Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-6c8bd87754-9k7mv Total loading time: 0.178 Render date: 2022-01-16T20:20:58.725Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

11 - The identity of the bourgeois liberal republic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2010

Biancamaria Fontana
Affiliation:
Université de Lausanne, Switzerland
Get access

Summary

To grasp accurately what has been involved in the invention of the modern constitutional republic it is necessary to select a relatively ample framework, both of chronology and of geography. The key practical episodes in this passage of invention may have taken place (as is conventionally agreed) in eighteenth-century north America and France. But it has required most of the twentieth century to clarify even their most essential implications; and it is a trifle sanguine to assume that all of their major implications are yet apparent even today.

At present the modern constitutional republic stands virtually unchallenged as the sole surviving candidate for a model of legitimate political authority in the modern world. It does so, to be sure, in a fairly distinct form – and in a form the merits of which were far from uncontroversial in the north America of the 1780s or the France of the early 1790s. All modern constitutional republics of any longevity now profess to be democracies (as do many regimes which are far from constitutional in the sense in question). Their overt claim to legitimacy is now a direct function of their claim to be democracies. But this last pretension must be understood not as the intrinsically heady classical claim to realise ancient liberty – the claim that the sovereign political community is simply identical with the free public acts of its free citizens – but rather as an instrumental precondition for enjoying (and an assertion of the popular entitlement to enjoy) the more tepid, if more dependable, charms of modern liberty.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
6
Cited by

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×