT 13 (2002), 101–42.Google Scholar
Beachy, A. J., The Concept of Grace in the Radical Reformation. Nieuwkoop: De Graaf, 1977.Google Scholar
Beatrice, P. F., Tradux peccati: Alle fonti della dottrina agostiniana del peccato originale. Milan: Vita e pensiero, 1978.Google Scholar
Beavis, M. A., ‘Christian Origins, Egalitarianism, and Utopia’, JFSR 23 (2007), 2749Google Scholar
Bebbington, D., ‘Revival and Enlightenment in Eighteenth-Century England’, in Walker, A. and Aune, K., eds, On Revival: A Critical Examination. Carlisle: Paternoster, 2003, 7186.Google Scholar
Bebbington, D., ‘Calvin and British Evangelicalism in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries’, in Backus, I. and Benedict, P., eds, Calvin and His Influence, 1509–2009. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011, 282300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaufret, J., ‘Heidegger et la théologie’, in Kearny, R. and O’Leary, J. S., eds, Heidegger et la question de Dieu. Paris: Grasset, 1980, 1936.Google Scholar
Beck, H., Vorsehung und Vorherbestimmung in der theologischen Literatur der Byzantiner. Rome: Institutum Orientalium studiorum, 1937.Google Scholar
Becker, K. J., Die Rechtfertigungslehre nach Domingo de Soto: Das Denken eines Konzilsteilnehmers vor, in und nach Trient. Rome: Gregorian University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Beckwith, C. C., ‘Martin Chemnitz’s Use of the Church Fathers in His Locus on Justification’, CTQ 68 (2004), 271–90.Google Scholar
Bedouelle, G., ‘Le canon de l’Ancien Testament dans la perspectif du Concile de Trent’, in Kaestli, J. D. and Wermelinger, O., eds, Le Canon de l’Ancien Testament: sa formation et sa histoire. Geneva: Labor et Fides, 1984, 253–82.Google Scholar
Beeke, J. R., Debated Issues in Sovereign Predestination: Early Lutheran Predestination, Calvinian Reprobation, and Variations in Genevan Lapsarianism. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beeley, C. A., The Unity of Christ: Continuity and Conflict in Patristic Tradition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Begheyn, P., ‘The Catechism (1555) of Peter Canisius, the Most Published Book by a Dutch Author in History’, Quaerendo 36 (2006), 5184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beintker, M., Rechtfertigung in der neuzeitlichen Lebenswelt: Theologische Erkundungen. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1998.Google Scholar
Beisser, F., Schleiermachers Lehre von Gott. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1970.Google Scholar
Bejczy, I. P., The Cardinal Virtues in the Middle Ages: A Study in Moral Thought from the Fourth to the Fourteenth Century. Leiden: Brill, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, R. H., No One Seeks for God: An Exegetical and Theological Study of Romans 1.18–3.20. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1998.Google Scholar
Beltrán de Heredia, V., ‘Controversia de certitudine gratiae entre Domingo de Soto y Ambrosio Catarino’, Ciencia Tomista 62 (1941), 3362.Google Scholar
Berge, K., ‘Sedaqa and the Community of the Scribes in Post-Exilic Deuteronomy: A Didactical Perspective’, in Gillmayr-Bucher, S. and Häusl, M., eds, Sedaqa and Torah in Postexilic Discourse. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2017, 1936.Google Scholar
Bermon, P., ‘La Lectura sur les deux premiers livres des Sentences de Grégoire de Rimini O.E.S.A. (1300‒1358)’, in Evans, G. R., ed., Medieval Commentaries on Peter Lombard’s Sentences. 2 vols. Leiden: Brill, 2001, vol. 1, 267–85.Google Scholar
Bataillon, M., Érasme et l’Espagne. Paris: Droz, 1937.Google Scholar
Betts, C. J., Early Deism in France: From the So-Called ‘Déistes’ of Lyon (1564) to Voltaire’s ‘Lettres Philosophiques’ (1734). The Hague: Nijhoff, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betz, O., ‘Rechtfertigung in Qumran’, in Betz, O., ed., Jesus: Der Messias Israels: Aufsätze zur biblischen Theologie. Tübingen: Mohr, 1976, 3958.Google Scholar
Beumer, J., ‘Gratia supponit naturam: Zur Geschichte eines theologischen Prinzips’, Gregorianum 20 (1939), 381406, 535–52.Google Scholar
Beumer, J., ‘Zwei “Vermittlungstheologen” der Reformationszeit: Philipp Melanchthon und Georg Witzel’, ThPh 43 (1968), 502–22.Google Scholar
Beutel, A., Gerhard Ebeling: Eine Biographie. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2012.Google Scholar
Biechler, J. E., ‘Gabriel Biel on “liberum arbitrium’, The Thomist 34 (1970), 114–27.Google Scholar
Bierma, L. D., German Calvinism in the Confessional Age: The Covenant Theology of Caspar Olevianus. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1997.Google Scholar
Bierma, L. D., ‘Law and Grace in Ursinus’ Doctrine of the Natural Covenant: A Reappraisal’, in Trueman, C. R. and Clark, R. S., eds, Protestant Scholasticism: Essays in Reassessment. Carlisle: Paternoster, 1999, 96110.Google Scholar
Biersack, M., ‘The Adoption of Humanism in Catholic Spain (1470–1520)’, RRR 21 (2019), 2746.Google Scholar
Billings, J. T., Calvin, Participation, and the Gift: The Activity of Believers in Union with Christ. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, M. F., The Saving Righteousness of God: Studies on Paul, Justification, and the New Perspective. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2007.Google Scholar
Bird, M. F., and Dodson, J. R., eds, Paul and the Second Century. London: T&T Clark, 2011.Google Scholar
Bireley, R., ‘The Religious Movements of the Sixteenth Century as Responses to a Changing World’, in François, W. and Soen, V., eds, The Council of Trent: Reform and Controversy in Europe and Beyond (1545–1700). 3 vols. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2018, vol. 1, 2948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bizer, E., Theologie der Verheissung: Studien zur theologische Entwicklung des jungen Melanchthon 1519–1524. Neukirchen: Neukirchener Verlag, 1964.Google Scholar
Bizer, E., Fides ex auditu: Eine Untersuchung über die Entdeckung der Gerechtigkeit Gottes durch Martin Luther. 3rd edn. Neukirchen: Neukirchener Verlag, 1966.Google Scholar
Black, C. F., ‘The Council of Trent and Bases for Continuing Reform’, in Church, Religion, and Society in Early Modern Italy. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004, 1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackwell, B. C., Christosis: Pauline Soteriology in Light of Deification in Irenaeus and Cyril of Alexandria. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomme, R., La Doctrine de la peché dans les écoles théologiques de la première moitié du XIIe siècle. Louvain: Publications universitaires de Louvain, 1958.Google Scholar
Blowers, P., The Drama of the Divine Economy: Creator and Creation in Early Christian Theology and Piety. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bluhm, H., ‘Bedeutung und Eigenart von Luthers Septembertestament: Eine Analyse von Römer iii. 19–31’, LuJ 39 (1972), 5579.Google Scholar
Bockmuehl, M., ‘Wright’s Paul in a Cloud of (Other) Witnesses’, JSPL 4 (2014), 5970.Google Scholar
Boersma, H., ‘Calvin and the Extent of the Atonement’, EvQ 64 (1992), 333–55.Google Scholar
Boersma, H., A Hot Pepper Corn: Richard Baxter’s Doctrine of Justification in Its Seventeenth-Century Context of Controversy. Zoetermeer: Uitgevererij Boekencentrum, 1993.Google Scholar
Böhl, E., Von der Rechtfertigung durch den Glauben: Ein Beitrag zur Rettung des protestantischen Kardinaldogmas. Amsterdam: Scheffer, 1890.Google Scholar
Boisset, J., ‘Justification et sanctification chez Calvin’, in Neusner, W. H., ed., Calvinus Theologus: Die Referate des Congrés Européen de recherches Calviniennes. Neukirchen: Neukirchener Verlag, 1976, 131–48.Google Scholar
Bonner, A., The Myth of Pelagianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonner, G., ‘Pelagianism and Augustine’, AugSt 23 (1992), 3351.Google Scholar
Borghino, A., La nuova alleanza in Is 54: analisi esegetico-teologica. Rome: Pontificia Università Gregoriana, 2005.Google Scholar
Bornkamm, H., ‘Iustitia Dei in der Scholastik und bei Luther’, ARG 39 (1942), 146.Google Scholar
Bornkamm, H., ‘Humanismus und Reform im Menschenbild Melanchthons’, in Das Jahrhundert der Reformation. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1961, 6987.Google Scholar
Bornkamm, H., ‘Zur Frage der Iustitia Dei beim jungen Luther’, ARG 52 (1961), 1629; 53 (1962), 1–60.Google Scholar
Boss, G., Die Rechtfertigungslehre in den Bibelkommentaren des Kornelius a Lapide. Münster: Aschendorff, 1962.Google Scholar
Boucaud, P., ‘Raban Maur (ca. 780‒856), commentateur de I Corinthiens’, in Depreux, P., Lebecq, S., Perrin, M. and Szerwiniack, O., eds, Raban Maur et son temps. Turnhout: Brepols, 2010, 305–23.Google Scholar
Boucaud, P., ‘The Corpus Paulinum: Greek and Latin Exegesis of the Epistles in the First Millennium’, RHR 230 (2013), 299332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bougerol, J.-G., ‘The Church Fathers and the Sentences of Peter Lombard’, in Backus, I., ed., The Reception of the Church Fathers in the West: From the Carolingians to the Maurists. 2 vols. Leiden: Brill, 1997, vol. 1, 113–64.Google Scholar
Bouillard, H., Conversion et grâce chez S. Thomas d’Aquin. Paris: Aubier Editions Montaigne, 1944.Google Scholar
Boureau, A., ‘L’usage des textes patristiques dans les controverses scolastiques’, RSPhTh 91 (2007), 3949.Google Scholar
Bouwsma, W. J., ‘Calvinism as a Renaissance Artifact’, in George, T., ed., John Calvin and the Church: A Prism of Reform. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1990, 2841.Google Scholar
Bovati, P. Ristabilire la giustizia: Procedure, vocabolario, orientamenti. 2nd edn. Rome: Gregorian University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Boysen, K. H., Christus und sein dreifaches Amt: Multiperspektivische Annäherungen an eine zentrale Figur christologischen Denkens. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2019.Google Scholar
Bozeman, T. D., ‘Federal Theology and the “National Covenant”: An Elizabethan Case Study’, ChH 61 (1992), 394407.Google Scholar
Braaten, C. E., Justification: The Article by Which the Church Stands or Falls. Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Fortress, 1990.Google Scholar
Braaten, C. E., and Jenson, R. W., eds., Union with Christ: The New Finnish Interpretation of Luther. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1998.Google Scholar
Bradley, D. J. M., Aquinas on the Twofold Human Good: Reason and Human Happiness in Aquinas’s Moral Science. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Brady, I., ‘The Distinctions of the Lombard’s Book of Sentences and Alexander of Hales’, FrS 25 (1965), 90116.Google Scholar
Brakke, D., The Gnostics: Myth, Ritual, and Diversity in Early Christianity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Brancatelli, R. J., ‘“Beset on Every Side”: Reimagining the Ideology of the Roman Catechism (1566)’, in Bulman, R. F. and Parrella, F. J., eds, From Trent to Vatican II: Historical and Theological Investigations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, 283–99.Google Scholar
Braunisch, R., Die Theologie der Rechtfertigung im ‘Enchiridion’ (1538) des Johannes Gropper: Sein kritischer Dialog mit Philipp Melanchthon. Münster: Aschendorff, 1974.Google Scholar
Brecht, M., ‘Probleme der Pietismusforschung’, DRChH 76 (1997), 227–37.Google Scholar
Briskina, A., Philipp Melanchthon und Andreas Osiander im Ringen um die Rechtfertigungslehre: Ein Reformatorischer Streit aus der Ostkirchlichen Perspektive. New York: Peter Lang, 2006.Google Scholar
Brockway, R. W., A Wonderful Work of God: Puritanism and the Great Awakening. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Brown, P., ‘Pelagius and His Supporters: Aims and Environment’, JThS 19 (1968), 93114.Google Scholar
Brown, P., ‘The Patrons of Pelagius: The Roman Aristocracy between East and West’, JThS 21 (1970), 5672.Google Scholar
Brown, P., Augustine of Hippo: A Biography. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Bruch, R., ‘Die Urgerechtigkeit als Rechtheit des Willens nach der Lehre des hl. Bonaventuras’, FS 33 (1951), 180206.Google Scholar
Brundin, A., Vittoria Colonna and the Spiritual Poetics of the Italian Reformation. London: Routledge, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brundin, A., and Treherne, M., eds, Forms of Faith in Sixteenth-Century Italy. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2009.Google Scholar
Brunner, E., Ein offenes Wort: Vorträge und Aufsätze 1917‒1934. 2 vols. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag, 1981.Google Scholar
Brunner, H., ‘Die Gerechtigkeit Gottes’, ZRGG 39 (1987), 269–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, P., ‘Die Rechtfertigungslehre des Konzils von Trient’, in Pro veritate: Eine theologischer Dialog. Münster: Kassel, 1963, 5996.Google Scholar
Brydon, M., The Evolving Reputation of Richard Hooker: An Examination of Responses, 1600–1714. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bubenheimer, U., Consonantia Theologiae et Iurisprudentiae: Andreas Bodenstein von Karlstadt als Theologe und Jurist zwischen Scholastik und Reformation. Tübingen: Mohr, 1977.Google Scholar
Buchheit, V., ‘Die Definition der Gerechtigkeit bei Laktanz und seinen Vorgängern’, VigChr 33 (1979), 356–74.Google Scholar
Bultmann, R., ‘The Primitive Christian Kerygma and the Historical Jesus’, in Braaten, C. E. and Harrisville, R. A., eds, The Historical Jesus and the Kerygmatic Christ; Essays on the New Quest of the Historical Jesus. New York: Abingdon Press, 1964, 1542.Google Scholar
Bultmann, R., ‘Die Krisis des Glaubens’, in Glauben und Verstehen. Gesammelte Aufsätze. Tübingen: Mohr, 1965, vol. 2, 119.Google Scholar
Burger, C. P., ‘Das auxilium speciale Dei in der Gnadenlehre Gregors von Rimini’, in Oberman, H. A., ed., Gregor von Rimini: Werk und Wirkung bis zur Reformation. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1981, 195240.Google Scholar
Burk, D., 2012. ‘The Righteousness of God (Dikaiosune Theou) and Verbal Genitives: A Grammatical Clarification’, JSNT 34 (2012), 346–60.Google Scholar
Burnaby, J., Amor Dei: A Study of the Religion of St. Augustine. London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1947.Google Scholar
Burson, J. D., The Rise and Fall of Theological Enlightenment: Jean-Martin de Prades and Ideological Polarization in Eighteenth-Century France. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, M. E., Victorian Reformations: Historical Fiction and Religious Controversy, 1820–1900. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Burton, S. J. G., The Hallowing of Logic: The Trinitarian Method of Richard Baxter’s Methodus Theologiae. Leiden: Brill, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buschart, D., and Eilers, K., Theology as Retrieval: Receiving the Past, Renewing the Church. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Butin, P. W., Revelation, Redemption, and Response: Calvin’s Trinitarian Understanding of the Divine–Human Relationship. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Buuck, F., ‘Zum Rechtfertigungsdekret’, in Schreiber, G., ed., Das Weltkonzil von Trient: Sein Werden und Wirken. 2 vols. Freiburg: Herder, 1951, 117–43.Google Scholar
Bynum Walker, C., ‘The Power in the Blood: Sacrifice, Satisfaction, and Substitution in Late Medieval Soteriology’, in Davis, S. T., Kendall, D. and O’Collins, G., eds, The Redemption: An Interdisciplinary Symposium on Christ as Redeemer. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, 177204.Google Scholar
Bynum Walker, C., Wonderful Blood: Theology and Practice in Late Medieval Northern Germany and Beyond. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Byrne, B., ‘Interpreting Romans Theologically in a Post-“New Perspective” Perspective’, HThR 94 (2001), 227–41.Google Scholar
Caldwell, R. W., Communion in the Spirit: The Holy Spirit as the Bond of Union in the Theology of Jonathan Edwards. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2007.Google Scholar
Cameron, E., ‘The Possibilities and Limits of Conciliation: Philipp Melanchthon and Interconfessional Dialogue in the Sixteenth Century’, in Louthan, H. P. and Zachman, R. C., eds, Conciliation and Confession: The Struggle for Unity in the Age of Reform, 1415–1648. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2004, 7388.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. A., The Quest for Paul’s Gospel: A Suggested Strategy. London: T&T Clark, 2005.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. A., The Deliverance of God: An Apocalyptic Rereading of Justification in Paul. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2009.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. A., ‘Christ and the Church in Paul: A “Post-New Perspective” Account’, in Bird, M. F., ed., Four Views on the Apostle Paul. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2012, 113–43.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. A., ‘The Current Crisis: The Capture of Paul’s Gospel by Methodological Arianism’, in Tilling, C., ed., Beyond Old and New Perspectives on Paul. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2014, 3748.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. A., Framing Paul: An Epistolary Biography. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2014.Google Scholar
Campbell, T. A., The Religion of the Heart. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Campbell, T. A., ‘The Shape of Wesleyan Thought: The Question of John Wesley’s “Essential” Christian Doctrines’, Asbury Theological Review 59 (2004), 2748.Google Scholar
Campbell, W. S., Hawkins, P. S. and Schildgen, B. D., eds, Medieval Readings of Romans. New York: T&T Clark International, 2007.Google Scholar
Campi, E., ‘The Council of Trent and the Magisterial Reformers’, in François, W. and Soen, V., eds, The Council of Trent: Reform and Controversy in Europe and Beyond (1545–1700). 3 vols. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2018, vol. 1, 277309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capánaga, V., ‘La deificación en la soteriología agustiniana’, in Augustinus Magister. 3 vols. Paris: Etudes Augustiniennes, 1954, vol. 2, 745–54.Google Scholar
Capéran, L., Le problème du salut des infidèles. 2 vols. Toulouse: Grand Séminaire, 1934.Google Scholar
Carleton Paget, J., and Lieu, J., eds, Christianity in the Second Century: Themes and Developments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carman, T., Heidegger’s Analytic: Interpretation, Discourse, and Authenticity in Being and Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, A. J., ‘Disenchantment, Rationality, and the Modernity of Max Weber’, Forum Philosophicum 16 (2011), 117–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cary, P., Inner Grace: Augustine in the Traditions of Plato and Paul. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, M., ‘Girolamo Seripando, il concilio di Trento e la riforma della chiesa’, in Cestaro, A., ed., Geronimo Seripando e la chiesa del suo tempo. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteraturam, 1997, 189225.Google Scholar
Cassidy, J. J., ‘T. F. Torrance’s Realistic Soteriological Objectivism and the Elimination of Dualisms: Union with Christ in Current Perspective’, MJT 19 (2008), 164–94.Google Scholar
Casteel, T. W., ‘Calvin and Trent: Calvin’s Reaction to the Council of Trent in the Context of His Conciliar Thought’, HThR 63 (1970), 91117.Google Scholar
Celenza, C. S., ‘Renaissance Humanism and the New Testament: Lorenzo Valla’s Annotations to the Vulgate’, JMRS 24 (1994), 3352.Google Scholar
Celsor, S. A., Word and Faith in the Formation of Christian Personhood Coram Deo: Gerhard Ebeling’s Rejection of the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification. New York: Peter Lang, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, H., ‘The Lectures on Justification’, in Merrigan, T. and Kerr, I., eds, Newman after a Hundred Years. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990, 287307.Google Scholar
Chalamet, C., Dialectical Theologians: Wilhelm Herrmann, Karl Barth and Rudolf Bultmann. Zurich: Theologischer Verlag, 2005.Google Scholar
Chalamet, C., ‘La Première Guerre mondiale et la mise en crise de la théologie protestante germanophone et francophone’, RSR 105 (2017), 557–75.Google Scholar
Champagne, M. T., ‘Christian Hebraism in Twelfth-Century Rome: A Philologist’s Correction of the Latin Bible through Dialogue with Jewish Scholars and Their Hebrew Texts’, SCH 53 (2017), 7187.Google Scholar
Champion, J., The Pillars of Priestcraft Shaken: The Church of England and Its Enemies 1660–1730. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Chantraine, G., ‘Mystère’ et ‘Philosophie du Christ’ selon Erasme. Gembloux: Editions Duculot, 1971.Google Scholar
Chappel, J., Catholic Modern: The Challenge of Totalitarianism and the Remaking of the Church. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chazelle, C. M., and Edwards, B. V. N., eds, The Study of the Bible in the Carolingian Era. Turnhout: Brepols, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chéné, J., ‘Que significiaient “initium fidei” et “affectus credulitatis” pour les semipélagiens?’, RSR 35 (1948), 566–88.Google Scholar
Chéné, J., ‘Le Semipélagianisme du Midi et de la Gaule d’après les lettres de Prosper d’Aquitaine et d’Hilaire à Saint Augustin’, RSR 43 (1955), 321–41.Google Scholar
Chenu, M.-D., La théologie comme science au XIIIe siècle. Paris: Librarie Philosophie J. Vrin, 1969.Google Scholar
Chester, S. J., Conversion at Corinth: Perspectives on Conversion in Paul’s Theology and the Corinthian Church. London: T&T Clark, 2005.Google Scholar
Chester, S. J., Reading Paul with the Reformers: Reconciling Old and New Perspectives. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2017.Google Scholar
Choudhury, M., and Watkins, D. J., eds, Belief and Politics in Enlightenment France: Essays in Honor of Dale K. van Kley. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Christ, C., ‘Das Schriftverständnis von Zwingli und Erasmus im Jahre 1522’, Zwingliana 16 (1983), 111–25.Google Scholar
Christensen, M. J., and Wittung, J. A., eds, Partakers of the Divine Nature: The History and Development of Deification in the Christian Traditions. Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Christes, J., ‘Christliche und heidnisch-römische Gerechtigkeit in Augustins Werk “De Civitate Dei”’, RhM 123 (1980), 163–77.Google Scholar
Cipriani, N., ‘Agostino lettore dei commentari paolini di Mario Vittorino’, Augustinianum 38 (1998), 413–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapper, G. S., John Wesley on Religious Affections: His Views on Experience and Emotion and Their Role in the Christian Life and Theology. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Clark, E. A., The Origenist Controversy: The Cultural Construction of an Early Christian Debate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Clark, J., ‘Providence, Predestination and Progress: or, Did the Enlightenment Fail?’, Albion 35 (2003), 559–89.Google Scholar
Clark, M., ‘Augustine on Justice’, REAug 9 (1963), 87‒94.Google Scholar
Clark, R. S., ‘Iustitia Imputata Christi: Alien or Proper to Luther’s Doctrine of Justication?’, EvQ 70 (2006) 269310.Google Scholar
Clark, R. S., ‘Christ and Covenant: Federal Theology in Reformed Orthodoxy’, in Selderhuis, H., ed., A Companion to Reformed Orthodoxy. Leiden: Brill, 2013, 403–28.Google Scholar
Clifford, A. C., ‘Justification: The Calvin–Saumur perspective’, EvQ 79 (2007), 331–48.Google Scholar
Cloes, H., ‘La systématization théologique pendant la première moitié du XIIe siècle’, EThL 34 (1958), 277329.Google Scholar
Cohen, J., ‘The Mystery of Israel’s Salvation: Romans 11:25–26 in Patristic and Medieval Exegesis’, HThR 98 (2005), 247–8.Google Scholar
Colish, M., ‘The Sentence Collection and the Education of Professional Theologians in the Twelfth Century’, in van Deusen, N., ed., The Intellectual Climate of the Early University. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University, 1997, 126.Google Scholar
Colish, M., ‘Systematic Theology and Theological Research in the Twelfth Century’, JMRS 18 (1988), 135–56.Google Scholar
Collins, K. J., ‘John Wesley’s Doctrine of the New Birth’, Wesleyan Theological Journal 32 (1997), 5368.Google Scholar
Collins, K. J., John Wesley: A Theological Journey. Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 2003.Google Scholar
Collinson, P., ‘The Fog in the Channel Clears: The Rediscovery of the Continental Dimension to the British Reformations’, in Ha, P. and Collinson, P., eds, The Reception of Continental Reformation in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, xxviixxxvii.Google Scholar
Cololeu, A., ‘On the Reception of Erasmus’s Latin Version of the New Testament in Sixteenth-Century Spain’, Bible Translator 67 (2016), 5668.Google Scholar
Colson, C., and Neuhaus, R. J., eds, Evangelicals and Catholics Together: Toward a Common Mission. Dallas, TX: Word, 1995.Google Scholar
Colzani, G., ‘La nozione di “giustificazione”: Il senso del suo impiego nei dibattiti tridentini, la verifica di un modello di comprensione’, in Ancona, G., ed., La giustificazione: Atti del VII Corso di Aggiornamento tenutosi a Roma nei giorni 2‒4 gennaio 1997. Padua: Il Messaggero, 65–111.
Como, D., ‘Predestination and Political Conflict in Laud’s London’, HJ 46 (2003), 263–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Condonier, V., and Steel, C., ‘Guillaume de Moerbeke Traducteur du Liber de Bona Fortuna et de l’Éthique à Eudème’, in van Oppenraaij, A. M. I. and Fontaine, R., eds, The Letter before the Spirit: The Importance of Text Editions for the Study of the Reception of Aristotle. Leiden: Brill, 2012, 401–46.Google Scholar
Congdon, D. W., The Mission of Demythologizing: Rudolf Bultmann’s Dialectical Theology. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conkling, M., ‘Pietism on the American Landscape’, ConJ 41(2015), 220–35.Google Scholar
Connolly, H., Irish Penitentials and Their Significance for the Sacrament of Penance Today. Dublin: Four Courts, 1995.Google Scholar
Constas, M., ‘The Reception of Paul and Pauline Theology in the Byzantine Period’, in Krueger, D. and Nelson, R. S., eds, The New Testament in Byzantium. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library, 2016, 147–76.Google Scholar
Constas, N. P., ‘The Last Temptation of Satan: Divine Deception in Greek Patristic Interpretations of the Passion Narrative’, HThR 97 (2004), 139–63.Google Scholar
Coogan, R., Erasmus, Lee and the Correction of the Vulgate: The Shaking of the Foundations. Geneva: Droz, 1992.Google Scholar
Cooper, A. G., The Body in St Maximus the Confessor: Holy Flesh, Wholly Deified. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J., The Righteousness of One: An Evaluation of Early Patristic Soteriology in Light of the New Perspective on Paul. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2013.Google Scholar
Cooper, T.Why Did Richard Baxter and John Owen Diverge? The Impact of the First Civil War’, JEH 61 (2010), 496516.Google Scholar
Coors, M., Scriptura efficax: Die biblisch-dogmatische Grundlegung des theologischen Systems bei Johann Andreas Quenstedt. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornwall, R. D., ‘The Search for the Primitive Church: The Use of Early Church Fathers in the High Church Anglican Tradition, 1680–1745’, AEH 59 (1990), 303–29.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, C. H., ‘Justification in Paul: A Linguistic and Theological Reflection’, JBL 106 (1987), 653–70.Google Scholar
Cottret, B., ‘Rousseau était-il protestant? Péché, justification et Écriture selon Jean-Jacques’, ETR 90 (2015), 563–80.Google Scholar
Couenhoven, J., Stricken by Sin, Cured by Christ: Agency, Necessity, and Culpability in Augustinian Theology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courcelle, P., Recherches sur les Confessions de Saint Augustin. Paris: Boccard, 1950.Google Scholar
Courtenay, W. J., ‘Covenant and Causality in Pierre d’Ailly’, Speculum 46 (1971), 94119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtenay, W. J., ‘The King and the Leaden Coin: The Economic Background of Sine Qua Non Causality’, Traditio 28 (1972), 185209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtenay, W. J., ‘Token Coinage and the Administration of Poor Relief during the Late Middle Ages’, JIH 3 (1972–3), 275–95.Google Scholar
Courtenay, W. J., Adam Wodeham: An Introduction to His Life and Writings. Leiden: Brill, 1978.Google Scholar
Courtenay, W. J., ‘The Dialectic of Divine Omnipotence in the Age of Chaucer: A Reconsideration’, in Keiper, H., Bode, C. and Utz, R. J., eds, Critical Studies. Nominalism and Literary Discourse. New Perspectives. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1997, 111–21Google Scholar
Courtney, F., Cardinal Robert Pullen: An English Theologian of the Twelfth Century. Rome: Pontificia Università Gregoriana, 1954.Google Scholar
Coyle, K. J., ‘Saint Augustine’s Manichean Legacy’, AugSt 34 (2003), 122.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. R., ‘Ammonius of Alexandria, Eusebius of Caesarea and the Origins of Gospels Scholarship’, NTS 61 (2015), 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creach, J., ‘The Destiny of the Righteous in the Theology of the Psalms’, in Jacobson, R. A., ed., Soundings in the Theology of the Psalms: Perspectives and Methods in Contemporary Scholarship. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2011, 4961.Google Scholar
Cremer, H., Die paulinische Rechtfertigungslehre im Zusammenhange ihrer geschichtlichen Voraussetzungen. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann, 1899.Google Scholar
Crisp, O., ‘Retrieving Zwingli’s Doctrine of Original Sin’, JRefTh 10 (2016), 340–60.Google Scholar
Cross, R. The Metaphysics of the Incarnation: Thomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, R.Aquinas on Physical Impairment: Human Nature and Original Sin’, HThR 110 (2017), 317–38.Google Scholar
Crouter, R., Friedrich Schleiermacher: Between Enlightenment and Romanticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullen, C. M., Bonaventure. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullmann, O., ‘The Plurality of the Gospels as a Theological Problem in Antiquity’, in Higgins, A. J. B., ed., The Early Church: Studies in Early Christian History and Theology. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1956, 3754.Google Scholar
Cummings, B.Justifying God in Tyndale’s English’, Reformation 2 (1997), 143–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, N. A., ‘The Particularity of the Pauline Epistles as a Problem in the Ancient Church’, in van Unnik, W. C., ed., Eine Freundesgabe Herrn Professor Dr. Oscar Cullmann zu seinem 60. Geburtstag überreicht. Leiden: Brill, 1962, 261–71.Google Scholar
Dalmau, J. M., ‘La teología de la disposición a la justificación en visperas de la revolución protestante’, RET 6 (1946), 249–75.Google Scholar
Daniell, D., William Tyndale: A Biography. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Dassmann, E., ‘Zum Paulusverständnis in der östliche Kirche’, JbAC 29 (1986), 2739.Google Scholar
Daston, L. J., ‘Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective’, SSS 22 (1992), 597–618.
Davids, E. A., Das Bild vom neuen Menschen: Ein Beitrag zum Verständnis des Corpus Macarianum. Salzburg: Pustet, 1968.Google Scholar
Davies, W. D., Paul and Rabbinic Judaism: Some Rabbinic Elements in Pauline Theology. 4th edn. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Davis, J. F., ‘Lollardy and the Reformation in England’, ARG 73 (1982), 217–37.Google Scholar
De Boer, M. C., ‘N. T. Wright’s Great Story and Its Relationship to Paul’s Gospel’, JSPL 4 (2014), 4958.Google Scholar
De Bruyn, T., ‘Ambrosiaster’s Revisions of His Commentary on Romans and Roman Synodal Statements about the Holy Spirit’, REAug 56 (2010), 4568.Google Scholar
De Campos, H. C., Doctrine in Development: Johannes Piscator and Debates over Christ’s Active Obedience. Grand Rapids, MI: Reformation Heritage Books, 2017.Google Scholar
De Clerck, D. E., ‘Droits du démon et nécessité de la rédemption: Les écoles d’Abélard et de Pierre Lombard’, RThAM 14 (1947), 3264.Google Scholar
De Frede, C., ‘La diffusione delle idee riformate nel Mezzogiornod’Italia: una premessa metodologica e un episodio concernente Girolamo Seripando’, in Cestaro, A., ed., Geronimo Seripando e la chiesa del suo tempo. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteraturam, 1997, 105–17.Google Scholar
De Kroon, M., ‘Pseudo-Augustin im Mittelalter: Entwurf eines Forschungsberichts’, Augustiniana 22 (1972), 511–30.Google Scholar
De Lubac, H., Surnaturel: Etude historique. Paris: Aubier, 1946.Google Scholar
De Roo, J. C. R., ‘The Concept of “Works of the Law” in Jewish and Christian Literature’, in Potter, S. E. and Pearson, B. W. R., eds, Christian–Jewish Relations through the Centuries. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 2000, 116–47.Google Scholar
De Roo, J. C. R., Works of the Law at Qumran and in Paul. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix, 2006.Google Scholar
De Villalmonte, A., ‘Andrés de Vega y el proceso de la justificación según el Concilio Tridentina’, RET 5 (1945), 311–74.Google Scholar
De Vogel, C. J., ‘Erasmus and His Attitude toward Church Dogma’, in Coppens, J., ed., Scrinium Erasmianum. 2 vols. Leiden: Brill, 1969, vol. 2, 101–32.Google Scholar
De Vooght, P., ‘A propos de la grâce actuelle dans la théologie de Saint Thomas’, Divus Thomas (Piacenza) 31 (1928), 386416.Google Scholar
Delgado, T., Doody, J. and Paffenroth, K., eds, Augustine and Social Justice. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2015.Google Scholar
Delius, H.-U., Augustin als Quelle Luthers: Eine Materialsammlung. Berlin: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 1984.Google Scholar
Delumeau, J., Sin and Fear: The Emergence of a Western Guilt Culture, 13th–18th Centuries. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Demmer, K., Ius Caritatis: Zur christologischen Grundlegung der augustinischen Naturrechtslehre. Rome: Libreria editrice dell’Università Gregoriana, 1961.Google Scholar
Denifle, H., Luther und Luthertum in der ersten Entwickelung, quellenmäßig dargestell. 2 vols. Mainz: Kirchheim, 1904, especially 392–5, 404–15.Google Scholar
Denifle, H., Die abendländischen Schriftausleger bis Luther über Iustitia Dei (Röm. 1.17) und Iustificatio. Mainz: Kircheim, 1905.Google Scholar
Dettloff, W., Die Lehre von der acceptatio divina bei Johannes Duns Scotus mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Rechtfertigungslehre. Werl: Dietrich Coelde Verlag, 1954.Google Scholar
Dettloff, W., Die Entwicklung der Akzeptations- und Verdienstlehre von Duns Scotus bis Luther mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Franziskanertheologen. Münster Aschendorff, 1963.Google Scholar
Dettloff, W., ‘Die antipelagianische Grundstruktur des scotischen Rechtfertigungslehre’, FS 48 (1966), 267–70.Google Scholar
Dessain, C. S., ‘Cardinal Newman and the Eastern Tradition’, DR 94 (1976), 8398.Google Scholar
Deuper, C., Johannes Calvins ‘Antidotum’ gegen das Rechtfertigungsdekret des Trienter Konzils (1547). Munich: GRIN Verlag, 2007.Google Scholar
Dhont, R.-C., Le problème de la préparation à la grâce: débuts de l’école franciscaine. Paris: Editions Franciscaines, 1946.Google Scholar
Diego, L., Scripture and Deism: The Biblical Criticism of the Eighteenth-Century British Deists. Bern: Peter Lang, 2008.Google Scholar
Diem, H., ‘Christologie und Rechtfertigung bei Karl Barth’, EvTh 23 (1963), 197213.Google Scholar
Diestel, L.Die Idee der Gerechtigkeit, vorzüglich im Alten Testament, biblisch-theologisch dargestellt’, Jahrbücher für deutsche Theologie 5 (1860), 173253.Google Scholar
Dieter, T., Der junge Luther und Aristoteles: Eine historisch-systematische Untersuchung zum Verhältnis von Theologie und Philosophie. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dieter, T., ‘Dalla “Dichiarazione congiunta sulla dottrina della giustificazione” verso una visione comune della apostolicità della chiesa nel dialogo luterano-cattolico’, Studi ecumenici 31 (2013), 6174.Google Scholar
Dixon, C. S., ‘Luther’s Ninety-Five Theses and the Origins of the Reformation Narrative’, EHR 132 (2017), 533–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodaro, R., Christ and the Just Society in the Thought of Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodds, G. D., Exploiting Erasmus: The Erasmian Legacy and Religious Change in Early Modern England. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dole, A., Schleiermacher on Religion and the Natural Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Doms, H., Die Gnadenlehre des sel. Albertus Magnus. Breslau: Müller & Seiffert, 1929.Google Scholar
Donfried, K., ‘Justification and Last Judgement in Paul’, ZNW 67 (1976), 90110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, J. P., Calvinism and Scholasticism in Vermigli’s Doctrine of Man and Grace. Leiden: Brill, 1976.Google Scholar
Douglass, E. J. D., Justification in Late Medieval Preaching: A Study of John Geiler of Strassburg. Leiden: Brill, 1966.Google Scholar
Drecoll, V. H., Die Entstehung der Gnadenlehre Augustins. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1999.Google Scholar
Du Toit, A. B., ‘Forensic Metaphors in Romans and Their Soteriological Significance’, in Van der Watt, J. G., ed., Salvation in the New Testament: Perspectives on Soteriology. Leiden: Brill, 2005, 213–46.Google Scholar
Dufays, J.-M., ‘La place du concept de “moyen-âge” dans l’historiographie’, Revue belge de philologie et d’histoire 65 (1987), 257–73.Google Scholar
Duffy, E., The Voices of Morebath: Reformation and Rebellion in an English Village. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Dunn, G. D., ‘Augustine, Cyril of Alexandria, and the Pelagian Controversy’, AugSt 37 (2006), 6388.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. D. G., ‘The New Perspective on Paul’, BJRL 65 (1983), 95122.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. D. G., ‘The Justice of God: A Renewed Perspective on Justification by Faith’, JThS 43 (1992), 122.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. D. G., Jesus, Paul and the Law. London: SPCK, 1995.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. D. G., The Theology of Paul the Apostle. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2006.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. D. G., The New Perspective on Paul. Rev. ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2008.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. D. G., Neither Jew nor Greek: A Contested Identity. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2015.Google Scholar
Dunne, J. A., and Lewellen, E., eds, One God, One People, One Future: Essays in Honour of N. T. Wright. London: SPCK, 2018.Google Scholar
Dupont, A., ‘Die Christusfigur des Pelagius: Rekonstruktion der Christologie im Kommentar von Pelagius zum Römerbrief des Paulus’, Augustiniana 56 (2006), 321–72.Google Scholar
Dupré, L. K., The Enlightenment and the Intellectual Foundations of Modern Culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Duval, Y.-M., ‘La date de “De natura” de Pélage: les prèmieres étapes de la controverse sur la nature de la grâce’, REAug 36 (1990), 257–83.Google Scholar
Eaton, M., ‘Toward an Anabaptist Covenantal Soteriology: A Dialogue with Balthasar Hubmaier and Contemporary Pauline Scholarship’, MQR 84 (2010), 6793.Google Scholar
Ebach, J., ‘Barmherzigkeit und Gerechtigkeit: Biblische Beobachtungen und Impressionen’, Theologisch-praktische Quartalschrift 16 (2016), 339–47.Google Scholar
Ebeling, G., Kirchengeschichte als Geschichte der Auslegung der Heiligen Schrift. Tübingen: Mohr, 1947.Google Scholar
Ebeling, G.Die Anfänge von Luthers Hermeneutik’, in Lutherstudien I. Tübingen: Mohr, 1971, 168Google Scholar
Ebeling, G.Karl Barths Ringen mit Luther’, in Luther Studien III. Tübingen: Mohr, 1985, 428573.Google Scholar
Eckholt, M., and Schweitzer, F., ‘Zur Gegenwartsbedeutung der Rechtfertigungsbotschaft für Religionspädagogik und kirchliche Bildungsarbeit’, RpB 52 (2004), 7990.Google Scholar
Edelstein, D., ed., The Super-Enlightenment: Daring to Know Too Much. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, M. J., ‘Justin’s Logos and the Word of God’, JECS 3 (1995), 261–80.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. J., ed., Visions of God and Ideas on Deification in Patristic Thought. London: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
Ehrle, F., Der Sentenzenkommentar Peters von Candia des Pisanerpapstes Alexander V. Münster: Aschendorff, 1925.Google Scholar
Ehrman, B., The Triumph of Christianity: How a Forbidden Religion Swept the World. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2018.Google Scholar
Elert, W., Der Kampf um das Christentum: Geschichte der Beziehungen zwischen dem evangelischen Christentum in Deutschland und dem allgemeinen Denken seit Schleiermacher und Hegel. Munich: Beck, 1921.Google Scholar
English, J. C., ‘The Path to Perfection in Pseudo-Macarius and John Wesley’, Pacifica 11 (1998), 5462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eno, R. B., ‘Some Patristic Views on the Relationship of Faith and Works in Justification’, RechAug 19 (1984), 327.Google Scholar
Ernst, W., Gott und Mensch am Vorabend der Reformation: Eine Untersuchung zur Moralphilosophie und -theologie bei Gabriel Biel. Leipzig: St Benno-Verlag, 1972.Google Scholar
Esteban-Segura, L. 2014. ‘Translating and Glossing Nouns in the Old English Gospels: A Contrastive Study’, Nordic Journal of English Studies 13 (2014), 3352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ettenhuber, K., Donne’s Augustine: Renaissance Cultures of Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etzkorn, G., ‘Walter Chatton and the Controversy on the Absolute Necessity of Grace’, FS 37 (1977), 3265.Google Scholar
Eugenio, D. O., Communion with the Triune God: The Trinitarian Soteriology of T. F. Torrance. Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2015.Google Scholar
Evans, G. R.The Borrowed Meaning: Grammar, Logic and the Problems of Theological Language in Twelfth-Century Schools’, DR 96 (1978), 165–75.Google Scholar
Evans, G. R. Old Arts and New Theology: The Beginnings of Theology as an Academic Discipline. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Evans, G. R.Peter the Chanter’s De Tropis Loquendi: The Problem of the Text’, New Scholasticism 55 (1981), 95103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. R. Augustine on Evil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Evans, G. R. Alan of Lille: The Frontiers of Theology in the Later Twelfth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. R. The Language and Logic of the Bible: The Earlier Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabian, B., Selecta Anglicana: Buchgeschichtliche Studien zur Aufnahme der englischen Literatur in Deutschland im achtzehnten Jahrhundert. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1994.Google Scholar
Fairbairn, D., ‘Patristic Soteriology: Three Trajectories’, JETS 50 (2007), 289310.Google Scholar
Falluomini, C., ‘The Gothic Version of the New Testament’, in Ehrman, B. D. and Holmes, M. W., eds, The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research. Leiden: Brill, 2012, 329–50.Google Scholar
Farge, J. K., Orthodoxy and Reform in Early Reformation France: The Faculty of Theology of Paris, 1500–1543. Leiden: Brill, 1985.Google Scholar
Farthing, J. L., Thomas Aquinas and Gabriel Biel: Interpretations of St. Thomas Aquinas in German Nominalism on the Eve of the Reformation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Faulenbach, H., Die Struktur der Theologie des Amandus Polanus von Polansdorf. Zurich: EVZ-Verlag, 1967.Google Scholar
Feckes, C., Die Rechtfertigungslehre des Gabriel Biel und ihre Stellung innerhalb der nominalistischen Schule. Münster: Aschendorff, 1925.Google Scholar
Fédou, M., ‘L’intérêt du théologien pour le Moyen Âge’, ResSR 100 (2012), 167–86.Google Scholar
Felmberg, B. A. R., Die Ablasstheologie Kardinal Cajetans. Leiden: Brill, 1998.Google Scholar
Fenlon, D., Heresy and Obedience in Tridentine Italy: Cardinal Pole and the Counter Reformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Ferguson, R. A., The American Enlightenment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Fesko, J. V., Beyond Calvin: Union with Christ and Justification in Early Modern Reformed Theology (1517–1700). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fesko, J. V., ‘Romans 8:29–30 and the Question of the Ordo Salutis’, JRefTh 8 (2014), 3560.Google Scholar
Fink, D. C., ‘“The Doers of the Law Will Be Justified”: The Exegetical Origins of Martin Bucer’s Triplex Iustificatio’, JThS 58 (2007), 485524.Google Scholar
Fink, D. C., ‘Was There a “Reformation Doctrine of Justification”?’, HThR 103 (2010), 205–35.Google Scholar
Fink, D. C., ‘John Mair’s Doctrine of Justification within the Context of the Early Sixteenth Century’, in Slotemaker, J. T. and Witt, J. C., eds, A Companion to the Theology of John Mair. Leiden: Brill, 2015, 223–40.Google Scholar
Finstuen, A. S., Original Sin and Everyday Protestants: The Theology of Reinhold Niebuhr, Billy Graham, and Paul Tillich in an Age of Anxiety. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firpo, M., Riforma protestante ed eresie nell’Italia del Cinquecento. Rome: Laterza, 1993.Google Scholar
Firpo, M., Juan de Valdés and the Italian Reformation. London: Routledge, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiume, E., ‘Decretum Dei, solatium ineffabile: il contributo di Girolamo Zanchi (1516–1590) alla dottrina della doppia predestinazione e della perseveranza dei credenti’, BSSV 114 (1997), 6778.Google Scholar
Flasch, K., Logik des Schreckens: De Diversis Quaestionibus ad Simplicianum 12. 2nd edn. Mainz: Dieterich, 1995.Google Scholar
Flick, M., L’attimo della giustificazione secondo S. Tomasso. Rome: Pontificia Università Gregoriana, 1947.Google Scholar
Flogaus, R., Theosis bei Palamas und Luther: Ein Beitrag zum ökumenischen Gespräch. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1997.Google Scholar
Flogaus, R.Luther versus Melanchthon? Zur Frage der Einheit der Wittenberger Reformation in der Rechtfertigungslehre’, ARG 91 (2000), 646.Google Scholar
Flückiger, F., Der Ursprung des christlichen Dogmas: Eine Auseinandersetzung mit Albert Schweitzer und Martin Werner. Zurich: Evangelischer Verlag, 1955.Google Scholar
Fock, O., Der Socianismus nach seiner Stellung. Kiel, 1847.Google Scholar
Forde, S., ‘Natural Law, Theology, and Morality in Locke’, AJPS 45 (2001), 396409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, T. R. V., Eduard Böhl’s (1836‒1903) Concept for a Re-emergence of Reformation Thought. New York: Peter Lang, 2009.Google Scholar
Fox, R. W., ‘The Culture of Liberal Protestant Progressivism, 1875–1925’, JIH 23 (1993), 639–60.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, P., Testimonia Patrum: The Function of the Patristic Argument in the Theology of Philip Melanchthon. Geneva: Droz, 1961.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, P. Einigungsbestrebungen in der Reformationszeit: Zwei Wege ‒ Zwei Motive. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner, 1965.Google Scholar
François, W., ‘Augustinus Sanior Interpres Apostoli: Thomas Stapleton and the Louvain Augustinian School’s Reception of Paul’, in Holder, R. W., ed., A Companion to Paul in the Reformation. Leiden: Brill, 2009, 363–87.Google Scholar
François, W., ‘Augustine and the Golden Age of Biblical Scholarship in Louvain (1550–1650)’, in Gordon, B. and McLean, M., eds, Shaping the Bible in the Reformation: Books, Scholars and Their Readers in the Sixteenth Century. Leiden: Brill, 2012, 235–89.Google Scholar
François, W., and Gerace, A., ‘Trent and the Latin Vulgate: A Louvain Project?’, in François, W. and Soen, V., eds, The Council of Trent: Reform and Controversy in Europe and Beyond (1545–1700). 3 vols. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2018, vol. 1, 131–74.Google Scholar
Frank, G., and Selderhuis, H. J., eds, Melanchthon und der Calvinismus. Stuttgart: Fromman-Holzbog, 2005.Google Scholar
Franklin-Brown, M., Reading the World: Encyclopedic Writing in the Scholastic Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fransen, P., ‘Dogmengeschichtlichen Entfaltung der Gnadenlehre’, in Feiner, J. and Löhrer, M., eds, Mysterium Salutis: Grundriß heilsgeschichtlicher Dogmatik, Einsiedeln: Beinziger, 1973, vol. 4/2, 631722.Google Scholar
Fredriksen, P., ‘Excaecati Occulta Justitia Dei: Augustine on Jews and Judaism’, JECS 3 (1995), 299324.Google Scholar
Friedmann, R., The Theology of Anabaptism: An Interpretation. Scottdale, PA: Herald Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Friedrich, R., Martin Bucer ‒ Fanatiker der Einheit? Seine Stellungname zu theologischen Fragen seiner Zeit (Abendmals- und Kirchenverständnis) insbesondere nach seinem Briefwechsel der Jahre 1524–1541. Bonn: Verlag für Kultur und Wissenschaft, 2002.Google Scholar
Froehlich, K., ‘Justification Language in the Middle Ages’, in Anderson, H. G., Murphy, T. A. and Burgess, J. A., eds, Justification by Faith. Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Press, 1985, 143–61.Google Scholar
Fubini, R., Humanism and Secularization: From Petrarch to Valla. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fudge, T. A., ‘Icarus of Basel? Oecolampadius and the Early Swiss Reformation’, JRH 21 (1997), 268–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fürst, A., ‘Hieronymus und Augustinus’, in Von Origenes und Hieronymus zu Augustinus: Studien zur antiken Theologiegeschichte. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2011, 337–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galles, P., Situation und Botschaft: Die soteriologische Vermittlung von Anthropologie und Christologie in den offenen Denkformen von Paul Tillich und Walter Kasper. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamper, A., Gott als Richter in Mesopotamien und im Alten Testament: Zum Verständnis einer Gebetsbitte. Innsbruck: Universitätsverlag Wagner, 1966.Google Scholar
Garcia, M. A., Life in Christ: Union with Christ and Twofold Grace in Calvin’s Theology. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2008.Google Scholar
Garde, J. N., Old English Poetry in Medieval Christian Perspective: A Doctrinal Approach. Cambridge: D. S. Brewster, 1991.Google Scholar
Garde, J. N., and Muir, B. J., ‘Patristic Influence and the Poetic Intention in Old English Religious Verse’, JLTh 2 (1988), 4968.Google Scholar
Gardner, E. C., Justice and Christian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrigou-Lagrange, R., La synthèse Thomiste. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1947.Google Scholar
Gärtner, F., Karl Barth und Zinzendorf: Die bleibende Bedeutung Zinzendorfs auf Grund der Beurteilung des Pietismus durch Karl Barth. Munich: Kaiser Verlag, 1953.Google Scholar
Gebhardt, R., Heil als Kommunikationsgeschehen: Analysen zu dem in Luthers Rechtfertigungslehre implizierten Wirklichkeitsverständnis. Marburg: Elwert Verlag, 2002.Google Scholar
Gerace, A., and Gielis, G., ‘The Ambiguous Reception of the Doctrine of Duplex Iustitia in Leuven (1544–1556)’, Augustiniana 68 (2018), 91123.Google Scholar
Ghosh, K., The Wycliffite Heresy: Authority and the Interpretation of Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Gibbs, L. W., ‘Richard Hooker’s via Media Doctrine of Justification’, HThR 74 (1991), 211–20.Google Scholar
Gielis, M., ‘Leuven Theologians as Opponents of Erasmus and of Humanistic Theology’, in Rummel, E., ed., A Companion to Biblical Humanism and Scholasticism in the Age of Erasmus. Leiden: Brill, 2008, 197214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillon, B., ‘La grâce incréée chez quelques théologiens du XIVe siècle’, Divinitas 11 (1967), 671–80.Google Scholar
Gilson, E., ‘Roger Marston, un cas d’Augustinisme avicennisant’, Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge 8 (1952), 3742.Google Scholar
Girardin, B., Rhétorique et théologique: Calvin, le commentaire de l’epître aux Romains. Paris: Éditions Beauchesne, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleason, E. G., ‘On the Nature of Italian Evangelism: Scholarship, 1953–1978’, SCJ 9 (1978), 325.Google Scholar
Gleason, E. G., Gasparo Contarini: Venice, Rome, and Reform. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Gmainer-Pranzl, F., Glaube und Geschichte bei Karl Rahner und Gerhard Ebeling: Ein Vergleich transzendentaler und hermeneutischer Theologie. Innsbruck: TyroliaVerlag, 1996.Google Scholar
Goering, D. T., Friedrich Gogarten (1887–1967): Religionsrebell im Jahrhundert der Weltkriege. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goeters, J. F. G., ‘Zwinglis Werdegang als Erasmianer’, in Greschat, M. and Goeters, J. F. G., eds, Reformation und Humanismus: Robert Stupperich zum 65. Geburtstag. Witten: Luther-Verlag, 1969, 225–71.Google Scholar
Goeters, J. F. G., ‘Der reformierte Pietismus in Deutschland 1650–1690’, in van der Berg, J., ed., Der Pietismus vom siebzehnten bis zum frühen achtzehnten Jahrhundert. Gõttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1993, 241–77.Google Scholar
Gogarten, F.‚ ‘Das Problem einer theologischen Anthropologie’, ZZ 7 (1929), 493511.Google Scholar
Göhler, A., Calvins Lehre von der Heiligung dargestellt auf Grund der Institutio, exegetischer und homiletischer Schriften. Munich: Kaiser Verlag, 1934.Google Scholar
Goins, S., ‘Jerome’s Psalters’, in Brown, W. P., ed., The Oxford Handbook of the Psalms. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, 185–95.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, G., ‘Semitic Triradicalism and the Biradical Question’, in Kahn, G., ed., Semitic Studies in Honour of Edward Ullendorff. Leiden: Brill, 2005, 925.Google Scholar
Gomes, A. W., ‘Reason Run Amok? The Protestant Orthodox Charge of Rationalism against Fausus Socinus’, in Ballor, J. J., Sytsma, D. and Zuidema, J., eds, Church and School in Early Modern Protestantism. Leiden: Brill, 2013, 551–65.Google Scholar
Gonzáles Rivas, S., ‘Los teólogos salmantinos y el decreto de la justificación’, EE 21 (1947), 147–70.Google Scholar
Gordon, B., The Swiss Reformation. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Gordon, B., John Calvin’s Institutes of the Christian Religion: A Biography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorman, M., Inhabiting the Cruciform God: Kenosis, Justification, and Theosis in Paul’s Narrative Soteriology. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2009.Google Scholar
Gorman, M., ‘Justification and Justice in Paul’, JSPL 1 (2011), 2340.Google Scholar
Gössner, A., ‘Reichspolitik und Religionsgespräche’, in Frank, G. and Lange, A., eds, Philipp Melanchthon: Der Reformator zwischen Glauben und Wissen. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2017, 97107.Google Scholar
Goudriaan, A., and van Lieburg, F. A., eds, Revisiting the Synod of Dordt (1618–1619). Leiden: Brill, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gräb-Schmidt, E., ‘Die Bedeutung reformatorischer Einsichten für die ethische Urteilsbildung der Gegenwart’, ZThK 107 (2010), 479504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gräbe, P. J., ‘Salvation in Colossians and Ephesians’, in Van der Watt, J. G., ed., Salvation in the New Testament: Perspectives on Soteriology. Leiden: Brill, 2005, 287303.Google Scholar
Grabmann, M., Mittelalterliches Geistesleben: Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der Scholastik und Mystik. 3 vols. Munich: Hueber, 1926–56.Google Scholar
Grabmann, M., Die Geschichte der scholastischen Methode. 2 vols. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1957.Google Scholar
Graf, F. W., ‘Ursprüngliches Gefühl unmittelbarer Koinzidenz des Differenten: Zur Modifikation des Religionsbegriffs in der verschiedenen Auflagen von Schleiermachers “Reden über Religion”’, ZThK 75 (1978), 147–86.Google Scholar
Grane, L., Contra Gabrielem: Luthers Auseinandersetzung mit Gabriel Biel in der Disputatio contra scholasticam theologiam 1517. Copenhagen: Gyldendal, 1962.Google Scholar
Grane, L., ‘Gregor von Rimini und Luthers Leipziger Disputation’, StTh 22 (1968), 2949.Google Scholar
Grane, L., ‘Augustins “Expositio quarumdam propositionum ex Epistola ad Romanos” in Luthers Römerbriefvorlesung’, ZThK 69 (1972), 304–30.Google Scholar
Grant, R. W., ‘John Locke on Custom’s Power and Reason’s Authority’, Review of Politics 74 (2012), 607–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grass, H., ‘Die durch Jesum von Nazareth vollbrachte Erlösung: Ein Beitrag zur Erlösungslehre Schleiermachers’, in Kaiser, O., ed., Denkender Glaube: Festschrift für Carl Heinz Ratschow. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1976, 152–69.Google Scholar
Green, I. M., The Christian’s ABC: Catechisms and Catechizing in England c. 1530–1740. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greer, R. A., Christian Hope and Christian Life. New York: Herder, 2001.Google Scholar
Gregory, B. S., The Unintended Reformation: How a Religious Revolution Secularized Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greive, W., Die Glaubwürdigkeit des Christentums: Die Theologie Wolfhart Pannenbergs als Herausforderung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greschat, M., Melanchthon neben Luther: Studien zur Gestalt der Rechtfertigungslehre zwischen 1528 und 1537. Witten: Luther-Verlag, 1965.Google Scholar
Greschat, M., ‘Martin Bucers Bücherverzeichnis von 1518’, AKG 57 (1975), 162–85.Google Scholar
Greshake, G., Gnade als konkrete Freiheit: eine Untersuchung zur Gnadenlehre des Pelagius. Mainz: Matthias Grünewald Verlag, 1972.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J., Experience and Teleology in Ancient Historiography: Futures Past from Herodotus to Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grohmann, M., ‘Diskontinuität und Kontinuität in alttestamentlichen Identitätskonzepten’, in Öhler, M., ed., Religionsgemeinschaft und Identität: Prozesse jüdischer und christlicher Identitätsbildung im Rahmen der Antike. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlagsgesellschaft, 2013, 1742.Google Scholar
Gross, J., La Divinisation du chrétien d’après les pères grecs. Paris: Gabalda, 1938.Google Scholar
Grözinger, A., ‘Eduard Thurneysen’, in Möller, C., ed., Geschichte der Seelsorge in Einzelporträts. 3 vols. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag, 1996, vol. 3, 277–94.Google Scholar
Guardini, R. Systembildende Elemente in der Theologie Bonaventuras: Die Lehren vom Lumen Mentis, von der Gradatio Entium an der Influentia Sensus et Motus. Leiden: Brill, 1964.Google Scholar
Guerard des Lauriers, M. L., ‘La théologie de S. Thomas et la grâce actuelle’, L’Annee Theologique 6 (1945), 276332.Google Scholar
Guerard des Lauriers, M. L., ‘Saint Augustin et la question de la certitude de la grâce au Concile de Trente’, in Augustinus Magister. 3 vols. Paris: Etudes Augustiniennes, 1954, 2.1057–69.Google Scholar
Gundry, R. H., ‘Grace, Works and Staying Saved in Paul’, Biblia 60 (1985), 138.Google Scholar
Gyllenkrok, A., Rechtfertigung und Heiligung in der frühen evangelischen Theologie Luthers. Uppsala: Lundequistska bokhandeln, 1952.Google Scholar
Hafemann, S. J., ‘Paul and His Interpreters since F. C. Baur’, in Paul’s Message and Ministry in Covenant Perspective: Selected Essays. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books, 2015, 3‒28.Google Scholar
Hägglund, B., ‘Rechtfertigung – Wiedergeburt – Erneuerung in der nachreformatorischen Theologie’, KuD 5 (1959), 318–37.Google Scholar
Hägglund, B., ‘Luthers Anthropologie’, in Junghans, H., ed., Leben und Werk Martin Luthers von 1526 bis 1546: Festgabe zu seinem 500. Geburtstag. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1983, 6376.Google Scholar
Hahn, F., ‘Gibt es eine Entwicklung in den Aussagen über die Rechtfertigung bei Paulus?’, EvTh 53 (1993), 342–66.Google Scholar
Haldane, J., ‘Voluntarism and Realism in Medieval Ethics’, Journal of Medical Ethics 15 (1989), 3944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, B., ‘The Early Rise and Gradual Decline of Lutheranism in England (1520–1600)’, in Baker, D., ed., Reform and Reformation: England and the Continent c. 1500–c. 1750. Oxford: Blackwell, 1979, 103–31.Google Scholar
Hall, H. A., Philip Melanchthon and the Cappadocians: A Reception of Greek Patristic Sources in the Sixteenth Century. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallonsten, G., Satisfactio bei Tertullian: Überprüfung einer Forschungstradition. Malmö: CWK Gleerup, 1984.Google Scholar
Hallonsten, G., Merit bei Tertullian: Überprüfung einer Forschungstradition 2. Malmö: CWK Gleerup, 1985.Google Scholar
Hallonsten, G., ‘Theosis in Recent Research: A Renewal of Interest and a Need for Clarity’, in Christensen, M. and Wittung, J., eds, Partakers of the Divine Nature: The History and Development of Deification in the Christian Traditions. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2007, 281–93.Google Scholar
Hamilton, S., The Practice of Penance, 900–1050. London: Royal Historical Society, 2011.Google Scholar
Hamm, B., Promissio, pactum, ordinatio: Freiheit und Selbstbindung Gottes in der scholastischen Gnadenlehre. Tübingen: Mohr, 1977.Google Scholar
Hamm, B., ‘Was ist reformatorische Rechtfertigungslehre?’, ZThK 83 (1986), 138.Google Scholar
Hamm, B., ‘Wie innovativ war die Reformation?’, ZHF 27 (2000), 481–97.Google Scholar
Hamm, B., Der frühe Luther: Etappen reformatorischer Neuorientierung. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2010.Google Scholar
Hammann, K., Rudolf Bultmann und seine Zeit: Biographische und Theologische Konstellationen. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2016.Google Scholar
Hammer, F., Genugtuung und Heil: Absicht, Sinn und Grenzen der Erlösungslehre Anselms von Canterbury. Vienna: Herder, 1966.Google Scholar
Hardwick, C., A History of the Articles of Religion. 3rd edn. London: Bell, 1890.Google Scholar
Hare, J. C., Vindication of Luther against His Recent English Assailants. 2nd edn. Cambridge: MacMillan, 1855.Google Scholar
Häring, N., Die Theologie der Erfurter Augustiner-Eremiten Bartholomäus Arnoldi von Usingen. Limburg: Pallottiner Verlag, 1939.Google Scholar
Harkins, F. T., ‘Filiae Magistri: Peter Lombard’s Sentences and Medieval Theological Education “On the Ground”’, in Rosemann, P. W., ed., Medieval Commentaries on the Sentences of Peter Lombard. 3 vols. Leiden: Brill, 2001–15, vol. 3, 2678.Google Scholar
Härle, W., ‘Analytische und synthetische Urteile in der Rechtfertigungslehre’, NZSTh 6 (1974), 1734.Google Scholar
Härle, W., ‘Zur Gegenwartsbedeutung der “Rechtfertigungs”-Lehre: Eine Problem-skizze’, ZThK 10 (1998), 101–39.Google Scholar
Härle, W., and Neuner, P., eds, Im Licht der Gnade Gottes: Zur Gegenwartsbedeutung der Rechtfertigungsbotschaft. Münster: LIT Verlag, 2004.Google Scholar
Harris, H., The Tübingen School: A Historical and Theological Investigation of the School of F. C. Baur. 2nd edn. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1990.Google Scholar
Harrison, C., Rethinking Augustine’s Early Theology: An Argument for Continuity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, P., ‘Religion’ and the Religions in the English Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, D. B., The Doors of the Sea: Where Was God in the Tsunami? Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2005.Google Scholar
Haubst, R., ‘Anselms Satisfaktionslehre einst und heute’, TThZ 80 (1971), 88‒109.Google Scholar
Hauke, R., Gott-Haben, um Gottes Willen: Andreas Osianders Theosisgedanke und die Diskussion um die Grundlagen der evangelisch verstandenen Rechtfertigung. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1999.Google Scholar
Hausamman, S., Römerbriefvorlesung zwischen Humanismus und Reformation: Eine Studie zu Heinrich Bullingers Römerbriefvorlesung von 1525. Zurich: Zwingli Verlag, 1970.Google Scholar
Hauschildt, E., ‘Rechtfertigung im Alltag’, in Rechtfertigung – folgenlos? Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt 2017, 173–85.Google Scholar
Havelock, E. A., The Greek Concept of Justice: From Its Shadow in Homer to Its Substance in Plato. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Z., The General Doctrine of Creation in the Thirteenth Century with Special Emphasis on Matthew of Aquasparta. Munich: Schoningh, 1964.Google Scholar
Headley, J. M., Hillerbrand, H. J. and Papalas, A. J., eds, Confessionalization in Europe, 1555–1700. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004.Google Scholar
Healey, M., ‘Biblical Interpretation since Divino afflante Spiritu’, in Ayres, L. and Volpe, M. A., eds, The Oxford Handbook of Catholic Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019, 767–81.Google Scholar
Hefner, J., Die Entstehungsgeschichte des Trienter Rechtfertigungsdekretes: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des Reformationszeitalters. Paderborn: Verlag Bonifacius-Druckerei, 1939.Google Scholar
Heil, J., ‘Haimo’s Commentary on Paul: Sources, Methods and Theology’, in Shimahara, S., ed., Études d’exégèse carolingienne: autour d’Haymon d’Auxerre. Turnhout: Brepols, 2007, 103–21.Google Scholar
Heil, J. P., ‘Christ, the Termination of the Law (Romans 9:30–10:8)’, CBQ 63 (2001), 484–98.Google Scholar
Heit, A., Versöhnte Vernunft: Eine Studie zur systematischen Bedeutung des Rechtfertigungsgedankens für Kants Religionsphilosophie. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heither, T., Translatio Religionis: Die Paulusdeutung des Origenes in seinem Kommentar zum Römerbrief. Cologne: Böhlau, 1990.Google Scholar
Hennings, R., Der Briefwechsel zwischen Augustinus und Hieronymus und ihr Streit um fen Kanon des Alten Testaments und die Auslegung von Gal. 2, 11–14. Leiden: Brill, 1994.Google Scholar
Heppe, H., Geschichte des Pietismus und der Mystik in der reformirten Kirche, namentlich der Niederlande. Leiden: Brill, 1851.Google Scholar
Herdt, J. A., ‘Alasdair Macintyre’s “Rationality of Traditions” and Tradition-Transcendental Standards of Justification’, JR 78 (1998), 524–46.Google Scholar
Hermann, R., Luthers These ‘Gerecht und Sünder zugleich’: Eine systematische Untersuchung. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1960.Google Scholar
Heron, A. I. C., ‘Wenn Luther uns mit unserem Bekenntnis annehmen will: Luther und die Abendmahlsfrage in den Briefen Calvins bis 1546’, in Litz, G., Munzert, H. and Liebenberg, R., eds, Frömmigkeit – Theologie – Frömmigkeitstheologie: Festschrift für Berndt Hamm zum 60. Geburtstag. Leiden: Brill, 2005, 395409.Google Scholar
Hess, H., ‘The Place of Divinization in Athanasian Soteriology’, StPatr (1993), 369–74.
Hervé de l’Incarnation, ‘La grâce dans l’oeuvre de S. Leon le Grand’, RThAM 22 (1955), 193212.
Heubach, J., Luther und Theosis. Erlangen: Martin-Luther-Verlag, 1990.Google Scholar
Heynck, V., ‘Die aktuelle Gnade bei Richard von Mediavilla’, FS 22 (1935), 297325.Google Scholar
Heynck, V., ‘Untersuchungen uber die Reuelehre der tridentinischen Zeit’, FS 29 (1942), 2544, 120–50; 30 (1943), 53–73.Google Scholar
Heynck, V., ‘A Controversy at the Council of Trent Concerning the Doctrine of Duns Scotus’, FrS 9 (1949), 181258.Google Scholar
Heynck, V., ‘Der Anteil des Konzilstheologen Andreas de Vega O.F.M. an dem ersten amtlichen Entwurf des Trienter Rechtfertigungsdekretes’, FS 33 (1951), 4981.Google Scholar
Heynck, V., ‘Zum Problem der unvollkommenen Reue auf dem Konzil von Trient’, in Schreiber, G., ed., Das Weltkonzil von Trient: Sein Werden und Wirken. 2 vols. Freiburg: Herder, 1951, 231–80.Google Scholar
Heynck, V., ‘Zur Kontroverse uber die Gnadengewissheit auf dem Konzil von Trient’, FS 37 (1955), 117, 161–88.Google Scholar
Heynck, V., ‘Die Bedeutung von “mereri” und “promereri” bei dem Konzilstheologen Andreas de Vega O.F.M.’, FS 50 (1968), 224–38.Google Scholar
Hickling, C. J. A., ‘Centre and Periphery in the Thought of St Paul’, StB 3. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1978, 199214.Google Scholar
Higman, F. M., ‘Theology for the Layman in the French Reformation, 1520–1550’, The Library 9 (1987), 105–27.Google Scholar
Higman, F. M., ‘Histoire du Livre et histoire de la Réforme’, BSHPF 148 (2002), 837–50.Google Scholar
Hildesheimer, F., Le Jansénisme: L’histoire et l’héritage. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1992.Google Scholar
Hill, D., Greek Words and Hebrew Meanings: Studies in the Semantics of Soteriological Terms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Hillerbrand, H. J., ‘Was There a Reformation in the Sixteenth Century?ChH 72 (2003), 525–52.Google Scholar
Hillgarth, J. N., ‘Who Read Thomas Aquinas?’, in The Gilson Lectures on Thomas Aquinas. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2008, 4673.Google Scholar
Hinlicky, P. R., ‘Theological Anthropology: Toward Integrating Theosis and Justification by Faith’, JES 34 (1997), 3873.Google Scholar
Hirsch, E., Die Theologie des Andreas Osiander und ihre geschichtlichen Voraussetzungen. Göttingen: Mohn, 1919.Google Scholar
Ho, A., Ṣedeq and Ṣedaqah in the Hebrew Bible. New York: Peter Lang, 1991.Google Scholar
Hoburg, R., Seligkeit und Heilsgewissheit: Hermeneutik und Schriftauslegung bei Huldrych Zwingli bis 1522. Stuttgart: Calwer Verlag, 1994.Google Scholar
Hocedez, E., Richard de Middleton: sa vie, ses oeuvres, sa doctrine. Louvain: Spicilegium Sacrum Lovaniense, 1925.Google Scholar
Hochstetter, E., ‘Nominalismus?FrS 9 (1949), 370403.Google Scholar
Hodgson, L., For Faith and Freedom. 2 vols. Oxford: Blackwell, 1956.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, F., Die Schriften des Oxforder Kanzlers Johannes Lutterell: Texte zur Theologie des 14. Jahrhunderts. Leipzig: St. Benno-Verlag, 1959.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, M., ‘Faith and Piety in Erasmus’s Thought’, SCJ 20 (1989), 241–58.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, M., ‘Language and Reconciliation: Erasmus’s Ecumenical Method’, ERSY 15 (1995), 7195.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, V., ‘Rechtfertigung als Gabe der Anerkennung’, ÖR 60 (2011), 160–77.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, V., Skizzen zu einer Theologie der Gabe: Rechtfertigung – Opfer – Eucharistie – Gottes – und Nächstenliebe. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder, 2013.Google Scholar
Hofmann, F., Albrecht Ritschls Lutherrezeption. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus, 1998.Google Scholar
Hohenberger, T., Lutherische Rechtfertigungslehre in den reformatorischen Flugschriften der Jahre 1521–2. Tübingen: Mohr, 1996.Google Scholar
Holc, P., Un ampio consenso sulla dottrina della giustificazione: studio sul dialogo teologico cattolico-luterano. Rome: Libreria editrice dell’Università Gregoriana, 1999.Google Scholar
Holder, R. W., ‘Erasmus and the Novum Instrumentum’, CHRC 96 (2016), 491–7.Google Scholar
Holfelder, H. H., Tentatio et consolatio: Studien zu Bugenhagens Interpretatio in Librum Psalmorum. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holfelder, H. H., Solus Christus: Die Ausbildung von Bugenhagens Rechtfertigungslehre in der Paulusauslegung (1524/25) und ihre Bedeutung für die theologische Argumentation im Sendbrief ‘Von dem christlichen Glauben’. Tübingen: Mohr, 1981.Google Scholar
Holl, K., ‘Die justitia Dei in der vorlutherischen Bibelauslegung des Abendlandes’, in Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Kirchengeschichte. 3 vols. Tübingen: Mohr, 1928, vol. 3, 171–88.Google Scholar
Holl, K., ‘Die Rechtfertigungslehre in Luthers Vorlesung über den Römerbrief mit besonderer Rücksicht auf die Frage der Heilsgewißheit’, in Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Kirchengeschichte. 3 vols. Tübingen: Mohr, 1928, vol. 1, 111–54.Google Scholar
Holl, K., ‘Was verstand Luther unter Religion?’, in Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Kirchengeschichte. 3 vols. Tübingen: Mohr, 1928, 1110.Google Scholar
Hollingworth, M., Saint Augustine of Hippo: An Intellectual Biography. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, B. K., Gabe und Geben bei Luther: Das Verhältnis zwischen Reziprozität und reformatorischer Rechtfertigungslehre. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, S. R., ‘Healing the Social Leper in Gregory of Nyssa’s and Gregory of Nazianzus’s Peri Philoptochia’, HThR 92 (1999), 283309.Google Scholar
Holmes, R., The Age of Wonder: How the Romantic Generation Discovered the Beauty and Terror of Science. New York: Vintage Books, 2010.Google Scholar
Holmes, S. R., ‘Reformed Varieties of the Communicatio Idiomatum’, in Rae, M. A., ed., The Person of Christ. London: T&T Clark, 2005, 7086.Google Scholar
Holsinger-Friesen, T., Irenaeus and Genesis: A Study of Competition in Early Christian Hermeneutics. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2009.Google Scholar
Holtzen, T. L., ‘Newman’s “Via Media” Theology of Justification’, Newman Studies Journal 4 (2007), 6474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hommel, H., ‘Wahrheit und Gerechtigkeit: Zur Geschichte und Deutung eines Begriffspaars’, AuA 15 (1969), 159–86.Google Scholar
Hooker, M. D., ‘On Becoming the Righteousness of God: Another Look at 2 Cor 5:21’, NT 50 (2008), 358–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horan, D. P., ‘How Original Was Scotus on the Incarnation? Reconsidering the History of the Absolute Primacy of Christ in Light of Robert Grosseteste’, HeyJ 52 (2011), 374–91.Google Scholar
Horgan, A. D., ‘Justice in The Pearl’, Review of English Studies 32 (1981), 173–80.Google Scholar
Horn, C., ‘Politische Gerechtigkeit bei Cicero und Augustinus’, Etica & Politica 9 (2007), 4670.